0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MEN1 c.35C>G, p.(Pro12Arg)

NM_000244.3:c.35C>G NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg) Missense · exon 2 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MEN1

MEN1 encodes menin, a tumor suppressor protein that helps control gene activity by modifying chromatin structure and histones. Loss of menin function causes multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1 syndrome), an inherited disorder marked by tumors of the pituitary, parathyroid, and pancreas. Menin interacts with several proteins that regulate cell growth and division, and its loss contributes to both inherited and sporadic endocrine tumors.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 3 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 3
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at supporting: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, with observed frequency 0 versus the generic PM2 threshold of <=0.0001.

PM5Moderate
PM5 · moderate

Met at moderate strength: disease-associated P12L at the same residue impaired menin-RPA2 binding in a yeast two-hybrid assay.

PP3Moderate
PP3 · moderate

Met at moderate strength: REVEL 0.879 exceeds the >=0.773 moderate PP3 threshold but is below the >=0.932 strong threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: PM5 (moderate), PP3 (moderate), and PM2 (supporting) provide two moderate and one supporting criterion, below generic ACMG thresholds for Likely Pathogenic or Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.879 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.879. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
4 reported laboratory submissions

4 Likely pathogenic. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MEN1, a transcriptional repressor, is altered by mutation and deletion in various cancer types, including parathyroid and endocrine cancers.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 8 not met · 12 not assessed · 5 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No MEN1-specific VCEP or gene-specific framework was available, so generic ACMG/AMP criterion concepts were used.

PS4, PP4, and BP5 remain not assessed because the available records lack the required quantitative enrichment or patient-level phenotype/alternative-cause evidence.

PP5 and BP6 are not met because the exact variant has zero ClinVar expert-panel submissions; the available records are single-submitter clinical-laboratory assertions.

No applicable MEN1-specific VCEP or gene-specific framework was available, so the supplied generic ACMG/AMP and ClinGen-SVI population rules were used.

The exact variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and the available gnomAD non-cancer subsets; this supports PM2 at supporting strength but does not support BA1, BS1, or BS2.

Met · 3

PM2 SupportingMet at supporting: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, with observed frequency 0 versus the generic PM2 threshold of <=0.0001. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is met at supporting strength. The exact variant NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (MEN1 p.Pro12Arg) is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1. It is also absent from the available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome-only subset and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes-only subset. With no applicable MEN1-specific VCEP specification, the supplied generic PM2 threshold of allele frequency <=0.0001 applies; the observed frequency is effectively 0 in each queried dataset.

Rule
Generic ACMG/ClinGen-SVI PM2: rare or absent from population databases, applied at supporting strength when allele frequency <=0.0001; no MEN1-specific VCEP framework was available.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the exact variant as absent; the queried record is the exome dataset.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the exact variant as absent.
  • The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome-only subset reports the variant as absent.
  • The available gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes-only subset reports the variant as absent; no non-cancer or exome-only requirement is specified by a governing VCEP because no MEN1-specific framework was available.
  • The supplied generic SVI PM2 threshold is allele frequency <=0.0001, with PM2 applied at supporting strength (ClinGen SVI recommendation, PMID:25741868).
Sources
PM5 ModerateMet at moderate strength: disease-associated P12L at the same residue impaired menin-RPA2 binding in a yeast two-hybrid assay. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PMID:12509449 identifies P12L as a disease-associated MEN1 missense mutation at the same residue and reports impaired menin-RPA2 binding in a yeast two-hybrid assay. P12L is a different missense substitution from the queried p.Pro12Arg and provides same-residue pathogenic evidence supporting classic PM5 at moderate strength; the functional result is not being treated as a direct assay of P12R.

