0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

RAD51C c.905-19T>C, p.?

NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C NP_478123.1:p.? Unknown · intron 6 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About RAD51C

RAD51C encodes a member of the RAD51 recombinase family that is central to repairing double-stranded DNA breaks via homologous recombination, helping assemble RAD51 filaments and resolve Holliday junctions. Mutations in this gene cause Fanconi anemia complementation group O, and germline mutations increase susceptibility to ovarian cancer and possibly breast cancer. RAD51C acts as a tumor suppressor: it is infrequently mutated in human cancers, but its expression is reduced in a subset of breast tumors, and it resides in a region of chromosome 17 that is frequently amplified in breast cancer.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen RAD51C VCEP v1.0. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met (supporting): gnomAD allele frequency 0.0088% (v2.1) and 0.0057% (v4.1), both below the 0.1% PM2 rarity threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Met (supporting): SpliceAI max delta 0.016, below the <0.1 BP4 threshold, indicating no predicted splice impact.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: only PM2 (supporting) and BP4 (supporting) are met, and one supporting pathogenic criterion opposed by one supporting benign criterion satisfies no ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rule.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
90 / 1,598,884 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 90 / 1,598,884 alleles. Recorded AF 5.62893e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.76687e-05; MAF= 0.00677%, 17/251224 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000140853; MAF= 0.01409%, 16/113594 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.818e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI score
0.016 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.016. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
6 reported laboratory submissions

4 Likely benign · 2 Benign. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
No screenshot for this evidence
Functional evidence
Not recorded

No standalone functional evidence summary is recorded in evidence_summary.functional.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Context only COSMIC ↗
For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen RAD51C VCEP v1.0, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 6 not met · 11 not assessed · 9 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

RAD51C has an official ClinGen VCEP CSPEC (Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer EP, version 1.0), but the case's vcep_materials.json contains no structured rule_payload or extractable criteria text for PVS1/PM4/BP3 (framework_complete=false, rule_payload={}), so generic ACMG/AMP and ClinGen SVI PVS1 (PMC6185798) guidance were used as fallback for this group.

The variant is a deep intronic substitution 19 nucleotides from the nearest exon boundary, outside the canonical +/-1,2 splice consensus, with SpliceAI predicting no significant splicing impact (max delta 0.016). This rules out PVS1 (no null-variant consequence established), PM4 (no protein length change predicted), and BP3 (not an in-frame indel) for this variant.

NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic variant (19 nucleotides upstream of the affected exon) with no protein-level consequence (p.?). All five codon/residue/domain-based criteria in this group (PS1, PM1, PM5, PP2, BP1) are defined specifically for missense/coding variants at a codon position and are therefore not applicable to this variant type. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.02), which is relevant to splicing-specific criteria assessed elsewhere, not to this group.

Reviewed the ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Expert Panel RAD51C specification (v1.0) as the governing framework for PS3/BS3.

Searched the full case-evidence bundle (evidence.json, literature_pass.json, fulltext_map.json, vcep_materials.json) for functional assay evidence (splicing RT-PCR/minigene, HDR/complementation assays) specific to NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C; none was found.

SpliceAI computational prediction (max delta score = 0.016, low) is not a wet-lab functional assay and cannot be used to support PS3 or BS3 under the VCEP framework.

Both PS3 and BS3 are returned as not_assessed due to absence of applicable functional assay evidence.

No RAD51C ClinGen VCEP-specific PP3/BP4 lookup spreadsheet or gene-specific in-silico rule was found in this case's vcep_materials or vcep_db/RAD51C files (rule_payload and criteria.json both empty), so the generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (output/generic_acmg_classification_rules.md) governs PP3/BP4 for this variant.

This variant is a deep intronic substitution (c.905-19T>C), not a missense or canonical +/-1,2 splice-site change, so only the SpliceAI splice-path branch of the generic calibration is applicable; the REVEL missense-path branch is not used.

SpliceAI max delta score = 0.016 falls below the 0.1 BP4 supporting threshold, so BP4 is met (supporting) and PP3 is not met.

