0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MEN1 c.300C>G, p.(Ala100=)

NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=) Synonymous · exon 2 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MEN1

MEN1 encodes menin, a tumor suppressor protein that helps control gene activity by modifying chromatin structure and histones. Loss of menin function causes multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1 syndrome), an inherited disorder marked by tumors of the pituitary, parathyroid, and pancreas. Menin interacts with several proteins that regulate cell growth and division, and its loss contributes to both inherited and sporadic endocrine tumors.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met (supporting): extremely rare in gnomAD v4.1, 23 of 1,613,754 alleles (0.0014%), below the 0.1% threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Met (supporting): SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00, below the <0.10 BP4 threshold.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: the only met criteria conflict, PM2 (supporting, toward pathogenic) and BP4 (supporting, toward benign), so no ACMG/AMP classification threshold is reached. No MEN1-specific interpretation framework exists, so generic ACMG/AMP thresholds were applied.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
23 / 1,613,754 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 23 / 1,613,754 alleles. Recorded AF 1.42525e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.59543e-05; MAF= 0.00160%, 4/250716 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 3.53519e-05; MAF= 0.00354%, 4/113148 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.126e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
7 reported laboratory submissions

6 Likely benign · 1 Benign. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 6 not met · 11 not assessed · 9 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No MEN1-specific CSPEC/VCEP framework was available; generic ACMG/AMP population rules were therefore used.

Population data show an extremely rare synonymous variant with 0 homozygotes, but the observed allele count is incompatible with BA1 or BS1 and does not establish BS2.

PM2 is retained at supporting strength because the frequency is below the generic rare-variant threshold, with an explicit caveat that the variant is observed rather than strictly absent in gnomAD.

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingMet (supporting): extremely rare in gnomAD v4.1, 23 of 1,613,754 alleles (0.0014%), below the 0.1% threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is met at supporting strength. The variant is extremely rare in population databases: gnomAD v4.1 shows 23/1,613,754 alleles (AF 1.42525e-05; maximum subpopulation AF 1.94928e-05), gnomAD v2.1 shows 4/250,716 alleles (AF 1.59543e-05; maximum subpopulation AF 3.53519e-05), and gnomAD-Canada reports absence. There are 0 homozygotes in both gnomAD datasets. The variant is not completely absent from gnomAD, so full absent-variant PM2 is not warranted; under the generic operating threshold used here, AF <0.1% supports PM2. No MEN1-specific VCEP rule or penetrance/prevalence-adjusted threshold was available.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM2 rule with the available operating calibration: an absent or extremely rare variant in population databases may support PM2; use AF <0.1% for supporting strength, while documenting that a nonzero allele count is not strict absence.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 23/1,613,754 alleles, AF 1.42525e-05, maximum subpopulation AF 1.94928e-05, and 0 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 4/250,716 alleles, AF 1.59543e-05, maximum subpopulation AF 3.53519e-05, and 0 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports the variant as absent.
  • The generic operating threshold for PM2 is AF <0.1%; both observed gnomAD frequencies are well below this threshold.
Still missing
  • No disease-specific MEN1 maximum credible allele-frequency calculation or VCEP population rule was available.
  • The variant is observed in gnomAD, so the evidence supports rare rather than strictly absent-from-controls PM2 usage.
Sources
BP4 SupportingMet (supporting): SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00, below the <0.10 BP4 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

MEN1 NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G is synonymous (p.Ala100=). SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, which is below the generic non-missense BP4 threshold of <0.10. BP4 is met at supporting strength; this uses the same splice-prediction evidence as PP3 and is not double-counted.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: for a synonymous/non-missense variant, use SpliceAI only; BP4_supporting requires maximum delta <0.10.
Evidence considered
  • No MEN1 VCEP/CSPEC or local gene-specific computational-evidence rule was retrieved; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback is governing.
  • The case SpliceAI result for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G has maximum delta score 0.00. The supplied generic non-missense rule assigns BP4_supporting when SpliceAI maximum delta is <0.10.
  • This is a synonymous, not missense, variant; the generic rule directs use of SpliceAI only for this path. No independent missense-predictor evidence is added.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00, below the >0.20 PP3 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

