0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

ATM c.3285-15C>T, p.?

NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T NP_000042.3:p.? Unknown · intron 22 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About ATM

ATM encodes a kinase that acts as a master controller of the cellular DNA damage response: it detects double-strand breaks and coordinates DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, or apoptosis through downstream targets including p53, BRCA1, and CHK2. Loss-of-function mutations in both copies of ATM cause ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by neurological problems, immune deficiency, and cancer predisposition. ATM functions as a tumor suppressor: individuals with ataxia telangiectasia are prone to childhood lymphomas, leukemias, and breast cancer, while carriers of a single altered copy have increased risk of breast, pancreatic, prostate, and other cancers. Somatic ATM mutations also occur in lymphoid malignancies and solid tumors, and ATM-deficient cancers are often especially sensitive to DNA-damaging treatments.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.6. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Met, supporting: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.01 meets the ATM VCEP BP4 threshold of <=0.1.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: BP4 (supporting) is the only met criterion, and no ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP Version 1.6 combination rule is satisfied.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
23 / 1,550,332 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 23 / 1,550,332 alleles. Recorded AF 1.48355e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.14794e-05; MAF= 0.00615%, 15/243984 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 0.000409475; MAF= 0.04095%, 13/31748 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00022392.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.010 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.010. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
6 reported laboratory submissions

3 Likely benign · 2 Benign · 1 Likely Benign. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
No screenshot for this evidence
Functional evidence
Not recorded

No standalone functional evidence summary is recorded in evidence_summary.functional.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Context only COSMIC ↗
For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.6, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 1 met · 5 not met · 7 not assessed · 15 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The ATM HBOP VCEP version 1.6 governs this case and takes precedence over generic ACMG/AMP criteria.

Only PS4 is applicable among the requested criteria; it remains not assessed because qualifying case-control phenotype-enrichment statistics are absent.

PP4, PP5, BP5, and BP6 are explicitly not applicable under the governing ATM VCEP, and the ClinVar audit independently shows no exact-variant expert-panel assertion that could activate PP5 or BP6.

Met · 1

BP4 SupportingMet, supporting: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.01 meets the ATM VCEP BP4 threshold of <=0.1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is evaluated on the SpliceAI path because NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is intronic/splice-region and has NP_000042.3:p.?. The maximum SpliceAI delta is 0.01, which meets the ATM VCEP Version 1.6 BP4 splicing threshold of <=0.1; BP4 Supporting is therefore met. The governing ATM Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx table was searched for c.3285-15C>T and p.?; no pre-assigned BP4 entry for this variant was found.

Rule
ATM VCEP Version 1.6 BP4 Splicing: no predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI <=0.1).
Evidence considered
  • The normalized variant is NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T with predicted protein consequence NP_000042.3:p.?; this is an intronic splice-region variant, so SpliceAI rather than REVEL is the applicable computational path.
  • SpliceAI reports a maximum delta score of 0.01.
  • The ATM VCEP Version 1.6 specification assigns BP4 Supporting for no predicted splicing impact at SpliceAI <=0.1; the observed maximum delta of 0.01 meets that threshold.
  • The generic SpliceAI supporting threshold is also <=0.1, from Jaganathan et al. 2019 (PMID:30661751).
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when searching Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; therefore no pre-assigned BP4 code was available from that governing table.
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PVS1 Not met: intronic c.3285-15C>T is outside canonical +/-1,2 splice sites and SpliceAI max delta is 0.01, below the 0.2 splice-impact threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is an intronic splice-region variant outside the canonical +/-1,2 positions and is annotated as NP_000042.3:p.?. The ATM VCEP PVS1 guide defines PVS1 for null variants including canonical +/-1,2 splice variants, but this variant is not in that null-variant category; SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta of 0.01, below the VCEP splice-impact threshold of 0.2 for PP3. No RNA evidence establishes an aberrant transcript or loss of function. The exact variant notation c.3285-15C>T and protein notation p.? were searched in ATM_PVS1_1.5.pdf, with no variant-specific entry found.