BayesDel is never used for PP3/BP4 under this pipeline's policy because no verified published calibration threshold with a citable PMID is available for it.

BP7 does not apply because this variant is not a synonymous coding substitution.

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingMet (supporting): gnomAD allele frequency 0.0088% (v2.1) and 0.0057% (v4.1), both below the 0.1% PM2 rarity threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2_Supporting is met under the generic population-frequency fallback. Although present in gnomAD, the most conservative available filtering allele frequency is 0.008818% (v2.1) and 0.005694% (v4.1), each below 0.1%; this is sufficiently rare for PM2_Supporting. No extractable RAD51C-specific PM2 threshold was present in the retrieved VCEP material.

Rule
Generic population-frequency fallback: PM2_Supporting may be applied when the maximum credible population frequency is <0.1% and no RAD51C-specific threshold is available.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: 17/251,224 alleles (AF 0.006767%), grpmax FAF 0.008818%, with no homozygotes; the highest broad-population AF is 0.014085% in non-Finnish Europeans (16/113,594 alleles).
  • gnomAD v4.1: 90/1,598,884 alleles (AF 0.005629%), grpmax FAF 0.005694%, with no homozygotes; the highest broad-population AF is 0.011292% in Remaining individuals (7/61,992 alleles).
  • The variant is absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
  • The gnomAD v2.1 filtering allele frequency is used conservatively because it is higher than the v4.1 filtering allele frequency.
Sources
BP4 SupportingMet (supporting): SpliceAI max delta 0.016, below the <0.1 BP4 threshold, indicating no predicted splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Applying the generic ACMG/AMP splice-path threshold (no RAD51C VCEP-specific PP3/BP4 spreadsheet available) to this deep intronic variant: SpliceAI max delta score = 0.016, well below the BP4 supporting threshold of <0.1, indicating no predicted splice impact. BP4 is met at supporting strength. REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable here (variant is not missense) and BayesDel is not used under this pipeline's calibration policy regardless of variant type since no verified published threshold/PMID is available.

Rule
generic_acmg_pp3_bp4_splice_path
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.016 (DS_AG=0.0, DS_AL=0.013, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.016), well below the 0.1 BP4 supporting threshold for intronic variants (source: spliceai).
  • Generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (output/generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, source basis PMID:25741868, SVI-recommended SpliceAI thresholds as also reflected in VCEP CSPEC specifications such as ATM's per Walker et al. 2023): SpliceAI max delta <0.1 -> BP4 supporting for intronic/synonymous/non-canonical splice-position variants.
  • BayesDel score for this variant was retrieved (score present in prefetch data) but is not used for PP3/BP4 per this pipeline's policy: no verified published calibration threshold/PMID is available for BayesDel, so it is treated as not_available regardless of the raw score.
  • REVEL is not applicable because this variant is intronic, not missense; REVEL score field returned null/not found in this case's evidence anyway.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PP3 Not met: SpliceAI max delta 0.016, well below the >0.2 PP3 splice-path threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic variant (not a missense substitution and not a canonical +/-1,2 splice consensus change), so per the generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (no RAD51C VCEP-specific PP3/BP4 lookup spreadsheet was retrieved for this gene; vcep_materials and vcep_db/RAD51C contain no gene-specific PP3/BP4 rule payload), only the SpliceAI splice-path threshold applies. SpliceAI max delta score is 0.016, well below the PP3 supporting threshold of >0.2, so PP3 is not met.

Rule
generic_acmg_pp3_bp4_splice_path
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant: DS_AG=0.0, DS_AL=0.013, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.016, max delta score = 0.016 (source: spliceai).
  • Generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (output/generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, cited as generic_acmg_combination_rules, source basis PMID:25741868) specifies for intronic/synonymous/non-canonical-splice-position variants: SpliceAI max delta >0.2 -> PP3, <0.1 -> BP4, [0.1,0.2] gray zone; missense-path REVEL rule does not apply to this intronic variant.
  • No RAD51C VCEP/CSPEC gene-specific PP3/BP4 lookup spreadsheet was found (vcep_materials.summaries empty, vcep_db/RAD51C/criteria.json empty, rule_payload empty in final_classification_framework), so the generic fallback governs.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP5 Not met: no ClinVar expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification exists for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification is present. PP5 is not supported.

