0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

CDKN2A c.183G>A, p.(Glu61=)

NM_000077.5:c.183G>A NP_000068.1:p.(Glu61=) View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About CDKN2A

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PM2Moderate
PM2 · moderate

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and observed at 0/1,596,036 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (AF 0.00000%), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold and supports rarity in population databases.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP7Supporting
BP7 · supporting

This variant is a synonymous substitution, p.(Glu61=), with no predicted effect on the protein sequence, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. These findings support a silent change without evidence of splice disruption.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-classification combination rules were used as the applicable fallback framework because no usable official VCEP/CSPEC or local custom gene-specific final-classification framework was present.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB oncogenicity for this specific variant: Unknown Oncogenic Effect (variant has not been individually curated).

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 3 not met · 14 not assessed · 9 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The CDKN2A c.183G>A (p.Glu61=) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and observed at 0/1,596,036 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (AF 0.00000%), which is below the 0.1% PM2 rarity threshold.

In silico data support a silent variant without splice effect: the protein consequence is p.(Glu61=), SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, and REVEL is 0.083.

Met · 2

PM2 ModerateThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and observed at 0/1,596,036 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (AF 0.00000%), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold and supports rarity in population databases. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PM2
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent
  • gnomAD v4.1: 0/1596036 alleles, AF 0.0, homozygotes 0
Sources
BP7 SupportingThis variant is a synonymous substitution, p.(Glu61=), with no predicted effect on the protein sequence, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. These findings support a silent change without evidence of splice disruption. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP7
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
  • SpliceAI DS_AG 0.0, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, DS_DL 0.0; max delta score 0.00
Still missing
  • RNA studies could further confirm absence of splice effect
Sources
prefetchspliceai ↗

Not met · 3 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM1 Available evidence does not support location in a mutational hotspot or other well-established critical functional domain without benign variation. Cancer Hotspots did not identify a statistically significant hotspot at this residue. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PM1
Evidence considered
  • Cancer Hotspots: no hotspot row found
  • Evidence sentence states the variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot
Sources
BA1 Population frequency does not meet the standalone benign threshold. In gnomAD v4.1 the allele frequency is 0.00000% (0/1,596,036 alleles), which is below the 1% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BA1
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 0.0, 0/1596036 alleles
Sources
BS1 Population frequency does not exceed the strong benign threshold. In gnomAD v4.1 the allele frequency is 0.00000% (0/1,596,036 alleles), which is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS1
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 0.0, 0/1596036 alleles
Sources

