0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

BRAF c.1330C>T, p.(Arg444Trp)

NM_004333.5:c.1330C>T NP_004324.2:p.(Arg444Trp) View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About BRAF

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen BRAF VCEP v2.3.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PM1Moderate
PM1 · moderate

Variant c.1330C>T (p.Arg444Trp) is located in exon 11 (c.1315-1432), which is a VCEP-designated critical and well-established functional domain for BRAF. PM1 applied at Moderate strength per RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0 rule: 'Applicable only to critical and well-established functional domains available in the supplementary table (exon 6, exon 11, P-loop [AA 459-474], CR3 activation segment [AA 594-627]).'

PP2Supporting
PP2 · supporting

BRAF gnomAD missense Z-score is well above 3.09, meeting VCEP PP2 criteria at Supporting strength. BRAF is highly constrained against missense variation in the general population, consistent with its role as a proto-oncogene where gain-of-function missense variants cause RASopathies.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for BRAF Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework was evaluated deterministically with applied criteria: PM1 moderate, PP2 supporting; no rule matched the adjudicated criteria.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
1 / 1,613,628 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 1 / 1,613,628 alleles. Recorded AF 6.19722e-07. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.97807e-06; MAF= 0.00040%, 1/251378 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 2.89235e-05; MAF= 0.00289%, 1/34574 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.090 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.090. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
1 reported laboratory submissions

1 Uncertain significance.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. BRAF, an intracellular kinase, is frequently mutated in melanoma, thyroid and lung cancers among others.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
3 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV56083156, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen BRAF VCEP v2.3.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

26 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 8 not met · 10 not assessed · 6 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

PM1 (Moderate) is met: variant c.1330C>T (p.Arg444Trp) is located in exon 11, a VCEP-designated critical functional domain for BRAF per RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0.

PP2 (Supporting) is met: BRAF gnomAD missense Z-score exceeds 3.09, indicating strong purifying selection against missense variation, consistent with a gene where missense variants are a common mechanism of RASopathy disease.

PM2 is not met: the variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (1/251,378) and v4.1 (1/1,613,628), which precludes application under the VCEP rule requiring absence from controls.

PP3 is not met: REVEL score (0.637) falls below the VCEP PP3 threshold of ≥0.7, and SpliceAI (max delta 0.09) predicts no splicing impact.

No benign criteria are met. BA1 and BS1 are not met (allele frequency far below population thresholds). BP4 is not met (REVEL 0.637 > 0.3 threshold).

Under RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0 combination rules, PM1_Moderate + PP2_Supporting does not satisfy any Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Benign, or Likely Benign rule. The minimum for Likely Pathogenic requires either 1 Strong + 1 Moderate, or ≥3 Moderate, or 1 Moderate + ≥4 Supporting criteria. Final classification: Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

PVS1, PS5, PP4, PP5, BS3, BP6 are not applicable under the VCEP framework. PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4, PM5, PM6, PP1, BS2, BS4, BP2, BP5 are not assessed due to absence of data. PM2, PP3, BA1, BS1, BP1, BP4, BP7 were assessed and not met.

Three ClinVar-attached PMIDs (25394175, 31829902, 35924163) were reviewed in full text; none mention NM_004333.5:c.1330C>T or p.Arg444Trp. These papers are clinical practice guidelines or consensus statements on cancer genetics referral and prostate cancer biomarkers and do not provide variant-specific evidence.

Met · 2

PM1 ModerateVariant c.1330C>T (p.Arg444Trp) is located in exon 11 (c.1315-1432), which is a VCEP-designated critical and well-established functional domain for BRAF. PM1 applied at Moderate strength per RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0 rule: 'Applicable only to critical and well-established functional domains available in the supplementary table (exon 6, exon 11, P-loop [AA 459-474], CR3 activation segment [AA 594-627]).' Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • c.1330C>T falls within exon 11 (c.1315-1432 per Mutalyzer exon coordinates)
  • exon 11 is a VCEP-specified critical domain.
Sources
PP2 SupportingBRAF gnomAD missense Z-score is well above 3.09, meeting VCEP PP2 criteria at Supporting strength. BRAF is highly constrained against missense variation in the general population, consistent with its role as a proto-oncogene where gain-of-function missense variants cause RASopathies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • BRAF gnomAD v2.1 missense Z-score exceeds 3.09 threshold (BRAF is highly missense-constrained per gnomAD constraint metrics).
Sources

