0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MBD4 c.1073T>C, p.(Ile358Thr)

NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr) Missense · exon 3 View identifiers
Classification
Benign

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is benign. Select a step to read what it means.

Benign.A benign classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MBD4

MBD4 encodes a DNA glycosylase that detects and repairs deaminated methyl-cytosines in DNA, using a methyl-CpG binding domain to anchor to methylated DNA and a glycosylase domain to carry out mismatch repair in CpG-rich regions. The protein also helps repress transcription from methylated gene promoters. MBD4 acts as a tumor suppressor, and its loss has been linked to colorectal cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and uveal melanoma.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 3
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 3
BA1Stand alone
BA1 · stand alone

Met (stand-alone benign): gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency of 1.01% exceeds the 1% BA1 threshold.

BS1Strong
BS1 · strong

Met (strong benign): allele frequency of 1.01% exceeds the 0.3% BS1 threshold.

BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Met (supporting): REVEL score 0.218 is below the BP4 benign cutoff of 0.250.

Recorded classification: Benign

No MBD4-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework was available, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria applied; BA1 (stand-alone benign) alone establishes Benign, with BS1 and BP4 concordant.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
16,365 / 1,614,030 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 16,365 / 1,614,030 alleles. Recorded AF 0.0101392. Recorded homozygote count 84.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00721936; MAF= 0.72194%, 2041/282712 alleles, homozygotes = 10) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.0112282; MAF= 1.12282%, 81/7214 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.0109125.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.010315995222065371, 190/18418 alleles, homozygotes = 2).

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.218 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.218. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
9 reported laboratory submissions

6 Benign · 3 Likely benign. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MBD4, a DNA glycosylase, is infrequently altered in cancer.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 4 not met · 17 not assessed · 4 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

Generic ACMG/AMP fallback was used because no applicable MBD4-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework was found.

No codon-, residue-, domain-, hotspot-, or missense-mechanism criterion in this requested group could be established from the validated case evidence bundle.

No applicable MBD4-specific ClinGen/VCEP specification was identified, so generic ACMG/AMP population rules were used.

The concordant high frequency across gnomAD v4.1, gnomAD v2.1, and gnomAD-Canada supports BA1 and BS1 and excludes PM2.

Homozygote counts are recorded but are not converted to BS2 because healthy-adult phenotype ascertainment and a validated MBD4 disease model are unavailable.

Met · 3

BA1 Stand aloneMet (stand-alone benign): gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency of 1.01% exceeds the 1% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is too common for a rare, highly penetrant Mendelian disease under the generic fallback population thresholds used for this case. gnomAD v4.1 reports AF 0.0101392 (1.01392%), with a maximum population AF of 0.0121222 (1.21222%) in European non-Finnish individuals; gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada independently also show AFs of approximately 0.72% and 1.03%, respectively. The gnomAD v4.1 overall AF and maximum population AF exceed the 1% BA1 threshold.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: BA1 if population allele frequency is >1% in an appropriate reference population; use the highest credible observed population frequency and consider ancestry-specific maxima.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: 16,365/1,614,030 alleles, AF 0.0101392; maximum reported population AF 0.0121222 in European (non-Finnish) individuals, with 71 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v2.1: 2,041/282,712 alleles, AF 0.00721936; maximum reported population AF 0.0112282, with 10 homozygotes overall.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0: 190/18,418 alleles, AF 0.0103160, with 2 homozygotes.
  • Generic fallback operational threshold applied: BA1 is met when the observed population allele frequency exceeds 1%; the highest-quality large dataset (gnomAD v4.1) exceeds this threshold both overall and in its maximum population group.
Sources
BS1 StrongMet (strong benign): allele frequency of 1.01% exceeds the 0.3% BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Population frequency is above the generic fallback BS1 threshold. gnomAD v4.1 reports AF 1.01392% overall and 1.21222% in the European non-Finnish population; gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada provide concordant frequencies of 0.72194% and 1.03160%. These observations exceed the case's generic non-VCEP BS1 threshold of 0.3%. The frequency is sufficiently high that BS1 is supported independently of any disease-specific prevalence or penetrance estimate.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: BS1 if the allele frequency is greater than the expected maximum for a disorder; in this case, absent a disease-specific model, the operational non-VCEP threshold is >0.3%.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: overall AF 0.0101392 and European non-Finnish AF 0.0121222 (14,304/1,179,986 alleles; 71 homozygotes).
  • gnomAD v2.1: overall AF 0.00721936 and maximum reported population AF 0.0112282 (81/7,214 alleles; 1 homozygote in that subgroup).
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0: AF 0.0103160 (190/18,418 alleles; 2 homozygotes).
  • Generic fallback operational threshold applied: BS1 is met when the observed allele frequency exceeds 0.3% in a relevant population dataset.
Still missing
  • No MBD4-specific ClinGen/VCEP maximum credible population frequency or disease-prevalence/penetrance model was identified; the generic fallback threshold was therefore used.
Sources
BP4 SupportingMet (supporting): REVEL score 0.218 is below the BP4 benign cutoff of 0.250. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is met at supporting strength. This is a missense variant and no MBD4-specific VCEP specification was available, so the generic non-VCEP REVEL-only rule applies. REVEL is 0.218, below the calibrated BP4 cutoff of 0.250. SpliceAI and BayesDel are not additionally counted, preventing duplicate computational evidence and use of an uncalibrated BayesDel threshold.