Rule
PP5 requires an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic assertion; ordinary laboratory submissions and aggregate ClinVar labels do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 492395 is an exact transcript-level match, but its six submissions are Benign or Likely benign laboratory submissions and the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions.
Sources
BA1 Not met: highest gnomAD allele frequency 0.0088%, far below the >1% BA1 stand-alone benign threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The highest available filtering allele frequency is 0.008818% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.005694% in gnomAD v4.1, far below the generic BA1 stand-alone benign threshold of >1%. No extractable RAD51C-specific BA1 threshold was present in the retrieved VCEP material.

Rule
Generic population-frequency fallback: BA1 requires allele frequency >1% in a relevant population dataset.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C VCEP material identifies the RAD51C disease contexts but contains no criterion-level rule payload or population-frequency thresholds; generic population thresholds were therefore used.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 17/251,224 alleles (AF 0.006767%; grpmax FAF 0.008818%) and no homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 90/1,598,884 alleles (AF 0.005629%; grpmax FAF 0.005694%) and no homozygotes.
Sources
BS1 Not met: highest observed gnomAD allele frequency 0.038% (NFE_SWE subset), below the >0.3% BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The maximum observed population frequency is 0.038364% in the small NFE_SWE subset of gnomAD v2.1 (10/26,066 alleles), while the v2.1 grpmax FAF is 0.008818% and v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.005694%; all are below the generic BS1 threshold of >0.3%. No extractable RAD51C-specific BS1 threshold was present in the retrieved VCEP material.

Rule
Generic population-frequency fallback: BS1 requires allele frequency >0.3%, exceeding that expected for a pathogenic RAD51C allele.
Evidence considered
  • The v2.1 highest raw subpopulation AF (NFE_SWE, 10/26,066 = 0.038364%) is based on a limited allele count and remains below 0.3%; the cohort-wide v2.1 grpmax FAF is 0.008818%.
  • gnomAD v4.1 has a cohort-wide grpmax FAF of 0.005694%; its highest reported broad subpopulation AF is 0.011292% in Remaining individuals (7/61,992 alleles).
  • No homozygotes were reported in either gnomAD release.
Sources
BS2 Not met: gnomAD reports zero homozygotes and no disease-free carrier phenotype is established. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not met. gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 each report zero homozygotes. Moreover, the available population records do not establish phenotype, age, or disease-free status for carriers; therefore, healthy-adult observations required for BS2 are absent.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS2: observed in a healthy adult individual for a disorder expected to be fully penetrant at an early age; neither the required healthy-adult observation nor homozygote observation is available here.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports zero homozygotes among 17 alternate alleles, and gnomAD v4.1 reports zero homozygotes among 90 alternate alleles.
  • Population-database carrier counts alone do not document that an individual is unaffected at an age informative for RAD51C-associated hereditary cancer predisposition.
Still missing
  • No genotype-confirmed healthy-adult or unaffected-carrier dataset with phenotype and age information was provided.
Sources
BP6 Not met: no ClinVar expert-panel benign or likely benign classification exists for this exact variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification is present. BP6 is not supported.