Not met · 8 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 No evidence that Arg444Trp has been previously established as pathogenic via a different nucleotide change at the same residue. Not observed in any curated VCEP-approved assay or published pathogenic assertion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • VCEP PS1 rule requires same amino acid change as established pathogenic variant
  • no such variant found at codon 444.
Still missing
  • No established pathogenic variant at codon 444 identified.
Sources
PM2 VCEP PM2 rule requires the variant to be absent from gnomAD. This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (1/251,378 alleles, AF=3.98e-06) and gnomAD v4.1 (1/1,613,628 alleles, AF=6.20e-07). Presence in population databases precludes PM2 application under VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: AC=1
  • AN=251
  • 378
  • AF=3.98e-06
  • gnomAD v4.1: AC=1
  • AN=1
  • 613
  • 628
  • AF=6.20e-07. VCEP PM2 requires absence.
Sources
PP3 VCEP PP3 requires REVEL score ≥ 0.7 for missense variants. REVEL score for p.Arg444Trp is 0.637, below the VCEP threshold. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta = 0.09). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • REVEL=0.637 (<0.7 threshold)
  • SpliceAI max delta=0.09
  • BayesDel=0.258.
Sources
BA1 VCEP BA1 requires gnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.05%. Highest observed subpopulation AF is 2.89e-05 (0.0029%) in Admixed American (v2.1), far below the BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 max subpop AF=2.89e-05 (Admixed American
  • 1/34
  • 574)
  • gnomAD v4.1 max subpop AF=1.67e-05 (Admixed American
  • 1/59
  • 980). Both well below 0.05% BA1 threshold.
Sources
BS1 VCEP BS1 requires gnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥ 0.025%. The variant's maximum subpopulation AF (2.89e-05) is roughly 10-fold below this threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Max subpopulation AF=2.89e-05 (v2.1 Admixed American)
  • well below 0.025% BS1 threshold.
Sources
BP1 VCEP BP1 applies only to truncating variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, initiation codon, whole/multi-exon deletion) in genes where primarily missense GOF variants cause disease. This is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • c.1330C>T is a missense variant (p.Arg444Trp)
  • BP1 applies only to truncating variants.
Sources
BP4 VCEP BP4 requires REVEL ≤ 0.3 for missense variants. REVEL score is 0.637, above this threshold. Multiple computational tools (REVEL 0.637, BayesDel 0.258) do not uniformly suggest no impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • REVEL=0.637 (>0.3 BP4 threshold)
  • BayesDel=0.258 (below typical deleterious threshold but above BP4 cutoff)
  • SpliceAI max delta=0.09 (no splicing impact).
Sources
BP7 VCEP BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants with no predicted splice impact and low nucleotide conservation. c.1330C>T is a missense variant (p.Arg444Trp), not a synonymous variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant class: missense substitution
  • BP7 applies to synonymous variants only.
Sources

Not assessed · 10 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No de novo data available for this variant. VCEP PS2 uses point-based de novo scoring requiring confirmed parentage and RASopathy phenotype. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No de novo observations in available data sources.
Still missing
  • No de novo testing data available.
Sources
PS3 Variant not tested in any VCEP-approved functional assays. No variant-specific functional data identified in the literature or functional studies spreadsheet. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx reviewed
  • R444W not present in any approved assay (BRAF Kinase Activity
  • MEK Activation
  • ERK Activation
  • RAS Activation
  • etc.).
Still missing
  • No functional data available for p.Arg444Trp in VCEP-approved assays or published literature.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
PS4 No proband case counts or case-control data available. ClinVar submission audit yielded zero usable submissions for classification. VCEP PS4 uses a point-based scoring system requiring proband observations. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar classification: Uncertain significance (1 submitter
  • no assertion criteria provided). Zero usable submissions for proband counting.
Still missing
  • No proband case counts available. Literature not informative for PS4.
Sources
PM5 VCEP PM5 requires at least one [likely] pathogenic residue change at the same codon (444). No other pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense variant at codon 444 has been identified. PM5 candidates search returned zero candidates. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • PM5 candidate collection returned zero same-residue candidates at codon 444. No ClinVar P/LP submissions at this residue.
Still missing
  • No known pathogenic missense variant at codon 444.
Sources
cspec ↗pm5_candidates
PM6 No de novo data available. VCEP PM6 uses point-based de novo scoring; no de novo observations identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No de novo reports for this variant in any data source.
Still missing
  • No de novo data available.
Sources
PP1 No cosegregation data available. VCEP PP1 requires informative meioses with RASopathy phenotype. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No family segregation data in any source.
Still missing
  • No segregation data.
Sources
BS2 VCEP BS2 uses a point-based scoring system requiring observation in a healthy adult for a fully penetrant disorder. No data available to assess this criterion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No evidence of observation in healthy adult individuals with adequate phenotypic data.
Still missing
  • No data on healthy adult carriers.
Sources
BS4 VCEP BS4 assesses lack of segregation in affected family members. No segregation data available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No segregation data available.
Still missing
  • No family segregation data.
Sources
BP2 VCEP BP2 uses point-based scoring for an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in the same gene. No data on co-occurring variants available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No evidence of alternative molecular cause in cis/trans.
Still missing
  • No co-occurring variant data.
Sources
BP5 VCEP BP5 uses point-based scoring for an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in a different gene. No data available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • No evidence of alternative molecular basis for disease.
Still missing
  • No alternative molecular diagnosis data.
Sources
Not applicable · 6· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 VCEPVCEP criterion not applicable (missense variant, not a null variant); confirmed by RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0 PVS1 applicability designation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • VCEP rule: PVS1 applicability = Not Applicable
Sources
PP4 VCEPVCEP PP4 is Not Applicable per RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0; see PS4 instead. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • VCEP rule: PP4 applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
PP5 VCEPPP5 is not for use per ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee recommendation and is designated 'Not Applicable' in RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • VCEP rule: PP5 applicability = Not Applicable for this VCEP.
Sources
BS3 VCEPVCEP BS3 is Not Applicable per RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • VCEP rule: BS3 applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
BP6 VCEPBP6 is not for use per ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee and is designated 'Not Applicable' in RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • VCEP rule: BP6 applicability = Not Applicable for this VCEP.
Sources
PS5 N/APS5 is not a criterion in the ClinGen RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0 framework. Under VCEP mode, only VCEP-defined criteria are applied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Not included in VCEP criteria list.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_004333.5
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_004333.5:c.1330C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_004324.2:p.(Arg444Trp)
GRCh38
chr7:140781678 G>A
GRCh37
chr7:140481478 G>A
ClinVar
1711755
COSMIC
COSV56083156

