0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

TP53 c.1031T>C, p.(Leu344Pro)

NM_000546.5:c.1031T>C NP_000537.3:p.(Leu344Pro) View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About TP53

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen TP53 VCEP v2.4.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 4 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 4
PS3Strong
PS3 · strong

The TP53 VCEP functional worksheet assigns p.Leu344Pro to PS3 based on non-functional activity in the Kato framework, loss-of-function results across other eligible assays, and monomeric behavior in the oligomerization domain. Published functional studies for this variant support a damaging loss-of-function effect.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present once in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1614076 alleles; AF 6.1955e-07). The highest observed ancestry-specific frequency is 1/91074 in South Asian individuals (AF 1.0980e-05), which is below the TP53 VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.00003 overall and below the 0.00004 ancestry threshold used when multiple alleles are present; PM2_Supporting is met.

PP3Moderate
PP3 · moderate

The TP53 VCEP PP3/BP4 worksheet assigns c.1031T>C as PP3_moderate with aGVGD Class C65 and BayesDel 0.485604. Additional computational evidence is concordant, including a REVEL score of 0.862, supporting a damaging missense effect.

PP5Supporting
PP5 · supporting

Expert panel ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Likely pathogenic.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

Tavtigian et.al., 2020 - Bayesian adaptation of Richards et.al., 2015 v2.4.0 point-based framework: PS3 strong (+4) + PM2 supporting (+1) + PP3 moderate (+2) + PP5 supporting (+1) = 8 points, which maps to Likely Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
1 / 1,614,076 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 1 / 1,614,076 alleles. Recorded AF 6.1955e-07. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen TP53 VCEP v2.4.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 4 met · 4 not met · 9 not assessed · 11 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The TP53 c.1031T>C (p.Leu344Pro; p.L344P) variant has been observed in somatic cancer curation resources and has been reported in ClinVar, including a ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel likely pathogenic assertion.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present only once in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1614076 alleles; AF 6.1955e-07), with the highest observed population frequency in South Asian individuals of 1/91074 (AF 1.0980e-05), supporting rarity for TP53.

In TP53 functional studies summarized by the TP53 VCEP, p.Leu344Pro showed non-functional activity, loss-of-function behavior across eligible assays, and monomeric oligomerization-domain behavior, supporting a damaging loss-of-function effect.

Computational evidence is concordant with a damaging missense effect, with a TP53 VCEP pre-assigned PP3_moderate call, BayesDel 0.485604, and REVEL 0.862.

Met · 4

PS3 StrongThe TP53 VCEP functional worksheet assigns p.Leu344Pro to PS3 based on non-functional activity in the Kato framework, loss-of-function results across other eligible assays, and monomeric behavior in the oligomerization domain. Published functional studies for this variant support a damaging loss-of-function effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PS3
Evidence considered
  • Functional worksheet row: L344P | Non-functional | LOF | Monomer | PS3
  • TP53 VCEP functional flowchart
Sources
vcep_functional_worksheetvcep_flowchart_for_application_of_functional_rule_codesPMID:12826609 ↗PMID:9704930 ↗PMID:19106109 ↗PMID:19454241 ↗PMID:20978130 ↗
PM2 SupportingThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present once in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1614076 alleles; AF 6.1955e-07). The highest observed ancestry-specific frequency is 1/91074 in South Asian individuals (AF 1.0980e-05), which is below the TP53 VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.00003 overall and below the 0.00004 ancestry threshold used when multiple alleles are present; PM2_Supporting is met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PM2_Supporting
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 absent
  • gnomAD v4.1 total AF 6.1955e-07
  • best subpopulation AF 1.0980e-05
Sources
PP3 ModerateThe TP53 VCEP PP3/BP4 worksheet assigns c.1031T>C as PP3_moderate with aGVGD Class C65 and BayesDel 0.485604. Additional computational evidence is concordant, including a REVEL score of 0.862, supporting a damaging missense effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PP3_Moderate
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4 worksheet row: c.1031T>C | p.Leu344Pro | Class C65 | 0.485604 | PP3_moderate
  • REVEL 0.862
  • BayesDel 0.485604
Still missing
  • A directly captured SpliceAI score was not available in the retrieved text
  • although the TP53 VCEP pre-assigned code supports PP3 application.
Sources
vcep_pp3_bp4_codesbayesdelrevelcspec ↗
PP5 SupportingExpert panel ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Likely pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks PP5 not applicable
  • ClinVar expert panel classification
Sources

