0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

PIK3CA c.268T>C, p.(Cys90Arg)

NM_006218.4:c.268T>C NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg) Missense · exon 2 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About PIK3CA

PIK3CA encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), an enzyme that converts the membrane lipid PIP2 into PIP3, thereby activating signaling cascades such as the AKT-mTOR pathway that promote cell survival, proliferation, growth, and motility. It is among the most commonly mutated genes in cancer, and aberrant activation of PI3K signaling is a driving event in tumor development, with the gene implicated in cancers including cervical cancer. Because this pathway is central to tumor growth, it is a major target of cancer therapies, although drug-induced pathway activation can also contribute to treatment resistance.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen PIK3CA VCEP v1.1. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PM1Supporting
PM1 · supporting

Met (Supporting): residue 90 falls within the PI3K adaptor-binding domain (amino acids 31-108), a critical functional domain in the approved table.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met (Supporting): the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population databases.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

PM1 and PM2 were each met at supporting strength, but two supporting criteria do not reach the ACMG/AMP 2015 threshold for pathogenic or likely pathogenic.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.862 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.862. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
1 reported laboratory submissions

1 Uncertain significance. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, single submitter.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
1 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV55976286, n = 1 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PIK3CA VCEP v1.1, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 3 not met · 9 not assessed · 14 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

For this PIK3CA Brain Malformations case, PS2 is applicable in principle but cannot be assessed because the bundle contains no proband, parental, maternity/paternity, or tissue-distribution evidence.

PM6, PP1, and BS4 are not applicable under the governing VCEP specification and were not adjudicated using generic ACMG rules.

No PP3 or BP4 computational evidence code is applicable under the governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification for this PIK3CA missense variant.

Population evidence supports PM2_Supporting only; no benign population criterion is met.

The variant is absent from all three supplied population resources, with no observed allele frequency, homozygote count, or ancestry-specific frequency exceeding a benign threshold.

Met · 2

PM1 SupportingMet (Supporting): residue 90 falls within the PI3K adaptor-binding domain (amino acids 31-108), a critical functional domain in the approved table. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specifies PM1 at Supporting strength for residues affecting critical functional domains in Table 4. The authoritative vcep_materials.json domain_tables entry for PIK3CA lists the adaptor binding domain (PI3K ABD) at amino acids 31-108, the kinase Ras-binding domain at 173-292, and kinase domains at 322-483 and 797-1068. The variant is p.Cys90Arg, so residue 90 falls within the approved PI3K ABD interval 31-108; the other approved intervals were also checked and do not contain residue 90. PM1_Supporting is therefore met.

Rule
Residues affecting critical functional domains provided in Table 4 for each gene.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP PM1 rule awards Supporting evidence for residues affecting critical functional domains provided in Table 4.
  • The authoritative PIK3CA domain table lists PI3K ABD residues 31-108, kinase Ras-binding residues 173-292, and kinase-domain intervals 322-483 and 797-1068.
  • The case protein consequence is p.Cys90Arg; residue 90 is within the approved PI3K ABD interval 31-108 and outside the other listed intervals.
Sources
PM2 SupportingMet (Supporting): the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population databases. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2_Supporting is met under the governing ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification. NM_006218.4:c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg) is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0. The case does not document the patient's ancestry, so the ethnically matched-cohort component cannot be independently confirmed; this is retained as a human-review caveat rather than downgrading the VCEP population absence evidence.

Rule
Absent/rare from controls in an ethnically-matched cohort population sample (>=1).
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specifies PM2 at Supporting strength for a variant absent/rare from controls in an ethnically matched cohort population sample, with one population sample sufficient.
  • The variant is reported absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0. These independent population resources provide concordant absence evidence, although the case does not state the patient's ancestry or provide detailed coverage metrics.
Still missing
  • Patient ancestry is not documented, so an ethnically matched population cohort cannot be specifically verified.
  • The population records provide absence statements but no explicit allele-number, allele-count, or coverage metrics.
Sources

Not met · 3 · evaluated, threshold not reached

BA1 Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, far below the >0.0926% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP threshold for PIK3CA is allele frequency >0.0926%. NM_006218.4:c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg) is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0; therefore no population frequency approaches the BA1 threshold.

Rule
Allele frequency (>0.0926%).
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification sets BA1 at allele frequency >0.0926% for this disease context.
  • The variant is reported absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, with no allele count or allele frequency reported in any of these sources.
Sources
BS1 Not met: the variant is absent from population databases, below the >0.0185% BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP threshold for PIK3CA is allele frequency >0.0185%. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, so no observed frequency exceeds the BS1 threshold.

