0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MBD4 c.-1G>A, p.(=)

NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A NP_001263199.1:p.(=) Canonical splice · exon 1 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MBD4

MBD4 encodes a DNA glycosylase that detects and repairs deaminated methyl-cytosines in DNA, using a methyl-CpG binding domain to anchor to methylated DNA and a glycosylase domain to carry out mismatch repair in CpG-rich regions. The protein also helps repress transcription from methylated gene promoters. MBD4 acts as a tumor suppressor, and its loss has been linked to colorectal cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and uveal melanoma.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met (Supporting): gnomAD v4.1 frequency 0.02258% is below the 0.1% rare-variant threshold, though the variant is not absent.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Met (Supporting): SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00 is below the <0.10 BP4 threshold, supporting no predicted splice impact.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

Not met: one pathogenic supporting criterion (PM2) and one benign supporting criterion (BP4) fall short of any ACMG/AMP 2015 combination threshold, leaving the variant a VUS.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
363 / 1,607,956 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 363 / 1,607,956 alleles. Recorded AF 0.000225752. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.000146547; MAF= 0.01465%, 40/272950 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000290951; MAF= 0.02910%, 2/6874 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00041979.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
2 reported laboratory submissions

2 Uncertain significance.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MBD4, a DNA glycosylase, is infrequently altered in cancer.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Context only COSMIC ↗
For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 7 not met · 11 not assessed · 8 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No segregation or de novo criterion was applied because the case bundle contains no proband-parent testing, pedigree, meiosis, affected-relative, or unaffected-relative evidence.

The bundle reports no applicable MBD4-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework, so generic ACMG/AMP rules were used.

The available paper extracts concern unrelated neonatal-screening policy and general variant-interpretation guidance; neither reports this variant or relevant family evidence.

Neither PM3 nor BP2 can be assessed because the supplied evidence contains no allelic phase, affected-proband, co-occurring pathogenic-variant, or inheritance observations.

No applicable MBD4 ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP framework was identified, so generic ACMG/AMP population criteria were used.

The variant is rare but not absent in gnomAD, has no observed homozygotes, and is far below BA1 and BS1 frequency thresholds.

Population evidence supports PM2 at supporting strength only; it does not support BA1, BS1, or BS2.

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingMet (Supporting): gnomAD v4.1 frequency 0.02258% is below the 0.1% rare-variant threshold, though the variant is not absent. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is rare in broad population datasets and is below the operational generic PM2 threshold of 0.1%: gnomAD v4.1 AF 0.02258% with grpmax FAF 0.026455%, and gnomAD v2.1 AF 0.01465% with grpmax FAF 0.041979%. It is not absent, so this is rare-variant PM2-supporting evidence rather than an absence claim.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM2: absent or sufficiently rare in population databases for the disease context; with no applicable gene-specific specification, this assessment uses a <0.1% operational threshold and applies PM2 at supporting strength for a rare but non-absent allele.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports AF 0.000225752 (0.02258%; 363/1,607,956 alleles), grpmax FAF 0.00026455 (0.026455%), and 0 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports AF 0.000146547 (0.01465%; 40/272,950 alleles), grpmax FAF 0.00041979 (0.041979%), and 0 homozygotes.
  • The variant is not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0; this is an unavailable dataset result, not evidence that the variant is absent from all populations.
  • Using the generic non-VCEP operational PM2 threshold of <0.1%, the observed maximum population frequency remains sufficiently rare for PM2 at supporting strength.
Still missing
  • No gene-specific disease prevalence, penetrance, or maximum credible allele-frequency threshold was available because no applicable MBD4 CSPEC/VCEP specification was identified.
Sources
BP4 SupportingMet (Supporting): SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00 is below the <0.10 BP4 threshold, supporting no predicted splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is met at supporting strength. No MBD4 VCEP/CSPEC PP3/BP4 specification is available. This is a non-missense variant, so the generic splice-prediction path uses SpliceAI rather than REVEL. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, below the <0.10 BP4 supporting threshold.

