0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MSH6 c.3926C>A, p.(Pro1309Gln)

NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln) Missense · exon 9 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MSH6

MSH6 encodes a protein in the DNA mismatch repair system, which fixes errors made during DNA replication. Partnering with MSH2, it forms a complex that recognizes and helps correct mismatched DNA bases, keeping the genetic code stable. Inherited mutations in MSH6 cause Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), raising the risk of colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, and other cancers, while mutations in both copies lead to constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. Because faulty mismatch repair drives tumor development and produces microsatellite instability, MSH6 acts as a tumor suppressor, and cancers with such repair defects often respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen MSH6 VCEP v2.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met (Supporting): absent from gnomAD v4.1 population databases, meeting the VCEP's extreme rarity threshold (<1 in 50,000 alleles).

PP3Moderate
PP3 · moderate

Met (Moderate): HCI prior probability of pathogenicity 0.823 exceeds the >0.81 PP3_Moderate threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

Only PM2 (Supporting) and PP3 (Moderate) were met; together they satisfy no Pathogenic or Benign combination rule, so the overall classification is VUS.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.936 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.936. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
1 reported laboratory submissions

1 Uncertain significance. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, single submitter.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MSH6, a DNA mismatch repair protein, is frequently mutated in colorectal, small bowel, and endometrial cancers.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen MSH6 VCEP v2.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 3 not met · 11 not assessed · 12 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

Variant NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A / NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln) is a missense substitution in MSH6.

The InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis (MMR) VCEP specification (cspec v2.0) is the governing gene-specific framework and was consulted first per protocol.

PVS1 is not applicable: the VCEP framework restricts PVS1 to truncating/frameshift, initiation-codon, tandem-duplication, or canonical splice-site categories, none of which this missense variant meets; SpliceAI additionally shows no splice impact (max delta 0.00).

PM4 and BP3 are both explicitly designated 'Not Applicable' for MSH6 in the VCEP cspec v2.0, and are also mechanistically inapplicable since the variant causes no protein length change and involves no repetitive region.

MSH6 is governed by the ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Expert Panel specification v2.0 (cspec), which explicitly sets PM1, PP2, and BP1 to Not Applicable for this gene.

PS1 and PM5 both remain codon/residue-comparator-dependent criteria whose automated same-residue/same-change harvest (pm5_candidates.json) returned zero comparator candidates but failed mid-query with an HTTP 429 rate-limit error, so neither criterion could be confidently ruled met or not_met; both are returned as not_assessed pending a successful re-query.

Only PS2, PM6, PP1, and BS4 were adjudicated.

The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP Version 2.0 framework was used; generic ACMG criteria were not substituted where the VCEP specification applied.

No case-specific de novo, parental-testing, segregation, or non-segregation evidence was available in the consolidated case-evidence bundle.

PS3 and BS3 both require variant-specific calibrated functional assay evidence (or monoallelic expression/mRNA data) under the InSiGHT MMR VCEP specification for MSH6. No such variant-specific data for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A was located in the case bundle (evidence.json, literature_pass.json, vcep_materials.json, prefetch.json), only generic VCEP methodology/calibration reference documents. Both criteria are therefore not_assessed pending a functional assay result for this variant.

The governing framework is the InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis MSH6 VCEP specification, version 2.0.

No exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic or Benign/Likely benign classification is present.

No patient-level tumor phenotype results are present to assess PP4 or BP5.

Governing framework: ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Guidelines for MSH6, Version 2.0 (cspec).

Variant NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A / NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln) is a missense substitution; the VCEP routes missense PP3/BP4 evidence through its gene-specific HCI-PRIORS lookup rather than generic multi-tool in silico consensus.

HCI prior probability = 0.823 exceeds the VCEP's >0.81 threshold, meeting PP3 at Moderate strength; this is the VCEP's own pre-assigned gene-specific code and is applied directly per instructions.

BP4 is not met because the HCI prior (0.823) is far from the <0.11 benign threshold; the alternate SpliceAI-based BP4 clause is restricted to intronic/synonymous variants and does not apply to this missense substitution.

BP7 is not applicable because the variant is missense, not synonymous or intronic, per both generic ACMG/AMP and the VCEP's own variant-type gate for BP7.

REVEL (0.936) and BayesDel (0.508775) scores were retrieved for this variant but are not used to adjudicate PP3/BP4 here because the governing MSH6 VCEP CSpec designates the HCI-PRIORS lookup as the specification for missense PP3/BP4, superseding generic REVEL/BayesDel thresholds; additionally, BayesDel lacks a verified published calibration threshold for this pipeline and REVEL is not cited in the VCEP's own PP3/BP4 rule text for MSH6.

Population evidence supports PM2 at Supporting strength under the MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP because the variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1.

BA1 and BS1 are not met because the variant does not reach either benign frequency threshold.

BS2 is not assessed because the case bundle lacks the required individual-level co-occurrence, phase, age, and CMMRD information.