Rule
PM5: novel missense change at an amino-acid residue where a different missense change is established as pathogenic; classic generic strength is moderate.
Evidence considered
  • The study tested 15 disease-associated MEN1 missense mutations and reported that P12L, the alternate substitution at residue 12, impaired menin-RPA2 binding to a variable degree.
  • The P12L result is used as same-residue comparator evidence for PM5 and is not extrapolated as a direct functional assay result for P12R.
Sources
PP3 ModerateMet at moderate strength: REVEL 0.879 exceeds the >=0.773 moderate PP3 threshold but is below the >=0.932 strong threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg), so PP3 is evaluated using the missense REVEL path only. REVEL is 0.879, which meets the calibrated moderate PP3 threshold of >=0.773 but not the strong threshold of >=0.932. This threshold is from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration by Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997. SpliceAI and BayesDel were not used for this criterion because the variant is missense and no governing VCEP specification is available.

Rule
For a missense variant, apply REVEL only; PP3 moderate applies at REVEL >=0.773 and strong at >=0.932, using Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is missense: NM_000244.3:c.35C>G, NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg).
  • The REVEL score is 0.879, meeting the moderate PP3 threshold of >=0.773 and not meeting the strong threshold of >=0.932.
  • The thresholds are the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration values from Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997.
  • No applicable MEN1-specific VCEP framework or PP3/BP4 lookup was available; generic calibrated ACMG/ClinGen SVI thresholds therefore apply.
Sources
revel

Not met · 8 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PP2 Not met: missense variants comprise approximately 10% of reported MEN1 mutations, so missense is not the predominant disease mechanism. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 is not supported because the MEN1 literature describes missense variants as a minority of germline mutations, approximately 10%, while most reported mutations are nonsense, deletions, or insertions. This does not support a gene-level pattern of unusually rare benign missense variation together with missense as the predominant disease mechanism.

Rule
PP2: missense variants are a common disease mechanism in the gene and benign missense variation is unusually rare.
Evidence considered
  • The MEN1 guideline review reports approximately 10% missense mutations, compared with approximately 25% nonsense, 45% small deletions, 15% small insertions, and less than 5% donor-splice mutations.
Sources
PP5 Not met: zero ClinVar expert-panel submissions exist for this exact variant, despite four Likely pathogenic laboratory records. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 is not met because the exact variant has zero ClinVar expert-panel submissions. The four exact-variant records are single-submitter clinical-laboratory Likely pathogenic assertions; ordinary laboratory submissions and the aggregate ClinVar label do not qualify for PP5.

Rule
Apply PP5 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification; non-expert submissions and aggregate labels do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar submission audit confirms an exact match, four single-submitter clinical-testing Likely pathogenic submissions, and expert_panel_submissions = 0.
  • The aggregate ClinVar label and non-expert laboratory assertions were excluded from PP5.
Sources
BA1 Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, far below the generic BA1 allele-frequency threshold of 0.05. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The exact variant NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (MEN1 p.Pro12Arg) is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so its observed allele frequency is not at or above the generic stand-alone threshold of 0.05 from ACMG/AMP 2015 (PMID:25741868). The available non-cancer subsets also report the variant as absent; no population source supports a common allele frequency. No MEN1-specific VCEP specification was available, so the generic threshold applies.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BA1: stand-alone benign evidence requires allele frequency >=0.05; no MEN1-specific VCEP framework was available.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the exact variant as absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the exact variant as absent.
  • The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer and v3.1 non-cancer records also report the variant as absent; no governing VCEP requires a different population source here.
  • The generic ACMG/AMP 2015 BA1 threshold is allele frequency >=0.05 (PMID:25741868).
Sources
BS1 Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, below the generic BS1 allele-frequency threshold of 0.01. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The exact variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, and is also absent from the available non-cancer subsets, rather than occurring at a frequency greater than expected for MEN1. Therefore it does not meet the generic BS1 threshold of allele frequency >=0.01. No MEN1-specific VCEP specification was available.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS1: strong benign evidence requires allele frequency greater than expected for the disorder; supplied generic threshold >=0.01; no MEN1-specific VCEP framework was available.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the exact variant as absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the exact variant as absent.
  • The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer and v3.1 non-cancer records also report the variant as absent.
  • The generic BS1 threshold is allele frequency >=0.01, using the supplied generic SVI default and per-gene derivation preference (Whiffin et al., PMID:28518168).
Sources
BS2 Not met: no healthy-individual or homozygote observation is reported; population databases instead report the variant as absent. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not met. The available population evidence shows the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and the available non-cancer subsets; it provides no observation of the variant in healthy adults, including no homozygote observation. Absence from a population database is evidence for rarity and PM2, not positive BS2 evidence of occurrence in unaffected individuals.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS2 requires observation in healthy adults, including healthy homozygotes for a recessive disorder; no such observation is available.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the exact variant as absent and therefore provides no homozygote or unaffected-carrier observation.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the exact variant as absent and therefore provides no homozygote or unaffected-carrier observation.
  • The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer and v3.1 non-cancer records also report the variant as absent.
  • No case-specific population evidence documents the variant in healthy adults or in homozygous state.
Sources
BP1 Not met: MEN1 includes disease-associated missense variants, including same-residue P12L with impaired menin-RPA2 binding. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 is not met because, although MEN1 loss of function is an important disease mechanism, the literature also documents disease-associated missense variants, including P12L at the same residue as the queried variant, with impaired menin-RPA2 binding. Therefore missense variation in MEN1 cannot be treated as generally outside the established disease mechanism.

