0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

ATM c.5515C>T, p.(Gln1839Ter)

NM_000051.3:c.5515C>T NP_000042.3:p.(Gln1839Ter) View identifiers
Classification
Pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Pathogenic.A pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About ATM

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.5.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 4 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 4
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

This nonsense variant introduces a premature termination codon at p.Gln1839Ter (p.Q1839*), well upstream of the 3' end of ATM, and ATM loss of function is an established disease mechanism in the applicable ATM VCEP framework. The ATM PVS1 guidance supports full-strength PVS1 for a truncating variant of this type.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at an overall allele frequency of 8.674886328007367e-06 (0.00087%; 14/1613854 alleles) with 0 homozygotes, which is below the ATM PM2_Supporting threshold of 0.001%. This supports PM2 at supporting strength.

PM5Supporting
PM5 · supporting

The ATM VCEP specifies PM5_Supporting for truncating variants with a premature termination codon upstream of p.Arg3047. This variant creates p.Gln1839Ter, which is upstream of p.Arg3047, so PM5 is met at supporting strength.

PP5Supporting
PP5 · supporting

Expert panel ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Pathogenic.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Pathogenic

Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v1.5.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule4 (1 Pathogenic.Very Strong + Pathogenic.Supporting >=2) with applied criteria: PVS1 very strong, PM2 supporting, PM5 supporting, PP5 supporting; maps to Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
14 / 1,613,854 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 14 / 1,613,854 alleles. Recorded AF 8.67489e-06. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

No listed criterion applied
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.5.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 4 met · 4 not met · 6 not assessed · 14 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The ATM c.5515C>T (p.Gln1839Ter; p.Q1839*) variant has been reported in ClinVar as pathogenic, including expert panel review.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at a very low overall allele frequency of 0.00087% (14/1613854 alleles) with no homozygotes, which is below the ATM PM2_Supporting threshold of 0.001%.

This nonsense variant introduces a premature stop codon at residue 1839, and the ATM VCEP PVS1 framework supports loss of function as a disease mechanism for ATM.

SpliceAI predicts no strong splice effect for this variant (max delta score 0.16), which is below the ATM PP3 splicing threshold of 0.2 and above the BP4 threshold of 0.1, so computational evidence does not independently change the interpretation.

Met · 4

PVS1 Very strongThis nonsense variant introduces a premature termination codon at p.Gln1839Ter (p.Q1839*), well upstream of the 3' end of ATM, and ATM loss of function is an established disease mechanism in the applicable ATM VCEP framework. The ATM PVS1 guidance supports full-strength PVS1 for a truncating variant of this type. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP PVS1 decision tree for null variants in ATM
Evidence considered
  • ATM-specific PVS1 decision framework
  • ATM loss-of-function disease mechanism
  • nonsense consequence
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_pvs1_1_5pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessment
PM2 SupportingThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at an overall allele frequency of 8.674886328007367e-06 (0.00087%; 14/1613854 alleles) with 0 homozygotes, which is below the ATM PM2_Supporting threshold of 0.001%. This supports PM2 at supporting strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM2_Supporting: frequency ≤0.001% in gnomAD v4
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 absence
  • gnomAD v4.1 rarity threshold
Sources
PM5 SupportingThe ATM VCEP specifies PM5_Supporting for truncating variants with a premature termination codon upstream of p.Arg3047. This variant creates p.Gln1839Ter, which is upstream of p.Arg3047, so PM5 is met at supporting strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM5_Supporting for truncating variants upstream of p.Arg3047
Evidence considered
  • ATM truncating-variant PM5 rule
  • protein position p.Gln1839Ter
Sources
PP5 SupportingExpert panel ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
  • ClinVar expert panel classification
Sources

Not met · 4 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PP3 SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.16, which is below the ATM PP3 splicing threshold of 0.2. REVEL is not available because this is not a missense variant, and the available BayesDel score does not substitute for the ATM VCEP PP3 rule. PP3 is therefore not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PP3: missense REVEL >0.7333 or splicing SpliceAI ≥0.2 in eligible variant classes
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI score 0.16
  • absence of REVEL for nonsense variant
  • ATM PP3 thresholds
Sources
BA1 The gnomAD v4.1 frequency for this variant is 0.00087%, which is far below the ATM BA1 threshold of greater than 0.5%. BA1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BA1: grpmax filtering AF >0.5% in gnomAD v4
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 frequency
  • ATM BA1 threshold
Sources
BS1 The highest observed frequency remains well below the ATM BS1 threshold of greater than 0.05% in gnomAD v4. Available population data do not support BS1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BS1: grpmax filtering AF >0.05% in gnomAD v4
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 rarity
  • ATM BS1 threshold
Sources
BP4 SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.16, which is above the ATM BP4 no-splice-impact threshold of 0.1. The missense-based REVEL rule is not applicable to this nonsense variant. BP4 is therefore not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP4: missense REVEL ≤0.249 or splicing SpliceAI ≤0.1 in eligible variant classes
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI score 0.16
  • ATM BP4 thresholds
Sources

