0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

POLE c.4519_4520del, p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)

NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37) Frameshift · exon 35 View identifiers
Classification
Likely pathogenic

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About POLE

POLE encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, the enzyme that replicates the leading strand of DNA during cell division and participates in DNA repair. It contains a proofreading domain that corrects replication errors, keeping the accumulation of mutations in check. Germline mutations in POLE cause polyposis and predispose to colorectal cancer, and are also linked to a rare syndrome of facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. Somatic mutations, particularly in the proofreading domain, occur in colorectal and endometrial cancers, where they drive an ultra-mutated tumor phenotype and are associated with better responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PVS1Very strong
PVS1 · very strong

Met (Very Strong): 2-bp frameshift (p.Gln1507AlafsTer37) in exon 35 of 49 predicted to trigger nonsense-mediated decay.

PM2Moderate
PM2 · moderate

Met (Moderate): highest observed allele frequency 0.000176%, far below the <0.1% rarity threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Likely pathogenic

No official ClinGen POLE VCEP specification exists, so standard ACMG/AMP 2015 combination logic was applied; only PVS1 (Very Strong) and PM2 (Moderate) are met.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

SpliceAI score
0.014 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.014. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
3 reported laboratory submissions

2 Uncertain significance · 1 Pathogenic. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, conflicting classifications.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. POLE, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, is an enzyme involved in DNA replication and repair. Select POLE mutations lead to ultra-high m

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 6 not met · 10 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No POLE-specific VCEP/local CSPEC covers PVS1/PM4/BP3 for germline loss-of-function variants; the local POLE package (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020) is explicitly scoped to somatic missense hotspot interpretation (PM1/PS4/PP3/BP4) and is not a germline ACMG/AMP rule set, so generic ACMG/AMP (PMC6185798 PVS1 framework) was used.

The variant is a 2-bp frameshift deletion (NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del, p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)) on the MANE Select POLE transcript, located in coding exon 35 of 49, well upstream of the terminal-exon/50bp NMD-escape boundary, predicted to trigger nonsense-mediated decay and/or truncate ~1/3 of the POLE1 protein (2287 aa to 1543 aa) including domains required for holoenzyme assembly.

Germline POLE loss-of-function is an established human disease mechanism (biallelic POLE LoF variants cause an IMAGe-syndrome-overlapping disorder with confirmed reduced POLE1 protein on immunoblot, PMID:30503519; FILS syndrome, PMID:23230001), supporting gene-level PVS1 eligibility.

PVS1 applied at full (very strong) strength; PM4 and BP3 are not applicable because both require an in-frame protein-length change, and this variant causes a frameshift rather than an in-frame indel.

NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del produces NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37), a frameshift/truncating consequence, not a missense substitution.

All five codon/residue/domain criteria assigned to this group (PS1, PM1, PM5, PP2, BP1) are defined in the ACMG/AMP framework and in the local POLE gene-specific framework (León-Castillo et al. 2020) specifically for missense variants; none can be structurally applied to a frameshift.

The local POLE framework's PM1 hotspot/domain rules target named exonuclease-domain missense substitutions (approx. residues 268-471); residue 1507 falls outside this domain and the variant type (frameshift) is outside the framework's scope entirely.

pm5_candidates.json independently confirms the pipeline could not establish classic same-residue PM5 semantics because no missense reference/alt amino acid pair exists for this variant.

Truncating-variant-specific evidence (e.g., PVS1, NMD context) belongs to other evidence groups and was not evaluated here, consistent with this group's scope being limited to PS1/PM1/PM5/PP2/BP1.

PS3/BS3 both not_assessed: the case-evidence bundle contains no variant-specific functional assay evidence (polymerase/exonuclease activity, complementation, cell-based, or splicing assay) and no PS3/BS3-specific rule in either the local POLE custom framework (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020, which addresses only PM1/PS4/PP3/BP4 for exonuclease-domain missense variants) or an official ClinGen VCEP CSPEC (none present for POLE in this case). This is a frameshift/truncating variant, further reducing relevance of the missense-focused custom framework's PM1/PP3 assay-adjacent evidence types.

This variant, NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del (p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)), is a frameshift-producing deletion, not a missense or synonymous substitution and not a canonical splice-site/splice-region variant.

PP3/BP4's missense in-silico path (BayesDel/REVEL/aGVGD) is inapplicable because REVEL and BayesDel scores are both null/not computed for this non-missense variant.

The splice-impact path was checked via SpliceAI regardless (max delta score = 0.014, all four delta scores <0.02), showing no meaningful predicted splice disruption, but this frameshift variant's primary consequence is evaluated as a coding loss-of-function event (PVS1 path) rather than as a splice-altering variant, so no PP3/BP4 call is invoked from this near-zero SpliceAI signal.

BP7 is scoped to synonymous variants and is not applicable to this frameshift deletion.

The POLE VCEP-adjacent local framework's supplementary-table PP3/BP4 lookup rule (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020, Tables S2/S3) is explicitly limited to exact-match missense variants; this frameshift deletion is not represented in those tables and the rule's own guidance states to fall back to the generic in-silico workflow when the variant is absent from the tables, which itself defaults to not_applicable for a non-missense, non-synonymous, non-splice variant.

No official ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP population specification was retrieved for POLE. The local POLE framework applies custom rules only to PM1, PS4, PP3, and BP4; BA1, BS1, BS2, and PM2 were adjudicated using generic ACMG/AMP fallback.

