0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

EZHIP c.162C>T, p.(Pro54=)

NM_203407.3:c.162C>T NP_981952.1:p.(Pro54=) View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

No variant summary was recorded for this case.

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About EZHIP

No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 1 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 1
PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 at an extremely low allele frequency of 0.00018% (1/570,831 alleles, 0 homozygotes) and is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, meeting the <0.1% threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP7Supporting
BP7 · supporting

NM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a synonymous variant (p.Pro54=) and SpliceAI predicts no impact on splicing (max delta score = 0.00). Nucleotide-level conservation has not been explicitly assessed.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, BP7 supporting benign; combination = 1 supporting + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

SpliceAI score
0.000 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.

29 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 8 not met · 12 not assessed · 7 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

NM_203407.3:c.162C>T (p.Pro54=) is a synonymous variant in EZHIP with no predicted splice impact (SpliceAI max delta = 0.00) and is present at extremely low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (1/570,831 alleles).

BP7 (supporting benign) is met: the variant is synonymous and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact.

PM2 (supporting) is met: the variant is present at 0.00018% in gnomAD v4.1, below the 0.1% threshold.

One supporting benign criterion (BP7) and one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) are met; these do not combine to a definitive classification under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules. The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Met · 2

PM2 SupportingThis variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 at an extremely low allele frequency of 0.00018% (1/570,831 alleles, 0 homozygotes) and is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, meeting the <0.1% threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: AF = 1.75e-06 (1/570
  • 831 alleles
  • 0 homozygotes)
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent
  • gnomAD-Canada v1.0: absent
Sources
BP7 SupportingNM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a synonymous variant (p.Pro54=) and SpliceAI predicts no impact on splicing (max delta score = 0.00). Nucleotide-level conservation has not been explicitly assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous substitution (CCC→CCT
  • both encode Proline)
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 — no splice impact predicted.
Still missing
  • Nucleotide conservation not explicitly assessed.
Sources

Not met · 8 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 No previously established pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change exists for this residue; the variant is absent from ClinVar and no literature reports a pathogenic synonymous change at codon 54. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
  • no pathogenic synonymous variant at this codon identified in any database.
Sources
PM1 This variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot, and no critical functional domain has been defined where missense variation is enriched in disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Hotspot analysis: variant not in a significant hotspot region.
PP3 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), and REVEL and BayesDel scores are unavailable for this variant. No in silico tool predicts a deleterious effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (no predicted splice impact)
  • REVEL: not available for this genomic position
  • BayesDel: not available for this genomic position
Still missing
  • REVEL and BayesDel scores unavailable
  • conservation data not assessed.
Sources
PP5 No reputable source (ClinVar, expert panel, or published literature) has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
  • no expert panel classification available.
Sources
BA1 The variant allele frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (0.00018%) is far below the 1% BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00018% (1/570
  • 831 alleles).
Sources
BS1 The variant allele frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (0.00018%) is far below the 0.3% BS1 threshold and is not greater than expected for an EZHIP-associated disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00018% (1/570
  • 831 alleles).
Sources
BP4 Only SpliceAI was available and predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00). BP4 requires multiple lines of computational evidence supporting a benign effect; REVEL and BayesDel are unavailable, and conservation data were not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 — no splice impact predicted
  • no additional in silico scores available.
Still missing
  • REVEL
  • BayesDel
  • and conservation data unavailable.
Sources
BP6 No reputable source (ClinVar, expert panel, or published literature) has classified this variant as benign. The variant is absent from ClinVar. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Variant absent from ClinVar
  • no benign classification from any reputable source.
Sources

