0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

BARD1 c.1935_1954dup, p.(Glu652ValfsTer69)

NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69) Frameshift · exon 10 View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About BARD1

BARD1 encodes a protein that partners with BRCA1 to form a complex essential for repairing damaged DNA, particularly double-stranded breaks, and for maintaining genome stability through cell-cycle checkpoints and chromatin regulation. Germline mutations in BARD1 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer, among other cancers, and the gene is generally regarded as a tumor suppressor, although some evidence suggests it can also promote cancer in certain cellular contexts.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PVS1Strong
PVS1 · strong

Met (Strong): truncating frameshift p.(Glu652ValfsTer69) escapes NMD but removes the second BRCT domain, a critical functional region.

PM2Moderate
PM2 · moderate

Met (Moderate): essentially absent from population databases, with maximum subpopulation allele frequency 0.0001178 and no homozygotes.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

With no BARD1-specific gene framework available, generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules were used: one strong (PVS1) plus one moderate (PM2) pathogenic criterion yields Likely Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
146 / 1,614,002 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 146 / 1,614,002 alleles. Recorded AF 9.04584e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.012e-05; MAF= 0.00601%, 17/282768 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000116176; MAF= 0.01162%, 15/129114 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.103e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
17 reported laboratory submissions

13 Pathogenic · 4 Likely pathogenic. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 2 not met · 14 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No PP3 or BP4 code is applied. The sole computational result is a neutral SpliceAI prediction, while the variant is a coding frameshift outside the scope of missense predictors.

No BARD1-specific ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP framework is available in the case bundle; generic ACMG/AMP criteria were therefore used.

Population data support PM2 at moderate strength under the generic ACMG/AMP framework, while the observed frequency is far below BA1 or BS1 thresholds and no qualifying BS2 observation is available.

Met · 2

PVS1 StrongMet (Strong): truncating frameshift p.(Glu652ValfsTer69) escapes NMD but removes the second BRCT domain, a critical functional region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000465.4 is the MANE Select/RefSeq Select BARD1 transcript. The 20-bp duplication is a frameshift in exon 10 that produces p.(Glu652ValfsTer69); the premature stop is in exon 11, the terminal exon, so the altered transcript is predicted to escape NMD. Although the predicted protein retains residues through 651, it replaces residues 652–720 with a frameshifted sequence and removes the C-terminal 57 residues. The exact variant has been reported to cause loss of BARD1's second BRCT domain. Functional complementation data show that BARD1 lacking the BRCT repeats (residues 602–777) fails to restore chromosomal stability and has substantially reduced homology-directed repair. With BARD1 loss of function established as a germline disease mechanism and no gene-specific PVS1 specification available, the generic ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework supports PVS1_Strong for this NMD-escaping truncation that disrupts a critical functional domain.

Rule
Generic ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798): for an NMD-escaping truncating variant, use PVS1_Strong when the altered or deleted region is critical to protein function and loss of function is an established disease mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • No BARD1 CSPEC/VCEP or local explicit PVS1 framework was available; generic ACMG/AMP assessment follows the ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798).
  • VariantValidator normalization identifies NM_000465.4 as MANE Select and RefSeq Select. c.1935_1954dup lies in exon 10; the predicted p.(Glu652ValfsTer69) product ends at residue 720, whereas the reference product extends to residue 778. The terminal coding exon begins at c.2002, placing the predicted premature stop in the terminal exon and supporting NMD escape.
  • The gene-level PVS1 context identifies BARD1 loss of function as an established germline disease mechanism and marks the gene eligible for generic PVS1 assessment.
  • PMID:26738429 reports the exact frameshift and states that it causes a premature stop and loss of BARD1's second BRCT domain.
  • PMID:17848578 found that the BARD1 BRCT motifs are necessary for chromosomal stability and homology-directed repair; deletion of residues 602–777 containing both BRCT repeats did not restore these functions in Bard1-null cells.
Still missing
  • No variant-specific RNA study was provided to directly demonstrate NMD escape; terminal-exon placement supports the prediction.
  • No variant-specific functional assay was provided; the functional evidence is for a BARD1 BRCT-repeat deletion construct.
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentPMID:26738429 ↗PMID:17848578 ↗
PM2 ModerateMet (Moderate): essentially absent from population databases, with maximum subpopulation allele frequency 0.0001178 and no homozygotes. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is present only at an exceedingly low frequency in large population databases and is absent from gnomAD-Canada. gnomAD v4.1 reports AF 9.04584e-05 overall, maximum subpopulation AF 0.0001178, and zero homozygotes; gnomAD v2.1 reports AF 6.012e-05, maximum subpopulation AF 0.000116176, and zero homozygotes. This supports generic ACMG/AMP PM2 for a rare variant in a disease context where a pathogenic loss-of-function mechanism is established, without using another source's classification as evidence.

Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: 146/1,614,002 alleles, AF 9.04584e-05; highest reported subpopulation AF 139/1,179,966 (0.0001178) in European non-Finnish individuals; homozygotes = 0.
  • gnomAD v2.1: 17/282,768 alleles, AF 6.012e-05; highest reported subpopulation AF 15/129,114 (0.000116176) in European non-Finnish individuals; homozygotes = 0.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports the variant as absent.
  • No population-frequency threshold artifact, ancestry-specific excess, or homozygote observation undermines the rare-variant interpretation.
Sources

Not met · 2 · evaluated, threshold not reached

BA1 Not met: maximum allele frequency 0.0001178 versus the 5% stand-alone benign threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant does not meet the generic BA1 population-frequency threshold. Its maximum reported allele frequency is 0.0001178 in gnomAD v4.1 European (non-Finnish) individuals, with an overall frequency of 0.0000904584; these are far below a stand-alone benign threshold of 5%.

Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 146/1,614,002 alleles overall (AF 9.04584e-05), with the highest reported subpopulation AF 139/1,179,966 (0.0001178) in the European non-Finnish population and zero homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports an overall AF of 6.012e-05 and highest subpopulation AF of 0.000116176 in European non-Finnish individuals; neither dataset approaches the generic BA1 threshold of 0.05.
Sources
BS1 Not met: maximum allele frequency 0.0001178 is far below the frequency expected for a benign BARD1 variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The observed population frequency is not higher than expected for BARD1-related cancer predisposition. The maximum observed AF is 0.0001178, and the overall gnomAD v4.1 AF is 0.0000904584. These frequencies are low and do not support a benign frequency observation under the generic BS1 criterion.

Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 146/1,614,002 alleles overall and 139/1,179,966 European non-Finnish alleles, with a maximum subpopulation AF of 0.0001178 and zero homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 17/282,768 alleles overall and a maximum European non-Finnish AF of 0.000116176, with zero homozygotes.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports the variant as absent; this does not create evidence for an excessive population frequency.
Sources

Not assessed · 14 · no assessment recorded

PS2 Not assessed: no de novo observation with confirmed parentage was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband-level de novo observation is documented in the case-evidence bundle. There is no confirmed maternity/paternity, parental genotype result, or explicit statement that the BARD1 variant arose de novo.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2: confirmed de novo occurrence in a patient with the relevant phenotype and confirmed maternity and paternity; no qualifying case evidence is available.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no individual-level parental testing, trio results, or confirmed de novo observation for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup.
Still missing
  • Proband phenotype and pedigree context
  • Confirmed parental testing results for both parents
  • Explicit de novo status with maternity/paternity confirmation
PS3 Not assessed: no validated functional assay of this exact variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No validated variant-specific functional assay was identified for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup (p.(Glu652ValfsTer69)). The reviewed literature reports the variant as a truncating duplication and establishes that the BARD1 BRCT region is biologically important, but does not test this variant in a functional assay with appropriate controls. Therefore PS3 cannot be applied.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP functional-study rule: PS3 requires a well-established functional study showing a damaging effect for the variant; no qualifying variant-specific assay is available here.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:26738429 reports NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup (p.E652Vfs*69) in a screen of 196 non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families and describes a premature stop with loss of the second BARD1 BRCT domain; it provides no variant-specific functional assay result.
  • PMID:17848578 demonstrates that deleting BARD1 amino acids 602-777, which contain both BRCT repeats, impairs chromosomal-stability rescue and homology-directed repair in Bard1-null cell assays; the specified variant was not tested, so this supports biological relevance but not PS3 for this variant.
Still missing
  • A validated assay directly testing the specified variant is unavailable in the reviewed evidence.
  • Assay controls, quantitative effect size, and reproducibility for this variant are not reported.
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no case-control enrichment statistic for this exact variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-control enrichment statistic or adequately characterized case series versus controls was available for this exact variant. A reviewed source reports that the variant was identified during screening of non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families, but this observation alone does not establish statistically significant enrichment.

