0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

BRCA1 c.3270A>G, p.(Gln1090=)

NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=) Synonymous · exon 10 View identifiers
Classification
Likely benign

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely benign. Select a step to read what it means.

Likely benign.A likely benign classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About BRCA1

BRCA1 encodes a large nuclear protein that helps maintain genomic stability by coordinating the repair of DNA double-strand breaks through homologous recombination, and it also regulates transcription and the cell cycle. It acts as a tumor suppressor, working with proteins such as RAD51, BRCA2, BARD1, and PALB2 to preserve genome integrity. Inherited alterations in BRCA1 cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, with elevated risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers, and biallelic loss underlies a rare form of Fanconi anemia. Because BRCA1-driven tumors rely on impaired DNA repair, they are treatable with PARP inhibitors.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen BRCA1 VCEP v1.2. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 2
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 2
BP1Strong
BP1 · strong

Met, strong: synonymous Q1090 is outside ENIGMA BRCA1 domains and SpliceAI max delta 0.002 is below the <=0.1 BP1 threshold.

BP6Supporting
BP6 · supporting

Met, Supporting: exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification is Likely benign for variation 187419.

Recorded classification: Likely benign

Likely Benign: BP1 Strong plus BP6 Supporting benign satisfy the ENIGMA BRCA1 Table 3 combination rule.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
23 / 1,613,676 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 23 / 1,613,676 alleles. Recorded AF 1.42532e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.06387e-05; MAF= 0.00106%, 3/281990 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 2.33376e-05; MAF= 0.00233%, 3/128548 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.94e-06.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.002 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.002. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
7 reported laboratory submissions

6 Likely benign · 1 Likely Benign. ClinVar API review status: reviewed by expert panel.

Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen BRCA1 VCEP v1.2, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 5 not met · 9 not assessed · 12 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

All three requested consequence/LOF criteria are not applicable under the ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 framework because the variant is synonymous and protein-preserving: NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=).

The observed SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, below the ENIGMA threshold of 0.2 for predicted splicing in silent variants, but this group does not adjudicate BP4 or BP7.

For the requested codon/residue/domain criteria, ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 yields BP1_Strong only; PS1, PM1, PM5, and PP2 are not applicable under the governing specification.

The variant is NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, encoding the synonymous change p.(Gln1090=); Q1090 is outside all specified BRCA1 potentially clinically important functional domains, and SpliceAI max delta is 0.002.

The exact variant is a synonymous BRCA1 change, NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=/p.Q1090=).

Exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel evidence supports BP6 but not PP5 because the classification is Likely benign.

PS4, PP4, and BP5 remain not assessed because the required exact-variant case-control or multifactorial LR data were not available.

The variant is synonymous (p.Gln1090=). PP3 is not met because SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, below the ENIGMA >=0.2 splice-impact threshold.

BP4 is not applicable under the requested scope for synonymous variants. BP7 is not applicable because residue 1090 is outside the ENIGMA-defined BRCA1 functional domains and the specified BP7 condition requires BP4.

Met · 2

BP1 StrongMet, strong: synonymous Q1090 is outside ENIGMA BRCA1 domains and SpliceAI max delta 0.002 is below the <=0.1 BP1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification applies BP1_Strong to silent substitutions outside a potentially clinically important functional domain when no splicing is predicted, defined as SpliceAI <=0.1. The variant is synonymous at residue Q1090, outside the specified RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT repeats aa 1650-1857, and its SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.002; all governing conditions are met.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 BP1_Strong: silent substitution outside a potentially clinically important functional domain AND no predicted splicing (SpliceAI <=0.1).
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BP1_Strong rule: apply to silent substitutions outside a potentially clinically important functional domain with SpliceAI <=0.1.
  • Q1090 is outside the ENIGMA BRCA1 domains RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT repeats aa 1650-1857.
  • The case SpliceAI result is max delta 0.002, satisfying the governing <=0.1 threshold.
  • The exact variant is reported in Judkins et al. as Q1090Q and labeled P (benign polymorphism), in a 55,630-patient BRCA1 sequencing dataset; this is concordant context but is not required for the ENIGMA BP1 rule.
Sources
BP6 SupportingMet, Supporting: exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification is Likely benign for variation 187419. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Expert panel Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) classified as Likely benign.

Rule
Apply BP6 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Benign or Likely benign; assign Supporting strength.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 187419 exactly matches NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=) and is classified Likely benign with review status reviewed by expert panel.
  • The exact protein synonym p.Q1090= is confirmed by the normalized variant record, establishing identity with p.Gln1090=.
  • ClinVar expert panel classification
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM2 Not met: the variant is present with 2 alleles in both governing non-cancer datasets, rather than absent as required for PM2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP defines PM2 Supporting as absence from controls in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, with adequate local read depth. This variant is present in both specified non-cancer datasets, with 2 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and 2 alleles in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes. Because it is not absent from the governing control datasets, PM2 is not met.