Rule
generic_spliceai: BP4_supporting if max_delta < 0.10
Evidence considered
  • The case framework is generic ACMG/AMP: no MBD4 CSPEC/VCEP material or gene-specific PP3/BP4 rule was found.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG=0.00, DS_AL=0.00, DS_DG=0.00, DS_DL=0.00 and maximum delta=0.00 for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A.
  • For the generic non-missense splice path, BP4 supporting requires SpliceAI maximum delta <0.10; the calibrated splice thresholds are described by Walker et al. 2023 (PMID:36413997).
Sources

Not met · 7 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PVS1 Not met: c.-1G>A is a 5'-UTR change with SpliceAI delta 0.00, not a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 is not met. The MANE Select transcript NM_001276270.2 places this substitution at c.-1, one nucleotide upstream of the coding start (c.1); it is therefore a 5′-UTR/Kozak-context change, not a nonsense, frameshift, initiation-codon, or canonical intronic ±1/2 splice-site variant. The normalized consequence is p.(=), and SpliceAI reports no predicted splice effect (maximum delta 0.00). Thus no premature termination codon, exon loss, NMD prediction, or protein-length change is established. MBD4 loss of function may be a disease mechanism, but that gene-level eligibility does not convert this non-null variant consequence into PVS1 evidence.

Rule
ClinGen SVI generic PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798): apply only to a qualifying predicted null variant in a gene where loss of function is an established disease mechanism; c.-1G>A is not a canonical intronic splice-site or initiation-codon variant.
Evidence considered
  • No MBD4 CSPEC/VCEP or local gene-specific PVS1 specification was available, so the ClinGen SVI generic PVS1 framework was used.
  • The ClinGen SVI framework defines PVS1 for null variants, including nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-site, initiation-codon, and exon-deletion variants, in a gene where loss of function is an established disease mechanism. It distinguishes canonical splice positions as intronic variants within one or two nucleotides of an exon.
  • NM_001276270.2 is annotated as MANE Select in the case normalization data. The submitted c.-1G>A coordinate is upstream of the coding sequence, whose first coding nucleotide is c.1; the predicted protein consequence is NP_001263199.1:p.(=).
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG, DS_AL, DS_DG, and DS_DL of 0.00 (maximum delta 0.00), providing no computational evidence that this upstream substitution disrupts splicing.
  • The gene-level PVS1 context supports MBD4 loss of function as a germline disease mechanism, but this prerequisite does not overcome the absence of a qualifying predicted null consequence for this variant.
Still missing
  • No RNA or protein-expression/translation-initiation assay is available to determine whether the c.-1G>A 5′-UTR change alters MBD4 expression; such data could be relevant to other evidence types but would not make this variant a standard PVS1 null category without demonstrating a qualifying loss-of-function consequence.
Sources
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00 does not exceed the >0.20 PP3 supporting threshold for predicted splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not met. No MBD4 VCEP/CSPEC PP3/BP4 specification is available, so the generic splice-prediction path applies to this non-missense variant. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, which does not exceed the >0.20 PP3 supporting threshold. PP3 is also not used to duplicate the splice-prediction evidence considered for the canonical-splice PVS1 assessment.

Rule
generic_spliceai: PP3_supporting if max_delta > 0.20; not met at 0.00; do not duplicate PVS1 splice-prediction evidence
Evidence considered
  • The case framework is generic ACMG/AMP: no MBD4 CSPEC/VCEP material or gene-specific PP3/BP4 rule was found.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG=0.00, DS_AL=0.00, DS_DG=0.00, DS_DL=0.00 and maximum delta=0.00 for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A.
  • For the generic non-missense splice path, PP3 supporting requires SpliceAI maximum delta >0.20; the calibrated splice thresholds are described by Walker et al. 2023 (PMID:36413997).
  • The case PVS1 assessment identifies this as a canonical-splice variant and explicitly cautions against stacking PP3 from the same splice-effect prediction evidence.
Sources
spliceai ↗pvs1_variant_assessment
PP5 Not met: no ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification exists; both exact-variant submissions are uncertain significance. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact variant has no ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification. The two available exact-variant submissions are uncertain-significance, single-submitter clinical laboratory assertions.