Evidence considered
  • PMID:26738429 reports c.1935_1954dup (p.E652Vfs*69) in a screening study of 196 non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families, but provides no control comparison or enrichment statistic for this variant.
Still missing
  • Exact-variant case and control counts, cohort ascertainment, ancestry matching, and statistical analysis are needed to assess enrichment.
Sources
PM3 Not assessed: no evidence of a second pathogenic variant in trans or a recessive inheritance pattern. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable BARD1-specific VCEP framework was retrieved, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework was used. The case bundle documents this as a BARD1 germline cancer-predisposition variant, but provides no affected proband observations in a recessive disorder, no second pathogenic variant, and no validated phase information. The available literature identifies the exact variant in a familial breast/ovarian cancer screening context but does not establish a pathogenic variant in trans or a recessive inheritance pattern. PM3 therefore cannot be applied from the available evidence.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM3: pathogenic variants in trans with a pathogenic variant for a recessive disorder can support PM3; phase and the disease inheritance model must be established. No such evidence is available here.
Evidence considered
  • The case summary reports no retrieved CSPEC/VCEP specification for BARD1 and uses the generic ACMG/AMP fallback.
  • The case bundle provides no phase, cis/trans, biallelic, compound-heterozygous, or second-variant observation for the queried variant.
  • PMID:26738429 reports c.1935_1954dup (p.E652Vfs*69) among BARD1 variants identified by screening 196 non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families, but supplies no evidence that the variant occurred with another pathogenic variant in trans.
Still missing
  • No documented affected proband with a second pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in trans.
  • No parental or segregation testing establishing phase.
  • No explicit recessive BARD1 disease context applicable to PM3.
Sources
PM6 Not assessed: no assumed de novo occurrence with parental information was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No assumed de novo occurrence is reported for this variant. The available materials do not provide a patient-level observation, parental testing, or sufficient pedigree information to apply PM6.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6: assumed de novo occurrence in a patient with the relevant phenotype when maternity and paternity are not confirmed; no qualifying case evidence is available.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no assumed-de-novo case report or pedigree-level evidence for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup.
Still missing
  • Patient-level clinical observation
  • Parental genotype information or a documented assumption of de novo status
  • Phenotype consistency and maternity/paternity information
PP1 Not assessed: no segregation data for this exact variant were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The available evidence does not document segregation of the exact variant through affected relatives across informative meioses. PMID:21344236 mentions a BARD1 protein-truncating mutation described as p.Glu652fs in a high-risk family, but explicitly does not name the queried c.1935_1954dup/p.(E652Vfs*69) variant and provides no usable individual-level segregation data for it.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1: co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene known to cause the relevant disease; strength requires assessment of informative meioses and segregation data. No qualifying exact-variant segregation evidence is available.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:21344236 states: "Only two recent studies [12, 48] reported damaging mutations in BARD1 gene: a protein truncating mutation (p.Glu652fs) which was identified in a high-risk family and a heterozygous deletion of the whole BARD1 gene that was found in a breast cancer family." This is insufficient for PP1 because the queried variant is not explicitly named and the source does not provide individual-level segregation results for it.
  • The case-evidence bundle contains no pedigree, affected-relative genotype list, unaffected-relative genotype list, or meiosis count for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup.
Still missing
  • Exact-variant family observations
  • Genotypes and phenotypes of informative affected and unaffected relatives
  • Number of informative meioses and segregation phase
  • Evidence that the reported p.Glu652fs is identical to the queried variant
Sources
PP4 Not assessed: breast/ovarian cancer phenotype is not specific enough to BARD1 to qualify as a highly specific presentation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The available evidence places the variant in breast or ovarian cancer family screening, but these cancer phenotypes are not sufficiently specific to BARD1-related predisposition to support PP4 under generic ACMG/AMP. No individual-level phenotype with a defined, highly specific BARD1 presentation was provided.

