0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

BRCA1 c.2501G>A, p.(Gly834Glu)

NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A NP_009225.1:p.(Gly834Glu) Missense · exon 10 View identifiers
Classification
Likely benign

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely benign. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely benign.A likely benign classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About BRCA1

BRCA1 encodes a large nuclear protein that helps maintain genomic stability by coordinating the repair of DNA double-strand breaks through homologous recombination, and it also regulates transcription and the cell cycle. It acts as a tumor suppressor, working with proteins such as RAD51, BRCA2, BARD1, and PALB2 to preserve genome integrity. Inherited alterations in BRCA1 cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, with elevated risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers, and biallelic loss underlies a rare form of Fanconi anemia. Because BRCA1-driven tumors rely on impaired DNA repair, they are treatable with PARP inhibitors.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen BRCA1 VCEP v1.2. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 2
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 2
BS1Supporting
BS1 · supporting

Met (Supporting): the gnomAD v4.1 group-maximum FAF of 5.137e-05 falls in the supporting range (>0.00002 to <=0.0001).

BP1Strong
BP1 · strong

Met (Strong): residue 834 lies outside every clinically important BRCA1 domain (RING, coiled-coil, BRCT), with SpliceAI max delta 0.001.

Recorded classification: Likely benign

Likely Benign: BP1_Strong (-4 points) plus BS1_Supporting (-1 point) totals -5, within the ENIGMA -6 to -2 Likely Benign range.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
11 / 1,613,830 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 11 / 1,613,830 alleles. Recorded AF 6.81608e-06. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96724e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251028 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 6.53595e-05; MAF= 0.00654%, 2/30600 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.082e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.363 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.363. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
6 reported laboratory submissions

5 Uncertain significance · 1 Benign.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. BRCA1, a tumor suppressor involved in the DNA damage response, is mutated in various cancer types.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
1 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV114744917, n = 1 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen BRCA1 VCEP v1.2, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 5 not met · 11 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP framework governs this case.

Residue 834 is outside all three ENIGMA-defined BRCA1 clinically important functional domains, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact; BP1_Strong is met.

PS1 lacks a qualifying same-amino-acid pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator in the supplied evidence and is not assessed.

PM1 and PP2 are explicitly not applicable under the VCEP framework; PM5 is limited by that framework to PTC logic and is not applicable to this missense variant.

The governing framework is the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 specification.

p.(Gly834Glu) lies outside the BRCA1 functional domains that define the PP3 protein-prediction and BP4 missense pathways.

SpliceAI maximum delta 0.001 meets neither the PP3 splice threshold (>=0.2) nor the mRNA-assay requirement for BP7_Strong (RNA).

No computational predictor was counted more than once across PP3, BP4, and BP7.

Met · 2

BS1 SupportingMet (Supporting): the gnomAD v4.1 group-maximum FAF of 5.137e-05 falls in the supporting range (>0.00002 to <=0.0001). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1_Supporting is met under the ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 population thresholds. The gnomAD v4.1 group-maximum FAF is 5.137e-05, which is above 0.00002 and at or below 0.0001. The gnomAD v2.1 group-maximum FAF is below the supporting interval, but the VCEP rule permits application when the threshold is met in gnomAD v2.1 and/or gnomAD v3.1; the available gnomAD v4.1 value independently falls in the specified supporting range.

Rule
Filter allele frequency (FAF) is above 0.002% (FAF > 0.00002) and less than or equal to 0.01% (FAF <= 0.0001) in gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only subset) and/or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer), non-founder population(s).
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 specification v1.2 defines BS1_Supporting as FAF >0.00002 and <=0.0001 in gnomAD v2.1 and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer, non-founder populations.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports group-maximum FAF 5.137e-05 and highest observed South Asian AF 9.88121e-05, placing the group-maximum FAF within the ENIGMA BS1_Supporting interval.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports group-maximum FAF 1.082e-05, total AF 7.96724e-06, and zero homozygotes; this does not independently reach the BS1_Supporting lower threshold.
Still missing
  • The case bundle provides gnomAD v4.1 rather than the VCEP-named gnomAD v3.1 dataset; confirm dataset-version equivalence if strict version matching is required.
Sources
BP1 StrongMet (Strong): residue 834 lies outside every clinically important BRCA1 domain (RING, coiled-coil, BRCT), with SpliceAI max delta 0.001. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution at residue 834. The ENIGMA BRCA1 functional-domain list defines the clinically important domains as RING residues 2-101, coiled-coil residues 1391-1424, and BRCT residues 1650-1857; residue 834 lies outside all three. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (maximum delta 0.001, ≤0.1). The BRCA1-specific BP1 rule therefore supports BP1_Strong.

