0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

RAD51D c.270_271dup, p.(Lys91IlefsTer13)

NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13) Frameshift · exon 4 View identifiers
Classification
Pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Pathogenic.A pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About RAD51D

RAD51D encodes a protein that works with other DNA-repair proteins to help accurately repair broken DNA through homologous recombination. Inherited changes in RAD51D increase the risk of ovarian cancer and may also increase breast cancer risk. RAD51D acts as a tumor-suppressor gene, and changes in it can contribute to chromosome instability and, rarely, resistance to chemotherapy in cancer cells.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 3 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 3
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

Met, very strong: exon 4 frameshift Lys91IlefsTer13 truncates RAD51D at amino acid 103 of 329 and is expected to trigger NMD.

PS3Strong
PS3 · strong

Met, strong: RAD51D K91fs reduced homologous-recombination repair and RAD51D stability across orthogonal assays with wild-type controls and three biological replicates.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at supporting strength: aggregate allele frequency was 1.35305e-05 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, below the 0.0001 PM2 threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Pathogenic

Pathogenic: PVS1 (very strong) plus PS3 (strong) satisfy the generic ACMG/AMP Pathogenic combination; PM2 (supporting) is additionally met.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
26 / 1,547,768 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 26 / 1,547,768 alleles. Recorded AF 1.67984e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 5.56775e-05; MAF= 0.00557%, 14/251448 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000761118; MAF= 0.07611%, 14/18394 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00045935.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.151 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.151. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
16 reported laboratory submissions

13 Pathogenic · 2 Likely pathogenic · 1 pathogenic.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 6 not met · 9 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No applicable RAD51D-specific VCEP specification was identified, so generic ACMG/AMP criteria were used.

The available evidence does not provide confirmed de novo testing, apparently de novo occurrence, affected-family cosegregation, or family-based non-segregation for this variant.

The exact variant-level observation in one cancer-naive control was considered but does not support PP1 or BS4.

Population assessment used the available non-cancer subsets where provided: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes; gnomAD v4.1 all-comers remained the default comparison because no governing VCEP specified an alternative.

The variant is rare in aggregate population data, with no observed homozygotes; the maximum subgroup frequencies are ancestry-specific observations from small denominators and do not reach the supplied BA1 or BS1 thresholds.

Met · 3

PVS1 Very strongMet, very strong: exon 4 frameshift Lys91IlefsTer13 truncates RAD51D at amino acid 103 of 329 and is expected to trigger NMD. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

RAD51D loss of function is an established germline disease mechanism, and no RAD51D-specific CSPEC/VCEP or local PVS1 specification is available; therefore the ClinGen SVI generic PVS1 framework applies. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup is a coding frameshift in exon 4 (exon c.264-345), producing NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). The predicted termination at amino acid 103 truncates the 329-amino-acid protein, eliminating approximately 69% of the normal sequence. Because the premature termination occurs in an internal exon, well upstream of the final exon-exon junction, the transcript is expected to be subject to nonsense-mediated decay rather than escape it. The affected exon is part of the established coding transcript, the consequence is not a canonical splice-site change, and no evidence indicates a non-critical distal region or repeat-region context that would warrant downgrading. Under PMC6185798, this supports full-strength PVS1, whose literal strength tier is very strong.