Rule
ATM_PVS1_1.5.pdf PVS1 null-variant definition and decision guide
Evidence considered
  • The ATM_PVS1_1.5.pdf guide defines PVS1 for null variants, including canonical +/-1,2 splice sites, and cautions that splice variants predicted to cause exon skipping require specific consideration.
  • The case is NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T with protein annotation NP_000042.3:p.?; the variant is intronic and not a canonical +/-1,2 splice-site change.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG 0.004, DS_AL 0.01, DS_DG 0.004, DS_DL 0.0, with maximum delta 0.01; the ATM VCEP splice-impact threshold is >=0.2 for PP3.
  • No RNA evidence establishing aberrant splicing or loss of function is available.
  • The exact notations c.3285-15C>T and p.? were searched in ATM_PVS1_1.5.pdf and no variant-specific entry was found.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3285-15C>T or p.? entry was found in ATM_PVS1_1.5.pdf.
  • No RNA study demonstrating aberrant splicing or transcript loss was available.
Sources
cspec ↗spliceai ↗pvs1_gene_context
PM2 Not met: the highest gnomAD subpopulation frequency is 0.0409475%, exceeding the ATM VCEP PM2 threshold of <=0.001%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP v1.6 specifies PM2 Supporting when the frequency is at most 0.001% in the gnomAD subpopulation with the highest frequency, with an exception for a single observation confined to one subpopulation. The highest all-comers subpopulation frequency is 0.0409475% (13/31,748 alleles) in gnomAD v2.1 Admixed American and 0.0334784% (2/5,974 alleles) in gnomAD v4.1 Middle Eastern, both above 0.001%; neither meets the single-observation exception. Therefore PM2 is not met.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.6: PM2 Supporting at frequency <=0.001% in the highest-frequency gnomAD subpopulation; exception only when n=1 in one subpopulation and absent from all others.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP version 1.6 defines PM2 Supporting as frequency <=0.001% in the gnomAD subpopulation with the highest frequency; a single observation confined to one subpopulation is an exception.
  • All-comers gnomAD v2.1 has the highest observed subpopulation AF of 0.0004094746 (0.0409475%), Admixed American, based on 13/31,748 alleles.
  • All-comers gnomAD v4.1 has the highest observed subpopulation AF of 0.000334784 (0.0334784%), Middle Eastern, based on 2/5,974 alleles; this is not a single-observation exception.
  • The non-cancer datasets do not provide a basis to apply PM2: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome AF is 0.00641589% and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer's highest subpopulation AF is 0.0507099%, both above 0.001%.
Sources
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.01 is below the ATM VCEP PP3 threshold of >=0.2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is evaluated on the SpliceAI path because NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is an intronic splice-region variant with NP_000042.3:p.? and no protein-length-changing consequence. The case SpliceAI result has a maximum delta score of 0.01, below the ATM VCEP Version 1.6 splicing PP3 threshold of >=0.2, so PP3 is not met. The governing ATM Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx table was searched for c.3285-15C>T and p.?; no pre-assigned PP3 or BP4 entry for this variant was found.

Rule
ATM VCEP Version 1.6 PP3 Splicing: predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI >=0.2) for silent, missense/in-frame, and intronic variants outside donor and acceptor 1,2 sites.
Evidence considered
  • The normalized variant is NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T with predicted protein consequence NP_000042.3:p.?; this is an intronic splice-region variant, so SpliceAI rather than REVEL is the applicable computational path.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG 0.004, DS_AL 0.01, DS_DG 0.004, and DS_DL 0.0; the maximum delta is 0.01.
  • The ATM VCEP Version 1.6 specification assigns PP3 Supporting for predicted splicing impact at SpliceAI >=0.2; the observed maximum delta of 0.01 does not meet that threshold.
  • The generic SpliceAI supporting threshold is also >=0.2, from Jaganathan et al. 2019 (PMID:30661751).
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when searching Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; therefore no pre-assigned PP3 code was available from that governing table.
Sources
BA1 Not met: gnomAD grpmax FAF is 0.022392% in v2.1, below the ATM VCEP BA1 threshold of >0.5%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP v1.6 specifies BA1 when the gnomAD grpmax filtering allele frequency is greater than 0.5%. The variant's all-comers gnomAD grpmax FAF is 0.00022392 (0.022392%) in v2.1 and 0.00017606 (0.017606%) in v4.1, both below the >0.5% threshold. The available non-cancer datasets also do not approach the threshold: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes have AF 0.0000641589, and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer has AF 0.0000206751. Therefore BA1 is not met.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.6: BA1 when grpmax filtering AF >0.5% in gnomAD.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP version 1.6 defines BA1 as grpmax filtering AF >0.5% in gnomAD.
  • All-comers gnomAD v2.1 reports grpmax FAF 0.00022392 (0.022392%), and gnomAD v4.1 reports grpmax FAF 0.00017606 (0.017606%), both below the VCEP threshold.
  • The non-cancer datasets are also far below the BA1 threshold: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes AF 0.0000641589 and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer AF 0.0000206751.
Sources
BS1 Not met: gnomAD v2.1 grpmax FAF is 0.022392%, below the ATM VCEP BS1 threshold of >0.05%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP v1.6 specifies BS1 when the gnomAD grpmax filtering allele frequency is greater than 0.05%. The all-comers grpmax FAF is 0.00022392 (0.022392%) in v2.1 and 0.00017606 (0.017606%) in v4.1, both below 0.05%. The non-cancer datasets likewise remain below this threshold, with v2.1 non-cancer exome AF 0.0000641589 and v3.1 non-cancer AF 0.0000206751. Therefore BS1 is not met.

