0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

FLT3 c.1732_1797dup, p.(Met578_Tyr599dup)

NM_004119.2:c.1732_1797dup NP_004110.2:p.(Met578_Tyr599dup) View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About FLT3

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Local FLT3 ITD / activating length-mutation framework. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 3 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 3
PM1Moderate
PM1 · moderate

This variant is an in-frame tandem duplication, p.Met578_Tyr599dup, in the FLT3 juxtamembrane ITD hotspot region. The duplicated segment spans codons 578-599 and includes the classic activating codon 589-599 cluster, where recurrent FLT3 ITDs have been reported; this supports PM1 at Moderate strength under the local FLT3 framework.

PM2Moderate
PM2 · moderate

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0, which is below the default PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%. This rarity supports PM2.

PM5Moderate
PM5 · moderate

This variant is a novel in-frame FLT3 tandem duplication in the established juxtamembrane activating ITD hotspot class. The exact duplicated sequence has not been individually curated in ClinVar or OncoKB, but the event is an ITD-class analogue spanning the classic codon 589-599 hotspot, where pathogenic/oncogenic FLT3 ITDs and activating length mutations are already established; this meets the local FLT3-specific PM5 rule at Moderate strength.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

Applied the Local FLT3 ITD / activating length-mutation framework from final_classification_framework.json; this framework retains ACMG/AMP 2015 final category thresholds while using FLT3-specific criterion specifications.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB oncogenicity for this specific variant: not classified (variant has not been individually curated).

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Local FLT3 ITD / activating length-mutation framework, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 5 not met · 13 not assessed · 7 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The FLT3 c.1732_1797dup (p.Met578_Tyr599dup) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, with an observed population frequency of 0, which is below the default PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%.

The duplicated segment spans the FLT3 juxtamembrane ITD hotspot and includes the classic codon 589-599 activating cluster, which supports hotspot-class evidence, but no exact-variant OncoKB functional assertion was identified for p.Met578_Tyr599dup.

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.18.

Met · 3

PM1 ModerateThis variant is an in-frame tandem duplication, p.Met578_Tyr599dup, in the FLT3 juxtamembrane ITD hotspot region. The duplicated segment spans codons 578-599 and includes the classic activating codon 589-599 cluster, where recurrent FLT3 ITDs have been reported; this supports PM1 at Moderate strength under the local FLT3 framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Apply PM1_Moderate to an in-frame FLT3 internal tandem duplication that maps to the juxtamembrane activating hotspot region, especially codons 589-599.
Evidence considered
  • Mutalyzer/VariantValidator normalized the event as a duplicated reference interval
  • protein consequence p.(Met578_Tyr599dup) in exon 14 juxtamembrane region
  • local FLT3 framework defines codons 589-599 as the canonical activating hotspot
Sources
prefetchvcep_f_l_t_3___i_t_d___h_o_t_s_p_o_t___a_n_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_nPMID:9737679 ↗PMID:11090077 ↗PMID:11756186 ↗
PM2 ModerateThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0, which is below the default PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%. This rarity supports PM2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Default rarity threshold used: PM2 when population frequency is <0.1%.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent
  • gnomAD v4.1: absent
Sources
PM5 ModerateThis variant is a novel in-frame FLT3 tandem duplication in the established juxtamembrane activating ITD hotspot class. The exact duplicated sequence has not been individually curated in ClinVar or OncoKB, but the event is an ITD-class analogue spanning the classic codon 589-599 hotspot, where pathogenic/oncogenic FLT3 ITDs and activating length mutations are already established; this meets the local FLT3-specific PM5 rule at Moderate strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Apply PM5_Moderate to a novel FLT3 in-frame internal tandem duplication or activating length mutation in the established juxtamembrane ITD hotspot class, particularly codons 589-599.
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
  • OncoKB did not identify exact-variant curation
  • local FLT3 framework extends PM5 to novel ITD / activating length-mutation events in the same established hotspot class
Sources
clinvar ↗oncokb ↗vcep_f_l_t_3___i_t_d___h_o_t_s_p_o_t___a_n_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_nvcep_f_l_t_3___o_n_c_o_k_b___g_u_i_d_a_n_c_ePMID:9737679 ↗PMID:11090077 ↗PMID:11756186 ↗PMID:12384447 ↗