Rule
Apply BP1_Strong for a missense or in-frame insertion, deletion, or delins variant outside a potentially clinically important functional domain and with no predicted splicing impact (SpliceAI ≤0.1). BRCA1 domains are RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT repeats aa 1650-1857.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 defines BP1_Strong for missense or in-frame variants outside a clinically important functional domain when no splicing is predicted (SpliceAI ≤0.1).
  • The same specification defines BRCA1 clinically important functional domains as RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT repeats aa 1650-1857; p.Gly834 is outside every listed domain.
  • The case variant is NP_009225.1:p.(Gly834Glu), and SpliceAI reports max_delta_score 0.001, satisfying the no-significant-splice-impact condition.
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PVS1 Not met: p.(Gly834Glu) is a missense change with no predicted premature termination or nonsense-mediated decay, and SpliceAI max delta is only 0.001. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BRCA1 c.2501G>A (NM_007294.4) is a missense substitution, p.(Gly834Glu), not a nonsense, frameshift, initiation-codon, canonical splice-site, or exon-deletion variant. The ENIGMA PVS1 specification permits application to null variants, or to damaging mRNA-only functional evidence. SpliceAI shows no significant splice effect (maximum delta 0.001), and no variant-specific damaging mRNA assay is available in the evidence bundle. Therefore there is no predicted premature termination, NMD-triggering transcript, or RNA-based loss-of-function evidence to support PVS1.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2 PVS1: null variant in a gene with loss of function as a known disease mechanism, weighted by the PVS1 flowchart; alternatively, well-established damaging mRNA-only functional evidence may support PVS1(RNA).
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2 PVS1 rule applies to null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical donor/acceptor ±1/2, initiation codon, or exon deletion) with strength determined by its PVS1 flowchart; it also permits PVS1(RNA) only for well-established damaging mRNA-only functional evidence.
  • The case annotation identifies NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A as NP_009225.1:p.(Gly834Glu), a single amino-acid substitution rather than a protein-truncating variant.
  • SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.001 (DS_DG and DS_DL 0.001; all other delta scores 0), reported as no significant splice impact. No mRNA assay demonstrating a damaging transcript consequence is supplied.
  • The exact-variant reports in PMID:26306726 and PMID:32438681 each identify c.2501G>A/p.G834E as a missense variant; neither supplies a variant-specific mRNA assay or a truncating consequence.
Sources
PM2 Not met: the variant is present in population databases (2 alleles in gnomAD v2.1, 11 in gnomAD v4.1) rather than absent from controls. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is not met because the variant is observed in the population databases used by the ENIGMA framework. It has 2 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 and 11 alleles in gnomAD v4.1, rather than being absent from controls. Both datasets report zero homozygotes; absence of homozygotes does not satisfy the VCEP PM2 absence requirement.

Rule
Absent from controls in an outbred population, from gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only subset) and gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer). Region around the variant must have an average read depth >=25.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 specification v1.2 defines PM2_Supporting as absence from controls in an outbred population in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome-only and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer data, with average local read depth at least 25.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 2/251028 alleles and zero homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 11/1613830 alleles and zero homozygotes. Because the allele is present, the absence-from-controls requirement for PM2 is not satisfied; the bundle does not provide a PM2-qualifying depth measure that could override this presence.
Sources
PP3 Not met: residue 834 lies outside the clinically important RING, coiled-coil, and BRCT domains, and SpliceAI max delta 0.001 is below the 0.2 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BRCA1 c.2501G>A encodes p.(Gly834Glu), a missense variant outside the ENIGMA-defined clinically important domains (RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, BRCT aa 1650-1857). ENIGMA PP3 for protein impact is limited to missense/in-frame variants within those domains; its splice pathway requires SpliceAI >=0.2. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.001, so the splice pathway is also not met.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 PP3: domain-limited missense/in-frame protein-impact path; splice path requires SpliceAI >=0.2.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 applies PP3 protein-prediction evidence only to missense/in-frame variants in BRCA1 RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, or BRCT aa 1650-1857; p.Gly834Glu is outside these intervals.
  • The ENIGMA PP3 splice pathway requires SpliceAI >=0.2. The case SpliceAI result has maximum delta 0.001 (DS_DG and DS_DL 0.001; DS_AG and DS_AL 0.0).
Sources
cspec ↗spliceai ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
BA1 Not met: the maximum group allele frequency of 5.137e-05 (gnomAD v4.1) is far below the required >0.001. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 rule requires FAF >0.001 in gnomAD v2.1 and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer, non-founder populations. The observed maximum group FAF in the available population data is 5.137e-05 in gnomAD v4.1, well below 0.001.

