Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely benign. Select a step to read what it means.
This variantScenario
BenignPathogenic
Likely benign.A likely benign classification under the recorded framework.
In plain language
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.
About BRCA2
BRCA2 encodes a DNA repair protein that maintains genome stability by repairing double-strand breaks through homologous recombination and by protecting DNA replication forks. It acts as a tumor suppressor, and inherited loss-of-function changes cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, with elevated lifetime risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers; biallelic changes cause Fanconi anemia complementation group D1. Reduced or altered BRCA2 activity is implicated in multiple tumor types, and PARP inhibitors are an approved treatment for BRCA2-associated ovarian and breast cancers.
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes.
Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a
confident-looking classification can still be wrong.
Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence
before relying on any call.
01The reasoning
How it was classified
The recorded framework is ClinGen BRCA2 VCEP v1.2. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
Recorded applied criteria
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
Met, Supporting: REVEL 0.663 meets the ClinGen SVI PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644 for missense variants.
Benign criteria applied · 1
BS3Strong
BS3 · strong
Met, Strong: ENIGMA Table 9 assigns BS3 Strong from two calibrated neutral studies, including Mesman results of 58% HDR and 84% cisplatin sensitivity versus wild type.
Recorded classification: Likely benign
Likely Benign: ENIGMA assigns BS3 Strong and PP3 Supporting; the net conflicting-evidence score is −3, within the Likely Benign range.
02The sources
Evidence at a glance
Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
39 / 1,614,086 alleles
gnomAD v4.1: 39 / 1,614,086 alleles. Recorded AF 2.41623e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.
gnomAD v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.0606e-05; MAF= 0.00106%, 3/282860 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 2.32259e-05; MAF= 0.00232%, 3/129166 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.92e-06.
ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen BRCA2 VCEP v1.2, with the data and sources behind each one.
28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 9 not met · 5 not assessed · 12 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
For the governing BRCA2 transcript NM_000059.4, c.7484T>C is a missense variant encoding p.(Ile2495Thr); therefore PVS1, PM4, and BP3 are not applicable under ENIGMA v1.2.
The governing VCEP specification was applied instead of generic ACMG fallback rules.
For the requested codon/residue/domain criteria, only BP1 was evaluated against the variant's domain location; PS1, PM1, PM5, and PP2 are excluded or unsupported by the governing ENIGMA rules.
The variant's residue 2495 is within the ENIGMA BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (2481-3186), but the VCEP explicitly disallows PM1 and requires BP1 variants to be outside such domains.
The exact variant was found in all four required governing VCEP file searches using c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T notation; the authoritative Table 9 row assigns BS3 Strong.
The functional evidence is directionally benign: two calibrated mammalian studies report no damaging effect, while the VCEP specification reserves PS3 for damaging protein-function results.
The available variant-specific assay data include Mesman complementation, HDR 58% of wild type, and cisplatin sensitivity 84% of wild type; the second Table 9 study is summarized as neutral.
The exact variant was found in the governing ENIGMA multifactorial table as BRCA2 c.7484T>C / p.(Ile2495Thr) / I2495T, with combined LR 0.7333055058687654.
That combined LR is neutral for both PP4 and BP5 under the criterion-specific ENIGMA operators; no qualifying PS4 case-control statistic was available.
ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel classification, so neither PP5 nor BP6 is triggered by the required expert-panel rule.
The variant is missense, so PP3 and BP4 are evaluated using REVEL only; BP7 is not applicable.
REVEL 0.663 meets the supplied PP3 Supporting threshold (>=0.644) but does not meet the supplied BP4 Supporting threshold (<=0.29).
Population evidence is benign-direction but does not meet ENIGMA BA1 or BS1 thresholds: the maximum applicable non-cancer FAF is 3.23e-06.
PM2 is not met because the variant is observed in both required non-cancer gnomAD datasets.
BS2 remains not assessed because no qualifying phenotyped clinical or research-cohort observations are available; gnomAD homozygote counts are not eligible for this criterion.
No criteria match.
Met · 2
PP3SupportingMet, Supporting: REVEL 0.663 meets the ClinGen SVI PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644 for missense variants.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C is a missense variant, p.(Ile2495Thr), in the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (amino acids 2481-3186). Under the ENIGMA BRCA2 V1.2 framework, computational evidence is evaluated using the missense protein-impact path for this consequence. The case-specific REVEL score is 0.663, which meets the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL supporting threshold of >=0.644 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so PP3 Supporting is met. SpliceAI is not used to support PP3 for this missense substitution.
Rule
Missense variant: use REVEL only; PP3 Supporting at REVEL >=0.644 under the supplied ClinGen SVI calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification defines PP3 for predicted deleterious computational impact and identifies the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain as a clinically important functional domain.
The case-specific REVEL lookup reports a score of 0.663 for BRCA2 c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr).
The supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns PP3 Supporting at REVEL >=0.644 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
The ENIGMA supplementary functional-prediction table contains the exact variant entry c.7484T>C / p.(Ile2495Thr) in the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain, confirming the governing variant match; its listed BayesDel value is not substituted for the missense REVEL path used here.