Rule
generic_acmg_non_vcep_missense: REVEL <0.250 => BP4_supporting; one mechanism only
Evidence considered
  • No MBD4 VCEP/ClinGen gene-specific specification or pre-assigned PP3/BP4 lookup was available; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback therefore governs.
  • The normalized consequence is missense, NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C (NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr)); the generic rule therefore selects the REVEL missense path only.
  • REVEL score is 0.218, below the generic BP4 cutoff of 0.250. The REVEL calibration cutoffs are from ClinGen SVI Bayesian calibration work (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 but is not counted because the selected missense mechanism is REVEL-only; BayesDel is not used because it lacks a verified published threshold in this pipeline.
Sources
revelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules

Not met · 4 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM2 Not met: gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency of 1.01% (84 homozygotes) far exceeds the <0.1% rarity threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is not met because the variant is common in multiple population datasets rather than absent or sufficiently rare. gnomAD v4.1 reports AF 1.01392% overall and 1.21222% in the maximum population group, with 84 homozygotes; gnomAD v2.1 reports AF 0.72194% with 10 homozygotes; and gnomAD-Canada reports AF 1.03160% with 2 homozygotes. These frequencies are far above the generic fallback rarity threshold of <0.1%.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: PM2 requires absence or rarity below 0.1% in appropriate population databases; this variant is not rare.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: AF 0.0101392, maximum population AF 0.0121222, and 84 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v2.1: AF 0.00721936 and 10 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0: AF 0.0103160 and 2 homozygotes.
  • Generic fallback operational threshold applied: PM2 requires rarity below 0.1%; the variant exceeds this threshold by more than an order of magnitude in every available population dataset.
Sources
PP3 Not met: REVEL score 0.218 is below the PP3 threshold of 0.750. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not met. This is a missense variant, so the applicable generic non-VCEP computational path is REVEL alone. The REVEL score of 0.218 is below the PP3 threshold (>0.750) and instead falls below the calibrated BP4 threshold. SpliceAI (max delta 0.00) and BayesDel (-0.358238) were not used to independently assess PP3 because the generic framework prohibits applying splice-path evidence to a missense variant and BayesDel has no verified usable calibration in this pipeline.

Rule
generic_acmg_non_vcep_missense: REVEL >0.750 => PP3_supporting; REVEL <0.250 => BP4_supporting; one mechanism only
Evidence considered
  • No MBD4 VCEP/ClinGen gene-specific specification or pre-assigned PP3/BP4 lookup was available; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback therefore governs.
  • The normalized consequence is missense, NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C (NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr)); the generic rule therefore selects the REVEL missense path only.
  • REVEL score is 0.218. The generic rule assigns REVEL >0.750 to PP3 and REVEL <0.250 to BP4; the REVEL calibration cutoffs are from ClinGen SVI Bayesian calibration work (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.00, but it is not independently counted for this missense variant under the selected REVEL-only mechanism.
  • BayesDel score is -0.358238, but BayesDel is not used because no verified published threshold is available in this pipeline.
Sources
revelspliceai ↗bayesdelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules
PP5 Not met: no ClinVar expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification exists for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact variant has no ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification.

