0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MLH1 c.1515T>C, p.(Ser505=)

NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C NP_000240.1:p.(Ser505=) View identifiers
Classification
Likely benign

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely benign. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely benign.A likely benign classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MLH1

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen MLH1 VCEP v2.0.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 2
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 2
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

VCEP BP4 specifies that for synonymous variants, SpliceAI delta score ≤ 0.1 qualifies as BP4_supporting. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), consistent with a synonymous variant that does not alter splicing.

BP7Supporting
BP7 · supporting

VCEP BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants at or beyond -21/+7 from exonic splice boundaries. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C (p.Ser505=) is a synonymous variant located at position +105 from the exon 13 donor splice site and -43 from the exon 13 acceptor splice site, both well beyond the -21/+7 splice consensus boundaries. This deep exonic synonymous substitution is unlikely to affect splicing.

Recorded classification: Likely benign

ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for MLH1 Version 2.0.0 v2.0.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule19 (Benign.Supporting >=2) with applied criteria: BP4 supporting benign, BP7 supporting benign; maps to Likely Benign.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
5 / 1,614,044 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 5 / 1,614,044 alleles. Recorded AF 3.09781e-06. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.98829e-05; MAF= 0.00199%, 5/251472 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000217462; MAF= 0.02175%, 4/18394 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 7.353e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
7 reported laboratory submissions

5 Likely benign · 1 Likely Benign · 1 Benign. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen MLH1 VCEP v2.0.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

29 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 12 not met · 0 not assessed · 15 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C is a synonymous variant (p.Ser505=) in MLH1 exon 13, located well beyond splice consensus boundaries at c.1515 (+105 from donor, -43 from acceptor).

SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00), meeting BP4_supporting under the InSiGHT MLH1 VCEP specification.

The variant meets BP7_supporting as a synonymous substitution at or beyond -21/+7 from exonic splice boundaries, where it is unlikely to alter splicing.

The variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 at low frequency (grpmax FAF = 2.978e-05; 5/1,614,044 alleles) but does not meet PM2_supporting (threshold <0.00002) or BS1 (threshold ≥0.0001).

No functional data, tumor pathology data, co-segregation data, de novo observations, or variant-specific literature were identified for this variant.

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign by 7 clinical laboratories (ClinVar Variation ID: 413362).

Under the InSiGHT MLH1 VCEP v2.0.0 combining rules, two supporting benign criteria (BP4 + BP7) yield a classification of Likely Benign (Rule 19: ≥2 Benign Supporting).

Met · 2

BP4 SupportingVCEP BP4 specifies that for synonymous variants, SpliceAI delta score ≤ 0.1 qualifies as BP4_supporting. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), consistent with a synonymous variant that does not alter splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 for NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C
  • synonymous variant with no predicted splice impact
Sources
BP7 SupportingVCEP BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants at or beyond -21/+7 from exonic splice boundaries. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C (p.Ser505=) is a synonymous variant located at position +105 from the exon 13 donor splice site and -43 from the exon 13 acceptor splice site, both well beyond the -21/+7 splice consensus boundaries. This deep exonic synonymous substitution is unlikely to affect splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous variant p.(Ser505=) at c.1515 in exon 13
  • position +105 from donor
  • -43 from acceptor
  • beyond -21/+7 boundaries

Not met · 12 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS2 No de novo observations have been reported for this variant. No evidence of de novo occurrence was identified in ClinVar submissions, publications, or other sources. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No de novo testing or family studies available
PS3 No functional data are available for this synonymous variant (p.Ser505=). The variant was not directly tested in any calibrated MMR functional assay. The VCEP functional assay spreadsheet does not include data for this variant, and OncoKB lists Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no associated PMIDs. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No functional assay data available for this synonymous variant
PM2 VCEP PM2 rule requires gnomAD v4 grpmax filtering allele frequency < 0.00002 (<1 in 50,000 alleles). The observed gnomAD v4 grpmax FAF is 2.978e-05 (0.00002978), which exceeds the 0.00002 threshold. The variant is present in 5/1,614,044 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 and 5/251,472 alleles in gnomAD v2.1. Does not meet the PM2_supporting frequency criterion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF = 2.978e-05 exceeds VCEP PM2 threshold of <0.00002
Sources
PP1 No co-segregation data are available for this variant. No pedigrees or family studies were identified in the evidence sources. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No co-segregation or pedigree data available
PP3 VCEP PP3 requires HCI prior probability >0.68 (missense) or SpliceAI delta ≥ 0.2 for non-canonical splice sites. HCI prior was not found for this variant. SpliceAI max delta score is 0.00, well below the 0.2 threshold. No evidence supports a damaging effect from in silico predictions. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (no predicted splice impact)
  • HCI prior not available for c.1515T>C
Sources
PP4 No tumor data demonstrating MSI-H status or loss of MMR protein expression consistent with the variant location are available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No tumor MSI/IHC data available
BA1 VCEP BA1 requires gnomAD v4 grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.001 (0.1%). The observed gnomAD v4 grpmax FAF is 2.978e-05, far below the 0.1% threshold. BA1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF = 2.978e-05 is well below BA1 threshold of 0.001
Sources
BS1 VCEP BS1 requires gnomAD v4 grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.0001 and < 0.001 (0.01-0.1%). The observed gnomAD v4 grpmax FAF is 2.978e-05, which is below the lower threshold of 0.0001. BS1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF = 2.978e-05 is below BS1 lower threshold of 0.0001
Sources
BS2 No evidence of co-occurrence in trans with a known pathogenic variant in a patient with CRC after age 45 without clinical manifestations of CMMRD. No phase-confirmed observations available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No trans co-occurrence data available
BS3 No functional studies demonstrating a benign effect are available for this variant. The variant has not been evaluated in any calibrated MMR functional assay or other functional system. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No functional assay data available
BS4 No lack-of-segregation data are available for this variant. No pedigrees demonstrating non-segregation with disease were identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No segregation data available
BP5 No tumor data demonstrating MSS status or absence of MMR protein expression loss are available for this variant. BP5 requires multiple tumors with MSS and/or no loss of MMR protein expression. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No tumor MSS/IHC data available
Not applicable · 15· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ASynonymous variant encoding p.(Ser505=) with no predicted effect on protein sequence. PVS1 is reserved for null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, initiation codon) and does not apply to synonymous substitutions under the MLH1 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PS1 N/APS1 requires a different nucleotide change producing the same amino acid change, or the same splice nucleotide as known pathogenic splice variant. This is a synonymous variant with no amino acid change; PS1 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PS4 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates PS4 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM1 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates PM1 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM3 N/ARecessive disorder trans-configuration criterion; not applicable to the assessment scope for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM4 VCEPProtein length change criterion; variant is a synonymous substitution with no effect on protein length. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM5 N/APM5 requires a different missense change at the same amino acid residue as a known pathogenic missense variant. This is a synonymous variant (p.Ser505=) with no amino acid change; PM5 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM6 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates PM6 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PP2 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates PP2 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PP5 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates PP5 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP1 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates BP1 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP2 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates BP2 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP3 VCEPBP3 applies to in-frame deletions and insertions in repetitive regions; variant is a synonymous substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP6 VCEPVCEP InSiGHT MLH1 specification explicitly designates BP6 as Not Applicable for use under this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PS5 N/APS5 requires the same amino acid change as an established pathogenic variant from a different nucleotide change. This is a synonymous variant with no amino acid change; PS5 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