MEN1 NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G is synonymous (p.Ala100=), so the generic non-missense splice-prediction path applies. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, below the generic PP3 threshold of >0.20; PP3 is therefore not met.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: for a synonymous/non-missense variant, use SpliceAI only; PP3_supporting requires maximum delta >0.20.
Evidence considered
  • No MEN1 VCEP/CSPEC or local gene-specific computational-evidence rule was retrieved; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback is governing.
  • The case SpliceAI result for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G has maximum delta score 0.00. The supplied generic non-missense rule assigns PP3 only when SpliceAI maximum delta is >0.20.
  • The variant is synonymous, p.(Ala100=), rather than missense; REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable to this variant-type path. BayesDel is additionally not usable under the supplied generic fallback because no verified published calibration is available.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗
PP5 Not met: ClinVar holds no pathogenic or likely pathogenic expert-panel assertion for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 is not applicable because ClinVar has no exact-variant pathogenic or likely pathogenic expert-panel assertion.

Rule
This assessment applies PP5 only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic assertion.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 457319 is an exact transcript-HGVS match for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=). Its seven submissions are all ordinary clinical-laboratory submissions (six Likely benign and one Benign); the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic assertion would be required to apply PP5.
Sources
BA1 Not met: highest population frequency is 0.0014% (gnomAD v4.1), far below the >1% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The highest reported population frequency is 1.42525e-05 overall in gnomAD v4.1 and 1.94928e-05 in the highest-frequency subpopulation, European (non-Finnish), far below the generic benign allele-frequency threshold of >1%. The variant is also absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP benign frequency rule: BA1 requires an allele frequency greater than 1% in a population database; apply the highest credible ancestry-specific frequency.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 23/1,613,754 alleles, allele frequency 1.42525e-05, with 0 homozygotes; the highest subpopulation frequency is 1.94928e-05 in European (non-Finnish) individuals.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 4/250,716 alleles, allele frequency 1.59543e-05, with 0 homozygotes; the highest subpopulation frequency is 3.53519e-05 in European (non-Finnish) individuals.
  • The generic operating threshold for BA1 is population frequency >1%; the observed frequency is several orders of magnitude lower. No MEN1-specific VCEP threshold was available.
Sources
BS1 Not met: highest observed subpopulation frequency is 0.0035%, far below the >0.3% BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The highest observed frequency is 1.94928e-05 in gnomAD v4.1 European (non-Finnish) individuals and 3.53519e-05 in gnomAD v2.1 European (non-Finnish) individuals, both far below the generic operating threshold of >0.3% for a frequency greater than expected for a pathogenic MEN1 variant. No disease-specific penetrance- or prevalence-adjusted threshold was available to justify a different cutoff.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS1 frequency rule: apply when the allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder; in this generic operating framework, use >0.3% and evaluate the highest credible ancestry-specific frequency.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports an overall allele frequency of 1.42525e-05 and a maximum subpopulation frequency of 1.94928e-05 in European (non-Finnish) individuals.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports an overall allele frequency of 1.59543e-05 and a maximum subpopulation frequency of 3.53519e-05 in European (non-Finnish) individuals.
  • The generic operating threshold for BS1 is >0.3%; the observed frequencies are far below that threshold.
Sources
BS2 Not met: gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 each report zero homozygotes, so no healthy homozygous adults are documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not met. gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 each report 0 homozygotes for the variant. No source documents the variant in healthy adult homozygotes, and the available population data do not provide the observation required for BS2.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS2 rule: requires observation of the variant in healthy adults, typically as homozygotes for a recessive disorder or heterozygotes/homozygotes as appropriate for the disease mechanism; absence of homozygotes is not itself BS2 evidence.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 1,613,754 alleles.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 250,716 alleles.
  • No healthy-adult homozygote observation or other BS2-qualifying population observation is present in the case evidence.
Sources
BP6 Not met: ClinVar holds no benign or likely benign expert-panel assertion for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 is not applicable because ClinVar has no exact-variant benign or likely benign expert-panel assertion.