Rule
Apply PP5 only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 1299953 is an exact transcript-HGVS match, but the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions; listed assertions are ordinary laboratory Benign/Likely benign submissions and are ineligible for PP5.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic assertion would be required.
Sources
BP6 Not met: no ClinVar expert-panel benign or likely benign classification exists for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact variant has no ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification.

Rule
Apply BP6 only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 1299953 is an exact transcript-HGVS match and has Benign/Likely benign aggregate assertions, but the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions; ordinary laboratory submissions cannot trigger BP6.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion would be required.
Sources

Not assessed · 17 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no validated report of this same amino-acid change (p.Ile358Thr) as pathogenic was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr), but the case bundle contains no validated report of the same amino-acid change as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The available paper extracts do not mention MBD4 or this variant, and ClinVar submissions are benign or likely benign; those classifications were not used as evidence for PS1. Therefore, PS1 cannot be established from this bundle.

Rule
PS1 requires a well-established pathogenic variant that results in the same amino-acid change as the assessed variant.
Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C, NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr).
  • The extracted full-text findings for PMID:25626707, PMID:23619275, PMID:23169492, and PMID:25741868 do not mention MBD4 or p.Ile358Thr; the latter is a general ACMG/AMP standards paper.
  • ClinVar variation 1299953 contains benign and likely benign submissions and no expert-panel pathogenic assertion; this was not treated as a pathogenicity classification for PS1.
Still missing
  • A reliable report of the same p.Ile358Thr amino-acid change classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic is not available.
  • A curated pathogenic same-codon or same-amino-acid evidence source is not available.
Sources
PS2 Not assessed: no de novo observation of the variant with confirmed maternity and paternity was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband-level de novo observation with confirmed maternity and paternity, parental genotypes, or validated parental absence of NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C is documented in the case-evidence bundle. Therefore PS2 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2 requires a confirmed de novo variant in an affected individual with confirmed maternity and paternity; without parental and proband evidence, assess as not_assessed.
Evidence considered
  • The case-evidence bundle contains variant normalization and population/database results but no proband-specific parental testing, de novo assertion, maternity/paternity confirmation, or parental mosaicism assessment.
  • No fetched paper in paper_extracts.json reports this exact MBD4 variant or a relevant de novo observation.
Still missing
  • Proband phenotype and diagnostic context
  • Maternity and paternity confirmation
  • Parental testing results for NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C
  • Evidence that the variant is absent from both parents
  • Assessment of possible parental mosaicism
PS3 Not assessed: no validated functional assay evidence showing p.Ile358Thr has a damaging effect was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable MBD4-specific VCEP framework was retrieved, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework applies. The case bundle contains no validated functional assay demonstrating that MBD4 p.Ile358Thr causes a damaging effect. OncoKB reports no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence, and the functional-theme papers available in the pre-computed paper extracts do not report this variant or MBD4 assay results. Therefore PS3 cannot be assigned.

Rule
PS3 requires well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect. In the absence of a gene-specific specification, assay validity, controls, biological relevance, and reproducibility must be demonstrated before assigning strength.
Evidence considered
  • The case summary identifies NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C in MBD4, resulting in p.(Ile358Thr), and reports that no ClinGen/VCEP specification was found; generic ACMG/AMP rules therefore apply.
  • OncoKB reports that it did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant and provides only gene-level curated context.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:25626707 states that the paper does not mention MBD4 or this variant and provides no functional assay or variant-specific findings.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:23619275 states that the paper provides no variant-specific or gene-specific functional findings relevant to this variant.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:23169492 states that the paper provides no variant-specific functional findings.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:25741868 describes general ACMG/AMP standards but no MBD4-specific functional result for this variant.
Still missing
  • A validated variant-specific functional assay with appropriate positive and negative controls is not available.
  • No assay result establishes a biologically relevant damaging effect of MBD4 p.Ile358Thr in an appropriate system.
  • No assay-specific calibration or reproducible quantitative result is available to support a PS3 strength level.
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no case-control or cohort data showed enrichment of this variant in affected individuals. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-control or cohort data demonstrate enrichment of MBD4 c.1073T>C (p.Ile358Thr) among affected individuals relative to controls.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS4: significantly increased prevalence in affected individuals compared with controls requires statistically interpretable, phenotype-defined case-control evidence.
Evidence considered
  • The selectively extracted full text for PMID:23169492 is a direct-to-consumer testing policy perspective and reports no MBD4-, c.1073T>C-, or p.(I358T)-specific clinical or population data; it cannot provide case enrichment evidence.
Still missing
  • A phenotype-defined case-control or cohort study reporting exact-variant counts in affected individuals and appropriate controls is needed.
Sources
PM1 Not assessed: no authoritative critical-domain or hotspot evidence covering MBD4 residue 358 was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable MBD4-specific VCEP or CSPEC framework is present. vcep_materials.json has an empty domain_tables object, so there is no authoritative approved critical-domain list to check against residue 358. The bundle also provides no independently validated critical functional-domain or hotspot evidence for MBD4 residue 358.

