0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

RUNX1 c.617dup, p.(His206GlnfsTer7)

NM_001754.4:c.617dup NP_001745.2:p.(His206GlnfsTer7) View identifiers
Classification
Pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Pathogenic.A pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About RUNX1

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen RUNX1 VCEP v3.1.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 3 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 3
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

This variant is a frameshift predicted to result in p.(His206GlnfsTer7), and loss of function is an established disease mechanism for RUNX1 in the MM-VCEP framework. The available PVS1 assessment supports full-strength PVS1 for this truncating variant.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the RUNX1 PM2_supporting threshold of 0.00005.

PM5Supporting
PM5 · supporting

The RUNX1 MM-VCEP specification permits PM5_supporting for nonsense or frameshift variants downstream of c.98 when PM1 is not applied and splicing is not predicted to be affected. This variant is c.617dup, PM1 is not met, and SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the 0.20 threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Pathogenic

RUNX1 MM-VCEP/CSPEC point-based Tavtigian framework v3.1.0: PVS1_VeryStrong (8) + PM2_Supporting (1) + PM5_Supporting (1) = 10 points, which meets the Pathogenic threshold (>=10).

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen RUNX1 VCEP v3.1.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 3 not met · 7 not assessed · 15 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The RUNX1 c.617dup (p.His206GlnfsTer7; p.H206Qfs*7) variant has not been reported in ClinVar, and OncoKB lists p.H206Qfs*7 as Likely Oncogenic with a likely loss-of-function effect.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which supports rarity in the general population and is below the RUNX1 PM2_supporting threshold of 0.00005.

This variant is a truncating frameshift, and the RUNX1 MM-VCEP framework recognizes loss of function as an established disease mechanism for RUNX1; the available PVS1 assessment supports full-strength PVS1 for this variant.

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the 0.20 threshold and is consistent with the RUNX1 PM5_supporting rule for downstream nonsense or frameshift variants.

Met · 3

PVS1 Very strongThis variant is a frameshift predicted to result in p.(His206GlnfsTer7), and loss of function is an established disease mechanism for RUNX1 in the MM-VCEP framework. The available PVS1 assessment supports full-strength PVS1 for this truncating variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PVS1 decision tree
Evidence considered
  • Frameshift consequence p.(His206GlnfsTer7)
  • RUNX1 loss of function established as disease mechanism
  • Variant-level PVS1 scaffold suggests default PVS1
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessment
PM2 SupportingThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the RUNX1 PM2_supporting threshold of 0.00005. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PM2_Supporting
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
  • PM2_supporting threshold <=0.00005
Sources
PM5 SupportingThe RUNX1 MM-VCEP specification permits PM5_supporting for nonsense or frameshift variants downstream of c.98 when PM1 is not applied and splicing is not predicted to be affected. This variant is c.617dup, PM1 is not met, and SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the 0.20 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PM5_Supporting for nonsense/frameshift variants downstream of c.98
Evidence considered
  • Variant is downstream of c.98
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.02
  • PM1 not met
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP allows PM5_Supporting for downstream nonsense/frameshift variants
Sources
cspec ↗spliceai ↗vcep_m_y_e_l_o_i_d___m_a_l_i_g_n_a_n_c_y___v_c_e_p___r_u_n_x_1___p_i_l_o_t___r_e_s_u_l_t_s

Not met · 3 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM1 This variant affects His206, which lies outside the RUNX1 residues eligible for PM1. The RUNX1 PM1 region is limited to residues 89-204, with a stronger subset at 13 specified residues, so PM1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PM1
Evidence considered
  • Protein change p.(His206GlnfsTer7)
  • RUNX1 PM1 region limited to residues 89-204
Sources
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the RUNX1 BA1 threshold of 0.0015 in a continental population and does not meet the requirement for at least 5 observed alleles. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BA1
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
  • BA1 threshold >=0.0015 with >=5 alleles
Sources
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the RUNX1 BS1 frequency range of 0.00015 to 0.0015 and does not meet the requirement for at least 5 observed alleles. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BS1
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1
  • BS1 threshold 0.00015-0.0015 with >=5 alleles
Sources

