Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.
This variantScenario
BenignPathogenic
Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.
In plain language
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.
About TET2
TET2 encodes an enzyme that converts 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, a key step in active DNA demethylation that helps regulate gene expression. It is important for normal blood cell formation, and defects in the gene are associated with several myeloproliferative disorders. TET2 acts as a tumor suppressor, and its mutations are most often found in blood cancers, where loss of its function can cooperate with other mutations to promote malignancy. Mutations are also found in people with clonal hematopoiesis who have no apparent blood disease but carry an increased risk of developing hematologic cancer with aging.
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes.
Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a
confident-looking classification can still be wrong.
Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence
before relying on any call.
01The reasoning
How it was classified
The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
Recorded applied criteria
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. TET2, a tumor suppressor and DNA demethylase, is frequently mutated in hematologic malignancies.
ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.
28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 6 not met · 13 not assessed · 6 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
No CSPEC/VCEP framework is available for TET2 in this case (cspec.found=false, gene_vcep_dir=null); generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria definitions were applied for all five codon/residue/domain criteria.
PS1 and PM5 require same-residue comparator variant data that was not harvested in this case (pm5_candidates.json explicitly skipped automatic collection); both are returned as not_assessed pending manual comparator search.
PM1 is not met based on explicit absence of a cancerhotspots.org statistical hotspot and no COSMIC somatic recurrence at this residue, though formal domain-boundary mapping for residue 707 was not available.
PP2 and BP1 are evaluated together using the same gene-mechanism evidence: TET2 germline disease is established in this case's literature review as loss-of-function-mediated, supporting BP1 (supporting, met) and PP2 (not_met).
No applicable TET2-specific VCEP or gene-specific framework was present; generic ACMG/AMP rules were used.
The case-evidence bundle contains no proband phenotype, parental testing, family segregation, meiosis, or non-segregation evidence, so PS2, PM6, PP1, and BS4 are all not assessed.
TET2 has no ClinGen VCEP gene-specific specification in this case (final_classification_framework: framework_mode=generic_acmg, official_clingen=false, precedence_rank=3, source=generic_acmg_fallback), so generic ACMG/AMP PS3/BS3 rules were applied.
No functional/biochemical assay evidence for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) was present in evidence.json, prefetch.json, literature_pass.json, vcep_materials.json, or fulltext_map.json; literature_pass.json explicitly notes total_pmids=0 across all evidence sources.
OncoKB was queried for this variant but returned only gene-level (not variant-specific) curated context, insufficient to support or refute PS3/BS3.
TET2 has no ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP-specific PP3/BP4 lookup table in this case (cspec.found=false, framework_mode='generic_acmg'); generic ACMG/AMP computational-evidence rules were applied.
The variant is a missense substitution (p.Ala707Thr) with REVEL = 0.095, which meets the ClinGen SVI-calibrated BP4_Moderate threshold (<=0.183) but is far below any PP3 threshold (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID 36413997).
SpliceAI predicts no splice disruption (max delta = 0.002), providing no basis for a splice-based PP3 and no independent basis to add a second BP4 code beyond the REVEL-based moderate call.
BayesDel was available but excluded from both PP3 and BP4 consideration because no verified published calibration threshold/PMID could be cited for it, per pipeline policy treating uncited BayesDel scores as not_available.
No applicable TET2 VCEP/gene-specific framework was available in the case bundle, so generic ACMG/AMP population evidence rules were used.
Population data support PM2 at supporting strength because the variant is absent from two reference resources and occurs only once at an exceptionally low frequency in gnomAD v4.1.
The population data do not support BA1, BS1, or BS2: frequency is far below benign thresholds and no healthy homozygotes were observed.
No criteria match.
Met · 3
PM2SupportingMet (supporting): absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, with only 1 alternate allele among 1,613,966 in gnomAD v4.1.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM2 is met at supporting strength. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 and is exceptionally rare in gnomAD v4.1, with only 1 alternate allele among 1,613,966 alleles, no homozygotes, and a maximum listed subpopulation AF of 8.474418273557612e-07. This is below the generic rare-variant threshold of <0.1% used when no applicable VCEP specification is available.
