0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

ATM c.273dup, p.(Lys92GlufsTer8)

NM_000051.4:c.273dup NP_000042.3:p.(Lys92GlufsTer8) View identifiers
Classification
Pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Pathogenic.A pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About ATM

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.5. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 3 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 3
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

PVS1 (Very Strong): This one-base duplication in exon 4 of ATM shifts the reading frame (p.Lys92GlufsTer8) and creates a premature stop codon at residue 99 of the 3,056-residue protein, which is predicted to trigger nonsense-mediated decay. Loss-of-function is an established disease mechanism for ATM, and the variant is absent from population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada).

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

PM2 (Supporting): the variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1 exomes, and from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, placing it well below the expert panel's 0.001% frequency threshold.

PM5Supporting
PM5 · supporting

PM5 (Supporting): the frameshift produces a premature stop codon at residue 99, far upstream of the most C-terminal known pathogenic ATM residue (p.Arg3047), satisfying the expert panel's truncation-cutoff rule.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Pathogenic

The classification was made under the ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Expert Panel specifications for ATM, version 1.5, which serve as the primary authority. Three criteria are met: PVS1 (Very Strong) for a frameshift null variant predicted to trigger nonsense-mediated decay, PM2 (Supporting) for absence from population databases, and PM5 (Supporting) for a premature stop codon upstream of the most C-terminal known pathogenic residue (p.Arg3047). Under the panel's combination rules (Rule 4), one very strong pathogenic criterion plus at least two supporting pathogenic criteria yields a Pathogenic classification. No benign criteria are met, so no conflicting-evidence rule is triggered; the standard ACMG/AMP framework would reach the same conclusion.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.5, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 6 not met · 4 not assessed · 15 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

PVS1 met at Very Strong: frameshift null variant (c.273dup; p.Lys92GlufsTer8) in constitutive exon 4 of ATM with an NMD-predicted PTC at residue 99, far upstream of p.Arg3047 and the 3' end; LoF is an established ATM disease mechanism per ATM VCEP v1.5 PVS1 decision guide.

PM4 not applicable: ATM VCEP v1.5 limits PM4 to stop-loss variants; this is an out-of-frame frameshift, and its protein-length consequence is already captured by PVS1.

BP3 not applicable: ATM VCEP v1.5 explicitly disallows BP3 ('Do not use'); the variant is not an in-frame indel in a repeat region.

No consequence-based benign evidence exists: SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta 0.00), so the frameshift is the sole consequence; no alternative in-frame transcript rescue is supported by the VCEP constitutive-exon note.

Variant NM_000051.4:c.273dup is a frameshift duplication in ATM exon 4 producing p.(Lys92GlufsTer8) (PTC at codon ~99). Governing framework is the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC (doc 639508985), which takes precedence over generic ACMG for all five criteria in this group.

Only one criterion in this group is met: PM5 (Supporting), via the VCEP's truncation-cutoff rule for frameshifting variants with premature termination codons upstream of p.Arg3047. This is the VCEP-repurposed PM5, explicitly PM5_Supporting (not moderate), and is independent of the PVS1 code handled by the null-variant group.

PS1 is not applicable because the VCEP restricts it to missense (same amino-acid change) and splice-region variants, and this variant is neither (frameshift duplication; SpliceAI max delta 0.00).

PM1, PP2, and BP1 are each explicitly 'Not applicable' in the ATM VCEP v1.5 ruleset (no defined hotspots/domains for PM1; no defined low rate of benign missense for PP2; known missense pathogenic variants preclude BP1). All three are also structurally inapplicable to a non-missense frameshift variant.

No retrieved literature is relevant to this group: the three ONCOKB-sourced functional reviews (PMID 27413114, 30348496, 30553448) do not mention c.273dup, p.K92Efs*8, or residue K92, and were not consulted for codon/residue/domain criteria. All determinations here rest on the VCEP ruleset (cspec) and pipeline artifacts (pm5_candidates).

PS2 and PM6 are not applicable under the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 specification, and no de novo occurrence of c.273dup (confirmed or presumed) has been reported in ClinVar or the retrieved literature.

PP1 (AR-condition segregation) is defined by the ATM VCEP but cannot be assessed because the case contains no proband phenotype, family history, parental testing, or affected-relative segregation data for NM_000051.4:c.273dup, and the variant is absent from ClinVar and all retrieved publications.

BS4 is not applicable under the ATM VCEP v1.5 specification, and no non-segregation data are available.

PS3 and BS3 are both not_assessed for NM_000051.4:c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8, frameshift): the case bundle contains no variant-specific functional assay evidence from any VCEP-approved assay.

The ATM VCEP v1.5 approved-assay calibration table (clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx) was read in full; it calibrates PS3_Supporting/BS3_Supporting (kinase activity: Mitui 2009, Barone 2009, Scott 2002) and PS3_Moderate (radiosensitivity, only combinable with a kinase result) but explicitly states it is not a per-variant results table and requires confirming the variant in the cited papers. None of the three approved papers are in this case's bundle, and no report of c.273dup in them was found.

Sun et al. 2025 (PMID 40580951) Suppl Table S1 was directly inspected: it is an SNV-only saturation screen (~29,374 rows, single-nucleotide Ref/Alt). c.273dup is a duplication and has no row (closest entries at the same position are c.272A>G/C/T and c.273G>A/C/T, all SNVs), so no DeepATM_predicted/Combined_score/Classification readout is applicable to this variant.

OncoKB's 'Likely Loss-of-function' biological-effect label is a curated annotation (somatic-cancer context), not well-established functional assay evidence; it was considered and rejected for both PS3 and BS3.

The three OncoKB-sourced publications (PMID 27413114, 30348496, 30553448) were full-text reviewed: none mention c.273dup/p.Lys92GlufsTer8, so under the strict citation-grounding policy they cannot be cited for PS3/BS3 (general gene-level ATM biology discussion does not count).

Because no functional data exists for either direction, both criteria remain not_assessed and neither contributes to the final classification; no PS3/BS3 strength is assigned.

Governing framework: ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer (HBOP) ATM VCEP v1.5 (CSPEC doc 639508985). PS4 is applicable with a case-control enrichment threshold; PP4, PP5, BP5, and BP6 are explicitly declared Not Applicable.

PS4 not assessed: no case-control or cohort study reporting enrichment of c.273dup exists in the evidence bundle, and the variant is absent from ClinVar, gnomAD v2.1/v4.1/gnomAD-Canada, and COSMIC. The three retrieved full texts (PMID:27413114, PMID:30348496, PMID:30553448) are functional/review papers and do not mention the variant; absence of any variant-specific case-control study is an evidence gap, not a demonstrated lack of association.

PP4 not applicable: the VCEP explicitly bars PP4 for ATM (recessive A-T phenotype evidence is built into the PM3/BP2 points table; breast cancer phenotype has multiple genetic etiologies), and no proband phenotype data for this variant exists in the bundle.

PP5/BP6 not applicable: the VCEP declares both Not Applicable, and the variant is entirely absent from ClinVar, so no exact-variant expert-panel Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic or Benign/Likely Benign classification exists to trigger either criterion even under the global ClinVar-3-star override.

BP5 not applicable: the VCEP declares BP5 Not Applicable, and no alternate-genetic-cause case data involving this variant exists.

Variant is absent from all queried population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, gnomAD-Canada) and ClinVar, providing no prevalence-based enrichment signal relevant to PS4.

Governing framework: ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 (cspec found, framework_mode=vcep). PM3/BP2 are adjudicated exclusively via the VCEP points-based table (vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5), which applies regardless of variant class; no generic ACMG fallback needed.

