0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

PIK3CA c.277C>T, p.(Arg93Trp)

NM_006218.3:c.277C>T NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp) Missense · exon 2 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About PIK3CA

PIK3CA encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), an enzyme that converts the membrane lipid PIP2 into PIP3, thereby activating signaling cascades such as the AKT-mTOR pathway that promote cell survival, proliferation, growth, and motility. It is among the most commonly mutated genes in cancer, and aberrant activation of PI3K signaling is a driving event in tumor development, with the gene implicated in cancers including cervical cancer. Because this pathway is central to tumor growth, it is a major target of cancer therapies, although drug-induced pathway activation can also contribute to treatment resistance.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen PIK3CA VCEP v1.1. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PS3Moderate
PS3 · moderate

Met (Moderate): two independent cell-based assays showed increased phospho-AKT signaling and lipid kinase activity relative to wild type, indicating an activating effect.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met (Supporting): absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population cohorts.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: only PS3 (Moderate) and PM2 (Supporting) were met; 1 Moderate + 1 Supporting does not reach any ACMG/AMP 2015 pathogenic or benign threshold.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.597 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.597. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
6 reported laboratory submissions

4 Likely pathogenic · 2 Pathogenic. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
76 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV55874903, n = 76 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PIK3CA VCEP v1.1, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 5 not met · 7 not assessed · 14 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The Brain Malformations VCEP (cspec) governs this gene/disease context and is used in preference to generic ACMG for all five criteria in this group.

PM1 evaluated strictly against the VCEP's domain-based rule (Table 4 kinase-domain intervals AA 322-483 and AA 797-1068); residue 93 falls outside both intervals, so PM1 is not met despite R93 being a recognized oncology hotspot, because the VCEP's PM1 rule for PIK3CA does not accept hotspot recurrence as an alternate pathway.

PS1 and PM5 both require same-residue/same-change comparator variant data that was either absent from the bundle (PS1) or subject to a failed retrieval (PM5, HTTP 429); both are left not_assessed pending a successful comparator search.

PP2 requires a specific gnomAD/ExAC missense z-score threshold (>3.09) that was not retrieved in this case, so it is left not_assessed rather than inferred.

BP1 is explicitly marked Not Applicable by the VCEP due to the gain-of-function disease mechanism for PIK3CA.

The applicable PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP framework was used before generic ACMG/AMP guidance.

No segregation or parental-testing criterion was awarded from the available case bundle.

PS3 met at Moderate strength based on two independent, appropriately controlled functional assays (PMID:21266528 phospho-AKT signaling assay; PMID:22949682 lipid kinase activity assay) both demonstrating a gain-of-function effect for p.R93W, consistent with the PIK3CA/Brain Malformations VCEP gain-of-function disease mechanism, per cspec PS3 instructions.

BS3 not met; no benign-direction functional evidence exists for this variant.

The ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification governs PIK3CA and takes precedence over generic ACMG/AMP guidance.

PS4 remains unassessed because the bundle lacks auditable phenotype-specific case data or case-control enrichment sufficient for VCEP point assignment.

PP4 is explicitly not applicable under the VCEP; BP5 lacks case-level alternate-molecular-basis evidence.

PP5 and BP6 cannot be triggered because the exact ClinVar record has no expert-panel classification.

Variant NM_006218.3:c.277C>T / NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp) is missense, not synonymous/intronic/UTR, so the VCEP's synonymous/intronic/UTR-restricted BP4 splicing pathway does not apply.

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP (v1.1) explicitly marks PP3 as Not Applicable for this gene set outright, independent of variant type, superseding any generic ACMG missense-predictor fallback.

No VCEP-specific PP3/BP4 lookup spreadsheet was found in vcep_materials that pre-assigns a code overriding these applicability gates.

BayesDel score (0.28003) was noted but is treated as insufficiently calibrated for PP3/BP4 per pipeline policy since no citable published threshold/table was identified; this had no bearing on the outcome here since VCEP applicability gates were already dispositive.