Rule
ClinGen SVI generic PVS1 framework (PMC6185798): established loss-of-function mechanism plus an early truncating frameshift in an internal, biologically relevant exon with predicted NMD supports full-strength PVS1.
Evidence considered
  • The gene-level assessment establishes RAD51D loss of function as a germline disease mechanism and identifies the PVS1 gene gate as eligible.
  • The normalized consequence is NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup, a frameshift producing NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13).
  • The transcript exon map places c.270_271dup in exon 4, spanning coding c.264-345; the final exon begins at coding c.904, so the premature stop is in an internal exon and far upstream of the terminal exon-exon junction, supporting NMD.
  • The normal protein is 329 amino acids and the predicted product ends at amino acid 103, removing approximately 226 amino acids or 69% of the protein.
  • The generic ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework in PMC6185798 supports full-strength PVS1 for a truncating variant when loss of function is an established disease mechanism, absent NMD-escape, non-critical-region, transcript-relevance, or other specified downgrade concerns.
  • PMID:23372765 explicitly reports the corresponding RAD51D p.(Lys91Ilefs*13) truncating mutation in exon 4, confirming the variant-level frameshift and transcript context.
Sources
pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentpvs1_generic_framework ↗PMID:23372765 ↗
PS3 StrongMet, strong: RAD51D K91fs reduced homologous-recombination repair and RAD51D stability across orthogonal assays with wild-type controls and three biological replicates. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS3 is met at strong strength. No RAD51D-specific VCEP specification was available, so generic ACMG/AMP functional-evidence calibration applies. Ma et al. (PMID:33151324) evaluated the recurrent RAD51D K91fs variant, reported as 271_272insTA and equivalent to the case variant's normalized p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), in multiple orthogonal cell-based assays. Compared with RAD51D wild-type and empty-vector controls, K91fs reduced homologous-recombination repair in a DR-GFP reporter assay, impaired RAD51 recruitment to DNA-damage sites, failed to reduce gamma-H2AX foci after cisplatin treatment, reduced RAD51D protein stability, and increased olaparib sensitivity. The DR-GFP and gamma-H2AX experiments used three biological replicates with reported means and standard deviations and statistical testing; the assays directly interrogated RAD51D function and its established homologous-recombination role. This concordant, biologically relevant, multi-assay loss-of-function pattern supports strong PS3, although the publication uses the alternate insertion notation rather than the current transcript-level HGVS description.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS3: well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect; strong strength is justified here by concordant results from multiple orthogonal, biologically relevant assays with wild-type/empty-vector controls and replicated quantitative measurements.
Evidence considered
  • The case variant normalizes to NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13); PMID:33151324 evaluates RAD51D K91fs reported as 271_272insTA, the equivalent recurrent frameshift allele.
  • In the DR-GFP reporter assay, RAD51D K91fs decreased GFP-positive cells compared with RAD51D wild type, indicating impaired homologous-recombination repair.
  • In cisplatin-treated cells, RAD51D K91fs did not produce the wild-type reduction in gamma-H2AX foci, and mutant cells showed impaired RAD51 recruitment to DNA-damage sites.
  • RAD51D K91fs had lower protein stability than wild type in cycloheximide time-course immunoblotting and increased olaparib sensitivity in BRCA-proficient TNBC cell lines.
  • The DR-GFP and gamma-H2AX quantitative experiments used three biological replicates, means plus standard deviations, and two-tailed unpaired Student's t-tests; assays included wild-type and empty-vector controls.
  • The functional endpoints are biologically relevant because RAD51D is an essential component of homologous-recombination repair, the established disease-relevant mechanism for RAD51D loss of function.
Sources
PM2 SupportingMet at supporting strength: aggregate allele frequency was 1.35305e-05 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, below the 0.0001 PM2 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable gene-specific population specification was available, so the supplied generic PM2 supporting threshold of allele frequency <=0.0001 was used. The variant is rare but observed: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes AF 5.90942e-05, gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes AF 1.35305e-05, and gnomAD v4.1 all-comers AF 1.67984e-05; all are below 0.0001. The maximum reported subgroup frequencies (0.00806452 in EAS_JPN for gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer and 0.00490196 in 1KG:JPT for gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer) are ancestry-specific small-subgroup observations and remain below the supplied PM2 threshold only for the aggregate dataset; therefore PM2 is supported by the aggregate population frequencies, with the subgroup values documented as a threshold artifact requiring caution. No homozygotes were observed.

