0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

PTEN c.63C>T, p.(Phe21=)

NM_000314.8:c.63C>T NP_000305.3:p.(Phe21=) View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About PTEN

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

The variant is essentially absent from population databases (gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 6.2e-7; 1/1,614,140 alleles, 0 homozygotes), below the PTEN VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of 0.001%.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP7Supporting
BP7 · supporting

Synonymous variant located outside the splice consensus region (c.63 in exon 1, 16 bp upstream of the exon 1 donor) with SpliceAI predicting no impact on splicing (max delta 0.116), meeting BP7 at supporting level.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for PTEN Version 3.2 v3.2 criteria-combination framework was evaluated deterministically with applied criteria: PM2 supporting, BP7 supporting benign; no rule matched the adjudicated criteria.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

SpliceAI score
0.116 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.116. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
4 reported laboratory submissions

3 Likely benign · 1 Benign. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2, with the data and sources behind each one.

29 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 15 not met · 0 not assessed · 12 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

NM_000314.8:c.63C>T is a synonymous substitution (NP_000305.3:p.Phe21=) in PTEN exon 1 that does not alter the encoded amino acid sequence.

SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact (max delta score 0.116), supporting BP7 at supporting strength for a synonymous variant located outside the splice consensus region.

The variant is essentially absent from population databases (gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 6.2e-7, 1/1,614,140 alleles, 0 homozygotes), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.

ClinVar reports the variant as Likely benign (3 submitters) and Benign (1 submitter) under a single-submitter, non-expert-panel review status; PP5 and BP6 are not applicable under the PTEN VCEP.

With only PM2_Supporting and BP7 met and no strong or moderate criteria satisfied, the variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingThe variant is essentially absent from population databases (gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 6.2e-7; 1/1,614,140 alleles, 0 homozygotes), below the PTEN VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of 0.001%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 6.2e-7 (1/1
  • 614
  • 140 alleles)
  • absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada
Sources
BP7 SupportingSynonymous variant located outside the splice consensus region (c.63 in exon 1, 16 bp upstream of the exon 1 donor) with SpliceAI predicting no impact on splicing (max delta 0.116), meeting BP7 at supporting level. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.116 (no predicted splice impact)
  • synonymous variant outside +7/-21 splice region
Sources

Not met · 15 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS2 No de novo (maternity and paternity confirmed) observation of this variant has been reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No de novo observation reported
PS3 No RNA, mini-gene, or other splicing assay demonstrates a damaging effect, and the variant is synonymous and absent from the Mighell et al. missense saturation mutagenesis dataset (mmc2.xlsx covers missense variants only). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact
  • no variant-specific functional assay
  • mmc2.xlsx is missense-only
Still missing
  • No variant-specific functional assay
Sources
vcep_mmc2
PS4 No proband specificity score, case-control prevalence data, or variant-specific proband observations are available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No proband case data
PM1 Residue 21 lies outside the PTEN catalytic motifs (WPD loop 90-94, P-loop 123-130, TI-loop 166-168), and the synonymous change does not alter these domains. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Residue 21 is not within catalytic motifs 90-94
  • 123-130
  • or 166-168
Sources
PM6 No assumed de novo observation of this variant has been reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No assumed de novo observation reported
PP1 No co-segregation data in affected family members are available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No segregation data
PP3 SpliceAI (max delta 0.116) predicts no splicing impact, and REVEL/BayesDel are not applicable to a synonymous variant; no concordant computational evidence of a deleterious effect is present. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.116 (no predicted splicing impact)
Sources
BA1 gnomAD filtering allele frequency (6.2e-7) is far below the BA1 stand-alone threshold (>0.056%). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 6.2e-7
Sources
BS1 gnomAD allele frequency (6.2e-7) is below the BS1_Supporting threshold (>=0.00043%). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 6.2e-7
Sources
BS2 No homozygous observation in healthy or PHTS-unaffected individuals (gnomAD homozygote count = 0). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 homozygotes = 0
Sources
BS3 No RNA, mini-gene, or other splicing assay demonstrates absence of splicing impact; computational prediction alone does not satisfy BS3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No functional splicing assay data
BS4 No family data demonstrate lack of segregation with disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No segregation data
BP2 No observation in trans with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic PTEN variant, nor three observations in cis or phase-unknown with different pathogenic/likely pathogenic PTEN variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No phase information with a pathogenic PTEN variant
BP4 SpliceAI (max delta 0.116) is within the benign range (0-0.2), but the PTEN VCEP BP4 rule requires concordance of SpliceAI AND VarSeak; VarSeak data are unavailable. BP7 is applied instead to avoid double-counting. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.116 (benign range)
  • VarSeak not available
Still missing
  • VarSeak splice prediction not available for concordance
Sources
BP5 No case with an alternate molecular basis for disease has been reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No alternate-molecular-basis case data
Not applicable · 12· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANM_000314.8:c.63C>T is a synonymous substitution (p.Phe21=) and does not create a null allele (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, or initiation-codon variant), so the PTEN PVS1 decision tree does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous variant p.Phe21=
  • not a null variant
Sources
pvs1_variant_assessmentpvs1_gene_context
PS1 N/AA synonymous change does not alter the amino acid, so there is no established pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change, and no established pathogenic splicing variant occurs at this nucleotide position. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No amino acid change
  • no pathogenic splicing comparator at this position
PM3 VCEPRecessive trans-phase criterion; PTEN is autosomal dominant and PM3 is Not Applicable per the VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PM4 N/AProtein-length-change (in-frame indel / stop-loss) criterion; not applicable to a synonymous substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM5 N/AThe synonymous variant (p.Phe21=) is not a missense change at a residue with an established pathogenic missense comparator. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is not missense-like
  • no same-residue comparator
Sources
pm5_candidates
PP2 N/APP2 applies to missense variants in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation; this is a synonymous variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous variant
  • not missense
Sources
PP4 VCEPThe ClinGen PTEN VCEP specifies PP4 as Not Applicable (phenotype specificity is incorporated into the PS4 rule specifications). Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
PP5 VCEPThe ClinGen PTEN VCEP specifies PP5 as Not Applicable, and the ClinVar review status is single-submitter (not a 3-star expert panel). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar review status 'criteria provided
  • single submitter'
  • no expert panel
Sources
BP1 VCEPThe ClinGen PTEN VCEP specifies BP1 as Not Applicable (PTEN disease is not primarily caused by truncating variants). Details ▾Hide ▴
Sources
BP3 VCEPIn-frame indel / repeat-region criterion; not applicable to a single-nucleotide substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP6 VCEPThe ClinGen PTEN VCEP specifies BP6 as Not Applicable, and the ClinVar review status is single-submitter (not a 3-star expert panel). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar review status 'criteria provided
  • single submitter'
  • no expert panel
Sources
PS5 N/APS5 is not defined in the ClinGen PTEN VCEP framework and is not a standard ACMG/AMP criterion. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