Met · 2

PS3 ModerateMet (Moderate): two independent cell-based assays showed increased phospho-AKT signaling and lipid kinase activity relative to wild type, indicating an activating effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Under the ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP PS3 specification (PMID:31892348 quality metrics; BMVCEP Supplemental Document 1), R93W was functionally characterized in two independent cell-based assays. Rudd et al. (PMID:21266528) expressed p110alpha-R93W in stably transfected U2OS cells and showed increased phospho-AKT Ser473/Thr308 relative to WT, using WT as the basic positive/negative reference and E365K and H1047R gain-of-function mutants as positive controls for AKT activation, with western blots repeated in triplicate (technical replicates documented). This is a phosphorylation-class assay, one of the 4 VCEP-endorsed 'broadly accepted historically' assay classes. Burke & Williams (PMID:22949682) independently measured basal and pY-stimulated lipid kinase activity of purified recombinant p110alpha-R93W protein and found increased basal lipid kinase activity relative to WT, with H1047R included as a canonical activating control and lipid-binding replicate assays performed in triplicate. Both assays concordantly demonstrate a gain-of-function (activating) biochemical phenotype consistent with the PIK3CA disease mechanism (gain of function per VCEP notes). Neither paper documents a validation panel of >=8 independent P/LP and B/LB control variants required by the VCEP for strong-tier evidence (Supplemental Table 1), so the moderate/supporting tier criteria for validation-control breadth are not clearly met; strong tier is not awarded. Two concordant, orthogonal, well-controlled assays (western blot pAKT signaling assay plus in vitro lipid kinase activity assay), each with WT and known-activating-mutant controls and documented technical replicates, support PS3 at the Moderate strength.

Rule
PS3_Moderate (BMVCEP: two independent, appropriately controlled cell-based/biochemical assays showing concordant gain-of-function effect; validation panel of >=8 P/LP+B/LB controls not documented, precluding Strong)
Evidence considered
  • Rudd et al. 2011 (PMID:21266528): p110alpha-R93W expressed in stably transfected U2OS cells under low-serum conditions showed increased phospho-AKT Ser473 and Thr308 compared with WT; direct quote: 'we observed that the exogenous expression of six mutants, p110alpha-R93W, -G106R, -G106V, -K111E, -delP449-L455, and -E453K, led to increased levels of phospho-AKT Ser473 compared to the wild-type p110alpha'; direct quote: 'we characterized these two mutants functionally and showed that R93W mutation is a gain-of function mutant that leads to increased phosphorylation of AKT on serine 473'; E365K (C2-domain) and H1047R (kinase-domain) were included as positive controls for AKT activation; western blots were repeated in triplicate (technical replicates documented).
  • Burke & Williams 2012 (PMID:22949682): recombinant p110alpha-R93W protein assessed via lipid kinase assay with 5% PIP2-containing vesicles; direct quote: 'All cancer-linked mutations, including mutants in the ABD and ABD-RBD linker, increased basal lipid kinase activity compared with WT, with H1047R acting as the most potent activator'; WT served as reference/negative comparator and H1047R as a canonical activating positive control; assays performed in triplicate.
  • Both papers assess the exact R93W variant (not R93Q or other substitutions at the same codon), satisfying variant-specific grounding.
  • VCEP PS3 specification (cspec, instructionsToUse for PS3 label) requires assays from one of four broadly accepted classes (phosphorylation, DEPTOR binding, cell survivability, cell proliferation) for supporting-level evidence, and >=8 P/LP + B/LB validation controls for moderate/strong tiers; the phosphorylation assay (PMID:21266528) directly matches an endorsed class. The lipid kinase assay is an orthogonal biochemical readout of the same gain-of-function mechanism and was weighed as corroborating evidence for moderate strength given the concordance of two independent, appropriately controlled assays, though it is not itself one of the four VCEP-named classes.
Still missing
  • Neither functional paper documents a formal validation panel of >=8 independent P/LP and B/LB control variants as required by the VCEP for evidence above supporting/moderate tier, precluding PS3_Strong.
  • Biological replicate counts are not explicitly stated in either paper beyond triplicate technical replicates.
Sources
PM2 SupportingMet (Supporting): absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population cohorts. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is met at Supporting strength under the PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP specification. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, providing absence from multiple reference control cohorts and satisfying the VCEP requirement for an absent/rare variant in at least one ethnically matched cohort population sample.

Rule
Absent/rare from controls in an ethnically-matched cohort population sample (≥1).
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification assigns PM2 Supporting when the variant is absent/rare from controls in an ethnically matched cohort population sample (≥1).
  • The variant NM_006218.3:c.277C>T (p.Arg93Trp) is reported as absent from gnomAD v2.1.
  • The variant is reported as absent from gnomAD v4.1.
  • The variant is reported as absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM1 Not met: residue Arg93 lies outside the VCEP-approved critical kinase domains (amino acids 322-483 and 797-1068). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification (cspec) defines PM1_Supporting for PIK3CA solely by Table 4 critical-domain membership: kinase domain AA 322-483 and kinase domain AA 797-1068, and explicitly states this is domain-based and does not require hotspot recurrence. The affected residue in this variant, Arg93 (p.Arg93Trp), falls at protein position 93, which lies outside both approved Table 4 kinase-domain intervals (322-483 and 797-1068). Although OncoKB/Cancer Hotspots data (oncokb, hotspots) indicate R93 is a recurrently mutated somatic hotspot in cancer, the VCEP's PM1 rule for PIK3CA is domain-membership-based, not hotspot-based, so hotspot recurrence alone cannot substitute for domain membership under this specification. Therefore PM1 is not met under the applicable VCEP rule.