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingMet (Supporting): absent from gnomAD v4.1 population databases, meeting the VCEP's extreme rarity threshold (<1 in 50,000 alleles). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP permits PM2 at Supporting strength when the allele frequency is absent or extremely rare (<0.00002, <1 in 50,000 alleles) in gnomAD v4. NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (p.Pro1309Gln) is absent from gnomAD v4.1, satisfying the specified PM2 Supporting rule.

Rule
Absent/extremely rare allele frequency <0.00002 (<1 in 50,000 alleles) in gnomAD v4 dataset
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP PM2 rule is absent/extremely rare allele frequency <0.00002 (<1 in 50,000 alleles) in the gnomAD v4 dataset.
  • NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (MSH6 p.Pro1309Gln) was reported absent from gnomAD v4.1, meeting the VCEP's absent/extremely rare population-frequency requirement.
Sources
PP3 ModerateMet (Moderate): HCI prior probability of pathogenicity 0.823 exceeds the >0.81 PP3_Moderate threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (p.Pro1309Gln) is a missense variant. Per the ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis VCEP specification v2.0 for MSH6, PP3 is applied via the gene-specific HCI-PRIORS lookup: HCI prior probability of pathogenicity >0.81 = PP3_Moderate; >0.68 and <=0.81 = PP3_Supporting. The local HCI-PRIORS-MSH6 lookup for this exact coding substitution (c.3926C>A / p.P1309Q, dbid MSH6_08617) returns a prior probability of 0.823, which exceeds the 0.81 threshold, meeting PP3 at Moderate strength per the VCEP's own pre-assigned rule. SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta = 0.00) for this variant, but the SpliceAI-based PP3 clause in this VCEP's rule only applies to non-canonical splice nucleotide variants, not to standard missense substitutions, so it is not invoked here; the missense (HCI-prior) path governs.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP CSpec v2.0 PP3: Missense variant with HCI prior probability for pathogenicity >0.81 = PP3_Moderate.
Evidence considered
  • VCEP PP3 rule (MSH6 InSiGHT CSpec v2.0): 'Missense variant with HCI prior probability for pathogenicity >0.81 as per https://hci-priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS' assigns PP3 at Moderate strength.
  • HCI-PRIORS-MSH6 local lookup table entry for c.3926C>A (p.P1309Q, dbid MSH6_08617): hci_prior_probability = 0.823, which is >0.81, meeting the VCEP's PP3_Moderate threshold.
  • SpliceAI lookup for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A shows max delta score = 0.00 (no significant predicted splice impact); this variant is a missense substitution, not a non-canonical splice nucleotide variant, so the SpliceAI-based PP3 clause of the VCEP rule does not apply and only the HCI-prior missense path is used.
Sources
cspec ↗hci_prior

Not met · 3 · evaluated, threshold not reached

BA1 Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, below the 0.22% BA1 frequency threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP specifies BA1 when the gnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency is at least 0.0022 (0.22%) and the variant is not a founder pathogenic variant. The variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, so the BA1 frequency threshold is not met.

Rule
GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.0022 (0.22%) and variant is excluded as founder pathogenic variant.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP BA1 rule is gnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥0.0022 (0.22%), with exclusion of founder pathogenic variants.
  • NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (MSH6 p.Pro1309Gln) was reported absent from gnomAD v4.1; therefore its observed frequency is below the BA1 threshold rather than at or above it.
Sources
BS1 Not met: absent from gnomAD v4.1, below the 0.022% BS1 frequency threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP specifies BS1 Strong when the gnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency is at least 0.00022 and below 0.0022 (0.022–0.22%) and the variant is not a founder pathogenic variant. The variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, so this frequency interval is not met.

Rule
GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.00022 and < 0.0022 (0.022-0.22%) and variant is excluded as founder pathogenic variant.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP BS1 rule is gnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥0.00022 and <0.0022 (0.022–0.22%), with exclusion of founder pathogenic variants.
  • NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (MSH6 p.Pro1309Gln) was reported absent from gnomAD v4.1; no allele frequency in the BS1 interval was observed.
Sources
BP4 Not met: HCI prior probability 0.823 is far above the 0.11 BP4 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP-specific BP4 rule requires HCI prior probability <0.11 for missense variants (or SpliceAI delta <=0.1 for intronic/synonymous variants). This variant is missense with an HCI prior probability of 0.823, far above the 0.11 BP4 threshold, so BP4 does not apply via the missense path. The SpliceAI intronic/synonymous clause is not applicable to this missense substitution.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP CSpec v2.0 BP4: Missense variant with HCI prior probability <0.11.
Evidence considered
  • VCEP BP4 rule (MSH6 InSiGHT CSpec v2.0): 'Missense variant with HCI-prior probability of pathogenicity <0.11 ... OR for intronic and synonymous variants: SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact with delta score <=0.1 as per Walker et al 2023.'
  • HCI-PRIORS-MSH6 lookup for c.3926C>A gives hci_prior_probability = 0.823, well above the 0.11 BP4 threshold, so the missense BP4 path is not met.
  • This variant is missense, not intronic or synonymous, so the SpliceAI-based BP4 clause of the VCEP rule is not applicable.
Sources
cspec ↗hci_prior

