About PTEN
No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
No variant summary was recorded for this case.
Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.
Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
The recorded framework is ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes), gnomAD v4.1 (exomes), and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (genomes). Allele frequency is below the PTEN VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of <0.00001 (0.001%).
PTEN has a low rate of benign missense variation and missense variants are a common mechanism of disease (PHTS, autosomal dominant). This is a missense variant (Pro213Arg). Per PTEN VCEP v3.2.0, PP2_Supporting applies to missense variants in PTEN.
REVEL score is 0.868, exceeding the PTEN VCEP PP3 threshold of >0.7 for missense variants. This represents multiple lines of computational evidence (conservation, biochemical properties, and ensemble prediction) supporting a deleterious effect.
No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.
Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v3.2.0 criteria-combination framework was evaluated deterministically with applied criteria: PM2 supporting, PP2 supporting, PP3 supporting; no rule matched the adjudicated criteria.
Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.
gnomAD v4.1 allele counts were not recorded for this variant.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.050. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.
A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. PTEN, a lipid and protein phosphatase, is one of the most frequently mutated genes in cancer.
This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV64295816, n = 1 times).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0, with the data and sources behind each one.
29 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 11 not met · 5 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
NM_000314.8:c.638C>G (p.Pro213Arg) is absent from all queried population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, Canada), meeting PM2_Supporting per PTEN VCEP v3.2.0.
PP2_Supporting is applied: this is a missense variant in PTEN, a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation where missense variants are a common disease mechanism per PTEN VCEP.
PP3_Supporting is applied: REVEL score 0.868 exceeds the PTEN VCEP threshold of >0.7 for missense variants, supporting a deleterious computational prediction.
PS3 was not met: the variant was not directly measured in the Mighell et al. 2018 phosphatase activity assay (Cum_score=NA), and the imputed score (−0.629) does not meet the PS3_Moderate threshold of ≤−1.11. No other variant-specific functional studies were identified.
PM1 was not met: codon 213 lies outside the VCEP-defined catalytic motifs (residues 90-94, 123-130, 166-168). No statistically significant hotspot was identified at this residue.
PVS1 is not applicable: the PTEN PVS1 decision tree is restricted to null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice site disruptions, exon deletions); missense substitutions are not within scope.
Remaining pathogenic criteria (PS1, PS2, PS4, PS5, PM5, PM6, PP1, PP4, PP5) and benign criteria (BA1, BS1-BS4, BP1-BP7) are either not met, not assessed due to absent data, or not applicable per PTEN VCEP v3.2.0.
Total evidence: PM2_Supporting + PP2_Supporting + PP3_Supporting. Per the PTEN VCEP classification rules (Richards et al. 2015 combination framework), this does not meet any pathogenic or likely pathogenic rule: Rule 4 requires one very strong criterion plus ≥2 supporting, which is not satisfied. The evidence is insufficient for classification beyond Variant of Uncertain Significance.
No criteria match.
No further detail was recorded.
No further detail was recorded.
Every interpreted variant in PTEN, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000314.8. Select a row to find it on the plot.
| Protein | Location | Classification | Link |
|---|
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.05). REVEL score = 0.868. BayesDel score = 0.341906.
0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.
Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.05). REVEL score = 0.868. BayesDel score = 0.341906.
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. PTEN, a lipid and protein phosphatase, is one of the most frequently mutated genes in cancer.
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV64295816, n = 1 times).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.