Rule
Filter allele frequency (FAF) is above 0.1% (FAF > 0.001) in gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only subset) and/or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer), non-founder population(s).
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 specification v1.2 defines BA1 as FAF >0.001 in gnomAD v2.1 and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer, non-founder populations.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 2/251028 alleles, total AF 7.96724e-06, zero homozygotes, and group-maximum FAF 1.082e-05.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 11/1613830 alleles, total AF 6.81608e-06, zero homozygotes, and group-maximum FAF 5.137e-05; the highest subpopulation AF is South Asian 9.88121e-05. These frequencies are below the BA1 threshold.
Sources
BP4 Not met: despite SpliceAI max delta 0.001, the BP4 missense pathway requires location within a clinically important domain, and residue 834 is outside them. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Although SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.001 (<=0.1), the ENIGMA BP4 missense pathway is limited to missense/in-frame variants inside a clinically important domain and requires both no predicted protein impact and no predicted splice impact. p.(Gly834Glu) is outside the RING, coiled-coil, and BRCT domains, so it does not meet the BP4 pathway. The benign low-prior pathway for this location is not BP4.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 BP4: missense/in-frame variants within a clinically important domain, with no predicted protein impact and SpliceAI <=0.1.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 restricts BP4 for missense/in-frame variants to clinically important functional domains and requires no predicted protein impact plus SpliceAI <=0.1.
  • p.Gly834 is outside the VCEP-defined BRCA1 RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT aa 1650-1857 domains.
  • The case SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.001, satisfying the no-predicted-splice-impact component but not overcoming the BP4 domain-scope requirement.
Sources
cspec ↗spliceai ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18

Not assessed · 11 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator with the same amino-acid change (p.Gly834Glu) was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, p.Gly834Glu, and the ENIGMA BRCA1 specification permits PS1 when a previously classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant has the same protein change or qualifying matched splicing impact. The supplied evidence does not identify a pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator with the same amino-acid change, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (maximum delta 0.001).

