0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

PMS2 c.23+32dup, p.?

NM_000535.7:c.23+32dup NP_000526.2:p.? View identifiers
Classification
Likely benign

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely benign. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely benign.A likely benign classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About PMS2

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen PMS2 VCEP v2.0.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 2
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 2
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this intronic duplication, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the PMS2 VCEP BP4 threshold of 0.1.

BP7Supporting
BP7 · supporting

This intronic duplication is located at c.23+32, which is beyond the +7 intronic threshold specified for BP7, meeting the PMS2 VCEP location requirement for a benign supporting code.

Recorded classification: Likely benign

ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for PMS2 Version 2.0.0 v2.0.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule19 (Benign.Supporting >=2) with applied criteria: BP7 supporting, BP4 supporting; maps to Likely Benign.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
81 / 1,612,004 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 81 / 1,612,004 alleles. Recorded AF 5.0248e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.99226e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/250242 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.77292e-05; MAF= 0.00177%, 2/112808 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.94e-06.

No listed criterion applied
No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
No screenshot for this evidence
Functional evidence
Not recorded

No standalone functional evidence summary is recorded in evidence_summary.functional.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Context only COSMIC ↗
For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PMS2 VCEP v2.0.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 5 not met · 11 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The PMS2 NM_000535.7:c.23+32dup (NP_000526.2:p.?) variant has been reported in ClinVar as likely benign by one clinical laboratory.

In gnomAD, this variant has a v4.1 total allele frequency of 5.0248e-05 (81/1612004 alleles) and a grpmax filtering allele frequency of 5.301e-05, which is above the PMS2 PM2 threshold of 0.00002 but below the BS1 threshold of 0.00028.

This intronic duplication is located at c.23+32, beyond the PMS2 BP7 boundary of +7, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.02, supporting BP7 and BP4 while arguing against PP3 and PVS1.

Met · 2

BP4 SupportingSpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this intronic duplication, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the PMS2 VCEP BP4 threshold of 0.1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
For intronic and synonymous variants: SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact with delta score <= 0.1 as per Walker et al 2023.
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score = 0.02.
  • PMS2 VCEP BP4 for intronic variants requires SpliceAI delta score <= 0.1.
Sources
BP7 SupportingThis intronic duplication is located at c.23+32, which is beyond the +7 intronic threshold specified for BP7, meeting the PMS2 VCEP location requirement for a benign supporting code. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
A synonymous (silent) or intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7 (5′/3′ exonic). Variants may satisfy both BP7 and BP4.
Evidence considered
  • Variant nomenclature places the change at intronic position +32.
  • PMS2 VCEP BP7 applies to intronic variants at or beyond +7.
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PVS1 This deep intronic duplication does not fall within the PMS2 VCEP default PVS1 categories for nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, or qualifying large rearrangement variants, and no patient RNA evidence was identified to show that the variant causes a loss-of-function splicing abnormality. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
PMS2 VCEP PVS1 applies to specified null variants or to variants with qualifying constitutional RNA evidence showing a pathogenic splicing aberration.
Evidence considered
  • PVS1 gene gate is eligible for PMS2 loss of function.
  • Generic PVS1 scaffold indicates this variant is not in a default null-variant bucket.
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score = 0.02
  • without evidence of a major splice defect.
Still missing
  • No constitutional RNA study demonstrating a pathogenic splice defect was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentspliceai ↗
PM2 The gnomAD v4.1 total allele frequency is 5.0248e-05 (81/1612004 alleles; 0.00502%), which is above the PMS2 VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.00002 (1 in 50,000 alleles), so PM2 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Absent/extremely rare allele frequency <0.00002 (<1 in 50,000 alleles) in gnomAD v4 dataset.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 total AF = 5.0248e-05 (81/1612004).
  • PMS2 VCEP PM2 threshold requires AF < 0.00002.
  • gnomAD v2.1 total AF was lower at 7.99226e-06
  • but the PMS2 VCEP rule specifies the v4 dataset.
Sources
PP3 SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the PMS2 VCEP PP3 threshold of 0.2 for a predicted splice defect, so PP3 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Predicted splice defect for non-canonical splicing nucleotides using SpliceAI with delta score >= 0.2 as per Walker et al 2023.
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score = 0.02.
  • PMS2 VCEP PP3 for non-canonical splice variants requires SpliceAI delta score >= 0.2.
Sources
BA1 The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 5.301e-05 (0.005301%), which is below the PMS2 VCEP BA1 threshold of 0.0028 (0.28%), so BA1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.0028 (0.28%) and variant is excluded as founder pathogenic variant.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF = 5.301e-05.
  • PMS2 VCEP BA1 threshold = 0.0028.
Sources
BS1 The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 5.301e-05 (0.005301%), which is below the PMS2 VCEP BS1 range threshold of 0.00028 (0.028%), so BS1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.00028 and < 0.0028 (0.028-0.28%) and variant is excluded as founder pathogenic variant.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF = 5.301e-05.
  • PMS2 VCEP BS1 threshold requires grpmax FAF >= 0.00028 and < 0.0028.
Sources