Rule
BP6 requires an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion; ordinary laboratory submissions and aggregate ClinVar labels do not qualify.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 492395 is an exact transcript-level match, but all six submissions are single-submitter laboratory assertions and the submission audit reports zero expert-panel submissions.
Sources

Not assessed · 11 · no assessment recorded

PS2 Not assessed: no de novo observation or parental-testing data were available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: no proband-level parental testing, parentage confirmation, phenotype information, or de novo observation is present in the consolidated case-evidence bundle.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS2: de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history, with maternity and paternity confirmed.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC record has an empty criteria payload; it supplies no usable gene-specific PS2 rule, so the generic ACMG/AMP definition was used.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no proband observation, parental genotypes, parentage testing, phenotype, or de novo report for this variant.
Still missing
  • Obtain the proband genotype and phenotype.
  • Obtain testing of both biological parents for NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C, including confirmation of parentage and assessment for parental mosaicism if absent in blood.
  • Establish whether the proband phenotype is specific and consistent with a RAD51C-associated disorder before assigning de novo evidence.
Sources
PS3 Not assessed: no validated functional assay data (splicing minigene, RT-PCR, or HDR assay) were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No functional assay data (splicing minigene/RT-PCR, HDR/complementation assay, or other validated functional study) for NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is present anywhere in the case evidence bundle (evidence.json, literature_pass.json, fulltext_map.json). The ClinGen HBOP VCEP RAD51C specification (v1.0) supports PS3/BS3 only via validated splicing or homology-directed repair (HDR) assays with appropriate controls; none were located for this variant. SpliceAI is a computational predictor, not a functional assay, and does not satisfy PS3/BS3.

Still missing
  • No published or cited RNA/splicing functional assay (RT-PCR, minigene) for this variant
  • No published HDR/complementation functional assay for this variant
  • No functional data located in ClinVar submissions or cited literature (PMID:25741868, PMID:25085752, PMID:25394175, PMID:20301575, PMID:28492532) specific to this variant
PS4 Not assessed: no case-control or statistical enrichment evidence for this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-control or other statistically valid enrichment evidence for NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C was retrieved. ClinVar submitter classifications are not case-control data and were not used to infer PS4.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PS4: prevalence in affected individuals must be significantly increased compared with controls; no usable enrichment dataset was retrieved.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC identifies hereditary breast/ovarian cancer and Fanconi anemia disease contexts but contains no extracted PS4 rule payload or case-control threshold.
  • The exact ClinVar record contains laboratory submissions only; it supplies no case/control counts, odds ratio, confidence interval, or enrichment statistic for this variant.
Still missing
  • A variant-specific, phenotype-defined case-control dataset or adequately powered enrichment analysis with control counts and statistical results is required.
Sources
PM3 Not assessed: no biallelic observation or second pathogenic/likely pathogenic RAD51C variant was reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM3 cannot be evaluated: the case bundle contains no affected individual with this variant, no second RAD51C variant classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and no phase evidence. Although the retrieved RAD51C specification identifies autosomal-recessive Fanconi anemia as a RAD51C disease context, no phenotype or biallelic observation relevant to that disorder is provided.