Rule
Apply PS1 for a predicted missense substitution when a previously classified pathogenic variant is considered to act via protein change and there is no confirmed or predicted effect on mRNA splicing (SpliceAI ≤0.1). Apply PS1_Moderate when the reference variant is previously classified likely pathogenic; qualifying splicing matches may be weighted by relative position and reference-variant confidence.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 defines PS1 for a missense substitution when a previously classified pathogenic variant acts through protein change, with no confirmed or predicted splice effect; PS1_Moderate is described for a previously classified likely pathogenic comparator.
  • The case variant is NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A, NP_009225.1:p.(Gly834Glu), and SpliceAI reports a maximum delta score of 0.001, below the specification's 0.1 splice-impact threshold.
  • No same-amino-acid pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator is present in the supplied PM5 candidate collection or paper-extract evidence.
Still missing
  • No qualifying previously classified pathogenic comparator with the same amino-acid change was identified in the supplied evidence bundle.
  • No variant-specific evidence establishing a qualifying matched splicing impact was identified.
Sources
PS3 Not assessed: no calibrated functional assay result for p.(Gly834Glu) meeting the specification's Table 9 requirement was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP specification (version 1.2) requires well-established, biologically relevant functional studies with calibrated assay interpretation for PS3 and directs review to Specifications Table 9. No Table 9 entry for NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu/p.G834E) was identified in the case bundle, and the summarized ST4 functional dataset contains other variants but not this variant. The variant-specific publications located in the bundle report detection in clinical cohorts but provide no functional assay result. Therefore, damaging functional evidence is insufficient to assess PS3.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 PS3: well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect; apply PS3 for assays measuring protein effect alone or mRNA and protein combined, using calibrated published assay recommendations in Specifications Table 9.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 states that PS3 is supported by well-established in vitro or in vivo studies showing a damaging effect, with protein-only or combined mRNA/protein assays evaluated using calibrated published assays in Specifications Table 9.
  • The case-bundle summary of ENIGMA Specifications Table 9 does not list c.2501G>A, and its summarized ST4 functional assay results list c.285T>G and c.5247A>C rather than the target variant.
  • PMID:26306726 reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A/p.G834E as a variant identified by next-generation sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing, but does not report a functional assay result for it.
  • PMID:32438681 reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A/p.(Gly834Glu) once in a clinical cohort and assigns it Class 3 (uncertain significance), but reports no variant-specific functional assay, segregation result, or other functional measurement.
Still missing
  • No variant-specific calibrated protein-function or combined mRNA/protein assay result was identified.
  • No assay controls, replicate data, biological-relevance validation, or ENIGMA Table 9 PS3 strength assignment was identified for this variant.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18PMID:26306726 ↗PMID:32438681 ↗
PS4 Not assessed: the two cohort observations provide no matched case-control comparison meeting the required p<=0.05 and OR>=4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification requires a case-control study with p<=0.05, OR>=4, and lower confidence interval excluding 2.0. Two exact-variant reports identify c.2501G>A/p.(Gly834Glu) once each in ovarian cancer and breast/ovarian cancer cohorts, but neither provides a matched control comparison or a qualifying case-control statistic.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PS4: case-control study p<=0.05 and OR>=4 with lower confidence interval excluding 2.0; do not use proband counting.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA specifies PS4 only for case-control evidence with p<=0.05, OR>=4, and lower confidence interval excluding 2.0; proband counting is not used.
  • PMID:26306726 reports c.2501G>A/p.G834E in one of 212 ovarian cancer samples, without variant-specific control data or a case-control association statistic.
  • PMID:32438681 reports c.2501G>A/p.(Gly834Glu) once in a retrospective cohort of 2351 breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, without variant-specific control data or a case-control association statistic.
Still missing
  • Ethnicity- and country-matched case and control counts for c.2501G>A.
  • A qualifying case-control OR, confidence interval, and p-value.
Sources
PM3 Not assessed: no Fanconi anemia phenotype or co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant in the same gene was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification limits PM3 to a patient with a phenotype consistent with BRCA1/2-related Fanconi anemia and co-occurring pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the same gene, with strength assigned from the Table 6 point system. The available case bundle documents the target variant in cancer cohorts but provides no Fanconi anemia phenotype, affected-proband evidence meeting the specification, second BRCA1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, or parental/offspring testing establishing trans or cis phase. PM3 therefore cannot be assigned from the available evidence.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PM3: apply for a patient with phenotype consistent with BRCA1- or BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia and co-occurring variants in the same gene; assign strength using the Table 6 point system (PM3 Supporting = 1 point, PM3 = 2 points, PM3 Strong = at least 4 points).
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 specifies PM3 for a patient with a phenotype consistent with BRCA1/2-related Fanconi anemia and co-occurring variants in the same gene; PM3 strength is based on the Table 6 point system.
  • PMID:26306726 reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A (p.G834E) in one ovarian-cancer patient identified by NGS and confirmed by Sanger sequencing, but reports no co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant or phase information.
  • PMID:32438681 reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu) once in a breast/ovarian cancer cohort and provides no variant-specific segregation, co-occurrence, or phase result.
  • The case bundle contains no documented Fanconi anemia phenotype or chromosome-breakage result for the case.
  • The case bundle provides no parental or offspring testing establishing cis/trans phase with another BRCA1 variant.
Still missing
  • Documented BRCA1/2-related Fanconi anemia phenotype, including chromosome-breakage testing and qualifying clinical features
  • A co-occurring pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 variant classified under the ENIGMA specification
  • Phasing information demonstrating the two variants are in trans
Sources
PP1 Not assessed: no affected-relative genotypes or quantitative co-segregation data were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP1 requires co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members assessed by a quantitative co-segregation method. The case bundle provides no affected-relative genotypes, phenotype-linked pedigree, meioses, segregation likelihood ratio, or other quantitative co-segregation result.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2: apply PP1 only for co-segregation in multiple affected family members using a quantitative co-segregation method; Supporting LR >=2.08:1, Moderate LR >=4.3:1, Strong LR >=18.7:1, Very Strong LR >=350:1.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA v1.2 requires quantitative co-segregation analysis for PP1; its thresholds are Supporting LR >=2.08:1, Moderate LR >=4.3:1, Strong LR >=18.7:1, and Very Strong LR >=350:1.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family segregation observations or quantitative co-segregation analysis for NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu).
Still missing
  • Affected-relative genotypes and phenotypes are not reported.
  • Number of informative meioses and family structure are not reported.
  • No quantitative co-segregation likelihood ratio or Bayes score is available, so no PP1 strength can be assigned.
Sources
PP4 Not assessed: no combined, clinically calibrated multifactorial likelihood ratio for this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