BS3StrongMet, Strong: ENIGMA Table 9 assigns BS3 Strong from two calibrated neutral studies, including Mesman results of 58% HDR and 84% cisplatin sensitivity versus wild type.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BS3 Strong is met by the governing ENIGMA BRCA2 V1.2 Table 9 pre-assignment for the exact variant c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr; p.I2495T). The row states that two calibrated studies showed protein function similar to benign control variants: Mesman et al. (PMID:29988080) reported complementation, HDR activity of 58% relative to wild type, and cisplatin sensitivity of 84% relative to wild type; Richardson et al. (PMID:33609447) reported a neutral result. Mesman used an mESC complementation assay after loss of endogenous Brca2, an I-Sce1-induced HDR reporter, and cisplatin sensitivity, providing biologically relevant protein/cellular functional testing with calibrated controls. ENIGMA Table 9 is the governing pre-assigned answer and outranks independent threshold calculation.
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA2 V1.2: BS3 applies to well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function when the assay measures protein only or mRNA and protein combined; Table 9 provides calibrated code recommendations.
Evidence considered
Specifications_Table9_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx: the exact c.7484T>C / p.(Ile2495Thr) row pre-assigns BS3 Strong and records two calibrated studies, Mesman 2019 (PMID:29988080) and Richardson 2021 (PMID:33609447), with benign/neutral functional results.
Mesman et al. (PMID:29988080), Table 2 and Fig. 3b: c.7484T>C p.Ile2495Thr complemented the mESC phenotype after endogenous Brca2 loss; HDR was 58% and cisplatin sensitivity was 84% relative to wild type.
ENIGMA Appendix E states that PS3 and BS3 are reserved for protein-function assays, that the selected mammalian assays were calibrated against clinically classified reference variants, and that no functional impact without conflicting damaging evidence supports Strong benign evidence.
PS1Not met: no qualifying pathogenic variant producing the same Ile2495Thr amino-acid change was identified in the governing VCEP materials.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP specification permits PS1 for a missense substitution only when a previously classified pathogenic variant produces the same amino-acid change through a different nucleotide change and has no predicted or confirmed splice effect. Searches of Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, and Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt found no entry for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T, and the available case evidence provides no qualifying pathogenic same-amino-acid comparator. Therefore PS1 is not met.
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 PS1: same missense amino-acid substitution as a previously classified pathogenic variant, with no confirmed or predicted splice effect.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA specifies PS1 for a missense change only when a previously classified pathogenic variant produces the same amino-acid substitution via a different nucleotide change and has no confirmed or predicted splice effect.
The three governing VCEP full-text files were searched for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T; no entry was found.
Still missing
No entry for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No entry for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No entry for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
No qualifying pathogenic same-amino-acid comparator is available in the reviewed case evidence.
PS3Not met: ENIGMA Table 9 assigns BS3 Strong after two calibrated studies found no damaging effect, including 58% HDR and 84% cisplatin sensitivity in Mesman et al.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PS3 is not met. The governing ENIGMA BRCA2 V1.2 Table 9 entry for BRCA2 c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr; p.I2495T) assigns BS3 Strong, not PS3, based on two calibrated protein-function studies showing no damaging effect. Mesman et al. (PMID:29988080) tested the variant in an mESC BRCA2 complementation assay and reported complementation, 58% HDR activity relative to wild type, and 84% cisplatin sensitivity relative to wild type. The independent Table 9 study by Richardson et al. (PMID:33609447) is summarized as neutral. These results support benign functional evidence rather than a damaging effect.
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA2 V1.2: PS3 applies to well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect when the assay measures protein only or mRNA and protein combined; calibrated variant-specific Table 9 assignments govern.
Evidence considered
Specifications_Table9_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx: the exact c.7484T>C / p.(Ile2495Thr) row assigns BS3 Strong and states that two calibrated studies show protein function similar to benign controls; the row identifies Mesman 2019 (PMID:29988080) and Richardson 2021 (PMID:33609447).
Mesman et al. (PMID:29988080) reports complementation of the lethal phenotype after loss of endogenous mouse Brca2, 58% HDR capacity relative to wild-type BRCA2, and 84% cisplatin sensitivity relative to wild type for c.7484T>C p.Ile2495Thr.
ENIGMA Appendix E reserves PS3 for protein-function assays showing a damaging effect and states that no impact in at least one calibrated study without conflict supports Strong benign evidence; the exact VCEP pre-assigned code governs here.
PM2Not met: the variant is observed in both required non-cancer datasets, with 2 alleles in v2.1 exomes and 1 allele in v3.1 genomes.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specifies PM2 Supporting only when the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, with regional read depth at least 25. This variant is observed in both required datasets: 2/236,916 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes (AF 8.44181e-06) and 1/147,990 alleles in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes (AF 6.75721e-06). Because it is not absent from either required control dataset, PM2 is not met regardless of the unreported depth value.
Rule
PM2 Supporting: apply only when absent from gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, with regional average read depth >=25 and acceptable quality.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA specification requires absence from gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, with regional read depth >=25, for PM2 Supporting.
GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER reports 2/236,916 non-cancer exome alleles and GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER reports 1/147,990 non-cancer genome alleles; the variant is therefore not absent from controls.
The exact variant row was found in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt as BRCA2 c.7484T>C, p.(Ile2495Thr), but the row does not establish PM2 absence.