Evidence considered
  • PMID:26738429 describes screening of non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families and identifies the exact variant; it does not provide a phenotype uniquely characteristic of BARD1-related disease.
Still missing
  • A documented phenotype that is highly specific for BARD1-related disease, with relevant differential diagnoses excluded, is needed.
Sources
PP5 Not assessed: no ClinVar expert-panel submission exists for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ClinVar contains exact-variant Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic laboratory submissions, but no expert-panel submission. Therefore PP5 cannot be applied.

Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 127725 has 20 submissions and a Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic aggregate classification, but the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic ClinVar expert-panel assertion is required.
Sources
BS2 Not assessed: no observations in healthy adults or healthy homozygotes were documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No qualifying observation of the variant in healthy adults, unaffected individuals, or healthy homozygotes is documented. gnomAD contains heterozygous allele observations but does not establish individual health status for this variant, and no homozygotes are reported.

Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 146 alternate alleles and zero homozygotes; the database frequency result alone does not document that the carriers were healthy adults or unaffected for the relevant disorder.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 17 alternate alleles and zero homozygotes; no individual-level phenotype or healthy-carrier observation is provided.
Still missing
  • A disease-relevant healthy-control or unaffected-carrier observation, with phenotype ascertainment and genotype details, is not available in the case evidence bundle.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no functional assay showing preserved normal function of this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No validated variant-specific functional assay showing preserved normal function was identified. The available functional study concerns BARD1 BRCT-domain deletions rather than this variant and reports impaired activity, not a benign result for the specified allele. Therefore BS3 cannot be applied.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP functional-study rule: BS3 requires a well-established functional study showing no damaging effect for the variant; no qualifying variant-specific normal-function assay is available here.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:17848578 tested BARD1 constructs lacking the BRCT repeats in chromosomal-stability and homology-directed-repair assays; the tested constructs showed impaired function and were not the specified c.1935_1954dup allele, so the study does not support BS3.
  • PMID:26738429 identifies the specified truncating variant and its predicted loss of the second BRCT domain but reports no normal-function assay result for the variant.
Still missing
  • A validated assay directly testing the specified variant with a normal-function result is unavailable in the reviewed evidence.
  • No assay-specific benign threshold, appropriate positive and negative controls, or reproducible normal-function result is reported for this variant.
Sources
BS4 Not assessed: no non-segregation or unaffected-relatives observations were documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No unaffected relatives tested for the exact variant, non-segregation observation, or phenotype-relevant family comparison is documented. Therefore BS4 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4: lack of segregation in affected members of a family; application requires appropriate affected relatives and a phenotype with sufficiently high penetrance. No qualifying family data are available.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no exact-variant non-segregation finding in unaffected relatives and no family-level evidence suitable for BS4.
Still missing
  • Genotypes and phenotypes of unaffected relatives
  • Family structure and age-related penetrance information
  • Documented non-segregation of the exact variant in informative relatives
BP2 Not assessed: no phase or co-occurrence data for this variant were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable BARD1-specific VCEP framework was retrieved, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework was used. The available case and literature materials do not report the queried variant in cis with a pathogenic variant or in trans with a pathogenic variant in a dominant disorder, and do not provide phase or co-occurrence data with a benign/neutral allele. Absence of a reported observation is insufficient to call BP2 not_met; the criterion remains not_assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP2: observation of a variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder, or in cis with a pathogenic variant for a recessive disorder, may support benign evidence when the relevant inheritance model and phase are established. No qualifying observation is available here.
Evidence considered
  • The case bundle contains no phase, cis/trans, co-occurrence, family genotype, or second-variant data for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup.
  • PMID:26738429 confirms reporting of the exact BARD1 variant in a familial cancer screening study, but its extracted finding does not describe allelic configuration or co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant.
  • The generic ACMG/AMP fallback is required because no BARD1-specific VCEP framework was retrieved.
Still missing
  • No documented co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant.
  • No validated cis/trans phase information.
  • No family-level genotype data allowing assessment of allelic configuration.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no observation alongside an independent molecular diagnosis explaining the phenotype was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No evidence was provided that this variant was observed in an individual with an independent, established molecular diagnosis that fully explains the phenotype.