Rule
PP5 is permitted only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification; ordinary laboratory submissions and aggregate labels do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 3543760 exactly matches NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A and has two uncertain-significance single-submitter clinical laboratory submissions.
  • The ClinVar submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions for the exact variant.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification would be required.
Sources
BA1 Not met: gnomAD v4.1 frequency 0.02258% is far below the 1% BA1 threshold for stand-alone benign classification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 0.000225752 (0.02258%; 363/1,607,956 alleles), with a maximum group frequency of 0.00026455, far below the generic BA1 threshold of 1%. It therefore does not meet BA1.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BA1: stand-alone benign evidence requires an allele frequency greater than 1% in a large population database, absent a gene-specific specification.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A as 363/1,607,956 alleles, AF 0.000225752 (0.02258%), with grpmax FAF 0.00026455.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 40/272,950 alleles, AF 0.000146547 (0.01465%), with grpmax FAF 0.00041979.
  • The generic BA1 population-frequency threshold used here is 1%; the observed frequencies are well below it.
Sources
BS1 Not met: the highest population frequency, 0.02899%, is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold for elevated frequency. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The highest reported population frequency is 0.000289924 (0.02899%) in the gnomAD v4.1 European non-Finnish population, and the maximum group frequency is 0.00026455. These values are below the operational generic BS1 threshold of 0.3%, so BS1 is not met.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS1: allele frequency greater than the disease-appropriate maximum credible frequency can support benign evidence; in this generic operational framework, BS1 is triggered at >0.3% when no gene-specific threshold exists.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the highest broad population AF as 341/1,176,170 = 0.000289924 (0.02899%) in European non-Finnish individuals; grpmax FAF is 0.00026455.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports a maximum group frequency of 0.00041979 (0.04198%) and a highest listed subpopulation AF of 0.000290951 (0.02910%).
  • The generic BS1 threshold used here is 0.3%; the observed frequencies do not exceed it.
Sources
BS2 Not met: 363 gnomAD v4.1 alternate alleles include zero homozygotes, so no healthy-homozygote evidence supports BS2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No homozygotes were observed in gnomAD v2.1 (40 alternate alleles; 0 homozygotes) or gnomAD v4.1 (363 alternate alleles; 0 homozygotes). The available population data therefore do not provide BS2 evidence for occurrence of the variant in healthy adults as homozygotes.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS2: observation of the variant in healthy adults as homozygotes, or as hemizygotes for an X-linked condition, can support benign evidence; no such observation is present here.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 1,607,956 alleles, including 0 homozygotes in the highest-frequency European non-Finnish population.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 272,950 alleles, including 0 homozygotes in the highest-frequency listed subpopulation.
  • Because BS2 requires observed occurrence in healthy adults, absence of homozygotes is not positive BS2 evidence.
Sources
BP6 Not met: no ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification exists; both exact-variant submissions are uncertain significance. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact variant has no ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification. The two available exact-variant submissions are uncertain-significance, single-submitter clinical laboratory assertions.

Rule
BP6 is permitted only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification; ordinary laboratory submissions and aggregate labels do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 3543760 exactly matches NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A and has two uncertain-significance single-submitter clinical laboratory submissions.
  • The ClinVar submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions for the exact variant.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification would be required.
Sources