For BRCA1-related cancer predisposition, ENIGMA restricts PP4 to a combined, clinically calibrated multifactorial likelihood ratio. No combined LR is supplied for c.2501G>A. The two cohort observations cannot substitute for that combined LR.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 PP4: apply only a combined clinically calibrated multifactorial LR; Supporting >=2.08, Moderate >=4.3, Strong >=18.7, Very Strong >=350.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA permits PP4 only for a combined multifactorial clinical LR; thresholds are Supporting >=2.08, Moderate >=4.3, Strong >=18.7, and Very Strong >=350.
  • The VCEP clinical-history LR resource is an allowable component for PP4/BP5 but does not provide a reported c.2501G>A LR in the supplied evidence bundle.
  • The exact-variant cohort reports in PMID:26306726 and PMID:32438681 provide isolated observations, not a combined multifactorial LR.
Still missing
  • Variant-specific combined multifactorial clinical LR, with reviewable component data and weights.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lrPMID:26306726 ↗PMID:32438681 ↗
BS2 Not assessed: no homozygous or compound-heterozygous case observations or Fanconi anemia phenotype data were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 cannot be assessed from the available bundle. The ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 rule applies BS2 in the absence of Fanconi Anemia features and requires aggregation of qualifying proband points; no case-level homozygous or compound-heterozygous observations, Fanconi Anemia phenotype assessments, or BS2 point assignments are provided.

Rule
Applied in absence of features of recessive disease, namely Fanconi Anemia phenotype. See Specifications Table 8 for additional stipulations, and approach to assign points per proband, and final BS2 code assignment based on the sum of BS2-related points.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 specification v1.2 defines BS2 as evidence applied in the absence of Fanconi Anemia features and assigns strength by the summed BS2 points: Supporting = 1 point, Moderate = 2 points, and Strong = at least 4 points.
  • The population data show zero homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, but this alone does not provide the required qualifying proband observations or establish the ENIGMA BS2 point total.
Still missing
  • Case-level evidence is needed for qualifying homozygous or compound-heterozygous observations and the associated absence of Fanconi Anemia features, including the ENIGMA BS2 point count.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no calibrated functional assay demonstrating absence of damaging effect was available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP specification (version 1.2) requires well-established, biologically relevant functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect, with calibrated assay interpretation in Specifications Table 9. No Table 9 entry for NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu/p.G834E) was identified in the case bundle, and the summarized ST4 functional dataset does not contain this variant. The variant-specific publications located report clinical detection only and provide no benign functional assay result. Therefore, benign functional evidence is insufficient to assess BS3.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 BS3: well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function; apply BS3 for assays measuring protein effect alone or mRNA and protein combined, using calibrated published assay recommendations in Specifications Table 9.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 states that BS3 requires well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function, with protein-only or combined mRNA/protein assays evaluated using calibrated published assays in Specifications Table 9.
  • The case-bundle summary of ENIGMA Specifications Table 9 does not list c.2501G>A, and its summarized ST4 functional assay results list c.285T>G and c.5247A>C rather than the target variant.
  • PMID:26306726 reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A/p.G834E as a clinically detected variant but provides no functional assay evidence supporting retained protein function.
  • PMID:32438681 reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A/p.(Gly834Glu) once and classifies it as Class 3, but provides no variant-specific functional assay or benign functional result.
Still missing
  • No variant-specific calibrated protein-function or combined mRNA/protein assay result demonstrating retained function was identified.
  • No assay controls, replicate data, biological-relevance validation, or ENIGMA Table 9 BS3 strength assignment was identified for this variant.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18PMID:26306726 ↗PMID:32438681 ↗
BS4 Not assessed: no affected-relative genotypes or quantitative non-segregation data were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS4 requires lack of segregation in affected family members assessed by a quantitative co-segregation method. The case bundle provides no affected-relative genotypes, non-segregation observations, meioses, or segregation likelihood ratio; therefore BS4 cannot be assigned.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2: apply BS4 only for lack of segregation in affected family members using a quantitative co-segregation method; Supporting LR <=0.48:1, Moderate LR <=0.23:1, Strong LR <=0.05:1, Very Strong LR <=0.00285:1.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA v1.2 requires quantitative co-segregation analysis for BS4; its thresholds are Supporting LR <=0.48:1, Moderate LR <=0.23:1, Strong LR <=0.05:1, and Very Strong LR <=0.00285:1.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family non-segregation observations or quantitative co-segregation analysis for NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu).
Still missing
  • Affected-relative genotypes and phenotypes are not reported.
  • No non-segregation events or informative meioses are reported.
  • No quantitative co-segregation likelihood ratio or Bayes score is available, so no BS4 strength can be assigned.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no combined, clinically calibrated multifactorial likelihood ratio against pathogenicity was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