Rule
ATM VCEP v1.6: BS1 when grpmax filtering AF >0.05% in gnomAD.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP version 1.6 defines BS1 as grpmax filtering AF >0.05% in gnomAD.
  • All-comers gnomAD v2.1 grpmax FAF is 0.00022392 (0.022392%) and v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.00017606 (0.017606%), both below the VCEP threshold.
  • The non-cancer datasets are below the BS1 threshold: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome AF 0.0000641589 and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer AF 0.0000206751.
Sources

Not assessed · 7 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: ATM PS1 requires a matched pathogenic splice reference, but no c.3285-15C>T or p.? entry was found and SpliceAI max delta is only 0.01. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP PS1 splicing pathway requires a known pathogenic or likely pathogenic reference variant with the same predicted splice event and a directly comparable position. Searches of ATM_PS1_1.5.pdf and ATM_PS1_1.6.pdf found no entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.?, and the case has no qualifying reference splice variant. SpliceAI max delta is 0.01, below the VCEP PP3 splice threshold of 0.2, so the required damaging baseline splice evidence is also unavailable. PS1 cannot be assigned, but the absence of a table entry is not evidence that the criterion is definitively not met.

Rule
Use the ATM PS1 Splicing table only when a qualifying pathogenic or likely pathogenic reference variant has the same predicted splice event and the VUA prediction is of similar or greater strength.
Evidence considered
  • ATM PS1 requires the VUA's predicted splice event to precisely match that of a known pathogenic or likely pathogenic reference variant, with prediction strength at least as strong.
  • The searched ATM PS1 v1.5 and v1.6 full-text files contain no entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.?.
  • The case variant is intronic with protein consequence p.? and SpliceAI max delta 0.01, below the ATM VCEP splice PP3 threshold of 0.2.
Still missing
  • No c.3285-15C>T or p.? entry was found in ATM_PS1_1.5.pdf.
  • No c.3285-15C>T or p.? entry was found in ATM_PS1_1.6.pdf.
  • No qualifying pathogenic or likely pathogenic reference variant with the same predicted splice event and comparable position was identified.
Sources
vcep_atm_ps1_1_5vcep_atm_ps1_1_6cspec ↗spliceai ↗
PS3 Not assessed: no variant-specific damaging assay result was found, and ATM VCEP PS3 requires an exact tested-variant result with calibrated ATM functional readouts. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP v1.6 specification permits PS3 only for variant-specific damaging functional evidence: supporting when an ATM-specific feature such as phosphorylation fails, and moderate only when both an ATM-specific feature and radiosensitivity fail; strong is not permitted. The governing approved-assay table is a methodology and calibration table, not a per-variant results table, and its three kinase-assay papers (PMID:18634022, PMID:19431188, and PMID:11805335) and approved radiosensitivity assay require confirmation that this exact variant was tested. The exact notations NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15C>T, and NP_000042.3:p.? were searched in the full text of clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx and Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; neither governing file contained an exact variant result. The case evidence bundle and paper extracts likewise contain no variant-specific functional assay result. Therefore PS3 cannot be assigned from the available evidence.

Rule
Do not use as strong. Use when a variant fails to rescue both an ATM specific feature (e.g. phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets) AND radiosensitivity. Use when a variant fails to rescue an ATM specific feature, only (e.g. phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets). Do not use for radiosensitivity-only as that is not a feature specific to ATM deficiency.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.6 PS3 rule: do not use PS3 as strong; use PS3_Moderate when both an ATM-specific feature and radiosensitivity fail, and PS3_Supporting when an ATM-specific feature alone fails; radiosensitivity alone receives no weight.
  • The approved assay table describes ATM kinase activity assays using stable ATM cDNA transfection into ATM-null lymphoblastoid cells with phosphorylation readouts and calibrates them at PS3_Supporting, but it explicitly does not report which variants were tested.
  • The approved assay table describes Mitui 2009 radiosensitivity calibration at PS3_Moderate only when combined with qualifying kinase-activity evidence; no exact current-variant result is present.
  • Searches of both governing VCEP full-text files for c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15, and p.? returned no exact variant entry or functional readout.
Still missing
  • No exact entry for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15C>T, or NP_000042.3:p.? was found in clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx; this file is a calibration/methodology table rather than a per-variant results table.
  • No exact entry for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15C>T, or NP_000042.3:p.? was found in Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx.
  • The primary approved assay papers (PMID:18634022, PMID:19431188, and PMID:11805335) were not available as variant-specific extracted case evidence, so exact testing and readouts for this variant could not be verified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1vcep_suppl_tables1_pmid_40580951
PS4 Not assessed: no variant-specific case-control p-value, enrichment estimate, or confidence interval is available for comparison with the VCEP PS4 thresholds. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM ClinGen HBOP VCEP version 1.6 makes PS4 applicable at Strong strength only for case-control studies with p-value ≤.05 and (odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk ≥2 or lower 95% confidence interval ≥1.5). No case-control counts, p-value, odds ratio, hazard ratio, relative risk, confidence interval, or validated variant-specific phenotype-enrichment study was identified for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T. The reviewed ClinVar-linked publications do not report this exact variant or ATM-specific case-control evidence, so PS4 cannot be adjudicated.

Rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6 PS4 Strong: case-control studies; p-value ≤.05 and (odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk ≥2 or lower 95% CI ≥1.5).
Evidence considered
  • The governing ATM VCEP v1.6 PS4 rule states: "Case-control studies; p-value ≤.05 and (Odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk ≥2 or lower 95% CI ≥1.5)."
  • The exact variant NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is not reported in the reviewed ClinVar-linked publications, and no case-control effect estimate or p-value for this variant was found.
  • No numeric PS4 comparison can be written because no qualifying p-value, effect estimate, or confidence interval is available.
Still missing
  • A variant-specific ATM case-control study or equivalent validated phenotype-enrichment dataset with p-value and effect estimate is unavailable.
Sources
PM3 Not assessed: no A-T proband, biallelic observation, pathogenic variant in trans, or phase evidence was reported; the VCEP table has no entry for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP PM3 framework assigns points only for unrelated A-T-affected probands carrying the variant with a sufficiently rare allele and evidence of homozygosity, a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in trans, or phase-unknown/second-variant observations. The case evidence contains no affected-proband observation, A-T phenotype, homozygous patient, co-occurring pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variant, parental phase result, or other inheritance evidence for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T (NP_000042.3:p.?). The governing file ATM_PM3_BP2_1.5.pdf was searched for c.3285-15C>T and p.? and contains no variant-specific entry; therefore no PM3 points or strength can be assigned. The variant is sufficiently rare for the VCEP prerequisite in gnomAD v4.1 (grpmax FAF 0.00017606), but rarity alone does not establish PM3.

Rule
ATM VCEP PM3: assign points from unrelated A-T probands; PM3 Supporting=1.0, Moderate=2.0, Strong=4.0, Very Strong=8.0 points.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 requires PM3 points from unrelated A-T probands and assigns 4.0, 2.0, 1.0, or 2.0 points for a confident phenotype depending on confirmed trans, phase unknown, an unidentified/VUS second variant, or homozygosity; consistent-phenotype values are half those amounts.
  • The same VCEP table converts total PM3 points to Supporting at 1.0, Moderate at 2.0, Strong at 4.0, and Very Strong at 8.0 points.
  • The consolidated allelic evidence contained no affected-proband, A-T phenotype, homozygous, pathogenic-in-trans, or phase observation for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T.
  • Direct search of ATM_PM3_BP2_1.5.pdf for c.3285-15C>T and p.? found no variant-specific entry.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports grpmax FAF 0.00017606, satisfying the VCEP rarity prerequisite but providing no PM3 observation or phase information.
Still missing
  • No affected A-T proband observation with a documented confident or consistent phenotype.
  • No documented homozygous observation or co-occurring pathogenic/likely pathogenic ATM variant.
  • No parental or other phase evidence establishing trans or phase-unknown status.
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when ATM_PM3_BP2_1.5.pdf was searched.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5gnomad_v4 ↗
PP1 Not assessed: no affected-relative segregation, parental testing, or informative meiosis data are reported for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP specifies PP1 for the autosomal-recessive condition as Supporting with segregation in 1 affected relative, Moderate with 2 affected relatives, and Strong with at least 3 affected relatives. The available case evidence reports no affected relatives, informative meioses, family segregation, or variant-positive/variant-negative relatives for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T. PP1 therefore cannot be assigned.

Rule
ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 PP1: autosomal-recessive condition; Supporting for segregation in 1 affected relative, Moderate for 2, Strong for at least 3
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP PP1 rule assigns Supporting for segregation in 1 affected relative, Moderate for 2 affected relatives, and Strong for at least 3 affected relatives in the autosomal-recessive condition.
  • No affected-relative segregation, parental testing, informative meioses, or non-segregation observations for this variant are documented in the available case evidence.
Still missing
  • Documented affected relatives carrying the variant and their phenotypes
  • Informative family genotypes and phase
  • Number of informative meioses and any non-segregating relatives
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no variant-specific rescue result was found, and ATM VCEP BS3 requires an exact tested-variant readout showing rescue of an ATM feature or radiosensitivity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP v1.6 specification permits BS3 at supporting strength when a variant rescues either an ATM-specific feature or radiosensitivity, and at moderate strength when it rescues both; the governing approved-assay table calibrates assay methodology but is not a per-variant results table. The exact notations NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15C>T, and NP_000042.3:p.? were searched in the full text of clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx and Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; neither governing file contained an exact variant result. The case evidence bundle and paper extracts contain no variant-specific rescue result with assay controls and readout values. Therefore BS3 cannot be assigned from the available evidence.