Rule
Allele frequency (>0.0185%).
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification sets BS1 at allele frequency >0.0185% for this disease context.
  • The variant is reported absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0; no population allele frequency exceeds the VCEP BS1 threshold.
Sources
BS2 Not met: no gnomAD homozygotes and no heterozygous observations in well-phenotyped family members were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not met. The PIK3CA VCEP requires at least 3 homozygotes in gnomAD or at least 3 heterozygous observations in well-phenotyped family members. The available population sources report the variant as absent, and the case contains no qualifying homozygote observations or well-phenotyped family-member observations.

Rule
Award BS2 if >=3 homozygotes present in gnomAD or >=3 heterozygous in well phenotyped family members.
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP BS2 rule requires >=3 homozygotes in gnomAD or >=3 heterozygous observations in well-phenotyped family members.
  • gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 each report the variant as absent; no homozygote count is available and no qualifying family observations are provided.
Sources

Not assessed · 9 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no pathogenic variant causing the same amino-acid change (p.Cys90Arg) has been previously established; the only ClinVar record is of Uncertain significance. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP applies PS1 at Strong strength without modification when the same amino-acid change has been previously established as pathogenic. The case variant is PIK3CA p.Cys90Arg, but the available bundle does not provide a previously established pathogenic variant with the same amino-acid change. The single ClinVar submission is uncertain significance and cannot establish PS1.

Rule
No change.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP specifies PS1 as applicable as originally described at Strong strength: same amino-acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
  • The case variant is NM_006218.4:c.268T>C, NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg).
  • ClinVar reports one single-submitter classification of uncertain significance, which is not evidence that the same amino-acid change is established pathogenic.
Still missing
  • No independently evaluated pathogenic PIK3CA p.Cys90Arg comparator was identified in the supplied evidence bundle.
Sources
PS2 Not assessed: no de novo documentation was available - no parental testing, maternity/paternity confirmation, or tissue comparison - so PS2 could not be awarded. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP rule requires de novo evidence. Strong PS2 requires the variant to be detectable in affected tissue, absent from parental samples with confirmed maternity and paternity, and absent or at a lower allelic fraction in another tissue; Moderate PS2 requires confirmed parental absence or, if parents are unavailable, the affected-tissue distribution criterion. The case-evidence bundle contains no proband variant allele fraction, parental testing results, maternity/paternity confirmation, tissue comparison, or other de novo documentation, so PS2 cannot be awarded or excluded.

Rule
VCEP PS2: Strong requires Criteria 1 AND Criteria 2; Criteria 1 is detectable variant in the proband affected tissue absent from parents with confirmed maternity and paternity, and Criteria 2 is detectable variant in affected tissue absent from or at a lower allelic fraction in another tissue. Moderate requires Criteria 1 OR, if parents are unavailable, Criteria 2.
Evidence considered
  • The ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification for PIK3CA defines PS2_Strong using both parental absence with confirmed maternity/paternity and tissue-distribution criteria, and PS2_Moderate using confirmed parental absence or the tissue criterion when parents are unavailable.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no proband, parental, maternity/paternity, allele-fraction, or tissue-segregation data for NM_006218.4:c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg).
Still missing
  • Proband variant detection and allele fraction are not documented.
  • Maternal and paternal testing results and confirmation of maternity/paternity are not documented.
  • Affected-tissue and other-tissue variant fractions are not documented.
Sources
PS3 Not assessed: no validated functional assay tested this exact variant; studies of the similar C90Y substitution cannot establish an effect for C90R. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification requires a validated functional assay with the specified quality metrics and controls. The case bundle provides no assay result for the exact variant NM_006218.4:c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg). PMID:29975751 tested other PIK3CA ABD variants, including C90Y, but did not test C90R; results from a different amino-acid substitution cannot establish PS3 for this variant. Therefore PS3 cannot be assigned at any strength.