Rule
Generic PM2: allele frequency <=0.0001, applied at supporting strength; governing VCEP precedence does not apply.
Evidence considered
  • No applicable RAD51D VCEP/CSPEC population rule was available; the supplied generic PM2 threshold is allele frequency <=0.0001 at supporting strength.
  • The relevant non-cancer datasets show aggregate AF 5.90942e-05 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and 1.35305e-05 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes; both are below 0.0001.
  • The default gnomAD v4.1 all-comers aggregate AF is 1.67984e-05, also below 0.0001, with zero homozygotes.
  • Ancestry-specific subgroup frequencies are higher because of small subgroup denominators, including 0.00806452 in EAS_JPN and 0.00490196 in 1KG:JPT; these are documented threshold artifacts and do not replace the aggregate frequencies for the generic rule absent a governing VCEP specification.
Sources
gnomad_v2 ↗gnomad_v4 ↗generic_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PP5 Not met: ClinVar shows laboratory Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic submissions, but zero expert-panel classifications are present for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact variant is present in ClinVar as Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic in laboratory submissions, but the record has zero expert-panel submissions and is classified as criteria provided, single submitter. Under the specified rule, ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions cannot trigger PP5.

Evidence considered
  • ClinVar exact-variant record NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.270_271dup (p.Lys91fs) reports Pathogenic and Likely pathogenic laboratory submissions with review status criteria provided, single submitter.
  • The ClinVar record reports zero expert-panel submissions; therefore the required exact-variant expert-panel classification for PP5 is absent.
  • Non-expert laboratory submissions and aggregate ClinVar labels were not used to trigger PP5.
Sources
BA1 Not met: the highest observed allele frequency was 0.00806452, below the 0.05 BA1 stand-alone threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable gene-specific population specification was available, so the supplied generic ACMG/AMP BA1 threshold of allele frequency >=0.05 was used. The highest reported frequency is below this threshold in every relevant dataset: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes total AF 5.90942e-05, maximum reported subpopulation AF 0.00806452 in EAS_JPN; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes total AF 1.35305e-05, maximum reported subpopulation AF 0.00490196 in 1KG:JPT; and gnomAD v4.1 all-comers total AF 1.67984e-05, maximum reported subpopulation AF 0.000583614. Therefore BA1 is not met.

Rule
Generic BA1: allele frequency >=0.05; governing VCEP precedence does not apply.
Evidence considered
  • No applicable RAD51D VCEP/CSPEC population rule was available; the supplied generic ACMG/AMP BA1 threshold is allele frequency >=0.05.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes reported AF 5.90942e-05 overall and maximum subpopulation AF 0.00806452 in EAS_JPN, both below 0.05.
  • gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes reported AF 1.35305e-05 overall and maximum subpopulation AF 0.00490196 in 1KG:JPT, while gnomAD v4.1 all-comers reported AF 1.67984e-05 overall and maximum subpopulation AF 0.000583614; none reaches 0.05.
Sources
gnomad_v2 ↗gnomad_v4 ↗generic_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗
BS1 Not met: the highest observed allele frequency was 0.00806452, below the 0.01 BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable gene-specific population specification was available, so the supplied generic BS1 threshold of allele frequency >=0.01 was used. The highest reported frequency is 0.00806452 in the EAS_JPN subgroup of gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes, below 0.01; the corresponding maximum in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes is 0.00490196 in 1KG:JPT, and gnomAD v4.1 all-comers has a maximum reported subpopulation AF of 0.000583614. The variant therefore does not meet BS1.

Rule
Generic BS1: allele frequency >=0.01; governing VCEP precedence does not apply.
Evidence considered
  • No applicable RAD51D VCEP/CSPEC population rule was available; the supplied generic BS1 threshold is allele frequency >=0.01.
  • Using the available non-cancer datasets, gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes had maximum subpopulation AF 0.00806452 in EAS_JPN and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes had maximum subpopulation AF 0.00490196 in 1KG:JPT; both are below 0.01.
  • The default all-comers gnomAD v4.1 dataset had maximum reported subpopulation AF 0.000583614, also below 0.01.
Sources
gnomad_v2 ↗gnomad_v4 ↗generic_acmg_combination_rulesPMID:25741868 ↗
BS2 Not met: homozygotes were absent from all gnomAD datasets, and the control study reported only one heterozygote among 466 individuals. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 requires observation of the variant in healthy adult individuals in a state inconsistent with the disease mechanism, classically homozygous for a dominant loss-of-function disorder. The variant has zero homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes, gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, and gnomAD v4.1. A directly relevant study found the heterozygous truncating variant in one of 466 cancer-naive controls (0.21%), but this is not a homozygous observation and does not satisfy BS2. Accordingly, BS2 is not met.

