0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

WT1 c.1107A>G, p.(Arg369=)

NM_024426.4:c.1107A>G NP_077744.3:p.(Arg369=) View identifiers
Classification
Benign

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is benign. Select a step to read what it means.

Benign.A benign classification under the recorded framework.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About WT1

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 4
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 4
BA1Stand alone
BA1 · stand alone

Population frequency is well above the benign stand-alone threshold of 0.01. This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 at AF 0.235708 and in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 0.180386, with East Asian frequencies of 0.697872 and 0.671155, respectively.

BS1Strong
BS1 · strong

Population frequency is above the strong benign threshold of 0.003. This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 at AF 0.235708 and in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 0.180386, both greatly exceeding that threshold.

BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Available computational evidence supports no impact on the gene product or splicing. The variant is synonymous, p.(Arg369=), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01.

BP7Supporting
BP7 · supporting

This is a synonymous variant, WT1 c.1107A>G (p.Arg369=), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, supporting no effect on RNA splicing.

Recorded classification: Benign

gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
291,078 / 1,613,638 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 291,078 / 1,613,638 alleles. Recorded AF 0.180386. Recorded homozygote count 35597.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.235708; MAF= 23.57076%, 66569/282422 alleles, homozygotes = 11532) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.697872; MAF= 69.78717%, 13903/19922 alleles, homozygotes = 4884); grpmax FAF= 0.685973.

No screenshot for this evidence
Computational predictions
Not recorded

No SpliceAI or REVEL score is recorded in the fields used for this tile.

ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB oncogenicity for this specific variant: Unknown Oncogenic Effect (variant has not been individually curated).

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
Not assessed

No COSMIC evidence statement is recorded in this case.

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 4 met · 5 not met · 13 not assessed · 6 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

The WT1 c.1107A>G (p.Arg369=) variant has been reported in ClinVar as benign.

This variant is common in population databases, with an allele frequency of 0.235708 in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.180386 in gnomAD v4.1, which is far above benign population thresholds.

In silico evidence supports a benign interpretation because this synonymous change does not alter the encoded amino acid and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01.

Met · 4

BA1 Stand alonePopulation frequency is well above the benign stand-alone threshold of 0.01. This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 at AF 0.235708 and in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 0.180386, with East Asian frequencies of 0.697872 and 0.671155, respectively. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 AF 0.235708
  • East Asian AF 0.697872
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 0.180386
  • East Asian AF 0.671155
Sources
BS1 StrongPopulation frequency is above the strong benign threshold of 0.003. This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 at AF 0.235708 and in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 0.180386, both greatly exceeding that threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 AF 0.235708
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 0.180386
Sources
BP4 SupportingAvailable computational evidence supports no impact on the gene product or splicing. The variant is synonymous, p.(Arg369=), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • synonymous protein prediction p.(Arg369=)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.01
Sources
BP7 SupportingThis is a synonymous variant, WT1 c.1107A>G (p.Arg369=), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, supporting no effect on RNA splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • synonymous protein prediction p.(Arg369=)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.01
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PVS1 This variant is a synonymous change, WT1 c.1107A>G (p.Arg369=), and does not fall within the generic PVS1 null-variant categories for nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1 or 2 splice-site variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • WT1 loss of function is an established disease mechanism
  • the variant is not a generic PVS1-type null variant
Sources
pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentpvs1_generic_framework ↗
PS4 Available evidence does not show that this variant is enriched in individuals with WT1-related germline disease compared with controls. A ClinVar benign classification and very high population frequency argue against pathogenic case enrichment. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar benign assertion
  • very high population frequency in gnomAD
Sources
PM1 This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot, so available evidence does not support location in a critical mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Cancer Hotspots did not identify a hotspot row for WT1 Arg369
Sources
PM2 This variant is not absent from population databases. In gnomAD v2.1 the overall allele frequency is 0.235708 and in gnomAD v4.1 it is 0.180386, both far above the usual rarity threshold of 0.001 for PM2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 AF 0.235708
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF 0.180386
Sources
PP3 Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below commonly used splice-impact thresholds. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.01
Sources