Not assessed · 11 · no assessment recorded

PS1 No evidence was identified that this variant affects the same non-canonical splice nucleotide as a previously established pathogenic or likely pathogenic PMS2 splice variant with similar or worse predicted splicing impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Variants affecting the same non-canonical splice nucleotide as a confirmed Pathogenic splice variant with similar or worse splicing in silico prediction using SpliceAI, or the analogous Likely Pathogenic rule for PS1_Moderate.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP PS1 requires a previously established pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant at the same non-canonical splice nucleotide with similar or worse SpliceAI prediction.
  • No exact match for this variant was identified in the reviewed pilot variant spreadsheet.
Still missing
  • Variant-level evidence for previously established pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants at the same non-canonical splice nucleotide was not identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_vcep_pilot_variants_mmr
PS2 No de novo data with the required tumor context or parental confirmation were identified, so this criterion cannot be assessed from the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
De novo points-based PMS2 VCEP rule.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP PS2 requires de novo points supported by tumor findings and parental confirmation.
Still missing
  • No confirmed de novo observations were identified.
  • No qualifying tumor data linked to a de novo occurrence were identified.
Sources
PS3 No calibrated functional assay or constitutional RNA study demonstrating a damaging effect was identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Calibrated functional assays with pathogenic odds above threshold, MMR function defect by flowchart, or qualifying monoallelic expression loss.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP PS3 requires calibrated functional evidence or qualifying RNA evidence.
Still missing
  • No variant-specific protein functional assay data were identified.
  • No variant-specific constitutional RNA data showing loss of normal transcript were identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_functional_assay_flowchartvcep_functional_assay_svi_documentation_mmr
PM3 No observations were identified to score this variant in trans with another pathogenic PMS2 variant for the PMS2 VCEP PM3 point system. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Points-based in trans observations under the PMS2 VCEP PM3 framework.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP PM3 requires points from qualifying in trans observations.
Still missing
  • No phase-confirmed in trans observations were identified.
  • No CMMRD-related case evidence relevant to PM3 scoring was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_table_for_cmmrd_diagnosis
PM5 This is not a missense variant, and no evidence was identified to support applying a same-residue missense rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change was classified by this VCEP as pathogenic or likely pathogenic on the protein level and not due to aberrant splicing.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP PM5 is a missense same-residue rule.
Sources
PP1 No segregation data were identified, so co-segregation support cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Co-segregation with disease in pedigree(s) with a combined Bayes Likelihood Ratio exceeding the PP1 thresholds.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP PP1 requires segregation evidence quantified by Bayes likelihood ratio.
Still missing
  • No pedigree-based segregation evidence or Bayes likelihood ratios were identified.
Sources
PP4 No MSI-high tumor findings or mismatch repair protein loss data consistent with PMS2 were identified, so phenotype-based support is not established. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
CRC/endometrial MSI-H and/or loss of MMR protein expression consistent with variant location.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP PP4 requires qualifying MSI-H and/or IHC evidence.
Still missing
  • No CRC or endometrial tumor MSI data were identified.
  • No immunohistochemistry data showing protein loss consistent with PMS2 were identified.
Sources
BS2 No evidence was identified that this variant co-occurs in trans with a known pathogenic PMS2 variant in a person meeting the PMS2 VCEP conditions for BS2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Co-occurrence in trans with a known pathogenic sequence variant in the same gene in a patient meeting the PMS2 VCEP BS2 clinical conditions.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP BS2 requires in trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic PMS2 variant plus clinical context excluding CMMRD.
Still missing
  • No qualifying in trans co-occurrence data were identified.
  • No clinical information was identified to evaluate absence of CMMRD features under the VCEP rule.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_table_for_cmmrd_diagnosis
BS3 No functional or RNA evidence demonstrating no damaging effect was identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Calibrated functional assays with benign odds thresholds, no associated mRNA aberration in qualifying RNA assays, or proficient function in protein and mRNA assays.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP BS3 requires calibrated benign functional evidence or qualifying RNA evidence showing no aberration.
Still missing
  • No variant-specific constitutional RNA assay showing no aberrant transcript was identified.
  • No variant-specific functional assay showing proficient function was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_functional_assay_flowchartvcep_functional_assay_svi_documentation_mmr
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified, so BS4 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Lack of co-segregation with disease in pedigree(s) with a combined Bayes Likelihood Ratio within the BS4 thresholds.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP BS4 requires quantified lack-of-segregation evidence.
Still missing
  • No pedigree-based lack-of-segregation evidence or Bayes likelihood ratios were identified.
Sources
BP5 No tumor profile data were identified to show mismatch repair findings inconsistent with PMS2-associated disease, so BP5 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Tumor evidence inconsistent with the gene demonstrating genetic variation, or qualifying BRAF/MLH1 methylation evidence under the PMS2 VCEP rule.
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP BP5 requires specific tumor-based evidence inconsistent with PMS2-associated disease.
Still missing
  • No qualifying MSS or discordant MMR protein expression tumor data were identified.
  • No BRAF V600E or MLH1 methylation evidence relevant to this rule was identified.
Sources
Not applicable · 10· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS4 N/APS4 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks PS4 as not applicable.
Sources
PM1 N/APM1 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks PM1 as not applicable.
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks PM4 as not applicable.
Sources
PM6 N/APM6 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks PM6 as not applicable.
Sources
PP2 N/APP2 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks PP2 as not applicable.
Sources
PP5 N/APP5 is not applicable in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks PP5 as not applicable.
Sources
BP1 N/ABP1 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks BP1 as not applicable.
Sources
BP2 N/ABP2 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks BP2 as not applicable.
Sources
BP3 N/ABP3 is not used in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks BP3 as not applicable.
Sources
BP6 N/ABP6 is not applicable in this PMS2 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PMS2 VCEP marks BP6 as not applicable.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
PMS2
Transcript
NM_000535.7
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000535.7:c.23+32dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000526.2:p.?
GRCh38
chr7:6008964 A>AG
GRCh37
chr7:6048595 A>AG

