0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

ATM c.6200C>A, p.(Ala2067Asp)

NM_000051.4:c.6200C>A NP_000042.3:p.(Ala2067Asp) View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About ATM

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.5.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 3 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 3
PS3Supporting
PS3 · supporting

In a published functional study, lymphoblastoid cells from affected individuals expressed only small amounts of ATM protein, showed no ATM Ser1981 autophosphorylation, and had trace-to-absent phosphorylation of downstream ATM targets; engineered cells expressing the variant also showed trace-to-absent downstream signaling. This demonstrates failure of an ATM-specific functional feature and supports PS3 at supporting strength.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is very rare in gnomAD v4.1, with a total allele frequency of 3.10452e-06 (0.00031%), 5 of 1610556 alleles observed, no homozygotes, and grpmax filtering allele frequency 8e-07. This is below the ATM PM2 threshold of 0.001%, supporting PM2 at supporting strength.

PM3Strong
PM3 · strong

This variant has been reported in multiple affected individuals with variant ataxia-telangiectasia, including homozygous affected members in Canadian Mennonite families. Under the ATM PM3 framework, homozygous affected individuals can contribute points up to the cap of two individuals; this supports PM3 at strong strength.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v1.5.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule12 (1 Pathogenic.Strong + Pathogenic.Supporting >=2) with applied criteria: PM3 strong, PM2 supporting, PS3 supporting; maps to Likely Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
5 / 1,610,556 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 5 / 1,610,556 alleles. Recorded AF 3.10452e-06. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.97905e-06; MAF= 0.00040%, 1/251316 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.79647e-06; MAF= 0.00088%, 1/113682 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

SpliceAI score
0.010 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.010. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
17 reported laboratory submissions

11 Pathogenic · 5 Likely pathogenic · 1 pathogenic.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
2 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53741904, n = 2 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.5.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 6 not met · 3 not assessed · 16 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The ATM c.6200C>A (p.Ala2067Asp; p.A2067D) variant has been reported in ClinVar with multiple pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline submissions, and variant-specific cancer curation has linked it to literature consistent with loss of ATM function.

This variant is very rare in population databases, with gnomAD v4.1 showing an allele frequency of 3.10452e-06 (5/1610556 alleles), no homozygotes, and grpmax filtering allele frequency 8e-07, which supports rarity for ATM.

In a published functional study, patient-derived and engineered cells showed markedly reduced ATM protein, absent ATM Ser1981 autophosphorylation, and trace-to-absent phosphorylation of downstream ATM targets, supporting a damaging effect on ATM function.

Computational evidence does not meet the ATM PP3 or BP4 missense thresholds: REVEL is 0.435, BayesDel is 0.0616905, and SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01.

Met · 3

PS3 SupportingIn a published functional study, lymphoblastoid cells from affected individuals expressed only small amounts of ATM protein, showed no ATM Ser1981 autophosphorylation, and had trace-to-absent phosphorylation of downstream ATM targets; engineered cells expressing the variant also showed trace-to-absent downstream signaling. This demonstrates failure of an ATM-specific functional feature and supports PS3 at supporting strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PS3_Supporting when a variant fails to rescue an ATM-specific feature; moderate requires failure to rescue both ATM-specific feature and radiosensitivity.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:25077176 functional assays showed markedly impaired ATM protein expression and ATM-specific signaling.
Still missing
  • A qualifying assay demonstrating failure to rescue both ATM-specific signaling and radiosensitivity was not confirmed from the available evidence for moderate strength.
Sources
PM2 SupportingThis variant is very rare in gnomAD v4.1, with a total allele frequency of 3.10452e-06 (0.00031%), 5 of 1610556 alleles observed, no homozygotes, and grpmax filtering allele frequency 8e-07. This is below the ATM PM2 threshold of 0.001%, supporting PM2 at supporting strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM2_Supporting for frequency ≤0.001% in gnomAD v4.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 total AF 3.10452e-06
  • 5/1610556 alleles
  • 0 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF 8e-07.
Sources
PM3 StrongThis variant has been reported in multiple affected individuals with variant ataxia-telangiectasia, including homozygous affected members in Canadian Mennonite families. Under the ATM PM3 framework, homozygous affected individuals can contribute points up to the cap of two individuals; this supports PM3 at strong strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM3 point system; homozygous affected individuals may contribute up to the two-individual cap.
Evidence considered
  • PM3 table allows homozygous affected individuals
  • maximum two individuals.
  • PMID:22345219 reported 13 members from 3 families with the homozygous ATM founder mutation and variant A-T.
  • PMID:25077176 described 10 Mennonite patients carrying the variant with variant A-T.
Sources

