0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MSH2 c.793-11_794dup, p.?

NM_000251.3:c.793-11_794dup NP_000242.1:p.? View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MSH2

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen MSH2 VCEP v2.0.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, which is below the MSH2 PM2_Supporting threshold of less than 0.00002 (less than 1 in 50,000 alleles).

PP3Supporting
PP3 · supporting

SpliceAI predicts a splice defect with a maximum delta score of 0.71, which is above the MSH2 PP3 threshold of 0.2 for non-canonical splice nucleotides and supports a predicted splicing impact.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

Official InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis CSPEC final-classification framework (criteria-combination rules derived from Richards et al. 2015 and retrieved in final_classification_framework.json) was applied to the adjudicated criteria.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
No screenshot for this evidence
Functional evidence
Not recorded

No standalone functional evidence summary is recorded in evidence_summary.functional.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Context only COSMIC ↗
For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen MSH2 VCEP v2.0.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 6 not met · 9 not assessed · 11 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The MSH2 c.793-11_794dup (NP_000242.1:p.?) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1; in gnomAD v4.1 the observed allele frequency is 0, which is below the MSH2 PM2_Supporting threshold of less than 0.00002.

SpliceAI predicts a splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.71, which is above the MSH2 PP3 threshold of 0.2 for non-canonical splice variants and above the BP4 no-impact threshold of 0.1.

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingThis variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, which is below the MSH2 PM2_Supporting threshold of less than 0.00002 (less than 1 in 50,000 alleles). Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Absent/extremely rare allele frequency <0.00002 in gnomAD v4
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: absent
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent
  • PM2_Supporting threshold: AF < 0.00002
Sources
evidence.json.results.gnomad.GNOMAD_V4_1evidence.json.results.gnomad.GNOMAD_V2_1MSH2/criteria.json
PP3 SupportingSpliceAI predicts a splice defect with a maximum delta score of 0.71, which is above the MSH2 PP3 threshold of 0.2 for non-canonical splice nucleotides and supports a predicted splicing impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Predicted splice defect for non-canonical splicing nucleotides using SpliceAI with delta score >=0.2
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI DS_AG: 0.71
  • SpliceAI max delta score: 0.71
  • PP3 threshold for non-canonical splice variants: >=0.2
Sources
evidence.json.results.spliceaicase_summary.compact_evidence.spliceaiMSH2/criteria.json

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

BP7 This intronic duplication is located at c.793-11_794dup, which is 11 nucleotides upstream of the exon boundary. This does not meet the MSH2 BP7 positional requirement of at or beyond -21 in the intron. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
A synonymous or intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7
Evidence considered
  • Variant position: c.793-11_794dup
  • BP7 threshold for intronic variants: at or beyond -21
Sources
prefetch.normalize.variant_validatorMSH2/criteria.json
BP4 For intronic variants, BP4 requires SpliceAI to predict no splicing impact with a delta score of 0.1 or less. This variant has a maximum SpliceAI delta score of 0.71, which is above that threshold and does not support BP4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
For intronic variants, SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact with delta score <=0.1
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score: 0.71
  • BP4 threshold for intronic variants: <=0.1
Sources
evidence.json.results.spliceaicase_summary.compact_evidence.spliceaiMSH2/criteria.json
PS1 PS1 for non-canonical splice variants requires a previously established pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant affecting the same splice nucleotide with similar or worse splicing prediction. No such same-nucleotide precedent was identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Same non-canonical splice nucleotide as a confirmed Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic splice variant with similar or worse SpliceAI prediction
Evidence considered
  • No ClinVar record identified
  • No publications identified
  • No same-nucleotide VCEP precedent identified
Still missing
  • Established same-nucleotide pathogenic or likely pathogenic splice precedent
Sources
MSH2/criteria.jsonliterature_pass.jsonevidence.json.results.clinvar
BS1 BS1 requires a gnomAD v4 group maximum filtering allele frequency of at least 0.0001 and less than 0.001. This variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, so its frequency is below the BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering AF >=0.0001 and <0.001
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: absent
  • BS1 threshold: >=0.0001 and <0.001
Sources
evidence.json.results.gnomad.GNOMAD_V4_1MSH2/criteria.json
BA1 BA1 requires a gnomAD v4 group maximum filtering allele frequency of at least 0.001. This variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, so it is below the BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering AF >=0.001
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: absent
  • BA1 threshold: >=0.001
Sources
evidence.json.results.gnomad.GNOMAD_V4_1MSH2/criteria.json
PVS1 This variant is a non-canonical intronic duplication at c.793-11_794dup and is not a canonical +/-1,2 splice variant, nonsense variant, frameshift variant, or exon-level duplication. SpliceAI predicts a possible splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.71, but no constitutional RNA assay demonstrating a splice aberration with loss of the full-length transcript was identified, so current evidence does not meet the MSH2 VCEP PVS1 rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
For non-canonical splice variants, apply PVS1 only with qualifying constitutional RNA evidence demonstrating a pathogenic splice aberration
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 loss of function is an established disease mechanism
  • Generic PVS1 scaffold: not a default null-variant bucket
  • SpliceAI max delta score: 0.71
  • No RNA confirmation identified
Still missing
  • Constitutional RNA study showing variant-associated splice aberration and loss of full-length transcript
  • Independent confirmation if relying on a non-canonical splice defect
Sources
pvs1_gene_context.jsonpvs1_variant_assessment.jsonevidence.json.results.spliceaiMSH2/criteria.json

