0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

DICER1 c.2536A>G, p.(Ile846Val)

NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val) Missense · exon 16 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About DICER1

DICER1 encodes an enzyme that processes RNA into small silencing RNAs and microRNAs, which regulate gene expression after transcription. Germline mutations in DICER1 cause DICER1-related disorders, a familial tumor susceptibility syndrome that increases the risk of pleuropulmonary blastoma, cystic nephroma, rhabdomyosarcoma, multinodular goiter, and ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. DICER1 acts as a tumor suppressor, and loss or reduced activity of the protein is linked to cancer development and poorer outcomes in several cancer types, including lung, breast, and ovarian cancers.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen DICER1 VCEP v1.4. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Met (Supporting): REVEL 0.191 is below the <0.500 threshold and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta 0.029).

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: under the DICER1 VCEP v1.4 point framework only BP4 Supporting (-1 pt) was met; the total of -1 falls in Rule 3 (-1 to +5), giving Uncertain Significance.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
50 / 1,613,432 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 50 / 1,613,432 alleles. Recorded AF 3.09898e-05. Recorded homozygote count 0.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.98159e-05; MAF= 0.00398%, 10/251156 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 8.67253e-05; MAF= 0.00867%, 3/34592 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.858e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.191 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.191. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
6 reported laboratory submissions

5 Uncertain significance · 1 Likely benign. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, conflicting classifications.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. DICER1, an endoribonuclease, is altered in various cancer types.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
1 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV100601996, n = 1 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen DICER1 VCEP v1.4, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 1 met · 5 not met · 11 not assessed · 11 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

Variant NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G / NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val) is a missense single-nucleotide substitution outside the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846) and outside the defined repeat regions (p.D606-p.D609; p.E1418-p.E1420; p.E1422-p.E1425).

PVS1 is scoped by the DICER1 VCEP to null variants (nonsense/frameshift with NMD prediction, canonical splice +/-1,2) and does not apply to missense changes.

PM4 is scoped by the DICER1 VCEP to in-frame indels causing protein length change and does not apply to a missense substitution with no length change.

BP3 is explicitly designated Not Applicable in the DICER1 VCEP cSpec v1.4 for this gene.

Governing framework: ClinGen DICER1 and miRNA-Processing Gene Expert Panel Specifications v1.4 (cspec), used in place of generic ACMG for all five criteria in this group.

PP2 and BP1 are hard-coded Not Applicable by the DICER1 VCEP for this gene.

PM1 is not met because p.Ile846 falls outside the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846) and is not one of the seven metal ion-binding hotspot codons defined by the VCEP.

PS1 and PM5 could not be assessed because the automated same-residue/same-change comparator search (pm5_candidates.json) failed due to an HTTP 429 rate-limit error before a full candidate set could be harvested; this is a data-completeness gap, not a negative finding.

No functional (in vitro pre-miRNA cleavage) or splicing/RNA assay data specific to NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G (p.Ile846Val) exists in the case evidence bundle or in the retrieved literature set.

SpliceAI in silico prediction (max delta 0.029, no significant splice impact) is computational evidence relevant to PP3/BP4, not PS3/BS3, which per the DICER1 VCEP require actual functional assay data.

Both PS3 and BS3 are returned as not_assessed pending availability of a variant-specific functional or RNA assay.

Governing framework: ClinGen DICER1 and miRNA-Processing Gene Expert Panel CSpec v1.4, which pre-specifies REVEL cutoffs (>=0.750 for PP3, <0.500 for BP4) plus splicing-predictor concordance (MaxEntScan/SpliceAI) for missense variants, applied directly as required.

Variant NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G / NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val) is missense: REVEL = 0.191 (well below 0.500) and SpliceAI max delta = 0.029 (no splice impact predicted) jointly satisfy the VCEP BP4 Supporting rule; PP3 is not met since neither the REVEL >=0.750 nor a splicing-effect prediction threshold is met.

BayesDel score (-0.329637) was retrieved but not used for PP3/BP4 adjudication: no verified published calibration threshold for BayesDel is available to this pipeline, so it is treated as insufficiently calibrated evidence per standing policy, independent of the VCEP's REVEL-based rule.

BP7 is not applicable because the variant is missense, not silent/synonymous or intronic/non-coding, which is the sole scope of the VCEP's BP7 rule.