The gnomAD v4.1 highest observed frequency is 1.75932e-06 (0.000176%), based on one allele in the non-Finnish European XY subset; it is far below the generic BA1 (>1%) and BS1 (>0.3%) thresholds.

PM2 is met at Moderate strength because the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 and is observed once in gnomAD v4.1 at a frequency far below 0.1%.

BS2 is not met because there are no qualifying phenotype- and age-documented unaffected carrier observations; the absence of homozygotes in gnomAD v4.1 cannot support BS2.

Met · 2

PVS1 Very strongMet (Very Strong): 2-bp frameshift (p.Gln1507AlafsTer37) in exon 35 of 49 predicted to trigger nonsense-mediated decay. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No POLE-specific VCEP CSPEC or local gene-specific framework was found for PVS1 (cspec.found = false; the only local POLE package, Leon-Castillo et al. 2020, addresses somatic missense hotspots in endometrial carcinoma and explicitly is not a germline ACMG/AMP rule specification). Fell back to the generic ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798) per pvs1_variant_assessment, which flags this transcript as eligible for the generic PVS1 decision tree. NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is a 2-bp frameshift deletion (variant_class/consequence_class = frameshift) predicted to produce NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37) on the MANE Select transcript (mane_select=true). The variant lies in coding exon 35 of 49 total exons (c.4445-4551 exon boundary; well upstream of the terminal exon and not within the last 50 bp of the penultimate exon), so the resulting premature termination codon is predicted to trigger nonsense-mediated decay rather than escape it. Even assuming residual translation, the predicted truncated protein (1543 aa) removes roughly a third of the 2287-aa POLE1 protein, including the C-terminal zinc-finger/CysA-CysB domains required for POLE4/POLE2 subunit interactions and holoenzyme assembly, downstream of the N-terminal polymerase/exonuclease catalytic domains. Germline loss-of-function is an established POLE disease mechanism: PMID:30503519 (Logan et al.) reports 15 individuals from 12 families with biallelic POLE LoF variants (nonsense, frameshift, essential splice-site) causing an IMAGe-syndrome-overlapping phenotype with immunodeficiency, confirming markedly reduced POLE1 protein levels (5-11% of control) on immunoblot in LoF-variant carriers, directly demonstrating that POLE truncating/LoF variants produce a loss-of-function/haploinsufficiency-compatible molecular phenotype in humans. PMID:23230001 (FILS syndrome) and the targeted germline literature search in pvs1_gene_context (lof_mechanism_supported=true, pvs1_gene_gate=eligible) corroborate that POLE loss-of-function is an accepted germline disease mechanism, satisfying the gene-level PVS1 eligibility gate. None of the downgrade_considerations in pvs1_variant_assessment apply: transcript relevance is confirmed (MANE Select), NMD is predicted to occur (not escaped), the truncation removes essential C-terminal protein sequence rather than affecting only a non-critical distal region, and the exon is not reported as enriched for population LoF variation. PVS1 is therefore applied at full (very strong) strength under the generic PMC6185798 framework.

Rule
PVS1 (generic PMC6185798 framework, frameshift variant predicted to undergo NMD in a gene with an established germline loss-of-function disease mechanism)
Evidence considered
  • pvs1_variant_assessment.json: consequence_class='frameshift', variant_bucket='frameshift', protein_1l='NP_006222.2:p.(Q1507Afs*37)', apply_generic_pvs1_framework=true, suggested_default_strength='PVS1', framework_source=PMC6185798.
  • pvs1_gene_context.json: germline_disease_context_found=true, lof_mechanism_supported=true, pvs1_gene_gate='eligible'; no official CSPEC/VCEP POLE PVS1 framework exists so generic fallback per PMC6185798 was used.
  • prefetch.json VariantValidator exon/CDS map: variant falls in coding exon 35 of 49 total exons (c.4445-4551), far from the terminal exon/penultimate-exon 50bp NMD-escape boundary, supporting NMD.
  • prefetch.json protein prediction: position_last_original=2287 aa (wild-type POLE1 length) vs position_last_predicted=1543 aa for the frameshifted product, a substantial truncation removing C-terminal protein sequence.
  • PMID:30503519 (Logan et al., DNA Polymerase Epsilon Deficiency Causes IMAGe Syndrome...): reports biallelic POLE loss-of-function variants (nonsense/frameshift/splice) in 15 individuals; immunoblot in subject fibroblasts confirmed markedly reduced POLE1 protein (5% and 11% of control levels), directly evidencing that POLE truncating variants produce a loss-of-function molecular phenotype in humans.
  • PMID:23230001 (FILS syndrome, Pachlopnik Schmid et al.): establishes POLE loss-of-function/hypomorphic alleles as a germline human disease mechanism, supporting gene-level PVS1 eligibility.
  • index_guidance/vcep_materials: the only local POLE VCEP-style package (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020, PATH-250-323) addresses somatic missense hotspots for PM1/PS4/PP3/BP4 only and explicitly states it is not a germline ACMG/AMP rule specification, confirming no gene-specific PVS1 override exists.
Still missing
  • No POLE-specific VCEP PVS1 exon-criticality or NMD-boundary table was available; the last-exon/50-bp-rule determination was made from generic exon coordinates rather than an official POLE PVS1 decision table.
  • Exact zygosity of this variant in the tested individual is not documented in the bundle; the cited functional LoF evidence (PMID:30503519) derives from biallelic carriers, so the molecular consequence (frameshift, NMD, protein truncation) is used here rather than inheritance pattern.
Sources
pvs1_variant_assessmentpvs1_gene_contextpvs1_generic_framework ↗PMID:30503519 ↗PMID:23230001 ↗
PM2 ModerateMet (Moderate): highest observed allele frequency 0.000176%, far below the <0.1% rarity threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is met at Moderate strength under the generic ACMG/AMP fallback. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 and occurs once in gnomAD v4.1 (overall AF 6.19631e-07; highest reported subset AF 1.75932e-06), with no homozygotes. These frequencies are far below the generic operational PM2 rarity threshold of <0.1% and are not near a threshold boundary.