Rule
No explicit RAD51C PM3 specification was retrieved. Under generic ACMG/AMP use, PM3 requires observation with a pathogenic variant in trans in an affected individual with a recessive disorder; this evidence is absent.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC framework lists autosomal-dominant familial ovarian cancer and hereditary breast carcinoma, and autosomal-recessive Fanconi anemia. The bundle supplies no proband-level genotype, phenotype, companion-variant, or phase data for the submitted variant.
Still missing
  • An affected proband with a phenotype compatible with autosomal-recessive RAD51C-related Fanconi anemia.
  • A confirmed pathogenic/likely pathogenic RAD51C variant in the same individual and validated trans phase (or adequate phase inference).
  • The companion variant's classification and the observation-level evidence needed to assign PM3 strength.
Sources
PM6 Not assessed: no reported de novo occurrence or parental testing was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: no reported de novo occurrence or parental testing is available. PM6 cannot be assigned merely because parental data are absent.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PM6: assumed de novo occurrence in a patient with the disease and no family history when maternity and paternity are not confirmed.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC record has an empty criteria payload; it supplies no usable gene-specific PM6 rule, so the generic ACMG/AMP definition was used.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no proband observation, parental genotypes, parentage testing, phenotype, or de novo report for this variant.
Still missing
  • Obtain the proband genotype and phenotype.
  • Obtain testing of both biological parents for NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C.
  • If the variant is absent from both parents, document whether parentage has been confirmed and evaluate phenotype consistency.
Sources
PP1 Not assessed: no segregation data from informative relatives were reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: no informative relatives, disease statuses, genotypes, pedigrees, or count of independent segregations are reported for this variant.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP1: co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease; strength may increase with additional segregation data.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC record has an empty criteria payload; it supplies no usable gene-specific PP1 rule, so the generic ACMG/AMP definition was used.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family-level genotypes, phenotypes, pedigree data, or meiosis count for this variant.
Still missing
  • Obtain a pedigree with affected and unaffected relatives, their relevant diagnoses and ages.
  • Genotype informative relatives for NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C and document the number of informative meioses.
  • Assess whether affected-relative phenotypes are consistent with the RAD51C-associated condition under evaluation.
Sources
PP4 Not assessed: no phenotype or personal/family cancer history was provided for the tested individual. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No phenotype, personal/family cancer history, or phenotype-specificity analysis for the tested individual was provided. Therefore, phenotype specificity for a RAD51C-associated condition cannot be assessed.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP PP4: the patient's phenotype or family history must be highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology; the necessary patient data are absent.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC lists familial ovarian cancer, hereditary breast carcinoma, and Fanconi anemia as disease contexts, but no patient phenotype accompanies this variant record.
Still missing
  • Phenotypic and family-history data for the tested individual, including the relevant RAD51C-associated disease context, are required.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no validated functional assay with normal-range results was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No functional assay data (splicing minigene/RT-PCR, HDR/complementation assay, or other validated functional study) for NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is present anywhere in the case evidence bundle. The ClinGen HBOP VCEP RAD51C specification supports BS3 only via validated functional assays with normal-range results and appropriate controls; none were located. SpliceAI's low predicted delta score (max 0.016) is a computational prediction, not functional assay evidence, so it cannot be used to meet BS3.

Still missing
  • No functional assay (splicing or HDR) with normal/wild-type-like results reported for this variant
  • No cited literature source provides direct functional characterization of this specific variant
BS4 Not assessed: no affected non-carrier or unaffected carrier observations were reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: no informative affected non-carrier or unaffected carrier observations, family phenotypes, or segregation data are reported for this variant.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BS4: lack of segregation in affected members of a family.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC record has an empty criteria payload; it supplies no usable gene-specific BS4 rule, so the generic ACMG/AMP definition was used.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family-level genotypes, phenotypes, or reported non-segregation observations for this variant.
Still missing
  • Obtain a pedigree and genotype-phenotype data for informative relatives.
  • Document any unequivocal non-segregation, including affected non-carriers or unaffected carriers, while accounting for age-related penetrance and phenocopies.
Sources
BP2 Not assessed: no co-occurrence data with a pathogenic RAD51C variant, or cis/trans phase, were reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP2 cannot be evaluated because the bundle provides no individual-level co-occurrence data for this variant with a RAD51C pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, no cis/trans phase, and no phenotype or penetrance context. Aggregate ClinVar classifications are not co-occurrence evidence and were not used to infer BP2.

Rule
No explicit RAD51C BP2 specification was retrieved. Under generic ACMG/AMP use, BP2 requires a documented co-occurrence with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in cis or in trans in an appropriate dominant-disease context; this evidence is absent.
Evidence considered
  • The retrieved RAD51C CSPEC framework identifies both autosomal-dominant cancer-predisposition and autosomal-recessive Fanconi-anemia disease contexts. No co-occurrence or phase observation for NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is present in the case bundle.
Still missing
  • A documented co-occurring pathogenic/likely pathogenic RAD51C variant in the same individual.
  • Validated cis or trans phase for the two variants.
  • Phenotype, disease context, and penetrance information sufficient to determine whether the co-occurrence is incompatible with the relevant RAD51C disease mechanism.
Sources
BP5 Not assessed: no evidence of an alternative molecular diagnosis was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No evidence was retrieved that the individual's phenotype is explained by an alternative molecular diagnosis, and no phenotype was supplied for such an assessment.