Not assessed · 11 · no assessment recorded

PS2 Not assessed: no parental genotypes or de novo testing results were available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband-level de novo evidence is provided. The case bundle contains no parental genotypes, parental testing results, maternity/paternity confirmation, or statement that the variant is absent in both unaffected parents; therefore PS2 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2: de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history, with confirmed maternity and paternity; strength depends on confirmation and phenotype evidence.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no family, parental-testing, trio, de novo, or meiosis information for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4.
  • No MBD4-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework was available, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework was used; its de novo criterion cannot be applied without documented parental testing and confirmed parentage.
Still missing
  • Documented variant-positive proband
  • Variant-negative testing in both biological parents
  • Confirmation of maternity and paternity
  • Assessment of phenotype consistency and possible parental mosaicism
PS3 Not assessed: no variant-specific functional assay results were available, and computational splice prediction cannot substitute. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No validated variant-specific functional assay evidence was identified for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A. The available case bundle contains no RNA, splicing, protein, enzymatic, cellular, or other experimental result for this variant, and computational splice prediction is not sufficient to establish PS3. Therefore PS3 cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies the variant as NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 and reports no variant-specific experimental functional evidence.
  • The case bundle reports SpliceAI max delta score 0.00; this is an in silico prediction and cannot substitute for PS3 functional evidence.
  • Generic ACMG/AMP guidance requires functional evidence to be based on a well-established assay relevant to the gene and variant effect; PMID:25741868 was reviewed for this criterion framework.
Still missing
  • A validated variant-specific functional study with appropriate controls and a biologically relevant assay is needed, such as RNA analysis demonstrating an abnormal transcript or a validated MBD4 functional assay showing loss of function.
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no affected-case series or case-control enrichment data were provided for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No variant-specific affected-case series, case-control comparison, or statistically interpretable enrichment data were provided for NM_001276270.2(MBD4):c.-1G>A.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: PS4 requires increased prevalence of the variant in affected individuals compared with controls; no MBD4-specific specification was retrieved.
Evidence considered
  • No case-control or cohort-enrichment evidence for the exact variant is present in the consolidated case-evidence bundle; the literature criteria index is empty.
  • The two exact-variant ClinVar submissions are uncertain-significance laboratory submissions and provide no usable criterion leads or validated literature trail.
Still missing
  • Variant-specific affected and control allele counts, phenotype definitions, ancestry matching, and statistical enrichment analysis are required.
PM3 Not assessed: no pathogenic allele in trans and no phase or inheritance data were available for this recessive-disease criterion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable MBD4-specific VCEP or gene framework was available, so the generic ACMG/AMP PM3 concept was considered. The bundle contains no affected-proband observations, no confirmed pathogenic or likely pathogenic allele in trans, and no phase or inheritance information establishing recessive disease for this case. PM3 therefore cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies the variant as NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 and reports no MBD4-specific CSPEC/VCEP framework.
  • The case bundle provides no family segregation, affected-proband, compound-heterozygous, phase, or pathogenic-in-trans observation for this variant.
Still missing
  • Affected-proband case data are absent.
  • A pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in trans is not documented.
  • Parental or other phasing and inheritance information are absent.
PM6 Not assessed: no parental or clinical information establishing a likely de novo occurrence was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No unconfirmed de novo occurrence is reported for this variant. The bundle contains no parental history, parental genotypes, or clinical case description establishing a likely de novo event; PM6 therefore cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6: assumed de novo, without confirmation of paternity and maternity, in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • The exact variant NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A is not described in the available paper extracts, and no case-level de novo or parental information appears in the bundle.
  • No MBD4-specific VCEP/CSPEC rule was available; generic ACMG/AMP PM6 requires a likely de novo occurrence without adequate confirmation for PS2.
Still missing
  • A clinical case or proband report involving the exact variant
  • Evidence that the variant is absent from reportedly unaffected parents or that parentage is otherwise informative
  • Phenotype and family-history details sufficient to support a likely de novo interpretation
PP1 Not assessed: no informative relatives or segregation observations were available to evaluate co-segregation with disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No informative affected or unaffected relatives, segregation observations, or meioses are reported. There is consequently no evidence to evaluate co-segregation of the variant with disease or to assign PP1 at any strength.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1: cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease; strength may increase with the number and informativeness of meioses.
Evidence considered
  • The case bundle contains no pedigree, familial variant testing, segregation table, affected-relative data, unaffected-relative data, or meiosis count for this MBD4 variant.
  • The available literature extracts do not mention the variant or any MBD4 family with segregation data relevant to PP1.
Still missing
  • Pedigree and phenotype status of relatives
  • Variant testing results for informative relatives
  • Number of informative meioses
  • Phenotype specificity and assessment of phenocopies or reduced penetrance
PP4 Not assessed: no proband phenotype or phenotype-specificity evidence was available for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband phenotype or phenotype-specificity evidence was provided for the exact variant, and no applicable MBD4 VCEP/gene-specific specification was retrieved.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: PP4 requires a patient's phenotype or family history to be highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated bundle contains no clinical phenotype, diagnostic workup, or phenotype-specific case observation for the carrier of c.-1G>A.