Rule
BP1: missense variants are generally not a known disease mechanism in a gene where truncating variants cause disease.
Evidence considered
  • MEN1 is described as having a substantial loss-of-function mutation burden, but missense mutations are also documented among disease-associated variants.
  • P12L, an alternate missense change at residue 12, impaired menin-RPA2 interaction in a functional assay, arguing against applying BP1 broadly to this MEN1 missense variant.
Sources
BP4 Not met: REVEL 0.879 exceeds the most permissive <=0.29 supporting BP4 threshold for benign computational evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg), so BP4 is evaluated using the missense REVEL path only. REVEL is 0.879, which exceeds all calibrated benign BP4 cutoffs (supporting <=0.29, moderate <=0.183, and strong <=0.016); therefore BP4 is not met. This threshold set is from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration by Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997. The SpliceAI score was not substituted because a missense variant's splice prediction cannot establish BP4, and BayesDel has no applicable generic calibration.

Rule
For a missense variant, apply REVEL only; BP4 supporting applies at REVEL <=0.29, moderate at <=0.183, and strong at <=0.016, using Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is missense: NM_000244.3:c.35C>G, NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg).
  • The REVEL score is 0.879, above the BP4 supporting cutoff of <=0.29, the moderate cutoff of <=0.183, and the strong cutoff of <=0.016.
  • The thresholds are the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration values from Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997.
  • SpliceAI was not used because this missense variant must be assessed through the REVEL path only; BayesDel was not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
BP6 Not met: zero ClinVar expert-panel submissions provide an exact-variant Benign or Likely benign classification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 is not met because the exact variant has zero ClinVar expert-panel submissions. The four exact-variant records are single-submitter clinical-laboratory Likely pathogenic assertions, with no expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification; non-expert and aggregate records cannot trigger BP6.

Rule
Apply BP6 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification; non-expert submissions and aggregate labels do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar submission audit confirms an exact match, four single-submitter clinical-testing Likely pathogenic submissions, and expert_panel_submissions = 0.
  • No exact-variant expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion exists, so BP6 was not applied.
Sources

Not assessed · 12 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no alternate nucleotide change producing p.Pro12Arg was documented in the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 requires a previously reported pathogenic variant producing the same amino-acid change, p.Pro12Arg, through a different nucleotide change. The reviewed case evidence identifies the queried c.35C>G variant but does not document an alternate nucleotide change producing p.Pro12Arg. A systematic codon-level search for all alternate nucleotide representations was not available, so PS1 cannot be concluded from the available evidence.

