0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

GALNT12 c.460C>T, p.(Arg154Trp)

NM_024642.5:c.460C>T NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp) Missense · exon 2 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About GALNT12

GALNT12 encodes a member of the UDP-GalNAc:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase family, enzymes that initiate O-linked glycosylation by transferring N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) to serine or threonine residues on proteins. These glycosylation modifications are important for the proper function of many cellular proteins. Mutations in this gene are associated with increased susceptibility to colorectal cancer, indicating a role in colorectal cancer predisposition.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

With no ClinGen VCEP for GALNT12, generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules applied: no criterion was met (gnomAD AF 2.8e-05; REVEL 0.607 in gray zone), so the variant is classified as VUS.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
45 / 1,612,678 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 45 / 1,612,678 alleles. Recorded AF 2.79039e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.98815e-05; MAF= 0.00199%, 5/251490 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.000123031; MAF= 0.01230%, 2/16256 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.132e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.0001085894233901618, 2/18418 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.607 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.607. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
4 reported laboratory submissions

4 Uncertain significance. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
No screenshot for this evidence
Functional evidence
Not recorded

No standalone functional evidence summary is recorded in evidence_summary.functional.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
3 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV66663279, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 0 met · 5 not met · 19 not assessed · 4 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No ClinGen VCEP/CSPEC exists for GALNT12 (case_summary.json cspec.found=false; vcep_materials.json note='no cspec url available'); generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definitions were used as the governing framework for this group.

Automated same-residue/same-change comparator harvesting (pm5_candidates.json) was explicitly skipped by the upstream pipeline rather than executed and negative, so PS1 and PM5 remain not_assessed rather than not_met.

The only hotspot check available (cancerhotspots.org) is a somatic cancer resource, returned negative, but cannot address germline PM1 domain/mutational-cluster criteria for this variant; no domain/structural data was found for GALNT12 residue 154.

No GALNT12 gene-level missense constraint metrics (gnomAD Z-score/o-e ratio) or curated missense-vs-truncating mechanism statement were present in the bundle, precluding assessment of PP2 and BP1.

GALNT12 has no ClinGen VCEP specification (cspec.found = false, vcep_materials.final_classification_framework.found = false); generic ACMG/AMP 2015 framework applies for PS3/BS3.

The case evidence bundle (prefetch.json, evidence.json, literature_pass.json, vcep_materials.json) contains no functional/biochemical assay results for this variant; the two retrieved full-text papers are ACMG/Sherloc methodology references, not variant-specific functional studies.

Both PS3 and BS3 are returned as not_assessed due to absence of any qualifying functional evidence in the case materials.

No GALNT12 ClinGen VCEP CSPEC PP3/BP4 lookup was available for this case; the generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (generic_acmg_combination_rules) was applied instead.

The variant is a missense substitution, so only REVEL was used per the lab's mechanism-matching rule (missense -> REVEL only; splice-path/SpliceAI reserved for intronic, synonymous, or non-canonical-splice-position variants).

REVEL = 0.607 falls in the defined gray zone [0.250, 0.750], so neither PP3 nor BP4 is met.

BayesDel (0.252221) was not used because no verified published calibration threshold for BayesDel is available to this pipeline.

This variant is not synonymous, so BP7 is not applicable and was not assessed.

No GALNT12-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework was retrieved; generic ACMG/AMP population rules were applied.

The variant is rare but not absent: population data support neither BA1 nor BS1, and the observed alleles prevent PM2.

No individual-level healthy adult phenotype evidence was available for BS2.