Variant: NM_000051.4:c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8 / p.K92Efs*8), ATM frameshift in exon 4; variant is completely absent from ClinVar (zero submissions), gnomAD v2.1/v4.1/Canada, COSMIC, and all 3 retrieved publications - it is effectively novel/unreported.

PM3: 0 points - no A-T proband observations of this variant (confirmed in trans, phase unknown, second variant unidentified/VUS, or homozygous) exist in any queried source -> below the 1.0-point Supporting threshold -> not_met.

BP2: 0 points - no unaffected (non-A-T, >=18 years) individuals carrying the variant with a VCEP-classified P/LP ATM variant in trans, and no homozygous carriers -> not_met.

No phase information, parental testing, or co-occurring second variant data exist in the case bundle; any future A-T proband report with confirmed trans phase would score 2.0-4.0 points under the VCEP table and change this adjudication.

PP3 not met: SpliceAI max delta score 0.00 is well below the VCEP PP3 splicing threshold (>= 0.2); the missense REVEL sub-path is not applicable to a frameshift duplication (REVEL/BayesDel skipped for non-SNV; HCI prior/aGVGD not supported for ATM). The VCEP additionally bars PP3 splice predictions in addition to PVS1, which this null frameshift variant is expected to receive.

BP4 not met (lab override changes outcome vs VCEP literal text): SpliceAI 0.00 numerically satisfies the VCEP BP4 splicing sub-path threshold (<= 0.1), but the lab's BP4 one-mechanism override restricts the splicing sub-path to variants whose primary plausible mechanism is splicing (synonymous, intronic); a frameshift duplication with p.Lys92GlufsTer8 has protein truncation as its primary mechanism, so a clean SpliceAI score does not clear the variant's protein-level effect and BP4 is not applied.

BP7 not applicable: variant is a coding frameshift duplication, outside BP7's defined scope (synonymous and deep intronic variants); no RNA functional data present for BP7_RNA.

No VCEP supporting spreadsheet pre-assigns any code for this group: Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951 (Sun et al. 2025) covers ATM SNVs only (29,375 rows verified) and contains no c.273dup row.

The three retrieved full-text papers (PMID:27413114, PMID:30348496, PMID:30553448) are ATM biology/functional-theme reviews retrieved via OncoKB; none mention c.273dup, p.Lys92, or splicing predictions for this variant, so none support or were used to support PP3/BP4/BP7.

Framework: ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 (CSPEC doc 639508985, precedence rank 1) governs all four population criteria; generic ACMG/AMP was not used because an applicable gene-specific specification exists.

Population data: NM_000051.4:c.273dup (chr11-108229264-A-AG, GRCh38; NC_000011.9:g.108099992dup, GRCh37) is absent from gnomAD v4.1 exome, gnomAD v2.1 exome, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 genomes (all search_status=absent, AF=0). No ancestry-specific allele counts, homozygotes, or filtering-allele frequencies are reported for this variant.

BA1 not met (grpmax AF 0% << 0.5% threshold) and BS1 not met (0% << 0.05% threshold): both benign frequency criteria fail on the absence of the variant in gnomAD v4.

BS2 not applicable: the VCEP explicitly disallows BS2 for ATM because of incomplete penetrance, so no population-based healthy-adult/homozygote observation can be scored under this framework.

PM2 met at supporting strength only: absence from gnomAD v4 satisfies the <=0.001% frequency rule, and the VCEP mandates PM2_Supporting (not moderate). PM2 is the only population criterion contributing evidence in this group, and it is directional toward pathogenicity.

Ancestry/homozygote/prevalence/penetrance review: no population subpopulation carries the variant, so no ancestry-specific frequency artifacts apply; ATM incomplete penetrance is the reason BS2 is not applicable rather than evaluated; A-T disease prevalence considerations are already embedded in the VCEP PM2 threshold and do not alter the call.

Met · 3

PVS1 Very strongPVS1 (Very Strong): This one-base duplication in exon 4 of ATM shifts the reading frame (p.Lys92GlufsTer8) and creates a premature stop codon at residue 99 of the 3,056-residue protein, which is predicted to trigger nonsense-mediated decay. Loss-of-function is an established disease mechanism for ATM, and the variant is absent from population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000051.4:c.273dup is a 1-bp duplication in exon 4 of ATM (default VCEP transcript NM_000051.3/ENST00000278616.8; MANE Select NM_000051.4; all exons constitutive per ATM VCEP v1.5). It produces a frameshift, p.(Lys92GlufsTer8), with a premature termination codon at protein position 99 of the 3,056-residue wild-type protein (Mutalyzer predicted mutant protein ends at residue 99). This is a null-variant class (frameshift) explicitly covered by the ATM VCEP v1.5 PVS1 decision guide (adapted from PMID 30192042), and germline LoF is an established disease mechanism (VCEP PVS1 applicable; pvs1_gene_gate 'eligible'). NMD is predicted: the PTC at codon 99 is far upstream of the most C-terminal pathogenic residue p.Arg3047 (VCEP v1.5) and of the terminal exon-exon junction, with ~59 downstream exon-exon junctions; it is not in the last exon and not near the extreme 3' end. No PVS1 caveat applies: not a 3'-end variant; not a splice/exon-skipping variant (SpliceAI max delta 0.00; not at canonical +/-1,2 positions); no alternate-isoform rescue concern for constitutive exon 4; variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, consistent with LoF intolerance. Full-strength PVS1 (Very Strong) is therefore assigned. Note: the pipeline scaffold (pvs1_variant_assessment.json) defaults to the generic SVI PVS1 framework; the governing spec is the ATM VCEP v1.5 PVS1 decision tree, and both reach the identical conclusion.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5: 'Use ATM PVS1 Decision Tree' (adapted from PMID 30192042); NMD-predicted frameshift null variant upstream of p.Arg3047 in a constitutive exon -> PVS1 (Very Strong)
Evidence considered
  • cspec
  • vcep_atm_pvs1_1_5
  • pvs1_gene_context
  • pvs1_variant_assessment
  • pvs1_generic_framework
  • spliceai
  • gnomad_v2
  • gnomad_v4
  • gnomad_canada
Sources
PM2 SupportingPM2 (Supporting): the variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1 exomes, and from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, placing it well below the expert panel's 0.001% frequency threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 PM2 rule: frequency <=0.001% in the gnomAD v4 dataset, applied as PM2_Supporting (not moderate); the VCEP states that even n=1 in a single subpopulation is sufficiently rare for PM2_supporting. The variant NM_000051.4:c.273dup is absent from gnomAD v4.1 exome (AF=0, n=0), which satisfies the <=0.001% threshold; absence is corroborated by gnomAD v2.1 (exome) and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (genomes). PM2 is therefore met at supporting strength, and per the VCEP instruction ('Use as PM2_Supporting (not moderate)') must not be upgraded to moderate. The VCEP's original-ACMG caveat that indel population data may be poorly called by NGS is noted but does not block the call because the threshold is frequency-based and the variant is absent across both exome and genome datasets.