For BRCA1-related cancer predisposition, ENIGMA restricts BP5 to a combined, clinically calibrated multifactorial LR against pathogenicity and specifically excludes co-observation in another breast/ovarian cancer risk gene as a BP5 basis. No qualifying combined LR or other eligible BP5 evidence is supplied.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP5: apply only a combined clinically calibrated multifactorial LR against pathogenicity; Supporting <=0.48, Moderate <=0.23, Strong <=0.05, Very Strong <=0.00285.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA permits BP5 only for a combined multifactorial clinical LR against pathogenicity; thresholds are Supporting <=0.48, Moderate <=0.23, Strong <=0.05, and Very Strong <=0.00285.
  • The supplied VCEP clinical-history LR resource is an allowable PP4/BP5 component, but the bundle supplies no c.2501G>A LR and no combined multifactorial LR.
Still missing
  • Variant-specific combined multifactorial clinical LR <=0.48 with reviewable component data and weights.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
BP7 Not assessed: no variant-specific mRNA assay was available for BP7_Strong (RNA), and the routine BP7 pathway applies only to silent variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The routine ENIGMA BP7 pathway is for silent variants meeting BP4 or suitably deep intronic variants meeting BP4 and therefore does not apply to this missense change. ENIGMA additionally permits BP7_Strong (RNA) for a missense variant outside a clinically important domain when a well-established mRNA assay shows no damaging transcript effect. p.(Gly834Glu) is outside those domains, but no variant-specific mRNA assay demonstrating an unaffected transcript profile was retrieved; SpliceAI alone cannot establish BP7_Strong (RNA).

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 BP7 and BP7_Strong (RNA).
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 applies routine BP7 to silent variants meeting BP4 or intronic variants at or beyond +7/-21 meeting BP4.
  • The VCEP repurposes BP7_Strong (RNA) for intronic, silent, and missense/in-frame variants outside a clinically important functional domain only when well-established mRNA evidence shows no damaging transcript effect.
  • No retrieved variant-specific mRNA assay result establishes an unaffected transcript profile for c.2501G>A; computational SpliceAI is not a substitute for this RNA-evidence pathway.
Still missing
  • No well-established, variant-specific mRNA splicing assay showing an unaffected transcript profile for BRCA1 c.2501G>A was present in the case evidence bundle or the extracted full-text findings.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
Not applicable · 10· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS2 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification does not use PS2, and no de novo or parental-testing evidence was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 marks PS2 as not applicable. No de novo or parental-testing evidence is provided in the case bundle.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2: PS2 is Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Expert Panel specification v1.2 as the governing framework and records PS2 applicability as Not Applicable.
  • The case evidence contains no proband-specific parental testing, maternity/paternity confirmation, or de novo observation suitable for PS2.
Still missing
  • No de novo parental testing data are available, although PS2 is specified as not applicable for BRCA1 by ENIGMA v1.2.
Sources
PM1 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification does not apply PM1, and no authoritative domain-table entry applies to this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification explicitly marks PM1 as not applicable. The supplied vcep_materials.json has an empty domain_tables object, so there is no authoritative domain-table entry overriding that framework applicability decision.

Evidence considered
  • The governing ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 lists PM1 as Not Applicable in the case-specific framework.
  • The case vcep_materials.json domain_tables key is present but contains no BRCA1 entry.
Sources
PM4 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification does not use PM4, and this missense change produces no protein-length alteration. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 is designated Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2 specification. Independently, this is a missense substitution with no stop-loss or in-frame length-changing consequence, so it does not produce a protein-length change for PM4 evaluation.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2: PM4 is Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2 CSPEC marks PM4 as Not Applicable.
  • ClinVar identifies the submitted variant as NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu), a missense substitution rather than an in-frame insertion/deletion or stop-loss event.
Sources
PM5 N/ANot applicable: the ENIGMA PM5 rule applies only to protein-termination-codon variants, and p.(Gly834Glu) is a missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Under the governing ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification, PM5 is repurposed for protein-termination-codon variants in an exon where a different proven pathogenic PTC variant has been observed. This variant is missense, p.Gly834Glu, not a PTC variant; therefore the VCEP-specific PM5 rule does not apply. No classic same-residue missense PM5 assessment is substituted for the applicable VCEP rule.

Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 defines PM5 only for PTC variants as additional weight for PVS1, with exon-specific PM5_PTC strengths.
  • The variant consequence is missense, NP_009225.1:p.(Gly834Glu), and the supplied PM5 candidate assessment records classic missense PM5 as ineligible and the VCEP PM5 mode as ptc_gene_specific.
Sources
cspec ↗pm5_candidates
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification does not use PM6, and no unconfirmed de novo evidence was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 marks PM6 as not applicable. No unconfirmed de novo evidence is provided in the case bundle.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2: PM6 is Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • The case bundle identifies the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Expert Panel specification v1.2 as the governing framework and records PM6 applicability as Not Applicable.
  • The case evidence contains no proband-specific parental testing or other unconfirmed de novo observation suitable for PM6.
Still missing
  • No unconfirmed de novo parental testing data are available, although PM6 is specified as not applicable for BRCA1 by ENIGMA v1.2.
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification provides its own rule in place of PP2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification explicitly marks PP2 as not applicable. Generic PP2 is not used when an applicable gene-specific VCEP framework provides a different rule.