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM2 Not met: the variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (45/1,612,678 alleles, AF 2.8e-05), not absent from population databases. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is not met because the exact variant is present in multiple population datasets rather than absent or consistently undetected. gnomAD v4.1 identifies 45 alternate alleles among 1,612,678 alleles (AF 2.79039e-05), gnomAD v2.1 identifies 5/251,490 alleles (AF 1.98815e-05), and gnomAD-Canada identifies 2/18,418 alleles (AF 0.0001085894), with zero homozygotes in each dataset.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 PM2: variant absent from or extremely rare in population databases; this exact variant is observed in several population datasets, so PM2 is not met.
Evidence considered
  • The exact NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (GALNT12 p.Arg154Trp) allele is observed in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 2.79039e-05 (45/1,612,678 alleles), with 0 homozygotes.
  • The exact allele is observed in gnomAD v2.1 at AF 1.98815e-05 (5/251,490 alleles), with 0 homozygotes.
  • The exact allele is observed in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 at AF 0.0001085894 (2/18,418 alleles), with 0 homozygotes.
  • The allele is rare, but PM2 requires absence or sufficiently limited observation under the applicable framework; these confirmed observations prevent PM2 from being met under the generic fallback.
Sources
gnomad_v2 ↗gnomad_v4 ↗gnomad_canada ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP3 Not met: REVEL score 0.607 falls in the gray zone [0.25-0.75], below the >0.75 PP3 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_024642.5:c.460C>T is a missense substitution (NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp)) in GALNT12. No GALNT12 ClinGen VCEP CSPEC was found for this case (cspec.found=false, gene_vcep_dir=null), so the lab's generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration rule (generic_acmg_combination_rules) applies: for a missense variant, evaluate REVEL only and do not fall back to the SpliceAI-based splice-path rule even though this variant also has a SpliceAI score, and do not combine the two predictors. REVEL score = 0.607 falls within the defined gray zone [0.250-0.750], which is neither the PP3 threshold (>0.750) nor the BP4 threshold (<0.250). Therefore PP3 is not met. BayesDel score (0.252221) exists in evidence but per this pipeline's calibration policy has no verified published threshold and is not used for PP3/BP4. SpliceAI max delta (0.312) is present but is explicitly excluded from consideration for this missense variant per the governing rule, which reserves the SpliceAI path for intronic/synonymous/non-canonical-splice-position variants only.

Rule
generic_acmg_missense_revel_gray_zone
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score = 0.607 (source_registry key 'revel'), which lies within the generic gray zone [0.250, 0.750] defined in generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, so PP3 is not triggered.
  • case_summary.json cspec.found=false and review_manifest.json gene_vcep_dir=null confirm no GALNT12 VCEP CSPEC governs this variant, so the generic ACMG fallback calibration applies.
  • Variant is a missense substitution (p.(Arg154Trp)), so per generic_acmg_classification_rules.md the REVEL-only missense path governs and the SpliceAI-based splice path (which would otherwise indicate delta=0.312 > 0.2) must not be used for this variant type.
Still missing
  • No GALNT12-specific VCEP PP3/BP4 lookup table was found to override the generic REVEL gray-zone call.
  • BayesDel score exists but lacks a verified published calibration threshold in this pipeline and could not be used.
Sources
revelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules
BA1 Not met: highest observed population frequency is 8.0e-05 (gnomAD v4.1 African/African American), far below the >5% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is far below the generic ACMG/AMP BA1 threshold of greater than 5% population frequency. gnomAD v4.1 reports an overall allele frequency of 2.79039e-05 (45/1,612,678 alleles), with the highest reported population frequency in African/African American individuals of 7.99574e-05; gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada show similarly rare frequencies. BA1 is therefore not met.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 BA1: allele frequency >5% supports BA1; frequencies well below this threshold do not meet BA1.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: overall AF 2.79039e-05, 45/1,612,678 alleles; maximum group AF 3.467e-05; highest named subpopulation AF 7.99574e-05 in African/African American individuals; homozygotes 0.
  • gnomAD v2.1: overall AF 1.98815e-05, 5/251,490 alleles; maximum group FAF 2.132e-05; homozygotes 0.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0: AF 0.0001085894, 2/18,418 alleles; homozygotes 0.
  • Generic ACMG/AMP framework was used because no GALNT12-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework was retrieved; BA1 requires a population frequency above 5%.
Sources
gnomad_v2 ↗gnomad_v4 ↗gnomad_canada ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BS1 Not met: maximum observed allele frequency is 2.8e-05 (gnomAD v4.1), not higher than expected for a rare Mendelian disease allele. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The observed population frequency does not appear higher than expected for a rare Mendelian disease allele: the maximum observed frequency is 2.79039e-05 overall in gnomAD v4.1, 3.467e-05 by group FAF, and 0.0001703 in the small gnomAD-Canada non-Finnish group. These values are not evidence of a common or excess allele. A GALNT12-specific disease prevalence, penetrance, and maximum credible allele-frequency threshold were not available, so BS1 cannot be strengthened beyond this negative assessment and should receive human review if a disease-specific threshold is later established.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 BS1: allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder; application requires a disease-specific expected-frequency context when available.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports overall AF 2.79039e-05 and maximum group FAF 3.467e-05; the highest named subpopulation AF is 7.99574e-05 in African/African American individuals.
  • gnomAD-Canada reports AF 0.0001085894 overall and 0.0001703 in the non-Finnish European group, based on 2 observed alleles; this is a sparse observation rather than evidence of a high-frequency allele.
  • No GALNT12-specific VCEP/CSPEC rule or disease prevalence/penetrance threshold was present in the case bundle; generic ACMG/AMP guidance was therefore used for the qualitative BS1 assessment.
Still missing
  • No validated GALNT12-specific disease prevalence, penetrance estimate, or maximum credible allele-frequency threshold was retrieved.
Sources
gnomad_v2 ↗gnomad_v4 ↗gnomad_canada ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP4 Not met: REVEL score 0.607 is above the <0.25 BP4 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Same generic ACMG missense-path calibration as PP3: REVEL score = 0.607 is within the gray zone [0.250, 0.750], above the BP4 threshold of <0.250. Therefore BP4 is not met. As with PP3, BayesDel (0.252221) is not a validated predictor for this pipeline and SpliceAI (max delta 0.312) is not applicable because this is a missense variant governed by the REVEL-only rule, not the splice-path rule.

