0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

PTEN c.70G>A, p.(Asp24Asn)

NM_000314.8:c.70G>A NP_000305.3:p.(Asp24Asn) View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About PTEN

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 4 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 4
PS3Moderate
PS3 · moderate

The PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay showed D24N with Cum_score -1.549791026 and High_conf true, which meets the PTEN VCEP threshold for PS3_Moderate (Cum_score <= -1.11).

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, satisfying the PTEN PM2_Supporting population criterion.

PP2Supporting
PP2 · supporting

This is a missense variant in PTEN, and PP2 is retained as an applicable PTEN missense-gene-level supporting criterion in the PTEN specification.

PP3Supporting
PP3 · supporting

The REVEL score is 0.753, exceeding the PTEN missense PP3 threshold of >0.7. SpliceAI shows no significant splice effect, but PP3 for PTEN missense variants is based on REVEL.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

PTEN CSPEC explicit final-classification framework from final_classification_framework.json (cspec_ruleset; criteria_combination; Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules).

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Context only
For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PTEN VCEP v3.2.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 4 met · 7 not met · 8 not assessed · 9 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The PTEN c.70G>A (p.Asp24Asn) variant has been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC (COSV64295411; 8 occurrences) and has been reported in ClinVar, where it is classified as pathogenic by three clinical laboratory submissions.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity in population databases.

Functional testing in the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay showed a high-confidence damaging result for D24N (Cum_score -1.549791026), which supports a deleterious effect on PTEN function.

Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect for this missense variant based on a REVEL score of 0.753, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (maximum delta score 0.02).

Met · 4

PS3 ModerateThe PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay showed D24N with Cum_score -1.549791026 and High_conf true, which meets the PTEN VCEP threshold for PS3_Moderate (Cum_score <= -1.11). Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS3_Moderate: phosphatase activity <= -1.11 per Mighell et al. 2018.
Evidence considered
  • mmc2.xlsx Table S2: D24N, Cum_score -1.549791026
  • High_conf: true (Pass SE Filter)
  • PTEN CSPEC PS3_Moderate threshold: phosphatase activity score <= -1.11
Sources
vcep_m_m_c_2PMID:29706350 ↗case_summary.json
PM2 SupportingThe variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, satisfying the PTEN PM2_Supporting population criterion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM2_Supporting: absent or below PTEN population thresholds in large population databases.
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
Sources
PP2 SupportingThis is a missense variant in PTEN, and PP2 is retained as an applicable PTEN missense-gene-level supporting criterion in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP2: missense variant in a gene with low benign missense variation and missense as a common disease mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • Variant class: missense
  • PTEN CSPEC includes PP2 for missense variants
Sources
case_summary.json
PP3 SupportingThe REVEL score is 0.753, exceeding the PTEN missense PP3 threshold of >0.7. SpliceAI shows no significant splice effect, but PP3 for PTEN missense variants is based on REVEL. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP3: missense variants with REVEL > 0.7.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score 0.753
  • PTEN CSPEC PP3 threshold for missense: REVEL > 0.7
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.02
Sources
case_summary.jsonspliceai ↗revel