Not assessed · 9 · no assessment recorded

PP4 No colorectal or endometrial tumor MSI result, tumor genome result, or mismatch repair immunohistochemistry result was identified, so the MSH2-specific PP4 tumor criteria cannot be evaluated. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
1 CRC/Endometrial MSI-H tumor or loss of MMR protein expression consistent with the variant location
Evidence considered
  • No tumor MSI/IHC evidence was provided
  • No relevant publications were identified
Still missing
  • Tumor MSI and/or IHC results consistent with MSH2 deficiency
Sources
case_summary.compact_evidenceliterature_pass.json
BS4 No segregation studies or Bayes likelihood ratio data were identified, so lack of segregation with disease cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Lack of co-segregation with disease with combined Bayes Likelihood Ratio <=0.48
Evidence considered
  • No segregation data identified
  • No publications identified
Still missing
  • Pedigree-based segregation data with Bayes likelihood ratio
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.json
BS3 No RNA study showing no splicing abnormality and no calibrated functional assay showing benign function were identified, so BS3 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
No associated mRNA aberration for intronic variants or calibrated functional odds <=0.48
Evidence considered
  • No variant-specific functional or RNA publications identified
Still missing
  • Variant-specific constitutional RNA study with NMD inhibition
  • Variant-specific calibrated benign functional assay
Sources
vcep_materials.jsonliterature_pass.jsonMSH2/criteria.json
PS2 No de novo data, parental confirmation, or tumor evidence consistent with MSH2 deficiency were identified, so PS2 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
De novo points framework
Evidence considered
  • No de novo evidence identified
  • No tumor evidence identified
Still missing
  • Confirmed or assumed de novo data
  • Parental testing
  • Tumor MSI/IHC data
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.jsonMSH2/criteria.json
PP1 No family segregation data or Bayes likelihood ratio were identified, so co-segregation with disease cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Co-segregation with disease with combined Bayes Likelihood Ratio >2.08
Evidence considered
  • No segregation evidence identified
Still missing
  • Pedigree-based segregation data with Bayes likelihood ratio
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.jsonMSH2/criteria.json
BP5 No tumor profile inconsistent with MSH2-associated disease and no alternate molecular explanation for the phenotype were identified, so BP5 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Tumor evidence inconsistent with the gene demonstrating genetic variation or MLH1 methylation/BRAF pattern
Evidence considered
  • No tumor phenotype data identified
  • No alternate molecular diagnosis identified
Still missing
  • Tumor MSS/IHC data inconsistent with MSH2 deficiency
  • Evidence for alternate molecular etiology
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.jsonMSH2/criteria.json
PS3 No variant-specific calibrated functional assay, constitutional RNA assay showing a damaging splice defect, or monoallelic expression data were identified, so PS3 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Damaging functional evidence or qualifying RNA/monoallelic expression evidence
Evidence considered
  • No variant-specific functional or RNA publications identified
Still missing
  • Variant-specific calibrated damaging functional assay
  • Variant-specific constitutional RNA assay
  • Monoallelic expression data if available
Sources
vcep_materials.jsonliterature_pass.jsonMSH2/criteria.json
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with a known pathogenic MSH2 variant in an individual whose clinical features argue against constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, so BS2 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
In-trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic variant in a context arguing against CMMRD
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying in-trans co-occurrence data identified
  • No CMMRD clinical data identified
Still missing
  • Confirmed in-trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic MSH2 variant
  • Clinical data excluding CMMRD
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.jsonMSH2/criteria.jsonvcep_materials.json
PM3 No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic MSH2 variant in an individual with clinical features consistent with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, so PM3 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Points-based in-trans evidence in a patient with clinical features consistent with CMMRD
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying in-trans CMMRD case data identified
Still missing
  • Confirmed in-trans co-occurrence with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic MSH2 variant
  • Clinical features consistent with CMMRD
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.jsonMSH2/criteria.jsonvcep_materials.json
Not applicable · 11· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
BP3 N/ABP3 is not used by the MSH2 VCEP for variant interpretation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks BP3 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
PM5 N/APM5 applies to missense substitutions at an amino acid residue with a different established pathogenic missense change. This variant is an intronic duplication and does not encode a missense substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence: p.?
  • Variant is intronic, not missense
Sources
case_summary.normalizationMSH2/criteria.json
BP2 N/ABP2 is not used by the MSH2 VCEP; BS2 is used instead for relevant co-occurrence evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks BP2 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
BP6 N/ABP6 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks BP6 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
PM1 N/APM1 is not used for MSH2 because the VCEP does not recognize mutational hot spots suitable for classification purposes. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks PM1 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.jsonvcep_materials.json
PP5 N/APP5 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks PP5 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
PM6 N/APM6 is marked not applicable by the MSH2 VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks PM6 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
PS4 N/APS4 is not used by the MSH2 VCEP because tumor evidence is incorporated through PP4 instead. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks PS4 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
PM4 N/APM4 is not used by the MSH2 VCEP for protein length changes from in-frame variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks PM4 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
BP1 N/ABP1 is not used by the MSH2 VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks BP1 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json
PP2 N/APP2 is not used by the MSH2 VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • MSH2 VCEP marks PP2 as not applicable
Sources
MSH2/criteria.json