Rule
generic_acmg_missense_revel_gray_zone
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score = 0.607 (source_registry key 'revel') is above the BP4 threshold of <0.250 defined in generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, so BP4 is not triggered.
  • Variant is a missense substitution, so the REVEL-only missense path governs per generic_acmg_classification_rules.md; the SpliceAI splice-path rule (delta=0.312) does not apply to this variant type and cannot be substituted.
Still missing
  • No GALNT12-specific VCEP PP3/BP4 lookup table was found to override the generic REVEL gray-zone call.
  • BayesDel score exists but lacks a verified published calibration threshold in this pipeline and could not be used.
Sources
revelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules

Not assessed · 19 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no evidence of a different nucleotide change at this codon producing the identical p.Arg154Trp change with an established pathogenic classification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No ClinGen VCEP/CSPEC exists for GALNT12 (case_summary.json cspec.found=false; vcep_materials.json note='no cspec url available'), so generic ACMG applies. PS1 requires a different nucleotide change at the same codon that results in the identical amino acid change (p.Arg154Trp) already established as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. The pm5_candidates.json artifact, which harvests same-residue ClinVar comparator variants, explicitly declined to run ('eligible_for_classic_pm5_search': false, reason: unable to confirm classic same-residue semantics safely') and returned zero candidates, so no same-amino-acid-change comparator data is available in this case bundle to evaluate PS1.

Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json: cspec.found=false, confirming no gene-specific VCEP framework exists for GALNT12, so generic ACMG/AMP criteria definitions govern this group.
  • pm5_candidates.json: 'eligible_for_classic_pm5_search': false with reason 'Unable to confirm classic same-residue PM5 semantics safely; skipping automatic candidate harvesting' and 'candidates': [] -- no same-residue or same-amino-acid comparator variants were retrieved for this case.
Still missing
  • No same-amino-acid-change (p.Arg154Trp reached via a different nucleotide substitution) comparator search was performed in this case; pm5_candidates.json harvesting was skipped entirely rather than run and found empty.
  • No ClinVar or literature search specifically for other c.460C>T-equivalent codon changes producing p.Arg154Trp was surfaced in the bundle.
PS2 Not assessed: no confirmed de novo occurrence of p.Arg154Trp is documented in the proband or family. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-specific evidence documents a confirmed de novo occurrence of NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp) in the proband, parental genotypes, maternity/paternity, or phenotype consistency. The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no proband or trio testing result sufficient to assess PS2.

Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle identifies the variant as NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (NP_078918.3:p.Arg154Trp) but provides no proband-specific de novo, parental-testing, maternity/paternity, or phenotype-consistency data.
  • No applicable GALNT12 ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP framework was found; generic ACMG/AMP criteria are therefore the fallback framework, but the evidentiary requirements for PS2 are not documented in this case.
Still missing
  • Proband-level variant report and phenotype-linked case record
  • Tested parental genotypes with confirmed maternity and paternity
  • Evidence that the variant is absent in both biological parents
  • Phenotype consistency with a GALNT12-associated disorder
PS3 Not assessed: no functional assay data for this variant (e.g., glycosyltransferase activity) was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No functional/biochemical assay data (e.g., in vitro glycosyltransferase activity assay, complementation study, or other validated functional characterization) for NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp) in GALNT12 was found anywhere in the case bundle. GALNT12 has no ClinGen VCEP-specific PS3 specification, so generic ACMG/AMP applies, which still requires a validated assay with appropriate controls. The two full-text publications available in this case (PMID:25741868, PMID:26467025) are general ACMG classification methodology papers (the original ACMG/AMP 2015 guideline and the Sherloc scoring system paper) and do not report any variant-specific functional assay results for this variant.