Rule
Frequency <=0.001% in gnomAD v4 dataset; use as PM2_Supporting (not moderate); n=1 in a single subpopulation is sufficiently rare
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 (exome): variant absent (search_status=absent, AF=0, n=0)
  • gnomAD v2.1 (exome): variant absent
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (HostSeq genomes): variant absent
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 PM2 rule: Frequency <=0.001% in gnomAD v4 dataset; n=1 in a single subpopulation is sufficiently rare and PM2_supporting applies; use as PM2_Supporting (not moderate)
Sources
PM5 SupportingPM5 (Supporting): the frameshift produces a premature stop codon at residue 99, far upstream of the most C-terminal known pathogenic ATM residue (p.Arg3047), satisfying the expert panel's truncation-cutoff rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Under ATM VCEP v1.5, PM5 is applicable but is specified as a truncation-cutoff rule anchored to the most C-terminal known pathogenic residue p.Arg3047*, and the panel explicitly directs 'Use as PM5_Supporting (not moderate)'. The governing rule states PM5_Supporting applies to 'frameshifting or truncating variants with premature termination codons upstream of p.Arg3047' (and to splice variants with an NMD-prone PVS1_VS(RNA) event); the panel forbids use for start-loss and for missense variants. c.273dup is a frameshifting duplication producing p.Lys92GlufsTer8 with a premature termination codon at residue ~99 (position_last_predicted 99), well upstream of p.Arg3047, and is neither a start-loss nor a missense variant. PM5_Supporting is therefore met on a rule-based determination directly from the VCEP ruleset; pm5_candidates.json independently confirms the governing mode is 'truncation_cutoff_gene_specific' with zero classic same-residue missense comparators (classic same-residue PM5 search not eligible). Note: this is the VCEP-repurposed truncation PM5, not classic same-residue missense PM5, and it is distinct from (not double-counting) the PVS1 code assigned by the null-variant group; the VCEP framework explicitly places PM5_Supporting in the supporting bucket (e.g., Rule19 Condition2) combinable with PVS1 codes.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PM5: 'Apply to frameshifting or truncating variants with premature termination codons upstream of p.Arg3047. Apply to splice variants as with premature termination codons upstream of p.Arg3047 where PVS1_VS(RNA) is applied based on high quality observed splicing impact and must be NMD prone.' with instructionsToUse 'Use as PM5_Supporting (not moderate). Do not use for start-loss variants. Do not use for missense changes.'
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC PM5 instructionsToUse ('Use as PM5_Supporting (not moderate)')
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 PM5 rule (frameshifting/truncating variants with PTC upstream of p.Arg3047)
  • Mutalyzer protein consequence p.Lys92GlufsTer8, PTC at codon 99 (< Arg3047)
  • pm5_candidates.json (mode truncation_cutoff_gene_specific, 0 same-residue candidates)
Sources
cspec ↗pm5_candidates

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM3 PM3 is not met: no observations of this variant in individuals with ataxia-telangiectasia were identified in any source, so it accrues zero points on the expert panel's points-based scale, below the 1-point threshold for supporting evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Governing framework is the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 points-based PM3/BP2 table (vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5), which applies regardless of variant class; no generic ACMG fallback is needed. PM3 points accrue per unrelated A-T proband: phenotype 'confident' = 4.0 (confirmed in trans) / 2.0 (phase unknown) / 1.0 (second variant unidentified or VUS) / 2.0 (homozygous, max 2 individuals); 'consistent' phenotype = half those values; PM3 Supporting = 1.0 point, Moderate = 2.0, Strong = 4.0, Very Strong = 8.0. The co-occurring P/LP variant must itself be classified under VCEP specifications. For NM_000051.4:c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8, frameshift), zero A-T proband observations of the variant were identified in any searched source: (1) ClinVar search for ATM c.273dup returned no result (zero submissions - the variant is completely absent from ClinVar, so no A-T proband observation with any phase status exists there); (2) gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada all report the variant as absent (no alleles, no homozygotes); (3) COSMIC has no record; (4) none of the 3 retrieved full-text publications (PMID:27413114, PMID:30348496, PMID:30553448) mentions the variant. PM3 points total = 0.0, below the 1.0-point Supporting threshold, so PM3 is not met.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PM3/BP2 points table: PM3 Supporting = 1.0, Moderate = 2.0, Strong = 4.0, Very Strong = 8.0 points per unrelated A-T proband (phenotype confident: 4.0 confirmed-in-trans / 2.0 phase-unknown / 1.0 second variant unidentified or VUS / 2.0 homozygous [max 2 individuals]; consistent phenotype: half). Co-occurring P/LP variant must be classified under VCEP specifications. Observed A-T probands = 0 -> 0.0 points -> below the 1.0-point Supporting threshold -> PM3 not met.
Evidence considered
  • vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5
  • cspec
  • clinvar
Still missing
  • No A-T proband observation of ATM c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8) exists in ClinVar (0 submissions), gnomAD (v2.1/v4.1/Canada all absent), COSMIC, or the retrieved literature; the variant appears to be novel/unreported.
  • No ATM/A-T disease-specific variant database (e.g., LOVD) was queried in this case's evidence bundle; proband-level trans observations could in principle exist outside the queried sources.
  • No phase or parental testing data exist for any observation of this variant, so trans configuration cannot be confirmed for any current or future proband report.
Sources
PP3 PP3 is not met: this is a frameshift duplication rather than a missense or splice-altering variant, and its predicted splice impact (computational splice score 0.00) is far below the expert panel's 0.2 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Variant is NM_000051.4:c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8), a coding frameshift duplication in exon 4 - not a missense, silent, in-frame, or intronic variant. ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 PP3 has two sub-paths, neither is met: (1) Missense sub-path (REVEL > 0.7333) is not applicable - this is not a missense SNV; the pipeline REVEL and BayesDel lookups were skipped ('not snv or no coords') and the HCI prior/aGVGD resource does not support ATM (gene_not_supported). (2) Splicing sub-path (SpliceAI >= 0.2 for silent, missense/in-frame, and intronic variants outside donor/acceptor +/-1,2) is not met on the merits: SpliceAI max delta score = 0.00 (pangolin_SG 0.0, pangolin_SL -0.09), far below the 0.2 threshold, and a frameshift duplication is outside the variant classes the splicing sub-path enumerates. Additionally, the VCEP explicitly states PP3 for splice predictions may not be applied in addition to PVS1 or PVS1_Variable(RNA) codes; this frameshift null variant is expected to carry PVS1 (see pvs1_variant_assessment), which independently bars stacking PP3. No VCEP supporting spreadsheet pre-assigns PP3 for this variant: Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951 covers SNVs only (29,375 rows) and contains no c.273dup row.

Rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 PP3 (Pathogenic Supporting): Missense REVEL > 0.7333; Splicing: SpliceAI >= 0.2 for silent, missense/in-frame and intronic variants outside donor/acceptor +/-1,2. PP3 for splice predictions may not be applied in addition to PVS1 or PVS1_Variable(RNA).
Evidence considered
  • spliceai: SpliceAI max delta score 0.00 (< 0.2 PP3 splicing threshold)
  • cspec: ATM VCEP v1.5 PP3 rule (REVEL > 0.7333 missense; SpliceAI >= 0.2 splicing) and non-stacking note with PVS1
  • prefetch/evidence: REVEL and BayesDel skipped for non-SNV; HCI prior not supported for ATM
Still missing
  • No REVEL/BayesDel score exists for this variant because in silico missense predictors are not applicable to a non-SNV frameshift duplication; no alternative computational predictor for frameshift variants is part of the VCEP framework.
Sources
BA1 BA1 is not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, far below the 0.5% allele-frequency threshold used to flag benign population variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Governing framework is the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC (precedence rank 1), whose BA1 rule requires grpmax filtering allele frequency >0.5% in the gnomAD v4 dataset. The variant NM_000051.4:c.273dup (chr11-108229264-A-AG, GRCh38) is absent from gnomAD v4.1 exome (search_status=absent, AF=0), so the >0.5% threshold is not approached and BA1 is not met. Absence is corroborated by gnomAD v2.1 (exome) and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (genomes). No population-frequency evidence supports a stand-alone benign call.