Rule
Generic PM2 rule: the variant is absent or extremely rare in population databases, with no homozygotes when relevant; under the generic non-VCEP operating threshold, AF <0.1% supports PM2 at supporting strength.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v2.1 reports the variant as absent.
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports the variant as absent.
gnomAD v4.1 reports one alternate allele among 1,613,966 total alleles (AF 6.195917386115941e-07), zero homozygotes, and highest listed subpopulation AF 8.474418273557612e-07 in European non-Finnish samples.
The maximum observed frequency is below the generic PM2 threshold of <0.1% for a rare variant in population databases.
No applicable TET2 VCEP or gene-specific framework was retrieved; generic ACMG/AMP fallback was therefore used.
Still missing
The case does not provide a TET2-specific disease prevalence/penetrance-based maximum credible allele frequency or a complete ancestry-matched control dataset beyond the referenced population resources.
BP1SupportingMet (supporting): TET2 germline disease is driven by loss-of-function variants, favoring benignity for this missense change.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP1 applies to a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating/loss-of-function variants are known to cause disease. The case's gene-level germline context (pvs1_gene_context.json) establishes that TET2 germline disease (ALPS-like phenotype, hematologic malignancy predisposition) is mediated through loss-of-function variants, with lof_mechanism_supported=true and no missense-mechanism disease evidence identified in this bundle. This truncating-predominant disease mechanism supports BP1 at supporting strength for this missense variant.
Rule
generic_ACMG_2015_BP1
Evidence considered
pvs1_gene_context.json germline literature review (targeted TET2 germline syndrome/loss-of-function queries) supports TET2 loss-of-function as the established germline disease mechanism (lof_mechanism_supported=true), consistent with a gene where truncating variants primarily cause disease, favoring BP1 for this missense variant.
Sources
pvs1_gene_context
BP4ModerateMet (moderate): REVEL score 0.095 vs the <=0.183 benign-predicting threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No governing VCEP/CSPEC was found for TET2 (generic_acmg framework), so generic ACMG/AMP computational-evidence rules apply. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) has a REVEL score of 0.095, which falls at or below the ClinGen SVI-calibrated REVEL BP4_Moderate threshold (<=0.183) from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID 36413997), supporting a benign missense prediction at moderate strength. This is corroborated by SpliceAI, which predicts no splice impact for this substitution (max delta score = 0.002), consistent with a purely missense mechanism with no competing splice-disruption signal; the SpliceAI result is used only as corroborating context and is not independently counted as a second BP4 code for the same criterion.
Rule
generic_acmg_2015_revel_svi_calibration
Evidence considered
REVEL score = 0.095 for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) meets the ClinGen SVI-calibrated BP4_Moderate threshold (<=0.183) per Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID 36413997), supporting a benign in-silico prediction at moderate strength.
SpliceAI shows no meaningful splice impact (max delta score = 0.002; all individual DS scores <=0.002), which is consistent with the missense-only interpretation and does not add a separate splice-based benign code alongside the REVEL-based BP4 call.
BayesDel score (-0.507189) was retrieved but not used to strengthen or independently support BP4 because no verified published threshold/PMID for BayesDel calibration is available to this pipeline.
PM1Not met: no hotspot or somatic-recurrence signal was found, and residue 707 lies outside TET2's established catalytic domains.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM1 requires the variant to fall in a well-established mutational hotspot or critical, functionally important domain without benign variation. Cancerhotspots.org query for TET2 A707 returned no result (search_status=no_result), and COSMIC returned no somatic recurrence at this position, arguing against a statistical hotspot. No UniProt/InterPro/Pfam domain-boundary annotation for TET2 was retrieved in this case bundle to confirm or exclude residue 707 from the catalytic (DSBH/Cys-rich, approx. residues 1134-1936) or CXXC domains of TET2; residue 707 lies in the large, poorly conserved central region of the 2002-aa protein outside those established catalytic elements based on general TET2 domain architecture. Given the explicit absence of hotspot/somatic recurrence signal and no domain evidence supporting residue 707 as functionally critical, PM1 is not met.