Rule
Absent from controls in an outbred population, from gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome-only subset and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes; average regional read depth must be >=25.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP specification v1.2 requires absence from gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes for PM2 Supporting.
  • The case evidence reports gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes AC 2 of 236062 and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes AC 2 of 147892, with zero homozygotes; presence in either governing dataset prevents PM2.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt; the governing rule was therefore used.
Sources
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.002 is below the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of >=0.2 for predicted splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is synonymous (NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G; p.Gln1090=), so PP3 is considered only through the ENIGMA splice-prediction path. The governing ENIGMA BRCA1 specification applies PP3 for predicted splicing at SpliceAI max delta >=0.2. SpliceAI is available and reports DS_AG 0.002, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, and DS_DL 0.0, with maximum delta 0.002; therefore the threshold is not reached and PP3 is not met. No exact variant-level entry was found when searching SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2: PP3 for predicted splicing in silent variants requires SpliceAI >=0.2.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2 state that PP3 applies to predicted splicing for silent variants when SpliceAI is >=0.2.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG 0.002, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, and DS_DL 0.0 for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G; the maximum delta is 0.002.
  • The variant is synonymous, annotated as NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=) / p.(Q1090=).
  • The four declared VCEP full-text files were searched for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, and p.Q1090=; no exact entry was found in any of them.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
Sources
PP5 Not met: exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification is Likely benign, not Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact ClinVar record for NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=) is ClinVar variation 187419 and has an expert-panel classification of Likely benign. Under the instructed PP5 rule, only an exact-variant expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification supports PP5; this expert-panel classification is benign-direction evidence and therefore does not meet PP5.

Rule
Apply PP5 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 187419 exactly matches NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=) and is classified Likely benign with review status reviewed by expert panel.
  • Ordinary laboratory submissions and aggregate labels were not used to trigger PP5.
Sources
BA1 Not met: maximum non-cancer filter allele frequency was 4.88e-06, below the ENIGMA BA1 threshold of >0.001. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP requires filter allele frequency above 0.001 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer non-founder populations for BA1. The variant's maximum reported filter allele frequency was 3.25e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and 4.88e-06 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, both far below 0.001. Therefore BA1 is not met.

Rule
Filter allele frequency (FAF) is above 0.1% (FAF > 0.001) in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome-only subset and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer non-founder populations.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP specification v1.2 sets BA1 at filter allele frequency >0.001 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer populations.
  • The case evidence reports gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome grpmax FAF 3.25e-06 and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genome grpmax FAF 4.88e-06; neither reaches 0.001.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt; the governing rule was therefore used.
Sources
BS1 Not met: maximum non-cancer filter allele frequency was 4.88e-06, below the ENIGMA BS1 Supporting threshold of >0.00002. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP requires filter allele frequency above 0.0001 for BS1 Strong, or above 0.00002 through 0.0001 for BS1 Supporting, using gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes. The maximum reported filter allele frequency was 4.88e-06, below even the Supporting threshold. Therefore BS1 is not met at any specified strength.

Rule
Filter allele frequency (FAF) is above 0.0001 for BS1 Strong, or above 0.00002 and <=0.0001 for BS1 Supporting, in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and/or gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer non-founder populations.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP specification v1.2 sets BS1 Strong at FAF >0.0001 and BS1 Supporting at FAF >0.00002 to <=0.0001 in the specified non-cancer gnomAD datasets.
  • The case evidence reports maximum filter allele frequencies of 3.25e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and 4.88e-06 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, both below 0.00002.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt; the governing rule was therefore used.
Sources

Not assessed · 9 · no assessment recorded

PS3 Not assessed: no variant-specific calibrated protein or combined mRNA–protein functional assay result was found for c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification reserves PS3 for well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging protein effect, or combined mRNA-and-protein evidence. The governing Specifications Table 9 has no entry for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=. The supplementary functional-assay dataset (ST4) and the Parsons multifactorial supplement also have no exact entry for this variant. Therefore, no calibrated variant-specific damaging assay result is available to apply PS3.