Rule
{'framework': 'generic_acmg_fallback', 'strength': 'Moderate', 'threshold': '<0.1% allele frequency', 'interpretation': 'PM2 applies to a variant absent from controls or present only at a frequency far below the generic rare-variant threshold; no POLE-specific specification was available.'}
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the variant as absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports one allele among 1,613,864 total alleles (overall AF 6.19631e-07; 0 homozygotes); highest reported frequency is 1/568,400 non-Finnish European XY alleles (AF 1.75932e-06).
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports the variant as absent.
  • The highest observed AF (0.000176%) is far below the generic operational PM2 threshold of <0.1%; a single observed allele does not preclude PM2 under this rarity rule.
Still missing
  • No POLE-specific PM2 threshold or disease-specific maximum credible allele frequency was retrieved.
Sources

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS4 Not met: this frameshift is outside the defined POLE somatic hotspot set and has no COSMIC record. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable local POLE PS4 specification is limited to selected exact recurrent POLE missense hotspot variants in endometrial-carcinoma cohorts. This frameshift variant, p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37), is outside that defined set and has no reported somatic COSMIC record; therefore PS4 is not met.

Rule
Local POLE PS4 rule: apply PS4_Supporting only to the specified exact recurrent POLE missense variants with combined COSMIC and TCGA endometrial-carcinoma count >=10; do not exceed Supporting.
Evidence considered
  • The local POLE framework permits PS4_Supporting only for specified exact recurrent POLE missense variants (P286R, V411L, A456P, and S297F) with combined endometrial-carcinoma cohort count at least 10; it is capped at Supporting because it represents somatic recurrence rather than germline case-control evidence.
  • The queried variant is a frameshift, NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del / p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37), not one of the framework's specified missense variants.
  • OncoKB reports no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant, and the consolidated evidence bundle reports no COSMIC result for the exact variant.
Sources
final_classification_frameworkoncokb ↗
PP5 Not met: ClinVar contains no expert-panel pathogenic assertion for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic assertion. The reported pathogenic submission is an ordinary single clinical-laboratory submission and is ineligible for PP5.

Rule
Apply PP5 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification.
Evidence considered
  • For exact ClinVar Variation ID 2443222, the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions. The pathogenic assertion is from Labcorp and has review status 'criteria provided, single submitter'; it is not an expert-panel assertion.
Sources
BA1 Not met: highest allele frequency 0.000176%, far below the >1% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The highest observed frequency is 1/568,400 alleles in the gnomAD v4.1 non-Finnish European XY subset (AF 1.75932e-06; 0.000176%), with overall AF 6.19631e-07 (1/1,613,864). These frequencies are far below the generic BA1 threshold of >1%.

Rule
{'framework': 'generic_acmg_fallback', 'threshold': '>1% allele frequency', 'interpretation': 'BA1 requires a population frequency sufficiently common for a benign classification; the highest observed frequency is far below this threshold.'}
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the variant as absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports one allele among 1,613,864 total alleles (AF 6.19631e-07; 0 homozygotes); the highest reported subset frequency is 1/568,400 non-Finnish European XY alleles (AF 1.75932e-06; 0 homozygotes).
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports the variant as absent.
  • No official ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP population specification was retrieved for POLE; the local POLE framework customizes only PM1, PS4, PP3, and BP4, so generic ACMG/AMP population thresholds apply.
Sources
BS1 Not met: highest allele frequency 0.000176%, far below the >0.3% BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The highest observed allele frequency is 1.75932e-06 (0.000176%) in the gnomAD v4.1 non-Finnish European XY subset, far below the generic operational BS1 threshold of >0.3%. The observation is a single allele in a large subset and does not create an ancestry-specific threshold artifact.

Rule
{'framework': 'generic_acmg_fallback', 'threshold': '>0.3% allele frequency', 'interpretation': 'BS1 requires an allele frequency greater than expected for the disorder; no POLE-specific maximum credible frequency was available, so the generic operational threshold was used.'}
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the variant as absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports one allele among 1,613,864 total alleles (AF 6.19631e-07); the highest subset frequency is 1/568,400 non-Finnish European XY alleles (AF 1.75932e-06). No homozygotes are reported.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports the variant as absent.
  • The highest observed AF is far below the generic BS1 operational threshold of >0.3%.
Still missing
  • No POLE disease-specific prevalence, penetrance, or maximum credible allele-frequency threshold was retrieved.
Sources
BS2 Not met: zero homozygotes in gnomAD v4.1 and no unaffected-carrier observations. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not met. gnomAD v4.1 reports zero homozygotes, and the bundle contains no phenotype- and age-documented unaffected homozygous individuals or other qualifying unaffected carrier observations. Absence of a qualifying observation cannot support BS2.