Met · 1

BP4 SupportingMet (Supporting): REVEL 0.191 is below the <0.500 threshold and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta 0.029). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Per ClinGen DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4, BP4 (Supporting) applies to missense variants with REVEL < 0.500 and agreement in splicing predictors that no splicing effect is predicted. Local REVEL score is 0.191, well under the 0.500 threshold. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.029, far below the actionable ~0.2 range), consistent with 'no splicing effects predicted.' MaxEntScan output was not separately computed in this case bundle, but SpliceAI (the VCEP's primary splice-impact tool, applicable per the VCEP's own instructionsToUse for scores outside/without a MaxEntScan-flagged region) shows no splicing signal, and this missense substitution does not fall in a canonical splice region requiring MES cross-check. Both REVEL and splicing-predictor prongs of the VCEP BP4 rule are satisfied; BP4 Supporting applies.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP4: missense REVEL < 0.500 and splicing-predictor agreement on no splicing effect
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP4 rule: 'For missense variants, REVEL score < 0.500 and agreement in splicing predictors that no splicing effects are predicted.'
  • Local REVEL v1.3 lookup: score = 0.191 for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G, below the 0.500 benign-supporting threshold specified by the VCEP.
  • SpliceAI Lookup: max delta score = 0.029 (DS_AG=0.002, DS_AL=0.029, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.008), indicating no predicted splicing impact, consistent with the 'no splicing effects predicted' component of the VCEP BP4 rule.
  • REVEL score calibration for the 0.5 boundary is supported by the ClinGen SVI-endorsed calibration in Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID 36413997).
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM1 Not met: residue 846 lies outside the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846), the only region where the VCEP applies PM1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP specifies PM1 applies only to missense variants within the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846): Moderate for the seven metal ion-binding hotspot codons (p.S1344, p.E1705, p.D1709, p.D1713, p.G1809, p.D1810, p.E1813) and Supporting for other RNase IIIb domain residues. The variant under evaluation, p.(Ile846Val), affects residue 846, which lies well outside the RNase IIIb domain (1682-1846) and is not one of the metal-binding hotspot codons. No VCEP-recognized structural/functional hotspot or domain criterion is met at this residue.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP v1.4 PM1: Moderate for metal ion-binding hotspot codons; Supporting for other RNase IIIb domain residues (p.Y1682-p.S1846).
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 cspec v1.4 PM1 rule: 'Putative missense variants at residues affecting metal ion-binding: codons p.S1344, p.E1705, p.D1709, p.D1713, p.G1809, p.D1810, p.E1813' (Moderate) and 'Putative missense variants at residues in the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846), besides the metal ion-binding residues' (Supporting).
  • Variant residue is p.Ile846, numerically and structurally outside the RNase IIIb domain boundary (p.Y1682-p.S1846) and not among the listed hotspot codons.
Sources
PM2 Not met: gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 3.1e-05 (50/1,613,432 alleles) exceeds the required <0.000005 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is not met. The DICER1 VCEP requires allele frequency <0.000005 across gnomAD, no more than one allele in any subpopulation, and at least 20x coverage. gnomAD v4.1 reports 50/1,613,432 total alleles (AF 3.0990e-05), with 3/60,004 alleles in the highest-frequency subpopulation; these observations exceed both the overall frequency and per-subpopulation allele-count requirements.

Rule
Allele frequency <0.000005 across gnomAD with no more than one allele in any subpopulation and at least 20x coverage.
Evidence considered
  • The ClinGen DICER1 VCEP specification version 1.4 defines PM2 Supporting as allele frequency <0.000005 across gnomAD, with no more than one allele in any subpopulation and at least 20x coverage; it instructs reviewers to use the most recent/most comprehensive gnomAD version in general.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 50 alternate alleles among 1,613,432 total alleles (AF 3.09898e-05), 3 alternate alleles among 60,004 Admixed American alleles, and zero homozygotes; the frequency and allele-count observations fail the PM2 rule.
  • gnomAD v2.1 independently reports 10 alternate alleles among 251,156 total alleles (AF 3.98159e-05) and 3 alternate alleles among 34,592 Admixed American alleles, also inconsistent with PM2.
Sources
PP3 Not met: REVEL 0.191 is far below the >=0.750 threshold, and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta 0.029). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Variant is missense (NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val)). Per ClinGen DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4, PP3 (Supporting) requires REVEL >= 0.750 OR agreement in splicing predictors predicting a splicing effect. Local REVEL lookup gives 0.191, far below the 0.750 threshold. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score = 0.029, well below the conventional 0.2 SpliceAI actionable threshold), so there is no splicing-predictor support for a deleterious effect either. Neither prong of the VCEP PP3 rule is satisfied.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 PP3: missense REVEL >= 0.750 OR splicing-predictor agreement on splicing effect
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 PP3 rule: 'For missense variants, REVEL score >= 0.750 OR agreement in splicing predictors predict splicing effects.'
  • Local REVEL v1.3 lookup: score = 0.191 for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G (chr14 zip lookup), well below the 0.750 pathogenic-supporting threshold specified by the VCEP.
  • SpliceAI Lookup (broadinstitute) scores: DS_AG=0.002, DS_AL=0.029, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.008; max delta score = 0.029, indicating no predicted splicing effect.
Sources
BA1 Not met: highest gnomAD subpopulation frequency is 5.0e-05 (Admixed American, 3/60,004), far below the >0.003 BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The DICER1 VCEP requires a gnomAD subpopulation frequency greater than 0.003, with more than 2,000 alleles tested and at least 5 alternate alleles. In the most recent/comprehensive available dataset, gnomAD v4.1, the highest subpopulation frequency is 4.9997e-05 in Admixed American (3/60,004 alleles), far below 0.003.