Evidence considered
  • The governing ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification v1.2 lists PP2 as Not Applicable.
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification does not use PP5, and ClinVar has no expert-panel submission for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 is not applicable under the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 specification. Independently, ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel submission; its listed assertions are single-submitter records and therefore do not meet the requested expert-panel-only condition.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2: PP5 is not applicable; additionally, this review permits PP5 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic classification.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA v1.2 marks PP5 as not applicable.
  • The exact ClinVar record is NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu); its submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions.
Sources
BP2 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification applies BP2 only in the context of BS2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The applicable ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 specification marks BP2 as not applicable and states that it is applied only in the context of BS2. No BP2 evidence should be assigned for this BRCA1 variant.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 BP2: not applicable; applied only in the context of BS2.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 marks BP2 as not applicable at all strengths and states that it is applied only in the context of BS2.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification does not use BP3, and this missense change is not an in-frame indel. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 is designated Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2 specification. This missense substitution is not an in-frame insertion/deletion, and no repeat-region context can make BP3 applicable under this gene-specific framework.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2: BP3 is Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 v1.2 CSPEC marks BP3 as Not Applicable.
  • ClinVar identifies c.2501G>A as p.Gly834Glu, a missense substitution rather than an in-frame insertion or deletion.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification does not use BP6, and ClinVar's benign assertion is a single-submitter record, not an expert-panel one. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 is not applicable under the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2 specification. Independently, ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel submission; the benign assertion is a single-submitter record and cannot trigger BP6.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 v1.2: BP6 is not applicable; additionally, this review permits BP6 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign/Likely benign classification.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA v1.2 marks BP6 as not applicable.
  • The exact ClinVar record is NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2501G>A (p.Gly834Glu); its submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions, while the benign assertion is single-submitter.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_007294.4:c.2501G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_009225.1:p.(Gly834Glu)
GRCh38
chr17:43093030 C>T
GRCh37
chr17:41245047 C>T
Location and type
Exon 10 · missense
ClinVar
3634661, 462587, 441383
COSMIC
COSV114744917

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in BRCA1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_007294.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

BRCA1NM_007294.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 11 / 1,613,830 alleles AF 6.82e-06 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 5.14e-05
gnomAD v2.1 2 / 251,028 alleles AF 7.97e-06 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 1.08e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 6.8e-06 · 11 / 1,613,830 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 5.1e-05
South Asian9 / 91,082 9.9e-05
Remaining individuals1 / 62,482 1.6e-05
European (non-Finnish)1 / 1,179,986 8.5e-07
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 8e-06 · 2 / 251,028 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 1.1e-05
South Asian2 / 30,600 6.5e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.81608e-06; MAF= 0.00068%, 11/1613830 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 9.88121e-05; MAF= 0.00988%, 9/91082 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 5.137e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96724e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251028 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 6.53595e-05; MAF= 0.00654%, 2/30600 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.082e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -126 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +39 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat +490 bp
0.001
SpliceAI donor gainat -479 bp
0.001
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.001
Pangolin splice gain
0.007