Rule
Grpmax Filtering AF >0.5% in gnomAD v4 dataset
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 (exome): variant absent (search_status=absent, AF=0)
  • gnomAD v2.1 (exome): variant absent
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (HostSeq genomes): variant absent
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BA1 rule: Grpmax Filtering AF >0.5% in gnomAD v4 dataset
Sources
BS1 BS1 is not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, far below the 0.05% threshold, and it does not occur at a frequency greater than expected for ATM-related disease in any population dataset. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BS1 requires grpmax filtering allele frequency >0.05% in the gnomAD v4 dataset. The variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1 exome (AF=0), which is far below the >0.05% threshold, so BS1 is not met. This is consistent with absence in gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada v1.0; the variant does not occur at a frequency greater than expected for ATM-related disease in any queried population dataset.

Rule
Grpmax Filtering AF >0.05% in gnomAD v4 dataset
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 (exome): variant absent (search_status=absent, AF=0)
  • gnomAD v2.1 (exome): variant absent
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (HostSeq genomes): variant absent
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BS1 rule: Grpmax Filtering AF >0.05% in gnomAD v4 dataset
Sources
BP2 BP2 is not met: no unaffected carriers of this variant were identified in any source, so it accrues zero points, which does not meet the -1-point threshold for supporting benign evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Under the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 points-based PM3/BP2 table (vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5), BP2 is applied to unaffected (non-A-T) individuals carrying the variant with a pathogenic/likely-pathogenic ATM variant in trans (or homozygous), where the individual is >=18 years old with no evidence of A-T (cspec instructionsToUse). Points: -4.0 (confirmed in trans), -2.0 (phase unknown), -2.0 lab / -1.0 database (homozygous, max -2.0); BP2 Supporting = -1.0 point, Moderate = -2.0, Strong <= -4.0. No such observations exist for c.273dup: the variant is absent from ClinVar (zero submissions, so no unaffected-carrier co-occurrence with a VCEP-classified P/LP ATM variant in trans is reported anywhere), gnomAD v2.1/v4.1/Canada show the variant as absent (no homozygous carriers, no carriers at all), COSMIC has no record, and none of the 3 retrieved full-text publications reports this variant in any individual. No evidence of the variant in cis with a pathogenic variant (generic ACMG BP2 axis) exists either. BP2 points total = 0.0 (no qualifying observations), so BP2 is not met.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PM3/BP2 points table: BP2 Supporting = -1.0, Moderate = -2.0, Strong <= -4.0 points per unaffected non-A-T individual (>=18 years, no evidence of A-T) carrying the variant with a P/LP variant in trans (confirmed trans -4.0; phase unknown -2.0; homozygous -2.0 lab / -1.0 database, max -2.0). Qualifying unaffected individuals = 0 -> 0.0 points -> above (i.e., less negative than) the -1.0 Supporting threshold -> BP2 not met.
Evidence considered
  • vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5
  • cspec
  • clinvar
Still missing
  • No unaffected-carrier co-occurrence data (variant plus a VCEP-classified P/LP ATM variant in trans, age >=18 without A-T) are available for this variant; it is absent from ClinVar with zero submissions.
  • No homozygous carriers observed in any population database queried (gnomAD v2.1/v4.1/Canada all absent), so the homozygous BP2 pathway cannot be assessed.
  • No ATM/A-T disease-specific variant database (e.g., LOVD) was queried in this case's evidence bundle.
Sources
BP4 BP4 is not met: a clean computational splice prediction (score 0.00) only rules out a splice effect; the variant's primary mechanism is protein truncation through the frameshift, and the expert panel's rules do not allow the splice result to offset that protein-level effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

OVERRIDE CHANGES THE OUTCOME FROM THE VCEP'S LITERAL TEXT: Under the ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP4 literal rule, the splicing sub-path (SpliceAI <= 0.1) is numerically satisfied (max delta score = 0.00) and the VCEP's BP4 instructions state splice analysis should be considered for all variant types including frameshift. However, the lab's BP4 one-mechanism override (vcep_materials.json gene_notes) requires evaluating exactly one applicable mechanism per variant: the missense sub-path (REVEL <= 0.249) applies to missense variants only and is not applicable here (non-SNV, REVEL unavailable/skipped); the splicing sub-path is reserved for non-missense variants for which splicing is the primary plausible mechanism (synonymous, intronic outside canonical +/-1,2). A frameshift duplication producing p.Lys92GlufsTer8 has protein truncation as its primary mechanism - a clean SpliceAI score (0.00) only rules out splice impact and does not clear the variant's own frameshift protein-level effect, exactly the double-counting the override forbids. BP4 therefore is not_met. No VCEP supporting spreadsheet pre-assigns BP4: Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951 (SNV-only, 29,375 rows) has no c.273dup row, and its computational predictors are secondary corroboration only.

Rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP4 (Benign Supporting): Missense REVEL <= 0.249; Splicing: SpliceAI <= 0.1 - as modified by the lab BP4 one-mechanism override (splice sub-path not applicable when splicing is not the variant's primary plausible mechanism, e.g. missense and frameshift variants).
Evidence considered
  • spliceai: SpliceAI max delta score 0.00 (<= 0.1 BP4 splicing threshold, satisfied numerically but overridden)
  • cspec: ATM VCEP v1.5 BP4 rule (REVEL <= 0.249 missense; SpliceAI <= 0.1 splicing)
  • vcep_materials gene_notes: lab BP4 one-mechanism override restricting splicing sub-path to variants where splicing is the primary plausible mechanism
Still missing
  • None evident for this variant class; note that if the lab ever chose to apply the VCEP's literal all-variant-type splice sub-path, BP4 would be met at supporting - this is a policy decision captured in the override, not an evidence gap.
Sources

