About PALB2
No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
No variant summary was recorded for this case.
Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. Select a step to read what it means.
Not classified yet.Select a step to read what it means.
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
The recorded framework is ClinGen PALB2 VCEP v1.2.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
This variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is 0%, which is below the PALB2 PM2_Supporting threshold of ≤0.000333%.
This is a missense variant, and the PALB2 expert specification directs BP1 to be applied to all missense variants.
Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v1.2.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule31 (Benign.Supporting >=1 + Pathogenic.Supporting >=1) with applied criteria: BP1 supporting, PM2 supporting; maps to Uncertain Significance - Conflicting Evidence.
Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.
gnomAD v4.1 allele counts were not recorded for this variant.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.010. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.
4 Uncertain significance.
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen PALB2 VCEP v1.2.0, with the data and sources behind each one.
28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 5 not met · 5 not assessed · 16 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
The PALB2 c.3089C>T (p.Thr1030Ile) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar, where the current overall interpretation is uncertain significance, including an expert panel review.
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, and its population frequency is therefore below the PALB2 PM2_Supporting threshold of 0.000333% and well below the BS1 and BA1 thresholds.
In published functional studies, p.(Thr1030Ile) showed abnormal behavior in PALB2 DNA-repair assays, including protein instability, altered interactions within the BRCA2/RAD51C repair complex, marked homologous recombination defects, impaired recruitment to DNA damage sites, cytoplasmic accumulation, and increased PARP inhibitor sensitivity, consistent with a damaging effect.
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below the PALB2 PP3 splicing threshold of 0.2; REVEL is 0.434 and BayesDel is -0.0862002, but the PALB2 expert specification does not use missense in silico scores for PP3/BP4 adjudication.
No criteria match.
Frequency ≤1/300,000 (0.000333%) in gnomAD v4 dataset
Apply to all missense variants
Use PALB2 PVS1 decision tree
Use PALB2 PS1 splicing table
Splicing predicted impact via SpliceAI ≥0.2
Grpmax filtering AF >0.1% in gnomAD v4 dataset
Grpmax filtering AF >0.01% in gnomAD v4 dataset
Case-control studies with p-value ≤0.05 and OR/HR/RR ≥3 or lower 95% CI ≥1.5
AD condition requires LOD ≥0.3 or Bayes factor ≥2:1 for PP1_Supporting, with higher thresholds for stronger levels
LOD ≤ -1.28 or Bayes factor ≤0.053:1 for BS4_Strong; lower tiers also require quantitative evidence
Apply to truncating or qualifying splice variants upstream of p.Tyr1183
Missense: do not use; splicing no impact via SpliceAI ≤0.1, but do not apply for missense variants
Every interpreted variant in PALB2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_024675.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.
| Protein | Location | Classification | Link |
|---|
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Splicing predicted impact via SpliceAI ≥0.2
Missense: do not use; splicing no impact via SpliceAI ≤0.1, but do not apply for missense variants
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.434. BayesDel score = -0.0862002.
8 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.
Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (4 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain Significance by ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 232977)
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.434. BayesDel score = -0.0862002.
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.