Rule
{'framework': 'generic_acmg_fallback', 'requirement': 'Observation in healthy adult individuals for a disorder expected to be fully penetrant at an early age', 'interpretation': 'No qualifying phenotype- and age-documented unaffected carrier observation is available.'}
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 report the variant as absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 1,613,864 alleles and provides no individual-level phenotype or age data for its one heterozygous carrier.
  • No official ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP BS2 specification was retrieved for POLE; generic ACMG/AMP BS2 requires qualifying observations in unaffected individuals.
Still missing
  • No phenotype-annotated, adequately aged unaffected homozygous individuals or qualifying unaffected carrier cohort was identified.
Sources
BP6 Not met: ClinVar contains no expert-panel benign assertion for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely benign assertion. The two uncertain-significance submissions are ordinary clinical-laboratory submissions and are ineligible for BP6.

Rule
Apply BP6 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification.
Evidence considered
  • For exact ClinVar Variation ID 2443222, the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions. The available non-expert submissions are two uncertain-significance assertions and one pathogenic assertion.
Sources

Not assessed · 10 · no assessment recorded

PS2 Not assessed: no documented de novo occurrence or parental testing was available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No confirmed de novo occurrence is documented for NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del (p.Gln1507AlafsTer37). The bundle contains no proband phenotype, parental genotype, parentage confirmation, or parental mosaicism assessment.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2: requires a de novo variant in a patient with the disease and no family history, with maternity and paternity confirmed; this evidence is not present.
Evidence considered
  • No ClinGen CSPEC is available for POLE. The local POLE framework customizes PM1, PS4, PP3, and BP4 only; PS2 is therefore assessed using generic ACMG/AMP logic.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides variant normalization and ClinVar/literature records but no case-level de novo or parental-testing observation for this variant.
Still missing
  • Obtain the proband phenotype and indication for testing.
  • Perform targeted testing of both biological parents for the variant, with parentage confirmation where feasible.
  • Assess possible parental mosaicism if the variant is absent in routine parental blood testing.
PS3 Not assessed: no functional assay evidence for this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No functional/experimental assay evidence (in vitro polymerase activity, exonuclease proofreading assay, complementation, cell-based, or minigene splicing assay) for NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is present anywhere in the case-evidence bundle. The local POLE custom framework (derived from Leon-Castillo et al. 2020) covers only PM1 (exonuclease-domain hotspot missense), PS4 (somatic EC cohort recurrence), PP3, and BP4 (in silico) for missense substitutions in the exonuclease domain; it contains no PS3 specification and is not applicable to this frameshift/truncating variant. No ClinGen POLE VCEP CSPEC was found (cspec.found=false in case_summary.json). The three functional-themed ClinVar-linked papers (PMID 23230001, 25948378, 30503519) describe clinical case series of patients with biallelic POLE hypomorphic missense/splice variants causing FILS/IMAGe-like syndromes; they report patient phenotypes and molecular findings for their own reported variants, not a validated functional assay of this exact variant (p.Gln1507Alafs*37), so they cannot be used to support PS3 without risking ungrounded citation.

Still missing
  • No variant-specific functional/complementation/enzymatic assay data available for this variant
  • No applicable VCEP or local gene-specific PS3 rule specification exists for this gene/variant type
  • None of the retrieved ClinVar-linked publications report a functional assay of this exact variant
PM3 Not assessed: no observation of this variant with a second pathogenic POLE variant, or phase/segregation data, was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed. The POLE local framework does not specify PM3, so generic ACMG/AMP allelic-evidence logic applies; however, the bundle contains no affected-proband observation of NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del with a second pathogenic/likely pathogenic POLE variant, no phase determination, and no segregation data establishing trans configuration.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM3 fallback: require the target variant to be observed in an affected individual in trans with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant for a recessive disease; no POLE-specific PM3 specification was retrieved.
Evidence considered
  • No ClinGen CSPEC was retrieved for POLE. The governing local POLE framework customizes only PM1, PS4, PP3, and BP4 and directs generic ACMG/AMP fallback outside that scope.
  • The normalized target is NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del, predicted NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37). The case bundle contains no target-variant affected-proband genotype, co-occurring POLE variant, trans/cis phase result, or segregation result.
  • ClinVar lists three germline submissions for the exact variant but the supplied record contains no co-occurrence or phase evidence; its submitter classifications were not used to infer PM3.
Still missing
  • Affected-proband genotype data identifying any second POLE variant.
  • Laboratory or family-based phase evidence showing that NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is in trans with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic POLE variant.
  • Phenotype and inheritance information supporting a recessive POLE disease context for any potential biallelic observation.
PM6 Not assessed: no reported de novo occurrence, even without confirmed parentage, was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No reported de novo occurrence without confirmed parentage is available for this variant. There is also no proband phenotype or parental testing record from which to evaluate a de novo assertion.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6: a de novo occurrence may be considered when maternity and paternity are not confirmed; no such occurrence is documented here.
Evidence considered
  • No ClinGen CSPEC is available for POLE, and the local POLE framework does not specify PM6; generic ACMG/AMP logic applies.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no case-level parental testing or de novo assertion for NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del.
Still missing
  • Obtain a documented de novo observation for the exact variant.
  • If parentage cannot be confirmed, provide both parental targeted-test results and the proband phenotype/diagnosis.
PP1 Not assessed: no family segregation data was reported for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No informative affected or unaffected relatives, genotypes, phenotypes, pedigrees, or meioses are reported for the exact variant. Segregation cannot be evaluated.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1: requires co-segregation of the variant with disease in multiple affected family members; no segregation observations are available.
Evidence considered
  • No ClinGen CSPEC is available for POLE, and the local POLE framework does not specify PP1; generic ACMG/AMP logic applies.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family segregation dataset for NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del.
Still missing
  • Provide a pedigree with disease status and age/phenotype information for tested relatives.
  • Provide targeted variant results for informative relatives and the number of independent informative meioses.
PP4 Not assessed: no proband phenotype or diagnosis data was supplied to evaluate phenotypic specificity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No proband phenotype, diagnosis, or phenotype-to-gene differential data are supplied for this case. Phenotypic specificity for a POLE-associated disorder cannot be evaluated.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP4: phenotype or family history must be highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains variant-level, database, and literature-triage information but no affected individual's phenotype or diagnostic workup.
Still missing
  • Clinical phenotype, indication for testing, and relevant differential diagnoses for the individual carrying the variant are required.
BS3 Not assessed: no functional assay evidence of normal activity was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No functional assay evidence of normal/wild-type activity is present in the case-evidence bundle for this variant, and no applicable PS3/BS3 rule specification exists in the local POLE custom framework (which is limited to PM1/PS4/PP3/BP4 for exonuclease-domain missense variants) or from any official ClinGen POLE VCEP CSPEC (none found: cspec.found=false). No assay data of any kind (functional, complementation, or otherwise) contradicting a deleterious effect was identified for this frameshift/truncating variant.