Rule
Generic ACMG/AMP BP5: a variant may support benignity when a different molecular diagnosis fully explains the patient's phenotype; this evidence was not provided.
Evidence considered
  • The consolidated case evidence contains no patient phenotype and no alternative molecular diagnosis or co-occurrence assessment.
Still missing
  • A phenotype-correlated alternative molecular diagnosis demonstrating that it fully explains the observed presentation is required.
Not applicable · 9· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: a deep intronic change 19 bp upstream of the splice acceptor is not a canonical splice-site or other null variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic substitution located 19 nucleotides upstream of the exon 5 3' splice acceptor site. It does not fall within the canonical splice consensus positions (+1,+2 donor or -1,-2 acceptor), so it is not a null variant by nonsense, frameshift, initiation-codon, or canonical splice-site mechanism per the ClinGen SVI PVS1 decision framework (PMC6185798). The RAD51C gene-level PVS1 gate is eligible (loss-of-function is an established germline disease mechanism per literature review, e.g. PMID:20400963 describing biallelic RAD51C LOF causing a Fanconi anemia-like disorder), but the variant itself does not meet any PVS1 null-variant category, so PVS1 is not applicable to this specific variant regardless of gene eligibility. In silico splice prediction (SpliceAI) further supports no meaningful splicing disruption: max delta score = 0.016 (DS_AG=0.0, DS_AL=0.013, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.016), far below the ~0.2 threshold conventionally used to flag a possible splice-altering effect, consistent with no exon skipping or intron retention predicted and therefore no basis for a PVS1_moderate/PVS1_supporting near-splice-site downgrade pathway either.

Rule
generic_acmg_pvs1_svi_pmc6185798
Evidence considered
  • pvs1_variant_assessment.json: consequence_class='unknown', canonical_splice_consensus=false, variant_bucket='other', apply_generic_pvs1_framework=false; rationale states the variant does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice consensus variants.
  • SpliceAI Lookup evidence_sentence: 'SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02)' with detailed scores DS_AG=0.0, DS_AL=0.013, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.016, max_delta=0.016.
  • pvs1_gene_context.json confirms RAD51C LOF is an established germline disease mechanism (pvs1_gene_gate='eligible') based on literature including PMID:20400963, but gene-level eligibility alone does not satisfy PVS1 without a qualifying null-variant consequence at the variant level.
  • No official RAD51C VCEP CSPEC PVS1 rule payload was available in vcep_materials.json (rule_payload empty, framework_complete=false); generic ACMG/ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798) was used as fallback per case framework_mode='vcep' with no structured PVS1 sub-rules extracted.
Still missing
  • No RNA/splicing functional assay (e.g. minigene, patient RNA) was found in the evidence bundle to directly confirm absence of aberrant splicing beyond in silico SpliceAI prediction.
Sources
pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentspliceai ↗pvs1_generic_framework ↗
PS1 N/ANot applicable: PS1 requires the same amino acid change as an established pathogenic variant, undefined for a non-coding intronic substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic variant (19 bp upstream of exon start) with no resulting amino acid change; normalization confirms protein_3l/protein_1l = NP_478123.1:p.? and variant_class is null. PS1 requires the same amino acid change as an established pathogenic variant, which is not a defined concept for a non-coding intronic substitution.

Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json normalization block shows protein_3l/protein_1l = NP_478123.1:p.? and variant_class: null, confirming no missense/protein-level consequence to evaluate for PS1.
PM1 N/ANot applicable: PM1 requires a missense change in a mutational hotspot; this variant is intronic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM1 applies to missense variants located in a mutational hotspot or well-established functional domain without benign variation. This variant is intronic (c.905-19T>C) with no codon/residue position, so PM1 is not a defined concept here.