Rule
This assessment applies BP6 only to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 457319 is an exact transcript-HGVS match for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=). Its six Likely benign and one Benign assertions are all single-submitter clinical-laboratory submissions, and the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion would be required to apply BP6.
Sources

Not assessed · 11 · no assessment recorded

PS2 Not assessed: no parental testing or other de novo evidence was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband-level de novo evidence is available in the case bundle. There is no documented parental testing showing the variant absent in both unaffected parents, no maternity/paternity confirmation, and no phenotype-specific de novo observation to evaluate.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2: de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history, with maternity and paternity confirmed; stronger application requires appropriate phenotype and, where applicable, multiple observations. No applicable MEN1-specific specification was found.
Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies the variant as NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1, but contains no proband pedigree, parental genotype results, or confirmed de novo observation.
  • ClinVar contains seven single-submitter classifications, but the bundle reports zero usable criterion-lead submissions and provides no family-level de novo evidence; these classifications were not used to infer PS2.
Still missing
  • Documented variant results for both biological parents
  • Confirmation of maternity and paternity
  • Proband phenotype and parental phenotype relevant to MEN1
PS3 Not assessed: no validated variant-specific functional assay showing a damaging effect was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No validated, variant-specific functional assay demonstrating a damaging effect was identified for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=). The available functional-themed publication is the general ACMG/AMP standards paper and does not report this variant or a MEN1 assay; therefore PS3 cannot be applied.

Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies no MEN1-specific or variant-specific functional assay for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=).
  • PMID:25741868 was reviewed for generic ACMG/AMP functional-evidence standards; its extracted text states that the approach applies broadly to Mendelian variants, but it does not mention MEN1 or this variant and provides no assay result.
  • The synonymous consequence and SpliceAI max delta score of 0.00 are not functional assay evidence and were not used to infer PS3.
Still missing
  • A variant-specific functional study is needed, with appropriate wild-type and disease-relevant controls, an assay readout tied to MEN1 biology, and sufficient replication to calibrate the result for PS3 strength.
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no case-control or enrichment data for this exact variant were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-control data or other quantitative enrichment data for the exact MEN1 c.300C>G (p.Ala100=) variant were identified in the supplied evidence.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS4: prevalence of the variant in affected individuals must be significantly increased relative to controls.
Evidence considered
  • The only pre-extracted paper prioritized for PS4 (PMID:20065170) does not mention MEN1 or the exact variant and supplies no variant-specific clinical data.
  • The ClinVar submission audit lists no usable criterion leads or validated PMID evidence for this exact variant.
Still missing
  • A variant-specific case-control or appropriately ascertained cohort dataset reporting affected and control allele counts is required to assess enrichment.
Sources
PM6 Not assessed: no de novo event or parental testing was reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No assumed de novo evidence is available. The case bundle does not report parental testing, a de novo event without confirmed maternity/paternity, or a compatible proband phenotype.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6: assumed de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history, without confirmation of maternity and/or paternity. No applicable MEN1-specific specification was found.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no parental testing or family-history data for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G.
  • No paper_extracts entry provides variant-specific de novo or family evidence; the available extracted papers are general guidance or unrelated to this variant.
Still missing
  • Parental genotype information
  • Evidence supporting biological parentage if de novo is suspected
  • Proband phenotype and family-history documentation
PP1 Not assessed: no segregation data from affected relatives were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected relatives, informative meioses, variant-positive relatives, or phenotype-consistent segregation data are reported. Therefore, segregation cannot be evaluated at supporting, moderate, or strong strength.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1: co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease; strength may be increased with sufficient informative meioses under an applicable validated framework. No applicable MEN1-specific specification was found.
Evidence considered
  • The case bundle provides no pedigree, affected-relative testing, meioses count, or segregation/non-segregation observations for this variant.
  • The available ClinVar data are aggregate submitter classifications and do not document family segregation; they were not treated as PP1 evidence.
Still missing
  • Pedigree with clinically evaluated relatives
  • Genotypes and phenotypes of informative relatives
  • Number of informative meioses and segregation observations
  • MEN1 phenotype consistency and age-appropriate evaluation in relatives
PP4 Not assessed: no proband phenotype data were available to evaluate phenotype specificity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband phenotype, clinical diagnostic findings, or phenotype-to-gene differential assessment is present for this case; therefore phenotype specificity cannot be evaluated.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP4: the patient's phenotype or family history must be highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Evidence considered
  • The supplied bundle contains variant normalization, database assertions, population data, and literature triage but no patient-level phenotype.
Still missing
  • Detailed proband phenotype and clinical evaluation, including whether the presentation is highly specific for MEN1 and whether plausible alternative genetic causes were assessed, are required.
BS3 Not assessed: no validated variant-specific functional assay demonstrating preserved function was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No validated, variant-specific functional assay demonstrating preserved MEN1 function was identified for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=). The available functional-themed publication is a general ACMG/AMP standards paper without a MEN1 assay or result for this variant; therefore BS3 cannot be applied.