Other predictors

REVEL
0.363
BayesDel
-0.179

How the predictions were used

PP3 Not met: residue 834 lies outside the clinically important RING, coiled-coil, and BRCT domains, and SpliceAI max delta 0.001 is below the 0.2 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BRCA1 c.2501G>A encodes p.(Gly834Glu), a missense variant outside the ENIGMA-defined clinically important domains (RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, BRCT aa 1650-1857). ENIGMA PP3 for protein impact is limited to missense/in-frame variants within those domains; its splice pathway requires SpliceAI >=0.2. SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.001, so the splice pathway is also not met.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 PP3: domain-limited missense/in-frame protein-impact path; splice path requires SpliceAI >=0.2.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 applies PP3 protein-prediction evidence only to missense/in-frame variants in BRCA1 RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, or BRCT aa 1650-1857; p.Gly834Glu is outside these intervals.
  • The ENIGMA PP3 splice pathway requires SpliceAI >=0.2. The case SpliceAI result has maximum delta 0.001 (DS_DG and DS_DL 0.001; DS_AG and DS_AL 0.0).
Sources
cspec ↗spliceai ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
BP4 Not met: despite SpliceAI max delta 0.001, the BP4 missense pathway requires location within a clinically important domain, and residue 834 is outside them. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Although SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.001 (<=0.1), the ENIGMA BP4 missense pathway is limited to missense/in-frame variants inside a clinically important domain and requires both no predicted protein impact and no predicted splice impact. p.(Gly834Glu) is outside the RING, coiled-coil, and BRCT domains, so it does not meet the BP4 pathway. The benign low-prior pathway for this location is not BP4.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 BP4: missense/in-frame variants within a clinically important domain, with no predicted protein impact and SpliceAI <=0.1.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 restricts BP4 for missense/in-frame variants to clinically important functional domains and requires no predicted protein impact plus SpliceAI <=0.1.
  • p.Gly834 is outside the VCEP-defined BRCA1 RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT aa 1650-1857 domains.
  • The case SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.001, satisfying the no-predicted-splice-impact component but not overcoming the BP4 domain-scope requirement.
Sources
cspec ↗spliceai ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
BP7 Not assessed: no variant-specific mRNA assay was available for BP7_Strong (RNA), and the routine BP7 pathway applies only to silent variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The routine ENIGMA BP7 pathway is for silent variants meeting BP4 or suitably deep intronic variants meeting BP4 and therefore does not apply to this missense change. ENIGMA additionally permits BP7_Strong (RNA) for a missense variant outside a clinically important domain when a well-established mRNA assay shows no damaging transcript effect. p.(Gly834Glu) is outside those domains, but no variant-specific mRNA assay demonstrating an unaffected transcript profile was retrieved; SpliceAI alone cannot establish BP7_Strong (RNA).

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 BP7 and BP7_Strong (RNA).
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP v1.2 applies routine BP7 to silent variants meeting BP4 or intronic variants at or beyond +7/-21 meeting BP4.
  • The VCEP repurposes BP7_Strong (RNA) for intronic, silent, and missense/in-frame variants outside a clinically important functional domain only when well-established mRNA evidence shows no damaging transcript effect.
  • No retrieved variant-specific mRNA assay result establishes an unaffected transcript profile for c.2501G>A; computational SpliceAI is not a substitute for this RNA-evidence pathway.
Still missing
  • No well-established, variant-specific mRNA splicing assay showing an unaffected transcript profile for BRCA1 c.2501G>A was present in the case evidence bundle or the extracted full-text findings.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.363. BayesDel score = -0.178754.

8 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Recorded publications

  • Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 23918944 ↗
  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Clinical impact on ovarian cancer patients of massive parallel sequencing for BRCA mutation detection: the experience at Gemelli hospital and a literature review.
    Minucci A et al. · 2015
    The paper explicitly reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A, corresponding to p.G834E, in one patient. The variant was identified by next-generation sequencing in exon 11 and confirmed by targeted Sanger sequencing. The authors listed it among their variants of uncertain significance because it was described as a novel variant; it provides no variant-specific mRNA assay or truncating consequence.
    Names this variant
    PMID 26306726 ↗
    Quoted passage
    1 BRCA1 11 c.2501G > A 2620G > A p.G834E – – – – – Novel

    Table 7, Results section ('Variants of uncertain significance')

  • Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".
    Dines JN et al. · 2020
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 31911673 ↗
  • Spectrum of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants Identified in 2351 Ovarian and Breast Cancer Patients Referring to a Reference Cancer Hospital of Rome.
    Santonocito C et al. · 2020
    The paper explicitly reports BRCA1 c.2501G>A, encoding p.(Gly834Glu), in one individual and lists it as a missense variant. It provides no variant-specific functional assay, segregation result, mRNA study, or additional consequence evidence relevant to loss of function.
    Names this variant
    PMID 32438681 ↗
    Quoted passage
    11 c.2501G>A p.(Gly834Glu) rs757383244 1 M 3

    Table 2, BRCA1 Gene Variants, exon 11

  • American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.
    Saslow D et al. · 2007
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 17392385 ↗
  • Summaries for patients. Assessing the genetic risk for BRCA-related breast or ovarian cancer in women: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24366402 ↗
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Expert Statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24493721 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.81608e-06; MAF= 0.00068%, 11/1613830 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 9.88121e-05; MAF= 0.00988%, 9/91082 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 5.137e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96724e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251028 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 6.53595e-05; MAF= 0.00654%, 2/30600 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.082e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (5 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 462587)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.363. BayesDel score = -0.178754.

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. BRCA1, a tumor suppressor involved in the DNA damage response, is mutated in various cancer types.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV114744917, n = 1 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.