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in PMS2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000535.7. Select a row to find it on the plot.

PMS2NM_000535.7
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 81 / 1,612,004 alleles AF 5.02e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 5.3e-05
gnomAD v2.1 2 / 250,242 alleles AF 7.99e-06 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 2.94e-06

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 5e-05 · 81 / 1,612,004 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 5.3e-05
European (non-Finnish)77 / 1,179,414 6.5e-05
Remaining individuals2 / 62,338 3.2e-05
African/African American2 / 74,870 2.7e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 8e-06 · 2 / 250,242 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 2.9e-06
European (non-Finnish)2 / 112,808 1.8e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 5.0248e-05; MAF= 0.00502%, 81/1612004 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 6.52867e-05; MAF= 0.00653%, 77/1179414 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 5.301e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.99226e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/250242 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.77292e-05; MAF= 0.00177%, 2/112808 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.94e-06.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingSpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this intronic duplication, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the PMS2 VCEP BP4 threshold of 0.1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
For intronic and synonymous variants: SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact with delta score <= 0.1 as per Walker et al 2023.
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score = 0.02.
  • PMS2 VCEP BP4 for intronic variants requires SpliceAI delta score <= 0.1.
Sources
BP7 SupportingThis intronic duplication is located at c.23+32, which is beyond the +7 intronic threshold specified for BP7, meeting the PMS2 VCEP location requirement for a benign supporting code. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
A synonymous (silent) or intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7 (5′/3′ exonic). Variants may satisfy both BP7 and BP4.
Evidence considered
  • Variant nomenclature places the change at intronic position +32.
  • PMS2 VCEP BP7 applies to intronic variants at or beyond +7.
Sources
PP3 SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the PMS2 VCEP PP3 threshold of 0.2 for a predicted splice defect, so PP3 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Predicted splice defect for non-canonical splicing nucleotides using SpliceAI with delta score >= 0.2 as per Walker et al 2023.
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI maximum delta score = 0.02.
  • PMS2 VCEP PP3 for non-canonical splice variants requires SpliceAI delta score >= 0.2.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 5.0248e-05; MAF= 0.00502%, 81/1612004 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 6.52867e-05; MAF= 0.00653%, 77/1179414 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 5.301e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.99226e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/250242 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.77292e-05; MAF= 0.00177%, 2/112808 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.94e-06.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (1 clinical laboratory).

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

Somatic

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV56151367, n = 1 times).