Reasoning
The PTEN Expert Panel framework permits PS4 from a case-control study showing odds ratio >2 for a PHTS component phenotype with p<0.05 and a 95% confidence-interval lower limit >1.5, or from phenotype-specificity scores accumulated across independent probands: Very Strong at >=16, Strong at 4-15.5, Moderate at 2-3.5, and Supporting at 1-1.5. The available case evidence contains no case-control counts, odds ratio, p-value, confidence interval, Cleveland Clinic scores, pediatric phenotype scores, or independent proband series for NM_000314.8:c.521del. The two fetched publications do not mention this variant, and the PTEN specification states that PS4 cannot be combined with PP4. Therefore PS4 cannot be adjudicated from the available evidence; no numeric comparison is applicable.
Rule
PTEN PS4: case-control OR >2 with p<0.05 and 95% CI lower limit >1.5; alternatively, phenotype-specificity score >=16 (Very Strong), 4-15.5 (Strong), 2-3.5 (Moderate), or 1-1.5 (Supporting). PS4 may not be combined with PP4.
Evidence considered
- The PTEN Expert Panel source states that a case-control PS4 analysis may use odds ratio >2, p<0.05, and a 95% confidence-interval lower limit >1.5; its phenotype-specificity thresholds are >=16 for Very Strong, 4-15.5 for Strong, 2-3.5 for Moderate, and 1-1.5 for Supporting.
- No variant-specific case-control data, phenotype-specificity score, or independent proband series for NM_000314.8:c.521del is present in the reviewed evidence.
- The reviewed full-text publications do not mention c.521del or p.(Y174Lfs*9).
Still missing
- Variant-specific case-control counts or a sufficiently powered affected-versus-control enrichment analysis.
- Variant-specific Cleveland Clinic or pediatric phenotype scores from independent probands.
Sources