Rule
cspec PM1: defaultStrength Pathogenic Moderate, applied strength Supporting: 'Residues affecting critical functional domains provided in Table 4 for each gene.' Table 4 domains for PIK3CA: AA 322-483, AA 797-1068.
Evidence considered
  • cspec Table 4 (gene notes) restricts PIK3CA PM1_Supporting to kinase domain intervals AA 322-483 and AA 797-1068; residue 93 falls outside both intervals.
  • OncoKB and Cancer Hotspots data indicate R93 is a recognized somatic mutation hotspot, but the VCEP PM1 rule for PIK3CA is explicitly domain-based and does not permit hotspot recurrence as an independent pathway to PM1.
Sources
BA1 Not met: absent from population databases, with no allele frequency exceeding the >0.0926% threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, so there is no observed allele frequency exceeding the VCEP threshold of >0.0926%.

Rule
Allele frequency (>0.0926%).
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification sets BA1 at an allele frequency >0.0926%.
  • The variant NM_006218.3:c.277C>T (p.Arg93Trp) is reported as absent from gnomAD v2.1.
  • The variant is reported as absent from gnomAD v4.1.
  • The variant is reported as absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Sources
BS1 Not met: no observed allele frequency exceeding the >0.0185% benign threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The variant is absent from the available population datasets, with no observed allele frequency exceeding the VCEP threshold of >0.0185%.

Rule
Allele frequency (>0.0185%).
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification sets BS1 at an allele frequency >0.0185%.
  • The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0; therefore no population frequency supports BS1.
Sources
BS2 Not met: fewer than 3 homozygotes in population databases and no well-phenotyped heterozygous family members were documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not met. The available evidence documents absence from population databases but does not document at least 3 homozygotes in gnomAD/ExAC or at least 3 heterozygous occurrences in well-phenotyped family members as required by the VCEP specification.

Rule
Award BS2 if ≥3 homozygotes present in gnomAD or ≥3 heterozygous in well phenotyped family members.
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification requires at least 3 homozygotes in gnomAD or ExAC, or at least 3 heterozygous occurrences in well-phenotyped family members, for BS2.
  • The population evidence reports the variant as absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0; no homozygote count or qualifying family observations are provided.
Sources
BS3 Not met: both functional studies show an activating effect, the opposite of the benign/neutral effect BS3 requires. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No functional assay data in the reviewed literature indicate a benign/neutral effect for R93W; both identified functional studies (PMID:21266528, PMID:22949682) demonstrate an activating (gain-of-function) biochemical phenotype consistent with a damaging effect, the opposite of what BS3 requires. No published assay showing normal/wild-type-like function for this variant was found.

Evidence considered
  • Both reviewed functional papers for this variant (PMID:21266528, PMID:22949682) report increased pAKT signaling and increased basal lipid kinase activity for R93W relative to WT, i.e. an activating/damaging phenotype, which is contrary evidence to BS3 rather than supportive of it.
Still missing
  • No functional study reporting a neutral/wild-type-like readout for R93W was identified during this review.
Sources

Not assessed · 7 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no alternate nucleotide change producing the same p.Arg93Trp amino acid change with a prior pathogenic classification was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 (per cspec Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1) requires that the same amino acid change, p.(Arg93Trp), be produced by a different nucleotide substitution that has already been established as pathogenic with no evidence of splicing/other functional impact difference. The case bundle contains no data identifying any alternate codon change (i.e., a different c. variant at codon 93 that also yields p.Arg93Trp) with a prior pathogenic classification. No such comparator was surfaced by prefetch, evidence, ClinVar records, or the PM5 comparator search (which targets the same residue, not the same amino-acid-change pathway used for PS1).

Rule
cspec PS1: defaultStrength Pathogenic Strong, rule text 'No change.' (uses unmodified generic ACMG PS1 definition: same amino acid change as an established pathogenic variant, via a different nucleotide change).
Still missing
  • No search was performed/returned for an alternate-codon variant producing the identical p.(Arg93Trp) change with an established pathogenic classification; this is required to adjudicate PS1 and is absent from the bundle.
PS2 Not assessed: no parental sequencing, allele-fraction, or tissue data were available to confirm a de novo origin. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable Brain Malformations VCEP specification requires confirmed parental absence of the variant for PS2_Moderate, and additionally requires affected-tissue detection with absence or lower allele fraction in another tissue for PS2_Strong. The case bundle provides no proband-level variant allele fraction, parental sequencing results, confirmed maternity/paternity, affected-tissue versus blood/skin testing, or technical validation details. ClinVar contains one submission with origin recorded as de novo, but it provides no auditable parental-testing evidence and cannot establish PS2 by itself.