Rule
PM1 requires a variant located in a mutational hot spot or critical and well-established functional domain, without benign variation; under this case's instructions, an available gene-specific domain table would be authoritative.
Evidence considered
  • The case uses generic ACMG fallback because no MBD4-specific framework was found.
  • vcep_materials.json reports domain_tables as an empty object; therefore no authoritative domain entry covers or excludes residue 358.
  • Cancer Hotspots reports no statistically significant hotspot row for MBD4 I358.
  • OncoKB reports no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence and provides only unreviewed gene-level context.
Still missing
  • An applicable MBD4-specific VCEP/CSPEC domain table or other validated critical functional-domain source is unavailable.
  • Residue 358 cannot be checked against an authoritative complete list of approved MBD4 critical domains.
Sources
PM3 Not assessed: no evidence showed the variant in trans with a pathogenic MBD4 variant in an affected individual. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No ClinGen CSPEC or gene-specific framework was available, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework was used. The case bundle contains no affected-proband observation, second pathogenic or likely pathogenic MBD4 variant, phase determination, or inheritance information demonstrating that NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C (p.Ile358Thr) is in trans with a pathogenic variant in an affected individual. The available population and ClinVar records do not establish PM3 and cannot substitute for phase or affected-proband evidence.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM3: for a recessive disorder, the variant is observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in an affected individual; phase and clinical context must be established.
Evidence considered
  • The case summary identifies the framework mode as generic_acmg and records that no CSPEC was found for MBD4.
  • The consolidated evidence bundle contains no affected-proband, compound-heterozygous, trans-phase, cis-phase, parental-segregation, or inheritance observation for this variant.
  • The generic ACMG/AMP framework requires recessive allelic evidence involving a pathogenic variant in trans in an affected individual; that evidence is absent here.
Still missing
  • Affected-proband case data are not provided.
  • No second pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is documented for a potentially recessive MBD4 disorder.
  • Phase information (in trans or in cis) is not provided.
  • Inheritance mode and parental segregation are not provided.
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM5 Not assessed: no verified pathogenic missense variant at the same residue was available for comparison. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The assessed change is p.Ile358Thr. The case bundle contains no verified pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense comparator at the same residue, and pm5_candidates.json reports zero harvested candidates while explicitly stating that classic same-residue PM5 semantics could not be safely confirmed. PM5 therefore cannot be applied from the available evidence.