Evidence considered
  • The case bundle contains no variant-specific functional result showing normal MEN1 activity for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=).
  • PMID:25741868 was reviewed for generic ACMG/AMP functional-evidence standards; its extracted text does not mention MEN1 or this variant and describes no functional experiment relevant to BS3.
  • The ClinVar benign/likely benign submissions and the absence of a predicted splice effect are not validated functional evidence and were not used to infer BS3.
Still missing
  • A variant-specific, biologically relevant functional study is needed to demonstrate preserved function using appropriate controls and a validated assay readout before BS3 can be considered.
Sources
BS4 Not assessed: no affected relatives tested and lacking the variant were documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected family members tested for the variant are documented as lacking the variant. In the absence of an informative pedigree and phenotype-confirmed relatives, non-segregation cannot be established.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4: lack of segregation in affected members of a family. Application requires informative affected relatives and reliable phenotype/genotype data. No applicable MEN1-specific specification was found.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no affected-relative genotype/phenotype pairs and no documented non-segregation observation.
  • Population frequency and ClinVar classification data do not establish BS4 and were not used for this criterion.
Still missing
  • Affected relatives with reliable clinical phenotyping
  • Variant test results for those affected relatives
  • Informative family structure and age-appropriate assessment
BP2 Not assessed: no phase or family-genotype evidence showed this variant in trans or cis with a pathogenic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No reliable phase or family-genotype evidence is available to determine whether NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=) occurs in trans with a pathogenic MEN1 variant or in cis with a pathogenic variant. The variant-specific literature extraction does not report such an observation.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP2: consider when the variant is observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in a fully penetrant dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant for any disorder; phase and pathogenicity of the comparator must be established.
Evidence considered
  • Generic ACMG/AMP BP2 requires a documented observation of the variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant disorder, or in cis with a pathogenic variant for any disorder.
  • The case bundle contains no affected-proband or unaffected-individual genotype, parental testing, segregation result, phase determination, or second pathogenic MEN1 variant for this variant.
  • The pre-computed extraction for PMID:25741868 provides general ACMG/AMP standards but no MEN1-specific or variant-specific phase evidence; it was consulted for the generic criterion framework.
Still missing
  • Need family or proband genotype data identifying a second pathogenic MEN1 variant and its phase relative to c.300C>G.
  • Need confirmation that any comparator pathogenic variant is truly pathogenic and that the observation is relevant to the MEN1 inheritance model.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no evidence of an alternate molecular diagnosis was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No patient-level evidence identifies an alternate molecular diagnosis that fully explains a presenting phenotype.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP5: a variant is found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
  • No proband phenotype, diagnostic workup, or alternate molecular finding is included in the supplied case-evidence bundle.
Still missing
  • A documented phenotype plus comprehensive molecular findings demonstrating an alternate cause that fully explains it are required to assess BP5.
BP7 Not assessed: no conservation evidence for the affected nucleotide was available, despite no predicted splice effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is synonymous and SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (maximum delta 0.00), satisfying the splice-prediction component of generic BP7. However, no nucleotide-conservation evidence was provided to establish that the affected nucleotide is not highly conserved, so BP7 cannot be assessed as met.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP7: synonymous variant with no predicted splice impact and a nucleotide that is not highly conserved.
Evidence considered
  • The case identifies NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G as a synonymous p.(Ala100=) variant and reports SpliceAI maximum delta score 0.00.
  • Under generic ACMG/AMP BP7, a synonymous variant requires both no predicted splice impact and evidence that the nucleotide is not highly conserved. The available evidence bundle supplies the first component but no conservation result.
Still missing
  • Obtain a nucleotide-conservation assessment for the c.300 reference position to determine whether it is not highly conserved, as required for generic BP7.
Sources
Not applicable · 9· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: synonymous substitution changes no amino acid, so no null-variant mechanism such as nonsense-mediated decay is triggered. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PS1 N/ANot applicable: synonymous change produces no altered amino acid (p.Ala100=) to compare with an established pathogenic missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, evaluated regardless of the underlying nucleotide change. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, no altered amino acid exists at this position to compare against any previously established pathogenic missense variant, so PS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM1 N/ANot applicable: synonymous substitution leaves the amino acid unchanged, so mutational hotspot or critical-domain membership cannot apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant located in a mutational hot spot and/or a critical, well-established functional domain without benign variation. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, no altered residue exists to evaluate for mutational hot-spot or critical-domain membership, so PM1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM3 N/ANot applicable: MEN1 disease here is autosomal dominant, and PM3 requires a recessive inheritance context. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