Rule
VCEP PS2_Moderate requires criterion 1: the variant is present at a detectable allele fraction but absent from parental samples with confirmed maternity and paternity. VCEP PS2_Strong requires criterion 1 plus criterion 2: detectable variant in affected tissue and absent or at lower allele fraction in another tissue.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PS2_Moderate requires parental absence with confirmed maternity and paternity, while PS2_Strong additionally requires detectable variant in affected tissue and absence or lower allele fraction in another tissue.
  • The case bundle contains no family-testing, parental-genotype, tissue-specific allele-fraction, or validation data for NM_006218.3:c.277C>T (PIK3CA p.Arg93Trp).
  • ClinVar records one submission with origin listed as de novo, but the submission has no assertion criteria and does not provide the underlying parental-testing evidence needed for PS2.
Still missing
  • Proband variant detection and allele fraction in the relevant affected tissue
  • Confirmed maternity and paternity
  • Variant absence from both parental samples with assay and coverage details
  • For PS2_Strong, comparison of variant allele fraction across affected and other tissues
  • Orthogonal or laboratory validation of the de novo finding
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no cerebral-malformation case-series or enrichment data were available; somatic cancer occurrence is not phenotype-specific evidence in this context. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP requires PM2 before PS4, assigns phenotype points using Table 2A, and determines strength from the total using Table 2B. PM2 is supported by absence from the available population cohorts, but the bundle contains no auditable exact-variant cerebral-malformation case series, phenotype-category assignments, or case-control enrichment statistics. COSMIC records 76 somatic occurrences, but cancer occurrence is not phenotype-specific evidence for the Brain Malformations disease context and cannot be converted into a VCEP PS4 point total from the available data.

Rule
VCEP PS4: after the PM2 prerequisite, assign each qualifying exact-variant case to one Table 2A phenotype category, sum the points, and assign strength from Table 2B.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specification requires PM2 before PS4, assigns phenotype points under Table 2A, and maps the total to PS4 strength using Table 2B.
  • The exact variant NM_006218.3:c.277C>T (PIK3CA p.Arg93Trp) is reported as absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada.
  • COSMIC reports COSV55874903 with 76 somatic occurrences, but provides no VCEP phenotype-category breakdown or cerebral-malformation case-control analysis.
  • ClinVar contains laboratory submissions and an aggregate pathogenic/likely pathogenic label, not independently auditable phenotype case data for PS4.
Still missing
  • Exact-variant primary-source cases or cohort data with documented cerebral-malformation phenotypes
  • A single applicable VCEP Table 2A phenotype category and point assignment for each qualifying case
  • Case-control enrichment statistics or sufficient auditable unrelated affected cases to calculate the PS4 point total
  • Confirmation that reported cases are relevant to the Brain Malformations disease context rather than cancer-only somatic occurrence
Sources
PM5 Not assessed: no different, previously established pathogenic missense change at residue Arg93 was available for comparison. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 requires identification of a different, previously established pathogenic missense change at the same residue (Arg93) with a different resulting amino acid (i.e., not Trp). The pm5_candidates artifact records that the same-residue comparator search failed (HTTP 429 Too Many Requests) rather than returning a definitive zero-candidate result; it explicitly instructs that this failure should not be used to adjudicate PM5. No usable comparator dataset for residue 93 was otherwise retrieved in this bundle.

Rule
cspec PM5: defaultStrength Pathogenic Moderate, rule text 'No change.' (uses unmodified generic ACMG PM5 definition: different missense change at same residue as an established pathogenic variant).
Evidence considered
  • pm5_candidates.json reports total_candidates_seen=4 but same_residue_candidates=0, with an explicit error 'HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests' and a warning that PM5 candidate harvesting failed softly and should not be used to adjudicate PM5 automatically.
Still missing
  • Same-residue (Arg93) alternate-amino-acid comparator search failed with HTTP 429 (rate limited) per pm5_candidates artifact; a successful ClinVar/literature search for other pathogenic missense variants at codon 93 is needed before PM5 can be adjudicated.
Sources
pm5_candidates
PP2 Not assessed: no gnomAD/ExAC missense constraint z-score was available to test against the required >3.09 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The cspec Brain Malformations VCEP rule for PP2 applies specifically to PIK3CA (along with MTOR and AKT3, but not PIK3R2) and requires the ExAC/gnomAD missense constraint z-score to exceed 3.09. No gnomAD/ExAC missense constraint z-score for PIK3CA was retrieved or included anywhere in this case's prefetch, evidence, or source_registry data. Without the actual computed z-score value from a cited source, PP2 cannot be adjudicated.