Identifiers

Gene
MLH1
Transcript
NM_000249.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000240.1:p.(Ser505=)
GRCh38
chr3:37028889 T>C
GRCh37
chr3:37070380 T>C
ClinVar
413362

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MLH1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000249.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MLH1NM_000249.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 5 / 1,614,044 alleles AF 3.1e-06 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 2.98e-05
gnomAD v2.1 5 / 251,472 alleles AF 1.99e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 7.35e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 3.1e-06 · 5 / 1,614,044 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 3e-05
East Asian4 / 44,880 8.9e-05
European (non-Finnish)1 / 1,180,006 8.5e-07
0 alternate alleles recorded in 8 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 2e-05 · 5 / 251,472 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 7.4e-05
East Asian4 / 18,394 0.00022
European (non-Finnish)1 / 113,748 8.8e-06
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.09781e-06; MAF= 0.00031%, 5/1614044 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 8.91266e-05; MAF= 0.00891%, 4/44880 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.978e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.98829e-05; MAF= 0.00199%, 5/251472 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000217462; MAF= 0.02175%, 4/18394 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 7.353e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +16 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -105 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat -35 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +43 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.000
Pangolin splice gain
0.000

Other predictors

REVEL
0.343
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingVCEP BP4 specifies that for synonymous variants, SpliceAI delta score ≤ 0.1 qualifies as BP4_supporting. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), consistent with a synonymous variant that does not alter splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 for NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C
  • synonymous variant with no predicted splice impact
Sources
BP7 SupportingVCEP BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants at or beyond -21/+7 from exonic splice boundaries. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C (p.Ser505=) is a synonymous variant located at position +105 from the exon 13 donor splice site and -43 from the exon 13 acceptor splice site, both well beyond the -21/+7 splice consensus boundaries. This deep exonic synonymous substitution is unlikely to affect splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous variant p.(Ser505=) at c.1515 in exon 13
  • position +105 from donor
  • -43 from acceptor
  • beyond -21/+7 boundaries
PP3 VCEP PP3 requires HCI prior probability >0.68 (missense) or SpliceAI delta ≥ 0.2 for non-canonical splice sites. HCI prior was not found for this variant. SpliceAI max delta score is 0.00, well below the 0.2 threshold. No evidence supports a damaging effect from in silico predictions. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (no predicted splice impact)
  • HCI prior not available for c.1515T>C
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.343.

7 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    ACMG/AMP 2015 standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C was not identified in this paper.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.
    Trepanier A et al. · 2004
    Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors for cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C was not identified in this paper.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 15604628 ↗
  • Informing family members of individuals with Lynch syndrome: a guideline for clinical geneticists.
    Menko FH et al. · 2013
    Guideline for clinical geneticists on informing family members of individuals with Lynch syndrome. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C was not identified in this paper.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 23535968 ↗
  • ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
    Green RC et al. · 2013
    ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C was not identified in this paper.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 23788249 ↗
  • ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25356965 ↗
  • Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline endorsement of the familial risk-colorectal cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Stoffel EM et al. · 2015
    ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline endorsement of ESMO guidelines for familial risk-colorectal cancer. NM_000249.4:c.1515T>C was not identified in this paper.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25452455 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.09781e-06; MAF= 0.00031%, 5/1614044 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 8.91266e-05; MAF= 0.00891%, 4/44880 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.978e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.98829e-05; MAF= 0.00199%, 5/251472 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000217462; MAF= 0.02175%, 4/18394 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 7.353e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (5 clinical laboratories) and as Likely Benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 413362)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.343.

Functional

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.