Not assessed · 12 · no assessment recorded

PS2 No de novo data with confirmed maternity and paternity are available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No patient or family data available.
PS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect have been identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No functional data available from literature or curated databases.
PS4 No case-control or cohort prevalence data are available; the variant is absent from ClinVar and unreported in affected individuals. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No affected-individual data available.
PM6 No de novo data (with or without confirmed parentage) are available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No patient or family data available.
PP1 No cosegregation data with disease in multiple affected family members are available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No family or pedigree data available.
PP4 No patient phenotype or family history data are available to assess specificity for an EZHIP-associated disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No clinical phenotype data available.
BS2 A single carrier is present in gnomAD v4.1 but no phenotype data are available for this individual; cannot confirm observation in a healthy adult with full penetrance expected at an early age. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • One heterozygous carrier in gnomAD v4.1
  • phenotype unknown.
Still missing
  • No phenotype data on the single gnomAD carrier.
Sources
BS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect have been identified for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No functional data available.
BS4 No segregation data in affected families are available to assess lack of cosegregation with disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No family or pedigree data available.
BP2 No data are available on whether this variant has been observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in EZHIP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No phase or trans-configuration data available.
BP5 No data are available on whether this variant has been observed in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No patient-level molecular data available.
PS5 No alternative pathogenic variant has been reported at this nucleotide position. Details ▾Hide ▴
Still missing
  • No data on alternative nucleotide changes at c.162.
Not applicable · 7· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a synonymous variant (p.Pro54=) and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous substitution with no predicted effect on splicing (SpliceAI max delta = 0.00).
Sources
pvs1_variant_assessmentpvs1_generic_framework ↗
PM3 N/APM3 requires observation in trans with a pathogenic variant for recessive disorders; no trans data available and EZHIP is on chromosome X. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM4 N/APM4 applies to protein-length-altering variants (in-frame indels, stop-loss); NM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a single-nucleotide synonymous substitution that does not alter protein length. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

PM5 N/ANM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a synonymous variant (p.Pro54=) producing no amino acid change; PM5 requires a novel missense change at a residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been established. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous variant — no amino acid change to compare.
PP2 N/ANM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a synonymous variant, not a missense change; PP2 applies only to missense variants in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous variant — not eligible for PP2.
BP1 N/ANM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a synonymous variant, not a missense change; BP1 applies only to missense variants in genes where only truncating variants cause disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous variant — not eligible for BP1.
BP3 N/ABP3 applies to in-frame indels in repetitive regions; NM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a single-nucleotide substitution. Details ▾Hide ▴

No further detail was recorded.

Identifiers

Gene
EZHIP
Transcript
NM_203407.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_203407.3:c.162C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_981952.1:p.(Pro54=)
GRCh38
chrX:51407178 C>T
GRCh37
chrX:51150030 C>T

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in EZHIP, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_203407.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

EZHIPNM_203407.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 1 / 570,831 alleles AF 1.75e-06 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 1.8e-06 · 1 / 570,831 alleles · 0 hom
European (non-Finnish)1 / 309,434 3.2e-06
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American.

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.75183e-06; MAF= 0.00018%, 1/570831 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 3.23171e-06; MAF= 0.00032%, 1/309434 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +50 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -19 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat +172 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +170 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.000
Pangolin splice gain
0.000

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

BP7 SupportingNM_203407.3:c.162C>T is a synonymous variant (p.Pro54=) and SpliceAI predicts no impact on splicing (max delta score = 0.00). Nucleotide-level conservation has not been explicitly assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • Synonymous substitution (CCC→CCT
  • both encode Proline)
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 — no splice impact predicted.
Still missing
  • Nucleotide conservation not explicitly assessed.
Sources
PP3 SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00), and REVEL and BayesDel scores are unavailable for this variant. No in silico tool predicts a deleterious effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (no predicted splice impact)
  • REVEL: not available for this genomic position
  • BayesDel: not available for this genomic position
Still missing
  • REVEL and BayesDel scores unavailable
  • conservation data not assessed.
Sources
BP4 Only SpliceAI was available and predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00). BP4 requires multiple lines of computational evidence supporting a benign effect; REVEL and BayesDel are unavailable, and conservation data were not assessed. Details ▾Hide ▴
Evidence considered
  • SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 — no splice impact predicted
  • no additional in silico scores available.
Still missing
  • REVEL
  • BayesDel
  • and conservation data unavailable.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.75183e-06; MAF= 0.00018%, 1/570831 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 3.23171e-06; MAF= 0.00032%, 1/309434 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.