Rule
generic_ACMG_2015_PM1
Evidence considered
cancerhotspots.org query 'TET2 A707' returned search_status=no_result / found=false with evidence_sentence 'This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.'
COSMIC search for TET2 c.2119G>A returned found=false with evidence_sentence 'This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).'
OncoKB query for TET2 A707T returned classification 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence, consistent with no established hotspot/functional-domain signal at this residue.
Still missing
No UniProt/InterPro domain-boundary data for TET2 was retrieved in this case; a formal domain-mapping check for residue 707 (relative to the CXXC and DSBH/Cys-rich catalytic domains) is recommended for full confidence.
PP2Not met: TET2 germline disease is mediated by loss-of-function variants, not by recurrent missense changes.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP2 requires a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation where missense variants are a common/established mechanism of disease. The germline disease-context literature review for TET2 captured in this case (pvs1_gene_context.json) specifically supports loss-of-function (nonsense/frameshift-type) as the germline disease mechanism ('lof_mechanism_supported': true; 'mechanism_rationale': targeted literature review identified TET2 loss-of-function as the germline disease mechanism), based on reports of germline TET2 LOF variants causing an ALPS-like phenotype/hematologic malignancy predisposition. No source in this bundle establishes missense variation itself as a recurrent, common disease mechanism for TET2 (no missense-constraint metric or dominant-negative/gain-of-function missense literature was retrieved), so PP2 is not met.
Rule
generic_ACMG_2015_PP2
Evidence considered
pvs1_gene_context.json states lof_mechanism_supported=true and mechanism_rationale identifying TET2 loss-of-function (not missense) as the supported germline disease mechanism, based on targeted literature review of germline TET2 disease reports.
Still missing
No gene-level missense constraint metric (e.g., missense Z-score/observed-expected ratio) was retrieved in this case to further quantify tolerance to benign missense variation.
Sources
pvs1_gene_context
PP3Not met: REVEL score 0.095 vs the >=0.644 pathogenic supporting threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No governing VCEP/CSPEC was found for TET2 (case_summary.json framework_mode='generic_acmg', cspec.found=false), so generic ACMG/AMP computational-evidence rules apply. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) is a missense substitution. REVEL score = 0.095, well below the ClinGen SVI-calibrated REVEL supporting threshold for pathogenic evidence (>=0.644) established in the Pejaver et al. 2022 recalibration (PMID 36413997); PP3 is therefore not met on the missense computational path. SpliceAI predicts no splice impact for this substitution (max delta score = 0.002, far below any SpliceAI PP3 threshold), so the splice-impact path also does not support PP3. BayesDel is available (score -0.507189) but is not used because no verified published threshold/publication for BayesDel calibration is available to this evaluation, per pipeline policy treating uncited BayesDel cutoffs as not_available.
Rule
generic_acmg_2015
Evidence considered
REVEL score = 0.095 for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr), below the ClinGen SVI-calibrated PP3 supporting threshold of >=0.644 for REVEL (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID 36413997).
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (DS_AG=0.00, DS_AL=0.00, DS_DG=0.00, DS_DL=0.002; max delta score = 0.002), well below any threshold used to invoke PP3 on the splice-impact path.
BayesDel score (-0.507189) was retrieved but excluded from PP3 consideration because no verified published threshold/PMID for BayesDel calibration could be cited; per pipeline policy this predictor is treated as not_available for calibrated computational evidence.
BA1Not met: gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 6.2e-07 (1/1,613,966) vs the >1% stand-alone benign threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BA1 is not met. The variant is far below the generic population-frequency threshold for stand-alone benign evidence (>1%): gnomAD v4.1 reports total AF 6.195917386115941e-07 (1/1,613,966 alleles), with the highest reported population AF 8.474418273557612e-07 in European (non-Finnish) samples.