Rule
PS1: same amino-acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, caused by a different nucleotide change.
Evidence considered
  • The variant is NM_000244.3:c.35C>G, encoding NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg); no alternate nucleotide change yielding the same amino-acid substitution was documented in the reviewed evidence.
Still missing
  • Systematic search for all alternate nucleotide changes encoding p.Pro12Arg and their pathogenic classifications.
PS2 Not assessed: no parental genotypes or confirmed de novo observation are documented for the proband's NM_000244.3:c.35C>G variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-level evidence documents that NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg) arose de novo in the proband. The available records do not provide parental genotypes, confirmed parental relationship, maternity/paternity confirmation, or a clinically consistent phenotype assessment sufficient to apply PS2.

Evidence considered
  • The case-level evidence reviewed contains no documented parental genotypes or confirmed de novo finding for NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg).
  • ClinVar records identify the variant as germline and likely pathogenic but do not provide sufficient proband-parent testing details to establish PS2.
Still missing
  • Parental testing results for the variant
  • Confirmation of maternity and paternity if de novo status is claimed
  • Proband phenotype documentation relevant to MEN1
PS3 Not assessed: no reviewed functional study directly tested MEN1 p.Pro12Arg, while same-codon p.Pro12Leu results cannot establish PS3 for p.Pro12Arg. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable MEN1-specific VCEP specification was available, so generic ACMG/AMP functional-evidence principles were used. The variant is NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (NP_000235.2:p.Pro12Arg). The reviewed functional literature includes a same-codon P12L yeast two-hybrid interaction result and other MEN1 missense-mutant stability, phosphorylation, degradation, and transcriptional assays, but none directly tested P12R. Because PS3 requires a well-established functional study of the variant itself with interpretable controls and biologically relevant assay results, findings for P12L or other substitutions cannot be transferred to P12R. No validated assay result, assay control set, or quantitative functional measurement for P12R was identified; therefore PS3 cannot be applied at any strength.

Evidence considered
  • PMID:12509449 tested the different substitution p.Pro12Leu in a Gal4-based yeast two-hybrid assay and reported impaired menin-RPA2 binding; the paper explicitly provides no result for p.Pro12Arg, so the same-codon result was not extrapolated.
  • PMID:15254225 evaluated other MEN1 missense mutants, including p.Pro12Leu, using expression, stability, degradation, immunofluorescence, immunoprecipitation, and ubiquitination assays; p.Pro12Arg was not tested.
  • PMID:21264250 tested p.Pro12Leu and other MEN1 mutants in phosphorylation assays after DNA damage; p.Pro12Arg was not tested and the functional significance of the phosphorylation findings was unresolved.
  • PMID:21819486 evaluated other MEN1 variants with protein-stability and JunD-repression assays; p.Pro12Arg was not tested.
  • PMID:22090276 evaluated other MEN1 missense mutants with degradation, rescue, transcriptional, and cytostatic assays; p.Pro12Arg was not tested.
  • No direct P12R functional assay result with assay controls and a quantitative readout was identified, so PS3 is not applied.
Still missing
  • A validated, biologically relevant assay directly testing MEN1 p.Pro12Arg is needed.
  • The direct study should report appropriate wild-type, pathogenic or loss-of-function, and assay-performance controls with interpretable quantitative results.
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no exact-variant case-control counts or statistically significant phenotype-enrichment metric is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No MEN1-specific VCEP framework was available. The case materials contain no exact-variant affected-case and control counts, odds ratio, likelihood ratio, or statistically significant phenotype-enrichment result for NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg). The exact-variant ClinVar records are laboratory classifications, not case-control data, so PS4 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic PS4 requires statistically significant enrichment of the variant in affected individuals compared with appropriate controls; no applicable VCEP specification was available.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar contains four exact-variant single-submitter Likely pathogenic laboratory submissions but no affected-case/control counts or enrichment statistic.
  • No retrieved publication provides an exact-variant PS4 case-control result.
Still missing
  • A quantitative exact-variant case-control or phenotype-enrichment study is not available.
Sources
PM1 Not assessed: no authoritative MEN1 critical-domain boundary or significant hotspot was available for residue 12. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No MEN1-specific VCEP framework or authoritative domain table was available. The available evidence documents functional effects for another codon-12 substitution, P12L, but does not establish that residue 12 lies within a well-established critical functional domain or statistically supported mutational hotspot meeting PM1. The hotspot query returned no statistically significant hotspot, and no complete domain specification was available for review.