Not met · 7 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 No evidence was identified for a different nucleotide change producing the same PTEN p.Asp24Asn amino acid substitution that has already been established as pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS1: same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Evidence considered
  • Table S3 includes PTEN c.70G>A (p.Asp24Asn) but no different nucleotide change yielding p.Asp24Asn
Still missing
  • No alternate nucleotide encoding p.Asp24Asn was identified in the reviewed local sources.
Sources
vcep_m_m_c_2clinvar ↗
PM1 PTEN residue Asp24 is outside the PTEN CSPEC-defined catalytic motif residues 90-94, 123-130, and 166-168 required for PM1. A Cancer Hotspots signal alone does not satisfy the PTEN-specific PM1 definition. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM1: only residues in catalytic motifs 90-94, 123-130, 166-168.
Evidence considered
  • Protein position: Asp24
  • PTEN PM1 restricted to catalytic motifs 90-94, 123-130, 166-168
  • Hotspot noted, but PTEN CSPEC PM1 is domain-restricted
Sources
case_summary.jsonclinvar ↗hotspotsPMID:17213812 ↗
PM5 Different missense changes at PTEN Asp24 are present in Table S3 and classified as pathogenic, including p.Asp24His, p.Asp24Tyr, and p.Asp24Gly; however, PM5 additionally requires the queried missense change to have a BLOSUM62 score equal to or less than the known variant. The queried D>N substitution has BLOSUM62 score 1, whereas D>H and D>G are -1 and D>Y is -3, so the PTEN PM5 requirement is not satisfied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM5: different pathogenic/likely pathogenic missense at same residue and queried variant must have BLOSUM62 score equal to or less than known variant.
Evidence considered
  • Table S3: c.70G>C p.Asp24His Pathogenic
  • Table S3: c.70G>T p.Asp24Tyr Pathogenic
  • Table S3: c.71A>G p.Asp24Gly Pathogenic
  • BLOSUM62 scores: D>N=1, D>H=-1, D>Y=-3, D>G=-1
Sources
vcep_m_m_c_2clinvar ↗
BA1 The variant is absent from gnomAD and does not approach the PTEN BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BA1: filtering allele frequency >0.00056.
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
Sources
BS1 The variant is absent from gnomAD and does not meet the PTEN BS1 population frequency thresholds. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS1: allele frequency within PTEN BS1 supporting or strong benign ranges.
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
Sources
BS3 Available functional evidence shows reduced PTEN function rather than no damaging effect. The phosphatase assay score is below the PS3_Moderate threshold, so BS3 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS3_Supporting requires phosphatase activity >0; BS3 requires functional studies showing no damaging effect.
Evidence considered
  • mmc2.xlsx Table S2: D24N Cum_score -1.549791026, High_conf true
Sources
vcep_m_m_c_2PMID:29706350 ↗
BP4 The REVEL score is 0.753, which is not below the PTEN BP4 missense threshold of <0.5. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP4: missense variants with REVEL < 0.5.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score 0.753
Sources
revelcase_summary.json

