0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MSH6 c.4002-28_4002-26dup, p.?

NM_000179.3:c.4002-28_4002-26dup NP_000170.1:p.? View identifiers
Classification
Benign

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is benign. Select a step to read what it means.

Benign.A benign classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MSH6

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 3
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 3
BA1Stand alone
BA1 · stand alone

gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 0.027 (2.70%), far exceeding the VCEP BA1 stand-alone threshold of ≥0.0022 (0.22%). The variant is observed in 6 homozygotes in v4.1 and 2 homozygotes in v2.1. Highest frequency in the East Asian population (2.83% in v4, 3.14% in v2). No evidence this is a founder pathogenic variant.

BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact for this intronic variant (max delta score = 0.00), meeting the VCEP BP4_Supporting threshold of ≤0.1 per Walker et al. 2023.

BP7Supporting
BP7 · supporting

Intronic duplication located at positions -26 and -28 relative to exon 10, which is at or beyond the VCEP BP7 threshold of -21. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00).

Recorded classification: Benign

ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for MSH6 Version 2.0.0 v2.0.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule17 (1 Benign.Stand Alone) with applied criteria: BA1 stand-alone benign, BP4 supporting benign, BP7 supporting benign; maps to Benign.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
1,883 / 1,403,604 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 1,883 / 1,403,604 alleles. Recorded AF 0.00134155. Recorded homozygote count 6.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00252012; MAF= 0.25201%, 570/226180 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.0313601; MAF= 3.13601%, 445/14190 alleles, homozygotes = 2); grpmax FAF= 0.0565538.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
3 reported laboratory submissions

2 Benign · 1 Likely benign.

Context only ClinVar ↗
No screenshot for this evidence
Functional evidence
Not recorded

No standalone functional evidence summary is recorded in evidence_summary.functional.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Context only COSMIC ↗
For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 12 not met · 0 not assessed · 13 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

BA1 is met at stand-alone strength: gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 0.027 (2.70%), far exceeding the VCEP threshold of ≥0.0022 (0.22%). The variant is observed in 6 homozygotes in v4.1 and 2 homozygotes in v2.1, and is not a known founder pathogenic variant.

BP7 is met at supporting benign strength: the variant is an intronic duplication at positions -26 to -28 relative to exon 10, which is beyond the VCEP BP7 threshold of -21.

BP4 is met at supporting benign strength: SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score = 0.00), meeting the VCEP BP4_Supporting threshold of ≤0.1 for intronic variants.

Per the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0 combination rules, BA1 stand-alone alone is sufficient for a Benign classification (Rule 17).

Met · 3

BA1 Stand alonegnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 0.027 (2.70%), far exceeding the VCEP BA1 stand-alone threshold of ≥0.0022 (0.22%). The variant is observed in 6 homozygotes in v4.1 and 2 homozygotes in v2.1. Highest frequency in the East Asian population (2.83% in v4, 3.14% in v2). No evidence this is a founder pathogenic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF = 0.027 (2.70%)
  • gnomAD v2.1 grpmax FAF = 0.057 (5.66%)
  • gnomAD v4.1: 6 homozygotes
  • gnomAD v2.1: 2 homozygotes
  • VCEP BA1 threshold: ≥0.0022 (0.22%)
  • Excluded as founder pathogenic variant: no evidence of founder pathogenicity
Sources
BP4 SupportingSpliceAI predicts no splicing impact for this intronic variant (max delta score = 0.00), meeting the VCEP BP4_Supporting threshold of ≤0.1 per Walker et al. 2023. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00
  • VCEP BP4_Supporting threshold: SpliceAI delta ≤ 0.1 for intronic variants
Sources
BP7 SupportingIntronic duplication located at positions -26 and -28 relative to exon 10, which is at or beyond the VCEP BP7 threshold of -21. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant position: c.4002-28_4002-26 (intronic
  • beyond -21 from exon boundary)
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00
  • VCEP BP7 rule: intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7
Sources