Not assessed · 4 · no assessment recorded

PS3 PS3 was not assessed: insufficient evidence was available. The expert panel accepts functional evidence only from its specified ATM functional assays, and none of them reports this variant; although a damaging effect is mechanistically expected for a frameshift, the criterion requires variant-specific validated assay data. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No variant-specific functional assay evidence exists in the case bundle for NM_000051.4:c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8). The governing ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 framework (CSPEC, precedence rank 1) defines PS3 as: never use as Strong; PS3_Moderate when a variant fails to rescue BOTH an ATM-specific feature (e.g., phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets) AND radiosensitivity; PS3_Supporting when it fails to rescue an ATM-specific feature only (radiosensitivity-only is explicitly excluded). PS3 may only be applied from VCEP-approved assays - Mitui 2009 (PMID 18634022), Barone 2009 (PMID 19431188), Scott 2002 (PMID 11805335), all stable transfection of ATM cDNA into ATM-null LCLs with IR-induced substrate phosphorylation (S1981, SMC1, NBS1, CHK2, p53) and/or radiosensitivity readouts - and the calibration table (clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx) explicitly states it is NOT a per-variant results table: the variant under assessment must be confirmed to actually appear in one of the three papers. None of those three papers are present in this case's publication set, and no report of c.273dup in any of them was found. The Sun et al. 2025 saturation screen (PMID 40580951, Suppl Table S1) was checked directly: it covers only SNVs (single-nucleotide Ref/Alt, ~29,374 rows) and c.273dup is a duplication, so no row exists for this variant and no DeepATM/Combined_score readout applies. OncoKB's 'Likely Loss-of-function' annotation is a curated variant-class label in a somatic-cancer context, not well-established functional assay evidence, and the three OncoKB-sourced papers (PMID 27413114, 30348496, 30553448) do not mention this variant in their full texts. PS3 is therefore not_assessed rather than met: a damaging functional effect is mechanistically expected for a frameshift, but the criterion requires variant-specific validated assay data that is absent here.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PS3: Do not use as strong. PS3_Moderate = variant fails to rescue both an ATM-specific feature (e.g., phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets) AND radiosensitivity. PS3_Supporting = variant fails to rescue an ATM-specific feature only; do not use for radiosensitivity-only (not specific to ATM deficiency). Applicable only from VCEP-approved assays (Mitui 2009/PMID 18634022, Barone 2009/PMID 19431188, Scott 2002/PMID 11805335) with the variant confirmed tested in the paper.
Evidence considered
  • cspec (PS3 strength rules: no strong; Moderate = fails to rescue both ATM-specific feature and radiosensitivity; Supporting = fails to rescue ATM-specific feature only)
  • vcep_clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1 (approved assay calibration; no per-variant result for c.273dup; three approved papers not in bundle)
  • vcep_suppl_tables1_pmid_40580951 (SNV-only table verified; c.273dup absent)
  • oncokb (Likely Loss-of-function annotation - curated label, not validated functional assay evidence; rejected for PS3)
  • PMID:27413114, PMID:30348496, PMID:30553448 (full-text checked; variant not mentioned; rejected for PS3)
Still missing
  • No evidence that c.273dup was tested in any VCEP-approved ATM functional assay (Mitui 2009/PMID 18634022, Barone 2009/PMID 19431188, Scott 2002/PMID 11805335); the calibration table does not report per-variant results and these papers are not in the case bundle.
  • Sun et al. 2025 (PMID 40580951) Suppl Table S1 is SNV-only; c.273dup is a duplication and has no row, so no functional readout (DeepATM_predicted/Combined_score/Classification) exists for this variant.
  • The three OncoKB-sourced publications (PMID 27413114, 30348496, 30553448) contain general ATM biology only and never mention c.273dup/p.Lys92GlufsTer8; they cannot ground PS3.
  • If functional data is desired, obtain a variant-specific assay result (e.g., from the three approved papers or a VCEP-recognized equivalent) before assigning PS3 at any strength.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1vcep_suppl_tables1_pmid_40580951oncokb ↗PMID:27413114 ↗PMID:30348496 ↗PMID:30553448 ↗
PS4 PS4 was not assessed: no case-control or cohort study reporting this exact variant was identified. The variant is absent from ClinVar, population databases, and COSMIC, and is not described in the relevant literature. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 (CSPEC doc 639508985) makes PS4 applicable only for case-control studies meeting: p-value <= 0.05 AND (OR, HR, or RR >= 2 OR lower 95% CI >= 1.5). No case-control or large cohort association study reporting the exact variant c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8) exists in the evidence bundle. ClinVar has no record for this variant (variation_ids: [], submissions: []), gnomAD v2.1/v4.1/gnomAD-Canada report it as absent, and COSMIC has no somatic entry. The three retrieved full-text papers (PMID:27413114, PMID:30348496, PMID:30553448), sourced via OncoKB and triaged as candidate PS4/PP5/PP3 sources, are functional/review papers; full-text search confirms none mentions c.273dup or p.Lys92GlufsTer8, and none contains case-control or case-observation data for this variant. PS4 therefore cannot be met or refuted on available evidence and is left not_assessed (evidence gap, not a demonstrated lack of association).

Rule
Case-control studies; p-value <= 0.05 AND (Odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk >= 2 OR lower 95% CI >= 1.5). (ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5, default strength Pathogenic Strong)
Evidence considered
  • clinvar
  • cspec
  • PMID:27413114
  • PMID:30348496
  • PMID:30553448
  • gnomad_v2
  • gnomad_v4
  • gnomad_canada
  • cosmic
Still missing
  • No variant-specific case-control or cohort association study (OR/HR/RR with p<=0.05 per VCEP PS4 rule) reporting c.273dup; such a study is required before PS4 can be applied.
Sources
PP1 PP1 was not assessed: no segregation data for this variant is available. No affected relatives or family studies were reported, and the variant is absent from ClinVar and the published literature. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP v1.5 defines PP1 for autosomal-recessive A-T (segregation in 1 affected relative = Supporting, 2 = Moderate, >=3 = Strong), but no segregation evidence for NM_000051.4:c.273dup is available in this case: there is no proband phenotype, no affected relatives tested, no family/pedigree data, the variant is absent from ClinVar, and none of the retrieved publications report segregation for this variant. PP1 cannot be applied without variant-specific segregation data.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC PP1 (AR condition): Segregation in 1 affected relative = PP1 (Supporting); 2 affected relatives = PP1_Moderate; >=3 affected relatives = PP1_Strong.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC PP1 AR-condition rule: segregation in 1/2/>=3 affected relatives = Supporting/Moderate/Strong.
  • No segregation data present in the case bundle; variant absent from ClinVar; 3 retrieved publications are functional-theme papers with no variant or family data.
Still missing
  • No family segregation studies or affected-relative testing reported for c.273dup.
  • No proband phenotype or inheritance context (A-T vs cancer phenotype) documented in the case.
  • Variant absent from ClinVar; no literature case reports describing co-segregation.
Sources
BS3 BS3 was not assessed: insufficient evidence was available. No functional studies showing that this variant preserves ATM function were identified; the panel accepts only its specified functional assays, and none reports this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No variant-specific functional assay evidence exists in the case bundle for NM_000051.4:c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8). The governing ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 framework (CSPEC, precedence rank 1) defines BS3 as: BS3_Moderate when a variant rescues BOTH an ATM-specific feature (e.g., phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets) AND radiosensitivity; BS3_Supporting when it rescues EITHER an ATM-specific feature OR radiosensitivity. BS3 requires well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect, from the same VCEP-approved assay set as PS3 (Mitui 2009/PMID 18634022, Barone 2009/PMID 19431188, Scott 2002/PMID 11805335). The approved-assay calibration table (clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx) is explicitly not a per-variant results table - the variant must be confirmed to appear in one of the cited papers, and none of those papers are in this case's bundle with any report of c.273dup. The Sun et al. 2025 screen (PMID 40580951, Suppl Table S1) was checked directly and is SNV-only; c.273dup (a duplication) has no row, so no 'Functional' classification or DeepATM readout can be applied. OncoKB's curated 'Likely Loss-of-function' label is not functional assay evidence and the three OncoKB-sourced papers do not mention this variant. BS3 is therefore not_assessed: there is no assay evidence that this frameshift variant preserves ATM function, and no benign functional readout is available.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 BS3: BS3_Moderate = variant rescues both an ATM-specific feature (e.g., phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets) AND radiosensitivity. BS3_Supporting = variant rescues EITHER an ATM-specific feature OR radiosensitivity. Requires well-established functional studies from VCEP-approved assays (Mitui 2009/PMID 18634022, Barone 2009/PMID 19431188, Scott 2002/PMID 11805335) with the variant confirmed tested in the paper.
Evidence considered
  • cspec (BS3 strength rules: Moderate = rescues both ATM-specific feature and radiosensitivity; Supporting = rescues either)
  • vcep_clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1 (approved assay calibration; no per-variant result for c.273dup)
  • vcep_suppl_tables1_pmid_40580951 (SNV-only table verified; c.273dup absent)
  • oncokb (Likely Loss-of-function annotation - no benign functional evidence; rejected for BS3)
  • PMID:27413114, PMID:30348496, PMID:30553448 (full-text checked; variant not mentioned; rejected for BS3)
Still missing
  • No VCEP-approved assay result demonstrating rescue of an ATM-specific feature and/or radiosensitivity for c.273dup (papers Mitui 2009/PMID 18634022, Barone 2009/PMID 19431188, Scott 2002/PMID 11805335 not in bundle; no per-variant result in the calibration table).
  • Sun et al. 2025 (PMID 40580951) Suppl Table S1 does not cover duplications; c.273dup is absent, so no benign functional classification can be drawn from it.
  • The OncoKB-sourced publications (PMID 27413114, 30348496, 30553448) do not mention the variant and cannot ground BS3.
  • If benign functional evidence is sought, a variant-specific assay showing rescue of ATM-specific targets and/or radiosensitivity would be required before BS3 (Supporting or Moderate) could be applied.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1vcep_suppl_tables1_pmid_40580951oncokb ↗PMID:27413114 ↗PMID:30348496 ↗PMID:30553448 ↗
Not applicable · 15· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/APS1 does not apply: the ATM expert panel limits this criterion to missense changes producing the same amino-acid substitution as an established pathogenic variant, or to splice-region variants. This is a frameshift duplication with neither a comparable missense change nor a splice effect (no splice impact predicted). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM VCEP v1.5 restricts PS1 to two sub-paths: (1) missense changes where the variant under assessment produces the same amino-acid change as an established P/LP variant (with splicing ruled out for both alterations), and (2) splice-region variants adjudicated via the ATM PS1 Splicing table against a reference P/LP variant at the same position with a precisely matching predicted splice event. c.273dup is an exonic frameshift duplication (p.Lys92GlufsTer8) in exon 4: it produces no single amino-acid substitution for which a 'same amino acid change' comparator could exist, and it is not a splice-region variant (SpliceAI max delta 0.00; no predicted splice event; no reference splice variant at this position). Neither PS1 sub-path is structurally applicable. ClinVar has no entry for this variant and pm5_candidates.json reports zero same-residue comparators, so no alternate-path PS1 evidence exists either.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PS1: 'Use as ascribed for missense changes as long as a splice defect is ruled out for both variants; Use ATM PS1 Splicing table for splicing variants with similar predictions or observations of splice defect.'
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC PS1 instructionsToUse (missense + splicing-table scope)
  • ATM_PS1_1.5.pdf index guidance (missense and splice-region variants only)
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.00
  • ClinVar absence
  • pm5_candidates.json (0 same-residue candidates)
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_ps1_1_5pm5_candidates
PS2 VCEPPS2 does not apply: the ATM expert panel specifications declare this criterion not applicable, and no confirmed de novo occurrence of this variant has been reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS2 is declared Not Applicable by the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 specification (cspec.genome.network doc 639508985), which governs this ATM case; independent of the specification, no de novo occurrence of NM_000051.4:c.273dup in a proband with confirmed parental testing is reported anywhere in this case (variant is absent from ClinVar and no de novo report was retrieved).