Not met · 4 · evaluated, threshold not reached

BA1 The observed population frequency does not reach the TP53 VCEP BA1 threshold of at least 0.001 in a qualifying ancestry group. gnomAD v4.1 shows only 1/1614076 alleles overall (AF 6.1955e-07), so BA1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BA1
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 total AF 6.1955e-07
Sources
BS1 The observed population frequency is below the TP53 VCEP BS1 threshold of at least 0.0003 in a qualifying ancestry group. gnomAD v4.1 shows only 1/1614076 alleles overall (AF 6.1955e-07), so BS1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BS1
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 total AF 6.1955e-07
Sources
BS3 Available functional evidence does not show normal or near-normal TP53 function. Instead, the TP53 VCEP functional worksheet assigns this variant to PS3 based on non-functional and loss-of-function results, so BS3 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BS3
Evidence considered
  • Functional worksheet assigns PS3
  • not BS3
Sources
vcep_functional_worksheetvcep_flowchart_for_application_of_functional_rule_codesPMID:12826609 ↗PMID:9704930 ↗PMID:19106109 ↗PMID:19454241 ↗PMID:20978130 ↗
BP4 Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. The TP53 VCEP PP3/BP4 worksheet assigns PP3_moderate rather than BP4, BayesDel is 0.485604, and REVEL is 0.862, all of which are consistent with a damaging missense effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BP4
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4 worksheet pre-assigned PP3_moderate
  • BayesDel 0.485604
  • REVEL 0.862
Sources
vcep_pp3_bp4_codesbayesdelrevelcspec ↗

Not assessed · 9 · no assessment recorded

PS1 No independently verified evidence was identified showing a different nucleotide change that produces the same p.Leu344Pro amino acid substitution and has already been classified under the TP53 VCEP framework, so PS1 was not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PS1
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PS1 rule requires an already classified same amino acid change
Still missing
  • A residue-level search for alternate nucleotide changes encoding p.Leu344Pro would be needed for definitive PS1 assessment.
Sources
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with sufficient clinical and parental testing detail was identified, so PS2 was not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PS2
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP de novo point system
Still missing
  • No documented maternity/paternity-confirmed de novo case was identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_table_of_lfs_cancers_and_points_for_ps2_and_pp1_code_application
PS4 No verified TP53 VCEP point total from affected probands was identified for this variant, so PS4 was not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PS4
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PS4 point thresholds
Still missing
  • No exact germline proband count and point-based PS4 calculation were identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_ps4_points_table
PM1 This missense change is not one of the TP53 codons automatically eligible for PM1 under the VCEP specification, and a verified Cancer Hotspots count for the exact p.Leu344Pro substitution was not established from the retrieved evidence. PM1 was therefore not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PM1
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PM1 codon list and hotspot-count rule
  • Cancer Hotspots result marked uncertain
Still missing
  • Exact somatic occurrence count for p.Leu344Pro in Cancer Hotspots remains unverified.
Sources
PM5 A different missense change at codon 344 is present in ClinVar, but the retrieved evidence does not verify a qualifying TP53 VCEP pathogenic or clinically qualifying likely pathogenic comparison needed for PM5 application. PM5 was therefore not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PM5
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PM5 requires prior TP53 VCEP pathogenic/likely pathogenic missense variants at the same residue
Still missing
  • Need direct confirmation of same-residue TP53 VCEP-classified pathogenic or qualifying likely pathogenic variants.
Sources
PP1 No segregation data were identified showing this variant co-segregates with Li-Fraumeni syndrome-associated cancers across informative meioses, so PP1 was not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PP1
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP segregation thresholds
Still missing
  • No family segregation data were identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_table_of_lfs_cancers_and_points_for_ps2_and_pp1_code_application
PP4 No case-level blood variant allele fraction or mosaicism data were identified to support TP53 VCEP PP4, so this criterion was not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PP4
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PP4 requires low-VAF observations in affected individuals
Still missing
  • No variant allele fraction data from affected individuals were identified.
Sources
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in the number of unrelated cancer-free older females required for TP53 VCEP BS2, so this criterion was not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BS2
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP BS2 thresholds
Still missing
  • No qualifying unaffected-carrier dataset was identified.
Sources
BS4 No lack-of-segregation data were identified in affected family members with Li-Fraumeni syndrome-associated cancers, so BS4 was not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BS4
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP BS4 rule
Still missing
  • No informative non-segregation family data were identified.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_table_of_lfs_cancers_and_points_for_ps2_and_pp1_code_application
Not applicable · 11· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/AThis is a missense variant in the TP53 oligomerization domain and does not fall into the TP53 null-variant or canonical splice categories used for PVS1. Available evidence does not support a predicted loss-of-function mechanism through truncation or canonical splice disruption for this change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PVS1 decision tree
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP PVS1 framework
  • generic PVS1 scaffold indicates this variant is outside default null-variant buckets
Still missing
  • No direct RNA study was identified for this exact variant.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentvcep_pvs1_flowchart
PM3 N/APM3 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks PM3 not applicable
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks PM4 not applicable
Sources
PM6 N/APM6 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks PM6 not applicable
Sources
PP2 N/APP2 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks PP2 not applicable
Sources
BP1 N/ABP1 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks BP1 not applicable
Sources
BP2 N/ABP2 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks BP2 not applicable
Sources
BP3 N/ABP3 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks BP3 not applicable
Sources
BP5 N/ABP5 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks BP5 not applicable
Sources
BP6 N/ABP6 is not applicable for the TP53 VCEP framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Not applicable in TP53 VCEP
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP marks BP6 not applicable
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants without predicted splicing impact and is not applicable to this missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BP7
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP BP7 scope excludes missense variants
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_flowchart_for_application_of_pp3_2c_bp4_2c_and_bp7