Rule
Generic population-frequency rule: BA1 requires an allele frequency greater than 1% in a relevant reference population; use the highest reliable population frequency.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v4.1 reports 1 alternate allele among 1,613,966 total alleles (AF 6.195917386115941e-07; 0.000061959%); the highest listed subpopulation frequency is European non-Finnish AF 8.474418273557612e-07 (1/1,180,022 alleles).
The observed frequency is orders of magnitude below the generic BA1 threshold of >1%.
No applicable TET2 VCEP or gene-specific framework was retrieved; generic ACMG/AMP fallback was therefore used.
BS1Not met: highest population allele frequency 8.5e-07 vs the >0.3% benign threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BS1 is not met. The variant frequency is not greater than the disease-mechanism-compatible maximum expected frequency threshold (>0.3% under the generic non-VCEP operating threshold); the highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population AF is 8.474418273557612e-07.
Rule
Generic population-frequency rule: BS1 requires a frequency higher than the maximum credible frequency for the associated disease; absent a gene-specific threshold, the generic operating threshold is >0.3% using the highest reliable population frequency.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v4.1 reports total AF 6.195917386115941e-07 from 1/1,613,966 alleles and highest listed subpopulation AF 8.474418273557612e-07 in European non-Finnish samples.
The observed frequency is far below the generic BS1 threshold of >0.3%.
Because no TET2-specific prevalence/penetrance model or VCEP rule was retrieved, a disease-specific maximum credible frequency could not be calculated; this limitation does not affect the conclusion that the observed frequency does not support BS1.
Still missing
No TET2-specific disease prevalence, penetrance, or maximum credible allele-frequency model was available to derive a gene/disease-specific BS1 threshold.
BS2Not met: zero homozygotes in gnomAD v4.1, and the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BS2 is not met. gnomAD v4.1 reports zero homozygotes for the variant overall and in the highest-frequency European non-Finnish population; gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 report the variant as absent. No unaffected adult homozygote or other healthy-control observation was identified.
Rule
Generic BS2 rule: apply only when the variant is observed in healthy adults, typically as homozygotes/hemizygotes for a recessive condition or in multiple unaffected individuals when that observation contradicts the expected disease model.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v4.1 reports total homozygotes = 0 and European non-Finnish homozygotes = 0; the variant is observed only as a single allele in the reported dataset.
The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
No source in the case bundle reports an unaffected adult homozygote, multiple unaffected heterozygotes with appropriate phenotype assessment, or an equivalent healthy-control observation.
Still missing
Population databases do not establish complete adult health status or penetrance for every carrier, so they cannot independently exclude undiagnosed heterozygous disease or age-dependent effects.
PS1Not assessed: no pathogenic alternate nucleotide change producing the same p.Ala707Thr amino acid substitution was identified.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PS1 requires that the same amino acid change (p.Ala707Thr) has already been established as pathogenic via a different nucleotide substitution. No CSPEC/VCEP exists for TET2 (cspec.found=false, gene_vcep_dir=null), so generic ACMG applies. The consolidated bundle contains no comparator-variant search results (ClinVar or literature) for alternate codon changes producing the identical p.Ala707Thr substitution; the only ClinVar record present is for this exact variant (VCV004182982, Uncertain significance, 1 submitter), which cannot be used as its own PS1 comparator.
Rule
generic_ACMG_2015_PS1
Evidence considered
ClinVar record for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (VCV004182982) itself shows Uncertain significance with 1 submitter and is not a valid same-codon comparator for PS1.
No other source in the case bundle (prefetch, evidence, literature_pass, vcep_materials) reports an independent pathogenic variant producing the same p.Ala707Thr change via a different nucleotide substitution.
Still missing
No dedicated PS1 same-amino-acid-change comparator search was performed or captured in the case bundle; a targeted ClinVar/literature search for other codon changes yielding p.Ala707Thr is needed before this criterion can be finalized.