Rule
ENIGMA v1.2 PS3: apply only for well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect measured via protein alone or mRNA and protein combined; use Table 9 calibrated recommendations when present.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 specifies PS3 for well-established in vitro or in vivo studies supportive of a damaging effect measured through protein alone or mRNA and protein together; mRNA-only damaging results are handled under the alternative RNA code rather than PS3.
  • Specifications Table 9 contains no row matching c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=, so no pre-assigned PS3 strength governs this variant.
  • Supplementary Table 4 functional-assay data and HUMU-40-1557-SuppT4 contain no exact entry for this variant; no calibrated assay metric or control comparison is available for PS3.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= in Specifications_Table9_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact variant entry in the functional-assay dataset ST4 of SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact variant entry in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt.
  • No calibrated variant-specific protein or combined mRNA-and-protein assay result was identified; the available variant-specific publication finding is a benign-polymorphism label, not functional assay evidence.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
PS4 Not assessed: no exact-variant case-control odds ratio, p-value, or confidence interval is available to evaluate the ENIGMA PS4 thresholds. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification governs PS4 as strong when a case-control study shows p-value <=0.05 and OR >=4, with the lower confidence interval excluding 2.0. No exact-variant case-control dataset, odds ratio, p-value, or confidence interval was provided for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=/p.Q1090=). The exact variant is absent from Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt; the available literature extraction reports only a general clinical observation of Q1090Q in a BRCA1 haplotype table, not case-control enrichment. Therefore PS4 cannot be assessed.

Rule
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. Case-control studies; p-value <=0.05 and OR >=4 (lower confidence interval excludes 2.0).
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA rule states: "Case-control studies; p-value <=0.05 and OR >=4 (lower confidence interval excludes 2.0)."
  • The exact variant was not found in the searched full-text VCEP specification, and the available exact-variant paper finding reports a haplotype observation rather than case-control enrichment.
Still missing
  • No exact-variant case-control prevalence dataset, OR, p-value, or confidence interval for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
Sources
PM3 Not assessed: no Fanconi-anemia phenotype, co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant, or phase information is documented for c.3270A>G. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP specification restricts PM3 to patients with a phenotype consistent with BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia and a co-occurrent variant in the same gene, with PM3 strength determined from Table 6 points for a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in trans, homozygous state, or unknown phase. The available case evidence provides no affected-proband Fanconi-anemia phenotype, chromosome-breakage result, co-occurring pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 variant, or phase information for c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=; p.Q1090=). PMID:16267036 reports Q1090Q as a benign polymorphism in a haplotype table but does not establish an informative trans observation, phase, or Fanconi-anemia phenotype. Therefore PM3 cannot be assigned from the available evidence.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 PM3_VariableWeight: apply only for a patient with phenotype consistent with BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia and co-occurrent variants in the same gene; PM3 = 2 points, PM3_Supporting = 1 point, and PM3_Strong = 4 or more points.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP Specifications V1.2, Table 1 and Table 6: PM3 is restricted to a BRCA1-related Fanconi-anemia phenotype with a same-gene co-occurrent variant; 2 points are required for PM3, 1 point for PM3_Supporting, and at least 4 points for PM3_Strong.
  • The case evidence contains no affected-proband Fanconi-anemia phenotype, chromosome-breakage result, same-gene pathogenic/likely pathogenic co-occurring variant, or phase assignment for this variant.
  • PMID:16267036 lists Q1090Q, corresponding to p.Q1090=, as a benign polymorphism in Table 2, Haplotype 1, but does not provide an informative trans observation, phase determination, or Fanconi-anemia phenotype for this variant.
  • A direct search of Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, and p.Q1090= found no variant-specific entry.
Still missing
  • No affected-proband Fanconi-anemia phenotype or chromosome-breakage result is available.
  • No co-occurring pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 variant and no trans, cis, homozygous, or unknown-phase observation is documented.
  • No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found when Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt was searched.
  • The exact variant is not reported in the available phase/co-occurrence evidence beyond PMID:16267036, which lists Q1090Q as a benign polymorphism without informative phase or Fanconi-anemia data.
Sources
PP1 Not assessed: no affected-relative segregation data or quantitative LR is available to compare with the PP1 Supporting threshold of 2.08:1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA specification requires co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members and a quantitative Bayes co-segregation score. It assigns PP1 Supporting at LR >=2.08:1, Moderate at LR >=4.3:1, Strong at LR >=18.7:1, and Very Strong at LR >=350:1, with additional caution for a single family or isolated population. No proband-level pedigree, affected-relative genotypes, meioses, or quantitative co-segregation LR is provided for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G. The searched Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx and HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx contain no entry for this variant under the requested notations relevant to PP1.