MEN1 is documented in this case as an autosomal-dominant disorder context, whereas PM3 is the recessive allelic evidence criterion. No recessive inheritance context or affected proband with this variant in trans with a pathogenic MEN1 variant is provided.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM3: apply only when the variant is observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder; not applicable in the documented autosomal-dominant MEN1 context.
Evidence considered
  • The case bundle reports no applicable MEN1-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework, so generic ACMG/AMP guidance was used.
  • Generic ACMG/AMP guidance defines PM3 as evidence for variants observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in recessive disease; the case contains no such recessive disease or phase observation for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G (p.Ala100=).
  • The case bundle provides no affected-proband, segregation, parental, phase, or second pathogenic MEN1-variant observation relevant to PM3.
Sources
PM4 N/ANot applicable: synonymous substitution causes no protein length change for PM4 to evaluate. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM5 N/ANot applicable: no missense change exists at this residue, so no pathogenic missense at the same position can be compared. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change has previously been determined to be pathogenic. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, no missense change exists at this residue to compare against a different pathogenic missense change at the same position, so PM5's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP2 N/ANot applicable: missense constraint is irrelevant because this is a synonymous substitution with no missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation, where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, the gene's missense-constraint properties are irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so PP2's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP1 N/ANot applicable: the gene's truncating-variant mechanism is irrelevant because no missense change is present (synonymous, p.Ala100=). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, the gene's truncating-variant mechanism is irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so BP1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: synonymous substitution causes no protein length change within a repetitive region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G in MEN1 is a synonymous (silent) substitution predicted to produce NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: synonymous (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
MEN1
Transcript
NM_001370259.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_001357188.2:p.(Ala100=)
GRCh38
chr11:64809810 G>C
GRCh37
chr11:64577282 G>C
Location and type
Exon 2 · synonymous
ClinVar
457319

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MEN1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_001370259.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MEN1NM_001370259.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 23 / 1,613,754 alleles AF 1.43e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 1.3e-05
gnomAD v2.1 4 / 250,716 alleles AF 1.6e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 1.13e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 1.4e-05 · 23 / 1,613,754 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 1.3e-05
European (non-Finnish)23 / 1,179,924 1.9e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 1.6e-05 · 4 / 250,716 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 1.1e-05
European (non-Finnish)4 / 113,148 3.5e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.42525e-05; MAF= 0.00143%, 23/1613754 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.94928e-05; MAF= 0.00195%, 23/1179924 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.298e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.59543e-05; MAF= 0.00160%, 4/250716 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 3.53519e-05; MAF= 0.00354%, 4/113148 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.126e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.006
Pangolin splice gain
0.002

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingMet (supporting): SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00, below the <0.10 BP4 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

