Reasoning
No applicable STK11-specific VCEP specification was identified, so generic ACMG/AMP logic applies. BP2 would require observation of the target variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a dominant disorder, or in cis with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder. The case evidence identifies c.658C>T (p.Gln220Ter) in affected Peutz-Jeghers syndrome probands, but it contains no additional pathogenic variant, parental genotypes, genotype-level phase result, or cis/trans observation for the same proband. Because the needed allelic observation is absent, BP2 cannot be assessed; absence of documentation is not evidence that BP2 is unmet.
Rule
BP2 requires the target variant to be observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant for a recessive disorder.
Evidence considered
- PMID:17026623 identifies the target variant in an affected Peutz-Jeghers syndrome patient but reports no second pathogenic variant or phase information.
- PMID:9887330 identifies the target variant in patient P12 and states that family history was unknown; it provides no cis/trans result or second-variant observation.
- The available case materials do not document parental testing, a second pathogenic allele, or molecular phase for this proband.
Still missing
- A second pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant and its cis/trans relationship to NM_000455.4:c.658C>T are not documented.
- Parental or family genotypes sufficient to establish phase are not available.
Sources