Still missing
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general PM2 rule was found and applied.
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general Appendix G PM2 rule was found and applied.
Regional read depth is not reported in the available non-cancer evidence, but depth cannot change the conclusion because the variant is present in both required datasets.
PP5Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel classification; its available submissions are single-laboratory assertions, not eligible PP5 evidence.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The exact ClinVar record for NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr) has expert_panels: {} and review status limited to conflicting single-submitter laboratory assertions. The available Likely benign assertions are not expert-panel classifications and cannot trigger PP5. ENIGMA's specification also says PP5 is not for use. No pathogenic or likely pathogenic exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification exists in the reviewed record.
Rule
Apply only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification; none is present, and ENIGMA specifies PP5 is not for use.
Evidence considered
ClinVar variation 52342 exactly matches NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr), but source_data.expert_panels is empty and the record has conflicting single-submitter classifications.
The ENIGMA specification states for PP5: "Do not use."
BA1Not met: maximum required non-cancer filter allele frequency was 3.23e-06, below the ENIGMA BA1 threshold of >0.001.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specifies BA1 when filter allele frequency exceeds 0.001 (0.1%) in the preferred non-founder population datasets. The required gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome data show 2/236,916 alleles, AF 8.44181e-06, with maximum exome FAF 3.23e-06; the gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genome data show 1/147,990 alleles, AF 6.75721e-06, with genome FAF 0. Both are far below 0.001, so BA1 is not met. The all-comers gnomAD v4.1 value was not used because the governing VCEP specifies gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes.
Rule
BA1: apply stand-alone benign evidence when filter allele frequency is >0.001 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, using non-founder populations and adequate quality/depth.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA specification sets BA1 at filter allele frequency >0.001 and requires gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes.
GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER reports 2/236,916 non-cancer exome alleles, AF 8.44181e-06, maximum exome FAF 3.23e-06, and zero homozygotes.
GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER reports 1/147,990 non-cancer genome alleles, AF 6.75721e-06, genome FAF 0, and zero homozygotes.
The exact variant row in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt reports c.7484T>C/p.(Ile2495Thr), but its older gnomAD frequency column is not substituted for the governing VCEP FAF dataset.
Still missing
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general BA1 rule was found and applied.
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general Appendix G BA1 rule was found and applied.
BS1Not met: maximum required non-cancer filter allele frequency was 3.23e-06, below the ENIGMA BS1 Supporting threshold of >0.00002.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specifies BS1 Strong for filter allele frequency >0.0001 and BS1 Supporting for >0.00002 to <=0.0001 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes. The required non-cancer datasets show maximum FAF values of 3.23e-06 for gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and 0 for gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes. Both are below the lowest BS1 threshold of >0.00002, so BS1 is not met.
Rule
BS1: apply Strong when FAF >0.0001 or Supporting when FAF >0.00002 and <=0.0001 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, using non-founder populations and adequate quality/depth.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA specification sets BS1 Strong at FAF >0.0001 and BS1 Supporting at FAF >0.00002 to <=0.0001, using gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes.
The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt row lists gnomAD MAF 2.5391021734714605e-05 and a frequency-derived moderate benign direction, but the governing ENIGMA rule requires filter allele frequency from the specified non-cancer datasets; the applicable FAF values remain below BS1 Supporting.
Still missing
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general BS1 thresholds were found and applied.
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general Appendix G BS1 thresholds were found and applied.
BP1Not met: Ile2495 lies inside the ENIGMA DNA-binding domain 2481-3186, whereas BP1 requires a missense variant outside a clinically important domain.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
ENIGMA V1.2 permits BP1_Strong for a missense variant only when it is outside a potentially clinically important functional domain and has no predicted splicing impact. Residue 2495 is inside the ENIGMA BRCA2 DNA-binding domain at amino acids 2481-3186. Because the required outside-domain condition is not satisfied, BP1 is not met; no BP1 strength is assigned.
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 BP1_Strong: missense variant outside a potentially clinically important functional domain and SpliceAI <=0.1.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA V1.2 requires BP1_Strong to be outside a potentially clinically important functional domain and to have no predicted splicing impact.
ENIGMA lists the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain as amino acids 2481-3186; residue 2495 is within this interval.
BP4Not met: REVEL 0.663 exceeds the ClinGen SVI BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.29 for missense variants.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C is a missense variant, p.(Ile2495Thr), so BP4 must be assessed through the missense protein-impact path using REVEL rather than SpliceAI. The case-specific REVEL score is 0.663, exceeding the supplied ClinGen SVI BP4 supporting cutoff of <=0.29 and therefore not supporting a benign/no-impact computational conclusion. The SpliceAI max delta of 0.028 is not used to convert this missense result into BP4 evidence.
Rule
Missense variant: use REVEL only; BP4 Supporting requires REVEL <=0.29 under the supplied ClinGen SVI calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification defines BP4 as computational evidence for no impact and provides BRCA2 missense-domain guidance.
The case-specific REVEL lookup reports a score of 0.663 for BRCA2 c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr).
The supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns BP4 Supporting at REVEL <=0.29 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997); 0.663 does not meet that threshold.