Rule
Applicable VCEP PS3 rule: follow ClinGen SVI recommendations and BMVCEP specifications for functional-assay quality metrics and minimum validation controls; the assay must meet the acceptability criteria cited by the VCEP (PMID:31892348).
Evidence considered
  • The applicable Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PS3 follows ClinGen SVI recommendations with BMVCEP quality metrics and minimum validation controls; evidence above Supporting requires independent positive and negative controls and variant-count thresholds.
  • The bundle's extracted finding for PMID:29975751 reports experiments on PIK3CA C90Y and R88Q, not the case variant p.Cys90Arg, so those results were not used to assign PS3.
  • The case variant is NM_006218.4:c.268T>C, NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg).
Still missing
  • No variant-specific in vitro or in vivo functional assay result for PIK3CA p.Cys90Arg.
  • No documented assay validation controls, replicate data, or quantitative result for the exact variant.
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no affected cerebral-malformation cases with phenotype-point assignments or case-control enrichment data were available; one somatic cancer occurrence is insufficient. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP PS4 specification requires PM2 eligibility and phenotype-point accumulation under Tables 2A/2B. Although the variant is absent from the available population datasets, the bundle supplies no affected cerebral-malformation cases with usable phenotype-point assignments or case-control enrichment data. One somatic cancer occurrence is insufficient to reach the VCEP PS4_Supporting threshold.

Rule
PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP PS4: phenotype points under Tables 2A/2B may be used only with PM2; PS4_Supporting requires 0.5–1.25 points.
Evidence considered
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification requires PM2 eligibility and assigns PS4 only after summing phenotype points: Supporting 0.5–1.25, Moderate 1.5–3.25, Strong 3.5–15.75, and Very Strong at least 16 points.
  • The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, satisfying the population-data prerequisite but not supplying affected-case evidence.
  • The evidence bundle records one COSMIC somatic cancer occurrence; the VCEP material states tumor evidence contributes only 0.25 point per occurrence category, below the PS4_Supporting threshold.
Still missing
  • Variant-specific, phenotyped cerebral-malformation cases sufficient to calculate the VCEP Table 2A total are unavailable.
  • No case-control study or odds-ratio analysis for c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg) is available.
Sources
PM5 Not assessed: the same-residue comparator C90Y was not established as pathogenic; its study reported no increased activity or tumorigenic phenotype. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP applies PM5 at Moderate strength as originally described: a novel missense change at a residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before. The bundle identifies one same-residue comparator, PIK3CA C90Y, in a functional paper, but that study does not establish C90Y as pathogenic and instead reports no increased activity or tumorigenic phenotype over wild type in its tested models. The supplied PM5 candidate summary also reports no useful same-residue candidates. PM5 cannot be met from the available evidence.

Rule
No change.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP PM5 rule requires a different missense change at the same amino-acid residue that has been determined to be pathogenic; the default strength is Moderate.
  • The supplied PM5 candidate summary reports one candidate seen overall but zero same-residue candidates and no useful candidates for PM5.
  • PMID:29975751 experimentally evaluated PIK3CA C90Y as a same-residue comparator but reported that ABD mutants did not increase PI3K signaling, migration, or colony formation more than wild-type PIK3CA in the tested models and did not establish C90Y as pathogenic.
Still missing
  • A different PIK3CA missense variant at residue 90 established as pathogenic by eligible clinical evidence is not available in the supplied bundle.
Sources
PP2 Not assessed: the required missense-constraint z-score (threshold >3.09) was not available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP allows PP2 at Supporting strength for PIK3CA when the ExAC/gnomAD missense-constraint z-score is greater than 3.09. The supplied bundle confirms that PP2 is applicable to PIK3CA and provides no missense-constraint z-score for the gene. The available population records are variant-frequency absence results and do not establish the required gene-level constraint threshold, so PP2 is not assessed.

Rule
Missense constraint computed in ExAC/gnomAD was utilized. Award PP2 if the z-score > 3.09. (applicable to MTOR, PIK3CA and AKT3 but not PIK3R2).
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP PP2 rule specifies Supporting evidence for MTOR, PIK3CA, and AKT3 when the ExAC/gnomAD missense-constraint z-score is greater than 3.09.
  • The case bundle contains no PIK3CA missense-constraint z-score, so the VCEP threshold cannot be evaluated.
Still missing
  • PIK3CA ExAC/gnomAD missense-constraint z-score is not provided; the required value must be verified as greater than 3.09.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no well-established functional study of this exact variant showing a benign effect was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification requires well-established functional evidence showing no damaging effect, assessed under the specified SVI/BMVCEP assay quality metrics and validation controls. No qualifying functional study of the exact PIK3CA p.Cys90Arg variant is present in the case bundle. PMID:29975751 evaluated other ABD substitutions, including C90Y, and therefore cannot establish a benign functional effect for C90R. BS3 is not assigned.