Still missing
  • No functional assay (e.g. enzymatic activity, splicing, cell-based) data for this specific variant identified in prefetch/evidence/literature sources
  • No gene-specific (VCEP) PS3 calibration available for GALNT12
PS4 Not assessed: no case-control enrichment data, odds ratio, or significance was available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No usable case-control enrichment dataset was identified for the exact variant NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (NP_078918.3:p.Arg154Trp). The available record contains no affected-case versus control counts, odds ratio, or statistical significance, so PS4 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS4 requires statistically significant enrichment in affected individuals compared with controls; no VCEP specification was available.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated evidence bundle contains no case-control cohort, affected-case count, control count, odds ratio, or p-value for the exact variant.
  • ClinVar lists four clinical-testing submissions for the exact variant, all classified as uncertain significance; these submissions are not case-control enrichment evidence.
Still missing
  • Affected-case and control counts for the exact variant or an appropriately justified allele-level case-control analysis
  • Statistical enrichment estimate and significance, with cohort definitions and control ascertainment
PM1 Not assessed: no established germline mutational hotspot or critical domain map is defined for GALNT12. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No GALNT12 VCEP/CSPEC-defined mutational hotspot or critical functional domain map is available. The only automated hotspot check performed (cancerhotspots.org, a somatic cancer hotspot resource) returned 'no_result' / 'found': false with evidence_sentence 'This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot,' but this is a somatic cancer database and not a germline structural/functional domain source, so it cannot establish or exclude PM1 for a germline colorectal-cancer-susceptibility gene. No UniProt/Pfam domain boundary or structural (X-ray/cryo-EM) data for the GALNT12 ppGalNAc-T catalytic or lectin domains, and no data on residue 154's proximity to a catalytic motif, is present anywhere in the bundle. COSMIC shows only 3 somatic observations at this variant (not indicative of an established hotspot).

Evidence considered
  • evidence.json hotspots block: source CANCERHOTSPOTS, query 'GALNT12 R154', search_status 'no_result', found false, evidence_sentence 'This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.' -- a somatic cancer hotspot check only, insufficient alone to assess germline PM1 domain criticality.
  • evidence.json cosmic block: 'This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV66663279, n = 3 times)' -- a low observation count, not supportive of a mutational hotspot.
Still missing
  • No UniProt/Pfam/InterPro domain boundary annotation for GALNT12 (catalytic GT domain vs. lectin domain vs. stem/linker region) is present in the bundle to determine whether Arg154 lies in a critical functional domain.
  • No structural (crystal structure / AlphaFold-based) analysis of residue 154 is present in the bundle.
  • cancerhotspots.org is a somatic hotspot database and does not address germline PM1 mutational cluster region evidence for GALNT12; no germline-specific mutational cluster analysis was performed.
PM3 Not assessed: no affected-proband observations or a pathogenic variant documented in trans with p.Arg154Trp were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable GALNT12-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework is available, so generic ACMG/AMP criteria were used. The case bundle contains no affected-proband observations, family-level genotypes, phase information, or pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant documented in trans with NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp). Therefore PM3 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM3: pathogenic variants in trans with the variant under evaluation can support recessive disease; phase and phenotype/inheritance context must be established.
Evidence considered
  • The governing materials report that no GALNT12 CSPEC/VCEP specification was found and that generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria are the fallback framework.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no usable evidence of affected probands, segregation, phase, or a pathogenic/likely pathogenic allele in trans for this variant.
  • The ClinVar record is an uncertain-significance record and does not provide phase-resolved allelic evidence for PM3; its classification was not used as evidence for this criterion.
Still missing
  • Affected proband or case-level observations for the variant are not provided.
  • A confirmed pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in trans is not provided.
  • Parental testing or other phase data establishing trans configuration is not provided.
  • Inheritance mode relevant to PM3 is not established in the case evidence.
Sources
PM5 Not assessed: no other missense change at Arg154 with an established pathogenic classification was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 requires a different missense change at the same residue (Arg154) previously established as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. pm5_candidates.json explicitly did not perform the classic same-residue comparator search for this case ('eligible_for_classic_pm5_search': false; 'candidates': []; recommendation.level': 'not_applicable' with instruction to not apply PM5 from this artifact alone), so no alternate-amino-acid-at-residue-154 pathogenic comparator data is available.