  • No MBD4 ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP material or local gene-specific framework was available; generic ACMG/AMP fallback applies.
Still missing
  • A documented proband phenotype and evidence that the phenotype is highly specific for an MBD4-associated disorder are required.
BS3 Not assessed: no controlled functional experiment demonstrating preserved normal protein function was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No validated variant-specific functional assay demonstrating preserved normal function was identified for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A. The case bundle contains no appropriately controlled RNA, splicing, protein, enzymatic, cellular, or other functional experiment establishing a benign effect. Therefore BS3 cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies the variant as NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 and reports no variant-specific experimental functional evidence.
  • The case bundle reports SpliceAI max delta score 0.00; this computational result does not demonstrate preserved normal function and cannot establish BS3.
  • Generic ACMG/AMP guidance on functional evidence and benign functional results was reviewed for this criterion framework; PMID:25741868 was consulted.
Still missing
  • A validated variant-specific functional study with appropriate positive, negative, and assay-performance controls is needed to demonstrate preserved normal MBD4 function before BS3 can be applied.
Sources
BS4 Not assessed: no tested unaffected relatives or phenotype-defined non-segregation observations were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No unaffected relatives who were tested for the variant are identified, and no phenotype-defined non-segregation observations are available. BS4 cannot be assessed from the supplied evidence.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4: lack of segregation in affected members of a family; application requires informative family data and consideration of penetrance, phenocopies, and phenotype definition.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated bundle contains no non-segregation data, unaffected-relative testing, pedigree, or family-level phenotype information for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A.
  • Population frequency and the absence of variant-specific literature findings do not constitute BS4 evidence.
Still missing
  • Phenotype-defined unaffected relatives
  • Reliable variant testing results in those relatives
  • Informative family structure and number of non-segregating meioses
  • Evaluation of age-dependent penetrance, variable expressivity, and phenocopies
BP2 Not assessed: no documented in-trans or in-cis pathogenic allele and no phase information were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable MBD4-specific VCEP or gene framework was available, so the generic ACMG/AMP BP2 concept was considered. The bundle contains no documented occurrence of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant condition or in cis with a pathogenic variant, and no phase or inheritance information to evaluate BP2. BP2 therefore cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies the variant as NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 and reports no MBD4-specific CSPEC/VCEP framework.
  • The case bundle provides no cis/trans, co-occurring pathogenic-variant, segregation, or inheritance observation relevant to BP2.
Still missing
  • No cis/trans relationship to another pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant is documented.
  • No inheritance mode or family-based phase data are available.
  • No affected or unaffected individual observations relevant to BP2 are reported.
BP5 Not assessed: no case was reported in which an alternative molecular diagnosis fully explained the phenotype. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-level evidence shows that this variant was identified in an individual whose phenotype is fully explained by an alternative molecular diagnosis.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: BP5 requires observation in a case with an alternative molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated bundle contains no individual-level phenotype, diagnostic genotype, or alternative molecular diagnosis associated with c.-1G>A.
  • The available exact-variant ClinVar submissions have no usable criterion leads.
Still missing
  • A case report documenting the exact variant, the phenotype, and an alternative molecular diagnosis that fully explains that phenotype is required.
Not applicable · 8· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/ANot applicable: the variant produces no amino acid change (p.(=)), so no same-residue pathogenic missense comparison exists. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, evaluated regardless of the underlying nucleotide change. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, no altered amino acid exists at this position to compare against any previously established pathogenic missense variant, so PS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM1 N/ANot applicable: p.(=) alters no residue, so hot-spot or critical-domain membership cannot be evaluated. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant located in a mutational hot spot and/or a critical, well-established functional domain without benign variation. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, no altered residue exists to evaluate for mutational hot-spot or critical-domain membership, so PM1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM4 N/ANot applicable: the variant causes no protein length change, so the in-frame indel and stop-loss premises do not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM5 N/ANot applicable: no missense change occurs at this residue, so no different pathogenic missense comparison exists. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change has previously been determined to be pathogenic. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, no missense change exists at this residue to compare against a different pathogenic missense change at the same position, so PM5's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP2 N/ANot applicable: no missense change is present, so the gene's missense-constraint profile cannot be evaluated. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation, where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, the gene's missense-constraint properties are irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so PP2's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP1 N/ANot applicable: no missense change is present, so the gene's truncating-variant disease mechanism is irrelevant here. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, the gene's truncating-variant mechanism is irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so BP1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so BP3 has nothing to evaluate. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this is not a synonymous variant, so the silent-variant premise for BP7 does not hold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
MBD4
Transcript
NM_001276270.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_001263199.1:p.(=)
GRCh38
chr3:129439834 C>T
GRCh37
chr3:129158677 C>T
Location and type
Exon 1 · canonical splice
ClinVar
3543760