Rule
Applicable VCEP BS3 rule: follow ClinGen SVI recommendations together with Brain Malformation Group specifications for functional-assay quality metrics and minimum validation controls.
Evidence considered
  • The applicable Brain Malformations VCEP specification defines BS3 as well-established in vitro or in vivo functional evidence showing no damaging effect and directs review under SVI/BMVCEP quality metrics and minimum validation controls.
  • The bundle's extracted finding for PMID:29975751 reports experiments on PIK3CA C90Y and R88Q, not the case variant p.Cys90Arg; those non-identical substitutions were not used to assign BS3.
  • The case variant is NM_006218.4:c.268T>C, NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg).
Still missing
  • No variant-specific functional result demonstrating preserved PIK3CA function for p.Cys90Arg.
  • No documented assay validation controls, replicate data, or quantitative benign-effect result for the exact variant.
Sources
BP2 Not assessed: no cis/trans phase information with a known pathogenic PIK3CA variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable PIK3CA VCEP rule permits BP2 at Supporting strength when the variant is observed in cis or trans with a known pathogenic variant in the same gene. The case bundle contains no affected-proband observation, second PIK3CA variant, pathogenic partner variant, parental testing, or phase information establishing cis or trans, so BP2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
Observed in cis or trans with a known pathogenic variant in the same gene.
Evidence considered
  • The PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP rule for BP2 is: observed in cis or trans with a known pathogenic variant in the same gene.
Still missing
  • Document a known pathogenic PIK3CA partner variant in the same individual and confirm whether the variants are in cis or trans using parental, offspring, or equivalent phasing data.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no report shows this variant in a person whose phenotype has an established alternate molecular basis. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP5 remains applicable as originally described by the VCEP, but the bundle contains no individual-level report showing this variant in a person whose phenotype has an established alternate molecular basis.

Rule
Brain Malformations VCEP BP5: applicable as originally described; variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP retains BP5 without modification: it requires a variant to be found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
  • No supplied case-level or publication evidence documents an alternate molecular diagnosis for a carrier of c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg).
Still missing
  • An individual-level case report documenting an alternate molecular diagnosis that explains the phenotype is unavailable.
Sources
Not applicable · 14· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 VCEPNot applicable: this is a missense change, so the null-variant mechanisms PVS1 requires (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, canonical splice disruption) do not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_006218.4:c.268T>C in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

VCEP rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM3 VCEPNot applicable: PIK3CA brain-malformation variants are heterozygous, so the recessive in-trans requirement does not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen Brain Malformations VCEP specification marks PM3 as not applicable for PIK3CA because disease-causing variants are heterozygous; therefore the recessive in-trans requirement for PM3 does not apply in this disease context.

VCEP rule
Not applicable since disease-causing variants are heterozygous.
Evidence considered
  • The PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PM3 is not applicable because disease-causing variants are heterozygous.
Sources
PM4 VCEPNot applicable: this missense substitution does not change protein length, so there is nothing for PM4 to evaluate. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_006218.4:c.268T>C in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

VCEP rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP addresses de novo evidence through PS2, so PM6 is not used. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM6 is explicitly not applicable in the PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP specification because this de novo evidence is addressed by PS2.

VCEP rule
VCEP PM6: Not applicable; this point is addressed according to PS2 and will not be used.
Evidence considered
  • The applicable VCEP specification states that PM6 is not used and that assumed de novo evidence without maternity/paternity confirmation is addressed according to PS2.
Sources
PP1 VCEPNot applicable: disease-causing variants here are germline mosaic or de novo, not evaluated through familial cosegregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP1 is explicitly not applicable in the PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP specification because disease-causing variants in this context are germline mosaic, de novo, or mosaic rather than evaluated through familial cosegregation.

VCEP rule
VCEP PP1: Not applicable since disease-causing variants are germline mosaic, de novo, or mosaic.
Evidence considered
  • The applicable VCEP specification marks PP1 as not applicable because disease-causing variants are germline mosaic, de novo, or mosaic.
Sources
PP3 VCEPNot applicable: PIK3CA acts through gain of function, and prediction tools built for loss-of-function mechanisms do not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification explicitly makes PP3 not applicable for PIK3CA because the relevant disease mechanism is gain of function and traditional mutation-pathogenicity prediction algorithms focus on loss-of-function mechanisms.

