0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

BRCA2 c.9014_9015del, p.(Arg3005IlefsTer12)

NM_000059.4:c.9014_9015del NP_000050.3:p.(Arg3005IlefsTer12) View identifiers
Classification
Pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Pathogenic.A pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About BRCA2

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen BRCA2 VCEP v1.2.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

This variant is a frameshift deletion in BRCA2 that is predicted to introduce a premature termination codon, and BRCA2 loss of function is an established disease mechanism in the ENIGMA BRCA2 framework. The variant is in exon 23, where the ENIGMA exon-level null-variant table supports full-strength PVS1 for truncating variants.

PM5Strong
PM5 · strong

This protein-truncating variant occurs in BRCA2 exon 23, and the ENIGMA BRCA2 exon-level null-variant table assigns PM5_PTC Strong to exon 23. This supports additional pathogenic weight for a premature termination codon variant in an exon where pathogenic truncating variants have already been established.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Pathogenic

ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 Specification v1.2 final-classification framework (Table 3 adapted ACMG/AMP criteria-combination rules)

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
Not recorded

gnomAD v4.1 allele counts were not recorded for this variant.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

No listed criterion applied
No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen BRCA2 VCEP v1.2.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 2 not met · 9 not assessed · 15 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The BRCA2 c.9014_9015del (p.Arg3005IlefsTer12) variant has not been observed in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar as pathogenic, including ENIGMA expert panel review.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, although ENIGMA does not apply PM2_Supporting to insertion, deletion, or delins variants.

ENIGMA BRCA2 null-variant guidance supports full-strength PVS1 for truncating variants in exon 23 and assigns PM5_PTC Strong to this exon, consistent with a deleterious premature termination event.

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.23.

Met · 2

PVS1 Very strongThis variant is a frameshift deletion in BRCA2 that is predicted to introduce a premature termination codon, and BRCA2 loss of function is an established disease mechanism in the ENIGMA BRCA2 framework. The variant is in exon 23, where the ENIGMA exon-level null-variant table supports full-strength PVS1 for truncating variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PVS1 with exon-specific Table 4 guidance
Evidence considered
  • BRCA2 loss of function is established in the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification.
  • NM_000059.4:c.9014_9015del causes p.(Arg3005IlefsTer12).
  • The variant maps to exon 23.
  • ENIGMA Table 4 marks exon 23 truncating variants as PVS1.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentvcep_s_p_e_c_i_f_i_c_a_t_i_o_n_s___t_a_b_l_e_4___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8
PM5 StrongThis protein-truncating variant occurs in BRCA2 exon 23, and the ENIGMA BRCA2 exon-level null-variant table assigns PM5_PTC Strong to exon 23. This supports additional pathogenic weight for a premature termination codon variant in an exon where pathogenic truncating variants have already been established. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PM5_PTC exon-specific Table 4 guidance
Evidence considered
  • The variant is a protein-truncating frameshift.
  • The variant is in BRCA2 exon 23.
  • ENIGMA Table 4 lists exon 23 as PM5_Strong (PTC).
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_s_p_e_c_i_f_i_c_a_t_i_o_n_s___t_a_b_l_e_4___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8

Not met · 2 · evaluated, threshold not reached

BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so it does not exceed the ENIGMA BA1 threshold of filter allele frequency greater than 0.1% (FAF > 0.001). BA1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BA1
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
  • BA1 threshold is FAF > 0.001.
Sources
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so it does not exceed the ENIGMA BS1 thresholds of filter allele frequency above 0.002% (FAF > 0.00002) for BS1_Supporting or above 0.01% (FAF > 0.0001) for BS1. BS1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BS1
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
  • BS1 thresholds are FAF > 0.00002 and FAF > 0.0001.
Sources