Identifiers

Gene
MSH2
Transcript
NM_000251.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000251.3:c.793-11_794dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000242.1:p.?
GRCh38
chr2:47414256 T>TTCTTAATTTTAGG
GRCh37
chr2:47641395 T>TTCTTAATTTTAGG

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MSH2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000251.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MSH2NM_000251.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 SupportingSpliceAI predicts a splice defect with a maximum delta score of 0.71, which is above the MSH2 PP3 threshold of 0.2 for non-canonical splice nucleotides and supports a predicted splicing impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Predicted splice defect for non-canonical splicing nucleotides using SpliceAI with delta score >=0.2
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI DS_AG: 0.71
  • SpliceAI max delta score: 0.71
  • PP3 threshold for non-canonical splice variants: >=0.2
Sources
evidence.json.results.spliceaicase_summary.compact_evidence.spliceaiMSH2/criteria.json
BP7 This intronic duplication is located at c.793-11_794dup, which is 11 nucleotides upstream of the exon boundary. This does not meet the MSH2 BP7 positional requirement of at or beyond -21 in the intron. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
A synonymous or intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7
Evidence considered
  • Variant position: c.793-11_794dup
  • BP7 threshold for intronic variants: at or beyond -21
Sources
prefetch.normalize.variant_validatorMSH2/criteria.json
BP4 For intronic variants, BP4 requires SpliceAI to predict no splicing impact with a delta score of 0.1 or less. This variant has a maximum SpliceAI delta score of 0.71, which is above that threshold and does not support BP4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
For intronic variants, SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact with delta score <=0.1
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score: 0.71
  • BP4 threshold for intronic variants: <=0.1
Sources
evidence.json.results.spliceaicase_summary.compact_evidence.spliceaiMSH2/criteria.json

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.71).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.71).

Somatic

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).