Rule
PM5 requires a novel missense change at an amino-acid residue where a different missense change is established as pathogenic.
Evidence considered
  • pm5_candidates.json identifies residue 358 and reports zero total and zero same-residue candidates; it recommends review rather than applying PM5.
  • ClinVar variation 1299953 is the assessed p.Ile358Thr variant and does not provide a verified pathogenic same-residue comparator.
Still missing
  • A verified pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense variant at residue Ile358 is not available.
  • The automatic PM5 candidate artifact contains no same-residue candidates and does not establish PM5 eligibility.
Sources
pm5_candidatesclinvar ↗
PM6 Not assessed: no case or literature evidence documents the variant as de novo. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case or literature evidence documents NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C as apparently de novo without confirmed maternity and paternity. The available literature extracts do not contain this variant or a relevant family observation. Therefore PM6 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6 applies to an apparently de novo occurrence when maternity and paternity are not confirmed; absent a documented affected case and de novo observation, assess as not_assessed.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated bundle provides no apparently de novo case observation for NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C.
  • paper_extracts.json reports that the fetched papers do not mention MBD4 c.1073T>C, p.(I358T), or a relevant de novo or segregation result.
Still missing
  • A specific affected individual carrying the exact variant
  • Parental testing or a documented de novo claim
  • Confirmed maternity and paternity
  • Source-level details for the observation and testing methodology
PP1 Not assessed: no family segregation data for the variant were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected relatives, informative meioses, phase data, or family segregation results for NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C are provided. The available evidence is insufficient to evaluate co-segregation with disease, so PP1 is not assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1 requires co-segregation of the variant with disease in multiple affected family members, interpreted using informative meioses and phenotype certainty; no family data are available here.
Evidence considered
  • The case-evidence bundle contains no pedigree, affected-relative testing, informative meiosis count, or segregation result for this variant.
  • The literature extracts contain no exact-variant family segregation observation relevant to PP1.
Still missing
  • Pedigree and relationship information
  • Number of informative meioses
  • Genotypes of affected and unaffected relatives
  • Phenotype consistency and disease-status ascertainment
  • Phase and segregation methodology
PP2 Not assessed: no evidence established that benign missense variation is uncommon in MBD4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No MBD4-specific framework or validated missense-spectrum analysis is available to establish both PP2 requirements: that missense variation is a recognized disease mechanism for MBD4 and that benign missense variation is unusually uncommon. The bundle supports MBD4 loss-of-function context in a separate gene-context artifact, but that does not by itself establish PP2 for this missense variant. PP2 is not applied.

Rule
PP2 requires a missense mechanism in the relevant gene and a low rate of benign missense variation in that gene; both components must be supported independently.
Evidence considered
  • The available gene-context artifact supports a loss-of-function mechanism for MBD4, but it does not demonstrate that missense variants are the predominant disease mechanism or that benign missense variation is rare.
  • No MBD4-specific VCEP/CSPEC rule modifies or supports PP2.
Still missing
  • A validated MBD4 missense-disease mechanism is not established in the available group evidence.
  • A validated analysis demonstrating a low benign missense rate for MBD4 is not available.
Sources
pvs1_gene_contextgeneric_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗
PP4 Not assessed: no phenotype or clinical context data were provided. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband phenotype, diagnostic testing context, or evidence that the observed phenotype is highly specific for an MBD4-related disorder is provided.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP4: a patient's phenotype or family history must be highly specific for disease with a single genetic etiology.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no patient-level phenotype or diagnostic-workup information for the carrier of c.1073T>C.
Still missing
  • Detailed proband phenotype and family history are needed.
  • Evidence is needed that the reported phenotype is highly specific for MBD4-related disease and has a sufficiently narrow differential diagnosis.
BS2 Not assessed: homozygote counts in population databases alone do not establish that healthy adults were observed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is observed in homozygous individuals in gnomAD v4.1 (84 overall; 71 in European non-Finnish individuals), gnomAD v2.1 (10 overall), and gnomAD-Canada (2). However, the case bundle does not establish that these individuals were healthy adults assessed for the relevant MBD4-associated phenotype, and it does not provide a validated MBD4 inheritance model, disease prevalence, or penetrance estimate that would define how homozygosity should be interpreted. Population-database homozygote counts alone therefore do not satisfy the generic BS2 requirement for observations in healthy adults.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS2 requires observation in healthy adults in the genotype configuration relevant to the disease model; an unphenotyped population-database homozygote count is insufficient by itself.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 84 homozygotes overall and 71 homozygotes among European non-Finnish individuals.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 10 homozygotes overall; gnomAD-Canada reports 2 homozygotes.
  • The available population records provide allele counts and homozygote counts but no individual-level phenotype ascertainment or confirmation that carriers were healthy for the relevant MBD4 phenotype.
Still missing
  • No phenotype-confirmed healthy-adult status is available for the reported homozygotes.
  • No validated MBD4 disease inheritance model and penetrance estimate is available to determine whether these homozygous observations meet the BS2 configuration for the relevant disorder.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no functional assay evidence showing the variant preserves normal protein function was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable MBD4-specific VCEP framework was retrieved, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework applies. The case bundle contains no validated functional assay showing that MBD4 p.Ile358Thr has a normal or non-damaging effect. OncoKB reports no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence, and the available functional-theme papers do not report this variant or relevant MBD4 assay results. Therefore BS3 cannot be assigned.

