0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

PTEN c.525del, p.(Tyr176IlefsTer7)

NM_000314.8:c.525del NP_000305.3:p.(Tyr176IlefsTer7) View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About PTEN

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

This frameshift variant, c.525del (p.Tyr176IlefsTer7), is predicted to introduce a premature termination codon well 5' of the PTEN-specific p.D375 (c.1121) threshold in biologically relevant transcript NM_000314.8, which is consistent with loss of function as an established disease mechanism for PTEN; under the PTEN PVS1 decision tree, this supports PVS1 at very strong strength.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the PTEN PM2 threshold of 0.00001 (0.001%) and supports PM2 at supporting strength.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v3.2.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule20 (1 Pathogenic.Very Strong + 1 Pathogenic.Supporting) with applied criteria: PVS1 very strong, PM2 supporting; maps to Likely Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 3 not met · 7 not assessed · 16 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The PTEN c.525del (p.Tyr176IlefsTer7; p.Y176Ifs*7) variant has not been observed in COSMIC, has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic by one clinical laboratory, and is listed in OncoKB as Likely Oncogenic with a likely loss-of-function effect.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the PTEN PM2 threshold of 0.00001 (0.001%) and supports PM2 at supporting strength.

This deletion causes a frameshift with premature termination at codon 176 and falls 5' of the PTEN-specific p.D375 (c.1121) PVS1 threshold in transcript NM_000314.8, supporting PVS1 as a loss-of-function variant in a gene where loss of function is an established disease mechanism.

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, so no separate computational splice criterion is added.

Met · 2

PVS1 Very strongThis frameshift variant, c.525del (p.Tyr176IlefsTer7), is predicted to introduce a premature termination codon well 5' of the PTEN-specific p.D375 (c.1121) threshold in biologically relevant transcript NM_000314.8, which is consistent with loss of function as an established disease mechanism for PTEN; under the PTEN PVS1 decision tree, this supports PVS1 at very strong strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PVS1 decision tree: frameshift with stop codon/disruption at or 5' to p.D375 (c.1121) in NM_000314.8 => PVS1
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC v3.2.0 directs use of the PTEN PVS1 decision tree
  • PTEN decision tree assigns PVS1 to nonsense/frameshift variants at or 5' to p.D375 (c.1121) in NM_000314.8
  • Gene-level context supports PTEN loss of function as an established germline disease mechanism
  • Variant-level assessment identifies this change as a frameshift with p.(Y176Ifs*7)
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_pvs1_decisiontree_ptenpvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessment
PM2 SupportingThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the PTEN PM2 threshold of 0.00001 (0.001%) and supports PM2 at supporting strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM2_Supporting: absent or <0.00001 in population databases
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
  • PTEN CSPEC PM2 threshold is <0.00001 (0.001%)
Sources

Not met · 3 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS4 This variant has been reported in ClinVar, but the available evidence does not provide the PTEN-specific proband scoring, case counts, or case-control enrichment required to apply PS4 at any strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS4
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar reports one pathogenic submission
  • No proband specificity score or enrichment calculation was available
Still missing
  • PTEN-specific proband specificity score or case-control enrichment data
Sources
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not exceed the PTEN BA1 threshold of 0.00056 (0.056%). Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BA1
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
  • PTEN CSPEC BA1 threshold is >0.00056 (0.056%)
Sources
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not fall within the PTEN BS1 supporting range of 0.0000043-0.000043 or the strong range of 0.000043-0.00056. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS1
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
  • PTEN CSPEC BS1 supporting range is 0.0000043-0.000043 and strong range is 0.000043-0.00056
Sources