Rule
Frequency >0.003 (0.3%) in gnomAD subpopulations. Subpopulations must have >2,000 alleles tested and a minimum of 5 alleles present.
Evidence considered
  • The ClinGen DICER1 VCEP specification version 1.4 defines BA1 as frequency >0.003 in a gnomAD subpopulation, requiring >2,000 alleles tested and at least 5 alleles present.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the highest observed subpopulation frequency as 4.9997e-05 in Admixed American, based on 3 alternate alleles among 60,004 tested alleles; this is below the BA1 threshold.
Sources
BS1 Not met: highest gnomAD subpopulation frequency 5.0e-05 does not reach the >0.0003 BS1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The DICER1 VCEP requires a frequency greater than 0.0003 in a gnomAD subpopulation, with more than 2,000 alleles tested and at least 5 alternate alleles. The highest gnomAD v4.1 subpopulation frequency is 4.9997e-05 in Admixed American (3/60,004 alleles), and therefore does not reach the threshold. The gnomAD v2.1 subpopulation maximum is also below 0.0003.

Rule
Frequency >0.0003 (0.03%) in gnomAD subpopulations. Subpopulations must have >2,000 alleles tested and a minimum of 5 alleles present.
Evidence considered
  • The ClinGen DICER1 VCEP specification version 1.4 defines BS1 as frequency >0.0003 in a gnomAD subpopulation, requiring >2,000 alleles tested and at least 5 alleles present.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports a maximum subpopulation frequency of 4.9997e-05 in Admixed American, based on 3 alternate alleles among 60,004 tested alleles; this is below the BS1 threshold.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports a maximum subpopulation frequency of 1.3965e-04 in the AMR_XY subgroup, based on 2 alternate alleles among 14,322 tested alleles; this is also below 0.0003 and does not meet the minimum of 5 alternate alleles.
Sources

Not assessed · 11 · no assessment recorded

PS1 Not assessed: no DICER1 VCEP-asserted pathogenic variant producing the same p.Ile846Val amino acid change was available for comparison. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 (DICER1 VCEP v1.4) requires identifying another variant with the same amino acid change (p.Ile846Val) that has been asserted pathogenic (not likely pathogenic) by the ClinGen DICER1 VCEP, with splicing ruled out. The PM5 comparator harvesting artifact (pm5_candidates.json) attempted this search but failed softly with an HTTP 429 (Too Many Requests) error, returning 0 same-residue candidates out of only 3 candidates seen before the search was interrupted. No usable comparator data exists to adjudicate PS1 in either direction.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP v1.4 PS1: For same AA change, must confirm no difference in splicing (RNA data or concordant MaxEntScan/SpliceAI); comparator must be asserted pathogenic (not likely pathogenic) by ClinGen DICER1 VCEP.
Evidence considered
  • pm5_candidates.json reports eligible_for_classic_pm5_search=true, candidate_summary.same_residue_candidates=0, total_candidates_seen=3, with errors=['HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests'] and warning 'PM5 candidate harvesting failed softly'.
  • Variant under evaluation is NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val), residue I846, well outside the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846) defined by the DICER1 VCEP, so any PS1 comparator would also need independent verification of domain/mechanism relevance.
Still missing
  • Same-amino-acid-change comparator search (ClinVar for p.Ile846Val classified pathogenic by DICER1 VCEP) was rate-limited (HTTP 429) and did not complete; needs re-run to confirm presence/absence of a qualifying comparator.
Sources
pm5_candidates
PS2 Not assessed: no de novo observation with confirmed maternity and paternity was available to score PS2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing DICER1 specification makes PS2 applicable and requires tallying de novo points from proband-level evidence, with both maternity and paternity confirmed. The case-evidence bundle contains no proband-specific de novo observation, parental genotypes, maternity/paternity confirmation, or de novo point assignment for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G (p.Ile846Val). Therefore PS2 cannot be assessed.

Rule
De novo points should be tallied using the simplified table for tallying proband points. Strength: Very Strong for ≥4 points; Strong for ≥2 but <4 points; Moderate for ≥1 but <2 points; Supporting for ≥0.5 but <1 point.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 and miRNA-Processing Gene Specification, version 1.4, states that PS2 is applicable, that de novo points should be tallied using the proband point table, and that the panel uses PS2 exclusively rather than PM6 for de novo evidence.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle provides variant normalization and general database/literature results but no case-level parental testing, maternity/paternity confirmation, or de novo segregation record for this variant.
Still missing
  • Proband-specific report of the variant as de novo is absent.
  • Maternal and paternal testing results and confirmation of maternity and paternity are absent.
  • No phenotype-qualified de novo point tally is available.
Sources
PS3 Not assessed: no RNA/splicing or in vitro microRNA cleavage assay data for this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP specification (v1.4) defines PS3 via either (a) an RNA/splicing assay showing splicing impact of defined severity, or (b) an in vitro pre-miRNA cleavage assay demonstrating failure or severely reduced capacity to produce 5p/3p microRNAs, with positive and negative controls. No such assay data exists for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G (p.Ile846Val) in this case's evidence bundle: no functional/splicing/cleavage study for this specific variant was retrieved, none of the 5 associated ClinVar-linked PMIDs (24761742, 25394175, 25741868, 28492532, 38084291) is a functional study of this variant (they are guideline/methods/GeneReview papers), and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta 0.029), which is computational, not functional, evidence and does not itself satisfy PS3. The variant is a missense change outside the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846), so no domain-specific cleavage-assay literature was identified as applicable. PS3 cannot be assessed for lack of any validated functional assay data on this variant.

Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for c.2536A>G (max delta score = 0.029), but this is a computational prediction, not a functional assay, and therefore cannot be used to satisfy or refute PS3 per the DICER1 VCEP framework, which requires RNA or in vitro cleavage assay data
  • The five PMIDs referenced from ClinVar submissions for this variant (24761742 DICER1 GeneReview, 25394175 ACMG/NSGC referral guideline, 25741868 ACMG/AMP 2015 standards, 28492532 Sherloc classification framework, 38084291 DICER1 VCEP specification paper) were reviewed and none contains a variant-specific functional cleavage or splicing assay for c.2536A>G/p.Ile846Val
  • Variant is a missense substitution (p.Ile846Val) located outside the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846), so no domain hotspot cleavage-assay data source applies
Still missing
  • No in vitro pre-miRNA cleavage assay (5p/3p microRNA production) data available for this specific variant
  • No RNA/splicing minigene or patient-derived transcript assay data available for this specific variant
  • No functional study identified in the retrieved literature set that examines this variant experimentally
Sources
PS4 Not assessed: no case series or phenotype data sufficient to assign phenotype points was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP specification makes PS4 applicable using phenotype points: supporting for 1–1.5 points, moderate for 2–3.5 points, and strong for at least 4 points. The case bundle contains no validated exact-variant case series, case-control enrichment analysis, or sufficiently detailed unrelated germline proband phenotypes from which phenotype points can be assigned. ClinVar submissions are ordinary single-submitter assertions and do not provide usable phenotype evidence for this criterion. Therefore PS4 cannot be assigned.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP PS4: unrelated probands may contribute up to 1 point each based on phenotype; supporting = 1–1.5 phenotype points, moderate = 2–3.5 points, strong = ≥4 phenotype points. Do not apply if BA1/BS1 criteria are met or if the proband has a qualifying alternative cause or excluded sporadic tumor context.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 VCEP rules specify PS4 point-based thresholds of 1–1.5 points for supporting, 2–3.5 points for moderate, and at least 4 points for strong evidence.
  • The exact-variant ClinVar record is conflicting and single-submitter only, with no expert-panel submission and no sufficiently detailed phenotype dataset suitable for PS4 point assignment.
  • The reviewed DICER1 specification paper states that PS4 was adapted into a proband-counting code with variable strength based on affected unrelated probands, but it does not mention NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G or p.Ile846Val.
Still missing
  • Exact-variant clinical reports or a case-control study with affected and control counts are needed.
  • For each potentially countable unrelated germline proband, the phenotype, genotype, tumor context, and exclusion of an alternative genetic cause are needed to calculate DICER1 VCEP phenotype points.
Sources
PM5 Not assessed: no VCEP-asserted pathogenic missense at residue 846 with an equal or worse Grantham score was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 (DICER1 VCEP v1.4) requires identification of a different missense change at the same residue (Ile846) with equal or worse Grantham score, splicing ruled out, and the comparator variant asserted pathogenic (not likely pathogenic) by the ClinGen DICER1 VCEP. The comparator harvesting artifact (pm5_candidates.json) attempted this search but was interrupted by an HTTP 429 rate-limit error and returned 0 same-residue candidates from only 3 candidates seen, explicitly flagging that PM5 cannot be adjudicated from this artifact alone.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP v1.4 PM5: Moderate if a different missense change at the same residue with equal/worse Grantham score is asserted pathogenic by DICER1 VCEP and splicing effect is ruled out; likely pathogenic comparators do not qualify; cannot combine with PM1 or PS1.
Evidence considered
  • pm5_candidates.json: residue.position=846, reference_aa=I, observed_alt_aa=V; candidate_summary.same_residue_candidates=0; errors=['HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests']; recommendation.hermes_instruction states 'do not apply PM5 from this artifact alone'.
Still missing
  • Same-residue alternate-amino-acid comparator search (ClinVar for other p.Ile846X changes classified pathogenic by DICER1 VCEP) was rate-limited (HTTP 429) and did not complete; needs re-run to identify any qualifying comparator and compare Grantham scores.
Sources
pm5_candidates
PP1 Not assessed: no affected relatives or segregation data were available to score PP1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing DICER1 specification makes PP1 applicable, but the case-evidence bundle contains no affected relatives, genotype-positive relatives, family structure, or countable meioses for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G (p.Ile846Val). Phenotype-positive relatives and segregation data are therefore insufficient to assess PP1.