Rule
PM1: variant located in a well-established critical functional domain or hotspot without benign variation, using a governing specification when available.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:12509449 tested the codon-12 P12L substitution in a menin-RPA2 interaction assay, but a single residue-level functional result does not establish a PM1-qualifying critical domain.
  • The case evidence reports no statistically significant cancer hotspot at MEN1 P12.
Still missing
  • MEN1-specific validated critical functional-domain boundaries or hotspot criteria covering residue 12.
Sources
PM6 Not assessed: no documented phenotype and negative family history support an assumed de novo MEN1 variant in the absence of parental testing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-level evidence supports an assumed de novo occurrence of NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg) without parental testing. The available records do not describe a proband with a phenotype consistent with MEN1 together with a documented negative family history and credible de novo inference.

Evidence considered
  • The available case records do not document the phenotype, family history, or clinical circumstances needed to infer de novo status under PM6.
  • No publication in the extracted literature provides a case-specific assumed de novo observation for NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg).
Still missing
  • Detailed proband phenotype and age at assessment
  • Documented negative family history with appropriate relatives and ages
  • Evidence supporting de novo inference despite absent parental testing
PP1 Not assessed: no affected relatives, variant-positive family members, or informative meioses are documented for segregation analysis. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No informative affected relatives, family members carrying NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg), or documented meioses are reported. Consequently, there is no segregation dataset from which to assign PP1 strength.

Evidence considered
  • The case-level evidence contains no family segregation observations for NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg).
  • The extracted publications reviewed for this variant do not report variant-specific segregation or informative meioses.
Still missing
  • Family pedigree and affected-relative clinical data
  • Genotypes of informative relatives
  • Number of informative meioses and segregation results
PP4 Not assessed: no patient-specific, highly specific MEN1 phenotype or family history is documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No MEN1-specific VCEP framework was available. The case materials identify MEN1 and the variant but provide no patient-level phenotype, diagnostic features, or family history showing a phenotype highly specific for MEN1. General MEN1 clinical descriptions do not establish a phenotype for this individual, so PP4 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic PP4 requires a phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single-gene etiology; no applicable VCEP specification was available.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar identifies the exact variant in MEN1 but reports laboratory classifications rather than a patient phenotype.
  • PMID:11739416 provides general MEN1 clinical context and does not document this exact variant or a patient-specific phenotype.
Still missing
  • Patient-level phenotype and diagnostic features are not provided.
  • No disease-specific phenotype-specificity assessment is available.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no reviewed assay directly demonstrated normal function for MEN1 p.Pro12Arg, and other MEN1 substitutions cannot establish BS3 for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable MEN1-specific VCEP specification was available, so generic ACMG/AMP functional-evidence principles were used. BS3 requires a well-established functional study showing that the tested variant does not impair the relevant gene or protein function, with suitable controls and a biologically relevant assay. The reviewed MEN1 functional papers tested p.Pro12Leu or other substitutions, not p.Pro12Arg; their results neither demonstrate normal function nor provide a benign functional result for this variant. Consequently, there is no direct evidence supporting BS3, and BS3 cannot be applied at any strength.