Not assessed · 14 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No confirmed de novo data with verified maternity and paternity were identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PS2
Evidence considered
  • No published case data were retrieved
Still missing
  • Proband-specific de novo testing data
Sources
literature_pass
PS3 No well-established functional studies showing a damaging effect on CDKN2A function or splicing were identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PS3
Evidence considered
  • No variant-specific publications were identified
  • No experimental functional evidence was retrieved
Still missing
  • Validated functional or RNA studies specific to c.183G>A
Sources
literature_passspliceai ↗
PS4 No evidence was identified showing this variant is enriched in affected individuals compared with controls. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PS4
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
  • No published case evidence was retrieved
Still missing
  • Case series or case-control data
Sources
clinvar ↗literature_pass
PM3 No data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PM3
Evidence considered
  • No published case data were retrieved
Still missing
  • Phase data and recessive case observations
Sources
literature_pass
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence data were identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PM6
Evidence considered
  • No published case data were retrieved
Still missing
  • De novo occurrence data
Sources
literature_pass
PP1 No segregation data were identified to show that this variant tracks with disease in affected family members. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PP1
Evidence considered
  • No published family data were retrieved
Still missing
  • Family segregation studies
Sources
literature_pass
PP4 No phenotype or family-history information was provided to determine whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for a CDKN2A-related disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PP4
Still missing
  • Detailed phenotype and family history
PP5 No reputable source classification supporting pathogenicity was identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PP5
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
Still missing
  • Independent reputable pathogenic assertion
Sources
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adults at a frequency inconsistent with disease penetrance. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS2
Still missing
  • Observation data in unaffected adults
BS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect were identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS3
Evidence considered
  • No variant-specific publications were identified
Still missing
  • Validated benign functional or RNA studies
Sources
literature_pass
BS4 No family data were identified to show lack of segregation with disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS4
Evidence considered
  • No published family data were retrieved
Still missing
  • Family segregation studies
Sources
literature_pass
BP2 No phase data were identified to show this variant occurs in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP2
Evidence considered
  • No published phase data were retrieved
Still missing
  • Allelic phase data
Sources
literature_pass
BP5 No evidence was identified that the reported phenotype is explained by an alternate molecular cause independent of this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP5
Still missing
  • Comprehensive phenotype and alternative diagnosis data
BP6 No reputable source classification supporting a benign interpretation was identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP6
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
Still missing
  • Independent reputable benign assertion
Sources
Not applicable · 9· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/AThis variant is a synonymous change, p.(Glu61=), and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice-site variants. Although CDKN2A loss of function is an established germline disease mechanism, available evidence does not support applying PVS1 to this specific variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PVS1
Evidence considered
  • CDKN2A loss of function is supported as a germline disease mechanism
  • Generic PVS1 scaffold states this variant does not qualify for default PVS1 null-variant buckets
  • Protein consequence is NP_000068.1:p.(Glu61=)
Sources
PS1 N/AThis variant does not alter the amino acid sequence and therefore does not meet the requirement for the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PS1
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
  • No ClinVar record was identified
Sources
prefetchclinvar ↗
PM4 N/AThis variant is a synonymous substitution and does not change protein length or create an in-frame deletion or insertion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PM4
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
Sources
prefetch
PM5 N/AThis criterion applies to a novel missense change at a residue with a different established pathogenic missense change. This variant is synonymous and does not create a missense substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PM5
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
Sources
prefetch
PP2 N/AThis criterion is intended for missense variants in genes where missense variation is a common disease mechanism. This variant is synonymous. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PP2
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
Sources
prefetch
PP3 N/AThis variant is synonymous and available computational data do not predict a deleterious effect. SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.00, arguing against a splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PP3
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.00
Sources
spliceai ↗prefetch
BP1 N/AThis criterion applies to missense variants. This variant is synonymous. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP1
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
Sources
prefetch
BP3 N/AThis criterion applies to in-frame deletions or insertions in repetitive regions. This variant is a synonymous single-nucleotide substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP3
Evidence considered
  • Variant is a single-nucleotide synonymous substitution
Sources
prefetch
BP4 N/AFor this synonymous variant, splice prediction is more appropriately considered under BP7 rather than BP4. Available computational data do not indicate a splice-disrupting effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP4
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.00
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
Sources
spliceai ↗prefetch

Identifiers

Gene
CDKN2A
Transcript
NM_000077.5
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000077.5:c.183G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000068.1:p.(Glu61=)
GRCh38
chr9:21971176 C>T
GRCh37
chr9:21971175 C>T

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in CDKN2A, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000077.5. Select a row to find it on the plot.

CDKN2ANM_000077.5
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 0 / 1,596,036 alleles AF 0 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 0 · 0 / 1,596,036 alleles · 0 hom
No alternate alleles recorded in the displayed ancestry groups.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/1596036 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/74908 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP7 SupportingThis variant is a synonymous substitution, p.(Glu61=), with no predicted effect on the protein sequence, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. These findings support a silent change without evidence of splice disruption. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP7
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
  • SpliceAI DS_AG 0.0, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, DS_DL 0.0; max delta score 0.00
Still missing
  • RNA studies could further confirm absence of splice effect
Sources
prefetchspliceai ↗
PP3 N/AThis variant is synonymous and available computational data do not predict a deleterious effect. SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.00, arguing against a splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PP3
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.00
Sources
spliceai ↗prefetch
BP4 N/AFor this synonymous variant, splice prediction is more appropriately considered under BP7 rather than BP4. Available computational data do not indicate a splice-disrupting effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP4
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.00
  • Protein consequence is p.(Glu61=)
Sources
spliceai ↗prefetch

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/1596036 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0; MAF= 0.00000%, 0/74908 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB oncogenicity for this specific variant: Unknown Oncogenic Effect (variant has not been individually curated).

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.