Rule
PP1 variable weight requires quantitative co-segregation: Supporting LR >=2.08:1; Moderate LR >=4.3:1; Strong LR >=18.7:1; Very Strong LR >=350:1.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA specification defines PP1 as co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members measured by a quantitative co-segregation method, with thresholds of LR >=2.08:1 for Supporting, >=4.3:1 for Moderate, >=18.7:1 for Strong, and >=350:1 for Very Strong.
  • The case evidence provides no family pedigree, affected-relative genotype results, meioses count, or calculated co-segregation LR for this synonymous variant.
  • Easton et al. (PMID:17924331) reports Q1090Q as a benign polymorphism in Table 2, but the extracted finding provides no variant-specific segregation LR or affected-family segregation data and therefore does not establish PP1.
Still missing
  • No proband-level pedigree, affected-relative genotypes, meioses, or quantitative co-segregation LR was found in the case evidence.
  • No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx when searched for this criterion.
  • No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx when searched for this criterion.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18PMID:17924331 ↗
PP4 Not assessed: no exact-variant combined multifactorial likelihood ratio is available for comparison with the ENIGMA PP4 threshold of >=2.08:1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ENIGMA restricts PP4 to a combined multifactorial likelihood ratio toward pathogenicity, with Supporting at LR >=2.08:1, Moderate at LR >=4.3:1, Strong at LR >=18.7:1, and Very Strong at LR >=350:1. The gene-specific clinical-history table contains c.3270A>T but no exact c.3270A>G record, and no exact combined LR for this variant is available. The exact variant is absent from PMID_31853058_BRCA1_clinical_history_LR.xlsx.txt and PMID_17924331_Easton_2007_AJHG.pdf.txt. Therefore PP4 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Use ONLY to capture combined LR towards pathogenicity, based on multifactorial likelihood clinical data; PP4 Supporting requires LR >=2.08:1.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA PP4 rules state Supporting LR >=2.08:1, Moderate LR >=4.3:1, Strong LR >=18.7:1, and Very Strong LR >=350:1.
  • The gene-specific clinical-history table was searched for c.3270A>G and contains only the different c.3270A>T record; no exact-variant combined LR was identified.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G record in PMID_31853058_BRCA1_clinical_history_LR.xlsx.txt; c.3270A>T is a different variant.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry found in PMID_17924331_Easton_2007_AJHG.pdf.txt.
  • No exact-variant combined multifactorial LR supplied by the case evidence.
Sources
BS2 Not assessed: gnomAD reports zero homozygotes, but ENIGMA excludes population observations and no qualifying phenotyped adult was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP applies BS2 only from qualifying clinically or research-cohort probands observed as homozygotes or with specified co-occurrence/phase and age or cancer-unaffectedness criteria, in the absence of Fanconi Anemia features. The available population data report zero homozygotes, but the VCEP explicitly excludes gnomAD observations from BS2 and no qualifying phenotyped adult observation with the required clinical and phase information was identified.

Rule
Apply BS2 from qualifying phenotyped individuals without Fanconi Anemia features, using Table 8 point thresholds; do not apply BS2 to gnomAD frequency observations.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP Table 8 requires BS2 points from phenotyped individuals meeting specified age or cancer-unaffectedness criteria and applies the code in the absence of Fanconi Anemia features.
  • ENIGMA explicitly states that homozygote observations in gnomAD are not to be used for BS2 because frequency-based codes capture those observations.
  • The case evidence reports zero homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and zero homozygotes in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes, which is not qualifying BS2 evidence.
Still missing
  • No qualifying clinically or research-cohort proband with documented age, cancer status, phase/co-occurrence, and absence of Fanconi Anemia features was identified for BS2.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no variant-specific calibrated benign protein or combined mRNA–protein assay result was found for c.3270A>G (p.Gln1090=). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification reserves BS3 for well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect on protein function, with protein-only or combined mRNA-and-protein assay designs; silent variants require functional data that captures both mRNA and protein effects. The governing Specifications Table 9 has no entry for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=. The supplementary functional-assay dataset (ST4) and the Parsons multifactorial supplement also have no exact entry. Therefore, no calibrated variant-specific benign assay result is available to apply BS3.

Rule
ENIGMA v1.2 BS3: apply only for well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function, measured via protein alone or mRNA and protein combined; for silent variants, use assays capturing mRNA and protein effects.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 specifies BS3 for well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function, measured through protein alone or mRNA and protein together; mRNA-only benign results use the alternative RNA code.
  • For silent variants, Table 9 evaluates functional data only from assays that measure mRNA and protein; no Table 9 row matches c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=.
  • Supplementary Table 4 functional-assay data and HUMU-40-1557-SuppT4 contain no exact entry for this variant; no calibrated assay metric, benign-control comparison, or non-damaging result is available for BS3.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= in Specifications_Table9_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact variant entry in the functional-assay dataset ST4 of SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact variant entry in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx.txt.
  • No calibrated variant-specific protein or combined mRNA-and-protein assay result was identified; the available variant-specific publication finding is a benign-polymorphism label, not functional assay evidence.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
BS4 Not assessed: no non-segregating affected relatives or quantitative LR is available to compare with the BS4 Supporting threshold of 0.48. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA specification requires lack of segregation in affected family members measured by a quantitative co-segregation method. It assigns BS4 Supporting for LR <=0.48 and >0.23, Moderate for LR <=0.23, Strong for LR <=0.05, and Very Strong for LR <=0.00285, with a stipulation to assess bilinearity before applying benign Very Strong evidence. No non-segregating affected relatives, pedigree, meioses, or quantitative LR is provided for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G. The searched Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx and HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx contain no entry for this variant under the requested notations relevant to BS4.