Rule
Generic BS2: observation in healthy adults in a state inconsistent with the disease mechanism; no homozygous observations were found.
Evidence considered
  • The supplied population data report zero homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes, gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, and gnomAD v4.1.
  • PMID:23372765 directly reports p.(Lys91Ilefs*13) in one of 466 cancer-naive control samples (0.21%), which is a heterozygous control observation rather than the homozygous healthy-adult observation required for BS2.
Sources
BS3 Not met: RAD51D K91fs showed reduced homologous-recombination repair and protein stability rather than preserved function in assays with wild-type controls. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS3 is not met. The available functional evidence does not demonstrate a normal or benign effect for this variant. Instead, PMID:33151324 directly assessed the equivalent RAD51D K91fs allele and found reduced homologous-recombination repair, impaired RAD51 recruitment, reduced RAD51D protein stability, and increased olaparib sensitivity relative to wild-type controls. No validated assay showing preserved RAD51D function with appropriate controls was identified; therefore BS3 cannot be applied.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS3: well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function or a validated functional assay; not satisfied when the available assay results show loss of function.
Evidence considered
  • No validated benign or normal-function assay result was identified for the equivalent RAD51D K91fs allele.
  • The available assays instead showed reduced homologous-recombination repair, impaired DNA-damage response, reduced protein stability, and increased olaparib sensitivity compared with RAD51D wild type.
  • Because BS3 requires well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect, the observed loss-of-function pattern is inconsistent with BS3.
Sources
BP6 Not met: no exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification is present; available submissions are non-expert laboratory assertions. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact variant has ClinVar laboratory Pathogenic and Likely pathogenic submissions, not an expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification. The record has zero expert-panel submissions. Under the specified rule, ordinary submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions cannot trigger BP6.

Evidence considered
  • ClinVar exact-variant record NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.270_271dup (p.Lys91fs) contains Pathogenic and Likely pathogenic laboratory submissions and no Benign or Likely benign expert-panel classification.
  • The ClinVar record reports zero expert-panel submissions, so the required exact-variant expert-panel evidence for BP6 is absent.
  • Non-expert laboratory submissions and aggregate ClinVar labels were not used to trigger BP6.
Sources

Not assessed · 9 · no assessment recorded

PS2 Not assessed: no verified parental testing or confirmed de novo occurrence is documented for the proband. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS2 cannot be assessed because the available evidence does not document a confirmed de novo occurrence in the proband, including verified maternity/paternity and parental testing results. No proband phenotype, parental genotype, or de novo confirmation details are provided for this variant.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2: de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history, with maternity/paternity confirmed; strength depends on the quality and extent of de novo evidence.
Evidence considered
  • No case-specific parental genotype results or confirmed de novo finding are available for evaluation.
Still missing
  • Confirmed maternity and paternity
  • Parental testing results for NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup
  • Proband phenotype and clinical context
PS4 Not assessed: available studies report gene-level enrichment or case prevalence, but no qualifying exact-variant case-control comparison establishes PS4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable RAD51D VCEP framework was available, so generic ACMG/AMP guidance was used. The literature includes gene-level case-control enrichment of inactivating RAD51D mutations (8/911 breast-ovarian cancer families versus 1/1,060 controls, P=0.01; PMID:21822267), but the exact c.270_271dup variant is not identified in that study. The exact variant was reported in 1/466 cancer-naive controls (0.21%; PMID:23372765), while a K91fs report found the variant in 8/325 Chinese triple-negative breast cancer patients but did not provide a qualifying matched control comparison in the extracted evidence (PMID:33151324). Therefore, an exact-variant case-control enrichment meeting PS4 cannot be established from the available evidence.

