About RET
No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
No variant summary was recorded for this case.
Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is likely pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.
Likely pathogenic.A likely pathogenic classification under the recorded framework.
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
In vitro functional studies demonstrate that the S904F substitution increases RET kinase ATP affinity, accelerates autophosphorylation, and confers gain-of-function transforming activity. These functional defects are consistent with the established gain-of-function mechanism of RET in MEN2 and medullary thyroid carcinoma.
The variant is located in the activation loop of the RET tyrosine kinase domain (codon 904, situated between autophosphorylation residues Y900 and Y905), a critical and well-established functional domain. The RET kinase domain is a known mutational hotspot for pathogenic MEN2-associated variants, and no benign variation has been established at this residue within the activation loop.
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at an extremely low allele frequency (1/1,613,158 alleles, AF = 6.2e-7), well below the PM2 threshold of 0.1%. No homozygotes have been observed.
The variant cosegregates with medullary thyroid carcinoma in multiple affected family members across at least two families. In the largest reported family (PMID:33167350), 7 of 10 carriers developed MTC across multiple generations (average age at diagnosis 46.3 years). A prior report describes a father and son both affected with adult-onset MTC. RET is a gene definitively known to cause MEN2/FMTC.
REVEL score of 0.821 exceeds the 0.7 threshold for pathogenic prediction, supporting a deleterious effect on protein function. BayesDel score of 0.3192 provides borderline additional support. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.0). Multiple in silico algorithms support a deleterious prediction.
The variant has been observed in multiple individuals with medullary thyroid carcinoma, a phenotype that is highly specific for RET-related hereditary cancer syndromes (MEN2A, MEN2B, FMTC). MTC is a hallmark feature of RET-associated disease with high positive predictive value.
No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PS3 supporting, PM1 moderate, PM2 supporting, PP1 moderate, PP3 supporting, PP4 supporting; combination = 2 moderate + 4 supporting, which maps to Likely Pathogenic.
Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.
gnomAD v4.1: 1 / 1,613,158 alleles. Recorded AF 6.19902e-07. Recorded homozygote count 0.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.
2 Likely pathogenic · 1 Uncertain significance. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, conflicting classifications.
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV60693575, n = 2 times).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.
26 criteria with recorded statuses: 6 met · 16 not met · 1 not assessed · 3 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
NM_020975.6:c.2711C>T (p.Ser904Phe) is a missense variant in exon 15 of the RET gene, located in the activation loop of the tyrosine kinase domain.
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at an extremely low allele frequency of 6.2e-7 (1/1,613,158 alleles), meeting PM2_supporting.
The variant is located in the activation loop of the RET kinase domain (codon 904, between autophosphorylation residues Y900 and Y905), a critical functional domain and known mutational hotspot for MEN2-associated variants, meeting PM1_moderate.
In vitro functional studies demonstrate that S904F increases RET kinase ATP affinity, accelerates autophosphorylation, and confers gain-of-function transforming activity, consistent with the established pathogenic mechanism of RET in MEN2, meeting PS3_supporting.
The variant cosegregates with medullary thyroid carcinoma in multiple affected family members across at least two families; in the largest reported family, 7 of 10 carriers developed MTC across multiple generations, meeting PP1_moderate.
REVEL in silico prediction score of 0.821 supports a deleterious effect on protein function, meeting PP3_supporting.
The variant has been observed in multiple individuals with medullary thyroid carcinoma, a phenotype highly specific for RET-related hereditary cancer syndromes, meeting PP4_supporting.
Two moderate criteria (PM1, PP1) and four supporting criteria (PS3, PM2, PP3, PP4) are met. Per ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules (PMID:25741868), this combination is consistent with a classification of Likely Pathogenic.
No criteria match.
Every interpreted variant in RET, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_020975.6. Select a row to find it on the plot.
| Protein | Location | Classification | Link |
|---|
| Remaining individuals1 / 62,414 | 1.6e-05 |
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19902e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613158 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 1.6022e-05; MAF= 0.00160%, 1/62414 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.821. BayesDel score = 0.3192.
8 paper records listed. 3 cited in the classification.
Germline and somatic RET oncogene mutations are found in 98% hereditary and 40% sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas. Our aim was to analyse by in silico and in vitro assays the transforming activity of six rare RET mutations (T338I, V648I, M918V, A883T, S904F and M848T). [...] The in silico analysis showed the highest score value (i.e. 65) for S904F
Location Abstract; cited by PMID:33167350 as reference [26] (Cosci et al. 2011)
Context In silico prediction tools; NIH3T3 fibroblast focus formation assay for transforming activity
Discovery of a S904F secondary mutation in the RET kinase domain [...] Targeted deep sequencing of cancer-related genes from genomic DNA identified a serine-to-phenylalanine substitution at codon 904 (S904F) in RET as the only non-synonymous mutation in the resistant tumor
Location Abstract; Results (Discovery of a S904F secondary mutation); Results (Vandetanib resistance is related to increased ATP affinity); Figure 1d; Figure 2a-c; Figure 3a-d; Discussion para 2
Context In vitro kinase assay using purified recombinant RET kinase domain (aa 658-1072) expressed in Sf9 insect cells; H1299 lung cancer cells transiently expressing CCDC6-RET; Ba/F3 cells with lentiviral CCDC6-RET transduction; X-ray crystallography of S904F RET kinase domain at 2.3A; thermal shift assay; molecular dynamics simulation
The p.Ser904Phe variant was found in a family with several members affected by MTC (Figure 1): eight individuals were tested and found to carry the variant, while two other relatives were obligate carriers. Out of 10 carriers, seven developed slowly progressing MTC at an average age of 46.3 years and none manifested other RET-related problems.
Location Section 2.3 (Families with Unclassified Variants), para 1; Table 3; Figure 1; Discussion para 5; Section 4.4
Context Clinical cohort study of 163 subjects undergoing RET genetic testing at a cancer genetics clinic; segregation analysis and genotype-phenotype correlation.
Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.19902e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1613158 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 1.6022e-05; MAF= 0.00160%, 1/62414 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 24963)
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.821. BayesDel score = 0.3192.
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV60693575, n = 2 times).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.