0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

PTEN c.367C>G, p.(His123Asp)

NM_000314.8:c.367C>G NP_000305.3:p.(His123Asp) View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About PTEN

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 7 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 7
PS3Moderate
PS3 · moderate

In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay, p.His123Asp had a cumulative fitness score of -4.3458 with a high-confidence result flag, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PS3_Moderate threshold of <= -1.11 and supports a damaging effect on PTEN function.

PM1Moderate
PM1 · moderate

This missense variant affects codon 123, which lies within the PTEN catalytic motif spanning residues 123-130 defined by the PTEN Expert Panel as a critical functional region for PM1.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PM2 threshold of <0.00001 (0.001%) and supports rarity in population databases.

PM5Moderate
PM5 · moderate

A different missense change at the same residue, PTEN p.His123Arg, is established as pathogenic by expert panel review in ClinVar. The observed substitution p.His123Asp has a BLOSUM62 score of -1, which is equal to or more deleterious than the comparator p.His123Arg score of 0, meeting the PTEN Expert Panel PM5 rule.

PP2Supporting
PP2 · supporting

This is a missense variant in PTEN, a gene for which the PTEN Expert Panel permits PP2 because missense variation is a recognized disease mechanism and benign missense variation is comparatively constrained.

PP3Supporting
PP3 · supporting

REVEL is 0.98, which is above the PTEN Expert Panel PP3 threshold of >0.7 and supports a deleterious missense effect. BayesDel is also positive at 0.601229, while SpliceAI shows a low maximum delta score of 0.01, which does not suggest a splice effect.

PP5Supporting
PP5 · supporting

Expert panel Clingen PTEN Variant Curation Expert Panel, Clingen classified as Pathogenic.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v3.2.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule13 (Pathogenic.Moderate >=3) with applied criteria: PS3 moderate, PM1 moderate, PM2 supporting, PM5 moderate, PP2 supporting, PP3 supporting, PP5 supporting; maps to Likely Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

SpliceAI score
0.010 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.010. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
3 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV64294365, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 7 met · 5 not met · 8 not assessed · 8 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The PTEN c.367C>G (p.His123Asp) variant has been observed in somatic cancers (COSMIC COSV64294365, n=3) and has been reported in ClinVar, including a pathogenic expert-panel classification.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PM2 threshold for population rarity.

In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay, p.His123Asp showed a high-confidence damaging result with cumulative fitness score -4.3458, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PS3_Moderate threshold of <= -1.11.

Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, with REVEL 0.98 above the PTEN Expert Panel PP3 threshold of >0.7 and BayesDel 0.601229 positive, while SpliceAI max delta 0.01 does not suggest splice disruption.

This variant also affects a PTEN catalytic motif residue and a different missense change at the same codon has been established as pathogenic, supporting PM1 and PM5 under the PTEN specification.