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS3 Available evidence supports FLT3 internal tandem duplications as an activating variant class in the juxtamembrane region, but no exact-variant OncoKB assertion or variant-specific functional study was identified for p.Met578_Tyr599dup. Under the local FLT3 framework, class-level ITD mechanism alone does not meet PS3 for a novel exact event. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Local FLT3 rule: do not apply PS3 when only class-level FLT3 ITD literature is available and there is no exact-variant OncoKB support or variant-specific functional evidence.
Evidence considered
  • OncoKB: variant not individually curated; biological effect unknown
  • local FLT3 ITD literature supports class-level constitutive activation only
Still missing
  • Exact-variant OncoKB gain-of-function/oncogenic curation or a variant-specific functional study would be needed.
Sources
oncokb ↗vcep_f_l_t_3___i_t_d___h_o_t_s_p_o_t___a_n_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_nvcep_f_l_t_3___o_n_c_o_k_b___g_u_i_d_a_n_c_ePMID:9737679 ↗PMID:11090077 ↗PMID:11756186 ↗PMID:12384447 ↗
PM4 This variant causes an in-frame protein length change, but in the local FLT3 framework canonical juxtamembrane ITD evidence is already captured by PM1 and the FLT3-specific PM5 rule. Available evidence does not provide a separate non-overlapping rationale to apply PM4 independently. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Do not apply PM4 separately for canonical FLT3 juxtamembrane ITD / activating length-mutation events when PM1 and/or custom PM5 already capture the hotspot mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • local FLT3 framework advises against separately stacking PM4 for canonical juxtamembrane ITDs
Sources
vcep_f_l_t_3___i_t_d___h_o_t_s_p_o_t___a_n_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_n
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0 and well below the BA1 threshold of 1%. BA1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BA1 default threshold >1%.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent
  • gnomAD v4.1: absent
Sources
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0 and below the BS1 threshold of 0.3%. BS1 is not met. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
BS1 default threshold >0.3%.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent
  • gnomAD v4.1: absent
Sources
BP3 This variant is an in-frame duplication in the established FLT3 juxtamembrane activating hotspot region, not a benign repeat-region event without known function. Under the local FLT3 framework, BP3 should not be applied to canonical juxtamembrane ITDs. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Do not apply BP3 to FLT3 in-frame ITDs or activating length mutations in the juxtamembrane hotspot region.
Evidence considered
  • local FLT3 framework states BP3 is not applicable to juxtamembrane ITD hotspot events
Sources
vcep_f_l_t_3___i_t_d___h_o_t_s_p_o_t___a_n_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_nPMID:9737679 ↗