Rule
BS3 requires well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function or a validated normal functional result. In the absence of a gene-specific specification, assay validity, controls, biological relevance, and reproducibility must be demonstrated before assigning strength.
Evidence considered
  • The case summary identifies NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C in MBD4, resulting in p.(Ile358Thr), and reports that no ClinGen/VCEP specification was found; generic ACMG/AMP rules therefore apply.
  • OncoKB reports that it did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant and provides only gene-level curated context.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:25626707 states that the paper does not mention MBD4 or this variant and provides no functional assay or variant-specific findings.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:23619275 states that the paper provides no variant-specific or gene-specific functional findings relevant to this variant.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:23169492 states that the paper provides no variant-specific functional findings.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:25741868 describes general ACMG/AMP standards but no MBD4-specific functional result for this variant.
Still missing
  • A validated variant-specific functional assay with appropriate controls demonstrating a normal or non-damaging effect is not available.
  • No biologically relevant assay demonstrates preserved MBD4 function for p.Ile358Thr.
  • No assay-specific calibration or reproducible quantitative result is available to support a BS3 strength level.
Sources
BS4 Not assessed: no at-risk relatives were tested, so non-segregation could not be evaluated. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No unaffected relatives known to be at risk have been tested for NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C, and no reliable non-segregation result is documented. The absence of family data prevents evaluation of BS4.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4 requires lack of segregation in affected families, such as the variant being observed in unaffected relatives when disease status is reliable; without informative family data, assess as not_assessed.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle does not document testing of unaffected relatives or non-segregation of the exact variant.
  • Population frequency and ClinVar submissions are not family non-segregation evidence and were not used to assess BS4.
Still missing
  • Pedigree and disease-status information
  • Genotypes of unaffected relatives at risk
  • Phenotype ascertainment and age-related penetrance context
  • Number and informativeness of non-segregating relatives
  • Testing quality and variant-detection methodology
BP1 Not assessed: no variant-spectrum evidence established that missense changes do not cause MBD4 disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The bundle contains evidence consistent with MBD4 loss-of-function disease biology, but it does not establish that MBD4-related disease is caused primarily by truncating variants with missense variants not known to cause disease. The available case-specific literature extracts contain no relevant MBD4 variant-spectrum evidence. BP1 is therefore not applied.

Rule
BP1 requires a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease and for which missense variants are not a known disease mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • The gene-context artifact supports MBD4 loss of function as a germline disease mechanism, but that alone is insufficient for BP1's requirement that missense variants are not a known disease mechanism.
  • The extracted full-text findings for PMID:25626707, PMID:23619275, PMID:23169492, and PMID:25741868 provide no MBD4 missense-spectrum evidence.
Still missing
  • A sufficiently comprehensive MBD4 variant-spectrum review showing predominant truncating disease variants and absence of established pathogenic missense variants is unavailable.
  • The available evidence does not define whether missense variation is an established MBD4 disease mechanism.
Sources
BP2 Not assessed: no evidence placed this variant in cis or trans with another pathogenic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No ClinGen CSPEC or gene-specific framework was available, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework was used. The case bundle contains no documented affected or unaffected individual carrying NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C (p.Ile358Thr) with another pathogenic variant, and no phase information showing the variants are in trans or cis in a context that would support BP2. Therefore BP2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP2: assess only when the variant is observed with another pathogenic variant in a documented allelic context (cis or trans) relevant to the disorder and inheritance model; phase and clinical context are required.
Evidence considered
  • The case summary identifies the framework mode as generic_acmg and records that no CSPEC was found for MBD4.
  • The consolidated evidence bundle contains no documented cis/trans relationship between this variant and another pathogenic variant in any individual.
  • Population frequency, ClinVar classification, and gene-level background information do not establish the individual-level phase and inheritance context required to evaluate BP2.
Still missing
  • No individual-level allelic observation relevant to BP2 is provided.
  • No second pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is documented.
  • Phase information is not provided.
  • Phenotype, penetrance, and inheritance context are not provided.
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP5 Not assessed: no evidence of an alternate cause of disease in a tested individual was provided. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected individual, phenotype, or independently established molecular diagnosis is provided to evaluate whether this variant occurs with an alternate cause of disease.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP5: a variant is found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no patient-level alternate molecular diagnosis or phenotype information.
Still missing
  • Patient-level phenotype and complete molecular testing results are needed to assess whether an alternative molecular diagnosis fully explains the presentation.
Not applicable · 4· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: this missense change is not one of the null variant classes (nonsense, frameshift, splice-site) that PVS1 covers. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C in MBD4 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM4 N/ANot applicable: this missense change does not alter protein length, which PM4 requires. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C in MBD4 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: this missense change is not an in-frame insertion/deletion in a repeat region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C in MBD4 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this missense change is not a synonymous variant, which BP7 requires. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C in MBD4 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
MBD4
Transcript
NM_001276270.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr)
GRCh38
chr3:129436571 A>G
GRCh37
chr3:129155414 A>G
Location and type
Exon 3 · missense
ClinVar
1299953