Not assessed · 11 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no previously classified pathogenic variant encoding the same p.Pro1309Gln change via an alternate nucleotide was available for comparison. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

MSH6 VCEP (ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary CRC/Polyposis EP, v2.0) defines PS1 as a predicted missense substitution encoding the same amino acid change (p.Pro1309Gln) via a different nucleotide change previously established by this VCEP as Pathogenic (Strong) or Likely Pathogenic with normal RNA result plus PM2_supporting (Moderate). No comparator variant encoding the identical p.(Pro1309Gln) change via an alternate codon was identified in the case bundle; the PM5/PS1 comparator harvest for this residue returned zero same-residue candidates and failed with an HTTP 429 rate-limit error during ClinVar querying, so absence of a same-amino-acid comparator cannot be confirmed with confidence.

Rule
PS1_Strong: same amino acid change via alternate nucleotide, VCEP-classified Pathogenic (not splice). PS1_Moderate: same amino acid change via alternate nucleotide as VCEP Likely Pathogenic missense with normal RNA and PM2_supporting met.
Evidence considered
  • cspec v2.0 PS1 rule: same amino acid change via different nucleotide change, previously VCEP-classified Pathogenic (Strong) or Likely Pathogenic with normal RNA + PM2_supporting (Moderate).
  • pm5_candidates.json same-residue comparator harvest for P1309 found 0 same-residue candidates out of 7 total candidates seen, and the harvest itself failed softly with error 'HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests', meaning the search was incomplete rather than a confirmed negative.
Still missing
  • Same-residue/same-amino-acid comparator search (pm5_candidates.json) failed with HTTP 429 (Too Many Requests) before completing; a clean re-query of ClinVar for other codon changes producing p.Pro1309Gln classified Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic by this VCEP is needed to confirm PS1 does not apply.
Sources
cspec ↗pm5_candidates
PS2 Not assessed: no de novo observation with parental confirmation was documented for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP framework makes PS2 applicable and requires documented de novo status with maternity/paternity confirmation plus the specified Lynch-spectrum tumor context. The case-evidence bundle contains no proband-level de novo observation, parental testing, maternity/paternity confirmation, or qualifying tumor evidence for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A; therefore PS2 cannot be assigned.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP PS2: >=4 de novo points = Very Strong; 2-3.5 points = Strong; 1-1.5 points = Moderate; 0.5 points = Supporting.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP PS2 rule requires 2 de novo points for a proband with confirmed maternity and paternity and an MMR-deficient Lynch-spectrum tumor, 1 point for confirmed maternity and paternity without tumor data, or 0.5 points for assumed de novo status with unconfirmed maternity and/or paternity and a Lynch-spectrum tumor.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no case-specific proband, parental testing, de novo, or tumor findings for this criterion.
Still missing
  • Proband-level documentation that the variant is de novo.
  • Maternity and paternity testing results.
  • Lynch-spectrum tumor diagnosis and, if applicable, MSI/IHC/methylation results.
  • Number of eligible probands and de novo points, if any.
Sources
PS3 Not assessed: no functional assay results for this variant (e.g., cell-based mismatch-repair activity) were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The InSiGHT MMR VCEP specification (cspec) defines PS3 using calibrated functional-assay odds of pathogenicity (Strong >18.7, Moderate >4.3-18.7, Supporting >2.08-4.3), MMR function-defect-per-flowchart, or monoallelic expression loss (<10% WT). No variant-specific functional assay data (cell-based MMR activity/complementation assay, splicing/mRNA assay, or monoallelic expression study) for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (p.Pro1309Gln) is present anywhere in the case bundle. The VCEP-supplied Functional-assay-flowchart.pdf and Functional-assay-SVI-documentation-MMR.xlsx are generic calibration/methodology references only, containing no variant-specific results, and the sole literature hit (PMID:28492532, Sherloc) is tagged case_observation/PS4 in this case's literature triage, not a functional assay report, and was not retrieved as containing assay data for this variant. No in silico predictor substitutes for PS3 under this VCEP (PS3 requires wet-lab functional assay evidence, distinct from PP3's HCI-prior pathway). Cannot assess PS3 without a published or laboratory functional assay result for this specific variant.