Not assessed · 6 · no assessment recorded

PS3 Published studies reviewed describe ATM loss of function and radiosensitivity in affected cells more broadly, but no validated variant-specific rescue assay was identified for this variant. The ATM VCEP also notes that phenotypic evidence such as deficient ATM activity in patient cells should not be used alone as functional evidence for PS3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PS3 requires failure to rescue ATM-specific function and/or radiosensitivity in appropriate assays
Evidence considered
  • ATM PS3/BS3 rule text
  • reviewed ATM functional literature
Still missing
  • No variant-specific rescue assay result was identified.
  • No ATM-specific functional assay meeting the VCEP PS3 requirements was identified for this exact variant.
Sources
PS4 This variant has been reported in ClinVar, but no case-control study, odds ratio, or exact-variant enrichment statistic meeting the ATM PS4 requirement was identified. Available evidence does not establish PS4 at this time. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PS4 requires case-control evidence with p-value ≤0.05 and OR/HR/RR ≥2 or lower 95% CI ≥1.5
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar observations
  • ATM PS4 rule
Still missing
  • No qualifying case-control statistic was identified.
  • No exact-variant enrichment analysis meeting the ATM PS4 threshold was identified.
Sources
PM3 No confirmed observations of this variant in trans with a pathogenic ATM variant in an affected individual were identified, so PM3 cannot be assigned from the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM3 point system
Evidence considered
  • ATM PM3 point-based framework
  • available case-level summaries
Still missing
  • No phased in trans observation was identified.
  • No qualifying proband scoring information was identified under the ATM PM3 point system.
Sources
vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5clinvar ↗
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 cannot be assigned. The available evidence does not show segregation with an ATM-related recessive phenotype in informative relatives. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PP1 requires segregation in affected relatives for the recessive condition
Evidence considered
  • ATM PP1 segregation thresholds
  • available case summaries
Still missing
  • No informative family segregation data were identified.
  • No count of affected segregations meeting ATM PP1 thresholds was identified.
Sources
BS3 No variant-specific assay showing rescue of ATM-specific function or radiosensitivity was identified. Available evidence does not support BS3 for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BS3 requires rescue of ATM-specific function and/or radiosensitivity in appropriate assays
Evidence considered
  • ATM BS3 rule text
  • reviewed ATM functional literature
Still missing
  • No qualifying rescue assay was identified for this exact variant.
Sources
BP2 No confirmed co-occurrence of this variant in trans with a pathogenic ATM variant in an unaffected individual was identified, so BP2 cannot be assigned from the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP2 point system
Evidence considered
  • ATM BP2 point-based framework
  • available case-level summaries
Still missing
  • No qualifying unaffected in trans co-occurrence data were identified.
  • No ATM BP2 point total could be established.
Sources
vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5clinvar ↗
Not applicable · 14· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/AATM PS1 guidance is written for missense changes producing the same amino acid substitution or for splice variants with the same predicted or observed splice event. This variant is a nonsense substitution, so PS1 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PS1 specification
Evidence considered
  • ATM PS1 missense/splicing rules
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_ps1_1_5
PS2 N/APS2 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification, so de novo evidence is not used under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
PM1 N/APM1 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification, so hotspot or critical-domain localization is not used as PM1 evidence in this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
PM4 N/AATM PM4 is specified for stop-loss variants. This variant is a nonsense change, so PM4 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM4 applies to stop-loss variants
Evidence considered
  • ATM PM4 rule
Sources
PM6 N/APM6 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification, so assumed de novo evidence is not used under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
PP2 N/APP2 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
PP4 N/APP4 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
BS2 N/ABS2 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
BS4 N/ABS4 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
BP1 N/ABP1 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
BP3 N/ABP3 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
BP5 N/ABP5 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
BP6 N/ABP6 is marked not applicable in the ATM VCEP specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM VCEP applicability
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP applicability table
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is specified for synonymous and deep intronic variants. This variant is a nonsense coding change, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP7 applies to synonymous and deep intronic variants
Evidence considered
  • ATM BP7 rule
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
ATM
Transcript
NM_000051.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000051.3:c.5515C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000042.3:p.(Gln1839Ter)
GRCh38
chr11:108304693 C>T
GRCh37
chr11:108175420 C>T

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in ATM, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000051.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

ATMNM_000051.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 14 / 1,613,854 alleles AF 8.67e-06 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 6.89e-06
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 8.7e-06 · 14 / 1,613,854 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 6.9e-06
European (non-Finnish)14 / 1,179,904 1.2e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 8.67489e-06; MAF= 0.00087%, 14/1613854 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.18654e-05; MAF= 0.00119%, 14/1179904 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 6.89e-06.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.16, which is below the ATM PP3 splicing threshold of 0.2. REVEL is not available because this is not a missense variant, and the available BayesDel score does not substitute for the ATM VCEP PP3 rule. PP3 is therefore not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PP3: missense REVEL >0.7333 or splicing SpliceAI ≥0.2 in eligible variant classes
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI score 0.16
  • absence of REVEL for nonsense variant
  • ATM PP3 thresholds
Sources
BP4 SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.16, which is above the ATM BP4 no-splice-impact threshold of 0.1. The missense-based REVEL rule is not applicable to this nonsense variant. BP4 is therefore not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP4: missense REVEL ≤0.249 or splicing SpliceAI ≤0.1 in eligible variant classes
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI score 0.16
  • ATM BP4 thresholds
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is specified for synonymous and deep intronic variants. This variant is a nonsense coding change, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP7 applies to synonymous and deep intronic variants
Evidence considered
  • ATM BP7 rule
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.16). BayesDel score = 0.652534.

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 8.67489e-06; MAF= 0.00087%, 14/1613854 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.18654e-05; MAF= 0.00119%, 14/1179904 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 6.89e-06.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (8 clinical laboratories) and as Pathogenic by ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen (expert panel).

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.16). BayesDel score = 0.652534.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53732966, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.