Rule
Use when a variant rescues both an ATM specific feature (e.g. phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets) AND radiosensitivity. Use when a variant rescues EITHER an ATM specific feature OR rescues radiosensitivity.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP v1.6 BS3 rule: use BS3_Supporting when a variant rescues either an ATM-specific feature or radiosensitivity, and BS3_Moderate when it rescues both.
  • The approved assay table documents positive and negative controls and normal/abnormal assay thresholds for ATM kinase activity and radiosensitivity, but it explicitly does not report which variants were tested.
  • Searches of both governing VCEP full-text files for c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15, and p.? returned no exact variant entry or rescue readout.
Still missing
  • No exact entry for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15C>T, or NP_000042.3:p.? was found in clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx; this file is a calibration/methodology table rather than a per-variant results table.
  • No exact entry for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T, c.3285-15C>T, or NP_000042.3:p.? was found in Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx.
  • No variant-specific approved-assay paper result was available to verify rescue of ATM-specific phosphorylation targets, radiosensitivity, or both.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1vcep_suppl_tables1_pmid_40580951
BP2 Not assessed: no unaffected adult carrying a pathogenic ATM variant in trans, or phase evidence, was reported; the VCEP table has no entry for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP BP2 framework assigns negative points only for unaffected non-A-T adults older than 18 years who carry this variant with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variant in trans, with point values determined by confirmed trans, phase unknown, or laboratory/database setting. The case evidence contains no unaffected adult observation, no documented non-A-T phenotype, no co-occurring pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variant, and no phase information for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T (NP_000042.3:p.?). The governing file ATM_PM3_BP2_1.5.pdf was searched for c.3285-15C>T and p.? and contains no variant-specific entry; consequently no BP2 points or strength can be assigned.

Rule
ATM VCEP BP2: assign negative points from unaffected non-A-T adults with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic ATM variant; BP2 Supporting=-1.0, Moderate=-2.0, Strong at -4.0 or less.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.5 restricts BP2 to unaffected non-A-T adults older than 18 years carrying the variant with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variant, and assigns -4.0 points for confirmed trans, -2.0 for phase unknown, or -2.0/-1.0 for homozygous laboratory/database observations.
  • The same VCEP table converts BP2 totals to Supporting at -1.0, Moderate at -2.0, and Strong at -4.0 or less.
  • The consolidated allelic evidence contained no unaffected-adult, non-A-T, pathogenic-in-trans, homozygous, or phase observation for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T.
  • Direct search of ATM_PM3_BP2_1.5.pdf for c.3285-15C>T and p.? found no variant-specific entry.
Still missing
  • No documented unaffected non-A-T adult older than 18 years carrying the variant.
  • No documented pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variant in the same individual.
  • No parental or other phase evidence establishing trans or phase-unknown status.
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when ATM_PM3_BP2_1.5.pdf was searched.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5
Not applicable · 15· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS2 VCEPNot applicable: the governing ATM VCEP version 1.6 explicitly designates PS2 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP version 1.6 explicitly designates PS2 as Not Applicable. Therefore, generic ACMG/AMP de novo evidence is not used for this ATM assessment, regardless of whether parental testing is reported.

VCEP rule
ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6: PS2 Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP version 1.6 lists PS2 applicability as Not Applicable, so the generic PS2 pathway is not applied.
Sources
PM1 VCEPNot applicable: c.3285-15C>T is intronic with protein consequence p.?, so no amino-acid residue can be evaluated for a missense critical domain. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM1 concerns a rare missense variant located in a critical functional domain or hotspot. This variant is intronic (c.3285-15C>T) with protein consequence p.?, so it has no codon or amino-acid residue to place in a missense domain. The authoritative vcep_materials.json domain_tables object is empty for ATM, and no residue-based PM1 determination is applicable.

VCEP rule
PM1 applies to rare variants located in a critical functional domain or hotspot; no residue-based assessment is applicable to an intronic variant with p.?.
Evidence considered
  • The case normalization identifies c.3285-15C>T as intronic with NP_000042.3:p.? and no reference or alternate amino-acid residue.
  • vcep_materials.json has no ATM entry in its authoritative domain_tables object.
  • PM1 is a codon/domain criterion for missense variation and is not applicable to this noncoding intronic variant.
Sources
PM4 N/ANot applicable: ATM VCEP PM4 is restricted to stop-loss variants, whereas c.3285-15C>T is intronic with no protein-length change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP specifies PM4 for stop-loss variants. NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is intronic, has no protein-length change, and is annotated as NP_000042.3:p.?, so the stop-loss PM4 rule does not apply.