Still missing
  • No functional assay data of any kind (showing normal or abnormal activity) available for this variant
  • No applicable VCEP or local gene-specific BS3 rule specification exists for this gene/variant type
BS4 Not assessed: no affected non-carriers or unaffected carriers were reported to test segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No well-phenotyped affected non-carriers or clearly unaffected carriers are reported. Consequently, lack of segregation cannot be established.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4: requires lack of segregation in affected family members; no informative family data are available.
Evidence considered
  • No ClinGen CSPEC is available for POLE, and the local POLE framework does not specify BS4; generic ACMG/AMP logic applies.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no non-segregation evidence for NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del.
Still missing
  • Provide a pedigree and genotype/phenotype data for informative relatives.
  • Document whether any affected relatives lack the variant, considering age-dependent penetrance and phenocopies where relevant.
BP2 Not assessed: no data on this variant in cis with another pathogenic POLE variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed. The POLE local framework does not specify BP2, so generic ACMG/AMP allelic-evidence logic applies; the bundle contains no observation showing NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del in cis with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic POLE variant, nor an observation of the relevant pair in an individual whose phenotype establishes that the cis combination is non-causative.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP2 fallback: require documented cis co-occurrence with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, or another qualifying non-causative co-occurrence observation under the relevant inheritance model; no POLE-specific BP2 specification was retrieved.
Evidence considered
  • No ClinGen CSPEC was retrieved for POLE. The governing local POLE framework customizes only PM1, PS4, PP3, and BP4 and directs generic ACMG/AMP fallback outside that scope.
  • The case bundle contains no target-variant co-occurrence observation, no cis phase result, and no unaffected or phenotype-discordant carrier evidence relevant to BP2.
  • ClinVar lists three germline submissions for the exact variant but the supplied record contains no co-occurrence or phase evidence; its submitter classifications were not used to infer BP2.
Still missing
  • A documented co-occurring pathogenic/likely pathogenic POLE variant.
  • Phase evidence establishing cis configuration with NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del.
  • Phenotype, inheritance, and genotype information demonstrating that the observed cis configuration is not causative for the relevant disease.
BP5 Not assessed: no evidence of an alternative cause for the presenting condition was supplied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No individual-level phenotype, molecular diagnosis, or evidence for an alternative cause of the presenting condition is supplied. BP5 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP5: variant is found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no proband-level diagnostic or phenotype information.
Still missing
  • A documented molecular diagnosis that fully explains the individual's phenotype, together with the phenotype and testing context, is required.
Not applicable · 10· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/ANot applicable: PS1 applies only to missense variants, and this is a frameshift deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 requires the same predicted amino-acid change as an established pathogenic variant, resulting from a different nucleotide change at the same codon. NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is a 2-bp deletion producing a frameshift, NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37), not a missense (single amino-acid substitution). PS1 is defined for missense variants only and cannot be evaluated for a frameshift.

Evidence considered
  • Normalized protein consequence p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37) confirms a frameshift, not a missense substitution, so PS1's same-amino-acid-change comparison is structurally inapplicable.
PM1 N/ANot applicable: PM1 covers exonuclease-domain missense hotspots; this frameshift lies outside that domain at residue 1507. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing local POLE framework (derived from León-Castillo et al. 2020, J Pathol 250:323-335) defines PM1 exclusively for missense substitutions within the exonuclease domain: PM1_Strong for the five hotspots (P286R, V411L, S297F, A456P, S459F), PM1_Moderate for a named set of recurrent exonuclease-domain missense variants, and PM1_Supporting for a named uncertain-tier set. Residue 1507 falls in the C-terminal region of POLE (well outside the N-terminal exonuclease domain spanning roughly residues 268-471), and the variant itself is a frameshift, not a missense substitution at any of the named hotspot/recurrent codons. Neither the hotspot list nor the domain-boundary rationale in the framework applies to this variant type or location.