Evidence considered
  • pm5_candidates.json: residue.position=154, reference_aa='R', observed_alt_aa='W'; eligible_for_classic_pm5_search=false; candidate_summary shows 0 total/same-residue/expert-panel/majority candidates; recommendation instructs not to apply PM5 from this artifact alone.
Still missing
  • Same-residue (position 154) alternate missense change comparator search was never executed for this case; pm5_candidates.json returned zero candidates by design, not because none exist.
  • No ClinVar query for other GALNT12 p.Arg154X variants and their classifications was surfaced in the bundle.
PM6 Not assessed: no suspected de novo occurrence of p.Arg154Trp without parental confirmation is documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-specific evidence documents a suspected de novo occurrence of NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp) without adequate parental confirmation. The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family history, parental testing, maternity/paternity, or proband phenotype evidence sufficient to assess PM6.

Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides no suspected-de novo case report or parental-genotype information for this variant.
  • The bundle's literature packet contains only generic variant-interpretation papers and no variant-specific family or de novo observation.
Still missing
  • Proband-level case observation with relevant phenotype
  • Parental testing or a documented reason parental testing was unavailable
  • Maternity and paternity confirmation or equivalent family verification
  • A clinical report supporting suspected de novo status
PP1 Not assessed: no affected or unaffected relatives were tested, so cosegregation with disease cannot be evaluated. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected or unaffected relatives carrying or lacking NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp) are reported, and no informative meioses or segregation counts are available. Therefore, cosegregation with disease cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no pedigree, family genotypes, affected-relative observations, unaffected-relative observations, or informative-meiosis count for this variant.
  • No variant-specific publication in the available literature packet reports segregation of NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp).
Still missing
  • Pedigree with affected-status definitions
  • Genotypes of informative affected relatives
  • Genotypes of informative unaffected relatives where relevant
  • Number of informative meioses and segregation results
  • Phenotype definition and age-related penetrance considerations
PP2 Not assessed: no gene-level missense constraint metric (e.g., gnomAD missense Z-score) for GALNT12 was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 requires the variant to be missense in a gene with (a) a low rate of benign missense variation and (b) missense changes as a common/established mechanism of disease. No gene-level missense constraint metric (e.g., gnomAD missense Z-score or observed/expected ratio) for GALNT12 is present anywhere in the bundle. pvs1_gene_context.json establishes only that loss-of-function/germline literature supports a GALNT12-truncating-variant disease mechanism ('lof_mechanism_supported': true) for the associated basal cell carcinoma predisposition phenotype; it does not characterize missense variation as a common disease mechanism, and no missense-specific mechanism data is present.

Evidence considered
  • pvs1_gene_context.json: mechanism_rationale states 'Targeted germline literature review identified disease-focused publications supporting GALNT12 loss of function as a germline disease mechanism' and lof_mechanism_supported=true -- documents an LOF/truncating mechanism, not a missense-driven mechanism, and provides no missense-rate constraint data needed for PP2.
Still missing
  • No gnomAD constraint metrics (missense Z, o/e ratio) for GALNT12 are present in the bundle.
  • No curated statement (VCEP or peer-reviewed) establishing that missense variants are a common/established mechanism of GALNT12-related disease is present; available gene-context evidence (pvs1_gene_context.json) instead documents a loss-of-function/truncating disease mechanism.
PP4 Not assessed: no patient-level phenotype documentation matching a GALNT12-associated disorder was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The case bundle does not provide a patient phenotype or a highly specific phenotype matching a GALNT12-associated disorder for this exact variant. ClinVar condition labels include colorectal cancer susceptibility but the exact submission record provides no patient-level phenotype documentation, so PP4 cannot be applied.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP4 may be used when the patient's phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single-gene etiology; no VCEP specification was available.
Evidence considered
  • The exact-match ClinVar record lists conditions including Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 1, not provided, and not specified, but does not provide patient-level phenotype details or a phenotype-specific clinical assessment.
  • No case phenotype, diagnostic criteria, or highly specific disease presentation is present in the consolidated case-evidence bundle.
Still missing
  • Documented patient phenotype and clinical diagnosis for the case under review
  • Evidence that the phenotype is highly specific for the relevant GALNT12-associated disorder rather than a nonspecific cancer indication
Sources
PP5 Not assessed: no ClinVar expert-panel pathogenic classification exists for this exact variant; all four submissions are uncertain significance. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 is not triggered. The exact ClinVar record for NM_024642.5:c.460C>T has no expert-panel submission; all four submissions are clinical-testing, single-submitter assertions classified as uncertain significance. Therefore, there is no exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification eligible for PP5.