MEN1 NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G is synonymous (p.Ala100=). SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, which is below the generic non-missense BP4 threshold of <0.10. BP4 is met at supporting strength; this uses the same splice-prediction evidence as PP3 and is not double-counted.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: for a synonymous/non-missense variant, use SpliceAI only; BP4_supporting requires maximum delta <0.10.
Evidence considered
  • No MEN1 VCEP/CSPEC or local gene-specific computational-evidence rule was retrieved; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback is governing.
  • The case SpliceAI result for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G has maximum delta score 0.00. The supplied generic non-missense rule assigns BP4_supporting when SpliceAI maximum delta is <0.10.
  • This is a synonymous, not missense, variant; the generic rule directs use of SpliceAI only for this path. No independent missense-predictor evidence is added.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.00, below the >0.20 PP3 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

MEN1 NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G is synonymous (p.Ala100=), so the generic non-missense splice-prediction path applies. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.00, below the generic PP3 threshold of >0.20; PP3 is therefore not met.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP fallback: for a synonymous/non-missense variant, use SpliceAI only; PP3_supporting requires maximum delta >0.20.
Evidence considered
  • No MEN1 VCEP/CSPEC or local gene-specific computational-evidence rule was retrieved; the generic ACMG/AMP fallback is governing.
  • The case SpliceAI result for NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G has maximum delta score 0.00. The supplied generic non-missense rule assigns PP3 only when SpliceAI maximum delta is >0.20.
  • The variant is synonymous, p.(Ala100=), rather than missense; REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable to this variant-type path. BayesDel is additionally not usable under the supplied generic fallback because no verified published calibration is available.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗
BP7 Not assessed: no conservation evidence for the affected nucleotide was available, despite no predicted splice effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is synonymous and SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (maximum delta 0.00), satisfying the splice-prediction component of generic BP7. However, no nucleotide-conservation evidence was provided to establish that the affected nucleotide is not highly conserved, so BP7 cannot be assessed as met.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP7: synonymous variant with no predicted splice impact and a nucleotide that is not highly conserved.
Evidence considered
  • The case identifies NM_001370259.2:c.300C>G as a synonymous p.(Ala100=) variant and reports SpliceAI maximum delta score 0.00.
  • Under generic ACMG/AMP BP7, a synonymous variant requires both no predicted splice impact and evidence that the nucleotide is not highly conserved. The available evidence bundle supplies the first component but no conservation result.
Still missing
  • Obtain a nucleotide-conservation assessment for the c.300 reference position to determine whether it is not highly conserved, as required for generic BP7.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

7 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Cited in the classification

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    The paper does not mention MEN1 or the exact variant c.300C>G / NP_001357188.2:p.(A100=). It presents general ACMG/AMP standards for classifying sequence variants in Mendelian genes, including guidance that variant assessment should consider the full body of evidence and that pathogenicity should not be inferred solely from computational predictions or variant nomenclature.
    → BP4 · supporting Does not name this variant
    PMID 25741868 ↗
    Source detail
    The variant classification approach described in this paper is meant to be applicable to variants in all Mendelian genes whether identified by single gene tests, multi-gene panels, exome sequencing or genome sequencing.

    Location Proposed Criteria for Interpretation of Sequence Variants

    Context ACMG/AMP/CAP workgroup consensus, laboratory surveys, workshop feedback, and review of existing variant-classification guidance; no MEN1-specific cohort or functional assay for this variant is described.

Other recorded publications

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    Robson ME et al. · 2010
    The paper does not mention MEN1, c.300C>G, or NP_001357188.2:p.(A100=), and provides no variant-specific functional, clinical, segregation, or population data relevant to this variant.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 20065170 ↗
  • Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.
    Adam MP et al. · 1993
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20301710 ↗
  • Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment and Counseling (PDQ®): Health Professional Versi
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 26389258 ↗
  • Genetics of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Neoplasias (PDQ®): Health Professional Version.
    PDQ Cancer Genetics Editorial Board · 2002
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 26389271 ↗
  • ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 35802134 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.42525e-05; MAF= 0.00143%, 23/1613754 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.94928e-05; MAF= 0.00195%, 23/1179924 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.298e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.59543e-05; MAF= 0.00160%, 4/250716 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 3.53519e-05; MAF= 0.00354%, 4/113148 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.126e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (6 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 457319)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.