Evidence considered
  • PMID:21822267 reports eight inactivating RAD51D mutations among 911 breast-ovarian cancer families versus one among 1,060 controls (P=0.01), but the exact c.270_271dup variant is not named.
  • PMID:23372765 explicitly reports p.(Lys91Ilefs*13), corresponding to this variant, in one of 466 cancer-naive control samples (0.21%); this is not an affected-case enrichment result.
  • PMID:33151324 reports K91fs in 8 of 325 Chinese triple-negative breast cancer patients, but the extracted evidence does not provide a qualifying matched control comparison for the exact variant.
  • No RAD51D-specific VCEP framework was available; no numeric PS4 threshold was supplied by an applicable governing source.
Still missing
  • A qualifying exact-variant case-control study with affected and control counts, statistical significance, and disease ascertainment is needed.
  • The governing source does not provide a RAD51D-specific PS4 rule or numeric threshold.
Sources
PM3 Not assessed: no affected-proband observation, second pathogenic RAD51D allele, or confirmed trans phase is documented for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable RAD51D-specific VCEP or CSPEC specification was available, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework was used. PM3 requires evidence that the variant is present in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in an affected individual, with strength determined by the quality and number of biallelic observations. The available case evidence does not document an affected proband with a second pathogenic RAD51D allele, phase, compound heterozygosity, or a confirmed biallelic genotype. PMID:23372765 reports the exact variant p.(Lys91Ilefs*13) in one cancer-naive control sample but provides no trans/cis or affected-proband observation. Therefore PM3 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
generic_acmg_amp_PM3: pathogenic_variant_in_trans_with_the_tested_variant_in_an_affected_individual; strength depends_on_biallelic_observation_quality_and_number
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23372765 explicitly reports RAD51D p.(Lys91Ilefs*13), corresponding to c.270_271dup, in one of 466 cancer-naive control samples (0.21%), but reports no affected-proband biallelic observation or phase information.
  • The generic ACMG/AMP framework was used because no RAD51D-specific VCEP or CSPEC specification was available; PM3 requires allelic evidence such as a pathogenic variant in trans in an affected individual.
Still missing
  • Affected-proband data with a second pathogenic or likely pathogenic RAD51D variant are not documented.
  • Phase information establishing trans configuration is not documented.
  • No confirmed compound-heterozygous or other biallelic RAD51D genotype is documented.
Sources
PM6 Not assessed: no credible apparently de novo case without confirmed parental testing is documented for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM6 cannot be assessed because no credible clinical report documents this variant as apparently de novo without confirmed maternity and paternity. The available variant-specific literature does not provide an apparently de novo case with sufficient family-testing detail.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6: assumed de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease, without confirmation of maternity and paternity; evidence must still be credible and phenotype-consistent.
Evidence considered
  • No variant-specific apparently de novo observation with adequate parental information is available for evaluation.
Still missing
  • A published or clinical apparently de novo case report
  • Proband phenotype and clinical context
  • Available parental testing information
PP1 Not assessed: no affected-family cosegregation data are documented; one cancer-naive control observation is not segregation evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP1 cannot be assessed because no informative affected relatives, meioses, genotype-positive affected relatives, or quantitative cosegregation data are documented. PMID:23372765 reports the exact protein-level variant p.(Lys91Ilefs*13) in one of 466 cancer-naive controls (0.21%), but this is not evidence of cosegregation in an affected family and cannot establish PP1.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1: cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members; strength may increase with the number of informative meioses and the quality of phenotype and genotype data.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23372765 identifies p.(Lys91Ilefs*13), corresponding to this variant, in one of 466 cancer-naive control samples (0.21%), but does not report affected-family cosegregation for the variant.
  • No genotype-phenotype segregation series or informative meioses are available for this case.
Still missing
  • Number and phenotypes of informative affected relatives
  • Genotypes of affected and unaffected relatives
  • Number of informative meioses and cosegregation analysis
Sources
PP4 Not assessed: the available case evidence contains no patient phenotype or disease-specific clinical presentation for evaluating PP4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No patient phenotype, clinical presentation, or disease-specific diagnostic information is provided in the available case evidence. Consequently, the specificity of the patient's phenotype for a RAD51D-associated disorder cannot be evaluated under generic ACMG/AMP PP4 guidance.