Rule
Apply PP5 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification; exclude ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions.
Evidence considered
  • The exact-match ClinVar audit reports expert_panel_submissions = 0 and four submissions, all classified as Uncertain significance with review status criteria provided, single submitter.
  • Ordinary laboratory submissions and the aggregate ClinVar label were excluded from PP5 by the requested expert-panel-only rule.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic would be required to assess PP5 under the requested rule
Sources
BS2 Not assessed: no homozygous carriers or healthy adult genotype observations were reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No homozygous carriers are reported in gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, or gnomAD-Canada, and no case-specific healthy adult genotype/phenotype observations were provided. The absence of homozygotes is not positive BS2 evidence for this heterozygous missense variant. BS2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 BS2: the variant is observed in a healthy adult individual for a disorder with complete or near-complete penetrance; suitable individual-level phenotype and inheritance context are required.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 251,490 alleles.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 1,612,678 alleles.
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0 reports 0 homozygotes among 18,418 alleles.
  • Aggregate population counts do not document individual adult health status or provide the phenotype and age-at-assessment information required to apply BS2.
Still missing
  • No documented healthy adult carriers with adequate phenotype and age information were provided.
  • No independent evidence establishing the relevant inheritance model, penetrance, or whether homozygous observation would be expected was provided.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no functional assay data showing wild-type-like activity for this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No functional/biochemical assay data showing normal/wild-type-like activity for NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp) in GALNT12 was found anywhere in the case bundle. GALNT12 has no ClinGen VCEP-specific BS3 specification, so generic ACMG/AMP applies. The two full-text publications available (PMID:25741868, PMID:26467025) are general ACMG classification methodology papers and contain no variant-specific functional results for this variant.

Still missing
  • No functional assay data (validated or otherwise) demonstrating normal activity for this specific variant was identified in the case bundle
  • No gene-specific (VCEP) BS3 calibration available for GALNT12
BS4 Not assessed: no informative affected relatives lacking the variant were documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No reliable non-segregation data are documented. The case bundle does not identify informative affected relatives who lack the variant, nor does it provide phenotype, age, penetrance, or testing-quality information needed to interpret an apparent non-segregation observation.

Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no affected-relative genotype-negative observations and no family-level non-segregation analysis for this variant.
  • Population observations in gnomAD and the ClinVar classification do not constitute BS4 non-segregation evidence and were not used for this criterion.
Still missing
  • Pedigree and clinical phenotyping of relatives
  • Genotypes of affected relatives
  • Age and penetrance information for relatives reported as variant-negative
  • Validated testing methodology and call-quality details for family members
BP1 Not assessed: no gene-specific evidence establishes that missense changes are not a recognized disease mechanism in GALNT12. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 requires established gene-specific evidence that missense variants are not a recognized mechanism of disease (i.e., disease is driven primarily by truncating/LOF variants) with a correspondingly low rate of pathogenic missense variation. While pvs1_gene_context.json documents that GALNT12 germline disease association is supported through an LOF mechanism, this alone does not meet the bar for BP1, which requires a quantitative/gene-specific determination (e.g., via VCEP specification or missense variant pathogenicity rate) that missense changes as a class are not disease-causing in this gene; no such quantitative or VCEP-defined threshold is present in the bundle.