Identifiers

Gene
TP53
Transcript
NM_000546.5
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000546.5:c.1031T>C
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000537.3:p.(Leu344Pro)
GRCh38
chr17:7670678 A>G
GRCh37
chr17:7573996 A>G

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in TP53, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000546.5. Select a row to find it on the plot.

TP53NM_000546.5
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 1 / 1,614,076 alleles AF 6.2e-07 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 6.2e-07 · 1 / 1,614,076 alleles · 0 hom
South Asian1 / 91,074 1.1e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American, European (non-Finnish).

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.1955e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1614076 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 1.09801e-05; MAF= 0.00110%, 1/91074 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 ModerateThe TP53 VCEP PP3/BP4 worksheet assigns c.1031T>C as PP3_moderate with aGVGD Class C65 and BayesDel 0.485604. Additional computational evidence is concordant, including a REVEL score of 0.862, supporting a damaging missense effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP PP3_Moderate
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4 worksheet row: c.1031T>C | p.Leu344Pro | Class C65 | 0.485604 | PP3_moderate
  • REVEL 0.862
  • BayesDel 0.485604
Still missing
  • A directly captured SpliceAI score was not available in the retrieved text
  • although the TP53 VCEP pre-assigned code supports PP3 application.
Sources
vcep_pp3_bp4_codesbayesdelrevelcspec ↗
BP4 Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. The TP53 VCEP PP3/BP4 worksheet assigns PP3_moderate rather than BP4, BayesDel is 0.485604, and REVEL is 0.862, all of which are consistent with a damaging missense effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BP4
Evidence considered
  • PP3-BP4 worksheet pre-assigned PP3_moderate
  • BayesDel 0.485604
  • REVEL 0.862
Sources
vcep_pp3_bp4_codesbayesdelrevelcspec ↗
BP7 N/ABP7 applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants without predicted splicing impact and is not applicable to this missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
TP53 VCEP BP7
Evidence considered
  • TP53 VCEP BP7 scope excludes missense variants
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_flowchart_for_application_of_pp3_2c_bp4_2c_and_bp7

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.862. BayesDel score = 0.485604.

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.1955e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1614076 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 1.09801e-05; MAF= 0.00110%, 1/91074 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (3 clinical laboratories) and as Likely pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories) and as Likely Pathogenic by ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen (expert panel).

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.862. BayesDel score = 0.485604.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV52687285, n = 11 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.