Still missing
  • Documented co-occurrence with an independently pathogenic molecular diagnosis and clinical evidence that the alternate diagnosis fully explains the phenotype are needed.
BP6 Not assessed: no ClinVar expert-panel benign assertion exists for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No exact-variant Benign or Likely benign ClinVar expert-panel assertion is present. Therefore BP6 cannot be applied.

Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 127725 has no expert-panel submissions and its reported aggregate classification is Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic rather than Benign/Likely benign.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant Benign or Likely benign ClinVar expert-panel assertion is required.
Sources
Not applicable · 10· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/ANot applicable: frameshift produces no missense residue to compare against a previously pathogenic amino acid change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, evaluated regardless of the underlying nucleotide change. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, no altered amino acid exists at this position to compare against any previously established pathogenic missense variant, so PS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM1 N/ANot applicable: frameshift produces no missense residue to evaluate for mutational hot-spot membership. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant located in a mutational hot spot and/or a critical, well-established functional domain without benign variation. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, no altered residue exists to evaluate for mutational hot-spot or critical-domain membership, so PM1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM4 N/ANot applicable: frameshift does not alter protein length, so the in-frame length-change criterion does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM5 N/ANot applicable: frameshift produces no missense change at the affected residue to compare. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change has previously been determined to be pathogenic. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, no missense change exists at this residue to compare against a different pathogenic missense change at the same position, so PM5's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP2 N/ANot applicable: missense-based criterion, and this variant is a frameshift. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation, where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, the gene's missense-constraint properties are irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so PP2's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP3 N/ANot applicable: frameshift rather than a missense SNV, and SpliceAI predicts no splice alteration (max delta 0.00). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup is a 20-bp coding frameshift, p.(Glu652ValfsTer69), not a missense SNV. SpliceAI shows no predicted splice alteration (maximum delta score 0.00), and no calibrated missense-predictor score is available or applicable. The neutral splice prediction does not constitute computational support for pathogenicity, and the frameshift consequence is assessed by loss-of-function criteria rather than PP3.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP3; not applicable to this frameshift because no calibrated computational evidence supports a deleterious splice effect and missense predictors are inapplicable.
Evidence considered
  • The governing case framework is generic ACMG/AMP because no BARD1 CSPEC, VCEP material, or gene-specific PP3/BP4 lookup was available.
  • SpliceAI Lookup reported maximum delta score 0.00 for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup, predicting no significant splice impact.
  • REVEL and BayesDel were skipped because this variant is not an SNV; BayesDel also has no verified calibrated threshold available in this pipeline.
Sources
BP1 N/ANot applicable: missense-based criterion, and this variant is a frameshift. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, the gene's truncating-variant mechanism is irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so BP1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: frameshift, not an in-frame indel in a repetitive region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP4 N/ANot applicable: SpliceAI max delta 0.00 does not negate the frameshift's impact, and no missense-predictor evidence applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Although SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (maximum delta score 0.00), this does not predict no functional impact of the 20-bp coding frameshift p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). No calibrated benign missense-predictor evidence is applicable to this non-SNV. Therefore BP4 cannot be applied.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP4; not applicable because the available splice prediction addresses only splicing and no calibrated benign computational evidence is applicable to the frameshift consequence.
Evidence considered
  • The governing case framework is generic ACMG/AMP because no BARD1 CSPEC, VCEP material, or gene-specific PP3/BP4 lookup was available.
  • SpliceAI Lookup reported maximum delta score 0.00 for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup, predicting no significant splice impact.
  • REVEL and BayesDel were skipped because this variant is not an SNV; a neutral splice prediction cannot establish a benign protein-level effect for a frameshift variant.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: frameshift alters the protein sequence, so the silent-variant criterion does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
BARD1
Transcript
NM_000465.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69)
GRCh38
chr2:214730457 T>TCATACTTTTCTTCCTGTTCA
GRCh37
chr2:215595181 T>TCATACTTTTCTTCCTGTTCA
Location and type
Exon 10 · frameshift
ClinVar
127725