Not assessed · 8 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No confirmed de novo data were extracted for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS2: confirmed de novo occurrence in a patient with disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • No de novo observation extracted
Still missing
  • No maternity/paternity-confirmed de novo observation available.
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.jsonPMID:21194675 ↗
PS4 The variant is present in ClinVar and has been reported in the literature, but the extracted sources do not provide a PTEN-specific proband specificity score or a case-control enrichment analysis sufficient for PS4 strength assignment. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PS4 requires proband specificity scoring or significant prevalence increase in affected individuals versus controls.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar pathogenic submissions present
  • Multiple literature PMIDs listed without extractable PS4 scoring details
Still missing
  • No scored PTEN proband count/specifity score extracted.
  • No germline case-control comparison extracted.
Sources
PM6 No assumed de novo observations were extracted. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM6: assumed de novo occurrence in a proband with disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • No PM6-relevant case data extracted
Still missing
  • No assumed de novo case information available.
Sources
case_summary.jsonliterature_pass.jsonPMID:21194675 ↗
PP1 No segregation data were extracted for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP1: cosegregation with disease in informative meioses.
Evidence considered
  • No segregation evidence extracted
Still missing
  • No informative meioses or familial segregation data available.
Sources
literature_pass.json
BS2 No homozygous observations in healthy or PTEN-hamartoma-tumor-syndrome-unaffected individuals were extracted. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS2: homozygous observation in healthy/PHTS-unaffected individual(s).
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from gnomAD; no homozygous unaffected data extracted
Still missing
  • No homozygous unaffected observations available.
Sources
case_summary.json
BS4 No lack-of-segregation data were extracted. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BS4: lack of segregation in affected family members.
Evidence considered
  • No BS4-relevant segregation evidence extracted
Still missing
  • No family data demonstrating lack of segregation.
Sources
literature_pass.json
BP2 No phase data with another pathogenic/likely pathogenic PTEN variant were extracted. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP2: observed in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant, or at least three cis/phase-unknown observations with different pathogenic PTEN variants.
Evidence considered
  • No BP2-relevant phase data extracted
Still missing
  • No in trans, in cis, or phase-unknown observations with another pathogenic PTEN variant.
Sources
case_summary.json
BP5 No alternate highly penetrant molecular diagnosis with non-overlapping phenotype was extracted. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP5: alternate molecular basis for disease with no phenotype overlap with PTEN-related disease.
Evidence considered
  • No BP5-relevant alternate diagnosis extracted
Still missing
  • No alternate molecular explanation documented.
Sources
case_summary.json
Not applicable · 9· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/APTEN c.70G>A (p.Asp24Asn; p.D24N) is a missense variant. The PTEN-specific PVS1 decision tree applies to null, canonical splice, frameshift, nonsense, and CNV events rather than missense substitutions. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PVS1: use PTEN PVS1 decision tree for null/splice/frameshift/nonsense/CNV variants.
Evidence considered
  • Protein consequence: p.(Asp24Asn) / p.(D24N), missense
  • PTEN PVS1 decision tree limited to LoF variant classes
Sources
case_summary.jsonvcep_materials.jsonvcep_p_v_s_1___d_e_c_i_s_i_o_n_t_r_e_e___p_t_e_n
PM3 N/APM3 is designated not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC: PM3 not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC marks PM3 not applicable
Sources
case_summary.json
PM4 N/AThis is not an in-frame insertion/deletion or stop-loss variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PM4 applies to in-frame indels affecting relevant residues or stop-loss variants.
Evidence considered
  • Variant class: missense
Sources
case_summary.json
PP4 N/APP4 is designated not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC: PP4 not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC marks PP4 not applicable
Sources
case_summary.json
PP5 N/APP5 is designated not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC: PP5 not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC marks PP5 not applicable
Sources
case_summary.json
BP1 N/ABP1 is designated not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC: BP1 not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC marks BP1 not applicable
Sources
case_summary.json
BP3 N/ABP3 is designated not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC: BP3 not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC marks BP3 not applicable
Sources
case_summary.json
BP6 N/ABP6 is designated not applicable in the PTEN specification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC: BP6 not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • PTEN CSPEC marks BP6 not applicable
Sources
case_summary.json
BP7 N/AThis is not a synonymous or qualifying deep intronic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP7 applies to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants with no predicted splice impact.
Evidence considered
  • Variant class: missense
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.02
Sources
case_summary.jsonspliceai ↗

Identifiers

Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000314.8:c.70G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000305.3:p.(Asp24Asn)
GRCh38
chr10:87864539 G>A
GRCh37
chr10:89624296 G>A

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in PTEN, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000314.8. Select a row to find it on the plot.

PTENNM_000314.8
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 SupportingThe REVEL score is 0.753, exceeding the PTEN missense PP3 threshold of >0.7. SpliceAI shows no significant splice effect, but PP3 for PTEN missense variants is based on REVEL. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC PP3: missense variants with REVEL > 0.7.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score 0.753
  • PTEN CSPEC PP3 threshold for missense: REVEL > 0.7
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.02
Sources
case_summary.jsonspliceai ↗revel
BP4 The REVEL score is 0.753, which is not below the PTEN BP4 missense threshold of <0.5. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP4: missense variants with REVEL < 0.5.
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score 0.753
Sources
revelcase_summary.json
BP7 N/AThis is not a synonymous or qualifying deep intronic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PTEN CSPEC BP7 applies to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants with no predicted splice impact.
Evidence considered
  • Variant class: missense
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.02
Sources
case_summary.jsonspliceai ↗

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (3 clinical laboratories).

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

Functional

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

Somatic

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV64295411, n = 8 times).