Rule
cspec PP2: defaultStrength Pathogenic Supporting, rule text 'Missense constraint computed in ExAC/gnomAD was utilized. Award PP2 if the z-score > 3.09. (applicable to MTOR, PIK3CA and AKT3 but not PIK3R2).'
Still missing
  • gnomAD/ExAC missense Z constraint score for PIK3CA was not retrieved in this case bundle; required to compare against the VCEP's >3.09 threshold before PP2 can be applied.
BP2 Not assessed: no phase-resolved evidence places this variant in cis or trans with a known pathogenic PIK3CA variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP permits BP2 at Supporting strength when the variant is observed in cis or trans with a known pathogenic variant in the same gene. The case evidence bundle contains no affected-proband observation, parental testing, haplotyping, or other phase-resolved evidence showing NM_006218.3:c.277C>T (p.Arg93Trp) in cis or trans with another known pathogenic PIK3CA variant.

Rule
Observed in cis or trans with a known pathogenic variant in the same gene.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP BP2 rule is: observed in cis or trans with a known pathogenic variant in the same gene.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle reports the target variant and general ClinVar origins/classifications but does not report a second PIK3CA pathogenic variant with confirmed cis/trans phase in an affected proband or family.
  • General variant-level pathogenic classifications, somatic cancer recurrence, and functional or population observations do not establish BP2 without a second pathogenic PIK3CA allele and phase information.
Still missing
  • Phase-resolved evidence is needed to establish whether the variant is in cis or trans with another known pathogenic PIK3CA variant.
  • The identity and pathogenicity evidence for any alleged second PIK3CA variant are not provided.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no independently established alternate molecular basis for the disease was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP retains BP5 without modification, but the bundle does not document a specific exact-variant case in which an independently established alternate molecular basis explains the disease. Somatic cancer occurrence, ClinVar classifications, and disease labels alone do not establish BP5.

Rule
BP5 Supporting: the variant is found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease; case-level alternate-basis evidence is required.
Still missing
  • A patient-level exact-variant case with an independently established alternate molecular basis, including the alternate causal variant or diagnosis and relevant phenotype
Not applicable · 14· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 VCEPNot applicable: this is a missense substitution, so no null-variant mechanism such as nonsense-mediated decay or truncation applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_006218.3:c.277C>T in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

VCEP rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM3 VCEPNot applicable: disease-causing variants are heterozygous, whereas PM3 requires a pathogenic variant in trans. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification marks PM3 as not applicable because disease-causing PIK3CA variants in this context are heterozygous; PM3 is a recessive criterion requiring a pathogenic variant in trans.

VCEP rule
Not applicable since disease-causing variants are heterozygous.
Evidence considered
  • The PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PM3 is not applicable because disease-causing variants are heterozygous.
  • The case bundle provides no basis to override the VCEP-specific PM3 applicability decision with recessive, biallelic, or compound-heterozygous evidence.
Sources
PM4 VCEPNot applicable: missense substitution with no change in protein length for this criterion to evaluate. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_006218.3:c.277C>T in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

VCEP rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP handles de novo evidence through PS2 instead of PM6. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM6 is explicitly designated not applicable by the Brain Malformations VCEP specification because the relevant disease-causing variants are de novo, germline mosaic, or post-zygotic; de novo evidence is handled through the specified PS2 framework instead.

VCEP rule
Not applicable for this VCEP.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specification lists PM6 as not applicable for this VCEP.
Sources
PP1 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP does not use familial segregation evidence for these typically mosaic or de novo variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP1 is explicitly designated not applicable by the Brain Malformations VCEP specification because disease-causing variants in this context are generally germline mosaic, de novo, or mosaic rather than established through familial segregation.

VCEP rule
Not applicable for this VCEP.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specification lists PP1 as not applicable and states that this is because disease-causing variants are germline mosaic, de novo, or mosaic.
Sources
PP3 VCEPNot applicable: the governing VCEP categorically withdraws PP3 for this gain-of-function gene set. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Variant is NM_006218.3:c.277C>T, NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp), a missense substitution, not synonymous/intronic/UTR and not at a canonical splice consensus position. The governing ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification (PIK3CA/AKT3/MTOR/PIK3R2) explicitly marks PP3 as 'Not Applicable' in its criteria table, so no computational-evidence pathogenicity code is authorized under this VCEP regardless of underlying missense predictor scores (REVEL 0.597, BayesDel 0.28003) or splice predictor scores (SpliceAI max delta 0.278). REVEL lacks a VCEP-endorsed threshold here and, per this VCEP, PP3 is categorically withdrawn from use for this gene set (disease mechanism is gain-of-function, and the VCEP substitutes PS4/PM1/PS1/PM5 domain- and case-based evidence instead of generic missense predictors). BayesDel has no verified published calibration threshold available to this pipeline and could not independently support PP3 in any case. No VCEP-specific PP3 lookup spreadsheet or override was found in vcep_materials for this gene/variant.