Rule
BS4 variable weight requires quantitative lack-of-segregation evidence: Supporting LR <=0.48 and >0.23; Moderate LR <=0.23; Strong LR <=0.05; Very Strong LR <=0.00285.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA specification defines BS4 as lack of segregation in affected family members measured by a quantitative co-segregation method, with Supporting LR <=0.48 and >0.23, Moderate LR <=0.23, Strong LR <=0.05, and Very Strong LR <=0.00285.
  • The case evidence provides no affected-relative non-segregation data, pedigree, meioses count, or calculated LR for this variant.
  • Easton et al. (PMID:17924331) reports Q1090Q as a benign polymorphism in Table 2, but the extracted finding provides no variant-specific non-segregation LR or affected-family segregation data and therefore does not establish BS4.
Still missing
  • No affected-relative non-segregation observations, pedigree, meioses, or quantitative co-segregation LR was found in the case evidence.
  • No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx when searched for this criterion.
  • No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found in HUMU-40-1557-s001.xlsx when searched for this criterion.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18PMID:17924331 ↗
BP5 Not assessed: no exact-variant multifactorial likelihood ratio is available to test against the BP5 Supporting threshold of <=0.48:1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ENIGMA restricts BP5 to a combined multifactorial likelihood ratio against pathogenicity, with Supporting at LR <=0.48:1, Moderate at LR <=0.23:1, Strong at LR <=0.05:1, and Very Strong at LR <=0.00285:1. No exact c.3270A>G clinical-history or combined multifactorial LR is available; the gene-specific table contains the different c.3270A>T record only. Consequently, no value can be substituted into the required inequality and BP5 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Use ONLY to capture combined LR against pathogenicity, based on multifactorial likelihood clinical data; BP5 Supporting requires LR <=0.48:1.
Evidence considered
  • The ENIGMA BP5 rule literally uses the downward comparison operator: Supporting LR <=0.48:1; Moderate LR <=0.23:1; Strong LR <=0.05:1; Very Strong LR <=0.00285:1.
  • No exact-variant LR value is available, so an explicit substituted inequality cannot be completed.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G record in PMID_31853058_BRCA1_clinical_history_LR.xlsx.txt; c.3270A>T is a different variant.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry found in PMID_17924331_Easton_2007_AJHG.pdf.txt.
  • No exact-variant combined multifactorial LR supplied by the case evidence.
Sources
Not applicable · 12· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: the synonymous p.(Gln1090=) substitution is not a PVS1 null-variant class, and SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, below 0.2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 is not applicable. NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G is a synonymous substitution, NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=), not a nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, initiation-codon, deletion, or duplication null variant. The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification limits PVS1 to loss-of-function variant classes evaluated by its PVS1 decision tree; BRCA1 loss of function is an established disease mechanism, but this variant does not enter that tree. SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, below the ENIGMA predicted-splicing threshold of 0.2, with no reported RNA evidence in the reviewed case materials. No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 PVS1 decision tree applies to initiation, nonsense/frameshift, deletion, duplication, and canonical +/-1,2 splice-site null variants; a synonymous variant is outside those classes.
Evidence considered
  • The case normalization identifies NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G as NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=), a synonymous substitution.
  • The case SpliceAI result reports max delta 0.002, while the ENIGMA specification uses SpliceAI >=0.2 for predicted splicing in silent variants.
  • ENIGMA Appendix D states that BRCA1 loss of function is a well-established disease mechanism but restricts PVS1 to variant classes evaluated by its PVS1 decision trees.
Still missing
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
PS1 N/ANot applicable: the variant is synonymous (p.Gln1090=), whereas ENIGMA PS1 requires a same-amino-acid missense or precisely matched splice effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification limits PS1 to a previously established pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense substitution with the same amino-acid change, or to a precisely matched splice effect. NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G is synonymous, p.(Gln1090=), and SpliceAI reports a maximum delta score of 0.002, so neither PS1 pathway applies. No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, or Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2: PS1 applies to same-amino-acid missense substitutions or appropriately matched splice effects; synonymous variants without a matched splice mechanism do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA specifies PS1 for a predicted missense substitution matching a known pathogenic or likely pathogenic amino-acid change, with no confirmed or predicted splice effect; it also allows PS1 only for precisely matched splice events.
  • The case normalization is NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=), and SpliceAI max delta is 0.002, below the ENIGMA no-splicing threshold of 0.1.
  • The four governing VCEP full-text files searched for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, and p.Q1090= contained no exact entry.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
Sources
PS2 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification prohibits PS2 because de novo occurrences have no calibrated predictive capacity for BRCA1/2-related cancers. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification explicitly states that PS2 is not applicable because BRCA1/2-related cancers occur relatively commonly and there is no information calibrating the predictive capacity of de novo occurrences. No de novo evidence can override this governing VCEP rule.

