0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

ERBB2 c.3582del, p.(Glu1195SerfsTer3)

NM_004448.3:c.3582del NP_004439.2:p.(Glu1195SerfsTer3) View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About ERBB2

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PVS1Moderate
PVS1 · moderate

NM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift deletion in exon 27/27 (the last exon) of ERBB2, predicted to result in p.(Glu1195SerfsTer3) with loss of 58 C-terminal residues (1195-1255). The variant is located in the last exon and is not predicted to undergo nonsense-mediated decay. Under PMC6185798, for frameshift variants where NMD is not expected and the truncated region (<10% of the protein) does not remove a critical functional domain (the kinase domain, aa 720-987, remains intact), PVS1 is applied at moderate strength. Germline ERBB2 loss-of-function is supported as a disease mechanism by targeted literature review, though the supporting evidence is predominantly derived from related ERBB-family genes and somatic cancer contexts.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, consistent with a rare pathogenic variant. Under generic ACMG/AMP, absence from population databases (allele frequency <0.1%) supports PM2 at supporting strength.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PVS1 moderate, PM2 supporting; combination = 1 moderate + 1 supporting, which maps to VUS.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 18 not met · 0 not assessed · 8 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

NM_004448.3:c.3582del (p.Glu1195SerfsTer3) is a frameshift deletion in exon 27 of ERBB2, the last exon, predicted to truncate 58 C-terminal residues without triggering nonsense-mediated decay.

Under the ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798), the variant qualifies for PVS1 at moderate strength: a frameshift in the last exon where NMD is not predicted and the truncated region (<10% of the protein) does not contain a critical functional domain — the kinase domain remains intact.

The variant is absent from all population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, gnomAD-Canada), supporting PM2 at supporting strength.

No functional studies, case-control data, de novo observations, cosegregation data, or ClinVar classifications are available for this variant. Computational splicing prediction (SpliceAI max delta = 0.00) is neutral.

The combined evidence (PVS1_Moderate + PM2_Supporting) yields 1 moderate and 1 supporting criterion. Under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules, this does not meet the threshold for Likely Pathogenic (requires ≥1 moderate + ≥4 supporting, or ≥2 moderate + ≥2 supporting, among other combinations). The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Human review is recommended: ERBB2 is a proto-oncogene where C-terminal truncations have been associated with gain-of-function in somatic contexts, and the evidence for germline ERBB2 loss-of-function as a disease mechanism is limited.

Met · 2

PVS1 ModerateNM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift deletion in exon 27/27 (the last exon) of ERBB2, predicted to result in p.(Glu1195SerfsTer3) with loss of 58 C-terminal residues (1195-1255). The variant is located in the last exon and is not predicted to undergo nonsense-mediated decay. Under PMC6185798, for frameshift variants where NMD is not expected and the truncated region (<10% of the protein) does not remove a critical functional domain (the kinase domain, aa 720-987, remains intact), PVS1 is applied at moderate strength. Germline ERBB2 loss-of-function is supported as a disease mechanism by targeted literature review, though the supporting evidence is predominantly derived from related ERBB-family genes and somatic cancer contexts. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Frameshift variant in last exon (27/27)
  • NMD not predicted
  • Truncation removes 58 C-terminal residues (~4.6% of protein)
  • kinase domain intact
  • PVS1_Moderate assigned per PMC6185798 downgrade for last-exon variants without NMD
  • Gene-level LoF mechanism supported by literature (PMC6185798 gate: eligible)
Still missing
  • Supporting literature for germline ERBB2 LoF disease mechanism is predominantly from ERBB3 and somatic cancer contexts
  • dedicated germline ERBB2 LoF syndrome evidence is limited
  • C-terminal truncations in ERBB2 have been associated with gain-of-function in somatic contexts
  • the disease mechanism (LoF vs GoF) warrants expert review
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentgnomad_v2 ↗gnomad_v4 ↗
PM2 SupportingThis variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, consistent with a rare pathogenic variant. Under generic ACMG/AMP, absence from population databases (allele frequency <0.1%) supports PM2 at supporting strength. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes)
  • Absent from gnomAD v4.1 (exomes)
  • Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0
Sources