Rule
ATM VCEP PM4: use for stop-loss variants
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP PM4 rule states: use for stop-loss variants.
  • The variant is intronic, with protein annotation NP_000042.3:p.?, so no stop-loss or protein-length change is present.
Sources
PM5 N/ANot applicable: ATM PM5 requires an eligible truncating or same-residue missense comparator, whereas c.3285-15C>T is intronic with protein consequence p.?. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP v1.6 PM5 rule is a gene-specific rule for NMD-prone truncating variants with premature termination codons upstream of p.Leu3048, and the classic same-residue missense PM5 search is not eligible here. c.3285-15C>T is intronic, produces p.?, and has no truncating amino-acid residue or same-residue comparator. The collected PM5 candidate artifact contains zero candidates and confirms classic PM5 search is ineligible.

Rule
ATM PM5 Supporting applies to eligible observed NMD-prone truncating variants upstream of p.Leu3048; classic same-residue missense PM5 is not applicable to this variant.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP PM5 is limited to NMD-prone truncating variants with premature termination codons upstream of p.Leu3048; this variant has protein consequence p.?.
  • The PM5 candidate collection reports classic same-residue missense search ineligible and zero candidates.
  • No codon or amino-acid residue exists for a classic same-residue PM5 comparison.
Sources
cspec ↗pm5_candidates
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the governing ATM VCEP version 1.6 explicitly designates PM6 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP version 1.6 explicitly designates PM6 as Not Applicable. Therefore, generic ACMG/AMP presumed de novo evidence is not used for this ATM assessment.

VCEP rule
ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6: PM6 Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP version 1.6 lists PM6 applicability as Not Applicable, so the generic PM6 pathway is not applied.
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP marks PP2 Not Applicable, and c.3285-15C>T is intronic rather than a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP framework explicitly marks PP2 as Not Applicable. Independently, PP2 is a gene-level missense criterion, while c.3285-15C>T is intronic with protein consequence p.? and is not a missense substitution.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP PP2 is Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP v1.6 framework lists PP2 as Not Applicable.
  • The variant is intronic and has protein consequence p.?, so a gene-level missense enrichment criterion cannot apply.
Sources
PP4 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits separate PP4 use for both ATM-related cancer predisposition and ataxia-telangiectasia. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM HBOP VCEP version 1.6 explicitly marks PP4 not applicable: it is not used for ATM-related cancer predisposition because breast cancer has multiple genetic etiologies, and it is not used separately for autosomal recessive ataxia-telangiectasia because phenotype evidence is incorporated into the ATM PM3/BP2 framework.

VCEP rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6 PP4: Not applicable; do not use for ATM-related breast cancer predisposition or as a separate line for ataxia-telangiectasia.
Evidence considered
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6 states PP4 is not applicable for autosomal dominant ATM-related cancer predisposition and should not be used separately for autosomal recessive ataxia-telangiectasia.
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits PP5, and no exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic assertion exists. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM HBOP VCEP version 1.6 marks PP5 not applicable and instructs that the criterion is not for use. In addition, ClinVar contains no exact-variant expert-panel submission for NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T; the available exact-variant assertions are ordinary laboratory submissions, including Benign/Likely benign classifications, which cannot trigger PP5 under the specified rule.

VCEP rule
PP5 is not applicable under ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6; under the requested ClinVar safeguard, PP5 would require an exact-variant expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification, which is absent.
Evidence considered
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6 states: "This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee."
  • The exact-variant ClinVar audit reports zero expert-panel submissions and only non-expert laboratory submissions; the available classifications are Benign or Likely benign, not Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic.
Sources
BS2 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP explicitly designates BS2 as not applicable, despite zero observed homozygotes in available gnomAD datasets. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP v1.6 marks BS2 as not applicable. Although the variant has no observed homozygotes in the available gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, v2.1 non-cancer, or v3.1 non-cancer datasets, those observations do not override the VCEP's explicit inapplicability designation.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP v1.6: BS2 is not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP version 1.6 explicitly lists BS2 as Not Applicable.
  • The available population data report zero homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, v2.1 non-cancer, and v3.1 non-cancer, but this does not change the governing VCEP designation.
Sources
BS4 VCEPNot applicable: the governing ATM VCEP version 1.6 explicitly designates BS4 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP version 1.6 explicitly designates BS4 as Not Applicable. Therefore, generic ACMG/AMP non-segregation evidence is not used for this ATM assessment.

VCEP rule
ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6: BS4 Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP version 1.6 lists BS4 applicability as Not Applicable, so the generic BS4 pathway is not applied.
Sources
BP1 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP marks BP1 Not Applicable, and c.3285-15C>T is intronic rather than a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP framework explicitly marks BP1 as Not Applicable. BP1 is a benign criterion for missense variants in a gene where missense variation is not a common disease mechanism; c.3285-15C>T is intronic with protein consequence p.? and is not a missense variant.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP BP1 is Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP v1.6 framework lists BP1 as Not Applicable.
  • The variant is intronic with protein consequence p.?, so the missense-specific BP1 criterion cannot apply.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP explicitly marks BP3 as not applicable, and this variant is intronic rather than an in-frame repeat-region indel. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP framework explicitly marks BP3 as Not Applicable. In addition, this variant is intronic rather than an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region, so BP3 is not the applicable benign consequence criterion.