Evidence considered
  • Variant is intronic with no protein position (p.?), so no codon or domain mapping applies.
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 requires an in-frame indel or stop-loss change; this is an intronic substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants that change protein length without altering the reading frame. NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic single-nucleotide substitution with no predicted amino acid change (protein_1l/protein_3l = 'NP_478123.1:p.?', i.e. no coding consequence assigned), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing disruption (max delta 0.016), so there is no basis to infer any protein length alteration via exon skipping or intron retention. PM4 is not applicable.

Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json normalization: protein_3l/protein_1l = 'NP_478123.1:p.?' indicating no coding/protein-length consequence is assigned to this intronic variant.
  • SpliceAI evidence_sentence confirms no significant splice impact (max delta score = 0.016), removing any plausible mechanism for an in-frame protein length change via splicing disruption.
Sources
PM5 N/ANot applicable: PM5 requires a missense change at a residue with an established pathogenic variant; no residue is altered here. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 requires a different missense change at the same residue previously established as pathogenic. This variant does not alter any codon/residue, so PM5 cannot be assessed.

Evidence considered
  • No residue/codon is affected by this deep intronic substitution.
PP2 N/ANot applicable: PP2 applies only to missense variants; this variant produces no missense change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 applies to missense variants in genes where missense is a common mechanism of disease and benign missense variation is rare. This variant produces no missense change, so PP2 does not apply.

Evidence considered
  • Variant is intronic (c.905-19T>C), not a missense substitution.
BP1 N/ANot applicable: BP1 applies only to missense variants in genes where truncation is the primary mechanism. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 applies to missense variants in a gene where truncating variants are the primary disease mechanism (benign for missense-only presentation). This variant is not missense, so BP1 does not apply.

Evidence considered
  • Variant is intronic and produces no amino acid substitution, so the missense-specific BP1 criterion is not a defined concept for it.
BP3 N/ANot applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repetitive region; this is an intronic substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known functional impact. NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a single-nucleotide substitution in a deep intronic (non-repeat-annotated) region, not an in-frame indel, and no repeat-region context was identified in the evidence bundle. BP3 is not applicable to this variant type.

Evidence considered
  • Variant is a single-nucleotide substitution (c.905-19T>C), not an insertion/deletion, so the BP3 criterion (in-frame indel in a repetitive/non-critical region) does not apply by variant type.
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies only to synonymous coding variants; this is a deep intronic change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) coding variants predicted to have no splicing impact. NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic variant (19 bp upstream of the exon boundary, protein consequence NP_478123.1:p.?), not a synonymous coding change, so BP7 does not apply regardless of the SpliceAI result.

Evidence considered
  • Variant normalization shows NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is an intronic substitution with predicted protein consequence NP_478123.1:p.? (not a synonymous substitution), so BP7's synonymous-variant scope is not met.

Identifiers

Gene
RAD51C
Transcript
NM_058216.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_478123.1:p.?
GRCh38
chr17:58724021 T>C
GRCh37
chr17:56801382 T>C
Location and type
Intron 6 · unknown
ClinVar
492395

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in RAD51C, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_058216.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

RAD51CNM_058216.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 90 / 1,598,884 alleles AF 5.63e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 5.69e-05
gnomAD v2.1 17 / 251,224 alleles AF 6.77e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 8.82e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 5.6e-05 · 90 / 1,598,884 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 5.7e-05
Remaining individuals7 / 61,992 0.00011
European (non-Finnish)81 / 1,166,312 6.9e-05
European (Finnish)2 / 64,014 3.1e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: Admixed American, Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 6.8e-05 · 17 / 251,224 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 8.8e-05
European (non-Finnish)16 / 113,594 0.00014
European (Finnish)1 / 21,628 4.6e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 5.62893e-05; MAF= 0.00563%, 90/1598884 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000112918; MAF= 0.01129%, 7/61992 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 5.694e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.76687e-05; MAF= 0.00677%, 17/251224 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000140853; MAF= 0.01409%, 16/113594 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.818e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -3 bp
0.013
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -113 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat +79 bp
0.016
SpliceAI donor gainat +19 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.009
Pangolin splice gain
0.004

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingMet (supporting): SpliceAI max delta 0.016, below the <0.1 BP4 threshold, indicating no predicted splice impact. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Applying the generic ACMG/AMP splice-path threshold (no RAD51C VCEP-specific PP3/BP4 spreadsheet available) to this deep intronic variant: SpliceAI max delta score = 0.016, well below the BP4 supporting threshold of <0.1, indicating no predicted splice impact. BP4 is met at supporting strength. REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable here (variant is not missense) and BayesDel is not used under this pipeline's calibration policy regardless of variant type since no verified published threshold/PMID is available.