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC: PS2 applicability = Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC lists PS2 applicability as Not Applicable.
  • ClinVar search for ATM c.273dup returned no result (no de novo submission exists).
Still missing
  • No proband de novo occurrence reported for this variant; variant absent from ClinVar with zero submissions.
  • No parental testing (maternity/paternity confirmed or unconfirmed) data available for this case.
Sources
PM1 VCEPPM1 does not apply: the ATM expert panel states that benign and pathogenic variants occur in the same domains and that germline mutational hotspots are not well defined for ATM, so the criterion is not used. It also targets missense variants, whereas this is a frameshift null variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM VCEP v1.5 marks PM1 'Not applicable' with the explicit instruction 'Do not use: Benign and pathogenic variants are known to occur within the same domains and germline mutational hotspots are not well defined at this time.' The VCEP does not recognize a mutational hotspot/critical-domain framework for PM1; functional-domain considerations (FATKIN/HEAT repeat) are instead handled inside the PVS1 decision tree, which is outside this group's criteria. Independently, PM1 targets missense variants in hotspots/domains, and c.273dup is a frameshift null variant, so the criterion would not apply even under generic ACMG.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PM1: 'Do not use: Benign and pathogenic variants are known to occur within the same domains and germline mutational hotspots are not well defined at this time.'
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC PM1 applicability = Not applicable with instructionsToUse
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 does not apply: the ATM expert panel restricts this criterion to stop-loss variants only. This is a frameshift duplication, whose protein-truncating effect is already captured by PVS1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP v1.5 restricts PM4 to stop-loss variants only: 'Do not use for in-frame insertions or deletions less than a single exon; Use for stop-loss variants, only.' c.273dup is an out-of-frame 1-bp duplication (frameshift, p.Lys92GlufsTer8), not a stop-loss variant and not an in-frame indel. Protein length change caused by this variant is the consequence of a frameshift/PTC, which is captured by PVS1, not PM4. Therefore PM4 is not applicable under the VCEP specification.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PM4: 'Do not use for in-frame insertions or deletions less than a single exon; Use for stop-loss variants, only.'
Evidence considered
  • cspec
Sources
PM6 VCEPPM6 does not apply: the ATM expert panel specifications declare this criterion not applicable, and no presumed de novo occurrence of this variant has been reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM6 is declared Not Applicable by the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 specification (cspec.genome.network doc 639508985); additionally, no presumed de novo occurrence (parental relationship not confirmed) of NM_000051.4:c.273dup has been reported — the variant is absent from ClinVar and no such report appears in the retrieved literature.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC: PM6 applicability = Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC lists PM6 applicability as Not Applicable.
  • ClinVar search for ATM c.273dup returned no result; none of the 3 retrieved publications mention the variant.
Still missing
  • No presumed de novo report for this variant exists in ClinVar or in the retrieved publications.
  • No proband phenotype or family testing information is available in this case.
Sources
PP2 VCEPPP2 does not apply: the ATM expert panel notes that ATM does not have a low rate of missense benign variation, so the criterion is not used; it also targets missense variants rather than frameshift null variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM VCEP v1.5 marks PP2 'Not applicable' with the explicit instruction 'Do not use: ATM does not have a defined low rate of missense benign variation.' The VCEP therefore does not support the missense-mechanism/low-benign-missense premise of PP2 for ATM. Independently, PP2 is defined for missense variants, and c.273dup is a frameshift null variant, so the criterion would not apply even under generic ACMG.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 PP2: 'Do not use: ATM does not have a defined low rate of missense benign variation.'
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC PP2 applicability = Not applicable with instructionsToUse
Sources
PP4 VCEPPP4 does not apply: the ATM expert panel specifications declare it not applicable, because phenotype specificity for ataxia-telangiectasia is already built into the PM3/BP2 points system. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 specification (CSPEC doc 639508985) explicitly declares PP4 'Not Applicable' for ATM: for the autosomal recessive A-T disease context the VCEP states phenotype specificity evidence is built into the Ataxia Telangiectasia PM3/BP2 points table and must not be used as a separate line of evidence, and for the autosomal dominant cancer context breast cancer has multiple genetic etiologies with no distinguishing features. Independently, no source in the bundle reports the exact variant c.273dup in a phenotype-specific context (no proband phenotype or case data is present in the bundle at all).