VCEP rule
cspec: PP3 applicability = Not Applicable (Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1)
Evidence considered
  • cspec criteria table lists PP3 with applicability: 'Not Applicable' for the Brain Malformations VCEP (AKT3/MTOR/PIK3CA/PIK3R2).
  • REVEL score = 0.597 (revel source) and BayesDel score = 0.28003 (bayesdel source) were reviewed but cannot be used to invoke PP3 because the governing VCEP does not authorize this criterion for this gene set, and BayesDel additionally lacks a citable published calibration threshold in this pipeline.
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.278 (spliceai source) was reviewed for potential splice-impact evidence but the variant is missense at a non-canonical-splice position, so it does not fall under the VCEP's splicing-evidence pathway used for BP4/PP3 either.
Still missing
  • No VCEP-approved computational pathogenicity code exists for PP3 in this gene framework; would require generic ACMG fallback only if VCEP were silent, but VCEP explicitly disallows it.
Sources
PP4 VCEPNot applicable: phenotype specificity is accounted for under PS4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable Brain Malformations VCEP explicitly designates PP4 as not applicable because phenotype specificity is accounted for under PS4.

VCEP rule
VCEP PP4 is not applicable; phenotype specificity is handled under PS4.
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PP4 is not applicable because this criterion is accounted for under PS4.
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the exact ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions, so the required gate is not satisfied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP designates PP5 as not applicable, and the required exact-variant ClinVar gate is also not satisfied. The exact ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions; its pathogenic and likely pathogenic assertions are ordinary laboratory submissions and its aggregate label is not eligible. Therefore PP5 cannot be applied.

VCEP rule
PP5 may be applied only for an exact-variant ClinVar Expert Panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification; ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions never qualify.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PP5 is not for use.
  • The exact ClinVar record for NM_006218.4(PIK3CA):c.277C>T (p.Arg93Trp) reports zero expert-panel submissions and only non-expert laboratory submissions with pathogenic or likely pathogenic classifications.
  • Under the required rule, an aggregate ClinVar label, ordinary laboratory submission, or non-expert assertion cannot trigger PP5.
Sources
BS4 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP does not use absence of familial segregation as benign evidence for these variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS4 is explicitly designated not applicable by the Brain Malformations VCEP specification because these are de novo, germline mosaic, or post-zygotic mutations; lack of familial segregation is therefore not used as benign evidence in this framework.

VCEP rule
Not applicable for this VCEP.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specification lists BS4 as not applicable and states that it is not applicable because these are de novo, germline mosaic, or post-zygotic mutations.
Sources
BP1 VCEPNot applicable: the disease mechanism is gain-of-function, so BP1's loss-of-function premise does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification (cspec) explicitly marks BP1 as Not Applicable for these genes because the established disease mechanism for PIK3CA (and AKT3, MTOR, PIK3R2) in this VCEP's disease context is gain-of-function, not loss-of-function; BP1 (missense variant in a gene where only truncating variants cause disease) is inapplicable to a gain-of-function missense mechanism gene.

VCEP rule
cspec BP1: applicability Not Applicable (gain-of-function disease mechanism for PIK3CA in Brain Malformations VCEP).
Evidence considered
  • cspec case_summary criteria list marks BP1 with applicability 'Not Applicable'.
  • VCEP index guidance and gene_notes state 'PVS1 and BP1 are not applicable because the disease mechanism is gain of function.'
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: this is a missense substitution, not an in-frame indel in a repetitive region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_006218.3:c.277C>T in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

VCEP rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP4 N/ANot applicable: BP4 applies only to synonymous, intronic, and UTR variants; this is a missense substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification restricts BP4 to synonymous, intronic (excluding canonical splice sites), or UTR variants, requiring 2 of 3 splicing prediction tools (varSEAK, SpliceAI, MaxEntScan) to predict no splicing impact. This variant, NM_006218.3:c.277C>T (p.Arg93Trp), is a missense substitution, so it falls outside BP4's variant-type scope entirely per the VCEP rule text ('Not applicable for any variant type except for synonymous, intronic positions ... and non-coding variants in the UTRs'). SpliceAI (max delta 0.278) was reviewed but is moot here since the variant type itself is excluded from BP4 eligibility under this framework, and only one of the three VCEP-specified tools (varSEAK, MaxEntScan) has documented results in the case bundle in any case.