VCEP rule
Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1 PP3: not applicable for gain-of-function variants; use may be revisited only with published experience for algorithms specifically designed to detect gain-of-function mutations.
Evidence considered
  • NM_006218.4:c.268T>C is a missense variant encoding NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg).
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PP3 is not applicable for these gain-of-function variants because traditional mutation-pathogenicity algorithms focus on loss-of-function mechanisms. Therefore the available REVEL score (0.862), BayesDel score (0.303395), and SpliceAI prediction are not used to apply PP3.
Sources
PP4 VCEPNot applicable: phenotype specificity is already accounted for under PS4 in this framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP4 is not applicable in the governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification because phenotype specificity is accounted for under PS4.

VCEP rule
Brain Malformations VCEP: PP4 not applicable; phenotype specificity is incorporated into PS4.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP explicitly states that PP4 is not applicable because this criterion is accounted for under PS4.
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP does not use PP5, and the only ClinVar record is a single non-expert Uncertain significance submission. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 is not applicable under the governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification. Independently, the exact-variant ClinVar record has only a single non-expert Uncertain significance submission and no expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic assertion.

VCEP rule
Brain Malformations VCEP: PP5 not applicable. Expert-panel-only guard: an exact-variant ClinVar Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic expert-panel assertion would be required before any PP5 consideration.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP states that PP5 is not for use.
  • ClinVar variation 1794794 exactly matches NM_006218.4:c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg), but it has one Ambry Genetics Uncertain significance submission with one-star single-submitter review status and zero expert-panel submissions; it cannot trigger PP5.
Sources
BS4 VCEPNot applicable: these are de novo, germline mosaic, or post-zygotic mutations, so lack of familial segregation is not used as BS4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS4 is explicitly not applicable in the PIK3CA Brain Malformations VCEP specification because these are de novo, germline mosaic, or post-zygotic mutations; therefore lack of familial segregation is not used as BS4 in this framework.

VCEP rule
VCEP BS4: Not applicable for this VCEP; these are de novo, germline mosaic, or post-zygotic mutations.
Evidence considered
  • The applicable VCEP specification marks BS4 as not applicable because these are de novo, germline mosaic, or post-zygotic mutations.
Sources
BP1 VCEPNot applicable: loss of function is not the disease mechanism; these brain-malformation disorders follow a gain-of-function mechanism. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP designates BP1 as not applicable because loss of function is not the disease mechanism; these PIK3CA brain-malformation disorders are treated under a gain-of-function mechanism. Therefore BP1 is not applicable to this missense variant.

Evidence considered
  • The VCEP explicitly states that BP1 is not applicable because loss of function is not the disease mechanism.
  • The VCEP BP1 instructions identify BP1 as not applicable for this specification.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: this is a missense substitution, not an in-frame insertion/deletion in a repetitive region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_006218.4:c.268T>C in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

VCEP rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP4 N/ANot applicable: BP4 is limited to synonymous or non-coding splice-site variants; this is a missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification limits BP4 to synonymous, non-canonical intronic, or UTR variants when at least two of varSEAK, SpliceAI, and MaxEntScan predict no splice impact. This is a missense variant, so BP4 cannot be applied.

Rule
Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1 BP4: applicable only to synonymous, non-canonical intronic, or UTR variants when two of varSEAK, SpliceAI, and MaxEntScan predict no splice change.
Evidence considered
  • NM_006218.4:c.268T>C is a coding missense variant encoding NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg), rather than a synonymous, intronic, or UTR variant.
  • SpliceAI reported a maximum delta score of 0.137 (no significant predicted splice impact), but this single prediction cannot satisfy the VCEP BP4 rule and does not overcome the variant-type restriction.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP does not use BP6, and the only ClinVar record is a single non-expert Uncertain significance submission. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 is not applicable under the governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification. Independently, the exact-variant ClinVar record has only a single non-expert Uncertain significance submission and no expert-panel benign or likely benign assertion.