Not assessed · 13 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No confirmed de novo data were identified, so PS2 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Parental testing or a documented de novo observation would be needed.
PS4 No case-control enrichment or case-series data demonstrating increased prevalence in affected individuals were identified, so PS4 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
  • No COSMIC result found
Still missing
  • Published germline case-level enrichment data would be needed.
Sources
PM3 No phase or recessive trans observations were identified, so PM3 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Phase information and a relevant recessive disease context would be needed.
PM6 No assumed de novo observation without confirmed maternity and paternity was identified, so PM6 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • A documented assumed de novo observation would be needed.
PP1 No segregation data were identified, so PP1 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Family segregation data would be needed.
PP4 No phenotype-specific clinical data were identified to assess whether the presentation is highly specific for a FLT3-related germline disorder, so PP4 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Phenotype and family history data would be needed.
PP5 No reputable external pathogenic classification was identified because this variant is absent from ClinVar, so PP5 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
Still missing
  • A reputable external pathogenic assertion for this exact variant would be needed.
Sources
BS2 No data were identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals in a context sufficient for BS2, so BS2 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Well-documented observation in unaffected individuals would be needed.
BS3 No well-established functional study demonstrating a benign effect for this exact variant was identified, so BS3 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No exact-variant benign functional assertion identified
Still missing
  • A validated study showing no damaging effect for this exact variant would be needed.
Sources
BS4 No nonsegregation data were identified, so BS4 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Family nonsegregation data would be needed.
BP2 No phase data with another pathogenic variant were identified, so BP2 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Phase information with another variant would be needed.
BP5 No alternate molecular explanation for the phenotype was identified, so BP5 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • Comprehensive clinical and molecular context would be needed.
BP6 No reputable external benign classification was identified because this variant is absent from ClinVar, so BP6 was not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
Still missing
  • A reputable external benign assertion for this exact variant would be needed.
Sources
Not applicable · 7· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/AThis variant is an in-frame duplication, NM_004119.2:c.1732_1797dup (p.Met578_Tyr599dup), and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice variants. Although FLT3 loss of function can be a germline disease mechanism, available evidence does not support applying PVS1 to this non-null variant type. Details ▾Hide ▴
Rule
Generic PVS1 fallback applies only to eligible null-variant classes; this variant is outside those classes.
Evidence considered
  • FLT3 loss-of-function mechanism supported at gene level
  • generic PVS1 scaffold marked apply_generic_pvs1_framework=false for this in-frame duplication
Sources
PS1 N/AThis variant is an in-frame duplication rather than a single-nucleotide missense substitution, so PS1 is not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • protein consequence p.(Met578_Tyr599dup)
Sources
prefetch
PP2 N/APP2 is a missense-specific criterion and is not applicable to this in-frame duplication. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • protein consequence p.(Met578_Tyr599dup)
Sources
prefetch
PP3 N/AMissense computational predictors are not applicable to this in-frame duplication. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, with a maximum delta score of 0.18, but this does not provide pathogenic computational support for PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.18
Sources
BP1 N/ABP1 is intended for missense variants in genes where truncating variants are the primary disease mechanism and is not applicable to this in-frame duplication. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • protein consequence p.(Met578_Tyr599dup)
Sources
prefetch
BP4 N/AMissense computational predictors are not applicable to this in-frame duplication. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, with a maximum delta score of 0.18, but that isolated finding does not support BP4 for a protein-altering tandem duplication. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.18
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is intended for synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact and is not applicable to this in-frame duplication. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • protein consequence p.(Met578_Tyr599dup)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.18
Sources
prefetchspliceai ↗

Identifiers

Gene
FLT3
Transcript
NM_004119.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_004119.2:c.1732_1797dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_004110.2:p.(Met578_Tyr599dup)
GRCh38
chr13:28034121 C>CATATTCATATTCTCTGAAATCAACGTAGAAGTACTCATTATCTGAGGAGCCGGTCACCTGTACCAT
GRCh37
chr13:28608258 C>CATATTCATATTCTCTGAAATCAACGTAGAAGTACTCATTATCTGAGGAGCCGGTCACCTGTACCAT

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in FLT3, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_004119.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.

FLT3NM_004119.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/AMissense computational predictors are not applicable to this in-frame duplication. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, with a maximum delta score of 0.18, but this does not provide pathogenic computational support for PP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.18
Sources
BP4 N/AMissense computational predictors are not applicable to this in-frame duplication. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, with a maximum delta score of 0.18, but that isolated finding does not support BP4 for a protein-altering tandem duplication. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.18
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 is intended for synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact and is not applicable to this in-frame duplication. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • protein consequence p.(Met578_Tyr599dup)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.18
Sources
prefetchspliceai ↗

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.18).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.18).

Functional

OncoKB oncogenicity for this specific variant: not classified (variant has not been individually curated).

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.