VCEP rule
PS2 not applicable under the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification; de novo evidence is not calibrated for BRCA1/2-related cancers.
Evidence considered
  • Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx states for PM6/confirmed de novo that the criterion is not to be used because BRCA1/2-related cancers occur relatively commonly and no information calibrates the predictive capacity of de novo occurrences; the same document lists PS2 as not applicable.
  • The case evidence contains no validated de novo parental-testing result that would alter the governing VCEP applicability decision.
Still missing
  • The governing specification does not permit PS2 for this BRCA1 variant; therefore de novo parental-testing evidence cannot be converted into PS2 under this framework.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
PM1 VCEPNot applicable: ENIGMA does not use PM1, and residue Q1090 lies outside the specified BRCA1 functional domains. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification states that PM1 is not used and is instead captured through the calibrated bioinformatic/domain framework. The residue is Q1090, outside the specified BRCA1 RING domain (aa 2-101), coiled-coil domain (aa 1391-1424), and BRCT repeats (aa 1650-1857); the case also reports no statistically significant hotspot. Therefore PM1 is not applicable.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2: PM1 do not use; domain and hotspot information is evaluated through the calibrated bioinformatic framework instead.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA Table 1 explicitly says PM1 is not used and is considered as part of the PP3/BP4 bioinformatic analysis.
  • The governing BRCA1 domain definitions are RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT repeats aa 1650-1857; Q1090 is outside all three.
  • The case evidence reports that this variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
Sources
PM4 VCEPNot applicable: p.(Gln1090=) causes no protein length change, whereas ENIGMA PM4 covers only in-frame length changes or stop-loss variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 is not applicable. The variant is synonymous and produces no protein length change: NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=). The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification defines PM4 for protein length changes caused by in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants, and explicitly marks PM4 as not used; the Appendix J summary likewise marks PM4 as not applicable. No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt or Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 PM4 is not used and is limited to in-frame insertion/deletion length changes or stop-loss variants; synonymous substitutions do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • The case normalization identifies NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=), so the encoded protein length is unchanged.
  • ENIGMA specifies PM4 only for protein length changes from in-frame insertions/deletions in non-repeat regions or stop-loss variants and marks the criterion not used for BRCA1/2 interpretation.
Still missing
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
PM5 N/ANot applicable: the variant is synonymous, while ENIGMA PM5 is not used for ordinary missense comparisons and its repurposed form requires a PVS1 protein-termination variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification states that ordinary PM5 for a different pathogenic missense change at the same residue is not used, and its repurposed PM5 variable-weight code is restricted to protein-termination-codon variants annotated with PVS1. NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G is synonymous, p.(Gln1090=), not a missense or PTC variant; therefore PM5 cannot be applied. No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, or Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2: PM5 do not use; PM5 variable-weight applies only to genomic PTC variants receiving PVS1.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA states that ordinary PM5 is not used and that PM5 variable-weight is reserved for genomic PTC variants annotated as PVS1, with exon-specific weights.
  • The case normalization is synonymous p.(Gln1090=), so it is neither a missense change nor a PTC variant.
  • The four governing VCEP full-text files searched for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, and p.Q1090= contained no exact entry.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_Table4_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
Sources
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA specification prohibits PM6 because de novo predictive capacity is uncalibrated for common BRCA1/2-related cancers. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification explicitly marks PM6, confirmed de novo without confirmation of paternity and maternity, as not to be used because BRCA1/2-related cancers occur relatively commonly and de novo predictive capacity is not calibrated.

