About TP53
No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
No variant summary was recorded for this case.
Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.
Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
The recorded framework is ClinGen TP53 VCEP v2.4.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
This missense variant affects codon 282 (p.Arg282), which is explicitly listed in the TP53 VCEP PM1 rule as a moderate-strength hotspot codon (alongside codons 175, 245, 248, 249, 273). Additionally, the residue is a statistically significant cancer hotspot (cancerhotspots.org), and COSMIC records 10 somatic occurrences at this amino acid change, independently satisfying the PM1_Moderate threshold (≥10 somatic occurrences for the same amino acid change).
This variant is extremely rare in population databases. In gnomAD v4.1, the total allele frequency is 3.10×10⁻⁶ (5/1,613,954 alleles), with a grpmax filtering allele frequency of 7.9×10⁻⁷. The highest subpopulation frequency is in East Asian (2.23×10⁻⁵; 1/44,858 alleles). Both the total AF and subpopulation AF are well below the TP53 VCEP PM2_Supporting cutoff of <0.00003 (0.003%) total and <0.00004 (0.004%) per genetic ancestry group. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1. No founder-effect populations are implicated.
Per the TP53 VCEP PP3-BP4-codes worksheet (Supplementary Table S2), this variant is assigned aGVGD Class C65 with BayesDel score 0.360452 and the pre-computed code PP3_moderate. The VCEP PP3 rule specifies that aGVGD Class C65 with BayesDel ≥0.16 qualifies for PP3 at moderate strength. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), so the in silico assessment proceeds via the missense pathway without splicing considerations. REVEL score (0.898) independently supports a deleterious prediction.
Per the TP53 VCEP Functional-worksheet (Supplementary Table S3), the p.Arg282Leu variant is functional in the Kato et al. assay and demonstrates no loss of function in the Giacomelli, Kotler, and Kawaguchi assays (all noLOF). This satisfies the TP53 VCEP BS3_Strong rule: 'Functional on Kato et al. data AND no loss of function (LOF) by the majority of available eligible assays.' The variant retains wild-type-like protein function across multiple orthogonal functional assays, providing strong evidence for a benign functional effect.
Tavtigian et.al., 2020 - Bayesian adaptation of Richards et.al., 2015 v2.4.0 point-based framework: PM1 moderate (+2) + PM2 supporting (+1) + PP3 moderate (+2) + BS3 strong (-4) = 1 points, which maps to VUS.
Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.
gnomAD v4.1: 5 / 1,613,954 alleles. Recorded AF 3.09798e-06. Recorded homozygote count 0.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.
6 Uncertain significance.
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Neutral; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Neutral.
This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53068318, n = 10 times).
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.
ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen TP53 VCEP v2.4.0, with the data and sources behind each one.
29 criteria with recorded statuses: 4 met · 10 not met · 1 not assessed · 14 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
NM_000546.5:c.845G>T (p.Arg282Leu) is a missense variant in exon 8 of TP53, assessed under the ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel specifications version 2.4.0 (Tavtigian point-based framework).
This variant affects codon 282, a well-established mutational hotspot within the DNA-binding domain explicitly listed in the TP53 VCEP PM1 rule. The residue is a statistically significant cancer hotspot with 10 somatic occurrences in COSMIC, satisfying PM1 at moderate strength (+2 points).
The variant is extremely rare in population databases: gnomAD v4.1 reports an allele frequency of 3.10×10⁻⁶ (5/1,613,954 alleles; grpmax FAF=7.9×10⁻⁷), and it is absent from gnomAD v2.1. All subpopulation frequencies are well below the TP53 VCEP PM2_Supporting cutoff of <0.003%, satisfying PM2 at supporting level (+1 point).
In silico predictors support a deleterious effect: aGVGD Class C65 with BayesDel score 0.360452 and REVEL score 0.898. Per the TP53 VCEP PP3-BP4-codes worksheet, this variant is assigned PP3_moderate (+2 points). SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta=0.00).
Functional data from the TP53 VCEP Functional-worksheet demonstrates that p.Arg282Leu is functional in the Kato assay and shows no loss of function in Giacomelli, Kotler, and Kawaguchi assays. This satisfies BS3 at strong benign strength (−4 points): functional on Kato AND no LOF by the majority of eligible assays.
The variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain Significance by 6 clinical laboratories and as Uncertain Significance by the ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel (ClinVar ID: 182938). No proband data meeting Li-Fraumeni syndrome criteria was available for PS4 assessment.
No de novo observations, cosegregation data, VAF data, or BS2/BS4 evidence was identified for this variant. PVS1 is not applicable to this missense variant. PS1 has no alternative nucleotide change comparator. PM5 requires curator review of VCEP classifications for comparator codon 282 variants.
Final Tavtigian point total: PM1_Moderate (+2) + PM2_Supporting (+1) + PP3_Moderate (+2) + BS3_Strong (−4) = +1 point. This falls within the Uncertain Significance range (−1 to +5) per the TP53 VCEP v2.4.0 Tavtigian point-based rules. The classification is consistent with the ClinGen TP53 VCEP expert panel determination of Uncertain Significance for this variant.
No criteria match.
No further detail was recorded.
No further detail was recorded.
No further detail was recorded.
Every interpreted variant in TP53, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000546.5. Select a row to find it on the plot.
| Protein | Location | Classification | Link |
|---|
| East Asian1 / 44,858 | 2.2e-05 |
| European (non-Finnish)4 / 1,180,030 | 3.4e-06 |
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.09798e-06; MAF= 0.00031%, 5/1613954 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 2.22926e-05; MAF= 0.00223%, 1/44858 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 7.9e-07.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.898. BayesDel score = 0.360452.
7 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.
Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.09798e-06; MAF= 0.00031%, 5/1613954 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 2.22926e-05; MAF= 0.00223%, 1/44858 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 7.9e-07.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (6 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain Significance by ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 182938)
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.898. BayesDel score = 0.360452.
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Neutral; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Neutral.
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53068318, n = 10 times).
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.