SpliceAI reports a maximum delta of 0.028, but splice prediction is not substituted for the applicable REVEL missense path.
BP6Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel classification; its available Likely benign submissions are ordinary laboratory assertions and cannot trigger BP6.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The exact ClinVar record for NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr) has expert_panels: {} and contains only conflicting single-submitter laboratory assertions. The available Likely benign submissions are not exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classifications and cannot trigger BP6. ENIGMA's specification also says BP6 is not for use. No benign or likely benign exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification exists in the reviewed record.
Rule
Apply only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification; none is present, and ENIGMA specifies BP6 is not for use.
Evidence considered
ClinVar variation 52342 exactly matches NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr), but source_data.expert_panels is empty; Likely benign entries are single-submitter clinical-laboratory assertions.
The ENIGMA specification states for BP6: "Do not use."
PS4Not assessed: the exact variant row lacks a qualifying PS4 case-control OR and p-value, and ENIGMA prohibits using its two observations as proband-counting evidence.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification requires PS4 case-control evidence with p-value <=0.05, OR >=4, and a lower confidence interval excluding 2.0. The exact BRCA2 c.7484T>C / p.Ile2495Thr row in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx has no case-control LR or OR/p-value entry; its combined LR is 0.7333055058687654, which is multifactorial likelihood evidence handled under PP4/BP5 rather than PS4. The source also records two Easton-dataset observations, but the ENIGMA specification says not to use proband counting as originally described. SupplementaryTables_V1.2.xlsx, which declares PS4, was unavailable as searchable full text, so no governing ST7 lookup could be completed.
Rule
Case-control studies; p-value <=0.05 and OR >=4 (lower confidence interval excludes 2.0).
Evidence considered
ENIGMA Table 1 states: "Case-control studies; p-value <=0.05 and OR >=4 (lower confidence interval excludes 2.0)."
The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001 row is BRCA2 c.7484T>C, p.(Ile2495Thr), with blank case-control LR and combined LR 0.7333055058687654; the same row records two Easton-dataset observations.
ENIGMA states: "Do not use Proband Counting as originally described."
Still missing
No qualifying case-control OR, p-value, and confidence interval was available for c.7484T>C in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.
No exact-variant PS4 entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt after searching c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T.
SupplementaryTables_V1.2.xlsx declares PS4 but its full text was unavailable for search; this is a conversion gap, not evidence that the table is empty.
PM3Not assessed: no documented Fanconi anemia phenotype, qualifying BRCA2 co-occurring pathogenic variant, or phase information supports ENIGMA PM3 points.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification restricts PM3 to a patient with a phenotype consistent with BRCA1/2-related Fanconi anemia and a co-occurrent variant in the same gene, with point-based weighting for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in trans or phase-unknown. The available case evidence does not document a Fanconi anemia phenotype, chromosome-breakage result, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA2 co-occurring variant, or phase; therefore no PM3 points or strength can be assigned. The exact-variant rows located in the governing VCEP full-text files concern functional or multifactorial data rather than a qualifying PM3 observation.
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA2 PM3_VariableWeight: apply only for a patient with phenotype consistent with BRCA1- or BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia and a co-occurrent variant in the same gene; PM3_Supporting = 1 point, PM3 = 2 points, PM3_Strong = 4 or more points.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP v1.2 specifies PM3 only for Fanconi anemia-consistent patients with co-occurring variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2; PM3 strength is based on Table 6 points from pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in trans or phase-unknown.
The consolidated case-evidence bundle and direct case JSON files contain no qualifying Fanconi anemia phenotype, chromosome-breakage result, same-gene pathogenic/likely pathogenic co-occurrence, or phase observation for c.7484T>C.
The exact-variant VCEP searches found c.7484T>C / p.Ile2495Thr / p.I2495T in functional and multifactorial tables, but not in a PM3 allelic-observation entry.
Still missing
The governing file Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt was searched for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T; no variant-specific PM3 entry was found.
The case evidence bundle does not provide a Fanconi anemia phenotype or chromosome-breakage result for a carrier of NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C.
The case evidence bundle does not provide a same-gene pathogenic/likely pathogenic co-occurring variant, confirmed trans/cis phase, or sufficient phase-unknown proband observation for this variant.
PP1Not assessed: the exact variant row has no segregation LR, and no quantitative co-segregation result or meiosis count is available for comparison with PP1 LR ≥2.08.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA specification permits PP1 only from quantitative co-segregation analysis, with supporting evidence at LR ≥2.08, moderate at LR ≥4.3, strong at LR ≥18.7, and very strong at LR ≥350. The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001 row for BRCA2 c.7484T>C/p.(Ile2495Thr)/I2495T has a blank Segregation LR field; its combined LR is 0.7333055058687654 and is explicitly described as not <0.5 or >2, so it does not establish a PP1 segregation result. No variant-specific co-segregation or meiosis count was found in the searched case evidence or extracted literature. The designated SupplementaryTables_V1.2.xlsx full text was unavailable, so its BS4/PS4 table could not be independently searched.