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MBD4, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_001276270.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MBD4NM_001276270.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 363 / 1,607,956 alleles AF 0.000226 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0.000265
gnomAD v2.1 40 / 272,950 alleles AF 0.000147 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0.00042
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 0.00023 · 363 / 1,607,956 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 0.00026
European (non-Finnish)341 / 1,176,170 0.00029
Remaining individuals13 / 62,166 0.00021
Middle Eastern1 / 6,072 0.00016
Admixed American7 / 59,678 0.00012
Ashkenazi Jewish1 / 29,404 3.4e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 5 other groups: European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, South Asian, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 0.00015 · 40 / 272,950 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 0.00042
Remaining individuals2 / 6,874 0.00029
European (non-Finnish)35 / 124,346 0.00028
Admixed American3 / 34,694 8.6e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 5 other groups: African/African American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.000225752; MAF= 0.02258%, 363/1607956 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000289924; MAF= 0.02899%, 341/1176170 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00026455.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.000146547; MAF= 0.01465%, 40/272950 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000290951; MAF= 0.02910%, 2/6874 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00041979.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -483 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -134 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat -67 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +87 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.004
Pangolin splice gain
0.002

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingMet (Supporting): SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00 is below the <0.10 BP4 threshold, supporting no predicted splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is met at supporting strength. No MBD4 VCEP/CSPEC PP3/BP4 specification is available. This is a non-missense variant, so the generic splice-prediction path uses SpliceAI rather than REVEL. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, below the <0.10 BP4 supporting threshold.

Rule
generic_spliceai: BP4_supporting if max_delta < 0.10
Evidence considered
  • The case framework is generic ACMG/AMP: no MBD4 CSPEC/VCEP material or gene-specific PP3/BP4 rule was found.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG=0.00, DS_AL=0.00, DS_DG=0.00, DS_DL=0.00 and maximum delta=0.00 for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A.
  • For the generic non-missense splice path, BP4 supporting requires SpliceAI maximum delta <0.10; the calibrated splice thresholds are described by Walker et al. 2023 (PMID:36413997).
Sources
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00 does not exceed the >0.20 PP3 supporting threshold for predicted splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not met. No MBD4 VCEP/CSPEC PP3/BP4 specification is available, so the generic splice-prediction path applies to this non-missense variant. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, which does not exceed the >0.20 PP3 supporting threshold. PP3 is also not used to duplicate the splice-prediction evidence considered for the canonical-splice PVS1 assessment.

Rule
generic_spliceai: PP3_supporting if max_delta > 0.20; not met at 0.00; do not duplicate PVS1 splice-prediction evidence
Evidence considered
  • The case framework is generic ACMG/AMP: no MBD4 CSPEC/VCEP material or gene-specific PP3/BP4 rule was found.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG=0.00, DS_AL=0.00, DS_DG=0.00, DS_DL=0.00 and maximum delta=0.00 for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A.
  • For the generic non-missense splice path, PP3 supporting requires SpliceAI maximum delta >0.20; the calibrated splice thresholds are described by Walker et al. 2023 (PMID:36413997).
  • The case PVS1 assessment identifies this as a canonical-splice variant and explicitly cautions against stacking PP3 from the same splice-effect prediction evidence.
Sources
spliceai ↗pvs1_variant_assessment
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this is not a synonymous variant, so the silent-variant premise for BP7 does not hold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A in MBD4 is a variant at a canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus position predicted to produce NP_001263199.1:p.(=). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: canonical_splice (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

6 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Cited in the classification

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    This paper provides the general ACMG/AMP framework for interpreting sequence variants and does not report MBD4-specific findings or any functional assay result for NM_001276270.2:c.-1G>A. It was consulted only for the general functional-evidence framework underlying PS3 and BS3.
    → PM2 · supporting Does not name this variant
    PMID 25741868 ↗
    Source detail
    The variant classification approach described in this paper is meant to be applicable to variants in all Mendelian genes whether identified by single gene tests, multi-gene panels, exome sequencing or genome sequencing.

    Location Proposed Criteria for Interpretation of Sequence Variants, introductory paragraphs

    Context General ACMG/AMP expert-consensus guideline development; no MBD4-specific experiment, cohort, or variant-level functional result is described.

Other recorded publications

  • A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document.
    Cornel MC et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23652378 ↗
  • Including the initial newborn screening bloodspot collection device serial number on birth certificates: basis and recommendations from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.
    Therrell BL et al. · 2013
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23037933 ↗
  • Newborn screening: education, consent, and the residual blood spot. The position of the national society of genetic counselors.
    Blout C et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23881473 ↗
  • Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].
    Skirton H et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24022298 ↗
  • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 778 Summary: Newborn Screening and the Role of the Obstetrician-Gynecologist.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 31022120 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.000225752; MAF= 0.02258%, 363/1607956 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000289924; MAF= 0.02899%, 341/1176170 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00026455.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.000146547; MAF= 0.01465%, 40/272950 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000290951; MAF= 0.02910%, 2/6874 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00041979.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (2 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 3543760)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MBD4, a DNA glycosylase, is infrequently altered in cancer.

Somatic

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).