VCEP rule
ATM VCEP BP3 applicability: Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP framework lists BP3 applicability as Not Applicable.
  • NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is intronic and is not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region.
Sources
BP5 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits BP5 because alternate pathogenic variants do not reliably distinguish the phenotype in this low-penetrance disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM HBOP VCEP version 1.6 marks BP5 not applicable and instructs not to use it because multiple pathogenic variants can occur without a noticeable phenotype difference and ATM has low penetrance, making an alternate molecular basis non-discriminating in this context.

VCEP rule
ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6 BP5: Not applicable; do not use.
Evidence considered
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6 states BP5 is not applicable and specifically instructs: "Do not use: Cases with multiple pathogenic variants have been observed with no noticeable difference in phenotype ... In addition, ATM has low penetrance."
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits BP6, and no exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion exists. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM HBOP VCEP version 1.6 marks BP6 not applicable and instructs that the criterion is not for use. Independently, no exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification exists; the available exact-variant Benign/Likely benign assertions are ordinary laboratory submissions and therefore cannot trigger BP6 under the specified rule.

VCEP rule
BP6 is not applicable under ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6; under the requested ClinVar safeguard, BP6 would require an exact-variant expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification, which is absent.
Evidence considered
  • ATM HBOP VCEP v1.6 states: "This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee."
  • The exact-variant ClinVar audit reports zero expert-panel submissions; its Benign and Likely benign assertions are from non-expert clinical laboratories and are excluded from BP6.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.3285-15C>T is intronic, whereas BP7 is restricted here to synonymous variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 is not applicable because the variant is intronic/splice-region (c.3285-15C>T; NP_000042.3:p.?), not synonymous. Under the requested criterion scope, BP7 applies only to synonymous variants, so no SpliceAI, REVEL, or other predictor score is evaluated for BP7.

Rule
Requested scope: BP7 applies only to synonymous variants.
Evidence considered
  • Variant Validator identifies NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T as an intronic sequence variant with NP_000042.3:p.?.
  • The requested criterion scope limits BP7 to synonymous variants; an intronic variant is outside BP7 scope regardless of its predictor scores.
  • The ATM VCEP Version 1.6 BP7 rule describes BP7 for synonymous and deep intronic variants, but the requested adjudication scope is narrower and explicitly restricts BP7 to synonymous variants.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when searching Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; this does not alter BP7 scope because the variant is not synonymous.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
ATM
Transcript
NM_000051.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000042.3:p.?
GRCh38
chr11:108279476 C>T
GRCh37
chr11:108150203 C>T
Location and type
Intron 22 · unknown
ClinVar
379580

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in ATM, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000051.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

ATMNM_000051.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 23 / 1,550,332 alleles AF 1.48e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0.000176
gnomAD v2.1 15 / 243,984 alleles AF 6.15e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0.000224
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 1.5e-05 · 23 / 1,550,332 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 0.00018
Middle Eastern2 / 5,974 0.00033
Admixed American16 / 56,820 0.00028
Remaining individuals3 / 60,358 5e-05
European (non-Finnish)2 / 1,129,430 1.8e-06
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 6.1e-05 · 15 / 243,984 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 0.00022
Admixed American13 / 31,748 0.00041
European (non-Finnish)2 / 105,344 1.9e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: African/African American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.48355e-05; MAF= 0.00148%, 23/1550332 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Middle Eastern population (AF= 0.000334784; MAF= 0.03348%, 2/5974 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00017606.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.14794e-05; MAF= 0.00615%, 15/243984 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 0.000409475; MAF= 0.04095%, 13/31748 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00022392.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +25 bp
0.010
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +15 bp
0.004
SpliceAI donor lossat +48 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +132 bp
0.004
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.002
Pangolin splice gain
0.018

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingMet, supporting: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.01 meets the ATM VCEP BP4 threshold of <=0.1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is evaluated on the SpliceAI path because NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is intronic/splice-region and has NP_000042.3:p.?. The maximum SpliceAI delta is 0.01, which meets the ATM VCEP Version 1.6 BP4 splicing threshold of <=0.1; BP4 Supporting is therefore met. The governing ATM Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx table was searched for c.3285-15C>T and p.?; no pre-assigned BP4 entry for this variant was found.

