LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-09-15
Case ID: nm_004333_6_c_1799t_a
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_004333.6:c.1799T>A

BRAF  · NP_004324.2:p.(Val600Glu)  · NM_004333.6
GRCh37: chr7:140453136 A>T  ·  GRCh38: chr7:140753336 A>T
Gene: BRAF Transcript: NM_004333.6
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3 moderate PM1 moderate PM2 supporting PP3 supporting
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_004333.6
Protein
NP_004324.2:p.(Val600Glu)
gnomAD AF
1.2399855665680052e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS3 (Moderate): two or more VCEP-approved functional assays show V600E increases MEK/ERK pathway signaling.
2
PM1 (Moderate): residue 600 lies in the VCEP-approved CR3 activation segment (amino acids 594-627).
3
PM2 (Supporting): the variant is effectively absent from gnomAD, with 2 of 1,612,922 v4.1 exome alleles (AF 1.24e-06).
4
PP3 (Supporting): REVEL 0.931 exceeds the VCEP missense cutoff of 0.7.
5
Overall: Likely Pathogenic, reached from 2 moderate plus 2 supporting criteria under the BRAF v2.3 combination rules.
Final determination: Under the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel BRAF v2.3 criteria-combination framework, 2 Pathogenic.Moderate criteria (PS3 moderate + PM1) together with >=2 Pathogenic.Supporting criteria (PM2 supporting + PP3 supporting) satisfy the Likely Pathogenic rule for '2 moderate + 2 supporting' (Rule14), with PS3_Moderate restored to the Pathogenic.Moderate partition because that code is omitted from the v2.3 payload even though the same specification declares PS3 Moderate applicable.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF v2.3 specification marks PVS1 not applicable, and p.(Val600Glu) is a missense substitution rather than a loss-of-function change.
cspec
PS1 N/A Not applicable: c.1799T>A is itself the canonical pathogenic p.(Val600Glu) record, so no different nucleotide change exists to serve as its comparator. Flagged for human review: the specification wording could also be read as making that identical record sufficient.
cspec clinvar pm5_candidates vcep_raf_alignment
PS2 Not assessed Not assessed: no proband, family history, or parental testing was available to establish the confirmed de novo occurrence PS2 requires.
cspec clinvar PMID:12068308 PMID:25741868
PS3 Met Met at moderate strength: two or more VCEP-approved functional assays show V600E increases MEK/ERK pathway signaling.
cspec vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies PMID:19251651 PMID:20179705
PS4 Not assessed Not assessed: no germline RASopathy case counts or phenotype data were available, which PS4 requires to assign points.
cspec clinvar PMID:12068308 PMID:22142829 PMID:22855150 PMID:25741868
PM1 Met Met at moderate strength: residue 600 lies within the VCEP-approved CR3 activation segment (amino acids 594-627).
cspec vcep_raf_alignment PMID:22855150 PMID:22142829
PM2 Met Met at supporting strength: the variant is effectively absent from gnomAD, with 2 of 1,612,922 v4.1 exome alleles (AF 1.24e-06). Strictly read, 1-2 observed alleles do not satisfy 'absent', and supporting is the only tier this ruleset allows.
cspec gnomad_v4 gnomad_v2 gnomad_canada PMID:22855150 PMID:12068308
PM3 N/A Not applicable: BRAF v2.3 designates PM3 not applicable because BRAF RASopathy disease is inherited autosomal dominant, not recessive.
cspec
PM4 Not met Not met: p.(Val600Glu) is a missense substitution with no protein-length change, whereas PM4 requires an in-frame indel or stop-loss change.
cspec
PM5 Not assessed Not assessed: no other established pathogenic amino-acid change at codon 600 was identified to serve as the required comparison.
cspec pm5_candidates
PM6 Not assessed Not assessed: no proband or parental genotyping was available, so neither an observed nor an assumed de novo occurrence could be scored.
cspec clinvar PMID:12068308 PMID:25741868
PP1 Not assessed Not assessed: no family pedigree or informative meioses were available to test co-segregation of the variant with disease.
cspec clinvar PMID:25741868
PP2 Not assessed Not assessed: no BRAF missense z score or gnomAD gene-constraint metric was available, which PP2 requires.
cspec
PP3 Met Met at supporting strength: REVEL 0.931 exceeds the VCEP missense threshold of 0.7.
cspec revel
PP4 N/A Not applicable: BRAF v2.3 routes phenotype-specificity evidence to PS4 and explicitly designates PP4 not applicable.
cspec
PP5 Not met Not met: the ClinVar record has 0 expert-panel (three-star) submissions, which PP5 requires to trigger.
cspec clinvar
BA1 Not met Not met: even the highest subpopulation frequency (3.27e-05, South Asian) falls about 15-fold below the 0.05% BA1 threshold.
cspec gnomad_v4 gnomad_v2 gnomad_canada
BS1 Not met Not met: even the highest subpopulation frequency (3.27e-05, South Asian) falls clearly below the 0.025% BS1 threshold.
cspec gnomad_v4 gnomad_v2 gnomad_canada
BS2 Not met Not met: no homozygotes were observed and the 1-2 heterozygous carriers carry no phenotype information, so no BS2 points are awarded.
cspec gnomad_v4 gnomad_v2 gnomad_canada
BS3 N/A Not applicable: BRAF v2.3 explicitly marks BS3 not applicable, so no benign functional evidence criterion is assigned.
cspec
BS4 Not assessed Not assessed: no family pedigree or affected-relative genotypes were available to demonstrate non-segregation of the variant.
cspec clinvar PMID:25741868
BP1 N/A Not applicable: BP1 targets truncating variants, whereas p.(Val600Glu) is a missense substitution in a gene whose mechanism is gain of function.
cspec
BP2 Not assessed Not assessed: no second BRAF pathogenic variant or phase determination was available to establish an alternative molecular cause.
cspec
BP3 N/A Not applicable: BRAF v2.3 marks BP3 not applicable, and this is a single-residue substitution rather than an in-frame length change.
cspec
BP4 Not met Not met: REVEL 0.931 is far above the 0.3 missense threshold BP4 requires for benign support.
cspec revel
BP5 Not assessed Not assessed: no co-occurring causative variant or phenotype severity data were available to assign negative points.
cspec
BP6 Not met Not met: the ClinVar record has 0 expert-panel (three-star) submissions, and none of its assertions are benign.
cspec clinvar
BP7 N/A Not applicable: c.1799T>A is a coding missense change, not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variant as BP7 requires.
cspec
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.