Not assessed · 13 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No confirmed de novo data with established maternity and paternity were identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • confirmed parental testing
PS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect of this specific variant were identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • variant-specific functional assay data
PM3 No data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • phase data in a recessive disease context
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence data were identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • de novo occurrence data
PP1 No segregation data were identified showing this variant tracking with disease in affected family members. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • family segregation data
PP4 No individual-level phenotype data were identified to show a WT1-related clinical presentation that is highly specific for disease caused by this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • case-level phenotype information
PP5 An external clinical database classification was identified, but this criterion was not used as stand-alone evidence for pathogenicity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar classification available
Sources
BS2 The variant is observed many times in population databases, including numerous homozygotes, but phenotype-confirmed healthy adult observations were not identified for formal BS2 application. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • 11
  • 532 homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1
  • 35
  • 597 homozygotes in gnomAD v4.1
Still missing
  • phenotype-confirmed healthy carrier data
Sources
BS3 No well-established functional studies showing a benign effect of this specific variant were identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • variant-specific benign functional assay data
BS4 No family data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • nonsegregation data
BP2 No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • phase data
BP5 No evidence was identified for an alternate molecular explanation that would account for the observed phenotype independently of this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • case-level alternate diagnosis data
BP6 An external clinical database classification was identified, but this criterion was not used as stand-alone evidence for benignity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar benign classification available
Sources
Not applicable · 6· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/AThis criterion applies to a different nucleotide change that produces the same amino acid substitution as a known pathogenic variant. This variant is synonymous and no amino acid substitution is produced. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • predicted protein consequence is p.(Arg369=)
PM4 N/AThis criterion applies to protein length changes from in-frame deletions or insertions or stop-loss variants. This variant is synonymous and does not alter protein length. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • predicted protein consequence is p.(Arg369=)
PM5 N/AThis criterion applies to a novel missense change at a residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been established. This variant is synonymous and not a missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • predicted protein consequence is p.(Arg369=)
PP2 N/AThis criterion applies to missense variants in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense is a common disease mechanism. This variant is synonymous, not missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • predicted protein consequence is p.(Arg369=)
BP1 N/AThis criterion applies to missense variants in genes where truncating variants are primarily pathogenic. This variant is synonymous and not missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • predicted protein consequence is p.(Arg369=)
BP3 N/AThis criterion applies to in-frame deletions or insertions in repetitive regions without known function. This variant is a synonymous single-nucleotide substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • single-nucleotide synonymous substitution

Identifiers

Gene
WT1
Transcript
NM_024426.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_024426.4:c.1107A>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_077744.3:p.(Arg369=)
GRCh38
chr11:32396399 T>C
GRCh37
chr11:32417945 T>C

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in WT1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_024426.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

WT1NM_024426.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 291,078 / 1,613,638 alleles AF 0.18 · 35597 homozygotes · FAF 0.665
gnomAD v2.1 66,569 / 282,422 alleles AF 0.236 · 11532 homozygotes · FAF 0.686

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 0.18 · 291078 / 1,613,638 alleles · 35597 hom · FAF 0.66
East Asian30108 / 44,860 0.6710092 hom
South Asian32191 / 91,058 0.355879 hom
Admixed American20521 / 59,984 0.343749 hom
Remaining individuals12655 / 62,492 0.21606 hom
Amish179 / 910 0.223 hom
Middle Eastern1124 / 5,992 0.19117 hom
Ashkenazi Jewish5273 / 29,608 0.18452 hom
European (Finnish)10979 / 63,800 0.17959 hom
European (non-Finnish)169781 / 1,179,968 0.1412283 hom
African/African American8267 / 74,966 0.11437 hom

gnomAD v2.1

AF 0.24 · 66569 / 282,422 alleles · 11532 hom · FAF 0.69
East Asian13903 / 19,922 0.74884 hom
Admixed American13014 / 35,402 0.372537 hom
South Asian10896 / 30,608 0.361975 hom
Remaining individuals1419 / 7,212 0.2140 hom
Ashkenazi Jewish1832 / 10,368 0.18156 hom
European (Finnish)4363 / 24,938 0.17363 hom
European (non-Finnish)18363 / 129,014 0.141329 hom
African/African American2779 / 24,958 0.11148 hom

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.180386; MAF= 18.03862%, 291078/1613638 alleles, homozygotes = 35597) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.671155; MAF= 67.11547%, 30108/44860 alleles, homozygotes = 10092); grpmax FAF= 0.664805.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.235708; MAF= 23.57076%, 66569/282422 alleles, homozygotes = 11532) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.697872; MAF= 69.78717%, 13903/19922 alleles, homozygotes = 4884); grpmax FAF= 0.685973.

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingAvailable computational evidence supports no impact on the gene product or splicing. The variant is synonymous, p.(Arg369=), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • synonymous protein prediction p.(Arg369=)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.01
Sources
BP7 SupportingThis is a synonymous variant, WT1 c.1107A>G (p.Arg369=), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, supporting no effect on RNA splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • synonymous protein prediction p.(Arg369=)
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.01
Sources
PP3 Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below commonly used splice-impact thresholds. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score 0.01
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.180386; MAF= 18.03862%, 291078/1613638 alleles, homozygotes = 35597) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.671155; MAF= 67.11547%, 30108/44860 alleles, homozygotes = 10092); grpmax FAF= 0.664805.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.235708; MAF= 23.57076%, 66569/282422 alleles, homozygotes = 11532) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.697872; MAF= 69.78717%, 13903/19922 alleles, homozygotes = 4884); grpmax FAF= 0.685973.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (20 clinical laboratories) and as benign (1 clinical laboratory).

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01).

Functional

OncoKB oncogenicity for this specific variant: Unknown Oncogenic Effect (variant has not been individually curated).

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV60066333, n = 111 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.