Evidence considered
  • The available case evidence does not contain patient phenotype, clinical presentation, or diagnostic findings relevant to PP4.
  • No RAD51D-specific VCEP framework was available, so no gene-specific PP4 phenotype definition could be applied.
Still missing
  • Patient phenotype and confirmed clinical diagnosis are required.
  • A disease-specific phenotype definition or applicable RAD51D specification is unavailable.
BS4 Not assessed: no informative affected relatives or family non-segregation analysis is documented for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS4 cannot be assessed because no affected family members reported to carry or not carry the variant, and no informative non-segregation analysis, are documented. PMID:23372765 reports the exact variant-level protein consequence in a cancer-naive control, but an isolated control observation is not evidence that the variant fails to segregate with disease within a family.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4: lack of segregation in affected members of a family; isolated observations in unrelated controls do not establish BS4.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23372765 reports p.(Lys91Ilefs*13) in one cancer-naive control, but this observation does not establish family-based non-segregation or BS4.
  • No informative family members with phenotype and genotype data are available for BS4 assessment.
Still missing
  • Affected relatives tested for the variant
  • Unaffected relatives tested at appropriate ages
  • Family-based non-segregation analysis
Sources
BP2 Not assessed: no cis or trans phase with another pathogenic RAD51D variant is documented in an affected or unaffected individual. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable RAD51D-specific VCEP or CSPEC specification was available, so the generic ACMG/AMP framework was used. BP2 requires a documented allelic configuration involving the tested variant and a pathogenic variant, such as occurrence in trans in a fully penetrant dominant disorder or in cis in a recessive disorder, as applicable to the disease model. The available evidence contains no family-based or proband-level genotype data establishing cis or trans phase with another pathogenic RAD51D variant and no documented affected or unaffected individual in whom that configuration can be evaluated. PMID:23372765 reports the exact variant in a cancer-naive control sample but does not report a second pathogenic variant or phase. Therefore BP2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
generic_acmg_amp_BP2: variant_observed_in_trans_with_a_pathogenic_variant_for_a_fully_penetrant_dominant_disorder_or_in_cis_with_a_pathogenic_variant_for_a_recessive_disorder
Evidence considered
  • PMID:23372765 reports the exact RAD51D variant in one cancer-naive control sample but does not report a second pathogenic allele, cis/trans phase, or a genotype suitable for BP2 evaluation.
  • The generic ACMG/AMP framework was used because no RAD51D-specific VCEP or CSPEC specification was available; BP2 requires documented allelic configuration with another pathogenic variant under the applicable inheritance model.
Still missing
  • No documented second pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant for allelic comparison.
  • No cis/trans phase result is documented.
  • The relevant RAD51D inheritance configuration cannot be evaluated from the available individual-level data.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no alternate pathogenic molecular explanation or BP5-specific quantitative evidence is documented for this case. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable RAD51D VCEP framework was available. The available evidence does not document an alternate pathogenic molecular explanation in the patient, a confirmed pathogenic variant in another gene, or a qualifying BP5-specific likelihood-ratio or other numeric measurement. Therefore BP5 cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • The available case evidence does not document a pathogenic variant in another gene or another established molecular explanation for the patient's phenotype.
  • No RAD51D-specific VCEP framework or BP5-specific likelihood-ratio threshold was available.
Still missing
  • An applicable BP5 rule and evidence for an alternate pathogenic molecular explanation are needed.
  • No BP5-specific numeric threshold or governing publication is available.
Not applicable · 10· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/APS1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, evaluated regardless of the underlying nucleotide change. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, no altered amino acid exists at this position to compare against any previously established pathogenic missense variant, so PS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM1 N/APM1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant located in a mutational hot spot and/or a critical, well-established functional domain without benign variation. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, no altered residue exists to evaluate for mutational hot-spot or critical-domain membership, so PM1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM4 N/APM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM5 N/APM5 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change has previously been determined to be pathogenic. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, no missense change exists at this residue to compare against a different pathogenic missense change at the same position, so PM5's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP2 N/APP2 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation, where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, the gene's missense-constraint properties are irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so PP2's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP3 N/ANot applicable: the variant is a frameshift, outside PP3 scope for missense and splice-region/intronic computational evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not applicable because NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup is normalized as NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), a frameshift variant that changes protein length. PP3 is restricted here to missense or splice-region/intronic variants; therefore SpliceAI and missense-predictor evidence must not be evaluated for this criterion.

Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), explicitly classified as a frameshift.
  • PP3 scope excludes frameshift, nonsense, and other truncating or protein-length-changing variants; predictor scores were therefore not evaluated.
BP1 N/ABP1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, the gene's truncating-variant mechanism is irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so BP1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ABP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP4 N/ANot applicable: the variant is a frameshift, outside BP4 scope for missense and splice-region/intronic computational evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is not applicable because NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup is normalized as NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), a frameshift variant that changes protein length. BP4 is restricted here to missense or splice-region/intronic variants; therefore SpliceAI and missense-predictor evidence must not be evaluated for this criterion.

Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), explicitly classified as a frameshift.
  • BP4 scope excludes frameshift, nonsense, and other truncating or protein-length-changing variants; predictor scores were therefore not evaluated.
BP7 N/ABP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
RAD51D
Transcript
NM_002878.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13)
GRCh38
chr17:35107439 T>TTA
GRCh37
chr17:33434458 T>TTA
Location and type
Exon 4 · frameshift
ClinVar
239394, 182848

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in RAD51D, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_002878.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

RAD51DNM_002878.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 26 / 1,547,768 alleles AF 1.68e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0.000408
gnomAD v2.1 14 / 251,448 alleles AF 5.57e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 0.000459
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 1.7e-05 · 26 / 1,547,768 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 0.00041
East Asian26 / 44,550 0.00058
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American, European (non-Finnish).

gnomAD v2.1

AF 5.6e-05 · 14 / 251,448 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 0.00046
East Asian14 / 18,394 0.00076
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.67984e-05; MAF= 0.00168%, 26/1547768 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000583614; MAF= 0.05836%, 26/44550 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00040821.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 5.56775e-05; MAF= 0.00557%, 14/251448 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000761118; MAF= 0.07611%, 14/18394 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00045935.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +8 bp
0.113
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -317 bp
0.001
SpliceAI donor lossat -73 bp
0.151
SpliceAI donor gainat +71 bp
0.002
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.216
Pangolin splice gain
0.013

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/ANot applicable: the variant is a frameshift, outside PP3 scope for missense and splice-region/intronic computational evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not applicable because NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup is normalized as NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), a frameshift variant that changes protein length. PP3 is restricted here to missense or splice-region/intronic variants; therefore SpliceAI and missense-predictor evidence must not be evaluated for this criterion.

Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), explicitly classified as a frameshift.
  • PP3 scope excludes frameshift, nonsense, and other truncating or protein-length-changing variants; predictor scores were therefore not evaluated.
BP4 N/ANot applicable: the variant is a frameshift, outside BP4 scope for missense and splice-region/intronic computational evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is not applicable because NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup is normalized as NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), a frameshift variant that changes protein length. BP4 is restricted here to missense or splice-region/intronic variants; therefore SpliceAI and missense-predictor evidence must not be evaluated for this criterion.

Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13), explicitly classified as a frameshift.
  • BP4 scope excludes frameshift, nonsense, and other truncating or protein-length-changing variants; predictor scores were therefore not evaluated.
BP7 N/ABP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_002878.4:c.270_271dup in RAD51D is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002869.3:p.(Lys91IlefsTer13). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.15).

7 paper records listed. 2 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Analysis of RAD51D in ovarian cancer patients and families with a history of ovarian or breast cancer.
    Thompson ER et al. · 2013
    The paper explicitly identifies the corresponding RAD51D p.(Lys91Ilefs*13) truncating mutation in one of 466 cancer-naive control samples and places it in exon 4; this directly corroborates the variant's frameshift consequence and transcript context.
    → PVS1 · very strong Names this variant
    PMID 23372765 ↗
    Source detail
    A third truncating mutation, p.(Lys91Ilefs*13), was identified in one of 466 control samples (0.21%). All three of these mutations have previously been reported [3,4].

    Location Results and Discussion, paragraph 1; Table 2, Exon 4

    Context RAD51D mutation screening in 466 cancer-naive control DNA samples, following analysis of 245 unselected ovarian cancer cases and 1,060 familial breast/ovarian cancer index cases; variant positions were referenced to NM_002878.3 and NP_002869.

  • Molecular Features and Functional Implications of Germline Variants in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    The study reports that RAD51D K91fs (271_272insTA), corresponding to the case variant's p.Lys91IlefsTer13 allele, impaired homologous-recombination repair, reduced RAD51 recruitment to DNA-damage sites, decreased RAD51D protein stability, and increased sensitivity to olaparib in cell-based assays.
    → PS3 · strong Names this variant
    PMID 33151324 ↗
    Source detail
    In a direct repeat GFP (DR-GFP) reporter assay, expression of both RAD51D V200X and K91fs variant resulted in a decrease in GFP-positive cell numbers compared to its WT counterpart. ... In summary, these results unambiguously show that RAD51D recurrent variants negatively impact DNA homologous recombination.

    Location Results, 'RAD51D recurrent variants and DNA homologous recombination'; Figure 5C-F; Results, 'Effect of RAD51D recurrent variants on the expression level and stability of the RAD51D protein'; Figure 6A-B

    Context FUSCCTNBC cohort of 325 Chinese patients with triple-negative breast cancer; RAD51D K91fs was tested in U2OS DR-GFP homologous-recombination assays, gamma-H2AX and RAD51-recruitment assays in HEK293T-derived systems, cycloheximide protein-stability assays, and olaparib viability assays in MDA-MB-231 and BT549 TNBC cell lines. Quantitative DR-GFP and gamma-H2AX results used three biological replicates with wild-type and empty-vector controls.

Other recorded publications

  • Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer.
    Loveday C et al. · 2011
    This study identified eight inactivating RAD51D mutations in 911 breast-ovarian cancer families compared with one inactivating mutation in 1,060 controls, with P=0.01, supporting gene-level case-control enrichment; the exact c.270_271dup variant was not explicitly reported.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 21822267 ↗
    Quoted passage
    We identified eight inactivating RAD51D mutations in unrelated individuals from 911 breast-ovarian cancer families compared with one inactivating mutation identified in 1,060 controls (P = 0.01).

    Abstract

  • Loss of function germline mutations in RAD51D in women with ovarian carcinoma.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 22986143 ↗
  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Prevalence of disease-causing genes in Japanese patients with BRCA1/2-wildtype hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 32566746 ↗
  • ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23788249 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.67984e-05; MAF= 0.00168%, 26/1547768 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000583614; MAF= 0.05836%, 26/44550 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00040821.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 5.56775e-05; MAF= 0.00557%, 14/251448 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000761118; MAF= 0.07611%, 14/18394 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00045935.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (13 clinical laboratories) and as Likely pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories) and as pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 239394)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.15).

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.