Evidence considered
  • cspec PS3 rule (InSiGHT MMR VCEP v2.0): Strong >18.7, Moderate >4.3-18.7 (or MMR function defect per flowchart, or monoallelic <10% WT expression), Supporting >2.08-4.3 functional odds for pathogenicity
  • Case bundle contains only generic VCEP reference materials (Functional-assay-flowchart.pdf, Functional-assay-SVI-documentation-MMR.xlsx) with no variant-specific assay results extracted for this variant
  • PMID:28492532 (Sherloc) is triaged in this case's literature_packet under theme case_observation with candidate_criteria BAS/PS4, not functional assay data; not opened for PS3 purposes as it was not flagged as containing functional evidence for this variant
Still missing
  • No calibrated MMR functional assay (e.g. cell-based complementation/MMR activity assay) result reported for c.3926C>A / p.Pro1309Gln
  • No mRNA/splicing or monoallelic expression assay data for this variant
  • No functional-odds-for-pathogenicity value available to apply the VCEP PS3 strength tiers
PM3 Not assessed: no second pathogenic MSH6 variant or co-occurrence observation was available to evaluate. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP framework makes PM3 applicable for co-occurrence with a known pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in the same gene in a patient with clinical features consistent with CMMRD. The case evidence bundle provides no affected-proband observation, second pathogenic or likely pathogenic MSH6 variant, phase determination, or phase-unknown co-occurrence observation. Therefore no PM3 points can be assigned and the criterion cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
Co-occurrence with a known pathogenic/likely pathogenic sequence variant in the same gene in a patient with clinical features consistent with CMMRD; pathogenic/likely pathogenic in trans = 1.0 point, phase unknown = 0.5 points; sum all cases to determine PM3 strength.
Evidence considered
  • The governing MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP rule assigns 1.0 PM3 point for a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in trans and 0.5 points when phase is unknown, with PM3 strength thresholds of supporting at 0.5 points, moderate at 1-1.5 points, strong at 2-3.5 points, and very strong at 4 or more points.
  • The case bundle contains no report of a second MSH6 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, affected-proband CMMRD features, or phase information for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (p.Pro1309Gln).
Still missing
  • Documented clinical features consistent with CMMRD in the affected proband
  • A second known pathogenic or likely pathogenic MSH6 sequence variant in the same proband
  • Parental or offspring testing establishing the variants are in trans, or an explicitly documented phase-unknown co-occurrence
  • Evidence that the second variant is pathogenic or likely pathogenic independent of its source classification
Sources
PM5 Not assessed: no previously classified pathogenic variant at residue 1309 could be confirmed for the same-residue comparison. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

MSH6 VCEP PM5 requires a different missense change at the same residue (P1309) previously classified Pathogenic (PM5_Moderate) or Likely Pathogenic (PM5_Supporting) on the protein level (not aberrant splicing), and additionally requires that PP3 be met (supporting or greater) for the current variant before PM5 can be applied. The dedicated same-residue comparator harvest (pm5_candidates.json) returned 0 same-residue candidates among 7 total candidates seen, but the underlying ClinVar query failed with an HTTP 429 rate-limit error, so this cannot be treated as a confirmed absence of comparator variants at codon 1309.

Rule
PM5_Moderate: different missense at same residue, VCEP Pathogenic on protein level, PP3 met. PM5_Supporting: different missense at same residue, VCEP Likely Pathogenic on protein level, PP3 met.
Evidence considered
  • cspec v2.0 PM5 rule: different missense change at same residue previously VCEP-classified Pathogenic (Moderate) or Likely Pathogenic (Supporting) on protein level, not aberrant splicing; PM5 usage is gated on PP3 being met for the variant under review.
  • pm5_candidates.json: residue P1309 (reference aa Pro, position 1309), same_residue_candidates = 0 of 7 total candidates seen, but harvest recorded error 'HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests', flagged by the tool itself as a soft failure requiring manual review rather than automatic PM5 exclusion.
Still missing
  • Same-residue comparator search failed with HTTP 429 before completion; needs a successful re-query of ClinVar/literature for other missense substitutions at P1309 with VCEP Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic classification.
  • Even if a comparator surfaces, VCEP rule requires PP3 to be met (supporting) for c.3926C>A before PM5 can be applied; that dependency should be checked once PP3 status from another group is finalized.
Sources
cspec ↗pm5_candidates
PP1 Not assessed: no family segregation data or likelihood ratio was available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP framework makes PP1 applicable and requires a combined segregation Bayes likelihood ratio. The case-evidence bundle contains no affected-relative genotypes, pedigree, meioses, segregation counts, or calculated Bayes likelihood ratio for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A; therefore PP1 cannot be assigned at any strength.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP PP1: combined segregation Bayes likelihood ratio >18.7 in >=2 families = Strong; >4.3 and <=18.7 = Moderate; >2.08 and <=4.3 = Supporting.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP PP1 rule uses the combined segregation Bayes likelihood ratio: >18.7 in at least 2 families for Strong, >4.3 and <=18.7 for Moderate, and >2.08 and <=4.3 for Supporting.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no case-specific pedigree, relative testing, meiosis, segregation, or Bayes likelihood ratio data for this variant.
Still missing
  • Pedigree with phenotype status and relationship for informative relatives.
  • Genotypes for the variant in affected and unaffected relatives.
  • Informative meioses and penetrance/phenotype assumptions as needed for analysis.
  • Combined segregation Bayes likelihood ratio.
Sources
PP4 Not assessed: no tumor microsatellite-instability or immunohistochemistry results were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP4 is applicable under the MSH6 VCEP framework, but the case bundle provides no patient-level tumor MSI or MMR immunohistochemistry results. Therefore, the required phenotype-specific evidence cannot be assessed.