Rule
generic_acmg_pp3_bp4_splice_path
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta score = 0.016 (DS_AG=0.0, DS_AL=0.013, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.016), well below the 0.1 BP4 supporting threshold for intronic variants (source: spliceai).
  • Generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (output/generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, source basis PMID:25741868, SVI-recommended SpliceAI thresholds as also reflected in VCEP CSPEC specifications such as ATM's per Walker et al. 2023): SpliceAI max delta <0.1 -> BP4 supporting for intronic/synonymous/non-canonical splice-position variants.
  • BayesDel score for this variant was retrieved (score present in prefetch data) but is not used for PP3/BP4 per this pipeline's policy: no verified published calibration threshold/PMID is available for BayesDel, so it is treated as not_available regardless of the raw score.
  • REVEL is not applicable because this variant is intronic, not missense; REVEL score field returned null/not found in this case's evidence anyway.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI max delta 0.016, well below the >0.2 PP3 splice-path threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic variant (not a missense substitution and not a canonical +/-1,2 splice consensus change), so per the generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (no RAD51C VCEP-specific PP3/BP4 lookup spreadsheet was retrieved for this gene; vcep_materials and vcep_db/RAD51C contain no gene-specific PP3/BP4 rule payload), only the SpliceAI splice-path threshold applies. SpliceAI max delta score is 0.016, well below the PP3 supporting threshold of >0.2, so PP3 is not met.

Rule
generic_acmg_pp3_bp4_splice_path
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant: DS_AG=0.0, DS_AL=0.013, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.016, max delta score = 0.016 (source: spliceai).
  • Generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (output/generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, cited as generic_acmg_combination_rules, source basis PMID:25741868) specifies for intronic/synonymous/non-canonical-splice-position variants: SpliceAI max delta >0.2 -> PP3, <0.1 -> BP4, [0.1,0.2] gray zone; missense-path REVEL rule does not apply to this intronic variant.
  • No RAD51C VCEP/CSPEC gene-specific PP3/BP4 lookup spreadsheet was found (vcep_materials.summaries empty, vcep_db/RAD51C/criteria.json empty, rule_payload empty in final_classification_framework), so the generic fallback governs.
Sources
spliceai ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies only to synonymous coding variants; this is a deep intronic change. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) coding variants predicted to have no splicing impact. NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is a deep intronic variant (19 bp upstream of the exon boundary, protein consequence NP_478123.1:p.?), not a synonymous coding change, so BP7 does not apply regardless of the SpliceAI result.

Evidence considered
  • Variant normalization shows NM_058216.3:c.905-19T>C is an intronic substitution with predicted protein consequence NP_478123.1:p.? (not a synonymous substitution), so BP7's synonymous-variant scope is not met.

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

5 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    Richards S et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Fanconi Anemia.
    Adam MP et al. · 1993
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20301575 ↗
  • Development and validation of a new algorithm for the reclassification of genetic variants identified in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
    Pruss D et al. · 2014
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25085752 ↗
  • A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
    Hampel H et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25394175 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    Nykamp K et al. · 2017
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 5.62893e-05; MAF= 0.00563%, 90/1598884 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000112918; MAF= 0.01129%, 7/61992 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 5.694e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 6.76687e-05; MAF= 0.00677%, 17/251224 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000140853; MAF= 0.01409%, 16/113594 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 8.818e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (4 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (2 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 492395)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).

Somatic

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).