VCEP rule
PM6 not applicable under the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification.
Evidence considered
  • Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx states that confirmed de novo evidence without confirmation of paternity and maternity is not to be used for PM6, because BRCA1/2-related cancers occur relatively commonly and no calibration exists for de novo predictive capacity.
  • The consolidated case evidence does not provide a permitted PM6 pathway under the governing VCEP specification.
Still missing
  • The governing specification marks PM6 as not applicable; no parental-testing result can be assigned PM6 under this framework.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
PP2 VCEPNot applicable: ENIGMA does not use PP2 for BRCA1, and this variant is synonymous rather than missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification explicitly marks PP2 as not used because BRCA1 has a high frequency of benign missense variants. In addition, this case variant is synonymous rather than missense, so PP2 is not applicable.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2: PP2 do not use.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA Table 1 marks PP2 as do not use because of the high frequency of benign BRCA1 missense variants.
  • The case normalization identifies p.(Gln1090=), a synonymous consequence.
Sources
BP2 VCEPNot applicable: the ENIGMA BRCA1 specification explicitly prohibits BP2 except as part of BS2, which is outside this criterion assessment. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP specification explicitly states that BP2 is not to be used and is applied only in the context of BS2. Because BP2 is excluded by the governing gene-specific framework, no independent cis or trans co-occurrence evidence can activate BP2 for this variant.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 BP2: do not use; applied only in the context of BS2.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP Specifications V1.2, Table 1: BP2 is marked 'Do not use' and is applied only in the context of BS2.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: the synonymous p.(Gln1090=) substitution is not an in-frame insertion/deletion, the variant class required by ENIGMA BP3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 is not applicable. The ENIGMA BRCA1 specification defines BP3 for in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function and explicitly marks BP3 as not used because the relevant assessment is captured by bioinformatic prediction and domain analysis. NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G is synonymous, p.(Gln1090=), not an in-frame deletion or insertion; therefore repeat-region context cannot make BP3 applicable. No entry for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt or Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.

VCEP rule
ENIGMA BRCA1 v1.2 BP3 is not used and, in any event, requires an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region without known function; synonymous substitutions do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • The case normalization identifies NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G as the synonymous protein-preserving change NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=).
  • ENIGMA defines BP3 only for in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions without known function and marks BP3 not used for BRCA1/2 interpretation.
Still missing
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
BP4 N/ANot applicable: BP4 is restricted here to missense or splice-region/intronic variants, whereas c.3270A>G is synonymous. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is not applicable under the requested criterion scope because this is a synonymous variant. The requested framework restricts BP4 evaluation to missense variants or splice-region/intronic variants evaluated through the SpliceAI path; predictor scores are therefore not evaluated for BP4.

Rule
Requested criterion scope: BP4 applies only to missense or splice-region/intronic variants, not synonymous variants.
Evidence considered
  • The variant is synonymous: NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=) / p.(Q1090=).
  • The requested adjudication scope excludes BP4 for synonymous variants, so SpliceAI, BayesDel, and REVEL are not evaluated for BP4.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: p.Gln1090 lies outside ENIGMA BRCA1 functional domains, so BP7's domain-and-BP4 condition is not satisfied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is synonymous and has no predicted splice impact by SpliceAI, but the governing ENIGMA BRCA1 specification applies BP7 to silent variants inside a potentially clinically important functional domain when BP4 is met. Codon 1090 is outside the specified BRCA1 RING domain (aa 2-101), coiled-coil domain (aa 1391-1424), and BRCT repeats (aa 1650-1857), and BP4 is not applicable under the requested scope; therefore BP7 is not applicable. No exact variant-level entry was found when searching SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2: BP7 for silent variants is applied inside a potentially clinically important functional domain if BP4 is met; Appendix J defines the BRCA1 domains.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2 state that BP7 is applied to silent variants inside a potentially clinically important functional domain if BP4 is met, and that BP7 is used in addition to BP4 when SpliceAI is <=0.1.
  • ENIGMA Appendix J defines BRCA1 functional domains as RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT repeats aa 1650-1857; residue 1090 is outside these domains.
  • SpliceAI reports a maximum delta of 0.002 for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, below the ENIGMA no-splicing-impact cutoff of <=0.1.
  • The four declared VCEP full-text files were searched for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, and p.Q1090=; no exact entry was found in any of them.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=)
GRCh38
chr17:43092261 T>C
GRCh37
chr17:41244278 T>C
Location and type
Exon 10 · synonymous
ClinVar
4867717, 631266, 427280, 427258, 187419

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in BRCA1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_007294.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

BRCA1NM_007294.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 23 / 1,613,676 alleles AF 1.43e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 1.3e-05
gnomAD v2.1 3 / 281,990 alleles AF 1.06e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 2.94e-06
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 1.4e-05 · 23 / 1,613,676 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 1.3e-05
European (non-Finnish)23 / 1,179,996 1.9e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 1.1e-05 · 3 / 281,990 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 2.9e-06
European (non-Finnish)3 / 128,548 2.3e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.42532e-05; MAF= 0.00143%, 23/1613676 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.94916e-05; MAF= 0.00195%, 23/1179996 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.298e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.06387e-05; MAF= 0.00106%, 3/281990 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 2.33376e-05; MAF= 0.00233%, 3/128548 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.94e-06.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +398 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -122 bp
0.002
SpliceAI donor lossat -424 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat -37 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.009
Pangolin splice gain
0.007