VCEP rule
Not Applicable per ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 (CSPEC doc 639508985); phenotype evidence is built into the A-T PM3/BP2 points table
Evidence considered
  • cspec
Sources
PP5 VCEPPP5 does not apply: the ATM expert panel declares it not applicable, and the variant has no ClinVar record at all, so no expert-panel classification exists that could invoke it. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Two independent bars are unmet. (1) The governing ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 declares PP5 'Not Applicable'. (2) Per the global PP5 rule, PP5 may only be triggered by an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic; this variant is entirely absent from ClinVar (no record, no submissions of any kind, zero expert-panel classifications), so the exact-variant expert-panel trigger does not exist and even the global ClinVar-3-star override has nothing to apply to. Ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate ClinVar labels, and non-expert assertions must never trigger PP5.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable per ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5. Global rule: apply only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic classification (supporting strength)
Evidence considered
  • clinvar
  • cspec
Sources
BS2 VCEPBS2 does not apply: the ATM expert panel notes that ATM has incomplete penetrance, so observations of the variant in unaffected individuals carry no benign weight under this specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 marks BS2 as Not Applicable with instructions 'Do not use: ATM has incomplete penetrance.' BS2 (observed in a healthy adult for a recessive/dominant/X-linked disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age) cannot be applied to ATM because ATM-related phenotypes have incomplete penetrance, so observations of the variant in unaffected individuals (including any homozygotes in population databases) carry no benign weight under this specification. No homozygotes are present in the queried gnomAD datasets in any case (variant absent), but the criterion is formally not applicable rather than evaluated on frequency grounds.

VCEP rule
Not applicable per ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 (ATM has incomplete penetrance)
Evidence considered
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BS2 instructions: 'Do not use: ATM has incomplete penetrance.'
Sources
BS4 VCEPBS4 does not apply: the ATM expert panel specifications declare it not applicable, and no data on absence of the variant in affected family members is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS4 is declared Not Applicable by the ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 specification (cspec.genome.network doc 639508985), which governs this ATM case; in any event, no data on absence of the variant in affected family members (non-segregation) is available for NM_000051.4:c.273dup.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC: BS4 applicability = Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC lists BS4 applicability as Not Applicable.
  • No family data exists in this case bundle to support or refute non-segregation.
Still missing
  • No affected-family-member testing data available to evaluate non-segregation even if the criterion were applicable.
Sources
BP1 VCEPBP1 does not apply: the ATM expert panel notes that missense pathogenic variants are known in ATM, so the criterion is not used; it also targets missense variants rather than frameshift null variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM VCEP v1.5 marks BP1 'Not applicable' with the explicit instruction 'Do not use: Missense pathogenic variants are known for ATM.' The VCEP rejects the premise that only truncating variants cause ATM disease, so BP1 (missense in a gene where primarily truncating variants cause disease) is disallowed. Independently, BP1 is defined for missense variants, and c.273dup is a frameshift null variant rather than a missense change, so the criterion would not apply even under generic ACMG.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 BP1: 'Do not use: Missense pathogenic variants are known for ATM.'
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.5 CSPEC BP1 applicability = Not applicable with instructionsToUse
Sources
BP3 VCEPBP3 does not apply: the ATM expert panel instructs that this criterion not be used, and c.273dup is an out-of-frame frameshift duplication rather than an in-frame indel in a repetitive region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP v1.5 declares BP3 'Not applicable - Do not use' (original ACMG summary: 'In frame-deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function'). c.273dup is an out-of-frame frameshift duplication in exon 4, not an in-frame indel, and there is no evidence it falls in a repetitive region without known function. Generic ACMG BP3 is superseded by the VCEP instruction and is not applied.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.5 BP3: 'Not applicable' / 'Do not use.'
Evidence considered
  • cspec
Sources
BP5 VCEPBP5 does not apply: the ATM expert panel specifications declare it not applicable, and no evidence of an alternate genetic cause in carriers of this variant exists. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 specification (CSPEC doc 639508985) explicitly declares BP5 'Not Applicable' for ATM. No variant-specific evidence of an alternate genetic cause in carriers of c.273dup exists in the bundle (the variant has no reported carriers in ClinVar or gnomAD), and the criterion is not part of the ATM framework.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable per ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 (CSPEC doc 639508985)
Evidence considered
  • cspec
Sources
BP6 VCEPBP6 does not apply: the ATM expert panel declares it not applicable, and the variant has no ClinVar record, so no expert-panel benign classification exists that could invoke it. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Two independent bars are unmet. (1) The governing ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 declares BP6 'Not Applicable'. (2) Per the global BP6 rule, BP6 may only be triggered by an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Benign/Likely Benign; this variant is entirely absent from ClinVar (no record, no submissions of any kind, zero expert-panel classifications), so the exact-variant expert-panel benign trigger does not exist and even the global ClinVar-3-star override has nothing to apply to. Ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate ClinVar labels, and non-expert assertions must never trigger BP6.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable per ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5. Global rule: apply only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign/Likely Benign classification (supporting strength)
Evidence considered
  • clinvar
  • cspec
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 does not apply: the criterion is defined for synonymous and deep intronic variants, whereas c.273dup is a coding frameshift duplication in exon 4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP7 is defined for synonymous variants and deep intronic variants further than (but not including) +7 at donor and further than (but not including) -21 at acceptor sites, with BP7(RNA) for observed lack of aberrant RNA defect in silent substitutions and intronic variants. NM_000051.4:c.273dup is a coding exonic frameshift duplication (exon 4, p.Lys92GlufsTer8) - neither synonymous nor deep intronic - so the criterion is not applicable to this variant class. No RNA functional studies are present in the case evidence bundle, so the BP7_RNA sub-path is not assessable either. BP7 is not considered a conflicting piece of evidence against a body of evidence supporting a pathogenic splice defect per VCEP instructions, and none of this group's in silico evidence supports a benign call for this frameshift variant.

Rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP7 (Benign Supporting): Use for synonymous and deep intronic variants defined as further than (but not including) +7 and further than (but not including) -21 at donor and acceptor sites, respectively; BP7(RNA) for observed lack of aberrant RNA defect in silent substitutions and intronic variants.
Evidence considered
  • cspec: ATM VCEP v1.5 BP7 rule text (synonymous and deep intronic scope; BP7(RNA) requires observed lack of aberrant RNA defect)
Still missing
  • No RNA-based splicing assay data (BP7_RNA) exists in this case; BP7_RNA would require observed lack of aberrant RNA for a silent/intronic variant, which does not apply here.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
ATM
Transcript
NM_000051.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000051.4:c.273dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000042.3:p.(Lys92GlufsTer8)
GRCh38
chr11:108229264 A>AG
GRCh37
chr11:108099991 A>AG

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in ATM, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000051.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

ATMNM_000051.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.090
Pangolin splice gain
0.000

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 PP3 is not met: this is a frameshift duplication rather than a missense or splice-altering variant, and its predicted splice impact (computational splice score 0.00) is far below the expert panel's 0.2 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Variant is NM_000051.4:c.273dup (p.Lys92GlufsTer8), a coding frameshift duplication in exon 4 - not a missense, silent, in-frame, or intronic variant. ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 PP3 has two sub-paths, neither is met: (1) Missense sub-path (REVEL > 0.7333) is not applicable - this is not a missense SNV; the pipeline REVEL and BayesDel lookups were skipped ('not snv or no coords') and the HCI prior/aGVGD resource does not support ATM (gene_not_supported). (2) Splicing sub-path (SpliceAI >= 0.2 for silent, missense/in-frame, and intronic variants outside donor/acceptor +/-1,2) is not met on the merits: SpliceAI max delta score = 0.00 (pangolin_SG 0.0, pangolin_SL -0.09), far below the 0.2 threshold, and a frameshift duplication is outside the variant classes the splicing sub-path enumerates. Additionally, the VCEP explicitly states PP3 for splice predictions may not be applied in addition to PVS1 or PVS1_Variable(RNA) codes; this frameshift null variant is expected to carry PVS1 (see pvs1_variant_assessment), which independently bars stacking PP3. No VCEP supporting spreadsheet pre-assigns PP3 for this variant: Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951 covers SNVs only (29,375 rows) and contains no c.273dup row.

Rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 PP3 (Pathogenic Supporting): Missense REVEL > 0.7333; Splicing: SpliceAI >= 0.2 for silent, missense/in-frame and intronic variants outside donor/acceptor +/-1,2. PP3 for splice predictions may not be applied in addition to PVS1 or PVS1_Variable(RNA).
Evidence considered
  • spliceai: SpliceAI max delta score 0.00 (< 0.2 PP3 splicing threshold)
  • cspec: ATM VCEP v1.5 PP3 rule (REVEL > 0.7333 missense; SpliceAI >= 0.2 splicing) and non-stacking note with PVS1
  • prefetch/evidence: REVEL and BayesDel skipped for non-SNV; HCI prior not supported for ATM
Still missing
  • No REVEL/BayesDel score exists for this variant because in silico missense predictors are not applicable to a non-SNV frameshift duplication; no alternative computational predictor for frameshift variants is part of the VCEP framework.
Sources
BP4 BP4 is not met: a clean computational splice prediction (score 0.00) only rules out a splice effect; the variant's primary mechanism is protein truncation through the frameshift, and the expert panel's rules do not allow the splice result to offset that protein-level effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

OVERRIDE CHANGES THE OUTCOME FROM THE VCEP'S LITERAL TEXT: Under the ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP4 literal rule, the splicing sub-path (SpliceAI <= 0.1) is numerically satisfied (max delta score = 0.00) and the VCEP's BP4 instructions state splice analysis should be considered for all variant types including frameshift. However, the lab's BP4 one-mechanism override (vcep_materials.json gene_notes) requires evaluating exactly one applicable mechanism per variant: the missense sub-path (REVEL <= 0.249) applies to missense variants only and is not applicable here (non-SNV, REVEL unavailable/skipped); the splicing sub-path is reserved for non-missense variants for which splicing is the primary plausible mechanism (synonymous, intronic outside canonical +/-1,2). A frameshift duplication producing p.Lys92GlufsTer8 has protein truncation as its primary mechanism - a clean SpliceAI score (0.00) only rules out splice impact and does not clear the variant's own frameshift protein-level effect, exactly the double-counting the override forbids. BP4 therefore is not_met. No VCEP supporting spreadsheet pre-assigns BP4: Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951 (SNV-only, 29,375 rows) has no c.273dup row, and its computational predictors are secondary corroboration only.

Rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP4 (Benign Supporting): Missense REVEL <= 0.249; Splicing: SpliceAI <= 0.1 - as modified by the lab BP4 one-mechanism override (splice sub-path not applicable when splicing is not the variant's primary plausible mechanism, e.g. missense and frameshift variants).
Evidence considered
  • spliceai: SpliceAI max delta score 0.00 (<= 0.1 BP4 splicing threshold, satisfied numerically but overridden)
  • cspec: ATM VCEP v1.5 BP4 rule (REVEL <= 0.249 missense; SpliceAI <= 0.1 splicing)
  • vcep_materials gene_notes: lab BP4 one-mechanism override restricting splicing sub-path to variants where splicing is the primary plausible mechanism
Still missing
  • None evident for this variant class; note that if the lab ever chose to apply the VCEP's literal all-variant-type splice sub-path, BP4 would be met at supporting - this is a policy decision captured in the override, not an evidence gap.
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 does not apply: the criterion is defined for synonymous and deep intronic variants, whereas c.273dup is a coding frameshift duplication in exon 4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP7 is defined for synonymous variants and deep intronic variants further than (but not including) +7 at donor and further than (but not including) -21 at acceptor sites, with BP7(RNA) for observed lack of aberrant RNA defect in silent substitutions and intronic variants. NM_000051.4:c.273dup is a coding exonic frameshift duplication (exon 4, p.Lys92GlufsTer8) - neither synonymous nor deep intronic - so the criterion is not applicable to this variant class. No RNA functional studies are present in the case evidence bundle, so the BP7_RNA sub-path is not assessable either. BP7 is not considered a conflicting piece of evidence against a body of evidence supporting a pathogenic splice defect per VCEP instructions, and none of this group's in silico evidence supports a benign call for this frameshift variant.

Rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.5 BP7 (Benign Supporting): Use for synonymous and deep intronic variants defined as further than (but not including) +7 and further than (but not including) -21 at donor and acceptor sites, respectively; BP7(RNA) for observed lack of aberrant RNA defect in silent substitutions and intronic variants.
Evidence considered
  • cspec: ATM VCEP v1.5 BP7 rule text (synonymous and deep intronic scope; BP7(RNA) requires observed lack of aberrant RNA defect)
Still missing
  • No RNA-based splicing assay data (BP7_RNA) exists in this case; BP7_RNA would require observed lack of aberrant RNA for a silent/intronic variant, which does not apply here.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

3 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • ATM Mutations in Cancer: Therapeutic Implications.
    Review article (Choi, Kipps & Kurzrock, Mol Cancer Ther 2016) on ATM mutations in cancer. Screened in full text for this variant group: it contains no mention of c.273dup, p.Lys92GlufsTer8, or residue K92, and offers only general gene-level discussion of ATM loss-of-function biology (checkpoint arrest, homologous DNA repair, cancer predisposition). Per citation-grounding policy, general gene-level discussion does not support any criterion for this specific variant, so it is not cited for PVS1/PM4/BP3.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 27413114 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Germ-line mutations of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene result in the well-characterized ataxia telangiectasia syndrome, which manifests with an increased cancer predisposition, including a 20% to 30% lifetime risk of lymphoid, gastric, breast, central nervous system, skin, and other cancers.

    Abstract, lines 8-18 of full-text file (publications/27413114.txt); variant terms absent from entire full text (grep: c.273dup, K92, Lys92, EfsTer8, GlufsTer8 -> 0 hits)

  • Inactive Atm abrogates DSB repair in mouse cerebellum more than does Atm loss, without causing a neurological phenotype.
    Mouse-model study (Inactive Atm abrogates DSB repair in mouse cerebellum more than does Atm loss, without causing a neurological phenotype) on ATM kinase activity versus ATM loss in DSB repair. Screened in full text: it does not mention c.273dup, p.Lys92GlufsTer8, or residue K92. Its general statement that most A-T mutations are null/truncating alleles (context for why frameshift nulls cause ATM deficiency) is gene-level background only and does not constitute variant-specific evidence; not cited for any criterion in this group.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 30348496 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Most A-T mutations are null alleles that truncate the ATM protein. Since truncated ATM is usually unstable, most A-T patients are typically devoid of ATM [11, 28].

    Introduction, first paragraph of full-text file (publications/30348496.txt); variant terms absent from entire full text (grep: c.273dup, K92, Lys92, EfsTer8, GlufsTer8 -> 0 hits)

  • Loss of ATM positively regulates Rac1 activity and cellular migration through oxidative stress.
    Cell-biology study (Tolbert et al.) on loss of ATM kinase activity elevating ROS and activating Rac1 to promote migration. Screened in full text: it does not mention c.273dup, p.Lys92GlufsTer8, or residue K92. Provides only general ATM biology (ATM as a serine-threonine kinase in the DSB response) and does not test this variant; not cited for any criterion in this group.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 30553448 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a serine-threonine kinase that is integral in the response to DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs).

    Abstract, line 18 of full-text file (publications/30553448.txt); variant terms absent from entire full text (grep: c.273dup, K92, Lys92, EfsTer8, GlufsTer8 -> 0 hits)

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.