Evidence considered
  • pvs1_gene_context.json: mechanism_rationale and lof_mechanism_supported=true document a truncating/LOF-driven germline disease mechanism, which is suggestive context but insufficient alone (no quantitative missense pathogenicity-rate data) to meet the BP1 bar.
Still missing
  • No VCEP/CSPEC-defined BP1 threshold or gene-specific missense pathogenicity rate for GALNT12 is present in the bundle to confirm missense variation is not a recognized disease mechanism.
  • No gnomAD missense constraint metrics for GALNT12 are present in the bundle.
BP2 Not assessed: no co-occurrence of this variant with a pathogenic variant (in trans or cis) was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No applicable GALNT12-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework is available, so generic ACMG/AMP criteria were used. The case bundle contains no reliable co-occurrence observation showing NM_024642.5:c.460C>T (p.Arg154Trp) with a pathogenic variant in trans or with a pathogenic variant in cis in an affected or unaffected individual, and no phase information is available. Therefore BP2 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP2: observed co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in trans or cis may support benign evidence when the relevant phase, phenotype, and inheritance context are established.
Evidence considered
  • The governing materials report that no GALNT12 CSPEC/VCEP specification was found and that generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria are the fallback framework.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no usable co-occurrence, cis/trans phase, or family-genotype evidence for this variant.
  • The ClinVar record and the reviewed publications do not provide variant-specific, phase-resolved co-occurrence evidence; no final classification from those sources was used to assess BP2.
Still missing
  • No documented co-occurrence observation is available.
  • No pathogenic variant in trans or cis is identified in a case with this variant.
  • No phase-resolved family or sample-level genotype data are provided.
  • The inheritance model and clinical status of any potential co-occurrence individual are not established.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no alternative molecular diagnosis explaining the patient's presentation was documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No evidence was identified that the variant was found in a patient with a clearly established molecular diagnosis of an alternative disease that explains the presentation. The case bundle contains no relevant coexisting molecular diagnosis or clinical alternative-diagnosis documentation, so BP5 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP5 may be considered when a variant is found in a patient with an alternate molecular diagnosis that explains the phenotype; no VCEP specification was available.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no alternative molecular diagnosis or patient-level diagnostic explanation relevant to BP5.
  • The ClinVar condition labels and uncertain-significance submissions do not establish an alternative diagnosis and were not used to infer BP5.
Still missing
  • Confirmed alternative molecular diagnosis explaining the patient's phenotype
  • Documentation that the alternative diagnosis is sufficient to account for the presentation and is not merely a concurrent or nonspecific finding
BP6 Not assessed: no ClinVar expert-panel benign classification exists for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 is not triggered. The exact ClinVar record has no expert-panel submission and all four laboratory submissions classify the variant as uncertain significance. There is no exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification eligible for BP6.

Rule
Apply BP6 only for an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification; exclude ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions.
Evidence considered
  • The exact-match ClinVar audit reports expert_panel_submissions = 0; the aggregate record is Uncertain significance and all four individual submissions are also Uncertain significance.
  • Ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate ClinVar labels, and non-expert assertions were excluded from BP6 by the requested expert-panel-only rule.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification of Benign or Likely benign would be required to assess BP6 under the requested rule
Sources
Not applicable · 4· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense change (p.Arg154Trp), not a null variant, so no nonsense-mediated decay or truncation mechanism applies. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_024642.5:c.460C>T in GALNT12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM4 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense change, so no alteration in protein length occurs. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_024642.5:c.460C>T in GALNT12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense change, not an in-frame indel in a repetitive region. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_024642.5:c.460C>T in GALNT12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense change, not a synonymous variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_024642.5:c.460C>T in GALNT12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
GALNT12
Transcript
NM_024642.5
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_024642.5:c.460C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp)
GRCh38
chr9:98823344 C>T
GRCh37
chr9:101585626 C>T
Location and type
Exon 2 · missense
ClinVar
241514
COSMIC
COSV66663279

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in GALNT12, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_024642.5. Select a row to find it on the plot.

GALNT12NM_024642.5
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 45 / 1,612,678 alleles AF 2.79e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 3.47e-05
gnomAD v2.1 5 / 251,490 alleles AF 1.99e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 2.13e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 2.8e-05 · 45 / 1,612,678 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 3.5e-05
African/African American6 / 75,040 8e-05
Admixed American2 / 60,030 3.3e-05
European (non-Finnish)35 / 1,178,604 3e-05
South Asian2 / 91,042 2.2e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: Remaining individuals, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 2e-05 · 5 / 251,490 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 2.1e-05
African/African American2 / 16,256 0.00012
South Asian1 / 30,616 3.3e-05
European (non-Finnish)2 / 113,766 1.8e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 5 other groups: Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals.