Evidence considered
  • PMID:12509449 found impaired RPA2 binding for p.Pro12Leu in a yeast two-hybrid assay, not normal function for p.Pro12Arg; the result cannot support BS3 for p.Pro12Arg.
  • PMID:15254225 reported abnormal stability and degradation for other MEN1 missense mutants, including p.Pro12Leu, but did not test p.Pro12Arg or establish its functional behavior.
  • PMID:21264250 reported altered phosphorylation for p.Pro12Leu and other mutants, not p.Pro12Arg, and stated that the functional significance remained unresolved.
  • PMID:21819486 reported stability and JunD-repression results for other MEN1 variants, not p.Pro12Arg; no benign functional result for p.Pro12Arg was provided.
  • PMID:22090276 reported functional assays for other MEN1 missense mutants, not p.Pro12Arg; no preserved-function result for p.Pro12Arg was identified.
  • Because no direct normal-function assay for p.Pro12Arg with appropriate controls was identified, BS3 is not applied.
Still missing
  • A validated, biologically relevant assay directly testing MEN1 p.Pro12Arg is needed to evaluate benign function.
  • The direct study should include appropriate wild-type, known-benign, and known-damaging controls plus quantitative evidence of preserved function.
Sources
BS4 Not assessed: no unaffected variant-positive relatives or phenotype-based non-segregation observations are documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No clinically evaluated unaffected relatives who carry NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg) are documented. There is therefore no non-segregation observation that can support BS4, and the absence of family data cannot be treated as evidence against segregation.

Evidence considered
  • No unaffected relative carrying NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg) is reported in the available case evidence.
  • No publication in the extracted literature provides variant-specific non-segregation evidence for this variant.
Still missing
  • Genotypes of clinically evaluated unaffected relatives
  • Ages and surveillance status of relatives
  • Documented phenotype-genotype discordance
BP2 Not assessed: no affected-proband genotype, cis/trans phase, or co-occurring pathogenic/benign allele is documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No gene-specific VCEP specification was available. Generic BP2 for a dominant disorder requires documented phase showing the evaluated variant in trans with a pathogenic variant, or another qualifying allelic configuration under the applicable disease model. The case evidence provides no affected-proband genotype, second allele, cis/trans phase, or segregation result, so BP2 cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • The available case materials do not document a second allele in an affected proband.
  • No cis/trans phase or segregation result is available to evaluate the allelic configuration required for BP2.
Still missing
  • Affected-proband genotype data identifying a second allele
  • Validated cis/trans phase information
  • Inheritance or segregation data for the evaluated variant and any second allele
BP5 Not assessed: no patient-level evidence shows an alternative molecular diagnosis explaining the relevant phenotype. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No MEN1-specific VCEP framework was available. No patient-level case demonstrates that the relevant phenotype is explained by an alternative molecular cause, and no alternative pathogenic diagnosis is documented for a case involving this exact variant. Therefore the evidence is insufficient to assess BP5.

Rule
Generic BP5 requires the variant to be found in a case whose phenotype is explained by an alternative molecular cause; no applicable VCEP specification was available.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar contains exact-variant laboratory submissions but no patient-level alternative molecular diagnosis or phenotype attribution suitable for BP5.
  • No applicable VCEP-specific BP5 rule or quantitative BP5 threshold was retrieved.
Still missing
  • Patient-level phenotype and molecular workup are not provided.
  • No alternative pathogenic variant or other molecular cause is documented for a relevant case.
Sources
Not applicable · 5· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/APVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_000244.3:c.35C>G in MEN1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM3 N/ANot applicable: MEN1 is described as autosomal dominant, so the recessive biallelic/in-trans affected-proband PM3 framework does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No gene-specific VCEP specification was available. Generic PM3 is intended for evidence of the evaluated variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in an affected individual with a recessive disorder. MEN1 is described as autosomal dominant, so a recessive biallelic PM3 assessment is not applicable to this disease context. The available evidence contains no affected-proband biallelic observation or phase data that would alter this inheritance-based determination.