Rule
PM1 (local POLE framework, León-Castillo et al. 2020) applies only to named exonuclease-domain missense substitutions; not applicable to frameshift variants or residues outside the covered domain/hotspot list.
Evidence considered
  • León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework restricts PM1 to specific exonuclease-domain missense substitutions (P286R, V411L, S297F, A456P, S459F at Strong; F367S, L424I, M295R, P436R, M444K, D368Y at Moderate; A465V, L424V, T278M, A428T at Supporting). p.(Gln1507Afs*37) is a frameshift at residue 1507, well outside this exonuclease-domain hotspot/recurrence set and outside the domain the framework addresses, so PM1 does not apply.
Still missing
  • No POLE-specific mutational hotspot/domain map was available for the C-terminal region encompassing residue 1507; only the exonuclease-domain hotspot table from León-Castillo et al. was provided.
Sources
vcep_path_250_323
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 applies to in-frame indels; this 2-bp deletion shifts the reading frame. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 applies specifically to in-frame insertions/deletions that alter protein length without disrupting reading frame, or to stop-loss variants. NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is a 2-bp deletion that shifts the reading frame (consequence_class='frameshift', p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)) rather than removing/adding a whole number of codons in-frame, and it is not a stop-loss variant. The protein-length change here is a consequence of the frameshift/premature termination captured under PVS1, not an in-frame length alteration, so PM4 does not apply to this variant type.

Evidence considered
  • pvs1_variant_assessment.json: consequence_class='frameshift', variant_bucket='frameshift' confirms a 2-nucleotide net deletion causing a frameshift rather than an in-frame deletion, so the PM4 criterion (in-frame indel or stop-loss protein-length change) is not applicable to this variant class.
Sources
pvs1_variant_assessment
PM5 N/ANot applicable: PM5 requires an established pathogenic missense at the same residue; this is a frameshift. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 requires a novel missense change at a residue where a different missense change has already been established as pathogenic. The PM5 comparator-candidate workup for this case explicitly could not parse a missense residue/reference-amino-acid/alt-amino-acid context because the variant is a frameshift deletion, not a missense substitution, so classic same-residue PM5 semantics do not apply.

Evidence considered
  • pm5_candidates.json reports pm5_mode='unknown', eligible_for_classic_pm5_search=false, and reason='Unable to confirm classic same-residue PM5 semantics safely; skipping automatic candidate harvesting' because the normalized consequence p.(Gln1507Afs*37) is a frameshift rather than a missense change at a defined residue.
Sources
pm5_candidates
PP2 N/ANot applicable: PP2 is missense-specific, and this variant is a truncating frameshift. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 applies to missense variants in genes where missense is a common mechanism of disease and benign missense is uncommon. NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del produces a frameshift (p.Gln1507Alafs*37), not a missense variant, so PP2's missense-specific gene-constraint logic cannot be evaluated for this variant.

Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is a frameshift deletion, not a missense substitution, so PP2 (a missense-only criterion) is not applicable regardless of POLE's missense-tolerance profile.
PP3 N/ANot applicable: in-silico tools are not computed for frameshifts; SpliceAI max delta 0.014 shows no splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is a 2-bp coding deletion (p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)) producing a frameshift, not a missense or splice-region substitution, so the missense in-silico path (BayesDel/REVEL/aGVGD) does not apply - REVEL and BayesDel are both null/not computed for this variant. The variant is also not annotated as a canonical splice-site or splice-region change, so it is not being evaluated for a splice-altering mechanism distinct from its coding frameshift consequence. SpliceAI was nonetheless checked for completeness: max delta score = 0.014 (DS_AG 0.005, DS_AL 0.014, DS_DG 0.014, DS_DL 0.001), far below any threshold (e.g. 0.2) that would suggest an SpliceAI-predicted splice disruption, so there is no computational splice-impact signal to support PP3 even under the splice-impact path. The POLE VCEP-adjacent custom framework's PP3/BP4 lookup rule (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020 supplementary tables S2/S3) is explicitly scoped to missense variants matched by exact identity in those tables and does not cover frameshift deletions, so it is not applicable here either.

Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json / evidence.json: variant is NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del, NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37), consequence_class = frameshift.
  • evidence.json revel block: score null, found null (not applicable, non-missense variant).
  • evidence.json bayesdel block: score null, found null, source_file null (not applicable, non-missense variant).
  • evidence.json spliceai block: evidence_sentence 'SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01)'; scores DS_AG=0.005, DS_AL=0.014, DS_DG=0.014, DS_DL=0.001, max_delta_score=0.014 - well below any splice-disruption threshold.
  • vcep_materials.json / index_guidance: POLE local literature PP3/BP4 rule (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020, Supp Tables S2/S3) is defined only for exact-match missense variants with REVEL class and benign in-silico tool counts; does not cover frameshift deletions, so this custom rule is out of scope for this variant.
Still missing
  • Variant class (frameshift deletion) falls outside the scope of both the missense in-silico path and any splice-specific computational rule; no applicable calibrated PP3 evidence exists for this variant.
Sources
BP1 N/ANot applicable: BP1 evaluates missense variants in truncating-only disease genes; this variant is itself truncating. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where only truncating variants are known to cause disease, used to argue against pathogenicity of a missense change. This variant is itself a truncating frameshift (p.Gln1507Alafs*37), not a missense substitution, so BP1's missense-specific logic is inapplicable; a frameshift cannot be assessed against a criterion designed to evaluate missense variants in truncating-only-mechanism genes.

