About FGFR4
No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
No variant summary was recorded for this case.
Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.
Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.No gene-level summary was recorded for this case.
The recorded framework is Not recorded. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
NM_213647.2:c.317C>T is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population databases (allele frequency < 0.1%), meeting the PM2 criterion for a variant absent or at extremely low frequency in large population cohorts.
Multiple lines of in silico evidence suggest no significant impact on gene product. BayesDel score is -0.025 (benign range), SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no predicted splice alteration), and REVEL score is 0.43 (below accepted pathogenicity thresholds). Together these predictors favor a neutral or minimally disruptive effect.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 moderate + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.
Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.
gnomAD v4.1 allele counts were not recorded for this variant.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.000. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.
A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. FGFR4, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is altered by mutation, chromosomal rearrangement or amplification at low frequencies in various cancer types.
This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
ACMG/AMP criteria under Not recorded, with the data and sources behind each one.
29 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 5 not met · 16 not assessed · 6 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
NM_213647.2:c.317C>T (p.Ser106Phe) is absent from all queried population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada), meeting PM2 at moderate strength.
Multiple in silico predictors suggest no significant impact on the gene product: BayesDel score is -0.025 (benign range), SpliceAI max delta is 0.00, and REVEL score of 0.43 falls below standard pathogenicity thresholds, meeting BP4 at supporting benign strength.
The variant is absent from ClinVar and the literature; no functional, segregation, de novo, case-control, or clinical classification data are available to assess PS1–PS5, PM6, PP1–PP5, BS2–BS4, BP2, BP5, or BP6.
PVS1 is not applicable: c.317C>T is a missense variant encoding p.Ser106Phe and does not fall into any null-variant bucket under the ClinGen SVI PVS1 decision tree (PMC6185798).
PM1 is not met: residue 106 is not a statistically significant mutational hotspot and FGFR4 lacks a germline disease-associated hotspot map.
PM5 is not applicable: no same-residue pathogenic comparator variant at codon 106 with a different amino acid change was identified in ClinVar.
BP1 is not met: while FGFR4 loss-of-function is supported as a disease mechanism by gene-level literature, the gene-disease validity has not been established at a ClinGen level and missense variants are not excluded as a disease mechanism.
The evidence profile consists of one moderate pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4), resulting in conflicting evidence. Under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules (PMID:25741868), this is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
No criteria match.
No further detail was recorded.
No further detail was recorded.
No further detail was recorded.
Every interpreted variant in FGFR4, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_213647.2. Select a row to find it on the plot.
| Protein | Location | Classification | Link |
|---|
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.43. BayesDel score = -0.0252428.
0 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata.
Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.43. BayesDel score = -0.0252428.
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. FGFR4, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is altered by mutation, chromosomal rearrangement or amplification at low frequencies in various cancer types.
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.