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.002 is below the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of >=0.2 for predicted splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is synonymous (NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G; p.Gln1090=), so PP3 is considered only through the ENIGMA splice-prediction path. The governing ENIGMA BRCA1 specification applies PP3 for predicted splicing at SpliceAI max delta >=0.2. SpliceAI is available and reports DS_AG 0.002, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, and DS_DL 0.0, with maximum delta 0.002; therefore the threshold is not reached and PP3 is not met. No exact variant-level entry was found when searching SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2: PP3 for predicted splicing in silent variants requires SpliceAI >=0.2.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2 state that PP3 applies to predicted splicing for silent variants when SpliceAI is >=0.2.
  • SpliceAI reports DS_AG 0.002, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, and DS_DL 0.0 for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G; the maximum delta is 0.002.
  • The variant is synonymous, annotated as NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=) / p.(Q1090=).
  • The four declared VCEP full-text files were searched for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, and p.Q1090=; no exact entry was found in any of them.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
Sources
BP4 N/ANot applicable: BP4 is restricted here to missense or splice-region/intronic variants, whereas c.3270A>G is synonymous. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is not applicable under the requested criterion scope because this is a synonymous variant. The requested framework restricts BP4 evaluation to missense variants or splice-region/intronic variants evaluated through the SpliceAI path; predictor scores are therefore not evaluated for BP4.

Rule
Requested criterion scope: BP4 applies only to missense or splice-region/intronic variants, not synonymous variants.
Evidence considered
  • The variant is synonymous: NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, NP_009225.1:p.(Gln1090=) / p.(Q1090=).
  • The requested adjudication scope excludes BP4 for synonymous variants, so SpliceAI, BayesDel, and REVEL are not evaluated for BP4.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: p.Gln1090 lies outside ENIGMA BRCA1 functional domains, so BP7's domain-and-BP4 condition is not satisfied. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is synonymous and has no predicted splice impact by SpliceAI, but the governing ENIGMA BRCA1 specification applies BP7 to silent variants inside a potentially clinically important functional domain when BP4 is met. Codon 1090 is outside the specified BRCA1 RING domain (aa 2-101), coiled-coil domain (aa 1391-1424), and BRCT repeats (aa 1650-1857), and BP4 is not applicable under the requested scope; therefore BP7 is not applicable. No exact variant-level entry was found when searching SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt, Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt, or PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090=.

Rule
ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2: BP7 for silent variants is applied inside a potentially clinically important functional domain if BP4 is met; Appendix J defines the BRCA1 domains.
Evidence considered
  • ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Specifications v1.2 state that BP7 is applied to silent variants inside a potentially clinically important functional domain if BP4 is met, and that BP7 is used in addition to BP4 when SpliceAI is <=0.1.
  • ENIGMA Appendix J defines BRCA1 functional domains as RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, and BRCT repeats aa 1650-1857; residue 1090 is outside these domains.
  • SpliceAI reports a maximum delta of 0.002 for NM_007294.4:c.3270A>G, below the ENIGMA no-splicing-impact cutoff of <=0.1.
  • The four declared VCEP full-text files were searched for c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, and p.Q1090=; no exact entry was found in any of them.
Still missing
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in SupplementaryTables_V1.2_2024-11-18.xlsx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Specifications_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in Appendices_V1.2_2024-11-18.docx.txt.
  • No exact c.3270A>G, p.Gln1090=, or p.Q1090= entry was found in PMID_22505045_Houdayer_2012_HumMutat.pdf.txt.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

9 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.
    Judkins T et al. · 2005 Nov 1
    Judkins et al. list the synonymous BRCA1 variant Q1090Q in Table 2 under Haplotype 1 and label it P, defined in the paper as a benign polymorphism; the study reports sequencing data from 55,630 patients.
    → BP1 · strong Names this variant
    PMID 16267036 ↗
    Source detail
    Q1090Q (P) ... The currently reported clinical significance ... of variants are designated as benign polymorphism (P), deleterious mutation (D), or uncertain clinical significance (U).

    Location Table 2, Haplotype 1; Table 2 note

    Context Clinical BRCA1 whole-gene direct DNA sequencing data from 55,630 patients; variants were assigned to canonical haplotypes using genotype data from 14 haplotype-tagging SNPs.

Other recorded publications

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 26467025 ↗
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2003
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 12692171 ↗
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    Robson ME et al. · 2010
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20065170 ↗
  • Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24366376 ↗
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Expert Statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24493721 ↗
  • PMID 31479213
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 31479213 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.42532e-05; MAF= 0.00143%, 23/1613676 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 1.94916e-05; MAF= 0.00195%, 23/1179996 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.298e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.06387e-05; MAF= 0.00106%, 3/281990 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 2.33376e-05; MAF= 0.00233%, 3/128548 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.94e-06.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (6 clinical laboratories) and as Likely Benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Likely benign by Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 187419)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.