Evidence considered
  • The reviewed clinical-sequencing guidance lists MEN1 as autosomal dominant; this inheritance mode makes generic recessive PM3 inapplicable.
  • No affected-proband observation documenting the evaluated variant in trans with a pathogenic allele was identified.
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_000244.3:c.35C>G in MEN1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ABP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_000244.3:c.35C>G in MEN1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ABP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_000244.3:c.35C>G in MEN1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
MEN1
Transcript
NM_000244.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000244.3:c.35C>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg)
GRCh38
chr11:64810075 G>C
GRCh37
chr11:64577547 G>C
Location and type
Exon 2 · missense
ClinVar
1733068

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MEN1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000244.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MEN1NM_000244.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -254 bp
0.004
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +57 bp
0.001
SpliceAI donor lossat +193 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat -421 bp
0.003
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.002
Pangolin splice gain
0.003

Other predictors

REVEL
0.879
BayesDel
0.561

How the predictions were used

PP3 ModerateMet at moderate strength: REVEL 0.879 exceeds the >=0.773 moderate PP3 threshold but is below the >=0.932 strong threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg), so PP3 is evaluated using the missense REVEL path only. REVEL is 0.879, which meets the calibrated moderate PP3 threshold of >=0.773 but not the strong threshold of >=0.932. This threshold is from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration by Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997. SpliceAI and BayesDel were not used for this criterion because the variant is missense and no governing VCEP specification is available.

Rule
For a missense variant, apply REVEL only; PP3 moderate applies at REVEL >=0.773 and strong at >=0.932, using Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is missense: NM_000244.3:c.35C>G, NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg).
  • The REVEL score is 0.879, meeting the moderate PP3 threshold of >=0.773 and not meeting the strong threshold of >=0.932.
  • The thresholds are the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration values from Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997.
  • No applicable MEN1-specific VCEP framework or PP3/BP4 lookup was available; generic calibrated ACMG/ClinGen SVI thresholds therefore apply.
Sources
revel
BP4 Not met: REVEL 0.879 exceeds the most permissive <=0.29 supporting BP4 threshold for benign computational evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, NM_000244.3:c.35C>G (p.Pro12Arg), so BP4 is evaluated using the missense REVEL path only. REVEL is 0.879, which exceeds all calibrated benign BP4 cutoffs (supporting <=0.29, moderate <=0.183, and strong <=0.016); therefore BP4 is not met. This threshold set is from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration by Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997. The SpliceAI score was not substituted because a missense variant's splice prediction cannot establish BP4, and BayesDel has no applicable generic calibration.

Rule
For a missense variant, apply REVEL only; BP4 supporting applies at REVEL <=0.29, moderate at <=0.183, and strong at <=0.016, using Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).
Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is missense: NM_000244.3:c.35C>G, NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg).
  • The REVEL score is 0.879, above the BP4 supporting cutoff of <=0.29, the moderate cutoff of <=0.183, and the strong cutoff of <=0.016.
  • The thresholds are the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration values from Pejaver et al. (2022), PMID:36413997.
  • SpliceAI was not used because this missense variant must be assessed through the REVEL path only; BayesDel was not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established.
Sources
revel
BP7 N/ABP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_000244.3:c.35C>G in MEN1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000235.2:p.(Pro12Arg). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.879. BayesDel score = 0.561369.

9 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Cited in the classification

  • The 32-kilodalton subunit of replication protein A interacts with menin, the product of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene.
    Sukhodolets KE et al. · 2003 Jan
    The study reports that the disease-associated MEN1 missense mutation P12L, which affects the same codon as the queried P12R variant, impaired menin-RPA2 binding in a Gal4-based yeast two-hybrid assay. It does not report the queried P12R variant.
    → PM5 · moderate Does not name this variant
    PMID 12509449 ↗
    Source detail
    Of the 15 mutations tested, three (H139D, A160P, and A176P) abolished the interaction completely, eight (P12L, L22R, H139Y, F144V, F159C, L286P, A309P, and T344R) impaired binding to various degrees, and four (A164D, W183S, W436R, and F447S) had little or no effect.

    Location Results, ‘Effect of disease-associated MEN1 missense mutations on menin-RPA2 interaction’; Table 3

    Context Gal4-based yeast two-hybrid assay measuring interaction between wild-type or mutant menin and RPA2; 15 disease-associated MEN1 missense mutations were tested.