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in BARD1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000465.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

BARD1NM_000465.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 146 / 1,614,002 alleles AF 9.05e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0.000102
gnomAD v2.1 17 / 282,768 alleles AF 6.01e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 8.1e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 9e-05 · 146 / 1,614,002 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 0.0001
European (non-Finnish)139 / 1,179,966 0.00012
African/African American3 / 75,038 4e-05
Remaining individuals2 / 62,500 3.2e-05
European (Finnish)2 / 64,010 3.1e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: Admixed American, Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 6e-05 · 17 / 282,768 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 8.1e-05
European (non-Finnish)15 / 129,114 0.00012
European (Finnish)2 / 25,102 8e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 9.04584e-05; MAF= 0.00905%, 146/1614002 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.0001178; MAF= 0.01178%, 139/1179966 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.0001016.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.012e-05; MAF= 0.00601%, 17/282768 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000116176; MAF= 0.01162%, 15/129114 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.103e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.043
Pangolin splice gain
0.057

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/ANot applicable: frameshift rather than a missense SNV, and SpliceAI predicts no splice alteration (max delta 0.00). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup is a 20-bp coding frameshift, p.(Glu652ValfsTer69), not a missense SNV. SpliceAI shows no predicted splice alteration (maximum delta score 0.00), and no calibrated missense-predictor score is available or applicable. The neutral splice prediction does not constitute computational support for pathogenicity, and the frameshift consequence is assessed by loss-of-function criteria rather than PP3.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP3; not applicable to this frameshift because no calibrated computational evidence supports a deleterious splice effect and missense predictors are inapplicable.
Evidence considered
  • The governing case framework is generic ACMG/AMP because no BARD1 CSPEC, VCEP material, or gene-specific PP3/BP4 lookup was available.
  • SpliceAI Lookup reported maximum delta score 0.00 for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup, predicting no significant splice impact.
  • REVEL and BayesDel were skipped because this variant is not an SNV; BayesDel also has no verified calibrated threshold available in this pipeline.
Sources
BP4 N/ANot applicable: SpliceAI max delta 0.00 does not negate the frameshift's impact, and no missense-predictor evidence applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Although SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (maximum delta score 0.00), this does not predict no functional impact of the 20-bp coding frameshift p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). No calibrated benign missense-predictor evidence is applicable to this non-SNV. Therefore BP4 cannot be applied.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP4; not applicable because the available splice prediction addresses only splicing and no calibrated benign computational evidence is applicable to the frameshift consequence.
Evidence considered
  • The governing case framework is generic ACMG/AMP because no BARD1 CSPEC, VCEP material, or gene-specific PP3/BP4 lookup was available.
  • SpliceAI Lookup reported maximum delta score 0.00 for NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup, predicting no significant splice impact.
  • REVEL and BayesDel were skipped because this variant is not an SNV; a neutral splice prediction cannot establish a benign protein-level effect for a frameshift variant.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: frameshift alters the protein sequence, so the silent-variant criterion does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_000465.4:c.1935_1954dup in BARD1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_000456.2:p.(Glu652ValfsTer69). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