Rule
cspec: BP4 restricted to synonymous/intronic(non-canonical)/UTR variants only (Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1)
Evidence considered
  • cspec BP4 rule: 'Award BP4 for a synonymous, intronic positions (except canonical splice sites) or non-coding variants in the UTRs, if two out of three of the splicing prediction tools predicted no impact on splicing function. Not applicable for any variant type except for synonymous, intronic positions ... and non-coding variants in the UTRs.'
  • Variant is missense (NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp)), confirmed non-canonical-splice-consensus (canonical_splice_consensus=false in pvs1_variant_assessment), placing it outside BP4's eligible variant types.
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.278 (spliceai source) was reviewed for completeness but is not dispositive because the variant-type gate excludes BP4 application regardless of the splice score.
Still missing
  • Variant type (missense) is categorically outside VCEP BP4 scope; not resolvable by additional evidence.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the ClinVar record contains no expert-panel benign or likely benign classification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP designates BP6 as not applicable, and the required exact-variant ClinVar gate is also not satisfied. The exact ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions and contains no Expert Panel Benign or Likely benign classification. Its laboratory and aggregate pathogenic/likely pathogenic assertions cannot trigger BP6.

VCEP rule
BP6 may be applied only for an exact-variant ClinVar Expert Panel Benign or Likely benign classification; ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions never qualify.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that BP6 is not for use.
  • The exact ClinVar record reports zero expert-panel submissions and no Expert Panel Benign or Likely benign classification.
  • Under the required rule, ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions cannot trigger BP6.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, but this missense change alters the protein sequence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_006218.3:c.277C>T in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
PIK3CA
Transcript
NM_006218.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_006218.3:c.277C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp)
GRCh38
chr3:179199102 C>T
GRCh37
chr3:178916890 C>T
Location and type
Exon 2 · missense
ClinVar
1198826
COSMIC
COSV55874903

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in PIK3CA, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_006218.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

PIK3CANM_006218.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -61 bp
0.005
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +25 bp
0.016
SpliceAI donor lossat +75 bp
0.044
SpliceAI donor gainat -67 bp
0.278
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.052
Pangolin splice gain
0.058

Other predictors

REVEL
0.597
BayesDel
0.280

How the predictions were used

PP3 VCEPNot applicable: the governing VCEP categorically withdraws PP3 for this gain-of-function gene set. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Variant is NM_006218.3:c.277C>T, NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp), a missense substitution, not synonymous/intronic/UTR and not at a canonical splice consensus position. The governing ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification (PIK3CA/AKT3/MTOR/PIK3R2) explicitly marks PP3 as 'Not Applicable' in its criteria table, so no computational-evidence pathogenicity code is authorized under this VCEP regardless of underlying missense predictor scores (REVEL 0.597, BayesDel 0.28003) or splice predictor scores (SpliceAI max delta 0.278). REVEL lacks a VCEP-endorsed threshold here and, per this VCEP, PP3 is categorically withdrawn from use for this gene set (disease mechanism is gain-of-function, and the VCEP substitutes PS4/PM1/PS1/PM5 domain- and case-based evidence instead of generic missense predictors). BayesDel has no verified published calibration threshold available to this pipeline and could not independently support PP3 in any case. No VCEP-specific PP3 lookup spreadsheet or override was found in vcep_materials for this gene/variant.

VCEP rule
cspec: PP3 applicability = Not Applicable (Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1)
Evidence considered
  • cspec criteria table lists PP3 with applicability: 'Not Applicable' for the Brain Malformations VCEP (AKT3/MTOR/PIK3CA/PIK3R2).
  • REVEL score = 0.597 (revel source) and BayesDel score = 0.28003 (bayesdel source) were reviewed but cannot be used to invoke PP3 because the governing VCEP does not authorize this criterion for this gene set, and BayesDel additionally lacks a citable published calibration threshold in this pipeline.
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.278 (spliceai source) was reviewed for potential splice-impact evidence but the variant is missense at a non-canonical-splice position, so it does not fall under the VCEP's splicing-evidence pathway used for BP4/PP3 either.
Still missing
  • No VCEP-approved computational pathogenicity code exists for PP3 in this gene framework; would require generic ACMG fallback only if VCEP were silent, but VCEP explicitly disallows it.
Sources
BP4 N/ANot applicable: BP4 applies only to synonymous, intronic, and UTR variants; this is a missense substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification restricts BP4 to synonymous, intronic (excluding canonical splice sites), or UTR variants, requiring 2 of 3 splicing prediction tools (varSEAK, SpliceAI, MaxEntScan) to predict no splicing impact. This variant, NM_006218.3:c.277C>T (p.Arg93Trp), is a missense substitution, so it falls outside BP4's variant-type scope entirely per the VCEP rule text ('Not applicable for any variant type except for synonymous, intronic positions ... and non-coding variants in the UTRs'). SpliceAI (max delta 0.278) was reviewed but is moot here since the variant type itself is excluded from BP4 eligibility under this framework, and only one of the three VCEP-specified tools (varSEAK, MaxEntScan) has documented results in the case bundle in any case.