Not assessed · 7 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity and paternity established was identified, so PS2 cannot be applied from the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS2
Evidence considered
  • No de novo data were provided in the available evidence sources
Still missing
  • Documented de novo occurrence with confirmed parentage in an affected individual
Sources
PM6 No assumed or confirmed de novo occurrence without family history was identified, so PM6 cannot be applied from the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM6
Evidence considered
  • No de novo evidence was available in the reviewed sources
Still missing
  • Documented assumed or confirmed de novo occurrence in an affected individual without family history
Sources
PP1 No segregation data were identified, so PP1 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP1
Evidence considered
  • No family segregation data were available
Still missing
  • Segregation data showing co-segregation across informative meioses
Sources
BS2 No homozygous observation in a healthy or PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome-unaffected individual was identified, so BS2 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS2
Evidence considered
  • Variant was absent from available population datasets
  • No unaffected homozygous observations were provided
Still missing
  • Documented homozygous observation in an unaffected individual
Sources
BS4 No lack-of-segregation evidence from one or more families was identified, so BS4 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS4
Evidence considered
  • No family non-segregation data were available
Still missing
  • Documented non-segregation in affected family members
Sources
BP2 No phase data showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant or repeated cis/phase-unknown observations with pathogenic PTEN variants were identified, so BP2 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP2
Evidence considered
  • No compound genotype or phase evidence was available
Still missing
  • Phase data with another pathogenic or likely pathogenic PTEN variant
Sources
BP5 No alternate highly penetrant molecular diagnosis with non-overlapping phenotype was identified, so BP5 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP5
Evidence considered
  • No alternate molecular diagnosis information was available
Still missing
  • Documented alternate molecular basis for disease with no phenotypic overlap
Sources
Not applicable · 16· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/APS1 applies to the same amino acid substitution as a previously established pathogenic variant or an equivalent pathogenic splicing change; this variant is a frameshift and does not meet that rule type. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS1
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC PS1 is defined for same amino acid change or equivalent pathogenic splicing variant
Sources
PS3 N/ANo PTEN functional assay result specific to this frameshift variant was identified. The indexed PTEN functional dataset used for PS3/BS3 is a missense phosphatase assay resource and does not provide applicable evidence for this deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS3
Evidence considered
  • PTEN mmc2 functional resource is indexed for missense variants
  • No variant-specific RNA or protein functional assay was identified for c.525del
Still missing
  • Variant-specific functional evidence
  • such as an RNA or protein assay applicable to this frameshift change
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_mmc2
PM1 N/APM1 in the PTEN specification is defined for variants in established catalytic motifs at residues 90-94, 123-130, and 166-168. This frameshift occurs at Tyr176, outside those defined motifs, and is more appropriately evaluated under PVS1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM1
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC PM1 motifs are residues 90-94
  • 123-130
  • and 166-168
  • Cancer Hotspots did not identify a statistically significant hotspot for Y176
Sources
PM3 N/APM3 is not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM3
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC lists PM3 as not applicable
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 in the PTEN specification applies to in-frame insertions/deletions and stop-loss variants. This variant is a frameshift, so PM4 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM4
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC PM4 is limited to in-frame indels and stop-loss variants
Sources
PM5 N/APM5 applies to a missense change at a residue where a different pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense change has been established. This variant is a frameshift and does not meet that rule type. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM5
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC PM5 is defined for missense variants
Sources
PP2 N/APP2 is a missense-specific rule, and this variant is a frameshift. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP2
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC PP2 is defined for missense variants
Sources
PP3 N/ASpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score 0.02), and the PTEN PP3 rule for splicing variants requires concordant splice prediction evidence. Because this is a frameshift variant already evaluated under PVS1 and no concordant splicing evidence was identified, PP3 is not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP3
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.02
  • PTEN CSPEC PP3 for splicing variants requires concordant splice prediction evidence
Still missing
  • Concordant splice prediction evidence or other applicable computational evidence meeting PTEN PP3 requirements
Sources
PP4 N/APP4 is not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP4
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC lists PP4 as not applicable
Sources
PP5 N/APP5 is not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP5
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC lists PP5 as not applicable
Sources
BS3 N/ANo PTEN functional study showing no damaging effect for this frameshift variant was identified. The indexed PTEN functional assay resource applies to missense variants and does not support BS3 for this deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS3
Evidence considered
  • PTEN mmc2 functional resource is indexed for missense variants
  • No benign functional study specific to c.525del was identified
Still missing
  • Variant-specific functional evidence showing no damaging effect
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_mmc2
BP1 N/ABP1 is not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP1
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC lists BP1 as not applicable
Sources
BP3 N/ABP3 is not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP3
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC lists BP3 as not applicable
Sources
BP4 N/ASpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score 0.02), but PTEN BP4 for splicing variants requires concordant computational evidence and this frameshift is not otherwise an appropriate BP4 rule type; therefore BP4 is not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP4
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.02
  • PTEN CSPEC BP4 for splicing variants requires concordant prediction evidence
Still missing
  • Concordant computational evidence meeting PTEN BP4 requirements for an applicable variant type
Sources
BP6 N/ABP6 is not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP6
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC lists BP6 as not applicable
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is limited to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants with no predicted splicing effect. This variant is a coding frameshift deletion, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP7
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC BP7 applies to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants
  • This variant is a coding frameshift deletion
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000314.8:c.525del
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000305.3:p.(Tyr176IlefsTer7)
GRCh38
chr10:87952149 TG>T
GRCh37
chr10:89711906 TG>T

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in PTEN, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000314.8. Select a row to find it on the plot.

PTENNM_000314.8
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/ASpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score 0.02), and the PTEN PP3 rule for splicing variants requires concordant splice prediction evidence. Because this is a frameshift variant already evaluated under PVS1 and no concordant splicing evidence was identified, PP3 is not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP3
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.02
  • PTEN CSPEC PP3 for splicing variants requires concordant splice prediction evidence
Still missing
  • Concordant splice prediction evidence or other applicable computational evidence meeting PTEN PP3 requirements
Sources
BP4 N/ASpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score 0.02), but PTEN BP4 for splicing variants requires concordant computational evidence and this frameshift is not otherwise an appropriate BP4 rule type; therefore BP4 is not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP4
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.02
  • PTEN CSPEC BP4 for splicing variants requires concordant prediction evidence
Still missing
  • Concordant computational evidence meeting PTEN BP4 requirements for an applicable variant type
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is limited to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants with no predicted splicing effect. This variant is a coding frameshift deletion, so BP7 does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP7
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC BP7 applies to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants
  • This variant is a coding frameshift deletion
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory).

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

Functional

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.