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MBD4, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_001276270.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MBD4NM_001276270.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 16,365 / 1,614,030 alleles AF 0.0101 · 84 homozygotes · FAF 0.012
gnomAD v2.1 2,041 / 282,712 alleles AF 0.00722 · 10 homozygotes · FAF 0.0109
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 0.01 · 16365 / 1,614,030 alleles · 84 hom · FAF 0.012
European (non-Finnish)14304 / 1,179,986 0.01271 hom
Middle Eastern66 / 6,062 0.0113 hom
Remaining individuals662 / 62,506 0.0115 hom
Ashkenazi Jewish266 / 29,600 0.009
Amish7 / 912 0.0077
Admixed American460 / 60,030 0.00773 hom
European (Finnish)185 / 64,012 0.0029
South Asian258 / 91,082 0.00282 hom
African/African American156 / 75,002 0.0021
East Asian1 / 44,838 2.2e-05

gnomAD v2.1

AF 0.0072 · 2041 / 282,712 alleles · 10 hom · FAF 0.011
Remaining individuals81 / 7,214 0.0111 hom
European (non-Finnish)1425 / 129,070 0.0118 hom
Ashkenazi Jewish106 / 10,368 0.01
Admixed American230 / 35,420 0.00651 hom
South Asian88 / 30,612 0.0029
European (Finnish)68 / 25,120 0.0027
African/African American43 / 24,954 0.0017
0 alternate alleles recorded in 1 other group: East Asian.

gnomAD-Canada

AF not recorded · ? / ? alleles

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.0101392; MAF= 1.01392%, 16365/1614030 alleles, homozygotes = 84) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.0121222; MAF= 1.21222%, 14304/1179986 alleles, homozygotes = 71); grpmax FAF= 0.0119554.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00721936; MAF= 0.72194%, 2041/282712 alleles, homozygotes = 10) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.0112282; MAF= 1.12282%, 81/7214 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.0109125.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.010315995222065371, 190/18418 alleles, homozygotes = 2).

Open the gnomAD-Canada detail page →

SpliceAI and Pangolin

Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.001
Pangolin splice gain
0.006

Other predictors

REVEL
0.218
BayesDel
-0.358

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingMet (supporting): REVEL score 0.218 is below the BP4 benign cutoff of 0.250. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is met at supporting strength. This is a missense variant and no MBD4-specific VCEP specification was available, so the generic non-VCEP REVEL-only rule applies. REVEL is 0.218, below the calibrated BP4 cutoff of 0.250. SpliceAI and BayesDel are not additionally counted, preventing duplicate computational evidence and use of an uncalibrated BayesDel threshold.