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 No previously established pathogenic ATM variant producing the same amino acid substitution was identified from the available evidence, so PS1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, with splicing ruled out.
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying same-amino-acid comparator was identified in the reviewed materials.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_ps1_1_5clinvar ↗
PP3 For this missense variant, the REVEL score is 0.435, which is below the ATM PP3 threshold of greater than 0.7333. SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below the splice-impact threshold of 0.2. These results do not support PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Missense REVEL >0.7333 or splice-impact prediction SpliceAI ≥0.2.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.435.
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01.
Sources
BA1 The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 8e-07, which is far below the ATM BA1 threshold of greater than 0.5%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Grpmax filtering AF >0.5% in gnomAD v4.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF 8e-07.
  • ATM BA1 threshold: >0.5%.
Sources
BS1 The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 8e-07, which is well below the ATM BS1 threshold of greater than 0.05%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Grpmax filtering AF >0.05% in gnomAD v4.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF 8e-07.
  • ATM BS1 threshold: >0.05%.
Sources
BS3 Available functional evidence does not show rescue of ATM function. In a published functional study, patient-derived and engineered cells showed markedly reduced ATM protein with absent ATM autophosphorylation and trace-to-absent phosphorylation of downstream ATM targets, which argues against BS3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS3 requires rescue of ATM-specific feature(s) and/or radiosensitivity, depending on strength.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:25077176 reported no ATM Ser1981 autophosphorylation and trace-to-absent transphosphorylation of downstream ATM targets.
Sources
BP4 The REVEL score is 0.435, which is above the ATM BP4 missense threshold of 0.249 or less, so missense computational evidence does not support BP4. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01, but this does not overcome the non-benign missense prediction under the ATM missense BP4 rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Missense REVEL ≤0.249 and/or splice no-impact prediction SpliceAI ≤0.1, applied per ATM specification.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.435.
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01.
  • BayesDel 0.0616905.
Sources

Not assessed · 3 · no assessment recorded

PS4 Published case reports and series were identified, but no qualifying variant-specific case-control result with p-value 0.05 or less and odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk of at least 2, or lower 95% confidence interval of at least 1.5, was confirmed from the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Case-control studies; p-value ≤0.05 and effect estimate ≥2 or lower 95% CI ≥1.5.
Evidence considered
  • ATM PS4 requires qualifying case-control statistics.
Still missing
  • A qualifying variant-specific case-control analysis was not confirmed from the retrieved evidence.
Sources
PP1 Affected family members with this variant were reported, but the available evidence does not provide sufficiently clear segregation counting under the ATM autosomal recessive PP1 framework to assign a PP1 strength level independently of PM3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
AR condition: segregation in 1, 2, or at least 3 affected relatives for supporting, moderate, or strong.
Evidence considered
  • ATM PP1 for AR conditions requires defined affected-relative segregation counts.
Still missing
  • Detailed segregation counts and meioses suitable for ATM AR PP1 scoring were not confirmed from the retrieved evidence.
Sources
BP2 No unaffected adult individual with this variant observed in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variant, and no qualifying benign co-occurrence evidence was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP2 point framework for unaffected non-A-T individuals.
Evidence considered
  • ATM BP2 requires point-based unaffected co-occurrence evidence.
Still missing
  • Phased co-occurrence data in unaffected adults were not identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_pm3_bp2_1_5
Not applicable · 16· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/AThis is a missense variant and does not fall into the ATM or generic PVS1 null-variant categories such as nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, initiation codon, or exon-level loss-of-function events. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PVS1 decision tree for loss-of-function variants only.
Evidence considered
  • PVS1 gene gate eligible for ATM loss of function.
  • Variant-level assessment states this variant is not in a default PVS1 null-variant bucket.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentvcep_atm_pvs1_1_5
PS2 VCEPPS2 is not used for ATM under the ClinGen HBOP ATM specifications. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use PS2.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks PS2 as not applicable.
Sources
PM1 VCEPPM1 is not used for ATM because germline mutational hotspots are not well defined and both benign and pathogenic variants occur within the same domains. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use PM1.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks PM1 as not applicable.
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 is used for ATM stop-loss variants only, and this variant is missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM4 for stop-loss variants only.
Evidence considered
  • ATM PM4 is restricted to stop-loss variants.
Sources
PM5 N/AFor ATM, PM5 is restricted to truncating or qualifying splice variants upstream of p.Arg3047 and is not used for missense changes. This variant is missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM PM5_Supporting only for truncating or qualifying splice variants upstream of p.Arg3047; do not use for missense.
Evidence considered
  • ATM PM5 does not apply to missense variants.
  • PM5 candidate review flagged classic same-residue PM5 as not applicable.
Sources
cspec ↗pm5_candidates
PM6 VCEPPM6 is not used for ATM under the ClinGen HBOP ATM specifications. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use PM6.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks PM6 as not applicable.
Sources
PP2 VCEPPP2 is not used for ATM under the ClinGen HBOP ATM specifications. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use PP2.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks PP2 as not applicable.
Sources
PP4 VCEPPP4 is not used for ATM under this specification because the relevant recessive phenotype evidence is incorporated into the ATM PM3/BP2 framework and the dominant phenotype is genetically heterogeneous. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use PP4.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks PP4 as not applicable.
Sources
PP5 VCEPPP5 is not used in this VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use PP5.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks PP5 as not applicable.
Sources
BS2 VCEPBS2 is not used for ATM under the ClinGen HBOP ATM specifications. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use BS2.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks BS2 as not applicable.
Sources
BS4 VCEPBS4 is not used for ATM under the ClinGen HBOP ATM specifications. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use BS4.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks BS4 as not applicable.
Sources
BP1 VCEPBP1 is not used for ATM under the ClinGen HBOP ATM specifications. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use BP1.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks BP1 as not applicable.
Sources
BP3 VCEPBP3 is not used for ATM under the ClinGen HBOP ATM specifications. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use BP3.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks BP3 as not applicable.
Sources
BP5 VCEPBP5 is not used for ATM under this specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use BP5.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks BP5 as not applicable.
Sources
BP6 VCEPBP6 is not for use in this VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
VCEP rule
ATM VCEP: do not use BP6.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP marks BP6 as not applicable.
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is intended for synonymous or deep intronic variants, not for this missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP7 for synonymous/deep intronic variants or RNA evidence of no splice defect.
Evidence considered
  • ATM BP7 rules apply to synonymous or deep intronic variants.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
ATM
Transcript
NM_000051.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000051.4:c.6200C>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000042.3:p.(Ala2067Asp)
GRCh38
chr11:108317374 C>A
GRCh37
chr11:108188101 C>A
ClinVar
39749, 127374
COSMIC
COSV53741904