Rule
Supporting: 1 CRC/endometrial MSI-H tumor using a standard panel of 5-10 markers or tumor genome and/or loss of MMR protein expression consistent with the variant location. Moderate: 2 independent qualifying tumors. Strong: at least 3 independent qualifying tumors in at least 2 families.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP PP4 rule requires one or more qualifying CRC/endometrial MSI-H tumors using a standard MSI panel or tumor genome and/or MMR protein loss consistent with the variant location; the bundle contains no such patient-level tumor results.
  • No publication was retained for this group because the only linked full text does not mention the exact variant NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A or p.Pro1309Gln.
Still missing
  • Patient-level CRC or endometrial tumor MSI status using a qualifying marker panel or tumor genome is not provided.
  • Patient-level MMR protein immunohistochemistry results, including whether MSH6 loss is consistent with the variant location, are not provided.
  • The number of independent qualifying tumors and families is not provided.
Sources
BS2 Not assessed: no qualifying in-trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic variant was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MSH6 VCEP BS2 rule requires documented in-trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic sequence variant in the same gene in a patient with colorectal cancer after age 45, or another Lynch syndrome cancer above its median age of onset, without clinical manifestations of CMMRD; phase must be confirmed through parental or offspring testing. The case bundle contains no qualifying individual-level co-occurrence, phase, age, or CMMRD assessment.

Rule
Co-occurrence in trans with a known pathogenic sequence variant in the same gene in a patient with colorectal cancer after age 45 (or other LS cancer above the median age of onset for that cancer in LS), and who has no previous or current evidence of clinical manifestations of CMMRD; confirmation of phase requires testing of parents or offspring.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP BS2 rule requires in-trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic variant in the same gene, qualifying Lynch syndrome cancer age criteria, no CMMRD manifestations, and phase confirmation by parents or offspring.
  • The available case evidence reports population absence and does not provide a qualifying patient-level co-occurrence or phase analysis.
Still missing
  • No documented patient-level in-trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic MSH6 variant.
  • No confirmed phase from parental or offspring testing.
  • No qualifying cancer type and age-of-onset documentation.
  • No assessment excluding prior or current clinical manifestations of CMMRD.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no functional assay evidence of proficient mismatch-repair function was available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The InSiGHT MMR VCEP specification (cspec) defines BS3 using calibrated functional-assay odds of pathogenicity (Strong <=0.05, Supporting >0.05-0.48) or variant-specific proficient function in protein/mRNA-based assays per the MMR functional assay flowchart (for missense variants; the synonymous/intronic-NMD pathway does not apply, as this is a missense substitution). No variant-specific functional assay data of any kind for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (p.Pro1309Gln) is present in the case bundle. Without a functional odds value or a documented proficient-function assay result for this exact variant, BS3 cannot be evaluated.

Evidence considered
  • cspec BS3 rule (InSiGHT MMR VCEP v2.0): Strong functional odds for pathogenicity <=0.05, Supporting >0.05-0.48, or variant-specific proficient function in protein/mRNA-based assays per MMR functional assay flowchart
  • Case bundle contains only generic VCEP reference materials, with no variant-specific functional assay result located for this variant
Still missing
  • No calibrated functional assay result (functional odds <=0.48) demonstrating proficient MMR function for c.3926C>A / p.Pro1309Gln
  • No protein- or mRNA-based lab assay result per the MMR functional assay flowchart for this variant
BS4 Not assessed: no family data demonstrating lack of segregation was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP framework makes BS4 applicable and requires documented lack of co-segregation with a combined Bayes likelihood ratio. The case-evidence bundle contains no non-segregation observations, pedigree, relative genotypes, informative meioses, or calculated Bayes likelihood ratio for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A; therefore BS4 cannot be assigned.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP BS4: combined non-segregation Bayes likelihood ratio <0.05 = Strong; >0.05 and <=0.48 = Supporting.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP BS4 rule uses the combined non-segregation Bayes likelihood ratio: <0.05 for Strong and >0.05 and <=0.48 for Supporting, with cautions concerning phenocopies and alternative pathogenic variants.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no case-specific non-segregation, pedigree, relative testing, meiosis, or Bayes likelihood ratio data for this variant.
Still missing
  • Pedigree with phenotype status and relationship for informative relatives.
  • Variant genotypes in affected and unaffected relatives.
  • Documented non-segregation observations and assessment of phenocopy or alternative-variant explanations.
  • Combined non-segregation Bayes likelihood ratio.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no tumor data establishing an alternate molecular cause (e.g., BRAF V600E or MLH1 methylation) was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP5 is applicable under the MSH6 VCEP framework, but the case bundle contains no patient-level tumor data establishing an alternate molecular basis, such as MSS/no MMR protein loss, inconsistent MMR protein loss, BRAF V600E, or MLH1 methylation.