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in BRAF, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_004333.5. Select a row to find it on the plot.

BRAFNM_004333.5
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 1 / 1,613,628 alleles AF 6.2e-07 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 1 / 251,378 alleles AF 3.98e-06 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 6.2e-07 · 1 / 1,613,628 alleles · 0 hom
Admixed American1 / 59,980 1.7e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American, European (non-Finnish).

gnomAD v2.1

AF 4e-06 · 1 / 251,378 alleles · 0 hom
Admixed American1 / 34,574 2.9e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19722e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613628 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 1.66722e-05; MAF= 0.00167%, 1/59980 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.97807e-06; MAF= 0.00040%, 1/251378 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 2.89235e-05; MAF= 0.00289%, 1/34574 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +15 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +1 bp
0.090
SpliceAI donor lossat -102 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +93 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.040
Pangolin splice gain
0.000

Other predictors

REVEL
0.637
BayesDel
0.258

How the predictions were used

PP3 VCEP PP3 requires REVEL score ≥ 0.7 for missense variants. REVEL score for p.Arg444Trp is 0.637, below the VCEP threshold. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta = 0.09). Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • REVEL=0.637 (<0.7 threshold)
  • SpliceAI max delta=0.09
  • BayesDel=0.258.
Sources
BP4 VCEP BP4 requires REVEL ≤ 0.3 for missense variants. REVEL score is 0.637, above this threshold. Multiple computational tools (REVEL 0.637, BayesDel 0.258) do not uniformly suggest no impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • REVEL=0.637 (>0.3 BP4 threshold)
  • BayesDel=0.258 (below typical deleterious threshold but above BP4 cutoff)
  • SpliceAI max delta=0.09 (no splicing impact).
Sources
BP7 VCEP BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants with no predicted splice impact and low nucleotide conservation. c.1330C>T is a missense variant (p.Arg444Trp), not a synonymous variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant class: missense substitution
  • BP7 applies to synonymous variants only.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.09). REVEL score = 0.637. BayesDel score = 0.25761.

3 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
    Hampel H et al. · 2015
    ACMG/NSGC practice guideline on referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment. Provides referral criteria for hereditary cancer syndromes but does not discuss BRAF c.1330C>T or p.Arg444Trp.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 25394175 ↗
    Quoted passage
    in KIT, PDGFRA, or BRAF. Of patients with sporadic wild-type

    Gene-level mention of BRAF at line 842 as part of a list: 'in KIT, PDGFRA, or BRAF.'

  • Molecular Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline.
    Eggener SE et al. · 2020
    ASCO guideline on molecular biomarkers in localized prostate cancer. Discusses tissue-based biomarkers (Oncotype Dx, Prolaris, Decipher, ProMark) for risk stratification. Does not discuss BRAF, c.1330C>T, or p.Arg444Trp.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 31829902 ↗
  • Genetic Testing and Its Clinical Application in Prostate Cancer Management: Consensus Statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.
    Chiu PKF et al. · 2022
    Consensus statement from Hong Kong Urological Association and Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology on genetic testing in prostate cancer management. Mentions RAS/RAF/MEK pathway at the gene level but does not discuss BRAF c.1330C>T or p.Arg444Trp.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 35924163 ↗
    Quoted passage
    genomic profiling should be performed by NGS panel that covers the potentially actionable targets in PC such as DNA damage repair (HRR, MMR and Fanconi anemia genes, and CDK12), phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), and RAS/RAF/MEK pathways.

    Statement 2.3.1 mentions 'RAS/RAF/MEK pathways' as part of genomic profiling recommendations.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19722e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613628 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 1.66722e-05; MAF= 0.00167%, 1/59980 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.97807e-06; MAF= 0.00040%, 1/251378 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 2.89235e-05; MAF= 0.00289%, 1/34574 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

Error retrieving ClinVar entry.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.09). REVEL score = 0.637. BayesDel score = 0.25761.

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. BRAF, an intracellular kinase, is frequently mutated in melanoma, thyroid and lung cancers among others.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV56083156, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.