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in ATM, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000051.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

ATMNM_000051.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 5 / 1,610,556 alleles AF 3.1e-06 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 8e-07
gnomAD v2.1 1 / 251,316 alleles AF 3.98e-06 · 0 homozygotes

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 3.1e-06 · 5 / 1,610,556 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 8e-07
Remaining individuals1 / 62,278 1.6e-05
European (non-Finnish)4 / 1,178,006 3.4e-06
0 alternate alleles recorded in 8 other groups: Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 4e-06 · 1 / 251,316 alleles · 0 hom
European (non-Finnish)1 / 113,682 8.8e-06
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.10452e-06; MAF= 0.00031%, 5/1610556 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 1.6057e-05; MAF= 0.00161%, 1/62278 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8e-07.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.97905e-06; MAF= 0.00040%, 1/251316 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.79647e-06; MAF= 0.00088%, 1/113682 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -1 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +8 bp
0.010
SpliceAI donor lossat -298 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +147 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.020
Pangolin splice gain
0.020

Other predictors

REVEL
0.435
BayesDel
0.062

How the predictions were used

PP3 For this missense variant, the REVEL score is 0.435, which is below the ATM PP3 threshold of greater than 0.7333. SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below the splice-impact threshold of 0.2. These results do not support PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Missense REVEL >0.7333 or splice-impact prediction SpliceAI ≥0.2.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.435.
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01.
Sources
BP4 The REVEL score is 0.435, which is above the ATM BP4 missense threshold of 0.249 or less, so missense computational evidence does not support BP4. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01, but this does not overcome the non-benign missense prediction under the ATM missense BP4 rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Missense REVEL ≤0.249 and/or splice no-impact prediction SpliceAI ≤0.1, applied per ATM specification.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.435.
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01.
  • BayesDel 0.0616905.
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is intended for synonymous or deep intronic variants, not for this missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ATM BP7 for synonymous/deep intronic variants or RNA evidence of no splice defect.
Evidence considered
  • ATM BP7 rules apply to synonymous or deep intronic variants.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.435. BayesDel score = 0.0616905.

9 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • A-TWinnipeg: Pathogenesis of rare ATM missense mutation c.6200C>A with decreased protein expression and downstream signaling, early-onset dystonia, cancer, and life-threatening radiotoxicity.
    Nakamura K et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25077176 ↗
  • Radiation exposure, the ATM Gene, and contralateral breast cancer in the women's environmental cancer and radiation epidemiology study.
    Bernstein JL et al. · 2010
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20305132 ↗
  • Computational refinement of functional single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ATM gene.
    George Priya Doss C et al. · 2012
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 22529920 ↗
  • Very mild presentation in adult with classical cellular phenotype of ataxia telangiectasia.
    Worth PF et al. · 2013
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23143971 ↗
  • Ataxia telangiectasia: more variation at clinical and cellular levels.
    Taylor AM et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25040471 ↗
  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Prioritizing Variants in Complete Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genes in Patients Lacking Known BRCA Mutations.
    Caminsky NG et al. · 2016
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 26898890 ↗
  • EFNS guidelines on the molecular diagnosis of ataxias and spastic paraplegias.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20050888 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.10452e-06; MAF= 0.00031%, 5/1610556 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 1.6057e-05; MAF= 0.00161%, 1/62278 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8e-07.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.97905e-06; MAF= 0.00040%, 1/251316 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.79647e-06; MAF= 0.00088%, 1/113682 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (11 clinical laboratories) and as Likely pathogenic (5 clinical laboratories) and as pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 39749)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.435. BayesDel score = 0.0616905.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53741904, n = 2 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.