Not assessed · 9 · no assessment recorded

PS3 No variant-specific calibrated functional study supporting a damaging effect was identified for this deletion in the curated ENIGMA functional assay table. Available evidence does not support applying PS3 at this time. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PS3
Evidence considered
  • No matching entry was identified for this variant in ENIGMA Table 9.
Still missing
  • No variant-specific calibrated protein functional assay result was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_s_p_e_c_i_f_i_c_a_t_i_o_n_s___t_a_b_l_e_9___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8
PS4 This variant has been reported in ClinVar, including expert panel review, but no qualifying case-control statistic, odds ratio, or ENIGMA proband-count evidence was identified to support PS4. Available evidence is insufficient to apply PS4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PS4
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar reports pathogenic submissions including ENIGMA expert panel review.
  • No qualifying PS4-specific dataset entry was identified in the reviewed ENIGMA supporting tables for this frameshift variant.
Still missing
  • No case-control study or proband-count dataset meeting ENIGMA PS4 requirements was identified.
Sources
clinvar ↗cspec ↗vcep_s_u_p_p_l_e_m_e_n_t_a_r_y_t_a_b_l_e_s___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8vcep_h_u_m_u___4_0___1_5_5_7___s_0_0_1
PM3 No evidence was identified that this variant was observed in trans with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant in a patient with BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia. Available evidence does not support applying PM3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PM3
Evidence considered
  • No PM3-eligible phenotype or trans observation was identified.
Still missing
  • No qualifying biallelic BRCA2 Fanconi anemia observation was identified.
Sources
PP1 No quantitative segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PP1
Evidence considered
  • No segregation dataset was identified.
Still missing
  • No family segregation likelihood ratio was identified.
Sources
PP4 No multifactorial likelihood ratio meeting ENIGMA thresholds was identified, so PP4 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PP4
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying PP4 likelihood ratio was identified in the reviewed supporting materials.
Still missing
  • No qualifying multifactorial likelihood analysis result was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_s_u_p_p_l_e_m_e_n_t_a_r_y_t_a_b_l_e_s___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8vcep_h_u_m_u___4_0___1_5_5_7___s_0_0_1
BS2 No evidence was identified that this variant was observed under ENIGMA BS2 conditions, such as biallelic observation without Fanconi anemia features. Available evidence does not support applying BS2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BS2
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying BS2 point-based evidence was identified.
Still missing
  • No BS2-eligible observations were identified.
Sources
BS3 No variant-specific calibrated functional study showing no damaging effect was identified for this deletion in the curated ENIGMA functional assay table. Available evidence does not support applying BS3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BS3
Evidence considered
  • No matching benign functional assay entry was identified for this variant in ENIGMA Table 9.
Still missing
  • No variant-specific calibrated benign functional assay result was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_s_p_e_c_i_f_i_c_a_t_i_o_n_s___t_a_b_l_e_9___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8
BS4 No quantitative evidence showing lack of segregation with disease was identified, so BS4 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BS4
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying BS4 segregation data were identified.
Still missing
  • No segregation likelihood ratio supporting non-segregation was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_s_u_p_p_l_e_m_e_n_t_a_r_y_t_a_b_l_e_s___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8vcep_h_u_m_u___4_0___1_5_5_7___s_0_0_1
BP5 No multifactorial likelihood ratio against pathogenicity meeting ENIGMA thresholds was identified, so BP5 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP5
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying BP5 likelihood ratio was identified in the reviewed supporting materials.
Still missing
  • No qualifying multifactorial likelihood ratio against pathogenicity was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_s_u_p_p_l_e_m_e_n_t_a_r_y_t_a_b_l_e_s___v_1___2___2_0_2_4___1_1___1_8vcep_h_u_m_u___4_0___1_5_5_7___s_0_0_1
Not applicable · 15· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/AThis variant is a frameshift deletion rather than a missense substitution or a same-splicing-event comparison, so the ENIGMA PS1 rule does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PS1
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is frameshift with premature termination.
Sources
PS2 N/ANo de novo framework is used for BRCA1/2-related cancers in the ENIGMA specification, so PS2 is not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PS2
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification states PS2 is not used.
Sources
PM1 N/AThe ENIGMA BRCA2 specification designates PM1 as not applicable because critical-domain information is incorporated into the bioinformatic framework rather than used as an independent criterion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PM1
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification marks PM1 as do not use.
Sources
PM2 N/AThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, but the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification does not apply PM2_Supporting to insertion, deletion, or delins variants. Therefore PM2 is not applied for this deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PM2
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
  • ENIGMA states PM2_Supporting is not applied to insertion/deletion/delins variants.
Sources
PM4 N/AThis criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PM4
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification marks PM4 as not applicable.
Sources
PM6 N/ANo de novo framework is used for BRCA1/2-related cancers in the ENIGMA specification, so PM6 is not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PM6
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification states PM6 is not used.
Sources
PP2 N/AThis criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PP2
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification marks PP2 as not applicable.
Sources
PP3 N/ASpliceAI predicts possible splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.23, which is above the ENIGMA PP3 splice threshold of 0.2. However, the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification states that PP3 should not be applied when PVS1 is met at any strength, so PP3 is not applied here. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PP3
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.23.
  • ENIGMA states not to apply PP3 if PVS1 is met at any strength.
Sources
PP5 N/AThis criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PP5
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification marks PP5 as not applicable.
Sources
BP1 N/AThis variant is a frameshift deletion, not a silent, missense, or in-frame variant outside a clinically important domain, so BP1 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP1
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is frameshift.
Sources
BP2 N/AThis criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP2
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification marks BP2 as not applicable.
Sources
BP3 N/AThis criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP3
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification marks BP3 as not applicable.
Sources
BP4 N/AThis variant is not a missense, in-frame, silent, or non-canonical intronic variant eligible for BP4, and SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.23, which is above the BP4 splice threshold of 0.1. BP4 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP4
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is frameshift.
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.23.
  • BP4 requires SpliceAI 0.1 or lower in eligible variant classes.
Sources
BP6 N/AThis criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP6
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification marks BP6 as not applicable.
Sources
BP7 N/AThis variant is a frameshift deletion rather than a silent or eligible intronic variant, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP7
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is frameshift.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
BRCA2
Transcript
NM_000059.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000059.4:c.9014_9015del
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000050.3:p.(Arg3005IlefsTer12)
GRCh38
chr13:32379806 AAG>A
GRCh37
chr13:32953943 AAG>A

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in BRCA2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000059.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

BRCA2NM_000059.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/ASpliceAI predicts possible splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.23, which is above the ENIGMA PP3 splice threshold of 0.2. However, the ENIGMA BRCA2 specification states that PP3 should not be applied when PVS1 is met at any strength, so PP3 is not applied here. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PP3
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.23.
  • ENIGMA states not to apply PP3 if PVS1 is met at any strength.
Sources
BP4 N/AThis variant is not a missense, in-frame, silent, or non-canonical intronic variant eligible for BP4, and SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.23, which is above the BP4 splice threshold of 0.1. BP4 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP4
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is frameshift.
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.23.
  • BP4 requires SpliceAI 0.1 or lower in eligible variant classes.
Sources
BP7 N/AThis variant is a frameshift deletion rather than a silent or eligible intronic variant, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP7
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is frameshift.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.23).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (4 clinical laboratories) and as pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory) and as Pathogenic by Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) (expert panel).

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.23).

Functional

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.