Rule
Apply weight as per Bayes Score: PP1 LR ≥2.08:1; PP1_Moderate LR ≥4.3:1; PP1_Strong LR ≥18.7:1; PP1_Very Strong LR ≥350:1. LR >0.48 and <2.08 provides no supporting evidence in either direction.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP Specifications v1.2, Table 1: PP1 is assigned from quantitative co-segregation analysis using LR thresholds of 2.08, 4.3, 18.7, and 350 for supporting, moderate, strong, and very strong evidence, respectively.
HUMU-40-1557-s001 exact row for BRCA2 c.7484T>C, p.(Ile2495Thr), legacy I2495T: Segregation LR is blank; combined LR is 0.7333055058687654 and is labeled ‘Combined LR is not <0.5 or >2’.
The case evidence bundle and its extracted paper findings contain no variant-specific parental testing, affected-relative segregation, meiosis count, or quantitative co-segregation result.
Still missing
No variant-specific quantitative co-segregation LR, affected-relative meioses, or family pedigree data were found in the case evidence bundle.
HUMU-40-1557-s001 was searched for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T; the exact row has a blank Segregation LR field.
SupplementaryTables_V1.2.xlsx full text was unavailable and could not be independently searched.
BS2Not assessed: gnomAD reports zero homozygotes, but no qualifying phenotyped healthy-adult or clinical-cohort BS2 observations are available.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP limits BS2 to qualifying healthy-adult or clinically phenotyped observations, including specified co-occurrence or homozygous presentations, and explicitly excludes homozygote observations from gnomAD frequency data. The available gnomAD non-cancer datasets report zero homozygotes, but they do not provide the required phenotyped clinical or research-cohort observations, age/follow-up, co-occurrence phase, or Fanconi-anemia assessment. Therefore BS2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.
Rule
BS2: apply only from qualifying clinically or research-cohort phenotyped individuals meeting the ENIGMA Table 8/Appendix H age, phase, co-occurrence or homozygote, and Fanconi-anemia stipulations; do not use gnomAD frequency observations.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA specification and Appendix H require BS2 point-based evidence from phenotyped individuals and state that gnomAD homozygote observations must not be used for BS2.
GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER and GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER each report zero homozygotes, which does not constitute a qualifying BS2 observation.
Still missing
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general BS2 rule was found and applied.
No variant-specific row for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; its general Appendix H BS2 rule was found and applied.
No qualifying phenotyped clinical or research-cohort observations with age/follow-up, phase, co-occurrence, homozygous status, and Fanconi-anemia assessment were identified.
BS4Not assessed: the exact variant row has no segregation LR, and the available combined LR 0.7333 is above the BS4 supporting threshold of ≤0.48.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA specification permits BS4 only from quantitative lack-of-segregation analysis, with supporting evidence at LR ≤0.48, moderate at LR ≤0.23, strong at LR ≤0.05, and very strong at LR ≤0.00285. The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001 row for BRCA2 c.7484T>C/p.(Ile2495Thr)/I2495T has a blank Segregation LR field; the available combined LR is 0.7333055058687654, explicitly outside the informative benign range (>0.48 and <2 is neutral), and does not constitute a BS4 segregation LR. No variant-specific non-segregation, affected-relative genotype, or pedigree data were found. The designated SupplementaryTables_V1.2.xlsx full text was unavailable, so its BS4/PS4 table could not be independently searched.
Rule
Apply weight as per Bayes Score: BS4_Supporting LR ≤0.48:1; BS4_Moderate LR ≤0.23:1; BS4 LR ≤0.05:1; BS4_Very Strong LR ≤0.00285:1. LR >0.48 and <2.08 provides no supporting evidence in either direction.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP Specifications v1.2, Table 1: BS4 is assigned from quantitative lack-of-segregation analysis using LR thresholds of ≤0.48, ≤0.23, ≤0.05, and ≤0.00285 for supporting, moderate, strong, and very strong evidence, respectively.
HUMU-40-1557-s001 exact row for BRCA2 c.7484T>C, p.(Ile2495Thr), legacy I2495T: Segregation LR is blank; combined LR is 0.7333055058687654 and is labeled ‘Combined LR is not <0.5 or >2’, which is outside the informative BS4 range.
The case evidence bundle and its extracted paper findings contain no variant-specific parental testing, affected-relative non-segregation, meiosis count, or quantitative BS4 result.
Still missing
No variant-specific quantitative non-segregation LR, affected-relative genotype data, or family pedigree data were found in the case evidence bundle.
HUMU-40-1557-s001 was searched for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T; the exact row has a blank Segregation LR field.
SupplementaryTables_V1.2.xlsx full text was unavailable and could not be independently searched.
Not applicable · 12· recorded as not applicableShow reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴PVS1N/ANot applicable: p.(Ile2495Thr) is a missense variant, whereas ENIGMA PVS1 is restricted to specified null variants and canonical splice changes.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The case variant is NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C, encoding the missense substitution p.(Ile2495Thr) (p.(I2495T)). ENIGMA BRCA2 v1.2 limits PVS1 to null-variant mechanisms, including initiation, nonsense/frameshift, exon deletion/duplication, and canonical ±1,2 splice variants, with exon-specific application in Table 4. This missense variant is therefore outside the PVS1 decision tree; no PVS1 strength is assigned. Exact searches for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T found no variant-level entry in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx, Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 PVS1_VariableWeight applies only to null-variant mechanisms and specified canonical splice variants; missense substitutions are outside the PVS1 decision tree.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification defines PVS1 as variable-weight evidence for null variants in a gene where loss of function is a known disease mechanism and directs null-variant decisions to the PVS1 flowchart and Table 4.