Identifiers

Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000314.8:c.63C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000305.3:p.(Phe21=)
GRCh38
chr10:87864532 C>T
GRCh37
chr10:89624289 C>T
ClinVar
927285, 488925

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in PTEN, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000314.8. Select a row to find it on the plot.

PTENNM_000314.8
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 1 / 1,614,140 alleles AF 6.2e-07 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 6.2e-07 · 1 / 1,614,140 alleles · 0 hom
European (non-Finnish)1 / 1,179,974 8.5e-07
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19525e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1614140 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.47476e-07; MAF= 0.00008%, 1/1179974 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +92 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -72 bp
0.019
SpliceAI donor lossat +16 bp
0.116
SpliceAI donor gainat +105 bp
0.052
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.138
Pangolin splice gain
0.007

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP7 SupportingSynonymous variant located outside the splice consensus region (c.63 in exon 1, 16 bp upstream of the exon 1 donor) with SpliceAI predicting no impact on splicing (max delta 0.116), meeting BP7 at supporting level. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.116 (no predicted splice impact)
  • synonymous variant outside +7/-21 splice region
Sources
PP3 SpliceAI (max delta 0.116) predicts no splicing impact, and REVEL/BayesDel are not applicable to a synonymous variant; no concordant computational evidence of a deleterious effect is present. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.116 (no predicted splicing impact)
Sources
BP4 SpliceAI (max delta 0.116) is within the benign range (0-0.2), but the PTEN VCEP BP4 rule requires concordance of SpliceAI AND VarSeak; VarSeak data are unavailable. BP7 is applied instead to avoid double-counting. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.116 (benign range)
  • VarSeak not available
Still missing
  • VarSeak splice prediction not available for concordance
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.12).

7 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.
    Syngal S et al. · 2015
    ACG clinical guideline on genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes, including Cowden syndrome/PTEN. Gene-level management recommendations; NM_000314.8:c.63C>T is not discussed.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25645574 ↗
  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    ACMG/AMP standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. Provides the general classification framework; does not discuss this specific variant.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.
    Saslow D et al. · 2007
    American Cancer Society guidelines for breast MRI screening as an adjunct to mammography. Cancer screening recommendations at the gene level; NM_000314.8:c.63C>T is not mentioned.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 17392385 ↗
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Expert Statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology expert statement on the collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers. No variant-level data; NM_000314.8:c.63C>T is not mentioned.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 24493721 ↗
  • ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing.
    ACMG Board of Directors · 2015
    ACMG policy statement on updated recommendations for reporting secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Policy-level guidance; NM_000314.8:c.63C>T is not mentioned.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25356965 ↗
  • Genetics of Colorectal Cancer (PDQ®): Health Professional Version.
    PDQ Cancer Genetics Editorial Board · 2002
    PDQ Genetics of Colorectal Cancer (Health Professional Version). Gene-level review of hereditary colorectal cancer; NM_000314.8:c.63C>T is not mentioned.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 26389505 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    Sherloc refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. Methodological framework; NM_000314.8:c.63C>T is not mentioned.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19525e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1614140 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.47476e-07; MAF= 0.00008%, 1/1179974 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (3 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 927285)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.12).

Functional

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.