PS2Not assessed: no de novo occurrence or confirmed parental testing was documented.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No proband-level de novo observation or confirmed maternity and paternity is documented in the case-evidence bundle. The available records contain variant normalization and population/database results but no parental testing, trio data, or de novo event.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2: de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no confirmed parental origin; strength depends on confirmation of maternity/paternity and phenotype consistency.
Evidence considered
The case-evidence bundle reports no PMIDs, no VCEP specification, and no family or parental-testing data.
ClinVar contains one single-submitter uncertain-significance record for the variant, but it does not provide usable criterion-level de novo evidence.
Still missing
Proband phenotype and case-level report
Parental genotypes with confirmed maternity and paternity
Validated de novo status and assessment of parental mosaicism
PS3Not assessed: no functional assay data addressing TET2 p.Ala707Thr were available.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No functional/biochemical assay data addressing TET2 p.(Ala707Thr) were identified in the assembled evidence. No ClinGen VCEP specification exists for TET2 (final_classification_framework indicates generic_acmg_fallback, official_clingen=false), so no gene-specific PS3 assay validation rules apply. literature_pass.json reports total_pmids=0 with no PMIDs identified across evidence sources, and no publications were retrieved into fulltext_map.json for this case. OncoKB was queried but found no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence (is_variant_specific=false, not_reviewed=true), only generic gene-level context that TET2 is a DNA demethylase/tumor suppressor. No hydroxymethylation, dioxygenase activity, or other validated functional assay results for this specific variant were located.
Still missing
No published functional/biochemical assay (e.g., 5hmC production, catalytic dioxygenase activity) for TET2 p.(Ala707Thr) was located in the assembled evidence or literature search.
No ClinGen TET2 VCEP specification available to define validated assay types or evidence strength calibration for this gene.
literature_pass.json returned zero PMIDs; a targeted literature search for TET2 functional characterization of this specific variant has not been completed within this case.
PS4Not assessed: no case-control or disease-prevalence data for this variant were available.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No case-control enrichment data, affected/unaffected cohort counts, or variant-specific disease prevalence evidence were available for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (TET2 p.Ala707Thr). PS4 therefore cannot be assessed.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS4 requires statistically significant enrichment in affected individuals compared with controls; no applicable TET2-specific framework was retrieved.
Evidence considered
The consolidated evidence bundle reports no literature PMIDs and contains no case-control or cohort prevalence analysis for the exact variant.
Still missing
Variant-specific case and control counts or a validated case-control enrichment analysis are unavailable.
No phenotype-linked cohort evidence for this exact variant was identified.
PM3Not assessed: no affected-proband observations, phase, or inheritance data were documented.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No affected-proband observations, second pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, phase information, or inheritance data are documented for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr). Therefore PM3 cannot be assessed.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM3: pathogenic variants identified in trans with the variant under assessment support a recessive disease mechanism; evaluation requires documented affected-proband observations and reliable phase/inheritance evidence.
Evidence considered
The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family, proband, genotype-phase, compound-heterozygosity, or inheritance observations for this variant.
The applicable framework is generic ACMG/AMP because no TET2-specific VCEP/CSPEC specification was retrieved.
Still missing
Affected-proband case data are absent.
No pathogenic or likely pathogenic allele in the same proband is documented.
No cis/trans phase or inheritance information is available.
PM5Not assessed: no different missense change at residue 707 established as pathogenic was identified.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM5 requires a different missense change at the same residue (position 707) previously established as pathogenic. The case's own PM5 candidate-harvesting step (pm5_candidates.json) explicitly declined to run: pm5_mode='unknown', eligible_for_classic_pm5_search=false, total_candidates_seen=0, with recommendation level 'not_applicable' pending manual review ('Unable to confirm classic same-residue PM5 semantics safely; skipping automatic candidate harvesting'). No other source in the bundle supplies same-residue comparator variant data, so PM5 cannot be adjudicated from the evidence available in this case.
Rule
generic_ACMG_2015_PM5
Evidence considered
pm5_candidates.json for this case reports pm5_mode='unknown', eligible_for_classic_pm5_search=false, and zero same-residue candidates collected, recommending manual review rather than automatic PM5 application.