Met · 7

PS3 ModerateIn the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay, p.His123Asp had a cumulative fitness score of -4.3458 with a high-confidence result flag, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PS3_Moderate threshold of <= -1.11 and supports a damaging effect on PTEN function. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN EP: apply PS3_Moderate when phosphatase activity score is <= -1.11 per Mighell et al. 2018.
Evidence considered
  • mmc2 Table S2: H123D
  • Cum_score -4.345802175
  • High_conf true
Sources
PM1 ModerateThis missense variant affects codon 123, which lies within the PTEN catalytic motif spanning residues 123-130 defined by the PTEN Expert Panel as a critical functional region for PM1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain; PTEN catalytic motifs include residues 90-94, 123-130, and 166-168.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP catalytic motif includes residues 123-130
Sources
PM2 SupportingThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PM2 threshold of <0.00001 (0.001%) and supports rarity in population databases. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN EP: PM2_Supporting when allele frequency is <0.00001 and subpopulation criteria are satisfied.
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
  • Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0
Sources
PM5 ModerateA different missense change at the same residue, PTEN p.His123Arg, is established as pathogenic by expert panel review in ClinVar. The observed substitution p.His123Asp has a BLOSUM62 score of -1, which is equal to or more deleterious than the comparator p.His123Arg score of 0, meeting the PTEN Expert Panel PM5 rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense change has been seen before, with BLOSUM62 score equal to or less than the known variant.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar VCV000007816 p.His123Arg reviewed by expert panel as pathogenic
  • BLOSUM62 H->D = -1 and H->R = 0
Sources
PP2 SupportingThis is a missense variant in PTEN, a gene for which the PTEN Expert Panel permits PP2 because missense variation is a recognized disease mechanism and benign missense variation is comparatively constrained. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Missense variant in a gene with low benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP PP2 specification
Sources
PP3 SupportingREVEL is 0.98, which is above the PTEN Expert Panel PP3 threshold of >0.7 and supports a deleterious missense effect. BayesDel is also positive at 0.601229, while SpliceAI shows a low maximum delta score of 0.01, which does not suggest a splice effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN EP: PP3 for missense variants when REVEL score is >0.7.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.98
  • BayesDel 0.601229
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
Sources
PP5 SupportingExpert panel Clingen PTEN Variant Curation Expert Panel, Clingen classified as Pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP marks PP5 not applicable
  • ClinVar expert panel classification
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 No evidence was identified that this nucleotide change produces the same amino acid substitution as a previously established pathogenic variant through a different DNA change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar exact variant record reviewed
Sources
BA1 This variant is absent from population databases and does not meet the PTEN Expert Panel BA1 threshold of >0.00056 (0.056%). Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BA1 when filtering allele frequency is >0.00056.
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD datasets
Sources
BS1 This variant is absent from population databases and does not meet the PTEN Expert Panel BS1 thresholds of 0.0000043 to 0.00056. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS1 when allele frequency is within the PTEN benign range.
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD datasets
Sources
BS3 Available functional evidence does not show preserved PTEN function. Instead, the PTEN phosphatase assay showed a damaging result with cumulative fitness score -4.3458, so BS3 is not supported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS3_Supporting for phosphatase activity >0 per Mighell et al. 2018.
Evidence considered
  • mmc2 Table S2: damaging functional result for H123D
Sources
BP4 Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. REVEL is 0.98, which is above the PTEN Expert Panel benign threshold of <0.5 for missense variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP4 for missense variants when REVEL score is <0.5.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.98
Sources

Not assessed · 8 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with documented maternity and paternity confirmation was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
De novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar literature trail reviewed for de novo leads
Still missing
  • Confirmed de novo case data with phenotype and parental testing
Sources
PS4 This variant has been reported in ClinVar and in somatic cancer databases, but no case-control enrichment data or PTEN Expert Panel phenotype specificity score was identified to support PS4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Requires PTEN phenotype specificity scoring or significant enrichment in affected individuals versus controls.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar pathogenic expert-panel record
  • COSMIC somatic count 3
Still missing
  • Quantified proband data or case-control enrichment meeting PTEN PS4 thresholds
Sources
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence with the required phenotype and family-history context was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Assumed de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar literature trail reviewed for de novo leads
Still missing
  • Documented assumed de novo case(s) meeting PTEN PM6 thresholds
Sources
PP1 No segregation data were identified to show co-segregation with disease across informative meioses. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Requires co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members.
Evidence considered
  • No segregation evidence identified in reviewed materials
Still missing
  • Family segregation data with informative meiosis count
Sources
BS2 No homozygous observations in healthy or PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome-unaffected individuals were identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Observed in the homozygous state in a healthy or unaffected individual.
Evidence considered
  • No homozygous population observations identified
Still missing
  • Documented homozygous observations with unaffected status
Sources
BS4 No data were identified showing lack of segregation in one or more affected families. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Requires lack of segregation in affected family members.
Evidence considered
  • No anti-segregation evidence identified
Still missing
  • Family data demonstrating lack of segregation
Sources
BP2 No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant or recurrently in cis/phase unknown with pathogenic PTEN variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Observed in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant or repeatedly in cis/phase unknown with pathogenic PTEN variants.
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying phase evidence identified
Still missing
  • Phase data with another pathogenic PTEN variant
Sources
BP5 No alternate highly penetrant molecular explanation with non-overlapping phenotype was identified to support BP5. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease and no phenotype overlap with PTEN.
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying alternate-diagnosis evidence identified
Still missing
  • Documented alternate molecular diagnosis with non-overlapping phenotype
Sources
Not applicable · 8· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/AThis is a missense variant, not a nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/-1 or 2 splice, or exon-level loss-of-function event, so the PTEN-specific PVS1 decision tree does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Use PTEN PVS1 decision tree for null/splice/CNV variants only.
Evidence considered
  • NM_000314.8:c.367C>G predicts p.(His123Asp)
  • PTEN PVS1 framework is limited to null/splice/CNV contexts
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentvcep_pvs1_decisiontree_pten
PM3 VCEPPM3 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework for this disorder context. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP marks PM3 not applicable
Sources
PM4 N/AThis variant does not cause an in-frame insertion, in-frame deletion, or stop-loss event, so PM4 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Applies to protein length changes due to in-frame indels or stop-loss variants.
Evidence considered
  • Variant is a missense substitution
Sources
PP4 VCEPPP4 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework because phenotype specificity is incorporated into PS4 scoring. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP marks PP4 not applicable
Sources
BP1 VCEPBP1 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP marks BP1 not applicable
Sources
BP3 VCEPBP3 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP marks BP3 not applicable
Sources
BP6 VCEPBP6 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PTEN EP marks BP6 not applicable
Sources
BP7 N/AThis is not a synonymous or qualifying deep intronic variant, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Applies to synonymous or intronic variants at or beyond +7/-21 with no predicted splice impact.
Evidence considered
  • Variant is missense
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000314.8:c.367C>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000305.3:p.(His123Asp)
GRCh38
chr10:87933126 C>G
GRCh37
chr10:89692883 C>G
ClinVar
428277
COSMIC
COSV64294365