Rule
Phenotype-positive individuals should have high-, moderate-, or low-specificity phenotypes; do not use segregation of a single low-specificity phenotype across multiple individuals. Strength: Strong for ≥7 meioses across ≥2 families; Moderate for 5–6 meioses across ≥1 family; Supporting for 3–4 meioses across ≥1 family.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 and miRNA-Processing Gene Specification, version 1.4, requires phenotype-positive individuals and defines PP1 strength by meioses: Supporting for 3–4 meioses, Moderate for 5–6 meioses, and Strong for ≥7 meioses across ≥2 families.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no family segregation observations or meiosis count for this variant.
Still missing
  • No family pedigree or relationship information is provided.
  • No genotype results for affected or unaffected relatives are provided.
  • No phenotype-qualified affected relatives or countable meioses are provided.
Sources
PP4 Not assessed: no paired tumor sequencing demonstrating a somatic second hit with retention of this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP restricts PP4 to a specific tumor phenotype pattern: a neoplasm associated with DICER1, a retained germline variant under evaluation, a somatic second hit in one of the specified RNase IIIb hotspot codons, and no additional somatic DICER1 loss-of-function/non-hotspot variant. The bundle does not provide paired tumor sequencing demonstrating that pattern for this variant. A single somatic database observation is not sufficient to establish the required tumor genotype or retention, so PP4 cannot be assigned.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP PP4: supporting when tumor testing in a DICER1-associated neoplasm shows a listed RNase IIIb hotspot somatic second hit and retention of the germline variant under evaluation, with no additional somatic DICER1 non-hotspot variants; not applicable for a germline variant in a listed hotspot codon or when additional somatic variants suggest sporadic tumorigenesis.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 VCEP PP4 rule requires a somatic RNase IIIb hotspot second hit plus retention of the germline variant, with no additional somatic DICER1 non-hotspot variants consistent with sporadic tumorigenesis.
  • The case bundle does not contain the paired tumor genotype, germline-variant retention status, or complete somatic variant profile required by that rule.
  • The reviewed DICER1 specification paper describes PP4 as a tumor phenotype code under the DICER1 two-hit model but does not mention NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G or p.Ile846Val.
Still missing
  • Paired tumor sequencing or an equivalent validated tumor report demonstrating retention of the germline variant is needed.
  • The somatic second-hit allele must be identified as one of the VCEP-listed RNase IIIb hotspot codons, and additional somatic DICER1 variants must be excluded.
Sources
BS2 Not assessed: no homozygotes were seen, but the required data on 10+ tumor-free unrelated females was unavailable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 cannot be fully assessed from the available evidence. gnomAD v4.1 and v2.1 report zero homozygotes for this variant, so the homozygosity routes are not supported. However, the case bundle does not provide the VCEP-required data for 10 or more unrelated females from a single source who are tumor-free through age 50, nor does it establish clinically healthy status and parental confirmation for a homozygous observation.

Rule
40+ unrelated females from a single source are tumor-free through age 50 (caveat: ratio of BS2-eligible females to PS4-eligible probands must be >=40:1) OR 2+ observations of homozygosity in healthy individuals OR 1+ observation(s) of homozygosity in a healthy individual with status confirmed by parental testing. Supporting: 10+ unrelated females from a single source are tumor-free through age 50 (ratio >=10:1) OR 2+ observations of homozygosity in individuals lacking clinical information.
Evidence considered
  • The ClinGen DICER1 VCEP specification permits BS2 Strong for 40 or more unrelated females from one source tumor-free through age 50, two or more homozygous observations in healthy individuals, or one homozygous observation in a healthy individual confirmed by parental testing; BS2 Supporting permits 10 or more such females or two homozygous observations in individuals lacking clinical information.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports 0 homozygotes for the variant across the dataset.
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports 0 homozygotes for the variant across the dataset, but population database absence of homozygotes does not establish the VCEP-defined healthy-individual or tumor-free-female observations.
Still missing
  • No qualifying cohort of at least 10 or 40 unrelated females tumor-free through age 50 from a single source was provided.
  • No healthy homozygous individuals with clinical status and, where required, parental testing were provided.
Sources
BS3 Not assessed: no in vitro microRNA cleavage assay or RNA splicing data for this variant was available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP specification (v1.4) defines BS3 via either (a) an RNA assay for intronic/synonymous variants showing no splicing impact (observed more than once), or (b) an in vitro cleavage assay demonstrating the variant still produces both 5p and 3p microRNAs from a pre-miRNA, with positive and negative controls, citing Wu et al. 2018 as an exemplar assay. This variant is a missense substitution (not intronic/synonymous), so the RNA-assay-for-splicing rule branch does not apply on its face, and no in vitro cleavage assay data for this specific variant was found anywhere in the case evidence bundle. No functional publication in the retrieved literature set (24761742, 25394175, 25741868, 28492532, 38084291) reports a cleavage assay result for this variant. BS3 cannot be assessed for lack of any validated functional assay data.

Evidence considered
  • Variant is a missense substitution, not an intronic or synonymous change, so the BS3 RNA-splicing-assay branch of the DICER1 VCEP rule does not directly apply; only the in vitro cleavage assay branch is potentially relevant, and no such assay data exists for this variant in the case bundle
  • The five PMIDs referenced from ClinVar submissions for this variant were reviewed and none reports an in vitro cleavage assay result for c.2536A>G/p.Ile846Val
Still missing
  • No in vitro pre-miRNA cleavage assay data (demonstrating normal 5p/3p microRNA production) available for this specific variant
  • No functional study identified in the retrieved literature set that examines this variant experimentally
Sources
BS4 Not assessed: no phenotype-positive relatives with negative genotypes were available to assess lack of segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing DICER1 specification makes BS4 applicable when phenotype-positive first-, second-, or third-degree relatives of the proband are genotype-negative. The case-evidence bundle contains no phenotype-positive relatives, relationship information, or genotype-negative familial observations, so lack of segregation cannot be assessed.