Evidence considered
  • Variant consequence is a frameshift deletion, not a missense substitution, so BP1 (a missense-only criterion) is not applicable.
BP3 N/ANot applicable: BP3 covers in-frame indels in repetitive regions; this is an out-of-frame deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region with no known functional significance. Because this variant is a frameshift (out-of-frame) deletion rather than an in-frame indel, the structural premise for BP3 (a repeat-region in-frame change presumed tolerated) does not apply; the variant instead produces a premature termination codon evaluated under PVS1.

Evidence considered
  • pvs1_variant_assessment.json: consequence_class='frameshift' confirms this is not an in-frame indel, so BP3 (in-frame indel in a non-critical repetitive region) is not applicable to this variant class.
Sources
pvs1_variant_assessment
BP4 N/ANot applicable: REVEL/BayesDel are not computed for frameshifts, and SpliceAI max delta 0.014 shows no splice disruption. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

As with PP3, BP4 (calibrated computational evidence suggesting no deleterious effect) applies to missense variants via BayesDel/REVEL/aGVGD or to variants with a splice-impact question. This variant is a frameshift deletion (p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)); REVEL and BayesDel are not computed (null), so the missense in-silico path cannot be assessed either for or against. SpliceAI max delta = 0.014 is very low, consistent with no predicted splice disruption, but this is not being used to invoke a benign splice-impact BP4 call because the variant's primary molecular consequence is a coding frameshift/PVS1-type loss-of-function event, not a splice-region variant where an absence of predicted splice disruption would itself be diagnostic. The POLE local supplementary-table lookup rule for BP4 is scoped to exact-match missense variants only and this frameshift deletion is not present in Table S2/S3, so that custom rule does not apply.

Evidence considered
  • evidence.json revel/bayesdel blocks: both null, confirming non-missense variant type precludes the missense in-silico path.
  • evidence.json spliceai block: max_delta_score = 0.014, low, but not being invoked as splice-impact BP4 support since the variant's governing consequence is coding frameshift (evaluated separately under PVS1), not splicing.
  • vcep_materials.json: POLE local PP3/BP4 supplementary-table rule requires the exact variant to appear in Table S2 or S3 with a REVEL class - this frameshift deletion is not represented in those missense-focused tables.
Still missing
  • No calibrated missense in-silico predictor score is available (REVEL/BayesDel both null) because the variant is not a missense substitution.
  • Variant is not represented in the POLE VCEP-adjacent supplementary tables (S2/S3), so the local lookup-based BP4 rule cannot be applied by exact match.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies to synonymous variants; this is a 2-bp frameshift deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants with no predicted splice impact. NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is a 2-bp coding deletion causing a frameshift (p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)), not a synonymous substitution, so BP7 is categorically not applicable regardless of the SpliceAI result.

Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json: variant consequence is frameshift (c.4519_4520del, p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)), not synonymous, so BP7 criterion scope is not met.

Identifiers

Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)
GRCh38
chr12:132643254 CTG>C
GRCh37
chr12:133219840 CTG>C
Location and type
Exon 35 · frameshift
ClinVar
2443222

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in POLE, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_006231.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

POLENM_006231.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 1 / 1,613,864 alleles AF 6.2e-07 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 6.2e-07 · 1 / 1,613,864 alleles · 0 hom
European (non-Finnish)1 / 1,180,044 8.5e-07
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19631e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613864 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.47426e-07; MAF= 0.00008%, 1/1180044 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +38 bp
0.014
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -496 bp
0.005
SpliceAI donor lossat -30 bp
0.001
SpliceAI donor gainat +463 bp
0.014
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.053
Pangolin splice gain
0.006

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/ANot applicable: in-silico tools are not computed for frameshifts; SpliceAI max delta 0.014 shows no splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is a 2-bp coding deletion (p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)) producing a frameshift, not a missense or splice-region substitution, so the missense in-silico path (BayesDel/REVEL/aGVGD) does not apply - REVEL and BayesDel are both null/not computed for this variant. The variant is also not annotated as a canonical splice-site or splice-region change, so it is not being evaluated for a splice-altering mechanism distinct from its coding frameshift consequence. SpliceAI was nonetheless checked for completeness: max delta score = 0.014 (DS_AG 0.005, DS_AL 0.014, DS_DG 0.014, DS_DL 0.001), far below any threshold (e.g. 0.2) that would suggest an SpliceAI-predicted splice disruption, so there is no computational splice-impact signal to support PP3 even under the splice-impact path. The POLE VCEP-adjacent custom framework's PP3/BP4 lookup rule (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020 supplementary tables S2/S3) is explicitly scoped to missense variants matched by exact identity in those tables and does not cover frameshift deletions, so it is not applicable here either.

Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json / evidence.json: variant is NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del, NP_006222.2:p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37), consequence_class = frameshift.
  • evidence.json revel block: score null, found null (not applicable, non-missense variant).
  • evidence.json bayesdel block: score null, found null, source_file null (not applicable, non-missense variant).
  • evidence.json spliceai block: evidence_sentence 'SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01)'; scores DS_AG=0.005, DS_AL=0.014, DS_DG=0.014, DS_DL=0.001, max_delta_score=0.014 - well below any splice-disruption threshold.
  • vcep_materials.json / index_guidance: POLE local literature PP3/BP4 rule (Leon-Castillo et al. 2020, Supp Tables S2/S3) is defined only for exact-match missense variants with REVEL class and benign in-silico tool counts; does not cover frameshift deletions, so this custom rule is out of scope for this variant.
Still missing
  • Variant class (frameshift deletion) falls outside the scope of both the missense in-silico path and any splice-specific computational rule; no applicable calibrated PP3 evidence exists for this variant.
Sources
BP4 N/ANot applicable: REVEL/BayesDel are not computed for frameshifts, and SpliceAI max delta 0.014 shows no splice disruption. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

As with PP3, BP4 (calibrated computational evidence suggesting no deleterious effect) applies to missense variants via BayesDel/REVEL/aGVGD or to variants with a splice-impact question. This variant is a frameshift deletion (p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)); REVEL and BayesDel are not computed (null), so the missense in-silico path cannot be assessed either for or against. SpliceAI max delta = 0.014 is very low, consistent with no predicted splice disruption, but this is not being used to invoke a benign splice-impact BP4 call because the variant's primary molecular consequence is a coding frameshift/PVS1-type loss-of-function event, not a splice-region variant where an absence of predicted splice disruption would itself be diagnostic. The POLE local supplementary-table lookup rule for BP4 is scoped to exact-match missense variants only and this frameshift deletion is not present in Table S2/S3, so that custom rule does not apply.

Evidence considered
  • evidence.json revel/bayesdel blocks: both null, confirming non-missense variant type precludes the missense in-silico path.
  • evidence.json spliceai block: max_delta_score = 0.014, low, but not being invoked as splice-impact BP4 support since the variant's governing consequence is coding frameshift (evaluated separately under PVS1), not splicing.
  • vcep_materials.json: POLE local PP3/BP4 supplementary-table rule requires the exact variant to appear in Table S2 or S3 with a REVEL class - this frameshift deletion is not represented in those missense-focused tables.
Still missing
  • No calibrated missense in-silico predictor score is available (REVEL/BayesDel both null) because the variant is not a missense substitution.
  • Variant is not represented in the POLE VCEP-adjacent supplementary tables (S2/S3), so the local lookup-based BP4 rule cannot be applied by exact match.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies to synonymous variants; this is a 2-bp frameshift deletion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants with no predicted splice impact. NM_006231.4:c.4519_4520del is a 2-bp coding deletion causing a frameshift (p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)), not a synonymous substitution, so BP7 is categorically not applicable regardless of the SpliceAI result.

Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json: variant consequence is frameshift (c.4519_4520del, p.(Gln1507AlafsTer37)), not synonymous, so BP7 criterion scope is not met.

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01).

4 paper records listed. 2 cited in the classification. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Cited in the classification

  • Polymerase &#x3b5;1 mutation in a human syndrome with facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature ("FILS syndrome").
    Pachlopnik Schmid J et al. · 2012 Dec 17
    Describes FILS syndrome, caused by a homozygous POLE hypomorphic/loss-of-function variant, establishing POLE loss-of-function as a recognized germline human disease mechanism affecting DNA replication/repair.
    → PVS1 · very strong Does not name this variant
    PMID 23230001 ↗
    Source detail
    Here, we report that a homozygous single base pair substitution

    Location Abstract

    Context Case report/gene discovery describing a homozygous POLE variant causing FILS syndrome (facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, short stature).

  • DNA Polymerase Epsilon Deficiency Causes IMAGe Syndrome with Variable Immunodeficiency.
    Logan CV et al. · 2018 Dec 6
    Whole-genome/targeted sequencing identified biallelic (compound heterozygous) POLE loss-of-function variants (nonsense, frameshift, essential splice-site changes) in 15 individuals from 12 families with an IMAGe-syndrome-overlapping phenotype (severe pre/postnatal growth failure, adrenal insufficiency, genitourinary abnormalities, and variable immunodeficiency). Immunoblotting of patient fibroblasts confirmed markedly reduced POLE1 protein levels in carriers of POLE LoF variants, directly demonstrating a loss-of-function molecular consequence.
    → PVS1 · very strong Does not name this variant
    PMID 30503519 ↗
    Source detail
    Subsequent immunoblotting of total protein extracts from of primary fibroblasts from affected subjects confirmed that POLE1 levels were indeed markedly depleted (Figure 3; 5% ± 3% for P1 and 11% ± 4% P3, relative to the mean of both control subjects and normalized to vinculin loading control...)

    Location Main text, Results/Discussion; Table 1 (biallelic POLE mutations); Figure 3 (POLE1 immunoblot)

    Context Whole-genome/whole-exome sequencing of 48 individuals with microcephalic primordial dwarfism/IMAGe-syndrome features; RNA studies, minigene splicing assay, and immunoblotting in patient-derived primary fibroblasts to confirm POLE1 protein depletion in biallelic LoF-variant carriers.

Other recorded publications

  • A patient with polymerase E1 deficiency (POLE1): clinical features and overlap with DNA breakage/instability syndromes.
    Thiffault I et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25948378 ↗
  • A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
    Hampel H et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25394175 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19631e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613864 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.47426e-07; MAF= 0.00008%, 1/1180044 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (2 clinical laboratories) and as Pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 2443222)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01).

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. POLE, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, is an enzyme involved in DNA replication and repair. Select POLE mutations lead to ultra-high m

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.