The ENIGMA BRCA2 Table 4 decision tree covers initiation, nonsense/frameshift, deletion, duplication, and canonical ±1,2 splice variants; c.7484T>C is none of these and produces p.(Ile2495Thr).
The governing reference transcript is BRCA2 NM_000059.4, matching the case variant transcript.
Still missing
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
PS2VCEPNot applicable: ENIGMA explicitly prohibits PS2 for BRCA1/2-related cancers because de novo predictive capacity is uncalibrated.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP specification explicitly states that PS2 is not to be used for BRCA1/2-related cancers because these cancers occur relatively commonly and there is no information to calibrate the predictive capacity of de novo occurrences. The case materials therefore cannot produce an applicable PS2 call, regardless of whether any de novo observation were reported.
VCEP rule
Do not use; BRCA1/2-related cancers occur relatively commonly and there is no information to calibrate the predictive capacity of de novo occurrences.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP Specifications v1.2, Table 1: PS2 is marked ‘Do not use’ because BRCA1/2-related cancers are relatively common and de novo predictive capacity is not calibrated.
PM1VCEPNot applicable: Ile2495 lies in the DNA-binding domain, but ENIGMA V1.2 explicitly prohibits PM1 and routes domain evidence to bioinformatic analysis.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
Although residue 2495 lies within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain listed by the ENIGMA appendices as amino acids 2481-3186, the governing ENIGMA V1.2 specification explicitly states that PM1 is not used for BRCA2 and that domain/hotspot information is considered as part of bioinformatic analysis instead. vcep_materials.json has no domain_tables entry for BRCA2.
VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 PM1: Do not use; domain/hotspot evidence is considered within bioinformatic analysis.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA V1.2 Table 1 states PM1 is not used for BRCA1/2 and is considered as a component of bioinformatic analysis.
The ENIGMA BRCA2 domain table lists the DNA-binding domain as amino acids 2481-3186, placing residue 2495 inside that domain.
vcep_materials.json contains an empty domain_tables object, so no gene-specific domain_tables override is present.
PM4VCEPNot applicable: p.(Ile2495Thr) changes one amino acid without altering protein length, and ENIGMA explicitly instructs that PM4 is not used.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C, p.(Ile2495Thr), and does not change protein length. ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 explicitly states that PM4 is not to be used; its defined scope is protein-length change from an in-frame deletion/insertion in a non-repeat region or a stop-loss variant, with such information considered through PP3/BP4 instead. Exact searches for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T found no variant-level entry in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx, Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.
VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 PM4: do not use; protein-length changes are considered through bioinformatic analysis rather than PM4.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA specification defines PM4 for protein-length changes caused by in-frame insertions/deletions in non-repeat regions or stop-loss variants, then explicitly states 'Do not use.'
c.7484T>C is a missense substitution producing p.(Ile2495Thr), so it is neither an in-frame insertion/deletion nor a stop-loss variant and preserves protein length.
Still missing
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
PM5N/ANot applicable: c.7484T>C is missense, while ENIGMA reserves PM5 for protein-termination-codon logic and does not use classic missense PM5.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The governing ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification explicitly states that classic missense PM5 is not used and is considered as a component of bioinformatic analysis. Its repurposed PM5_VariableWeight (PTC) applies only to protein-termination-codon variants in specified exons, whereas c.7484T>C is a missense variant producing p.Ile2495Thr. The governing Table 4 search also contains no entry for this variant.
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 PM5: Do not use classic missense PM5; repurposed PM5 applies only to genomic PTC variants.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA V1.2 states that classic missense PM5 is not used and is considered as part of bioinformatic analysis.
ENIGMA V1.2 defines PM5_VariableWeight (PTC) for genomic protein-termination-codon variants only; this variant is missense.
The case PM5 candidate assessment found no eligible classic missense comparator and identifies the governing PM5 mode as PTC/truncating logic.
Still missing
No entry for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
PM6VCEPNot applicable: ENIGMA explicitly prohibits PM6 because de novo predictive capacity for BRCA1/2-related cancers is uncalibrated.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP specification explicitly states that PM6 is not to be used for BRCA1/2-related cancers because these cancers occur relatively commonly and there is no information to calibrate the predictive capacity of de novo occurrences without confirmed paternity and maternity. This criterion is therefore not applicable.
VCEP rule
Do not use; BRCA1/2-related cancers occur relatively commonly and there is no information to calibrate the predictive capacity of de novo occurrences.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP Specifications v1.2, Table 1: PM6 is marked ‘Do not use’ for BRCA1/2-related cancers for the same calibration limitation as PS2.
PP2VCEPNot applicable: ENIGMA V1.2 explicitly prohibits PP2 for BRCA2 because benign missense variation is frequent.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The governing ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification explicitly states that PP2 is not used because BRCA2 has a high frequency of benign missense variants. No generic PP2 evidence is applicable against this gene-specific rule.
VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 PP2: Do not use for BRCA2 because of high frequency of benign missense variants.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA V1.2 Table 1 marks PP2 as do not use and gives high frequency of benign missense variants as the reason.
PP4N/ANot applicable: combined LR 0.7333055058687654 >= 2.08? no, so it does not reach ENIGMA's PP4 Supporting threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
ENIGMA restricts PP4 to clinically calibrated multifactorial likelihood evidence and specifies PP4 Supporting at LR >=2.08:1, with the neutral interval >0.48 and <2.08 not applicable. The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001 row for c.7484T>C / p.Ile2495Thr gives combined LR 0.7333055058687654. The governing operator is >=. Explicit inequality: 0.7333055058687654 >= 2.08? no. The same value is not in the neutral interval's pathogenic direction threshold, so PP4 is not applicable.
Rule
PP4 - LR >=2.08:1; combined LR 1.00 to <2.08 is not informative.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA Table 1 states: "PP4 - LR >=2.08:1" and that combined LR 1.00 to <2.08 is not informative.
The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001 row for BRCA2 c.7484T>C / p.(Ile2495Thr) reports combined LR 0.7333055058687654 and labels it "Combined LR is not <0.5 or >2".
BP2VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP prohibits BP2 and permits it only in the context of BS2.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The governing ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification marks BP2 as not to be used and states that it is applied only in the context of BS2. BP2 therefore is not applicable for this BRCA2 variant, regardless of whether a co-occurrence observation is available.
VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA2 BP2: do not use; applied only in the context of BS2.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP v1.2 Table 1 explicitly states for BP2: Do not use; applied only in the context of BS2.
BP3VCEPNot applicable: p.(Ile2495Thr) is a missense substitution, while ENIGMA BP3 is restricted to in-frame indels in repetitive regions without known function and is not used.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C, p.(Ile2495Thr), not an in-frame deletion or insertion. ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 explicitly states that BP3 is not to be used and defines it only for in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions without known function, with repeat/domain considerations captured by bioinformatic analysis. Exact searches for c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, and p.I2495T found no variant-level entry in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx, Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.
VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 BP3: do not use; the criterion is limited to in-frame indels in repetitive regions without known function and is captured by bioinformatic/domain analysis.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA specification defines BP3 only for in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function and explicitly states 'Do not use.'
c.7484T>C produces a missense substitution rather than an in-frame deletion or insertion, so BP3 does not apply regardless of local repeat context.
Still missing
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
No exact c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr, or p.I2495T entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
BP5N/ANot applicable: combined LR 0.7333055058687654 <= 0.48? no, placing it in ENIGMA's neutral BP5 interval.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
ENIGMA restricts BP5 to clinically calibrated multifactorial likelihood evidence against pathogenicity and specifies BP5 Supporting at LR <=0.48:1; combined LR >0.48 and <1.00 is not informative. The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001 row for c.7484T>C / p.Ile2495Thr gives combined LR 0.7333055058687654. The governing operator is <=. Explicit inequality: 0.7333055058687654 <= 0.48? no. Because the value is above 0.48 and below 1.00, BP5 is not applicable.
Rule
BP5 - LR <=0.48:1; combined LR >0.48-1.00 is not informative.
Evidence considered
ENIGMA Table 1 states: "BP5 - LR <=0.48 to >0.23:1" and that combined LR >0.48-1.00 is not informative.
The exact HUMU-40-1557-s001 row for BRCA2 c.7484T>C / p.(Ile2495Thr) reports combined LR 0.7333055058687654 and labels it "Combined LR is not <0.5 or >2".
BP7N/ANot applicable: c.7484T>C is missense, whereas BP7 is restricted to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 applies only to synonymous (silent) variants or, under the ENIGMA specification, qualifying deep intronic variants. NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C is a missense variant encoding p.(Ile2495Thr), so BP7 is outside its scope and no predictor score is evaluated for this criterion.
Rule
BP7 is applicable only to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants; missense variants are out of scope.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification restricts BP7 to silent variants and qualifying intronic variants with no predicted splice impact.
The case normalization identifies c.7484T>C as the missense substitution p.(Ile2495Thr).
AF 2.4e-05 · 39 / 1,614,086 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 2.3e-05
Remaining individuals2 / 62,488
3.2e-05
European (non-Finnish)37 / 1,180,004
3.1e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 8 other groups: Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.
gnomAD v2.1
AF 1.1e-05 · 3 / 282,860 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 2.9e-06
European (non-Finnish)3 / 129,166
2.3e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.
Statements
gnomAD v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.41623e-05; MAF= 0.00242%, 39/1614086 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 3.20061e-05; MAF= 0.00320%, 2/62488 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.313e-05.
gnomAD v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.0606e-05; MAF= 0.00106%, 3/282860 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 2.32259e-05; MAF= 0.00232%, 3/129166 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.92e-06.
gnomAD-Canada
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
SpliceAI and Pangolin
SpliceAI acceptor lossat +35 bp
0.028
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -48 bp
0.006
SpliceAI donor lossat -291 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +133 bp
0.002
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.011
Pangolin splice gain
0.011
Other predictors
REVEL
0.663
BayesDel
0.100
How the predictions were used
PP3SupportingMet, Supporting: REVEL 0.663 meets the ClinGen SVI PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644 for missense variants.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C is a missense variant, p.(Ile2495Thr), in the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (amino acids 2481-3186). Under the ENIGMA BRCA2 V1.2 framework, computational evidence is evaluated using the missense protein-impact path for this consequence. The case-specific REVEL score is 0.663, which meets the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL supporting threshold of >=0.644 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so PP3 Supporting is met. SpliceAI is not used to support PP3 for this missense substitution.