Rule
Strong: family members should be phenotype-positive with a high- or moderate-specificity phenotype and genotype-negative as first-, second-, or third-degree relatives of the proband.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 and miRNA-Processing Gene Specification, version 1.4, requires phenotype-positive, genotype-negative first-, second-, or third-degree relatives of the proband for BS4 at Strong strength.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle contains no non-segregation observations for this variant.
Still missing
  • No affected relatives with high- or moderate-specificity DICER1 phenotypes are documented.
  • No genotype-negative relatives and no relationship degrees are documented.
  • No family-level evidence addressing phenocopies or another pathogenic variant is documented.
Sources
BP2 Not assessed: no in-trans or in-cis observations with pathogenic DICER1 variants were available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP permits BP2 at Supporting strength for at least one observation in trans with a P/LP DICER1 variant, or at least three observations in cis or with phase unknown involving two or more different P/LP DICER1 variants. The case-evidence bundle contains no affected-proband, family, co-occurring-variant, phase, cis, or trans observations for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G (p.Ile846Val), so the threshold cannot be evaluated.

Rule
≥1 observation in trans with P/LP DICER1 variant or ≥3 observations in cis or phase unknown with 2+ different P/LP DICER1 variants.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP BP2 rule requires at least one trans observation with a P/LP DICER1 variant, or at least three cis/phase-unknown observations involving at least two different P/LP DICER1 variants.
  • The consolidated case-evidence bundle reports no phase, cis, trans, affected-proband, family, or co-occurring DICER1-variant observations for this variant.
Still missing
  • Affected-proband or family-level observations containing the evaluated variant and another P/LP DICER1 variant
  • Validated phase information establishing cis or trans, or sufficient observations meeting the VCEP phase-unknown threshold
  • Pathogenic/likely pathogenic status of any co-occurring DICER1 variant
Sources
Not applicable · 11· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: this is a missense change, and PVS1 applies only to null variants (nonsense/frameshift with NMD, canonical splice) under the DICER1 VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G is a missense variant (NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val)); consequence_class is 'missense' with no canonical splice consensus disruption. The DICER1 VCEP (cSpec v1.4) PVS1 rule is scoped exclusively to null-variant classes: nonsense/frameshift variants predicted to trigger NMD (cutoff p.Pro1850) and canonical +/-1,2 splice donor/acceptor variants (with exon-specific downgrades for exons 5, 10, 15, 18, 22, 27; exon 1 and the p.Met1? start-loss are excluded outright). A missense substitution does not fall into any of these buckets, so no loss-of-function/NMD mechanism applies and PVS1 cannot be scored for this variant.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP cSpec v1.4 PVS1 rule (null variants only: nonsense/frameshift with NMD prediction, canonical +/-1,2 splice variants)
Evidence considered
  • case_summary.json pvs1_variant_assessment: consequence_class='missense', canonical_splice_consensus=false, variant_bucket='other', rationale states the variant does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice consensus variants.
  • cSpec DICER1 VCEP v1.4 PVS1 rule text restricts application to nonsense/frameshift variants (NMD cutoff p.Pro1850) and canonical splice donor/acceptor variants with per-exon strength modifiers; no provision exists for missense substitutions.
Sources
PM3 VCEPNot applicable: DICER1 predisposition is autosomal dominant, so recessive trans-phase evidence (PM3) is not scored. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen DICER1 and miRNA-Processing Gene Expert Panel specification identifies DICER1-related tumor predisposition as autosomal dominant and marks PM3 as not applicable. Therefore, recessive trans-phase evidence is not evaluated for this variant.

VCEP rule
Autosomal dominant.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 VCEP framework specifies autosomal dominant inheritance and marks PM3 as not applicable; the generic PM3 trans-with-pathogenic-variant rule is therefore not used.
Sources
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 applies only to in-frame indels, and this is a single-nucleotide missense substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP PM4 rule applies exclusively to in-frame indels: Moderate strength for in-frame indels within the RNase IIIb domain (p.Y1682-p.S1846), Supporting strength for in-frame indels outside that domain and outside the specified repeat regions (p.D606-p.D609; p.E1418-p.E1420; p.E1422-p.E1425). c.2536A>G is a single-nucleotide substitution producing a missense change (p.Ile846Val), not an in-frame insertion/deletion, so there is no protein length change and the PM4 rule is structurally inapplicable to this variant type.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP cSpec v1.4 PM4 rule (in-frame indels only)
Evidence considered
  • cSpec DICER1 VCEP v1.4 PM4 rule text is limited to 'in-frame indels' with domain-based strength tiers; c.2536A>G is a substitution (A>G) yielding a missense codon change, not an indel, so protein length is unchanged and PM4 does not apply.
Sources
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the DICER1 VCEP directs de novo evidence to PS2 instead of PM6. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM6 is explicitly not applicable in the governing DICER1 specification. The specification instructs users to combine de novo evidence with PS2 and use PS2 instead of PM6.

VCEP rule
Not applicable for DICER1; use PS2 instead of PM6.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 and miRNA-Processing Gene Specification, version 1.4, marks PM6 not applicable and states: Combined with PS2. Use PS2 instead of PM6.
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot applicable: the DICER1 VCEP explicitly marks PP2 as not applicable for this gene. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP specification (v1.4) explicitly marks PP2 as Not Applicable for DICER1, overriding the generic ACMG missense-constraint rationale.