Not assessed · 7 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity and paternity established was identified, so PS2 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PS2 requires confirmed de novo occurrence(s)
Evidence considered
  • No confirmed de novo evidence identified
Still missing
  • Confirmed de novo data in a patient with RUNX1-related phenotype
PS4 No proband-level evidence meeting the RUNX1 PS4 thresholds was identified, so PS4 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PS4 requires 1 or more qualifying probands
Evidence considered
  • No ClinVar submission identified for this variant
  • No qualifying proband count identified
Still missing
  • Proband-level observations in patients meeting RUNX1 phenotypic criteria
Sources
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrences were identified, so PM6 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PM6 requires assumed de novo occurrence(s)
Evidence considered
  • No assumed de novo evidence identified
Still missing
  • Assumed de novo occurrence data in patients with RUNX1-related phenotype
PP1 No segregation data were identified, so PP1 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PP1 requires 3 or more informative meioses
Evidence considered
  • No informative segregation evidence identified
Still missing
  • Informative family segregation data
BS3 Available evidence does not include qualifying variant-specific studies showing normal RUNX1 function, so BS3 cannot be applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BS3 requires normal transactivation with supporting secondary data or normal transactivation alone for BS3_Supporting
Evidence considered
  • No qualifying normal-function assay identified for this variant
Still missing
  • Variant-specific functional studies showing normal transactivation
  • Secondary assay showing normal function
Sources
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified in informative meioses, so BS4 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BS4 requires at least 2 informative meioses
Evidence considered
  • No informative non-segregation evidence identified
Still missing
  • Segregation data showing lack of co-segregation in 2 or more informative meioses
BP2 No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic RUNX1 variant or in cis with a pathogenic variant, so BP2 cannot be assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Original ACMG/AMP BP2 as adopted by RUNX1 MM-VCEP
Evidence considered
  • No cis/trans observation identified
Still missing
  • Phase data with a pathogenic variant
Not applicable · 15· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/APS1 is intended for the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. This variant is a frameshift and does not fit that evidence model. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PS1
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is frameshift
Sources
PS3 N/AThe RUNX1 MM-VCEP specification states that PS3 is not applied when a variant already meets PVS1. This variant meets PVS1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PS3 caveat
Evidence considered
  • Variant meets PVS1
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP excludes PS3 when PVS1 is applied
Sources
PM3 N/APM3 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: PM3 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks PM3 as not applicable
Sources
PM4 N/APM4 in the RUNX1 specification applies to in-frame insertions or deletions and stop-loss variants. This variant is a frameshift, so PM4 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PM4
Evidence considered
  • Variant is a frameshift
  • not an in-frame indel or stop-loss
Sources
PP2 N/APP2 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: PP2 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks PP2 as not applicable
Sources
PP3 N/APP3 in the RUNX1 specification is used for missense, synonymous, and selected intronic variants, and not for canonical splice variants. This frameshift variant is not eligible for PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PP3
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is frameshift
Sources
PP4 N/AThe RUNX1 MM-VCEP specification states that PP4 should not be used because the FPD/AML phenotype is not sufficiently specific for a single genetic etiology. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: PP4 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks PP4 as not applicable
Sources
PP5 N/APP5 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: PP5 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks PP5 as not applicable
Sources
BS2 N/ABS2 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: BS2 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks BS2 as not applicable
Sources
BP1 N/ABP1 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: BP1 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks BP1 as not applicable
Sources
BP3 N/ABP3 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: BP3 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks BP3 as not applicable
Sources
BP4 N/ABP4 in the RUNX1 specification is used for missense, synonymous, and intronic variants. This frameshift variant is not eligible for BP4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BP4
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is frameshift
Sources
BP5 N/ABP5 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: BP5 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks BP5 as not applicable
Sources
BP6 N/ABP6 is not used by this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP: BP6 not applicable
Evidence considered
  • RUNX1 MM-VCEP marks BP6 as not applicable
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 applies to synonymous and intronic variants. This frameshift variant is not eligible for BP7. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BP7
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is frameshift
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
RUNX1
Transcript
NM_001754.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_001754.4:c.617dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_001745.2:p.(His206GlnfsTer7)
GRCh38
chr21:34834597 A>AT
GRCh37
chr21:36206894 A>AT

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in RUNX1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_001754.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

RUNX1NM_001754.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/APP3 in the RUNX1 specification is used for missense, synonymous, and selected intronic variants, and not for canonical splice variants. This frameshift variant is not eligible for PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP PP3
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is frameshift
Sources
BP4 N/ABP4 in the RUNX1 specification is used for missense, synonymous, and intronic variants. This frameshift variant is not eligible for BP4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BP4
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is frameshift
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 applies to synonymous and intronic variants. This frameshift variant is not eligible for BP7. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
RUNX1 MM-VCEP BP7
Evidence considered
  • Variant class is frameshift
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

Functional

OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.