Rule
ATM VCEP Version 1.6 BP4 Splicing: no predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI <=0.1).
Evidence considered
  • The normalized variant is NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T with predicted protein consequence NP_000042.3:p.?; this is an intronic splice-region variant, so SpliceAI rather than REVEL is the applicable computational path.
  • SpliceAI reports a maximum delta score of 0.01.
  • The ATM VCEP Version 1.6 specification assigns BP4 Supporting for no predicted splicing impact at SpliceAI <=0.1; the observed maximum delta of 0.01 meets that threshold.
  • The generic SpliceAI supporting threshold is also <=0.1, from Jaganathan et al. 2019 (PMID:30661751).
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when searching Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; therefore no pre-assigned BP4 code was available from that governing table.
Sources
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.01 is below the ATM VCEP PP3 threshold of >=0.2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is evaluated on the SpliceAI path because NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T is an intronic splice-region variant with NP_000042.3:p.? and no protein-length-changing consequence. The case SpliceAI result has a maximum delta score of 0.01, below the ATM VCEP Version 1.6 splicing PP3 threshold of >=0.2, so PP3 is not met. The governing ATM Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx table was searched for c.3285-15C>T and p.?; no pre-assigned PP3 or BP4 entry for this variant was found.

Rule
ATM VCEP Version 1.6 PP3 Splicing: predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI >=0.2) for silent, missense/in-frame, and intronic variants outside donor and acceptor 1,2 sites.
Evidence considered
  • The normalized variant is NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T with predicted protein consequence NP_000042.3:p.?; this is an intronic splice-region variant, so SpliceAI rather than REVEL is the applicable computational path.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG 0.004, DS_AL 0.01, DS_DG 0.004, and DS_DL 0.0; the maximum delta is 0.01.
  • The ATM VCEP Version 1.6 specification assigns PP3 Supporting for predicted splicing impact at SpliceAI >=0.2; the observed maximum delta of 0.01 does not meet that threshold.
  • The generic SpliceAI supporting threshold is also >=0.2, from Jaganathan et al. 2019 (PMID:30661751).
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when searching Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; therefore no pre-assigned PP3 code was available from that governing table.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.3285-15C>T is intronic, whereas BP7 is restricted here to synonymous variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 is not applicable because the variant is intronic/splice-region (c.3285-15C>T; NP_000042.3:p.?), not synonymous. Under the requested criterion scope, BP7 applies only to synonymous variants, so no SpliceAI, REVEL, or other predictor score is evaluated for BP7.

Rule
Requested scope: BP7 applies only to synonymous variants.
Evidence considered
  • Variant Validator identifies NM_000051.4:c.3285-15C>T as an intronic sequence variant with NP_000042.3:p.?.
  • The requested criterion scope limits BP7 to synonymous variants; an intronic variant is outside BP7 scope regardless of its predictor scores.
  • The ATM VCEP Version 1.6 BP7 rule describes BP7 for synonymous and deep intronic variants, but the requested adjudication scope is narrower and explicitly restricts BP7 to synonymous variants.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3285-15C>T or p.? was found when searching Suppl_TableS1_PMID 40580951.xlsx; this does not alter BP7 scope because the variant is not synonymous.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01).

8 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021.
    The paper does not mention ATM c.3285-15C>T or a corresponding protein change; it discusses ATM only as a lower-penetrance hereditary breast-cancer gene and does not provide variant-specific phenotype or prevalence evidence.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 34242744 ↗
    Quoted passage
    For women with less penetrant gene mutations (such as ATM, BRIP1, NF1, RAD51C, RAD51D), the Panel strongly favored surveillance without prophylactic mastectomy.

    Genetic testing and management of hereditary breast cancers and syndromes

  • Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.
    Trepanier A et al. · 2004
    This is a general cancer genetic-risk assessment and counseling guideline, not a variant-specific study; it does not mention ATM c.3285-15C>T or provide case-control, phenotype-specific, or expert-panel classification evidence.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 15604628 ↗
    Quoted passage
    The guidelines are intended to provide background information about the process of genetic counseling and risk assessment for hereditary cancer rather than to provide information about specific hereditary cancer syndromes.

    Purpose

  • Development and validation of a new algorithm for the reclassification of genetic variants identified in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
    Pruss D et al. · 2014
    The paper does not report ATM or ATM c.3285-15C>T; it develops and validates a history-weighting algorithm for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant reclassification and supplies no ATM-specific clinical or prevalence data.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25085752 ↗
    Quoted passage
    While being developed for reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, the history weighting algorithm is expected to be applicable to other cancer- and non-cancer-related genes.

    Abstract

  • A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
    Hampel H et al. · 2015
    The paper does not mention ATM c.3285-15C>T and provides general referral guidance rather than variant-level functional, clinical, segregation, prevalence, or expert-panel classification evidence.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25394175 ↗
  • Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment and Counseling (PDQ®): Health Professional Versi
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 26389258 ↗
  • ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
    The paper does not mention ATM or c.3285-15C>T and provides no variant-specific clinical, phenotype, prevalence, or expert-panel classification evidence.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 34012068 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.48355e-05; MAF= 0.00148%, 23/1550332 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Middle Eastern population (AF= 0.000334784; MAF= 0.03348%, 2/5974 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00017606.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.14794e-05; MAF= 0.00615%, 15/243984 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 0.000409475; MAF= 0.04095%, 13/31748 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00022392.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (3 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (2 clinical laboratories) and as Likely Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 379580)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01).

Somatic

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).