0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

TET2 c.2926C>T, p.(Gln976Ter)

NM_001127208.2:c.2926C>T NP_001120680.1:p.(Gln976Ter) View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About TET2

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

This variant is a nonsense change, p.(Gln976Ter), in TET2. Available gene-level evidence supports loss of function as a germline disease mechanism for TET2, and the generic PVS1 framework is eligible. The premature stop occurs well upstream of the terminal exon structure for this transcript, supporting a loss-of-function effect rather than a tolerated distal truncation.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases. The gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency is 7.96388e-06 (2/251134 alleles), and the gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 2.47815e-06 (4/1614108 alleles), both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PVS1 very strong, PM2 supporting; combination = 1 very strong + 1 supporting, which maps to Likely Pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
4 / 1,614,108 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 4 / 1,614,108 alleles. Recorded AF 2.47815e-06. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96388e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251134 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 4.62022e-05; MAF= 0.00462%, 1/21644 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

SpliceAI score
0.010 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.010. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
16 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV105020525, n = 16 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 4 not met · 15 not assessed · 7 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The TET2 c.2926C>T (p.Gln976Ter; p.Q976*) variant has been reported in curated somatic cancer resources and has not been reported in ClinVar.

This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases, with allele frequency 7.96388e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.47815e-06 in gnomAD v4.1, both below the PM2 threshold.

Available gene-level studies support TET2 loss-of-function biology and structural importance of the C-terminal catalytic region, but no variant-specific functional assay for p.(Gln976Ter) was identified.

Computational review showed no significant predicted splice effect by SpliceAI, with a maximum delta score of 0.01; REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.294732 did not provide sufficient support for PP3 or BP4 for this nonsense variant.

Met · 2

PVS1 Very strongThis variant is a nonsense change, p.(Gln976Ter), in TET2. Available gene-level evidence supports loss of function as a germline disease mechanism for TET2, and the generic PVS1 framework is eligible. The premature stop occurs well upstream of the terminal exon structure for this transcript, supporting a loss-of-function effect rather than a tolerated distal truncation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Generic ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework
Evidence considered
  • Nonsense variant p.(Gln976Ter) / p.(Q976*)
  • Generic PVS1 fallback was marked applicable
  • TET2 loss of function was supported as a germline disease mechanism
Still missing
  • No official gene-specific PVS1 framework was available.
Sources
pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentpvs1_generic_framework ↗
PM2 SupportingThis variant is present at very low frequency in population databases. The gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency is 7.96388e-06 (2/251134 alleles), and the gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 2.47815e-06 (4/1614108 alleles), both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Population frequency below PM2 threshold
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 AF 7.96388e-06
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 2.47815e-06
  • No homozygotes observed
Sources

Not met · 4 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PP3 SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.01. REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.294732 does not provide a validated basis to apply PP3 for this nonsense variant. Available computational evidence therefore does not support PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
  • REVEL not available
  • BayesDel score 0.294732
Still missing
  • No validated variant-specific computational framework supporting PP3 for this nonsense change was identified.
Sources
spliceai ↗bayesdel
BA1 Population frequency does not meet BA1. The highest observed gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 2.47815e-06 overall, which is far below the 1% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BA1 threshold >1%
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 2.47815e-06
Sources
BS1 Population frequency does not meet BS1. The highest observed population frequency is 4.62022e-05 in gnomAD v2.1 Finnish samples, which is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS1 threshold >0.3%
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 Finnish AF 4.62022e-05
  • gnomAD v4.1 Finnish AF 1.56172e-05
Sources
BP4 Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation. Although SpliceAI shows no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01, this is a nonsense variant and there is no broader computational evidence sufficient to support BP4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
  • BayesDel score 0.294732
  • REVEL unavailable
Still missing
  • No validated benign computational framework for this nonsense change was identified.
Sources
spliceai ↗bayesdel