Not met · 12 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PVS1 Intronic duplication at c.4002-28_4002-26 (26-28 nucleotides upstream of exon 10 in MSH6 intron 9). Does not affect a canonical splice donor/acceptor site and is not predicted to alter splicing (SpliceAI max delta = 0.00). Does not fall into any VCEP PVS1 strength category (nonsense/frameshift, large genomic alteration, IVS±1,2, or patient mRNA-confirmed splicing aberration). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00)
  • Variant is intronic
  • not at canonical ±1
  • 2 splice consensus
  • Variant bucket classified as 'other' by generic PVS1 framework
Sources
PS2 No de novo observations have been reported for this variant in any database or literature. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No de novo reports identified in ClinVar
  • gnomAD
  • or published literature
PS3 No calibrated functional assay data available for this variant. No patient mRNA or minigene splicing assay demonstrating a damaging effect has been reported. The functional assay SVI documentation spreadsheet does not list this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from VCEP calibrated functional assay documentation
  • SpliceAI delta = 0.00 does not support a damaging splice effect
Sources
2574186825394175
PM2 Variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 at an allele frequency of 0.134% (1883/1403604 alleles, 6 homozygotes), far exceeding the VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of <0.002% (<1 in 50,000 alleles). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF=0.134%
  • 1883 alleles
  • 6 homozygotes
  • gnomAD v2.1 AF=0.252%
  • 570 alleles
  • 2 homozygotes
  • VCEP PM2 threshold: <0.002%
Sources
PP1 No co-segregation data available for this variant. No pedigrees with formal Bayes likelihood ratio analysis have been reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No segregation data found in ClinVar
  • LOVD
  • or published literature
PP3 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score = 0.00), below the VCEP PP3_Supporting threshold of ≥0.2 for non-canonical splice variants. HCI prior is not applicable for this non-missense variant. No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (<0.2 threshold)
  • HCI prior not applicable (intronic duplication
  • not missense)
Sources
PP4 No tumor phenotype data (MSI status, IHC for MMR protein expression) have been reported for patients carrying this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No MSI-H tumor data available
  • No MMR IHC data available
BS1 gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.027 (2.70%), which exceeds the VCEP BS1 upper bound of <0.0022 (0.22%). The variant frequency is too high for BS1 and is captured by BA1 instead. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF = 0.027 > 0.0022 BS1 upper bound
  • VCEP BS1 range: 0.00022 to <0.0022
Sources
BS2 No data demonstrating co-occurrence in trans with a known pathogenic MSH6 variant in a patient with colorectal cancer after age 45 without CMMRD features. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No trans co-occurrence data available
BS3 No laboratory functional assay data available demonstrating no splicing aberration or proficient MMR function. The VCEP BS3 rule for intronic variants requires mRNA aberration assessment by laboratory assays conducted with NMD inhibition; in silico SpliceAI prediction alone is insufficient. This variant is not listed in the VCEP calibrated functional assay documentation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI delta = 0.00 predicts no splicing impact (in silico only)
  • Variant absent from VCEP functional assay SVI documentation
  • No patient mRNA or minigene assay data available
Still missing
  • No laboratory mRNA assay data with NMD inhibition confirming absence of splicing aberration
Sources
spliceai ↗2574186825394175
BS4 No segregation data available to evaluate lack of co-segregation with disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No segregation data found in any source
BP5 No tumor phenotype data (MSS status, MMR IHC, BRAF V600E, MLH1 methylation) available for patients carrying this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No tumor data available
Not applicable · 13· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/AVariant is an intronic duplication, not a missense substitution and not affecting a non-canonical splice nucleotide with a known pathogenic comparator. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PS4 VCEPPS4 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0; tumor IHC data (PP4) is used instead of proband counting. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PM1 VCEPPM1 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0; there are no recognized mutational hot spots for MMR gene classification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PM4 VCEPPM4 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0; protein length changes from in-frame variants are not used due to lack of evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PM5 N/AVariant is an intronic duplication, not a missense change at an amino acid residue. PM5 requires a missense change at a residue where a different pathogenic missense has been established. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is duplication (intronic)
  • not missense
  • pm5_candidates.json confirms not_applicable
PM6 VCEPPM6 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PP2 VCEPPP2 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0; missense variant in a gene with low rate of benign missense changes does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PP5 VCEPPP5 is designated as Not Applicable for this VCEP by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
BP1 VCEPBP1 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0; missense variant in a gene where only LOF causes disease is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
BP2 VCEPBP2 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0; BS2 is used instead. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
BP3 VCEPBP3 is designated as Not Applicable by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0; in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function is not used. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
BP6 VCEPBP6 is designated as Not Applicable for this VCEP by the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PS5 N/APS5 is not a defined criterion in the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP v2.0.0 framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