Still missing
A manual ClinVar/literature search for other pathogenic/likely pathogenic missense variants at TET2 codon 707 (e.g. p.Ala707Val, p.Ala707Gly, p.Ala707Pro, p.Ala707Ser) is required; the automated pm5_candidates harvesting step was skipped for this case.
Sources
pm5_candidates
PM6Not assessed: no suspected de novo occurrence without confirmed parental relationships was reported.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No suspected de novo occurrence without confirmed parental relationships is reported for this variant. The case-evidence bundle contains no proband report, parental testing, or literature case describing the variant.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6: assumed de novo occurrence when maternity and paternity are not confirmed; apply only when a compatible affected individual and credible suspected de novo evidence are documented.
Evidence considered
The literature pass found no PMIDs and the full-text map is empty.
The case summary provides no family history, meioses, or parental-genotype observations.
Still missing
A documented patient with the exact variant and a compatible phenotype
Evidence that the variant was absent from tested parents or otherwise suspected to be de novo
Available parental relationship and mosaicism information
PP1Not assessed: no segregation or cosegregation observations were documented.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No affected relatives, unaffected relatives, informative meioses, or cosegregation observations are documented. Therefore, no segregation evidence is available to support PP1 at supporting, moderate, or strong strength.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1: cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members; strength is calibrated by the number and informativeness of meioses.
Evidence considered
The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no pedigree, family-genotype, segregation, or meiosis data.
No publication was identified that reports the exact variant in a segregating family.
Still missing
Family pedigree and phenotypic status of relatives
Genotypes of informative affected and unaffected relatives
Number of informative meioses and segregation concordance
PP4Not assessed: no patient phenotype or clinical information was provided.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No patient phenotype, clinical diagnostic information, or syndrome-specific phenotype description was provided for the case. The available TET2 and variant records do not establish a highly specific phenotype in this individual, so PP4 cannot be assessed.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP4 requires the patient's phenotype or family history to be highly specific for a disease with a single-gene etiology; phenotype specificity is not documented.
Evidence considered
The consolidated evidence bundle contains no case phenotype description and reports no literature PMIDs for the exact variant.
Still missing
Patient phenotype and diagnostic features are not available.
No exact-variant report linking a specific phenotype to this variant was identified.
BS3Not assessed: no functional assay data were available to establish normal, wild-type-like function.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No functional/biochemical assay data addressing TET2 p.(Ala707Thr) were identified in the assembled evidence, so no basis exists to conclude the variant has normal (wild-type-like) function. No ClinGen VCEP specification exists for TET2 to define validated assay types or BS3 calibration. literature_pass.json reports zero PMIDs identified, and OncoKB found no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence (is_variant_specific=false, not_reviewed=true).
Still missing
No published functional assay showing normal/wild-type activity for TET2 p.(Ala707Thr) was located in the assembled evidence or literature search.
No ClinGen TET2 VCEP specification available to define validated assay types or evidence strength calibration for this gene.
literature_pass.json returned zero PMIDs; a targeted literature search for TET2 functional characterization of this specific variant has not been completed within this case.
BS4Not assessed: no unaffected relatives were tested for the variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No unaffected relatives who were tested for the variant are documented. Absence of segregation or non-segregation evidence cannot be established from the available case data, so BS4 cannot be applied.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4: lack of segregation in an affected family, or presence of the variant in sufficiently informative unaffected relatives, when phenotype assessment and penetrance are adequate.
Evidence considered
The case-evidence bundle reports no relatives, parental testing, family pedigree, or non-segregation observations.
The available database records do not contain family-level evidence relevant to BS4.
Still missing
Phenotypically unaffected relatives with reliable clinical assessment
Genotype results for those relatives
Adequate age, penetrance, and phenotype information to interpret non-segregation
BP2Not assessed: no data show the variant in cis or trans with a pathogenic variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No case-level observation documents NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) in cis or trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, and no phase or inheritance data are available. Therefore BP2 cannot be assessed.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP2: the variant is observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant for any inheritance pattern; reliable phase and relevant clinical context are required.