Rule
Supporting: 2 or 3 qualifying tumors with MSS and/or no MMR protein loss and/or inconsistent MMR protein loss, or 1 qualifying BRAF V600E/MLH1 methylation result. Strong: at least 4 qualifying tumors or at least 2 qualifying BRAF V600E/MLH1 methylation results.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP BP5 rule requires 2-3 qualifying tumors for supporting strength or at least 4 qualifying tumors for strong strength, with specified MSS/IHC-inconsistent findings, or qualifying BRAF V600E/MLH1 methylation evidence; none is documented in the case bundle.
  • The absence of the variant from COSMIC is not evidence of an alternate molecular basis for this patient's disease and was not used for BP5.
Still missing
  • Patient-level tumor MSI/MSS results and MMR protein expression results are not provided.
  • Patient-level BRAF V600E or MLH1 methylation results, if relevant, are not provided.
  • The number of qualifying tumors is not provided.
Sources
Not applicable · 12· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense change (p.Pro1309Gln), not a nonsense, frameshift, or splice-site variant that would disrupt protein function. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A is a missense substitution (NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln)), not a nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, initiation-codon, or whole/multi-exon deletion/duplication variant. The InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis (MMR) VCEP specification (cspec v2.0) restricts PVS1 to: nonsense/frameshift variants introducing a PTC at or before codon 1341 (Very Strong) or codons 1342-1360 (Moderate); initiation codon variants; tandem exon duplications causing frameshift; last-exon-base G>non-G variants with abnormal donor context; IVS+/-1 or IVS+/-2 splice variants predicted to disrupt reading frame and undergo NMD or to preserve reading frame in a critical domain; or confirmed mRNA-assay splicing aberrations. This missense substitution meets none of these categories, and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta = 0.00), so no splicing-mediated LoF mechanism is engaged either. PVS1 is therefore not applicable to this variant class under the governing VCEP framework.

Rule
InSiGHT MMR VCEP cspec v2.0 PVS1: applies only to nonsense/frameshift PTC, initiation codon, tandem-duplication frameshift, canonical splice-site disruption, or confirmed splicing aberration by mRNA assay -- missense substitutions are categorically outside scope.
Evidence considered
  • Case summary normalization confirms the variant is a single-nucleotide missense substitution: NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A / NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln), not a truncating or splice-altering change.
  • InSiGHT MMR VCEP cspec v2.0 PVS1 rules (case_summary.json compact_evidence.cspec) restrict PVS1_Very Strong/Strong/Moderate to nonsense/frameshift PTC, initiation codon, tandem duplication frameshift, last-exon-base G>non-G, canonical splice-site (IVS+/-1, +/-2) disruption, or confirmed mRNA-assay splicing aberration -- none of which apply to a missense change.
  • SpliceAI evidence_sentence: 'SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00)', ruling out a splice-mediated LoF mechanism that could otherwise trigger PVS1 consideration.
Sources
PS4 VCEPNot applicable: the MSH6 framework does not use PS4, since tumor findings are captured through PP4 instead. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP specification designates PS4 as not applicable and states that PS4 is not used for MMR variant classification by proband counting because tumor IHC data are used for classification through PP4.

VCEP rule
Not applicable under the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP specification; PS4 is not used for MMR variant classification by proband counting.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP specification lists PS4 as not applicable and explicitly states that PS4 has not been utilized for MMR variant classification using proband counting due to the availability of tumor IHC data for PP4.
  • The case bundle contains no applicable case-control enrichment analysis, and the only linked publication does not mention NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A or p.Pro1309Gln.
Sources
PM1 VCEPNot applicable: the MSH6 VCEP provides no mutational-hotspot PM1 rule for this gene. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MSH6 VCEP specification (ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary CRC/Polyposis EP, cspec v2.0) explicitly marks PM1 as 'Not Applicable' for this gene, so no mutational hotspot/functional domain PM1 rule is provided or usable.

VCEP rule
PM1 not applicable per MSH6 VCEP specification.
Evidence considered
  • cspec v2.0 lists PM1 with applicability = 'Not Applicable' for MSH6.
Sources
PM4 VCEPNot applicable: this missense change does not alter protein length, and the framework provides no PM4 rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The InSiGHT MMR VCEP specification (cspec v2.0) explicitly marks PM4 as 'Not Applicable' for MSH6 (no PM4 rule set is provided in the framework). PM4 (protein length change from in-frame indel or stop-loss) is also not mechanistically relevant here regardless: c.3926C>A is a single-nucleotide missense substitution (p.Pro1309Gln) that does not alter protein length -- it is not an in-frame insertion/deletion and does not affect a stop codon. PM4 is therefore not applicable both by explicit VCEP designation and by variant type.