VCEP rule
DICER1 VCEP v1.4 PP2: Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 cspec v1.4 lists PP2 with "applicability": "Not Applicable".
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: excluded by the DICER1 VCEP, and the ClinVar record has no expert-panel submission. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 is explicitly excluded/not applicable in the DICER1 VCEP specification. Independently, the exact-variant ClinVar record has no expert-panel submission and contains only ordinary single-submitter classifications, so it does not meet the required expert-panel condition for PP5.

VCEP rule
Not applicable under the DICER1 VCEP specification; an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic assertion would otherwise be required by the requested rule, but none is present.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 VCEP specification lists PP5 as not applicable/excluded.
  • The exact ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions; its classifications are single-submitter laboratory assertions and the aggregate record is not eligible to trigger PP5.
  • The reviewed DICER1 specification paper states that PP5 was excluded for DICER1.
Sources
BP1 VCEPNot applicable: the DICER1 VCEP explicitly marks BP1 as not applicable for this gene. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP specification (v1.4) explicitly marks BP1 as Not Applicable for DICER1, reflecting the gene's dominant tumor-predisposition missense mechanism where BP1's typical LOF-gene missense-benign logic does not apply.

VCEP rule
DICER1 VCEP v1.4 BP1: Not Applicable.
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 cspec v1.4 lists BP1 with "applicability": "Not Applicable".
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: the DICER1 VCEP explicitly marks BP3 as not applicable for this gene. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The DICER1 VCEP cSpec v1.4 explicitly marks BP3 as 'Not Applicable' for this gene, with no rule text or threshold provided. This gene-specific specification takes precedence over generic ACMG/AMP, so BP3 is not assessed for any DICER1 variant, including this missense substitution.

VCEP rule
DICER1 VCEP cSpec v1.4: BP3 = Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • cSpec DICER1 VCEP v1.4 lists BP3 with applicability='Not Applicable' and no rule content, overriding the generic ACMG/AMP BP3 (in-frame indel in a repetitive region without a known function) for this gene.
Sources
BP5 VCEPNot applicable: the DICER1 VCEP explicitly excludes BP5 for this gene. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP5 is explicitly excluded/not applicable in the DICER1 VCEP specification. No BP5 assessment is made from the absence or presence of an alternative cause in the case bundle.

VCEP rule
Not applicable under the DICER1 VCEP specification.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 VCEP specification lists BP5 as not applicable/excluded.
  • The reviewed DICER1 specification paper states that BP5 was excluded for DICER1.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: excluded by the DICER1 VCEP, and the ClinVar record lacks an expert-panel assertion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 is explicitly excluded/not applicable in the DICER1 VCEP specification. The exact-variant ClinVar record has no expert-panel submission; its single-submitter Likely benign laboratory assertion and conflicting aggregate record cannot trigger BP6 under the requested rule.

VCEP rule
Not applicable under the DICER1 VCEP specification; an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign/Likely benign assertion would otherwise be required by the requested rule, but none is present.
Evidence considered
  • The DICER1 VCEP specification lists BP6 as not applicable/excluded.
  • The exact ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions; the Likely benign assertion is from a single laboratory and the aggregate ClinVar classification is conflicting, so neither is eligible to trigger BP6.
  • The reviewed DICER1 specification paper states that BP6 was excluded for DICER1.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies only to synonymous or non-coding variants, and this is a missense substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 under the DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 applies only to silent (synonymous) variants, intronic variants at/beyond +7 to -21, or other non-coding variants meeting conservation criteria (and requires BP4 to also be met as a caveat). NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G is a missense variant (NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val)), not a silent/synonymous or intronic/non-coding change, so BP7 does not apply to this variant type.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP7: silent/intronic/non-coding variants only
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP7 rule scope is limited to silent variants, intronic variants (+7 to -21 or beyond), or other non-coding variants; the variant under evaluation is a missense substitution p.(Ile846Val), outside this scope.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
DICER1
Transcript
NM_177438.2
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val)
GRCh38
chr14:95107994 T>C
GRCh37
chr14:95574331 T>C
Location and type
Exon 16 · missense
ClinVar
477106
COSMIC
COSV100601996

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in DICER1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_177438.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.

DICER1NM_177438.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 50 / 1,613,432 alleles AF 3.1e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 2.99e-05
gnomAD v2.1 10 / 251,156 alleles AF 3.98e-05 · 0 homozygotes · FAF 2.86e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 3.1e-05 · 50 / 1,613,432 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 3e-05
Admixed American3 / 60,004 5e-05
European (non-Finnish)46 / 1,179,484 3.9e-05
Remaining individuals1 / 62,462 1.6e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 7 other groups: European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 4e-05 · 10 / 251,156 alleles · 0 hom · FAF 2.9e-05
Admixed American3 / 34,592 8.7e-05
European (non-Finnish)7 / 113,534 6.2e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 6 other groups: African/African American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.09898e-05; MAF= 0.00310%, 50/1613432 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 4.99967e-05; MAF= 0.00500%, 3/60004 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.989e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.98159e-05; MAF= 0.00398%, 10/251156 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 8.67253e-05; MAF= 0.00867%, 3/34592 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.858e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +99 bp
0.029
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -61 bp
0.002
SpliceAI donor lossat -114 bp
0.008
SpliceAI donor gainat +5 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.039
Pangolin splice gain
0.002