Rule
generic_acmg_non_vcep_missense: REVEL <0.250 => BP4_supporting; one mechanism only
Evidence considered
  • No MBD4 VCEP/ClinGen gene-specific specification or pre-assigned PP3/BP4 lookup was available; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback therefore governs.
  • The normalized consequence is missense, NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C (NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr)); the generic rule therefore selects the REVEL missense path only.
  • REVEL score is 0.218, below the generic BP4 cutoff of 0.250. The REVEL calibration cutoffs are from ClinGen SVI Bayesian calibration work (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 but is not counted because the selected missense mechanism is REVEL-only; BayesDel is not used because it lacks a verified published threshold in this pipeline.
Sources
revelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules
PP3 Not met: REVEL score 0.218 is below the PP3 threshold of 0.750. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not met. This is a missense variant, so the applicable generic non-VCEP computational path is REVEL alone. The REVEL score of 0.218 is below the PP3 threshold (>0.750) and instead falls below the calibrated BP4 threshold. SpliceAI (max delta 0.00) and BayesDel (-0.358238) were not used to independently assess PP3 because the generic framework prohibits applying splice-path evidence to a missense variant and BayesDel has no verified usable calibration in this pipeline.

Rule
generic_acmg_non_vcep_missense: REVEL >0.750 => PP3_supporting; REVEL <0.250 => BP4_supporting; one mechanism only
Evidence considered
  • No MBD4 VCEP/ClinGen gene-specific specification or pre-assigned PP3/BP4 lookup was available; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback therefore governs.
  • The normalized consequence is missense, NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C (NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr)); the generic rule therefore selects the REVEL missense path only.
  • REVEL score is 0.218. The generic rule assigns REVEL >0.750 to PP3 and REVEL <0.250 to BP4; the REVEL calibration cutoffs are from ClinGen SVI Bayesian calibration work (PMID:36413997).
  • SpliceAI max delta is 0.00, but it is not independently counted for this missense variant under the selected REVEL-only mechanism.
  • BayesDel score is -0.358238, but BayesDel is not used because no verified published threshold is available in this pipeline.
Sources
revelspliceai ↗bayesdelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this missense change is not a synonymous variant, which BP7 requires. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_001276270.2:c.1073T>C in MBD4 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(Ile358Thr). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.218. BayesDel score = -0.358238.

7 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening.
    This paper is an ACMG policy statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. It does not mention MBD4, c.1073T>C, or NP_001263199.1:p.(I358T), and provides no variant-specific, gene-specific, functional, clinical, segregation, or population-frequency findings relevant to this variant.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 23619275 ↗
  • Whole-genome sequencing in newborn screening? A statement on the continued importance of targeted approaches in newborn screening programmes.
    Howard HC et al. · 2015
    The paper does not mention MBD4, c.1073T>C, NP_001263199.1:p.(I358T), or any MBD4-related mechanism, functional assay, case observation, segregation result, or population-frequency data. It is a policy and ethics statement about the potential use of next-generation or genome sequencing in newborn screening.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25626707 ↗
  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    The paper does not mention MBD4 or the specific c.1073T>C (p.(I358T)) variant. It presents general ACMG/AMP standards for evaluating sequence variants in Mendelian genes, including guidance on population data, functional studies, computational predictions, and combining evidence; it provides no MBD4-specific functional results, case observations, segregation data, or population-frequency information for this variant.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25741868 ↗
    Quoted passage
    The variant classification approach described in this paper is meant to be applicable to variants in all Mendelian genes whether identified by single gene tests, multi-gene panels, exome sequencing or genome sequencing.

    Proposed Criteria for Interpretation of Sequence Variants, paragraph 3

  • The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.
    Fears R et al. · 2013
    This paper is a policy perspective on direct-to-consumer genetic testing and does not mention MBD4, the c.1073T>C variant, or the p.(I358T) protein change. It provides no variant-specific functional, clinical, segregation, or population data.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 23169492 ↗
  • Newborn screening: education, consent, and the residual blood spot. The position of the national society of genetic counselors.
    Blout C et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23881473 ↗
  • Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].
    Skirton H et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24022298 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.0101392; MAF= 1.01392%, 16365/1614030 alleles, homozygotes = 84) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.0121222; MAF= 1.21222%, 14304/1179986 alleles, homozygotes = 71); grpmax FAF= 0.0119554.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00721936; MAF= 0.72194%, 2041/282712 alleles, homozygotes = 10) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.0112282; MAF= 1.12282%, 81/7214 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.0109125.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.010315995222065371, 190/18418 alleles, homozygotes = 2).

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (6 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (3 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 1299953)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.218. BayesDel score = -0.358238.

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MBD4, a DNA glycosylase, is infrequently altered in cancer.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.