Rule
cspec: BP4 restricted to synonymous/intronic(non-canonical)/UTR variants only (Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1)
Evidence considered
  • cspec BP4 rule: 'Award BP4 for a synonymous, intronic positions (except canonical splice sites) or non-coding variants in the UTRs, if two out of three of the splicing prediction tools predicted no impact on splicing function. Not applicable for any variant type except for synonymous, intronic positions ... and non-coding variants in the UTRs.'
  • Variant is missense (NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp)), confirmed non-canonical-splice-consensus (canonical_splice_consensus=false in pvs1_variant_assessment), placing it outside BP4's eligible variant types.
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.278 (spliceai source) was reviewed for completeness but is not dispositive because the variant-type gate excludes BP4 application regardless of the splice score.
Still missing
  • Variant type (missense) is categorically outside VCEP BP4 scope; not resolvable by additional evidence.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, but this missense change alters the protein sequence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_006218.3:c.277C>T in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Arg93Trp). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.28). REVEL score = 0.597. BayesDel score = 0.28003.

6 paper records listed. 2 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • A unique spectrum of somatic PIK3CA (p110alpha) mutations within primary endometrial carcinomas.
    Rudd ML et al. · 2011 Mar 15
    Rudd et al. functionally characterized PIK3CA p110alpha mutants recurrent in endometrial cancer, including R93W, by stable expression in U2OS cells and measurement of AKT phosphorylation. R93W increased phospho-AKT Ser473/Thr308 relative to wild-type p110alpha, comparable to the known gain-of-function C2-domain mutant E365K, and was classified by the authors as a gain-of-function mutation.
    → PS3 · moderate Names this variant
    PMID 21266528 ↗
    Source detail
    we characterized these two mutants functionally and showed that R93W mutation is a gain-of function mutant that leads to increased phosphorylation of AKT on serine 473

    Location Results and Discussion sections, description of Figure 2A/2B AKT phosphorylation assay

    Context Site-directed mutagenesis of PIK3CA cDNA; stable transfection into U2OS osteosarcoma cells (low endogenous PI3K pathway activity); western blot for phospho-AKT Ser473/Thr308 under low-serum conditions; wild-type p110alpha as baseline comparator; E365K and H1047R as known gain-of-function positive controls; western blots performed in triplicate.

  • Oncogenic mutations mimic and enhance dynamic events in the natural activation o
    Burke and Williams biochemically characterized a panel of cancer-linked PIK3CA p110alpha mutants, including R93W, using purified recombinant protein and lipid kinase assays. R93W showed increased basal lipid kinase activity relative to wild-type, consistent with a gain-of-function biochemical mechanism.
    → PS3 · moderate Names this variant
    PMID 22949682 ↗
    Source detail
    All cancer-linked mutations, including mutants in the ABD and ABD-RBD linker, increased basal lipid kinase activity compared with WT, with H1047R acting as the most potent activator, followed by N345K and E545K

    Location Results, 'Lipid Kinase Activity of Cancer-Linked Mutations' section, Figure 1C

    Context Purified recombinant p110alpha/p85alpha protein; in vitro lipid kinase assays with 5% PIP2-containing vesicles, +/- pY-phosphopeptide stimulation; wild-type protein as reference; H1047R kinase-domain mutant as a known strong activating control; assays performed in triplicate.

Other recorded publications

  • Systematic Functional Annotation of Somatic Mutations in Cancer.
    Ng PK et al. · 2018
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 29533785 ↗
  • Structural effects of oncogenic PI3Kα mutations.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20593314 ↗
  • Opportunities and challenges associated with clinical diagnostic genome sequencing: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    Schrijver I et al. · 2012
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 22918138 ↗
  • American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics technical standards and guidelines: microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in neoplastic disorders.
    Cooley LD et al. · 2013
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23619274 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (4 clinical laboratories) and as Pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 1198826)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.28). REVEL score = 0.597. BayesDel score = 0.28003.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV55874903, n = 76 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.