Other predictors

REVEL
0.191
BayesDel
-0.330

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingMet (Supporting): REVEL 0.191 is below the <0.500 threshold and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta 0.029). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Per ClinGen DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4, BP4 (Supporting) applies to missense variants with REVEL < 0.500 and agreement in splicing predictors that no splicing effect is predicted. Local REVEL score is 0.191, well under the 0.500 threshold. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.029, far below the actionable ~0.2 range), consistent with 'no splicing effects predicted.' MaxEntScan output was not separately computed in this case bundle, but SpliceAI (the VCEP's primary splice-impact tool, applicable per the VCEP's own instructionsToUse for scores outside/without a MaxEntScan-flagged region) shows no splicing signal, and this missense substitution does not fall in a canonical splice region requiring MES cross-check. Both REVEL and splicing-predictor prongs of the VCEP BP4 rule are satisfied; BP4 Supporting applies.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP4: missense REVEL < 0.500 and splicing-predictor agreement on no splicing effect
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP4 rule: 'For missense variants, REVEL score < 0.500 and agreement in splicing predictors that no splicing effects are predicted.'
  • Local REVEL v1.3 lookup: score = 0.191 for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G, below the 0.500 benign-supporting threshold specified by the VCEP.
  • SpliceAI Lookup: max delta score = 0.029 (DS_AG=0.002, DS_AL=0.029, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.008), indicating no predicted splicing impact, consistent with the 'no splicing effects predicted' component of the VCEP BP4 rule.
  • REVEL score calibration for the 0.5 boundary is supported by the ClinGen SVI-endorsed calibration in Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID 36413997).
Sources
PP3 Not met: REVEL 0.191 is far below the >=0.750 threshold, and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta 0.029). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Variant is missense (NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val)). Per ClinGen DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4, PP3 (Supporting) requires REVEL >= 0.750 OR agreement in splicing predictors predicting a splicing effect. Local REVEL lookup gives 0.191, far below the 0.750 threshold. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score = 0.029, well below the conventional 0.2 SpliceAI actionable threshold), so there is no splicing-predictor support for a deleterious effect either. Neither prong of the VCEP PP3 rule is satisfied.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 PP3: missense REVEL >= 0.750 OR splicing-predictor agreement on splicing effect
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 PP3 rule: 'For missense variants, REVEL score >= 0.750 OR agreement in splicing predictors predict splicing effects.'
  • Local REVEL v1.3 lookup: score = 0.191 for NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G (chr14 zip lookup), well below the 0.750 pathogenic-supporting threshold specified by the VCEP.
  • SpliceAI Lookup (broadinstitute) scores: DS_AG=0.002, DS_AL=0.029, DS_DG=0.0, DS_DL=0.008; max delta score = 0.029, indicating no predicted splicing effect.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 applies only to synonymous or non-coding variants, and this is a missense substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 under the DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 applies only to silent (synonymous) variants, intronic variants at/beyond +7 to -21, or other non-coding variants meeting conservation criteria (and requires BP4 to also be met as a caveat). NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G is a missense variant (NP_803187.1:p.(Ile846Val)), not a silent/synonymous or intronic/non-coding change, so BP7 does not apply to this variant type.

Rule
DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP7: silent/intronic/non-coding variants only
Evidence considered
  • DICER1 VCEP CSpec v1.4 BP7 rule scope is limited to silent variants, intronic variants (+7 to -21 or beyond), or other non-coding variants; the variant under evaluation is a missense substitution p.(Ile846Val), outside this scope.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.03). REVEL score = 0.191. BayesDel score = -0.329637.

5 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • DICER1-Related Tumor Predisposition.
    Adam MP et al. · 1993
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 24761742 ↗
  • A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
    Hampel H et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25394175 ↗
  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    Richards S et al. · 2015
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    Nykamp K et al. · 2017
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗
  • Specifications of the ACMG/AMP Variant Classification Guidelines for Germline DICER1 Variant Curation.
    Hatton JN et al. · 2023
    The DICER1-specific ACMG/AMP specification describes PS4 as a phenotype/proband-counting criterion and PP4 as a tumor phenotype criterion under a DICER1 two-hit model. It also states that PP5 and BP5/BP6 were excluded from the DICER1-specific criterion set. The paper does not report NM_177438.2:c.2536A>G or p.Ile846Val.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 38084291 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Eight evidence codes (PM3, PM6, PP2, PP5, BP1, BP3, BP5, and BP6) were excluded due to redundancy, irrelevance with respect to DICER1, or published ClinGen guidance [19]. The remaining 20 criteria were kept with clarifications and/or gene-specific modifications to strength or scope.

    Section 3.1, DICER1-Specific Variant Curation Criteria

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.09898e-05; MAF= 0.00310%, 50/1613432 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 4.99967e-05; MAF= 0.00500%, 3/60004 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.989e-05.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.98159e-05; MAF= 0.00398%, 10/251156 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 8.67253e-05; MAF= 0.00867%, 3/34592 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 2.858e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (5 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 477106)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.03). REVEL score = 0.191. BayesDel score = -0.329637.

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. DICER1, an endoribonuclease, is altered in various cancer types.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV100601996, n = 1 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.