8 paper records listed. 2 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Structural requirements for the BARD1 tumor suppressor in chromosomal stability and homology-directed DNA repair.
    Laufer M et al. · 2007 Nov 23
    The exact BARD1 c.1935_1954dup / NP_000456.2:p.(E652Vfs*69) variant is not mentioned. The paper reports that the BARD1 C-terminal BRCT motifs, encoded by amino acids 602–777, are required for chromosomal stability and efficient homology-directed repair of induced DNA double-strand breaks. In Bard1-null mouse mammary carcinoma cells, expression of BARD1 lacking the BRCT repeats failed to restore chromosomal stability and produced substantially less HDR than full-length BARD1.
    → PVS1 · strong Does not name this variant
    PMID 17848578 ↗
    Source detail
    These data indicate that both the ankyrin and BRCT motifs of BARD1 are necessary for suppression of both spontaneous and MMC-induced chromosomal instability.

    Location Results, 'The Ankyrin and BRCT Motifs of BARD1 Are Necessary for Maintenance of Chromosomal Stability'; Table 1; Results, 'The RING, Ankyrin, and BRCT Motifs of BARD1 Are Each Necessary for Homology-directed Repair'

    Context Functional complementation and DR-GFP/I-SceI homology-directed repair assays in Bard1-null mouse mammary carcinoma cell lines, including cells expressing full-length BARD1 or a BARD1 deletion lacking amino acids 602–777 containing the two BRCT repeats.

  • New concepts on BARD1: Regulator of BRCA pathways and beyond.
    Irminger-Finger I et al. · 2016 Mar
    In a screening study of 196 non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families, the paper reports the exact BARD1 frameshift duplication c.1935_1954dup, resulting in p.E652Vfs*69. It states that this variant causes a premature stop and loss of BARD1's second BRCT domain.
    → PVS1 · strong Names this variant
    PMID 26738429 ↗
    Source detail
    The screening of 196 non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families for BARD1 germline mutations identified eleven intron variants and fifteen exon variants, comprising nine missense mutations, four silent mutations, one in-frame deletion and one frame-shift duplication (c.1935_1954dup; p.E652Vfs*69) causing a premature stop and loss of the second BRCT domain of BARD1 (De Brakeleer et al., 2010).

    Location Section 7.1.1.1, page 16

    Context Screening of 196 non-BRCA1/2 breast or ovarian cancer families for germline BARD1 mutations; exon and intron variant identification.

Other recorded publications

  • BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20029420 ↗
  • Identification of a RING protein that can interact in vivo with the BRCA1 gene product.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 8944023 ↗
  • Crystal structure of the BARD1 BRCT domains.
    Birrane G et al. · 2007
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 17550235 ↗
  • Cancer predisposing BARD1 mutations in breast-ovarian cancer families.
    Ratajska M et al. · 2012
    The paper does not explicitly name BARD1 c.1935_1954dup or NP_000456.2:p.(E652Vfs*69). It states that a previous study reported a BARD1 protein-truncating mutation described as p.Glu652fs in a high-risk family. In the present study, the authors identified other BARD1 alterations, including a nonsense mutation that caused premature termination and a protein lacking both BRCT domains, and a splice variant that caused exon 5 skipping. The paper also describes BARD1 as a BRCA1-associated protein involved in DNA double-strand-break repair and apoptosis.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 21344236 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Only two recent studies [12, 48] reported damaging mutations in BARD1 gene: a protein truncating mutation (p.Glu652fs) which was identified in a high-risk family and a heterozygous deletion of the whole BARD1 gene that was found in a breast cancer family.

    Discussion, paragraph 2

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 26467025 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 9.04584e-05; MAF= 0.00905%, 146/1614002 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.0001178; MAF= 0.01178%, 139/1179966 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.0001016.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.012e-05; MAF= 0.00601%, 17/282768 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000116176; MAF= 0.01162%, 15/129114 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.103e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (13 clinical laboratories) and as Likely pathogenic (4 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 127725)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.