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in PTEN, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000314.8. Select a row to find it on the plot.

PTENNM_000314.8
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -5 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -131 bp
0.010
SpliceAI donor lossat +3 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +125 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.000
Pangolin splice gain
0.010

Other predictors

REVEL
0.980
BayesDel
0.601

How the predictions were used

PP3 SupportingREVEL is 0.98, which is above the PTEN Expert Panel PP3 threshold of >0.7 and supports a deleterious missense effect. BayesDel is also positive at 0.601229, while SpliceAI shows a low maximum delta score of 0.01, which does not suggest a splice effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN EP: PP3 for missense variants when REVEL score is >0.7.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.98
  • BayesDel 0.601229
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
Sources
BP4 Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. REVEL is 0.98, which is above the PTEN Expert Panel benign threshold of <0.5 for missense variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BP4 for missense variants when REVEL score is <0.5.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL 0.98
Sources
BP7 N/AThis is not a synonymous or qualifying deep intronic variant, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Applies to synonymous or intronic variants at or beyond +7/-21 with no predicted splice impact.
Evidence considered
  • Variant is missense
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.98. BayesDel score = 0.601229.

7 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • PTEN mutations in eight Spanish families and one Brazilian family with Cowden syndrome.
    Bussaglia E et al. · 2002
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 11918710 ↗
  • A comprehensive functional analysis of PTEN mutations: implications in tumor- and autism-related syndromes.
    Rodríguez-Escudero I et al. · 2011
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 21828076 ↗
  • Crystal structure of the PTEN tumor suppressor: implications for its phosphoinositide phosphatase activity and membrane association.
    Lee JO et al. · 1999
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 10555148 ↗
  • Cell cycle arrest by the PTEN tumor suppressor is target cell specific and may require protein phosphatase activity.
    Hlobilkova A et al. · 2000
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 10772829 ↗
  • Tumour suppressor PTEN regulates cell cycle and protein kinase B/Akt pathway in breast cancer cells.
    Hlobilkova A et al. · 2006
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 16619501 ↗
  • ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25645574 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (3 clinical laboratories) and as Pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory) and as Pathogenic by Clingen PTEN Variant Curation Expert Panel, Clingen (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 428277)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.98. BayesDel score = 0.601229.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV64294365, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.