Identifiers

Gene
MSH6
Transcript
NM_000179.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000179.3:c.4002-28_4002-26dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000170.1:p.?
GRCh38
chr2:47806750 A>ACTT
GRCh37
chr2:48033889 A>ACTT
ClinVar
926536

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MSH6, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000179.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MSH6NM_000179.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 1,883 / 1,403,604 alleles AF 0.00134 · 6 homozygotes · FAF 0.027
gnomAD v2.1 570 / 226,180 alleles AF 0.00252 · 2 homozygotes · FAF 0.0566
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 0 / 0 alleles AF 0 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 0.0013 · 1883 / 1,403,604 alleles · 6 hom · FAF 0.027
East Asian1159 / 40,910 0.0285 hom
African/African American143 / 59,072 0.00241 hom
Remaining individuals127 / 55,562 0.0023
Admixed American83 / 55,138 0.0015
South Asian81 / 83,322 0.00097
Middle Eastern4 / 5,610 0.00071
European (non-Finnish)283 / 1,016,204 0.00028
European (Finnish)3 / 58,906 5.1e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 2 other groups: Amish, Ashkenazi Jewish.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 0.0025 · 570 / 226,180 alleles · 2 hom · FAF 0.057
East Asian445 / 14,190 0.0312 hom
African/African American57 / 18,028 0.0032
Remaining individuals12 / 5,958 0.002
Admixed American27 / 30,310 0.00089
South Asian12 / 25,840 0.00046
European (non-Finnish)16 / 102,806 0.00016
European (Finnish)1 / 20,050 5e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 1 other group: Ashkenazi Jewish.

gnomAD-Canada

AF 0 · 0 / 0 alleles · 0 hom

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.00134155; MAF= 0.13415%, 1883/1403604 alleles, homozygotes = 6) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.0283305; MAF= 2.83305%, 1159/40910 alleles, homozygotes = 5); grpmax FAF= 0.0269749.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00252012; MAF= 0.25201%, 570/226180 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.0313601; MAF= 3.13601%, 445/14190 alleles, homozygotes = 2); grpmax FAF= 0.0565538.

Open the gnomAD-Canada detail page →

SpliceAI and Pangolin

Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.010
Pangolin splice gain
0.070

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingSpliceAI predicts no splicing impact for this intronic variant (max delta score = 0.00), meeting the VCEP BP4_Supporting threshold of ≤0.1 per Walker et al. 2023. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00
  • VCEP BP4_Supporting threshold: SpliceAI delta ≤ 0.1 for intronic variants
Sources
BP7 SupportingIntronic duplication located at positions -26 and -28 relative to exon 10, which is at or beyond the VCEP BP7 threshold of -21. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant position: c.4002-28_4002-26 (intronic
  • beyond -21 from exon boundary)
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00
  • VCEP BP7 rule: intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7
Sources
PP3 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score = 0.00), below the VCEP PP3_Supporting threshold of ≥0.2 for non-canonical splice variants. HCI prior is not applicable for this non-missense variant. No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (<0.2 threshold)
  • HCI prior not applicable (intronic duplication
  • not missense)
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

2 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    Richards S et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
    Hampel H et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25394175 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.00134155; MAF= 0.13415%, 1883/1403604 alleles, homozygotes = 6) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.0283305; MAF= 2.83305%, 1159/40910 alleles, homozygotes = 5); grpmax FAF= 0.0269749.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00252012; MAF= 0.25201%, 570/226180 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.0313601; MAF= 3.13601%, 445/14190 alleles, homozygotes = 2); grpmax FAF= 0.0565538.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (2 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 926536)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Somatic

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).