VCEP rule
InSiGHT MMR VCEP cspec v2.0: PM4 explicitly marked Not Applicable for MSH6.
Evidence considered
  • InSiGHT MMR VCEP cspec v2.0 (case_summary.json compact_evidence.cspec) lists PM4 with 'applicability': 'Not Applicable' for MSH6, overriding any generic ACMG PM4 use.
  • Variant is a missense substitution (p.Pro1309Gln) causing no change in protein length, consistent with PM4 being mechanistically inapplicable independent of the VCEP override.
Sources
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the MSH6 VCEP framework does not use PM6. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP framework explicitly marks PM6 as not applicable. No generic PM6 assessment is used because an applicable gene-specific specification takes precedence.

VCEP rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP PM6: Not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP framework lists PM6 as Not applicable, despite describing assumed de novo observations in its instructions.
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot applicable: the MSH6 VCEP does not use PP2, superseding the generic missense-constraint rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MSH6 VCEP specification (cspec v2.0) explicitly marks PP2 as 'Not Applicable' for this gene, superseding the generic ACMG PP2 missense-constraint rule.

VCEP rule
PP2 not applicable per MSH6 VCEP specification.
Evidence considered
  • cspec v2.0 lists PP2 with applicability = 'Not Applicable' for MSH6.
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the framework does not use PP5, and the ClinVar record lacks an expert-panel submission. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP specification designates PP5 as not applicable. In addition, the ClinVar record is an uncertain-significance single-submitter laboratory assertion with no expert-panel submission, so it cannot trigger PP5 under the requested exact-variant expert-panel rule.

VCEP rule
Not applicable under the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP specification; under the requested supplemental gate, apply only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP specification lists PP5 as not applicable and states that it is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen SVI VCEP Review Committee.
  • ClinVar reports NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A as uncertain significance with criteria provided by a single submitter; the case bundle reports zero expert-panel submissions.
  • PP5 would require an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic, which is absent here.
Sources
BP1 VCEPNot applicable: the MSH6 VCEP does not use BP1, superseding the generic missense-mechanism rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MSH6 VCEP specification (cspec v2.0) explicitly marks BP1 as 'Not Applicable' for this gene, superseding the generic ACMG BP1 missense-gene-mechanism rule.

VCEP rule
BP1 not applicable per MSH6 VCEP specification.
Evidence considered
  • cspec v2.0 lists BP1 with applicability = 'Not Applicable' for MSH6.
Sources
BP2 VCEPNot applicable: the MSH6 VCEP framework does not use BP2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP framework explicitly designates BP2 as not applicable. No BP2 assessment is therefore made.

VCEP rule
Not applicable for this VCEP.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP specification explicitly lists BP2 as not applicable.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: this is a missense change, not an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and the framework provides no BP3 rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The InSiGHT MMR VCEP specification (cspec v2.0) explicitly marks BP3 as 'Not Applicable' for MSH6 (no BP3 rule set is provided in the framework). BP3 (in-frame indel in a repetitive region with no known function) is also not mechanistically relevant here: c.3926C>A is a missense substitution, not an in-frame insertion/deletion, and there is no repeat-region context to evaluate. BP3 is therefore not applicable both by explicit VCEP designation and by variant type.

VCEP rule
InSiGHT MMR VCEP cspec v2.0: BP3 explicitly marked Not Applicable for MSH6.
Evidence considered
  • InSiGHT MMR VCEP cspec v2.0 (case_summary.json compact_evidence.cspec) lists BP3 with 'applicability': 'Not Applicable' for MSH6, overriding any generic ACMG BP3 use.
  • Variant is a missense substitution, not an in-frame indel in a repetitive/non-functional region, so BP3's underlying mechanism does not apply regardless of the VCEP override.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the framework does not use BP6, and the ClinVar record lacks an expert-panel submission. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP specification designates BP6 as not applicable. The ClinVar record is an uncertain-significance single-submitter laboratory assertion with no expert-panel submission, so it cannot trigger BP6 under the requested exact-variant expert-panel rule.

VCEP rule
Not applicable under the InSiGHT MSH6 VCEP specification; under the requested supplemental gate, apply only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification.
Evidence considered
  • The MSH6 VCEP specification lists BP6 as not applicable and states that it is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen SVI VCEP Review Committee.
  • ClinVar reports NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A as uncertain significance with criteria provided by a single submitter; the case bundle reports zero expert-panel submissions.
  • BP6 would require an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification, which is absent here.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies only to synonymous or deep intronic variants, and this is a missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7, per both the generic ACMG/AMP framework and the MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP specification, applies only to synonymous (silent) or deep intronic variants with no predicted splicing impact. NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A encodes p.Pro1309Gln, a missense (amino acid-changing) substitution, so BP7 is not applicable to this variant regardless of the SpliceAI null-impact result.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP CSpec v2.0 BP7: Synonymous or intronic variant only.
Evidence considered
  • VCEP BP7 rule (MSH6 InSiGHT CSpec v2.0): 'A synonymous (silent) or intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7 (5' / 3' exonic). Variants may satisfy both BP7 and BP4.' This variant's protein consequence is NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln), a missense change, so it does not meet the synonymous/intronic variant-type gate for BP7.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
MSH6
Transcript
NM_000179.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln)
GRCh38
chr2:47806576 C>A
GRCh37
chr2:48033715 C>A
Location and type
Exon 9 · missense
ClinVar
1720893