Not assessed · 15 · no assessment recorded

PS1 No evidence was identified for a different nucleotide change producing the same amino acid consequence with an established pathogenic classification, so PS1 could not be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar search found no record for this variant
Still missing
  • No same-amino-acid comparator assertion was identified.
Sources
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PS2 was not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No ClinVar record
  • No de novo evidence identified in exploratory review
Still missing
  • No maternity/paternity-confirmed de novo report was identified.
Sources
PS3 Published TET2 studies describe gene-level functional and structural effects relevant to loss of function, but no variant-specific well-established functional assay result for p.(Gln976Ter) was identified. Available evidence therefore does not support applying PS3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Gene-level functional literature was identified
  • No direct assay result for this exact variant was provided
Still missing
  • No variant-specific functional assay for p.(Gln976Ter) was identified.
Sources
PS4 This variant has not been reported in ClinVar, and no affected-case enrichment data for germline disease were identified. Somatic observations alone do not establish PS4 for germline interpretation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar absent
  • Curated somatic resource context exists but does not establish germline enrichment
Still missing
  • No germline case-control or affected-case enrichment data were identified.
Sources
PM3 No data were identified showing this variant in trans with another pathogenic variant in a recessive disease context, so PM3 could not be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No phase data or recessive case observations were identified.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence without full parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PM6 was not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No ClinVar record
  • No PM6-style family data identified
Still missing
  • No de novo report without full parental confirmation was identified.
Sources
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 could not be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No ClinVar record
  • No segregation evidence identified
Still missing
  • No family segregation report was identified.
Sources
PP4 No phenotype-specific clinical data were provided that would establish a highly specific TET2-related presentation for this individual, so PP4 could not be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No case phenotype details were available for phenotype specificity review.
PP5 This variant is absent from ClinVar, and no germline reputable-source pathogenic assertion suitable for PP5 was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
Still missing
  • No germline reputable-source pathogenic assertion was identified.
Sources
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals at a level sufficient to apply BS2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No healthy adult carrier data appropriate for BS2 were identified.
BS3 Available studies provide gene-level functional and structural context for TET2, but no well-established variant-specific assay showing normal function for p.(Gln976Ter) was identified. BS3 was therefore not applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Gene-level functional literature was identified
  • No benign functional assay result for this exact variant was provided
Still missing
  • No variant-specific normal-function assay was identified.
Sources
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 could not be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No ClinVar record
  • No family non-segregation data identified
Still missing
  • No unaffected carrier or non-segregation evidence was identified.
Sources
BP2 No phase data were identified showing this variant in cis with a pathogenic variant or in trans with a pathogenic variant in a dominant condition, so BP2 could not be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No phase information was identified.
BP5 No alternate molecular cause explaining the phenotype was identified, so BP5 could not be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No phenotype-specific alternative diagnosis data were available.
BP6 This variant is absent from ClinVar, and no germline reputable-source benign assertion suitable for BP6 was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
Still missing
  • No germline reputable-source benign assertion was identified.
Sources
Not applicable · 7· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PM1 N/APM1 is not applied here because this is a truncating variant rather than a missense change at a defined critical residue, and the residue is not shown to lie in a statistically significant hotspot. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No statistically significant hotspot at Q976
  • Available structural literature is gene-level rather than variant-specific hotspot evidence
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 is not applicable because this variant is a nonsense substitution, not a protein length change caused by an in-frame indel or stop-loss variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is nonsense
PM5 N/APM5 was not applied because classic same-residue PM5 semantics could not be confirmed for this framework, and no same-residue pathogenic comparator variants were established. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PM5 candidate review marked classic PM5 search as not eligible
Sources
pm5_candidates
PP2 N/APP2 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is nonsense
BP1 N/ABP1 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change, and available TET2 evidence supports loss of function rather than a predominantly benign truncating mechanism. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is nonsense
  • TET2 loss of function is supported
Sources
pvs1_gene_context
BP3 N/ABP3 is not applicable because this variant is not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is nonsense substitution
BP7 N/ABP7 is not applicable because this variant is a nonsense coding change, not a synonymous or deep intronic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is nonsense

Identifiers

Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_001127208.2:c.2926C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_001120680.1:p.(Gln976Ter)
GRCh38
chr4:105236868 C>T
GRCh37
chr4:106158025 C>T
COSMIC
COSV105020525

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in TET2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_001127208.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.

TET2NM_001127208.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 4 / 1,614,108 alleles AF 2.48e-06 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 6.8e-07
gnomAD v2.1 2 / 251,134 alleles AF 7.96e-06 · 0 homozygotes

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 2.5e-06 · 4 / 1,614,108 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 6.8e-07
European (Finnish)1 / 64,032 1.6e-05
European (non-Finnish)3 / 1,180,002 2.5e-06
0 alternate alleles recorded in 8 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 8e-06 · 2 / 251,134 alleles · 0 hom
European (Finnish)1 / 21,644 4.6e-05
European (non-Finnish)1 / 113,524 8.8e-06
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.47815e-06; MAF= 0.00025%, 4/1614108 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 1.56172e-05; MAF= 0.00156%, 1/64032 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 6.8e-07.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96388e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251134 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 4.62022e-05; MAF= 0.00462%, 1/21644 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -51 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -283 bp
0.010
SpliceAI donor lossat +483 bp
0.010
SpliceAI donor gainat -173 bp
0.010
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.030
Pangolin splice gain
0.060

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
0.295

How the predictions were used

PP3 SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.01. REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.294732 does not provide a validated basis to apply PP3 for this nonsense variant. Available computational evidence therefore does not support PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
  • REVEL not available
  • BayesDel score 0.294732
Still missing
  • No validated variant-specific computational framework supporting PP3 for this nonsense change was identified.
Sources
spliceai ↗bayesdel
BP4 Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation. Although SpliceAI shows no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01, this is a nonsense variant and there is no broader computational evidence sufficient to support BP4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.01
  • BayesDel score 0.294732
  • REVEL unavailable
Still missing
  • No validated benign computational framework for this nonsense change was identified.
Sources
spliceai ↗bayesdel
BP7 N/ABP7 is not applicable because this variant is a nonsense coding change, not a synonymous or deep intronic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is nonsense

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). BayesDel score = 0.294732.

2 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 21057493 ↗
  • Crystal structure of TET2-DNA complex: insight into TET-mediated 5mC oxidation.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24315485 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.47815e-06; MAF= 0.00025%, 4/1614108 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 1.56172e-05; MAF= 0.00156%, 1/64032 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 6.8e-07.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96388e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251134 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 4.62022e-05; MAF= 0.00462%, 1/21644 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). BayesDel score = 0.294732.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV105020525, n = 16 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.