Evidence considered
The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family, proband, co-occurring pathogenic-variant, genotype-phase, or inheritance observations relevant to BP2.
The applicable framework is generic ACMG/AMP because no TET2-specific VCEP/CSPEC specification was retrieved.
Still missing
No affected or unaffected proband genotype data are documented for allelic comparison.
No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant paired with the target variant is documented.
No cis/trans phase or inheritance information is available.
BP5Not assessed: no information on an alternative molecular diagnosis was available.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No information was available showing that the patient has an alternative molecular diagnosis explaining the phenotype while this variant is present. BP5 therefore cannot be assessed.
Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP5 requires an alternate molecular basis that explains the phenotype; no such case evidence is available.
Evidence considered
The consolidated evidence bundle contains no case-level alternative diagnosis or competing pathogenic variant evidence.
Still missing
No patient-level molecular findings or alternative pathogenic variant were provided.
No phenotype and segregation information is available to determine whether another diagnosis explains the case.
Not applicable · 6· recorded as not applicableShow reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴PVS1N/ANot applicable: this missense substitution does not trigger a null-variant mechanism such as nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A in TET2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001120680.1:p.(Ala707Thr). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.
PM4N/ANot applicable: this missense substitution causes no change in protein length.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A in TET2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001120680.1:p.(Ala707Thr). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.
PP5N/ANot applicable: the ClinVar record has only a single 'uncertain significance' submission, with no expert-panel pathogenic assertion.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP5 is not applicable because the exact ClinVar variant record has only one clinical-laboratory submission classified as uncertain significance with criteria provided and single-submitter review status; there is no ClinVar expert-panel assertion of Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic.
Rule
Apply PP5 only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic; ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions do not qualify.
Evidence considered
The exact ClinVar record for NM_001127208.3(TET2):c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr), ClinVar variation 4182982, is classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics in a single-submitter clinical-testing submission.
The ClinVar submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions and zero criterion-lead submissions; therefore the submission does not qualify for PP5 under the requested rule.
BP3N/ANot applicable: this missense substitution does not alter protein length within a repeat region.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A in TET2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001120680.1:p.(Ala707Thr). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.
BP6N/ANot applicable: the ClinVar record has only a single 'uncertain significance' submission, with no expert-panel benign assertion.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP6 is not applicable because the exact ClinVar variant record has only one clinical-laboratory submission classified as uncertain significance; there is no ClinVar expert-panel assertion of Benign or Likely benign.
Rule
Apply BP6 only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Benign or Likely benign; ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions do not qualify.
Evidence considered
The exact ClinVar record for NM_001127208.3(TET2):c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr), ClinVar variation 4182982, is classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics in a single-submitter clinical-testing submission.
The ClinVar submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions and zero criterion-lead submissions; therefore the submission does not qualify for BP6 under the requested rule.
BP7N/ANot applicable: defined for synonymous variants; this is a missense substitution.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A in TET2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001120680.1:p.(Ala707Thr). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
Identifiers
Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_001120680.1:p.(Ala707Thr)
GRCh38
chr4:105236061 G>A
GRCh37
chr4:106157218 G>A
Location and type
Exon 3 · missense
ClinVar
4182982
Gene diagram
Every interpreted variant in TET2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_001127208.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.
TET2NM_001127208.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Exons
—
Transcript span
—
Strand
—
Variants mapped
—
Source
UCSC ncbiRefSeqCurated
All variants in TET2—Select a row to find it on the plot; use the link to open its page.
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.