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MSH6, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000179.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MSH6NM_000179.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.005
Pangolin splice gain
0.020

Other predictors

REVEL
0.936
BayesDel
0.509

How the predictions were used

PP3 ModerateMet (Moderate): HCI prior probability of pathogenicity 0.823 exceeds the >0.81 PP3_Moderate threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A (p.Pro1309Gln) is a missense variant. Per the ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis VCEP specification v2.0 for MSH6, PP3 is applied via the gene-specific HCI-PRIORS lookup: HCI prior probability of pathogenicity >0.81 = PP3_Moderate; >0.68 and <=0.81 = PP3_Supporting. The local HCI-PRIORS-MSH6 lookup for this exact coding substitution (c.3926C>A / p.P1309Q, dbid MSH6_08617) returns a prior probability of 0.823, which exceeds the 0.81 threshold, meeting PP3 at Moderate strength per the VCEP's own pre-assigned rule. SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta = 0.00) for this variant, but the SpliceAI-based PP3 clause in this VCEP's rule only applies to non-canonical splice nucleotide variants, not to standard missense substitutions, so it is not invoked here; the missense (HCI-prior) path governs.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP CSpec v2.0 PP3: Missense variant with HCI prior probability for pathogenicity >0.81 = PP3_Moderate.
Evidence considered
  • VCEP PP3 rule (MSH6 InSiGHT CSpec v2.0): 'Missense variant with HCI prior probability for pathogenicity >0.81 as per https://hci-priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS' assigns PP3 at Moderate strength.
  • HCI-PRIORS-MSH6 local lookup table entry for c.3926C>A (p.P1309Q, dbid MSH6_08617): hci_prior_probability = 0.823, which is >0.81, meeting the VCEP's PP3_Moderate threshold.
  • SpliceAI lookup for NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A shows max delta score = 0.00 (no significant predicted splice impact); this variant is a missense substitution, not a non-canonical splice nucleotide variant, so the SpliceAI-based PP3 clause of the VCEP rule does not apply and only the HCI-prior missense path is used.
Sources
cspec ↗hci_prior
BP4 Not met: HCI prior probability 0.823 is far above the 0.11 BP4 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP-specific BP4 rule requires HCI prior probability <0.11 for missense variants (or SpliceAI delta <=0.1 for intronic/synonymous variants). This variant is missense with an HCI prior probability of 0.823, far above the 0.11 BP4 threshold, so BP4 does not apply via the missense path. The SpliceAI intronic/synonymous clause is not applicable to this missense substitution.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP CSpec v2.0 BP4: Missense variant with HCI prior probability <0.11.
Evidence considered
  • VCEP BP4 rule (MSH6 InSiGHT CSpec v2.0): 'Missense variant with HCI-prior probability of pathogenicity <0.11 ... OR for intronic and synonymous variants: SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact with delta score <=0.1 as per Walker et al 2023.'
  • HCI-PRIORS-MSH6 lookup for c.3926C>A gives hci_prior_probability = 0.823, well above the 0.11 BP4 threshold, so the missense BP4 path is not met.
  • This variant is missense, not intronic or synonymous, so the SpliceAI-based BP4 clause of the VCEP rule is not applicable.
Sources
cspec ↗hci_prior
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies only to synonymous or deep intronic variants, and this is a missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7, per both the generic ACMG/AMP framework and the MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP specification, applies only to synonymous (silent) or deep intronic variants with no predicted splicing impact. NM_000179.2:c.3926C>A encodes p.Pro1309Gln, a missense (amino acid-changing) substitution, so BP7 is not applicable to this variant regardless of the SpliceAI null-impact result.

Rule
MSH6 InSiGHT VCEP CSpec v2.0 BP7: Synonymous or intronic variant only.
Evidence considered
  • VCEP BP7 rule (MSH6 InSiGHT CSpec v2.0): 'A synonymous (silent) or intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7 (5' / 3' exonic). Variants may satisfy both BP7 and BP4.' This variant's protein consequence is NP_000170.1:p.(Pro1309Gln), a missense change, so it does not meet the synonymous/intronic variant-type gate for BP7.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.936. BayesDel score = 0.508775. HCI prior probability for pathogenicity = 0.823. MAPP score = 17.67. Custom PP2 score = 0.99.

1 paper record listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    Nykamp K et al. · 2017
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 1720893)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.936. BayesDel score = 0.508775. HCI prior probability for pathogenicity = 0.823. MAPP score = 17.67. Custom PP2 score = 0.99.

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MSH6, a DNA mismatch repair protein, is frequently mutated in colorectal, small bowel, and endometrial cancers.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.