gnomAD-Canada

AF not recorded · ? / ? alleles

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.79039e-05; MAF= 0.00279%, 45/1612678 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 7.99574e-05; MAF= 0.00800%, 6/75040 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 3.467e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.98815e-05; MAF= 0.00199%, 5/251490 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.000123031; MAF= 0.01230%, 2/16256 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.132e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.0001085894233901618, 2/18418 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

Open the gnomAD-Canada detail page →

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -88 bp
0.312
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +7 bp
0.253
SpliceAI donor lossat +81 bp
0.022
SpliceAI donor gainat -89 bp
0.019
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.215
Pangolin splice gain
0.349

Other predictors

REVEL
0.607
BayesDel
0.252

How the predictions were used

PP3 Not met: REVEL score 0.607 falls in the gray zone [0.25-0.75], below the >0.75 PP3 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_024642.5:c.460C>T is a missense substitution (NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp)) in GALNT12. No GALNT12 ClinGen VCEP CSPEC was found for this case (cspec.found=false, gene_vcep_dir=null), so the lab's generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration rule (generic_acmg_combination_rules) applies: for a missense variant, evaluate REVEL only and do not fall back to the SpliceAI-based splice-path rule even though this variant also has a SpliceAI score, and do not combine the two predictors. REVEL score = 0.607 falls within the defined gray zone [0.250-0.750], which is neither the PP3 threshold (>0.750) nor the BP4 threshold (<0.250). Therefore PP3 is not met. BayesDel score (0.252221) exists in evidence but per this pipeline's calibration policy has no verified published threshold and is not used for PP3/BP4. SpliceAI max delta (0.312) is present but is explicitly excluded from consideration for this missense variant per the governing rule, which reserves the SpliceAI path for intronic/synonymous/non-canonical-splice-position variants only.

Rule
generic_acmg_missense_revel_gray_zone
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score = 0.607 (source_registry key 'revel'), which lies within the generic gray zone [0.250, 0.750] defined in generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, so PP3 is not triggered.
  • case_summary.json cspec.found=false and review_manifest.json gene_vcep_dir=null confirm no GALNT12 VCEP CSPEC governs this variant, so the generic ACMG fallback calibration applies.
  • Variant is a missense substitution (p.(Arg154Trp)), so per generic_acmg_classification_rules.md the REVEL-only missense path governs and the SpliceAI-based splice path (which would otherwise indicate delta=0.312 > 0.2) must not be used for this variant type.
Still missing
  • No GALNT12-specific VCEP PP3/BP4 lookup table was found to override the generic REVEL gray-zone call.
  • BayesDel score exists but lacks a verified published calibration threshold in this pipeline and could not be used.
Sources
revelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules
BP4 Not met: REVEL score 0.607 is above the <0.25 BP4 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Same generic ACMG missense-path calibration as PP3: REVEL score = 0.607 is within the gray zone [0.250, 0.750], above the BP4 threshold of <0.250. Therefore BP4 is not met. As with PP3, BayesDel (0.252221) is not a validated predictor for this pipeline and SpliceAI (max delta 0.312) is not applicable because this is a missense variant governed by the REVEL-only rule, not the splice-path rule.

Rule
generic_acmg_missense_revel_gray_zone
Evidence considered
  • REVEL score = 0.607 (source_registry key 'revel') is above the BP4 threshold of <0.250 defined in generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, so BP4 is not triggered.
  • Variant is a missense substitution, so the REVEL-only missense path governs per generic_acmg_classification_rules.md; the SpliceAI splice-path rule (delta=0.312) does not apply to this variant type and cannot be substituted.
Still missing
  • No GALNT12-specific VCEP PP3/BP4 lookup table was found to override the generic REVEL gray-zone call.
  • BayesDel score exists but lacks a verified published calibration threshold in this pipeline and could not be used.
Sources
revelgeneric_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense change, not a synonymous variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_024642.5:c.460C>T in GALNT12 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_078918.3:p.(Arg154Trp). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.31). REVEL score = 0.607. BayesDel score = 0.252221.

2 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    Richards S et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders.
    Karbassi I et al. · 2016
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 26467025 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.79039e-05; MAF= 0.00279%, 45/1612678 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 7.99574e-05; MAF= 0.00800%, 6/75040 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 3.467e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 1.98815e-05; MAF= 0.00199%, 5/251490 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.000123031; MAF= 0.01230%, 2/16256 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.132e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.0001085894233901618, 2/18418 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (4 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 241514)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.31). REVEL score = 0.607. BayesDel score = 0.252221.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV66663279, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.