Not met · 18 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS2 No de novo occurrence data is available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No parental testing data available
PS3 No functional studies testing NM_004448.3:c.3582del or a systematically characterized range that includes this position were identified in the literature. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No functional data available for this variant or a systematically characterized range encompassing it
PS4 No case-control data or statistical evidence of enrichment in affected individuals is available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No case-control studies involving this variant
PM1 The variant does not lie within a statistically significant mutational hotspot as determined by cancerhotspots.org. The C-terminal tail of ERBB2, while containing regulatory phosphorylation sites, is not a well-established critical functional domain for PM1 purposes under generic ACMG/AMP — no domain-level pathogenic variant cluster has been demonstrated in this region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • cancerhotspots.org: residue not significant
  • No established mutational hotspot or domain-level pathogenic variant cluster at the C-terminal tail
PM6 No de novo occurrence data is available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No de novo testing data available
PP1 No cosegregation data with disease is available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No family cosegregation data available
PP3 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable to non-SNV variants. No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (no predicted splice impact)
  • REVEL/BayesDel not applicable (not an SNV)
Sources
PP4 No patient-specific phenotype or family history data is available for assessment. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No clinical phenotype data provided
PP5 This variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source has reported it as pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar: no variation IDs
  • no classifications
  • no submissions
Sources
BA1 The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada. Population allele frequency is well below the 1% threshold for BA1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Allele frequency: 0% (absent from all gnomAD datasets)
Sources
BS1 The variant is absent from gnomAD. Population allele frequency is well below the 0.3% threshold for BS1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Allele frequency: 0% (absent from all gnomAD datasets)
Sources
BS2 Not observed in a healthy adult homozygous or hemizygous state. No such observations are reported in population databases. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD homozygote count: 0
Sources
BS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating a benign effect for this variant are available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No functional data available
BS4 No cosegregation data demonstrating absence of segregation with disease is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No family cosegregation data available
BP2 No evidence of this variant occurring in trans with a known pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No phase data available
BP4 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), but NM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift variant with a clear predicted protein-truncating effect (p.Glu1195SerfsTer3). Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation — a frameshift with premature termination is inherently predicted to be damaging. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (splicing neutral
  • but not informative for a frameshift variant)
Sources
BP5 No alternative molecular cause has been identified in a case harboring this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No clinical case data available
BP6 This variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source has reported it as benign. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar: no variation IDs
  • no classifications
  • no submissions
Sources
Not applicable · 8· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/APS1 applies when the same amino acid change has been independently established as pathogenic. This variant is a frameshift deletion, not a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM4 N/APM4 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in non-repeat regions and stop-loss variants. NM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift (out-of-frame) deletion, which is evaluated under PVS1 rather than PM4. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM5 N/APM5 requires a same-residue missense comparator with established pathogenicity. This is a frameshift variant; no same-residue missense comparator candidates were identified. The automated PM5 candidate harvest returned no eligible comparators. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • pm5_mode: unknown
  • eligible_for_classic_pm5_search: false
  • No same-residue candidate variants found in ClinVar
Sources
pm5_candidates
PP2 N/APP2 applies to missense variants in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation. NM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift deletion, not a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP1 N/ABP1 applies to missense variants in genes where only truncating variants cause disease. NM_004448.3:c.3582del is itself a truncating (frameshift) variant, not a missense. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP3 N/ABP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions. NM_004448.3:c.3582del is an out-of-frame (frameshift) deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

BP7 N/ABP7 applies to synonymous variants without predicted splicing impact. NM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift deletion, not a synonymous variant. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PS5 N/APS5 is not part of the standard ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria set. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

Identifiers

Gene
ERBB2
Transcript
NM_004448.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_004448.3:c.3582del
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_004439.2:p.(Glu1195SerfsTer3)
GRCh38
chr17:39727854 AC>A
GRCh37
chr17:37884107 AC>A

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in ERBB2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_004448.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

ERBB2NM_004448.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.050
Pangolin splice gain
0.050

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable to non-SNV variants. No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (no predicted splice impact)
  • REVEL/BayesDel not applicable (not an SNV)
Sources
BP4 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), but NM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift variant with a clear predicted protein-truncating effect (p.Glu1195SerfsTer3). Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation — a frameshift with premature termination is inherently predicted to be damaging. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (splicing neutral
  • but not informative for a frameshift variant)
Sources
BP7 N/ABP7 applies to synonymous variants without predicted splicing impact. NM_004448.3:c.3582del is a frameshift deletion, not a synonymous variant. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.