VCEP rule
Brain Malformations VCEP: BP6 not applicable. Expert-panel-only guard: an exact-variant ClinVar Benign/Likely benign expert-panel assertion would be required before any BP6 consideration.
Evidence considered
  • The Brain Malformations VCEP states that BP6 is not for use.
  • ClinVar variation 1794794 exactly matches NM_006218.4:c.268T>C (p.Cys90Arg), but it has one Ambry Genetics Uncertain significance submission with one-star single-submitter review status and zero expert-panel submissions; it cannot trigger BP6.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense substitution, not a synonymous silent variant, so the BP7 premise does not hold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_006218.4:c.268T>C in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
PIK3CA
Transcript
NM_006218.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_006218.4:c.268T>C
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg)
GRCh38
chr3:179199093 T>C
GRCh37
chr3:178916881 T>C
Location and type
Exon 2 · missense
ClinVar
1794794
COSMIC
COSV55976286

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in PIK3CA, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_006218.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

PIK3CANM_006218.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +34 bp
0.003
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -52 bp
0.003
SpliceAI donor lossat -58 bp
0.137
SpliceAI donor gainat +84 bp
0.010
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.019
Pangolin splice gain
0.042

Other predictors

REVEL
0.862
BayesDel
0.303

How the predictions were used

PP3 VCEPNot applicable: PIK3CA acts through gain of function, and prediction tools built for loss-of-function mechanisms do not apply. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification explicitly makes PP3 not applicable for PIK3CA because the relevant disease mechanism is gain of function and traditional mutation-pathogenicity prediction algorithms focus on loss-of-function mechanisms.

VCEP rule
Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1 PP3: not applicable for gain-of-function variants; use may be revisited only with published experience for algorithms specifically designed to detect gain-of-function mutations.
Evidence considered
  • NM_006218.4:c.268T>C is a missense variant encoding NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg).
  • The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification states that PP3 is not applicable for these gain-of-function variants because traditional mutation-pathogenicity algorithms focus on loss-of-function mechanisms. Therefore the available REVEL score (0.862), BayesDel score (0.303395), and SpliceAI prediction are not used to apply PP3.
Sources
BP4 N/ANot applicable: BP4 is limited to synonymous or non-coding splice-site variants; this is a missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing Brain Malformations VCEP specification limits BP4 to synonymous, non-canonical intronic, or UTR variants when at least two of varSEAK, SpliceAI, and MaxEntScan predict no splice impact. This is a missense variant, so BP4 cannot be applied.

Rule
Brain Malformations VCEP v1.1 BP4: applicable only to synonymous, non-canonical intronic, or UTR variants when two of varSEAK, SpliceAI, and MaxEntScan predict no splice change.
Evidence considered
  • NM_006218.4:c.268T>C is a coding missense variant encoding NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg), rather than a synonymous, intronic, or UTR variant.
  • SpliceAI reported a maximum delta score of 0.137 (no significant predicted splice impact), but this single prediction cannot satisfy the VCEP BP4 rule and does not overcome the variant-type restriction.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense substitution, not a synonymous silent variant, so the BP7 premise does not hold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_006218.4:c.268T>C in PIK3CA is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_006209.2:p.(Cys90Arg). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false; framework_mode=unstructured_ruleset); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.14). REVEL score = 0.862. BayesDel score = 0.303395.

6 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • PIK3CA missense mutations promote glioblastoma pathogenesis, but do not enhance
    The paper experimentally evaluated the PIK3CA ABD mutation C90Y, but not the case variant C90R. In immortalized normal human astrocytes and mutant-RAS-expressing astrocytes, ABD PIK3CA mutants did not increase PI3K signaling, migration, or colony formation beyond wild-type PIK3CA, and C90Y was not shown to be pathogenic by the reported experiments.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 29975751 ↗
    Quoted passage
    In contrast to helical and kinase PIK3CA mutations, ABD PIK3CAmut did not increase PI3K, migration, or colony formation of NHA more than PIK3CAWT (Figs 1–3). Similar results were obtained with ABD PIK3CAmut in NHARAS. Moreover, R88Q PIK3CAmut did not promote tumorigenesis of NHARAS more than PIK3CAWT in vivo (Fig 3B and 3C). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the phenotypic consequences of ABD PIK3CAmut and ectopic over-expression of PIK3CAWT are similar.

    Discussion, paragraph beginning "In contrast to helical and kinase PIK3CA mutations"

  • Including the initial newborn screening bloodspot collection device serial number on birth certificates: basis and recommendations from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children.
    Therrell BL et al. · 2013
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23037933 ↗
  • The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.
    Fears R et al. · 2013
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23169492 ↗
  • ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23619275 ↗
  • Appropriateness of newborn screening for α1-antitrypsin deficiency.
    Teckman J et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24121147 ↗
  • Parental permission for pilot newborn screening research: guidelines from the NBSTRN.
    Botkin JR et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24394680 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 1794794)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.14). REVEL score = 0.862. BayesDel score = 0.303395.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV55976286, n = 1 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.