Rule
Missense variant: use REVEL only; PP3 Supporting at REVEL >=0.644 under the supplied ClinGen SVI calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification defines PP3 for predicted deleterious computational impact and identifies the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain as a clinically important functional domain.
The case-specific REVEL lookup reports a score of 0.663 for BRCA2 c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr).
The supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns PP3 Supporting at REVEL >=0.644 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
The ENIGMA supplementary functional-prediction table contains the exact variant entry c.7484T>C / p.(Ile2495Thr) in the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain, confirming the governing variant match; its listed BayesDel value is not substituted for the missense REVEL path used here.
BP4Not met: REVEL 0.663 exceeds the ClinGen SVI BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.29 for missense variants.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C is a missense variant, p.(Ile2495Thr), so BP4 must be assessed through the missense protein-impact path using REVEL rather than SpliceAI. The case-specific REVEL score is 0.663, exceeding the supplied ClinGen SVI BP4 supporting cutoff of <=0.29 and therefore not supporting a benign/no-impact computational conclusion. The SpliceAI max delta of 0.028 is not used to convert this missense result into BP4 evidence.
Rule
Missense variant: use REVEL only; BP4 Supporting requires REVEL <=0.29 under the supplied ClinGen SVI calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification defines BP4 as computational evidence for no impact and provides BRCA2 missense-domain guidance.
The case-specific REVEL lookup reports a score of 0.663 for BRCA2 c.7484T>C (p.Ile2495Thr).
The supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration assigns BP4 Supporting at REVEL <=0.29 (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997); 0.663 does not meet that threshold.
SpliceAI reports a maximum delta of 0.028, but splice prediction is not substituted for the applicable REVEL missense path.
BP7N/ANot applicable: c.7484T>C is missense, whereas BP7 is restricted to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 applies only to synonymous (silent) variants or, under the ENIGMA specification, qualifying deep intronic variants. NM_000059.4:c.7484T>C is a missense variant encoding p.(Ile2495Thr), so BP7 is outside its scope and no predictor score is evaluated for this criterion.
Rule
BP7 is applicable only to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants; missense variants are out of scope.
Evidence considered
The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 V1.2 specification restricts BP7 to silent variants and qualifying intronic variants with no predicted splice impact.
The case normalization identifies c.7484T>C as the missense substitution p.(Ile2495Thr).
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.03). REVEL score = 0.663. BayesDel score = 0.0999603.
8 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification.
Cited in the classification
The functional impact of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2.
Mesman RLS et al. · 2019 Feb
The paper explicitly evaluated BRCA2 c.7484T>C, p.Ile2495Thr (NP_000050.3:p.(I2495T)) in an mESC-based functional assay. The variant complemented the lethal phenotype caused by loss of endogenous mouse Brca2, with HDR capacity of 58% relative to wild-type BRCA2 and cisplatin sensitivity of 84% of the wild-type control value.
Location Table 2, exon 15; HDR result also shown in Fig. 3b
Context Mouse embryonic stem cell assay measuring complementation after Cre-mediated loss of endogenous Brca2, HDR capacity using an I-Sce1-induced double-strand-break DR-GFP reporter, and cisplatin sensitivity relative to wild-type BRCA2-expressing cells.
Other recorded publications
Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay.
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Comprehensive annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants by functionally validated sequence-based computational prediction models.
Hart SN et al. · 2019
The exact protein variant I2495T is shown among the 207 BRCA2 missense variants evaluated in the study's homology-directed repair assay dataset and displayed in Figure 1, but the extracted paper text does not provide a variant-specific HDR value or categorical result for I2495T.
Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification.
Parsons MT et al. · 2019
The paper describes an ENIGMA multifactorial likelihood model that can incorporate co-segregation and family-history data, but the extracted full text does not explicitly identify BRCA2 c.7484T>C, p.(I2495T), or any variant-specific segregation observation for this variant.
Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co-segregation, family cancer history profile, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case-control information.
Abstract
Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
gnomAD v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.41623e-05; MAF= 0.00242%, 39/1614086 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 3.20061e-05; MAF= 0.00320%, 2/62488 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.313e-05.
gnomAD v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.0606e-05; MAF= 0.00106%, 3/282860 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 2.32259e-05; MAF= 0.00232%, 3/129166 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.92e-06.
gnomAD-Canada
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (5 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (4 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain Significance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 52342)
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.03). REVEL score = 0.663. BayesDel score = 0.0999603.
Functional
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Neutral; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Neutral.
Somatic
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV99061631, n = 1 times).
Cancer Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
This variant was interpreted by pipeline 8.0.0.
The current version is 11.0.07.
Re-running queues a fresh interpretation; the result replaces this page when complete.
Re-runs are not free. Blank draws on today's public interpretation allowance; with a code, it uses one of that code's uses.