Other recorded publications

  • Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2.
    The MEN1 guideline review describes a diverse mutation spectrum dominated by nonsense and small insertion/deletion variants, with approximately 10% missense mutations, and describes MEN1 tumor formation as resulting from loss of menin function through inherited and somatic inactivation of both MEN1 copies.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 11739416 ↗
    Quoted passage
    MEN1 mutations are scattered in and around the open reading frame of menin and are diverse in their types; approximately 25% are nonsense, approximately 45% are small deletions, approximately 15% are small insertions, less than 5% are donor-splice mutations, and approximately 10% are missense mutations, predicted to change one to three amino acids in menin (1, 8, 10, 62–64).

    Section: ‘Screening of DNA OR of tumor expressions in diagnosis of the MEN1 carrier,’ page 5662

  • Menin missense mutants associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 are rapidly degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
    Yaguchi H et al. · 2004
    The study evaluated other MEN1 missense mutants, including p.Pro12Leu, in transiently transfected cell systems and found markedly reduced protein levels, short half-lives, and ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation; p.Pro12Arg was not tested.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 15254225 ↗
    Quoted passage
    all of the MEN1 mutants tested for this study were expressed at extremely low levels compared to the WT protein

    Results, ‘MEN1 disease-associated single amino acid mutations reduce the stability of menin protein,’ and Figures 1–4

  • The menin tumor suppressor protein is phosphorylated in response to DNA damage.
    Francis J et al. · 2011
    The study tested p.Pro12Leu and other MEN1 missense mutants in DNA-damage-responsive phosphorylation assays and observed altered phosphorylation for p.Pro12Leu; p.Pro12Arg was not tested and the functional significance of the changes remained unresolved.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 21264250 ↗
    Quoted passage
    As shown in Figure 6A, the mutants P12L, L22R, and A309P fail to achieve the level of Ser394 phosphorylation that is observed in the wild type menin and the H139D and A242Vmutants.

    Results, ‘MEN1-associated missense menin mutants show altered Ser394 and Ser487 phosphorylation,’ paragraph 1; Figure 6A

  • Correlation of mutant menin stability with clinical expression of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and its incomplete forms.
    Shimazu S et al. · 2011
    The study evaluated other MEN1 missense and in-frame variants using protein-stability and JunD-dependent transactivation-repression assays. It reported reduced stability for tested typical-MEN1 mutants and near-wild-type stability for some other variants, but p.Pro12Arg was not tested.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 21819486 ↗
    Quoted passage
    All tested mutants associated with typical MEN1 showed reduced stability. Some missense and in-frame deletion mutants (G28A, R171W, T197I, E255K, E274A, Y353del and E366D) associated with FIHP or ASPT were almost as stable as or only slightly less stable than wild-type menin, while others were as unstable as those associated with typical MEN1.

    Abstract; Results, ‘Steady-state expression levels of variant menin proteins’ and ‘Repression of JunD-mediated transactivation by variant menin’

  • Menin missense mutants encoded by the MEN1 gene that are targeted to the proteasome: restoration of expression and activity by CHIP siRNA.
    Canaff L et al. · 2012
    The study examined other MEN1 missense mutants with degradation, proteasome-inhibitor and chaperone-rescue experiments, and downstream transcriptional and cytostatic assays. p.Pro12Arg was not tested.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 22090276 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Almost without exception, the menin mutants were expressed at markedly reduced levels relative to WT menin and were targeted to the proteasome and rapidly degraded.

    Discussion, final section; Results sections on menin missense mutant degradation and CHIP siRNA rescue

  • ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
    The paper lists MEN1 as the gene associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and describes the condition as autosomal dominant. It does not provide variant-specific observations, segregation data, or cis/trans phase information for MEN1 c.35C>G (p.(P12R)).
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 23788249 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 131100 20301710 Child/adult MEN1 613733 AD KP and EP

    Table 1, Conditions, genes, and variants recommended for return of incidental findings in clinical sequencing

  • ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25356965 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (4 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 1733068)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.879. BayesDel score = 0.561369.

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MEN1, a transcriptional repressor, is altered by mutation and deletion in various cancer types, including parathyroid and endocrine cancers.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.