Statements
gnomAD v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19592e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613966 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.47442e-07; MAF= 0.00008%, 1/1180022 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
gnomAD v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
gnomAD-Canada
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
SpliceAI and Pangolin
SpliceAI acceptor lossat +448 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -26 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat -186 bp
0.002
SpliceAI donor gainat +240 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.009
Pangolin splice gain
0.001
Other predictors
REVEL
0.095
BayesDel
-0.507
How the predictions were used
BP4ModerateMet (moderate): REVEL score 0.095 vs the <=0.183 benign-predicting threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No governing VCEP/CSPEC was found for TET2 (generic_acmg framework), so generic ACMG/AMP computational-evidence rules apply. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) has a REVEL score of 0.095, which falls at or below the ClinGen SVI-calibrated REVEL BP4_Moderate threshold (<=0.183) from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID 36413997), supporting a benign missense prediction at moderate strength. This is corroborated by SpliceAI, which predicts no splice impact for this substitution (max delta score = 0.002), consistent with a purely missense mechanism with no competing splice-disruption signal; the SpliceAI result is used only as corroborating context and is not independently counted as a second BP4 code for the same criterion.
Rule
generic_acmg_2015_revel_svi_calibration
Evidence considered
REVEL score = 0.095 for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) meets the ClinGen SVI-calibrated BP4_Moderate threshold (<=0.183) per Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID 36413997), supporting a benign in-silico prediction at moderate strength.
SpliceAI shows no meaningful splice impact (max delta score = 0.002; all individual DS scores <=0.002), which is consistent with the missense-only interpretation and does not add a separate splice-based benign code alongside the REVEL-based BP4 call.
BayesDel score (-0.507189) was retrieved but not used to strengthen or independently support BP4 because no verified published threshold/PMID for BayesDel calibration is available to this pipeline.
PP3Not met: REVEL score 0.095 vs the >=0.644 pathogenic supporting threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No governing VCEP/CSPEC was found for TET2 (case_summary.json framework_mode='generic_acmg', cspec.found=false), so generic ACMG/AMP computational-evidence rules apply. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr) is a missense substitution. REVEL score = 0.095, well below the ClinGen SVI-calibrated REVEL supporting threshold for pathogenic evidence (>=0.644) established in the Pejaver et al. 2022 recalibration (PMID 36413997); PP3 is therefore not met on the missense computational path. SpliceAI predicts no splice impact for this substitution (max delta score = 0.002, far below any SpliceAI PP3 threshold), so the splice-impact path also does not support PP3. BayesDel is available (score -0.507189) but is not used because no verified published threshold/publication for BayesDel calibration is available to this evaluation, per pipeline policy treating uncited BayesDel cutoffs as not_available.
Rule
generic_acmg_2015
Evidence considered
REVEL score = 0.095 for NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A (p.Ala707Thr), below the ClinGen SVI-calibrated PP3 supporting threshold of >=0.644 for REVEL (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID 36413997).
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (DS_AG=0.00, DS_AL=0.00, DS_DG=0.00, DS_DL=0.002; max delta score = 0.002), well below any threshold used to invoke PP3 on the splice-impact path.
BayesDel score (-0.507189) was retrieved but excluded from PP3 consideration because no verified published threshold/PMID for BayesDel calibration could be cited; per pipeline policy this predictor is treated as not_available for calibrated computational evidence.
BP7N/ANot applicable: defined for synonymous variants; this is a missense substitution.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_001127208.2:c.2119G>A in TET2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001120680.1:p.(Ala707Thr). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
Statement
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.095. BayesDel score = -0.507189.
0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.
Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.
gnomAD v4.11 / 1,613,966 recorded allelesOpen source ↗
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
gnomAD v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19592e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613966 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.47442e-07; MAF= 0.00008%, 1/1180022 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
gnomAD v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
gnomAD-Canada
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 4182982)
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.095. BayesDel score = -0.507189.
Functional
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. TET2, a tumor suppressor and DNA demethylase, is frequently mutated in hematologic malignancies.
Somatic
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Cancer Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
This variant was interpreted by pipeline 7.1.0.
The current version is 11.0.07.
Re-running queues a fresh interpretation; the result replaces this page when complete.
Re-runs are not free. Blank draws on today's public interpretation allowance; with a code, it uses one of that code's uses.